This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

UN Security Council Authorizes Libya No-Fly Zone: 10 For 5 Abstain 0 Against

Tyler Durden's picture


The vote by the UN Security Council to
impose a no-fly zone on Libya and take "all necessary measures" to
protect Libyan civilians from government-led attacks, has passed with a vote of 10 to 5. The vote "will also allow military intervention to enforce the
ban, and calls to take "all necessary measures" to protect civilians and
civilian populated areas under threat of attack." The UN Security Council Resolution was backed by 10 countries, enough
to pass, while 5 other countries - including Russia, China and Germany -
chose to abstain. None voted against. Next up: CNN's ratings go through the roof as everyone picks up where they left off in the Gulf War with watching 1st person perspectives of bombing sorties taking out various Libyan targets. German planes however will be missing: Merkel's state refuses to participate at all in the bombing.

Below, Al Jazeera live footage of Benghazi rejoicing:

From BBC:

British forces could be in action over Libya as early as Friday, if a UN resolution is agreed, a senior government source has told the BBC.

BBC political editor Nick Robinson said the source stressed talks were continuing and it could take longer, but would be within days of a yes vote.

The UN Security Council is due to vote imminently on whether to authorise a no-fly zone in Libya.

Russia and China are expected to abstain, rather than use their veto.

The vote comes as Col Gaddafi warned people in rebel stronghold Benghazi his troops are coming "tonight" and there would be "no mercy" - he told rebels that those who laid down their weapons would be pardoned.

Senior UN sources said British and French war planes could be in the air within hours to carry out initial air raids on Libyan positions, if the resolution is passed, possibly with logistical support from Arab allies.


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:44 | 1068757 Scottj88
Scottj88's picture

Ron Paul


Anything else is useless

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:57 | 1068823 boooyaaaah
boooyaaaah's picture

Ageed to the shores of Tripoli


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:57 | 1068836 Mark McGoldrick
Mark McGoldrick's picture

Libertarians will drag us into the dark ages. 

Bunch of ham aficionados and their "time machine politics."  

Back to the 1800's - That's the answer!  Yeah, right. 

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:03 | 1068885 Calmyourself
Calmyourself's picture

Liberals will drag us into the new slave ages and then gnash their teeth and wonder why.. Such child like thinking, amusing but dangerous.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:06 | 1068900 Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

A junk for your careless use of labels and for stereotyping "libertarians".

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:12 | 1068924 Dangertime
Dangertime's picture

Libertarians believe in freedom.  Anything else is just a different type of slavery.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:22 | 1068978 Founders Keeper
Founders Keeper's picture

[Libertarians will drag us into the dark ages.]---Mark McGoldrick

For me, it's Liberty or Death.

Sounds like you've made your choice. Good luck with that.


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:27 | 1068991 InconvenientCou...
InconvenientCounterParty's picture

Hey, guess what! An advanced race of aliens just landed!

They've overcome the bullshit animal spirits causing all our troubles.


They said the secret recipie is to reject all progressivism and stop changing! In fact, it's even better to turn back the clock and regress!

ROaLMBFAO! cough-hack-hock




Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:47 | 1069341 Freewheelin Franklin
Freewheelin Franklin's picture

What's the record at ZH for "junk"?

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 23:44 | 1069972 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

I'm wondering rms junks. (that's square-root-of-the-sum-of-the-squares all y'all)

and this is labeled as "Hillary's War"

someone had to fill out his ladderz b4 the deadline.

- Ned

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:02 | 1068863 crazyjsmith
crazyjsmith's picture

Shock and Awe II : The Empire strikes Back!

Where's my popcorn?

Wait, this doesn't look like Hoth?
It looks more like Tatooine.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:30 | 1069268 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

and what if the rebels still lose??    isn't this no-fly zone just suppose to make it a fair fight??

From what I saw, the rebels do not really know how to be a complete unit so they'll be asking for a fly zone of U.N. bombers so they can just walk right into Tripoli

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 21:17 | 1069447 Ropingdown
Ropingdown's picture

The UN resolution is meant to take the weapons out of the hands of the Gadaffi gang.  And superior weapons are all they have.  The first rule of war (and street fights) is that if you find yourself in a fair fight, you've made a big mistake.  Clear out the mercenaries.  Burn the tanks.  Melt the artillery.  When a dictator proves utterly ruthless, and then threatens to terrorize the Meditteranean "for years" if we intervene, then the intervention will be fast, brutal, and continue until the thug, his children and his loyalists are gone.  "Making it a fair fight"  isn't the point.  Illiminating the creator of the unfair fight is the point.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 21:39 | 1069566 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

so its just a proxy war.. who can tell who's a thug anymore..  its not like if we win we get 50 cent oil - nope - just Big Oil gets to get the profits instead of the sand puppets

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 00:43 | 1070098 Ropingdown
Ropingdown's picture

I can tell Qaddafi, his sons, and his mercenaries are thugs and I'm sure you can, too.  Without 'big oil' you wouldn't have much of a life.  Iraq, certainly, was a war to take a proven aggressor off Saudi's flank.  Libya is a different issue.  Our commitments are lower and our participation as an "air only" force is vastly less expensive.  Proxy war? Stabilizing north Africa?  Do you need 50 cent oil to justify aiding a rebellion against a terrorist and brutal tyrant?  What are we liberating in Afghanistan?  Nothing.  A useless war fought because Dems and Independents could get behind the "al Queda trained there" rubbish.  A huge pointless war.  Air support in Libya?  Sensible and relatively cheap.

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 01:34 | 1070211 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

but, amusingly, we (and our power elite) have no idea if whoever replaces the colonel, etc. will be, in practical terms, better "friends" with the u.s. or, more importantly, israel.  ditto every other place currently in flux, including iraq and afghanistan.

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 04:13 | 1070375 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

rebellion against a terrorist and brutal tyrant?


No rebellion. Only illegal combatants.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 22:18 | 1069704 nmewn
nmewn's picture

I don't know what I hate more...UN posturing or Qwackdaffy's megalomania.

The only thing we know for sure (as the ME fire rages on) is Qwackdaffy's nurse made a good house call and got the hell out of Dodge.

Who said blonde's are dumb ;-)

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 00:46 | 1070106 Ropingdown
Ropingdown's picture

Agree with the "don't know what I hate more..."

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 05:54 | 1070486 nmewn
nmewn's picture

Everything the UN does turns into a giant clusterfuck of inefficiency and incompetence.

This will be no different...mark my words.

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 07:59 | 1070600 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

Don't forget the posturing, or the preening.

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 18:56 | 1073769 nmewn
nmewn's picture the looks of the news today, a few more meetings in Europe are needed to complete this current fashion show.

I have always wondered...when the UN commits "war crimes" where is the trial held and who are the judges, prosecutors and jurors?

But I suppose we've already found that out from the rapes & tortures their troops have committed around the globe...ahhh well.


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:47 | 1068765 cossack55
cossack55's picture

Libyan civilians. I thought they were the rebels. Soon to be known as "The War of Euro Aggression".  Bonnie Green Flag anyone?

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:50 | 1068783 TeamAmerica
TeamAmerica's picture

How soon?   I wonder if the bombers were orbiting, waiting for the go code...

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:02 | 1068867 serotonindumptruck
serotonindumptruck's picture

More than likely. This vote was just a formality. The military planners have had a few weeks to hammer out the various bombing missions.

"Weapons are free. You are go for launch."

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 07:59 | 1070606 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

If you are talking about "UN" military planners, don't expect brilliance.   There wil be no effective unity of command in this clusterfuck.

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 04:17 | 1070376 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

They are not even rebels. They are illegal combatants by the standards set by the US.


Duplicity is the only US legacy to the world.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:48 | 1068766 Steaming_Wookie_Doo
Steaming_Wookie_Doo's picture

Ummm, so how long will it take to set up no-fly zones for Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, who have also attacked their peaceful civilian protesters? *crickets chirping*

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:50 | 1068784 tahoebumsmith
tahoebumsmith's picture

And lets not forget Iran either

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:50 | 1068788 ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Yeah, that was my question: what about Bahrain?

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:39 | 1069059 Max Hunter
Max Hunter's picture

Bahrain has unruly migrant workers, like Saudi Arabia.  Libya has freedom fighters... Uhhhum.. yeah.. that's it..

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 08:03 | 1070615 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

No such thing as an islamic freedom fighter.   Islam and freedom are mutually exclusive, forever anathema to each other.      Islam infected soldiers might better be described as "tyranny fighters" as is in, fighting for tyranny.    These are not freedom agenda guys.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:57 | 1069134 scaleindependent
scaleindependent's picture

(16:53 PM)In Separate News. The UN Security Council has suddenly become tired of North Koreas' maltreatment of its own peoples, after over 50 years,  and has voted 15-0, with no abstainers to invade and liberate the people of North Korea.

UPDATE at 16:55 PM: THE UN Security Council has cancelled the above invasion order of North Korea after a detailed review of North Korea's petroleum reserves.  THe UN Security Council will heretofore conduct a detailed review of all petroleum reserves in despotic nations.


(goodfaceinvestah, good to see you. keep on posting)

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:05 | 1069138 chinaguy
chinaguy's picture

Ghostface - Yeah, that was my thought too...You can junk me too you fools..

and the cost of those those 5 Abstains...

well, that, did not come out of the pockets of the wealthy...any takers?


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:57 | 1068833 morph
morph's picture

Ah but were on good terms with them, so they can murder all the civilians they like.

And as for Zimbabwe, who cares about the people there, they don't have oil!

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 04:21 | 1070377 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

In Bahrain and SA, those guys are terrorists, even though some of them were shot while demonstrating with no guns at belt, just yelling and marching on streets.

The US and co can not even face up they are supporting a bunch of illegal combatants in Libya, illegal combatants who are hiding among civilians etc All the package...


Since the US inception, a new category has risen: non humans.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:48 | 1068772 TWORIVER
TWORIVER's picture

cool when the jiffy pop blows in japan everyone will be looking over here. full moon on saturday, can't wait to see this surreal painting come to life. not.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:50 | 1068779 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

WWIII bitches

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:58 | 1068824 PhattyBuoy
PhattyBuoy's picture

Bombs away !

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:59 | 1068838 camaro68ss
camaro68ss's picture

Its WWIII "Bitchez" you forgot the "Z"

its ok, im here for you

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:08 | 1068902 Rainman
Rainman's picture

...finally a good reason to upgrade all my personal bad habits. Eureka !! 

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:29 | 1069010 Dollar Bill Hiccup
Dollar Bill Hiccup's picture

World War III would require global participation across multiple fronts.

Hmmm. Why don't you come up with something more accurate for a description?

"Remember the Maine" while quite possibly inaccurate in a causal sense (since it was a false flag for all intensive purposes), is probably a better comparison to "Remember Lockerbie" than the hyperbole of global conflagration. 

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:50 | 1069074 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

World Wars have a quaint way of starting just like this.

The conditions are ripe as they have ever been:

  • Very high inflation
  • Broad based unrest
  • Extremely polarized views both domestically and abroad
  • Very high global unemployment
  • And now we have a war (with three major powers staying out of the vote) If you want me to be exact we have 3 wars now in 3 different countries: Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Libya, with revolutions occuring in other nations including Bahrain/Saudi (which are kinda' at war with eachother)

Looks like the start to a world war if I've ever seen one. What exactly are you witnessing that makes my statement less than accurate?

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 07:24 | 1070524 Dollar Bill Hiccup
Dollar Bill Hiccup's picture

Sorry Bob, it's hyperbolic.

You have to have someone who is both willing and capable of fighting the US and its allies globally. We are not there yet. Not even close.

While things may point to future problems and divergences, the near future is another proxy / post colonial action. 

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 08:08 | 1070626 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

I think it takes two sides to have a "war".      In the Libyan army you have, how to put it to scale, a few stray bacteria against a pallet of clorox(any one US aircraft carrier or fighter wing).

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 01:42 | 1070223 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

yes, all they did was assassinate an archduke....  and it's "intents and purposes".

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 08:18 | 1070652 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

Back then the theory of war had every side "mobilized" because of the argument that the country that was mobilised first could obviously win quickly.   Wrong, the tank had not been invented yet, but the entrenchment tool or "shovel" had been around for a while.   Anyway, they prepared to win back then by having large standing armies which were meant to swing into action quicker than the ennemy.    

In the last several decades, Libya prepared to not lose, up to now, by being a member of the UN, which granted them inviolable sovereignty under "international law" behind which to operate their sordid grinding dictatorship, psychostate horrors, and of course terrorism activities.     So the UN isn't entirely useless:   It protects and coddles evil for long stretches of time.   

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:50 | 1068789 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

10 hypocrites with 5 hypocrites who wish to remain blameless just as long as they can sell arms to both sides as well. The war business of the globe thus continues. All that's left is the speeches declaring they did it for the women and ......wait for it.....children.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:56 | 1068819 Misean
Misean's picture

Let us not forget all of the heroic loans for the needed reconstruction of the new satrap's palaces and ministries, and embasies on the Med coast.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:38 | 1069307 Element
Element's picture

Oh that, that's just nation building

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 01:43 | 1070225 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

ok then

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:48 | 1069101 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

10 to the 5: "You want a hit of this?" *cough cough*

5: "Oh, thanks. Go right ahead. I'm keeping watch. You can trust me."

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:51 | 1068791 Tail Dogging The Wag
Tail Dogging The Wag's picture

Guess Benghazi won't become the new Stalingrad afterall.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:01 | 1068856 Highrev
Highrev's picture

It's only a no-fly zone.

The chances of a new Stalingrad are even better now.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:36 | 1069290 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

so when the rebels realize they still have to fight they'll be askin daddy U.N. for more more more more

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 21:20 | 1069467 Ropingdown
Ropingdown's picture

Apparently you missed the headlines.  It's a no-drive zone.  It's a no-Gadaffi zone.  It's a no-subsaharan mercenaries zone. 

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 04:21 | 1070379 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

I wonder how the side supported by the US and co is going to distinguish subsaharan mercenaries with undocumented subsaharan workers living in Libya. Going to be fun.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:51 | 1068792 sulfur
sulfur's picture

of course germany doesnt vow against lybia they sell weapons to them

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:35 | 1069294 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

so no fly zone, but what about the mustard gas???

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:52 | 1068796 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

Sarkozy last seen climbing into the cockpit of a Dassault Mirage 2000N...

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:59 | 1068841 TradingJoe
TradingJoe's picture

Personally I prefer Raffale!

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:03 | 1068872 boooyaaaah
boooyaaaah's picture

Soros meddling

What does this really mean

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:51 | 1068799 tahoebumsmith
tahoebumsmith's picture

First casualty, Libyan oil fields...should see the black smoke soon

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:21 | 1068963 Rainman
Rainman's picture

Speaking of black smoke, Obeyme must have figured out by now that a wartime Prez is 50 times more likely to be regurgitated into a second term. The UNSC has always been a straw dog for under the table US foreign policy. Suspicion is warranted.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:34 | 1069028 johnQpublic
johnQpublic's picture

but..but...but.....he got a nobel peace prize....





prematurely says captain obvious

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 01:48 | 1070236 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

it can be tricky though; timing and momentum are crucial.  about two thirds of the u.s. now say the war in afghanistan is not worth continuing but majorities support action in libya and iran.  the populace is still bellicose but it seems the staying power is contracting. 

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:21 | 1068973 avonaltendorf
avonaltendorf's picture

Point of information: There is nothing anyone can do with fire or explosives to the oil 15,000 ft under the ground.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:53 | 1068801 ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Also, what about Pittsburgh - they attacked peaceful protesters recently as well.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:43 | 1069080 Max Hunter
Max Hunter's picture

I was thinking of that the other day. When Clinton was talking about the rights of protesters. I was wishing someone would interview her with clips from Pittsburgh and ask her the same questions. Without telling here where the clips were from..

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:55 | 1068808 virgilcaine
virgilcaine's picture

Saddam and sons mission.. redo.!

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:55 | 1068810 eureka
eureka's picture

To be or not to be an international community of law and order; Libertarianism has no solution for international conflict resolution, except political and philosophical provicialism - not exactly an adequate stance in the age of global casino capitalism. While Libertarianism works on upgrading its related dogma, consider that U.N. action in Libya may align with the Libyan people's legimate demand for democracy.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:06 | 1068890 boooyaaaah
boooyaaaah's picture

15 days too late

It's all over but the wheeling and dealing

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 08:24 | 1070671 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

Exactly right.   The UN swung into action just in permit them to posture and preen.    See, they are there as a force for good, an intergalactic peacekeeping and humanitarian armada that swoops in after much of the damage is done to queen about in their baby blue helmets to protect the guilty from any sort of agression.   Take the UN mission in southern lebanon for example.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:41 | 1069061 Ricky Bobby
Ricky Bobby's picture

OH I see America had no choice but to become an Empire.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:46 | 1069100 DiverCity
DiverCity's picture

Whose law, jackass?  Just exactly where is the need for "international conflict resolution" in this case, you stupid moron?  It's a civil war you jackass clown!  Why is it our business, you sick fuck?  Fucking do gooders always want to stick their noses in where it doesn't belong and risk shedding my son's blood in some god-forsaken shit hole. 

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 21:27 | 1069490 Ropingdown
Ropingdown's picture

Your son is in the military? 

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 01:57 | 1070249 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

good points.  another is the law of unintended consequences.  somewhat applicable to this area and of some historical irony:  to protect the jews after the ravages of the nazis the u.s. was instrumental in creating israel which, over time, led to the only place in the world where jews are killed regularly for being jews.  and as a bonus, the u.s. is hated by the people who sit on top of two thirds of the world's accessible oil reserves.  

genius is knowing when to stop.

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 04:23 | 1070380 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

 consider that U.N. action in Libya may align with the Libyan people's legimate demand for democracy.


If it is legitimate, how do you explain the illegal combatants?

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 08:27 | 1070676 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

Riiiight.    Pissed off armed young men in an islamic country...any islamic country, are fighting for "democracy."    Get back to us when you find an actual case of that.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:56 | 1068814 Mercury
Mercury's picture

I will eat my hat, wings and all if the US gets directly, militarily involved here.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:57 | 1068821 Misean
Misean's picture

You want me to send you some Tapatio for that?

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:59 | 1068849 Mercury
Mercury's picture

Well, we'll see.  I'm not talking about a vaguely defined "support" role here but planes in the sky over Libya that deploy ordinance that can kill people and/or troops on the ground...

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:04 | 1068879 TeamAmerica
TeamAmerica's picture

The U.N. resolution specifically forbids troops on the ground (or at least no "occupation force", for what that's worth).

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:06 | 1068899 Misean
Misean's picture

Need troops on the ground to! For downtrowdened Muslim gyrlz!...yeah, that's the ticket.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 22:06 | 1069664 samsara
samsara's picture

Ya, and we were never in Laos either.

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 08:29 | 1070685 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

John Kerry was though, on Christmas Eve, listening to Nixon's speech on the radio.   See he ferried a spec ops guy up the river.   Used to carry his beret around in a briefcase for years.    So, yeah, "we" were in Laos, "illegally" as they say (which always cracks me up).

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:07 | 1068903 Misean
Misean's picture

You are obviously unfamiliar with what TWO US aircraft carriers carry?

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:28 | 1069003 Rainman
Rainman's picture

+ 15 nukes

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:01 | 1068866 TeamAmerica
TeamAmerica's picture

You're saying the USA won't participate in the air campaign?   Hope that hat tastes good...

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:05 | 1068886 velobabe
velobabe's picture

and to think oBam_mame, will be teeing it up in R I O † when we are going to war. gee, get out of the northern hemisphere.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:10 | 1068912 boooyaaaah
boooyaaaah's picture

That's right he has an alibi, for the debates

Hillary got us into this war

Not Like G Bush, he fights like a man

But at least G Bush ended the war in Iraq

and maybe Afghanistan -- if he had a 3rd term

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:51 | 1069120 ZakuKommander
ZakuKommander's picture

His Vietnam campaign medals testify to his manliness!

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 01:58 | 1070251 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

purple barstool with a nose candy cluster.

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 08:33 | 1070689 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

And here we thought it was John Kerry who was posturing as a Vietnam war hero.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:07 | 1069165 SuperRay
SuperRay's picture

wow, your head must be so far up your ass you can lick your small intestine. You think the iraq war is over? you think bush ended the war? Let me guess - you are G Bush, aren't you. and you think because you wrote five sentences with no periods that you're a poet?  Go back to fucked news, dude, and don't waste our time...

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 08:35 | 1070705 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

The war was over in about three weeks dude.   Since then we have been in a "war" under the new MSM definition.    Excuse me if I insist on putting scare quotes around it, but that is where we are with these long occupations of savage lands.    It would take a generation of policing and protecting communities, court houses and school buildings to set any of these islam infested tribal shit holes onward toward indoor plumbing and underground sewerage.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:29 | 1069266 Hicham
Hicham's picture

Fuck is up with you guys and Obama golfing? You realize how much bush also golfed? It's a presidential pastime/traditiono to golf while the world burns.

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 02:02 | 1070256 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

the last even halfway decent president the u.s. had, imo, dwight eisenhower, also golfed.  it's what the president does that counts. but these last two or three or four or five or six....

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 08:36 | 1070711 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

Obama does it an order of magnitude more frequently, dude.    Dose makes the poison.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:04 | 1068887 John Law Lives
John Law Lives's picture

Are you serious?  Why do you think Hillary Clinton strongly supported this?


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 21:18 | 1069022 Mercury
Mercury's picture

We're talking about politicians here folks - sometimes they say things that don't quite line up with reality.  And Hillary (whom I'm sure would eat babies on live TV if it would get her the right job) isn't in charge here.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:57 | 1068820 scratch_and_sniff
scratch_and_sniff's picture

Bahrain next, if the people want democracy, democracy they shall have! (lets see how they like it, i give it 6 months before they will be screaming "come back gaddafi, all is forgiven")

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:56 | 1068822 kengland
kengland's picture

They will come for your kids someday.


We have no business at all there. Why are we not in the Congo, Liberia or Zimbabwe? How about Georgia? There are grass root revolutions everywhere, but nothing?


On a side note, anybody have a reliable wind map for the fallout?


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:01 | 1068869 Bubbles...bubbl...
Bubbles...bubbles everywhere's picture

Do they have oil?

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:07 | 1068896 kengland
kengland's picture

Off the coast of Liberia...yeah

Zimbabwe and Congo are wealthy as all get it with nat resources...


So why not? Chinese investment. It's already taken. The new colonialism





Fri, 03/18/2011 - 04:26 | 1070381 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

On the contrary. The fact the Chinese are invested in those areas could be a cause to topple the regime as it would allow to clear all previous contracts (see Iraq or Sudan for the scheme)


Why no intervention? Because the resources flow out of these countries undisturbed, no matter the wars and all. This is what matters in this US driven world order.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:12 | 1068922 serotonindumptruck
serotonindumptruck's picture

"On a side note, anybody have a reliable wind map for the fallout?"

Not a wind map, but a frightening forecast model.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:20 | 1068955 kengland
kengland's picture

Thanks. Are you using that one? I have the bookmarked but am still looking for something that has a forecast element to it.


Again, thanks for responding.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 21:18 | 1069456 Smaug
Smaug's picture

I love the fact that the U.S. is now backing groups that hate us.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:57 | 1068830 Highrev
Highrev's picture

Watching a late night news/analysis program here in Spain and they've already gone back to Fukushima.

Spooky Dude and Co. have got to step things up a notch in Libya or they're not going to have viewers.

Stiff “prime time” competition there.


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:59 | 1068851 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

I was thinking that.

Strange time to finally decide to attack Libya.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:58 | 1068832 John Law Lives
John Law Lives's picture

"all necessary measures" = more Congressional spending to fuel military-industrial complex

General Smedley Butler: "War is a racket"

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:54 | 1069128 Rainman
Rainman's picture

Spot on. This political philosophy of halting thousands of years of history of Muslim tribes killing one another is nonsense the defense industry celebrates. Now it's even better for them....everybody can shoot at each other with weapons that sport the same manufacturer's stamp.

Oil money built this MidEast house of cards. Only a strongly financed and corrupt military leader can rule it by force, just like Saddam, Daffy and Mubarak. They'll all be replaced by the same or worse. That's just the way it is. Either level it and occupy it or stay the fuck away and each defend their homeland without mercy to invaders.  

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 09:19 | 1070881 Phlash
Phlash's picture

Thanks John Law Lives,

You've just prompted me to buy the Smedley Butler book from Amazon, been meaning to do that for a while.


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:57 | 1068837 chump666
chump666's picture

crosses slaughtered.  nice.  market will be looking for an oil bid overkill.

bets on oil fields will burn..ala Libyan armed forces doing something stupid.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:59 | 1068843 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

Are the oil fields on fire yet?

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:02 | 1068877 chump666
chump666's picture

speculation that madman Gadhafi lights one up...what better way to tell the west to F*** off.

G7 conference call news next. rumor:  US ala another madman Bernanke will initiate a major USD swap...try and bring the YEN down.  That happens oil is going to 120.  Japan recovery = 0, US = something is gotta give now.

Doomsday trades ahead.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:13 | 1068928 PhattyBuoy
PhattyBuoy's picture

Kdaffy "lights one up" - over Saudi, or Israel ?


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:17 | 1069204 Lord Welligton
Lord Welligton's picture

Patience dear boy. Patience.

A plane load of gold my convince the man.

I'd say the explosives are already in place.

The negotiations begin.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 18:59 | 1068845 chump666
chump666's picture

we got major HFT selling...check your charts.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:00 | 1068852 matthylland
matthylland's picture

Germany is missing a great training opportunity for their air force....

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:00 | 1068855 eureka
eureka's picture

Libyan rebels had more momentum (all of eastern Libya) than any of the other Arab rebellions mentioned comparatively - that's why they get the U.N. 'help' - like economics, size matters.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:35 | 1069029 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

They get help because certain parties want to turn Libya into chaos. The Rothschilds want to steal all of the oil etc. Gadaffi was useful at a time, but now they want him out.  So the puppet respond to the puppeteer moving their strings and we get ourselves into another war, and charge it our national credit card. Mark my words. This will not be pretty. His sons and el presidente have already indicated if they do this, that Libya will not be a piece of cake for them.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:00 | 1068860 Bubbles...bubbl...
Bubbles...bubbles everywhere's picture

This will do wonders to the budget.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:02 | 1068865 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Because things weren't crazy enough.  Dial the instability dial to 11 and rock out!  I deeply hope Russia got Libya some good AA, would be one hell of a surprise for NATO to actually lose aircraft.  Then we get the oh so sweet and yummy ground engagements we all know and love.

Hey here is an idea, why not declare Libya Japan 2, and move Japan over?  Would bring the GDP average of Africa up and Japan loves gigantic public works projects.  Win win!  Well unless you happen to be among the evicted, but since when does the West care about land ownership if it gets in the way of a good plan?  Besides I'm sure the EU would welcome the refugees with open arms, right?

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:03 | 1068883 kengland
kengland's picture

"Hey here is an idea, why not declare Libya Japan 2, and move Japan over? "


We could call that "Jasrial"

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:07 | 1068904 Deepskyy
Deepskyy's picture

Tomahawks Bitchez


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:08 | 1068906 AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

do you think he'd respect the Geneva Conventions?

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:15 | 1068936 Dangertime
Dangertime's picture

I actually like this idea.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:03 | 1068868 ThirdCoastSurfer
ThirdCoastSurfer's picture

I know it's a sensitive subject, but Japan should be directed to do the bombing. 

Most of the cost (of just the act of bombing) is a fixed cost as the bombs and planes and personnel are already paid for and it would secretly be a great moral lift to the country to "kick a dog". It would stymie Libya's ability to blame the US and might create ties and alliances that cannot be foreseen -of course this last part is exactly why the US will insist on doing it whatever the long term consequences might be.  

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:02 | 1068871 Lapri
Lapri's picture

great shot of Bengazhi celebration and Libya State TV people slumped in their seats..LOL.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:35 | 1069037 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

Fools. they celebrate the death of their own nation.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:04 | 1068884 Thepnr
Thepnr's picture

This is a disaster waiting to happen, though all could see it coming. As an earlier poster said the hypocricy is incredible when they ignore the current turmoil in Yemen and Bahrain yet chose not to enforce no fly zones over these countries.

This is only a precursor to getting rid of Ghaddafi, I have no problem with that but doing it this way is to me a massive mistake. What can be the ultimate aim of this strategy, fucked if I know.


Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:01 | 1069148 scaleindependent
scaleindependent's picture

Sweet, sweet oil.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:05 | 1068888 Silverhog
Silverhog's picture

Fail Safe. open your envelope, a big tent in northeastern Libya.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:05 | 1068894 AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

rest assured he'll roll over and concede, if nothing else he's rational and balanced - alternatively none of the above and he will draw straws  - good thing Valletta is well protected by the rocky ramparts of St. Elmo .. it worked against the Turks, at least for a few weeks but then again that was before planes and missiles

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:06 | 1068897 walküre
walküre's picture

Price of oil skyrocketing following the vote.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:06 | 1068898 eureka
eureka's picture

The Lybian rebels AND the Arab League ASKED for the this - major difference.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:18 | 1068954 boooyaaaah
boooyaaaah's picture

That's right this time its different

Didn't Obama say the price of electricty would sky rocket. No Nukes , No oil from the Gulf, No Nukes, No oil from the Middle east

Lefties start war just as good as righties

But they are lousey finishers

Truman, JFK, LBJ, Jimmy Carter -- now Obama

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:39 | 1069055 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

Why would Arabs request the western powers to go intercede in a civil war among other Arabs?  At first glance this makes no sense does it?  You wonder why Arabs never seem to get anywhere?  They do not move as one and this will continue as long as the hidden hand is moving in the behind the curtain.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 20:39 | 1069306 Hicham
Hicham's picture

Ah so somehow you're trying to figure out how the Arab league supporting this fits into your "jewish bankers controlling the world scenario"? Good luck with that, although your paranoia will no doubt explain it somehow.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 21:39 | 1069539 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

Its not really paranoia. Now of course someone like you who reads the papers and makes his decisions based upon information that is fed to you, will say otherwise. You may do that if you wish. I shall not.

perhaps you didn't know that the Libyans didn't do Lockerbie? The Mossad did it and then made it look like the Libyans did it. Also the Libyans got set up for false radio traffic to supposed Libyan operatives in Germany concerning a bombing of a disco there that killed American soldiers. A former Mossad case officer now living in Canada, told the whole sordid tale of how the Mossod made it look like communications were coming from Libya and this prompted the idiotic Americans to bomb Gadaffi about it and kill his daughter for no good reason .

On and on and on it goes, yet the foolish sheep never change and they dance to the tune that is played for them because to think otherwise is just too damn painful. So they would believe a lie instead of the truth because their minds cannot handle the truth. This is the way they have been programmed now for a very long time. Everything in this world is connected one way or the other from finance to politics to religion. It all is controlled. Until we as a people wake up from our slumbers and realize who is pulling the strings and put a stop this madness it will always continue.

Rothschild Is Making His Move To Take Control Of France.

BP oil deal with Libya

the only reason why they let that guy go who they tried to frame for that bombing was because his appeal was coming up in a Scottish court and they were very afraid that the real truth may come out in court and so they quickly made a deal to let the patsy go back to libya....... One might also ask, just who it is that runs these Arab countries. Oh they dress like Arabs and pretend to be good Muslims but are they who they seem? One's actions always usually tell a lot about a person and when "Arab leaders" come out against another Arab (which happens a lot over there) then one might postulate that all is not as it seems. As long as Arabs fight among each other, then they are easily controlled.....No? It used to be that Islam did a lot to keep Arabs stupid and easy to control. But this is changing now with the internet and information flow as can be seen. The modern day young Arab on the street is much more well read and more knowledgeable and willing to do things to orchestrate change. This control that has been in place for a very long time, may be dying. However, one must also understand that constant vigilence must be undertaken to make sure that real change does take place and is not simply replacing one controlled and useful idiot with another. I think many of them know this all too well.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 22:01 | 1069612 samsara
samsara's picture

Standing, Clapping. Thanks for taking the time to write that.

Yes,  everything that you said is true,  if one wants to dig and READ.  Before anyone junks HPD, read the articles he posted or do a google on the subjects, names etc, THEN come back with an intelligent reply.

The only thing new in the world is the history you don’t know.         Harry Truman                    A couple to get you started.                                                                                                           
Thu, 03/17/2011 - 22:49 | 1069812 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

You know sometimes  I get real tired. I am 60 years old now. I woke up late in life. I have heard old men talk about how they have been awake since the 50's etc. I cannot imagine having to live all those years knowing what is really going on and yet trying to explain it to the sheep but they did not listen then and they don't listen now. Has anything changed on that front? Not a whole heck of a lot imho. Last year I changed my viewpoints on hope. I finally realized that there will be some who get it and a whole bunch of them that never will. It is a sign of the times. We can see how this was done very easily by a man whose own relative ran the sham trials at Nuremberg. Gee the apple does not fall from the tree does it?

The Century Of The Self - Happiness Machines 1 of 6

They created a whole world of self for the Amerikans and we bought right into it. It was easy. We never saw it coming. And now. Its all about my self and your self and your little world and my little world. You see in Libya, it is like the old days, even till this day. Their country is run along tribal lines. Tribes were at one time important and still are in some areas of the middle east. As the man called Morris said in one of his videos, we long ago lost our culture, it was stolen from us. They shipped in the illegal aliens to fracture the culture and destroy it. Now as Morris is saying and also if you will notice how the leaders of Europe are now saying that multi culturalism is dead etc, even though it was them and people like them and their puppeteers (the hidden hand shall we say) who were responsible for it , nevertheless now, again as Morris is saying these Arabs have done their job now. The Islamic flood into Europe destroyed white western European culture and is no longer of any use, so now those who were once "friends" are now expendable. Gadaffi knows he was set up and he knows what he is up against and it is for this reason and this reason alone that I support him and his efforts because he fights my enemies and the enemies of my white people and my white tribe, if that is possible for any of you to understand, which is probably asking too much at this late stage. For you see, tribe is what it is all about and what it always has been about. Those who operate in the shadows know this full well. This is the way they operate. If you notice anyone who becomes strong among the whites for the right reasons is systematically destroyed or eliminated?  Now as the games begin in Libya, we shall see the same thing repeated that was done to Iraq, to Serbia, and to Afghanistan. But most in this country will never understand it nor see it as it is. Someone asked Ben Franklin one time, what are you giving us Ben and he was quoted as saying , we are trying to give you a republic if you can keep it. I guess we failed on all counts.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 23:39 | 1069960 samsara
samsara's picture

Ya, we went to different schools together.

I'm 1 away from 60.  Came to many of the same conclusions.

Fare Thee Well... HPD

Fri, 03/18/2011 - 04:29 | 1070383 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

you're trying to figure out how the Arab league supporting this


Plain to see: sacrificing one of their own for the welfare of the others.

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:09 | 1068910 tallen
tallen's picture

Wow Oil's just taken off since this NYMEX @ $104.50!

Up 5.3%

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:11 | 1068925 Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

This is all well and good but what I want to know is if Barry O had the Richmond Spiders in his bracket?

Thu, 03/17/2011 - 19:11 | 1068926 gimli
gimli's picture

Ah ...... this vote has paved the way to solve all the world's economic problems.

WWIII will do wonders, just as all the other wars have done in the past. 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!