- advertisements -
Silver = Bubble
1920 - $1.37
1947 - $0.60
1963 - $1.29
1968 - $2.56
1971 - $1.27
1974 - $6.70
January 21,1980 - $48.00
March 28, 1980 - $11.10
1982 - $4.88
1985 - $6.50
1989 - $6.00
1991 - $4.60
1995 - $6.10
2001 - $4.50
2005 - $7.50
2007 - $12.00
If this is accurate how does one junk this?
It's not uncommon for unpopular opinions to be junked in these here parts. Even if the table is accurate, it might not support the opinion expressed above.
Silver in a bubble is a pretty silly idea, if you ask me, but I don't bother junking SS 'cause my bet is he's more troll than thinker.
so how are these figures supposed to denote a bubble?
A "technical" trader who looks solely at lines based on changes in nominal pricing can apparently divine bubbles with a straightedge and a pen.
Things like supply, demand, market disruption, changes in monetary supply are not ever relevant considerations. It's a question of augury and faith.
faith, I like that. It's the ability to believe something despite the facts isn't it?
definite bubble then, long live silver, and long may it rise...
Accurate down to the penny and dates ....
The junkers are mindless fools ..... They should turnoff mash re-runs and study up on things they invest in.
The 1980 high was a result of Hunt Brothers cornering manipulations. Surely there could be no such manipulation in SLV today !! ;>)
@Spalding, could you please put up a historic dollar chart since 1913 as well, so we can contrast the silver gains please.
edit: I found one, is this accurate to you?http://buyinggoldcoins.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/graph-declinein-do...
Maybe silver's gain has been 'backlogged' or 'manipulated' during the US $ decline, but that would never happen, right?
1913 - $1.00 1920 - $2.02 1925 - $1.77 1930 - $1.69 1935 - $1.38 1940 - $1.41 1945 - $1.82 1950 - $2.43 1955 - $2.71 1960 - $2.99 1965 - $3.18 1970 - $3.92 1975 - $5.43 1980 - $8.32 1985 - $10.87 1990 - $13.20 1995 - $15.39 2000 - $17.39 2001 - $17.89 2002 - $18.17 2003 - $18.59 2004 - $19.08 2005 - $19.73 2006 - $20.18 2007 - $20.94 22008 - $21.57
And as bad and as damning as those figures are, they are lowballed by using the US government's politically-manipulated CPI figures, which understate the true extent of the ongoing depreciation of the US dollar. A more realistic value for the multiple in the rise in prices from 1913 to today would probably be much closer to 30.
Agreed, I was just about to edit in '(roughly)' next to 'Dollar history'. There are many estimates that are even higher that I agree with more, but even the conservative ones are damning.
This is an interesting discussion, boils down to what is the "true inflation" number. The MIT and shadow stat indicatethat the decoupling on the CPI to "real inflation" started to happen in 1983 and has progressively widened since that time.
*edit, erased bone headed math error
To be honest, I feel that John William's ShadowStats somewhat overstate the real rate of "inflation" --- which we really should call by its true name, currency depreciation --- but his rate is obviously closer to reality than the manipulated, and currently surreal, figures put out by the Bureau of Labor Bullshit Statistics.
Love ya akak. I agree with what you say in theory, let me just make a few comments on semantics so others can learn to decipher the MSM and other spin...
Inflation = Increase in the quantity of money...
which leads to what John Williams speaks about = Price Inflation
(or) currency depreciating, but against what?
Dollar might be rising against real estate...
The process of inflation creates currency depreciation versus many assets, unevenly.
What I find 100% accurate is that we are seeing Inflation (NY Fed POMO schedule is about as hard of proof as it gets) in a deflationary environment (scary idea).
1920 1.37 2.02
1947 0.60 1.82
1963 1.29 2.99
1968 2.56 3.18
1971 1.27 3.92
1974 6.70 5.43
1980 48.00 8.32
1985 6.50 10.87
1995 6.10 15.39
2001 4.50 17.89
2005 7.50 19.73
2007 12.00 20.93
*didn't verify accuracy of numbers provided by others in blog
now why go and spoil a good story for the sake of a few facts, and figures...
so 2001 was the best time ot buy silver with greatest devalued dollar vs lowest silver price
Its not entirely clear what was happening with the Hunt's "cornering". What is clear is that there is far more to the story than meets the eye.
The Hunts seem to have began by hedging inflation (wise move in the 70s). Later, they got ahead of themselves and they were crushed by the machine. They became vulnerable by using too much margin, and this is where they lost the plot. Their financier banks knew what they were doing and let them have their way for a while; until they didn't. When the CFTC being only slightly less captured then as they are today hiked margins, the Hunts got cut to pieces and the so-called bubble burst. These are just my observations.
The entire silver complex could be busted today as well, if there are too many large hands unhedged or improperly hedged on margin. But I don't think it would last very long because once the currency is fully debauched, there is nowhere else to go but hard stuff, including silver.
average price of cars
1912 = $240
2012 = $27,000
car prices must be in a bubble and will soon come crashing down to $240 again
Excellent. Great analogy!
KingWorldNews has some outstanding guests this week.
Listen to Rob Arnott: http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2011/4/1_Rob_Arnott.html
(He is a mainstream financial guy – been a guest on all the MSM outlets. Graham & Dodd award winner. Advises some of the biggest funds in the world, PIMCO, etc. He tells it the way it is. Disgusted with what he's seeing. Says what the Fed is doing is BS.)
Then listen to James Turk: http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2011/4/2_James_Turk.html
(Great insight into how the currencies and metals are behaving. After a recent impressive 40% rise, silver is still strongly in backwardation. This has never happened before in history. Turk is watching gold carefully. Says if gold goes into backwardation, which has never happened before, the US Dollar is toast. Means people have completely lost a faith and confidence in the dollar.)
The other KWN interviews are good but these two are superb.
Thanks, that was worthwhile.
well said, rite on right on!
Two problems with the chart, one the prices are not adjusted for inflation, and two the cause of the recent ten year run up secular bull market in gold and silver are not taken into account. Silver is not in a bubble, and the forces driving it's rise are numerous. Just looking at the St Louis Fed chart on M2 is enuf to make you run to a Precious metal dealer. Yours, Maverick
QE Bitches! Where ya been?
Silver is not in a bubble. The dollar is.
But our delivery/shoeshine boy here is totally ignorant of basically every factor driving the economy, so his worldview is just about 100% upside down.
This is why he thinks delivery driving is a growth industry, even with diesel prices breaching never before breached barriers this early in the season.
Nice non-answer, just more personal attacks to distract from said historical facts on silver, just face the facts, pimp ... 90 years worth of silver prices.
In the 14th century silver was valued at $800+,
soon this price target will be broken.
Coincidentally, that was just before the goldsmiths and their bankster buddies started playing with paper money and fractional-reserve Ponzi schemes.
hamburgers = bubble
big mac 1967 = 45 cents
big mac today = $4.00
big mac prices will go crashing down to 45 cents soon
Stop. Doctor says I'm not supposed to laugh like that.
I distinctly remember an old McDonald's commercial from when I was young, probably from the early 70s. It had a stereotypical rich man (mahogany paneling and all) being delivered a hamburger, fries, and soda on a silver tray. Then the butler giving him the change remaining from the $1 he had paid.
Of course, back then, McDonald's food was delivered fast, the stores were clean, and the people were friendly.
And we had to walk to school in the snow. All year long. Uphill. Both ways.
How about supply/demand figures to go along with those highly accurate numbers? Is there any difference through the historical progression, regards supply? Supply/demand issues are driving grains through the roof.(as well inflationary pressure from too many dollars supply) Until the Bernank waved his magic wand tulips were a dime a dozen. Remember their scarcity drove their price until the supply burst that bubble. We know how long new mines take. There is now increasing demand, for an asset in decreasing supply, that is seen increasingly as a store of value, and protector of wealth. Think I'll buy more.
You face the facts pee-boy.. 6,000 years of PM's representing the labor and lives required to pull them from the ground and then valued as a rare and truely stand alone marker of wealth. The dollar is toast, whoever pays yo u to post this crap knows it.
Well what is a bubble? I believe it is when a large percentage of global capital is allocated to one asset class. However, if you do the research less than 1% of available global capital is invested in the PM asset class (PM and PM mining stocks). I don't believe that is a bubble based on my definition of a bubble. If global capital allocations to the PM increase by 1% theoretically the price of PM will double and in my opinion a bubble still would not exist. So the projections of gold at 5k-6k and silver at $200 are realistic if 5% of global capital is allocated to the PM asset class and at that point a bubble still does not exist IMO.
I believe that large institutional investors will begin to increase their asset allocation to PM and other commodities as the prospect for real resource shortages become more apparent i.e. oil, corn, soybeans, wheat, etc. The simple fact is that we have experienced rapid population growth that is pressuring the ability of supply to keep up with demand for goods that sustain humans.
IMO there are two ways to get yours. Print more money and buy them thereby driving up the price as we see happening right now or forcefully take them. The US is doing both because we have the printing press and the military. I don't see this strategy ending any time soon and in fact it will only intensify and create a positive feedback loop in the price of commodities.
Actually I think 4.06 was the low in 2001.
And saying Spalding is total douchebag is very accurate as well.
Get ready for that crow soup ....
Notice that price drop in the 80's, over 60% in a few months .... enjoy.
Notice that 90 year average.
Maybe if you spent some time actually educating yourself on PM's you would be taken seriously around here. Denial is no way to live brother...
You are assuming that Snails wants an honest education, and to participate in a sincere and honest discussion, instead of indulging in what is clearly his real mission here, which is to spread disinformation and outright lies regarding the value of holding precious metals during a time of fiat monetary collapse such as we are in today.
Ah Spalding, we've answered this one last week. You ignored it if I remember correctly.
It appears you have nothing to say except the same thing over and over and over and over and over...
It's boring now...
You seem desperate to get people out of silver. What gives?
It appears you have nothing to say except the same thing over and over and over and over and over...
It's boring now...
Such is the way of dishonest and disingenuous trolls --- it is their Tao. We saw the exact same nonsensical repetition of half-truths and outright lies from the former troll JohnnyBravo/MasterBates regarding gold.
You implicitly assume that they are here to engage in open and sincere discussion, using logic and facts and history to make their case. How naive! Do you not see that they have an agenda to peddle --- or more to the point, that they willingly serve some power with an agenda to peddle?
'You implicitly assume that they are here to engage in open and sincere discussion, using logic and facts and history to make their case'
not so, fact is every dog's allowed one bite, and he just had his.
You have to give someone the chance to fail before you can say that they failed. and Spalding failed.
Now he gets ignored...
Maybe they're junking his opinion and not the data? Duh
worker pay = bubble
avg annual household income 1912 = $750
avg annual household income 2012 = $50,233
Therefore, the average pay of Americans will soon crash to $750 per year and we'll all starve to death. The numbers I posted were accurate, therefore, my conclusions must be accurate.
**Therefore, the average pay of Americans will soon crash to $750 per year and we'll all starve to death. The numbers I posted were accurate, therefore, my conclusions must be accurate.**
Unfortunetly, your conclusions might be accurate...
Bread in 1920 cost 3 cents. That same loaf of bread now costs $1.30. What is your point?
What was bread in 2001 when silver was below $5.00 along its historic trend line.
Also I buy bread for $0.85 ....
you know you can always just sell short silver if you think it's a bubble and want to put your money where your mouth is. I'm 100% confident you'll find a buyer in 15mins.
I thought you were basing your conclusions on 90 years of data. Now you want to shorten it to 10 years of data? The old bait and switch. Try selling some snake oil next time.
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.