This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Suspicious Package Found At Angela Merkel's Office
From Der Tagesspiegel (google translated):
In
the chancellery in Berlin, is for information of the Tagesspiegel on
Tuesday afternoon a package was found in an article in which the
suspected explosive is on ..
The application was in progress, it said in security circles. The subject had arrived in the mail was being examined for explosives, it said. Last week, Al Qaeda had
sent from Yemen two parcel bombs, one of which was transferred to the
airport Cologne-Bonn in a cargo plane in the nedirection of the UK. Both bombs contained several hundred grams of high explosive PETN. The Chancellor's Office announced an opinion for the afternoon.
Employees of the Swiss embassy discovered a package bomb and threw them into the courtyard of the building where it exploded. The remaining four parcel bombs were explosives experts defused some of the Greek Police by controlled explosions. They were the ambassadors of Germany, Bulgaria, Chile and Russia addressed to. (With AFP)
»
- 7805 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
LIARS!!! FUCKING LIARS!!!!
That says it all.
Tell us what you really think.
LOL. First thought that comes to mind.
Yemen postmark?
Yeah, I know I'm getting all my toner from Yemen.
Cutting edge shit, no less. Toner cartridges. Weren't thay made obsolete in 1492 along with those daisy printer wheels and Correctol?
"Yemen postmark?"
Nope - Greek! They want to share the love, man.
You mean..... Not Al Queda .. Not Linked to ..... Not a part of the War on.....
You mean it's just some pissed off Goat Cheese makers who can't handle the Truth on Austerity....
My World is crumbling under the weight of Lies
OK, OK, so as not to crush your world... the postmark was from a known Islamic section of Greece.
Better now?
I don't get the point of package assassination attempts. Every single mail received by an official facility is double-checked, and presidents themselves don't read 99% of the letters they receive.
False flag.
Lots of 'em, lately.
yep
FALSE FLAGS TO SAVE THEIR CORRUPT HIDES!
Is there any question? Seems fairly obvious.
Good lord. It seems to me that a brand new package of BVD's found in the sock area of WalMart would qualify as a "suspicious package" these days.
It sure does look like the public consciousness is being properly primed for an "event" of such magnitude that we might need to surrender the few remaining liberties and rights we "enjoy" in order to save ourselves from the fictitious Boogie Man.
I'm always amazed how competent the "terrorists" are when fighting our troops in Iraq or Afghanistan and how incompetent they are with much simpler tasks. I wonder why?
Because DMV employees are doing the work? After all, the level of competence seems very familiar...
Spot on, baby.
Mother, do you think they'll drop the bomb?
Mother, do you think they'll like this song?
Mother, do you think they'll try to break my balls?
Mother, should I build the wall?
Mother, should I run for President?
Mother, should I trust the government?
Mother, will they put me in the firing line?
Is it just a waste of time?
Hush now baby, baby, don't you cry
Momma's gonna make all of your nightmares come true
Momma's gonna put all of her fears into you
Momma's gonna keep you right here under her wing
She won't let you fly, but she might let you sing
Momma's will keep Baby cozy and warm
Oooo Babe
Oooo Babe
Ooo Babe, of course Momma's gonna help build the wall
Mother, do you think she's good enough
For me?
Mother, do you think she's dangerous
To me?
Mother will she tear your little boy apart?
Mother, will she break my heart?
Hush now baby, baby, don't you cry
Momma's gonna check out all your girlfriends for you
Momma won't let anyone dirty get through
Momma's gonna wait up until you get in
Momma will always find out where you've been
Momma's gonna keep Baby healthy and clean
Oooo Babe
Oooo Babe
Ooo Babe, you'll always be Baby to me
Mother, did it need to be so high?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBkTUzKAiXQ
Lol. Hey look over here.
CD....good points on all accounts. looks like everyone is correct, if the post ain't junked it isn't worth reading...lol
Papers please.
BTW, I didn't need to say "Please".
Why was this junked?
God forbid critical thinking and logic should go unjunked.
Actually I've picked up a few shadow junkers just like others pick up stray dogs. I've laced some MilkBones with poison so the problem should resolve in a few days.
Why was this junked?
Security to Merkle: "always 'A' dildo, never 'YOUR' dildo..."
Security: "But, vhen a package vibrates, zhen zah throwers must call zhe police."
Merkle: "Mein package vas vibrating?
Security: "Nine times out of ten ist electric razor, but every vonce in a while..."
Merkle: Scratches man beard...
Security: "Dos ist dildo... In zhe event of zah dildo... ve say 'A' dildo, never 'YOUR, dildo."
Merkle: "I don't own zhe..."
Security: "Beard or zhe dildo...?"
LOL
I even played along at home and said the words out loud with the accent. What's my.......er.....the prize Johnny?
Double Post: NSA always fucking with my intranets...
I always blame my mother in law. But never when she's visiting or the wife's within ear shot.
http://www.youtube.com/user/thealexjoneschannel?blend=1&ob=4#p/u/6/ZgIfnHxJcls
My ass. Explosives don't go off, at least not the last few hundred they've found. Funny how the "terrorists" can't make a properly functioning bomb on usa election day. Unless a nuke goes off somewhere pretty soon I call bullshit on the whole thing.
Terrorism does exist. It's not just a made up scare tactic. Fortunately though, intelligent people tend to have things like jobs and families which steers them from a (short) life of terror.
It's the stupid and undisciplined that tend to reach for the explosives. With predictable results.
Your comment is level-headed and accurate. So the troofers hate it. lulz
Without the sweat of our law enforcement agencies defending our liberties night and day, I wouldn't be able to sleep.
I'm so impressed that they're getting a handle on this great mail bomb threat.
I'm almost tempted to mail FBI Director Mueller a map so he can find Wall Street. Mailed in an envelope, of course.
Off to the Gulag with you, faux terrorist boy!
Why does it seem that most folks are now more worried about the "authorities" than the "terrorists"?
Fine fucking job, Smedley. Hearts and minds, eh what? (Harrrumph, blubbering sound)
Well, it's popular around here to make various claims of who is The Most Dangerous Man To America.
Given that the FBI is supposedly both the first and last line of defense of the Rule Of Law in America and they are doing nothing about the mega-crimes of the gangster oligarchs on Wall Street, I'd have to say that FBI Director Mueller is The Most Dangerous Man To America. Without law enforcement, you have to expect that criminals will run wild. That's what they do.
It's Mueller who's making it possible.
Why are we afraid to talk about such things? Seems to me our fears have gotten away from us. Patriot Act, etc. I say we should speak our minds without breaking laws and see what comes of it. The alternative is to silence ourselves on the most truly important issues.
I hear all kinds of bitching about the death of the Rule of Law. How about we start pointing fingers at the criminally negligent head of the FBI: Director Mueller?
It seems insane to me that nobody dare speak his name.
Whether he has undercover agents among us or not. Maybe they will be encouraged to do a little thinking themselves.
Hey Bob, are you watching the Petraeus meme building?
Now that is something I'd keep my eye on. This whole Billary, Biden, Betray Us..
Yoiks!
ORI
http://aadivaahan.wordpress.com
Sure it exists, question is, who funds it? Or should I say which intelligence agency?
For instance, so far, every terrorist captured by the FBI was first setup by them in some sort of sting op, where they either provided materials, or pretended to. They have yet to bust-up a single scheme that they did not concoct.
"They have yet to bust-up a single scheme that they did not concoct."
That's only because it was somebody else's idea to elect Barack Hussein Obama as POTUS.
Keep watching MSM.
Soooo, that doesn't rule out a central banker...who has the greatest MO. I define "having a job" as making an actual positive contribution to society.
Enough with the suspicious package media blitz! They're obviously establishing the excuse for more clampdowns.
The next one is that whore of Berlusconi and eventually Zapatero and why not the dirty mop of Rampuy? What about Trichet? It can go on and on just enough to make some more police and Orwellian State! Hoch lebe the dirty criminal Oceania with its stupid cattle!
Beware of Greeks bearing gifts.
Scare the sheeple into accepting more 'defence against terrorism' (sheeple control)
Bulgarian embassy?? Really?
Reminds me of an old Russian joke: "If you see a Bulgarian in the street, beat him. He will know the reason why."
Candygram fur dich....
Does Google Translator ever listen to what is says? Fucking atrocity.
Tyler, the editing is atrocious. It is almost unreadable- not that it matters. No one is buying this crappola and so the powers that be seem to be ratcheting up their attempts to impress somebody.
That is the problem with a 9/11. Once you do major violence to your population, this small scale garbage just doesn't scare anyone. This isn't a false flag, more like a false fart.
"There is either fart or no fart. There is no false fart." - Yoda
Wise old fart!
There is of course the silent but deadly version...a WMD to be proud of!
Here are some peer-reviews primary sources for troofers who want to learn to read science good.
Behaviour of lightweight composite trusses in fire: A case study,” STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES 7 (2): 105-118 APR 2007
“Mechanics of progressive collapse: Learning from world trade center and building demolitions,” JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE 133 (3): 308-319 MAR 2007
“Finite element code for impact collapse problems of framed structures,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING 69 (12): 2538-2563 MAR 19 2007
“Impact of the Boeing 767 aircraft into the World Trade Center,” JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE 131 (10): 1066-1072 OCT 2005
“Effect of insulation on the fire behaviour of steel floor trusses,” FIRE AND MATERIALS 29 (4): 181-194 JUL-AUG 2005
“Stability of the World Trade Center Twin Towers structural frame in multiple floor fires,” JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE 131 (6): 654-657 JUN 2005
“Structural responses of world trade center under aircraft attacks,” JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE 131 (1): 6-15 JAN 2005
“Use of high-efficiency energy absorbing device to arrest progressive collapse of tall building,” JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE 130 (10): 1177-1187 OCT 2004
“How did the WTC towers collapse: a new theory,” FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL 38 (6): 501-533 OCT 2003
“A suggested cause of the fire-induced collapse of the World Trade Towers,” FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL 37 (7): 707-716 OCT 2002
Fuck you, brainwashed idiot!
Go fight yourself the war on terror! And better get killed!
Are this peer-reviews exactly well reviewed as this one about melting Himalaya icebergs ?
And who payed all this "experts": Taxpayer or Benny with his printer ?
I suspect your "melting Himalaya icebergs" are only a threat to the Swiss Navy.
Now, explain the presence of thermite and the collapse of Building 7. Too many engineers disagree with you. I assume they read the same journals and are not impressed. Why should your list impress me?
Thermite is just iron and aluminum, finely shaved. It is far from surprising that there would be residue of iron and aluminum after a large, uncontrolled, extremely hot fire like that.
Given that the other two towers had by this time been undermined, it is not surprising that a fire could have spread through the tunnels connecting the buildings, causing the collapse of 7WTC.
Such large and totally uncontrolled fires in office buildings are rare to the point of non-existence. 9/11 created an unprecedented mode of building failure that is certain to leave some odd things in its wake.
The fact is that if 9/11 were really a conspiracy, there would have been whistleblowers. Dozens of people would have had to have been involved, and murdering thousands of Americans probably would have caused at least one of them to break ranks.
That is as supportive as what conspiracy theorists are accused of. HAHAHAHAHA. You got me!
Given that the other two towers had by this time been undermined, it is not surprising that a fire could have spread through the tunnels connecting the buildings, causing the collapse of 7WTC.
Its not so much the question that it collapsed, but how it collapsed. It fell into its own footprint, and if you watch the video closely you will be able to see the structure (penthouse?) on top of WTC7 start to fall before the main structure falls. Falling debris and fire doesn't explain this.
You can't tell these guys anything. They Cherry pick certain claims and regurgitate the rebuffs they heard on MSM.
Somehow people like ITG agree completely that the government and corporate America (and banksters) act against the will of the American people, but, they do not see the convenience of this "war on terror" to further the agenda of the same people.. absurd..
It's not hard to figure out his roll..
I would just like to hear a logical explanation, but have yet to hear one. Its not that I want to believe this but the evidence is undeniable .
Actually WTC7 didn't fall in its own footprint; that is a made-up trooferism. It fell to the south. Check it.
Just checked it. Yup, pretty much all of it is there within it's own footprint. Even NIST admitted as much in it's final report. That building didn't "fall" south, it imploded basically straight down.
Notice how the sides and front are neatly folded in. Brilliant job actually. Too bad mother nature is never this neat. This is clearly man made. This building WAS 47 stories tall. The buildings on either side were less than 20. See how undamaged they are considering what just happened.
Mother nature, you with your terrible "fire power", we salute you.
And here is the final report:
http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment.pdf
Will any troofers read it?
Get a real job you witless ferret.
I've read it from cover to cover as well as the 10,000 page Twin Tower NIST report. As well as the FEMA report. As I always say, it's what is not said that's just as important as what is said.
A bit more information on this NIST page. Including a "graphic" of the WTC7 collapse. Take a close look at it and then a video of the actual collapse. The graphic is so far from what actually happened as to be laughable.
NIST page with graphic and full reports.
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/techbeat/tbx2008_1120_wtc7.htm
10 second video of the actual WTC7 collapse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A
Plus three very short clips you can view and download to watch closely.
http://www.wtc7.net/videos.html
NIST refused to release this, but was forced by court order a few weeks ago:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO1ps1mzU8o
9 fucking yrs. later. Unfucking believable.
Thanks Careless. The MSM is never going to show it. Disturbing piece of video.
There were two separate collapse events, though they were separated by only about a minute. All it would take to generate the effect you saw would be for one girder, or one support beam to collapse. The structure was sound enough to stand for some 50 seconds after that.
The heat from this fire was fantastic, not something you see in normal structural fires, and 7WTC burned from the basement, so it makes perfect sense that it collapsed into its own footprint. When the basement level support burns away, the building collapses into the big hole beneath it. This is pretty simple.
Yes, the US caused 9/11. No, they were not involved in the planning. This was simple blowback from US meddling in the Middle East. End of story. You want to make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen again? Dismantle our military empire. No need to go chasing fairy tales.
Ok so the fire that caused the building to collapse started in the lower floors, and the fire started to collapse the structure at the top of the building before it caused the bottom floors to collapse, and the building was 47 stories high. This defies logic.
Also WTC 4 & 6 didn't collapse, why? WTC 4 was burned completely yet the northern section didn't collapse, and it had debris fall on it too, crushing part of the building. This is the difference between normal collapse and demolition.
"7WTC burned from the basement"
Wouldn't this cause you to ask the question "why was it burning from the basement"? Are you saying that, as a result of two planes hitting two buildings that were not building 7, building 7 spontaneously caught fire, in the basement, and imploded, with no intervention or involvement whatsoever?
Really? Who's chasing the fairy tales dude? And keep in mind, I lost my brother because of this, I'd much rather blame somebody other than the government of the country I reside in.
Got any evidence to back up these claims? What reason do you have to believe "there were two seperate collapse events"?
Was there a thermometer in the building to back up your claim that "the heat from this fire was fantastic"?
Any video footage of these fires in the basement?
No, I thought not. You either just made all that up or popular mechanics made it up for you. The fires in WTC7 were regular office fires, nothing special about them, as you can imagine office fires aren't all that rare.
The NIST report on the collapse of WTC7 states that the building fell at free fall acceleration for at least one second, this means that for a full second of the collapse there was a net resistive force of ZERO acting against the collapse. The building had supportive beams inside it outer walls, these beams would have provided a significant resistive force to the collapse of the building. Therefore they must have been cut with explosives to allow the building to collapse in the manner it did.
This suggests that the building was brought down by controlled demolition not fires.
NIST was embarrassed into conceding technical free fall for 2.6 seconds, not 1 second. People who genuinely don't understand the significance of this are either ignorant, or simply incapable of understanding schoolboy level physics.
There weren't two separate collapse events. You can precisely measure when the collapse of WTC7 starts by measuring when the top corners of the building begin to drop. The entire collapse is only fractions of a second off free fall.
What these fake internet shill sites are trying to make out as two separate collapses is really the middle support being blown first (and the penthouse collapsing as a result), which is exactly what we would expect to see in a controlled demolition. This is done first to get the building collapsing in on itself.
What the believers in the government's 9/11 story are essentially claiming with regard to the WTC buildings is that we should ignore the scientific hypothesis that fits ALL of the available empirical evidence and go with the hypothesis that fits NONE of the available empirical evidence.
I don't get it.
Why is demolitions an occupation? Why don't we just set fire to skyscrapers and let them fall into their own footprints. Do you understand the non-linearity involved here?
What I am constantly being told and what I've read from NIST and others just doesn't match up with what my eyes see in the footage. I really think that if fires did cause the collapse, it would look very different.
You understand that the fire induced collapse theory was implanted into our brains from the moment the towers collapsed. It's kind of like predictive programming.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0wHeekgPqk
Then bush stands in front of the podium at the UN and declares:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOMKdILRM5I
Then we only need the self-policing populace to play their role and follow the leaders by beating into the dust any and every inquiry into the event.
You can pretend that your mind is invulnerable to the continual psychological operations brought upon you, or you can entertain the possibility that you too are being played.
I guess you missed the part where it was NOT a perfect collapse into it's own footprint. The dust wall was full of dangerous materials. Everyone that was exposed to it got sick. Downtown was wrecked for weeks. The economy almost collapsed.
False flags are great, but this one was a bit too spectacular to be one. If they had wanted a false flag, they would have sunk another navel vessel, assassinated the president, or some high up politico, or just about anything else.
In any event, even if you are right, you only look crazy by making this argument. That crazy will affect anything else you ever say.
I don't claim to know what happened, but I know enough to see that there is no bulletproof case for the government having been behind 9/11. There are too many things that could have gone wrong, and too many people would have had to be involved, and someone would have been horrified by the act and spoken out. This did not happen.
People don't want to accept Occums Razor. The simplest explanation is that a group of terrorists flew a couple of planes into a couple of buildings in response to decades of abuse from the USA. No nonsensical CIA operation required.
What I mean by 'perfect collapse into it's own footprint' is that it didn't tip over and smack the building next to it.
http://buildingwhat.org/
"there is no bulletproof case for the government having been behind 9/11"
I never stated that at all. I will state that the real fairy tale here is the official story. It is full of holes and unanswered questions.
"People don't want to accept Occums Razor" (sic)
I will accept occam's razor where it applies. However, I have found Occam's razor to be practically useless in the real world. It says don't over complicate things.
If you apply Occam's razor to the natural world, isn't it much simpler to say that God did everything than to try and develop quantum mechanics?
Occam's razor is nice, but its not compelling evidence of anything within this discussion.
Anyone up for Pancakes?
double
I cannot believe that this is even a topic of discussion till this date.
Let me tell you all a little freakiness.
Remember how all the steel was hauled away almost overnight (what was not smouldering for weeks on end). Instead of a test lab, it was sold to scrap dealers.
Well, a bunch of it came to India. On a flight one day, I sat next to the lawyers of one of the largest steel scrap importers in India. He said it was amazing the speed and price with which the deals went through.
7 years later, Otis installed thousands of radioactive steel buttons sourced from India.
Go figure...
ORI
http://aadivaahan.wordpress.com
Actually, not all all of the steel was shipped off.
More than 170 areas on the steel recovered from the Twin Towers were examined for evidence of fire exposure. According to NIST (http://wtc.nist.gov/media/PublicUpdateFinal.pdf), the steel was selected from the areas that experienced fire and impact damage, and was adequate for estimating the maximum temperature reached by the steel.
These tests revealed yet another huge problem for the believers in the government's 9/11 story: only 3 out of the 170 locations indicated temperatures above 250 C, and one of these three appeared to have experienced temperatures above 250 C after the collapse. There was no evidence on any of the steel examined of any temperatures above 600 C for any significant length of time. Since the physical evidence neglected to support NIST's pre-conceived conclusions, they just ignored it, and pulled the max temperatures used in their black box models out of their ass.
The fires were just what they appeared: diffuse, short-lived, oxygen-starved, with max temperatures about what we would expect for this kind of a fire. Neither hot enough nor lasting long enough to significantly weaken even unfireproofed structural steel.
tmosley, you are a scientist, and as you may have learned, science has no place in a faith-based debate.
Nobody cares than the tallest structure ever purposely brought down by explosives was 27 stories, and required hundreds of man-hours and access to every part of the structure to set the charges. Nobody wants to do the calcs on kinetic energy. Nobody wants to know how the structural integrity of steel is lessened by upwards of 60% hundreds of degrees below steel's melting point, but at temperatures created by burning office furniture and room fixtures. Nobody wants to see the photos of the south tower's top 35 floors buckling exactly where the jet struck it, towards the impact point, moments before that collapse initiated the fall of the entire structure. Nobody wants to know that aluminum can melt, mix with ancillary combustible material, then pour out of the buckling floors where the jet came to rest. Nobody wants to know that concentrating a lot of kj's of energy under pressure can cause fires to burn for weeks. Nobody wants to know that WTC7 was struck by debris from the falling twins, was on fire for hours, was built over a ConEdison substation, and had a structure that rested a majority of its weight on an internal atrium. Nobody wants to know that firefighters "pulled" their crews from WTC7 hours before it fell because they feared its imminent collapse.
Conspiracy is so much more fun, and it needn't make any sense. Hey, don't you know the BBC said WTC7 already fell when it was clearly visible in the background as their reporter spoke (this is silly nine ways from Sunday...."Dewey Defeats Truman!"). I wonder how many people knew what a WTC7 was on 9-10-2001, or even midway through 9-11 itself would know a WTC7 if they saw one? And wouldn't you think the collapse of two 110 story towers would be enough without tossing in WTC7 for good measure? I mean, if they really wanted spectacle, why bring the things down straight when they could have sent one toward Battery Park and the other toward SoHo? Could it be that large steel beam structures, as opposed to reinforced concrete structures like in Oklahoma, collapse exactly the way we saw on 911?
As for whistleblowers, don't you know that all those GS-13 to SISIII types at the CIA, who can earn upwards of $180K per year, are far too well off and infinitely too ruthless and sinister to spill their guts for a multimillion dollar fee? I mean, if they spoke they'd lose their license to kill, too.
Occams Razor indeed.
As you may be painfully aware, there is no room for debate on ZeroHedge. Just as George Bush sort of said, "you're either with us, or you're a paid disinformant".
chindit,
Once again we find you demonstrating your gross ignorance on this topic. The tallest building ever brought down by controlled demolition (before 9/11) was 47 stories, not 27 stories.
As far as all your hand waving about the integrity of steel and temperatures created by burning office furniture, there is no need for your uninformed speculation. NIST examined the steel from the impact and fire areas and found that the steel did not get even remotely as hot as you are suggesting.
Thermite could have been left over from the burn files, used to destroy sensitive documents in foreign embassy offices and bookie operations.
That's a bunch of useless distraction. The only FACT you need to know about the Twin Towers is that they collapsed at free-fall speeds. The ONLY way that can happen within the confines of the laws of physics, is by a controlled demolition.
Now that is interesting. An elegantly simple thought. Got a link?
Look up "Loose Change" on YouTube.
Link: http://www.youtube.com/user/ae911truth
Science can distradt you from fact-free conspiracy theory. Good thing you don't pollute your brain with uncomfortable realities. It could cause congitive dissonance.
Look in mirror, and repeat that statement over and over until you get it.
it's funny what the sub-conscious will disclose without permission
Science is as subject to manipulation as anything else. It depends on the data used and the integrity of the author. You are assuming that your government is all honorable intentions and actions. Have you been paying attention? The same government that told the people of New York to just vacuum up that white dust on their windowsills?
Science is not anymore authoritative than voodoo in the right hands. If you need additional data, read about medicine development for example. Great science there. To think, all it does is kill people. While not all climate data is wrong, it never helps when people admit to "fudging" the data to get the result they want. Is this the science you speak so highly of?
In the early sixties, the sugar manufacturers wanted a "scientific" report to support sugar being benign in its' effects. They went to Harvard. Bought them a building. Got their report. How about the "Negro brain is smaller than the Caucasian brain, therefore they are not as intelligent" science. Or, that Xrays will cure cancer science.
Science is a tool for discovery. When used as a religion to bludgeon the sensibilities of us all- it is immoral and deadly- like many religions (Catholic Church). A tool is only as good as its' master.
Thanks for teaching me the folly of relying on science to understand things. From now on I will get all my information from troofer youtube links. Unbiased, bitchez.
Here's all the Science you need to know, jackass--> Law of Gravity + Towers dropping at freefall speeds, verifiable on video with a stopwatch = You're an idiot.
I don't care.. All I care about is they found a passport that survived the crash of the plane and collapse of the building indicating the crazy Muslims that hate my freedom want to destroy my country were behind it.. /sarc
Correct... the passport survived the crash... neither the buildings nor the black boxes did... but thankfully the passports allow us to know who to blame.
But that isn't at all what he said. Perhaps you should read his post as closely as you claim to read the science.
"Thanks for teaching me the folly of relying on science to understand things. From now on I will get all my information from troofer youtube links. Unbiased, bitchez."
I junked this comment because there isn't a button for outrageous straw-man.
Herein lies your difficulty: you fail to read for comprehension. My post does not question the use of science, it questions the motives of the operator. If you cannot understand this, perhaps your intelligence is insufficient to benefit from the troofer youtube links?
You are uninterested or unable to understand the science involved. You also don't understand the scientific method (why scientific articles are peer-reviewed). You won't read them. You get to pick what you believe, but you don't get to pick the truth.
Btw, where are the peer-reviewed troofer articles?
ITG, guess which one is you....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nh33bGAxl58
That post was inevitable. We have a wonderful window into this world through "climate gate". I've read posts like this hundreds of times over the years directed towards Climate Change skeptics.
Your post was inevitable. Troofers invariably turn their back on peer-reviewed science because it doesn't support them. So they ignore it.
Like this peer-reviewed paper?
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
The Open Chemical Physics Journal. Bentham.org. Vol 2. 2009. pp.7-31 (25)
Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen
Sean7k
Well said.
That is what it boils down to. Collapsed at free fall speed.
Forget about the rest of it. Explain how that happened and
you will have my undying gratitude.
They can't.
This is why they always turn to personal ad hominem attacks and endless name calling. They aren't trying to convince you to change your views. They simply want to keep the undecided and wavering away by promising them through example that they'll be viciously attacked if they cross over. For those who don't like to be verbally or emotionally assaulted, that's enough to keep them safely within the "I don't want to get involved in this" side lines.
Mission accomplished.
You forgot a link to about Solomon Brothers building.
"A plane went down with out attacking, a building went down with out being attacked"
http://right-thinking.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/177/
ITG, This is a religious debate, as in "my expert is greater than your expert".
Here is a better version...
Suspect Package Found at Merkel's Office Published: Tuesday, 2 Nov 2010 | 11:30 AM ET Text Size By: ReutersGerman police found a suspicious package in the post at Chancellor Angela Merkel's office in Berlin on Tuesday, a government spokesman said.
Merkel was not in the building at the time.
"A suspicious package was found in the post office of the chancellery," the spokesman said. "It can't be ruled out that the package contains explosives. The investigation is continuing. No one has been injured."
A Reuters photographer saw police tighten security measures outside the central Berlin office of Merkel, who was out of the country at the time on a visit to Belgium.
Now, was that so hard? Thanks Monmick.
Teach a politician how to create fire ... keep them warm for a night.
Set a politician on fire ... keep them warm for the rest of their life.
Chad, is that you?
[30/October/2010]
SANA'A, Oct. 30 (Saba) – No UPS cargo planes left Yemen to other countries in the last days and there are no direct flights from Yemen to the United Kingdom or the United States, a Yemeni official said, after allegations that British and U.S. officials had found suspicious packages on planes that originated in Yemen.
The official wondered how the media mentioned the name of Yemen reporting that an explosive device was found onboard a cargo plane that landed in London coming from Yemen.
UPS planes never land or take off in Yemen, the official made clear.
The security measures at Yemeni airports are tightened and the authorities search passengers and luggage well, the official said, adding that Yemen has recently installed modern checking systems that can detect dangerous or suspicious materials to the safety of passengers and planes.
We urge the media not to make hasty judgments about sensitive issues and the media should wait until investigations reveal the truth, the official said, as he pointed out that Yemen has launched an investigation into the allegations and planned to coordinate with the United Arab Emirates, Britain and the U.S. over the issue.
Yemen is determined to continue the war on terror in cooperation with the international community until it roots out all terrorists who pose threat to all, the official concluded.
http://www.sabanews.net/en/news227621.htm
suspicious bear package. cross dresser.
http://www.vermontteddybear.com/SellGroup/Good-Wishes-Fairy.aspx
Only for Careless.
http://www.commercialappeal.com/photos/galleries/2010/oct/26/georges-reunion/?partner=popular
The Asparagus Song!
Lloydie, Lloydie, they be doin' God's work!
(walking about shaking hands high above head, singing, suffused with the Power of the Great Ponz in the Sky... giggle giggle snort snort)
Suspicious package, drag queens, penal farms, asparagus, we've got a theme developing here.
thanks for the gallery ms; looks like a festive time. of course i had to play the right backround music while viewing...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Faf1ch7Q9XE
Excellent music choice! Perfect.
go long IED's in the mail, the next bull market, it's so obvious it is coming to a place near you
IED technological advances have now passed the 7 year mark, where it will now doulbe every 18 months in incremental improvements
gotta love that war on terror
The good news is that more and more people are not paying attention to these blatantly false flag actions. Of course there may be a "message" in there for Merkel, since she had that other incident at her country home where some nut was trying to get her his "love letters".
As for the Yemen thing, the foreign minister said that there were no direct Fedex or UPS flights out of Yemen, so he's really surprised a bunch of toner cartridges got to where they were going...
November 7th is election day in Greece.
The Socialist Goverment tries to avoid defeat.
Greek Gvnt is absent and the antiauthoritarians are once again playing games with fireworks so that Greeks are scared and don't vote.
Socialists in Greece are trying to cause havoc instead of stepping out of power.
Does the rest of the country have the "Report Suspicious activity, dial......" electric roadsigns over the highways like we have around the beltway? The bogeymen are everywhere-be afraid sheep. Pissing me off.
No, we have Deer Crossing and "This road that was just repaved last year is being repaved this year as part of the ARRA" signs.
No, but we have some newly installed Federally Funded stop signs the perimeters of which are adorned with red LED lights that blink about every half second throwing selected unsuspecting motorists into epileptic seizures in violation of the Americans With Disabilitites Act.
Awesome!
I've seen those...so bright you can barely stand to look at them in the daytime. Installing these things must have been the government's response to the bullshit excuse of numerous ticketed motorists..."I swear officer, I didn't see the stop sign."
Well okay, but they do stop. In a ditch. And it's business for the tow companies pulling the cars out.
I want to report a suspicious W-2...
Dateline 2040: The department of homefart security today found three million unexploded bombs which had been criss-crossing the globe for thirty years. In a statement issued yesterday they said there is reason for panic so everyone should vote for the incumbent, or else.
One big false flag event and I'm sure the government will have us handing over our guns. This because they cannot tell which one of us is a terrorist.
Stun Gun
So at some point, and relatively soon, I think... one of these near misses has to be a direct hit, no? Something about a little boy and wolf, if memory serves correctly.
Merkel was expecting a bomb from Greece's FinMin... but not this kind.
(Beggars can't be choosers? Hah!)
Cool it, everyone. Greece has an unfavorable foreign trade balance -- so now it's
exporting explosives. What IS the matter with you people.
One bomb to reach them all
one bomb to dazzle 'em
One bomb to scare them stiff
and in the ballots bind them
Yeah, yeah, Angela--I got yer package, right heah...
Finally. I'm surprised it took the ZH community this long to make the obvious "package" joke.
Most of us have seen Merkel. Some jokes aren't worth it...
It's too close to lunch for that sort of talk, mate.
The whole Bernake with the package of trillion dollar notes as well. Get with it people!
hahah, who the hell throws a bomb?
"Quick somebody toss it in the courtyard!"
http://movieclips.com/opd7-the-pink-panther-strikes-again-movie-clouseaus-hot-air/
+1
lol, how silly of me...
The German word order hard to read this article makes.
Adderall helps.
Trouble I have not.
- Yoda
So somebody from Yemen or anywhere else in the world can mail something to a President or Prime Minister of a country and it will actually get there??? Makes me wonder where all those letters to Santa went when I was a kid...
That sums it up nicely. World class terrorists have no stronger grip on reality than a 4 year old child, if we are to believe what we're hearing.
They don't have a strong grip in our reality. As an example. The anthrax letters mailed a few days after 9-11 were sent to congress and "American Media". Sadly, American Media is the corporate name for the National Enquirer. The idiots assumed that American Media meant all state controlled media outlets. If they had any clue they would have sent the letters to the New York Times.
Good God! Is nothing sacred?
Relax everyone, crisis over...it was only a pair of furry handcuffs.
So that's where my "special handling" shipment got to.
Dammit, they promised me they would be discrete.
Angela must have order something from the same place. Wires crossed. Happens all the time, funny too when it does.
So you got her stainless steel chastity belt I take it? Send us pics m'kay?