You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Unsolicited Offer to the Securities & Exchange Commission: Hire Me

Anal_yst's picture




In the wake of the extremely obvious lack of diligence from a Judge hearing an SEC settlement with General Electric, its come to my attention that the SEC is still even worse than my cynical self imagined.  The organization is so completely and pathetically useless that they don't even bother actually doing anything but attempted public lip service.  Seriously, how do you charge a company with accounting fraud without, ya' know, identifying the fraud, who perpetrated it and how, and what's been done to make sure it won't happen again, at the very least?  This isn't rocket science, and yet their ongoing track record suggests we might as well be asking them to explain super string theory when all they really have to do is ask a few freaking questions and put a few puzzle pieces together.

I personally just can't sit idly by and facepalm/laugh/cry anymore.  I am hereby volunteering my services to help my Country and investors World-wide by going to work for the frenemy: the Securities & Exchange Commission. 

I'm offering to work inside the belly of the beast, to sit through hours of what are no-doubt eye-gougingly-boring staff meetings, meetings where inexperience and an incredible lack of natural curiosity are likely nourished.  I promise to tell you, the SEC, when you are about to get your FAIL on, when you are failing to connect two already connected dots, to act as the voice of reason in the absense of, well, any.  I will ask the questions that you either don't know to ask, or just don't ask for whatever other reason(s) unbeknownst to me. 

I may not be Harry Markopolos, but unlike the hacks you (have) currently employ(ed), I understood his 1999 letter in which he clearly explained that Madoff was a fraud.

You can reach me via email,  its (dot) the (dot) anal (dot) yst (at) gmail (dot) com.  The ball is in your court.  Make the right decision, for your fellow country men and investors everywhere. 

 

update: corrected typo in email address




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 09/18/2009 - 03:34 | Link to Comment Thurgy
Thurgy's picture

I'd take the job for zero salary and a percentage of the fraud uncovered.

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 22:52 | Link to Comment RoRoTrader
RoRoTrader's picture

First post at ZH so lets hope I can hit a/the glass with this dive.

Anonymous # 72496 said, "You poor hapless naive little fool. Don't you know what SEC stands for.......Suck Every Cock.....you can find on Wall Street.

I love the direct-to-the point-no-pussy-bullshit creative writing here and LOL when I read this.......also thought it had a ring not unlike the Climb Every Mountain theme song from Sound Of Music.

Maybe some brighter minds than mine can rearrnage some of the lyrics to suit the SEC.

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 19:41 | Link to Comment Cindy_Dies_In_T...
Cindy_Dies_In_The_End's picture

Hey if this works, let me know and I'll write an article asking for a job too :)

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 16:43 | Link to Comment Project Mayhem
Project Mayhem's picture

This article is awesome! So much sarcasm. . . Are you my alter-ego??

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 19:40 | Link to Comment ToNYC
ToNYC's picture

If you altered your ego properly, you wouldn't be asking.

 

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 19:01 | Link to Comment Anal_yst
Anal_yst's picture

quite possibly, for sure!?

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 16:16 | Link to Comment californiagirl
californiagirl's picture

Wonderful! I have been suggesting that some of you go work for the SEC.  I sent off the URL to this page to someone I know in Enforcement at the San Francisco SEC.

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 15:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 13:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 15:48 | Link to Comment Anal_yst
Anal_yst's picture

Its quite clear the SEC is worried they might catch the ire they deserve, thus, by hiring an industry professional (or a few) they could quell some of the criticism heaped upon them and say "hey, we're making moves, see, we hired one of our harshest critics to help us out!"

Please, also, enlighten me as to what is hypocritical here?

While I appreciate the effort, you're really thinking way too much about this, chillax broheim.

thanks

 

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 15:32 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture
  • Probably the same place that the SEC's does.
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 13:29 | Link to Comment mberry8870
mberry8870's picture

In my view most of the regulators are lawyers and have extremely limited skill sets. Lawyers, in general are trained to think in a particular manner. That doesn't mean they have the slightest clue about trading, finance, fraud or how to manage. Read the full 475 pages of the IG report regarding Madoff and the SEC response. It is absolutely appalling. They are much more than incompetent. The only response we get back about the report is that they are sorry and at least they are not corrupt.

I just couldn't go work for the SEC given the people I would have to be around.

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 13:24 | Link to Comment Anal_yst
Anal_yst's picture

The SEC says they pay "seasoned industry professionals" $108,286 to $227,300.  If they hit me around the midpoint I'd take the job, call it a 1-year consulting gig.  Place needs some people who know what to look for, how to go about gettin it done, and aren't just there to kiss a$$ until they can jump ship for the private sector.

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 13:20 | Link to Comment assumptionblindness
assumptionblindness's picture

We have been working for the SEC for over 20-years.  Our team worked on the Martha Stewart case...how can you say that we have accomplished nothing?!  BTW, who is Madoff?

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 13:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 13:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 13:12 | Link to Comment E Thomas St.
E Thomas St.'s picture

I'd do it for my current salary now which is well below 100k a year.

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 13:10 | Link to Comment FreddyInBangkok
FreddyInBangkok's picture

why don't some of you go up there and bang on some doors?

everybody's watching what you won't do. funny eh?

 

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 12:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 10:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 10:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 21:35 | Link to Comment KevinB
KevinB's picture

You will become assimilated. Resistance is futile.

Just ask Jack (off) Ryan...

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 10:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 09:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 09/17/2009 - 09:40 | Link to Comment curbyourrisk
curbyourrisk's picture

Add me to the list of those offering my services......for a fee.

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 09:29 | Link to Comment Sqworl
Sqworl's picture

Good luck, I applied and was turned down, along with several seasoned regulatory ppl.

You must be willing to look the other way.  They will only hire insiders who play the game for the industry.  They target retail ppl. 

The SEC is the school yard warden for the political scumbags in congress!

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 17:15 | Link to Comment ToNYC
ToNYC's picture

Of course. If they wanted honesty, they would have hired Harry Markopolis on the spot for Sheriff and let him be the chief vetting agent, but Nooooooooo!....remember Blutarski went on to become US Senator.

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 21:29 | Link to Comment KevinB
KevinB's picture

And Blutarski got the girl, too!

Thu, 09/17/2009 - 09:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!