Welcome To the Insane Asylum – Making Reality Fresh Daily - Chapter 4

Welcome To the Insane Asylum – Making Reality Fresh Daily Chapter 4
For those who missed chapters 1 thru 3 in this series of 5, may I suggest you click the links below and read from the beginning before moving forward to this chapter? As I said in chapter 1, this isn’t 5 individual articles but rather 1 article broken into 5 chapters for easier consumption. While I did make an effort to ensure some continuity between the sections, it’s minimal and inadequate. Your reading pleasure would be best served if you read the chapters in the order presented. Thank you.
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/welcome-insane-asylum-%E2%80%93-our-collective-psychosis-chapter-2
An Equal and Opposite Force
The power that our conditioning and the Ponzi/government/Fed has over us is essentially an illusion, one that while we may support, is growing weaker by the day. As the Ponzi falls apart, as we fall apart, as the illusion begins to lose its focus and clarity in our minds and thus in our reality, the support structures become increasingly unsteady. Its hold on us rapidly diminishes on an exponential basis.
The more unstable the Ponzi becomes, instability that’s coming from layers upon layers of lies, deceit and deception, the more force must be applied simply to remain in place or slow the decline. The same can be said about ourselves. As we begin to lose our links to reality, as our insanity increases exponentially, the more force of will we must apply to remain functioning. As the systems fail, the collapse progresses rapidly and exponentially. The end comes quickly. Let me explain by using an example from my childhood.
My brother and I were horsing around one day and we starting pushing against each other from opposite sides of a door. Quickly we ramped up to the maximum force we could apply and it became a stalemate, with neither having the power to overcome the other. And we were both rapidly tiring. Since there were no reserves left in either of us, there was no way to quickly escalate and win the battle.
Because we were both at maximum power, even a small drop in effort by either side would quickly be overwhelmed by the other. In this case, I was the first to tire, so I tried to let go and get out of the way at the same time. The door quickly crashed into my face and chest, knocking the wind out of me and bloodying my nose.
The same dynamic is playing out worldwide. Maximum effort is being expended by the Ponzi and its support structures (various governments, banking cabal, Fed etc) in an effort to remain in place. Only in this case, the Ponzi (which is a reflection of our own madness) is fighting against the inevitable collapse of the madness itself. In effect, the Ponzi is being consumed by the escalating effects of the Ponzi, just as we’re being consumed by our own insanity.
The markets are very cognizant of this fact and are eagerly searching for any perceived weakness in the system while at the same time fearful of a total or partial collapse. The participants believe they can somehow not only profit from the destruction but then successfully escape with their gains, just as we believe we aren’t part of the madness and can avoid it’s destructive death throes. Escape with what and to where; by what means and when?
The first sign of any real substantial weakness will start a cascade and bring the system crashing down, which doesn’t necessarily mean governments will fail, though anything goes at this point. But it does appear at the very least that the fiat currency and possibly the economic system’s days are numbered. The real question is when.
To think we can safely escape at the last minute is as delusional as someone waiting until the water is 3 feet deep before trying to escape from the hurricane. The recent flash crash showed us the speed that the stock markets can and will fall. And you can safely assume the government will put a halt to security sales and money distributions and transfers when it gets real bad. Desperate Ponzi men will do desperate things.
A similar battle is occurring between our ego, our conscious mind, outside systemic influences and our subconscious. While the great systemic control forces being applied to the population appear to be overwhelming and controlling, in fact the system is highly unstable and susceptible to a crash if one side gains just a small advantage.
So the logical question is who or what has the ultimate advantage? From where I’m standing, the survivors will be those who retain or regain some semblance of sanity and who’ve already done much of the difficult internal work of finding emotional and spiritual centeredness.
Control through Apathy and Conflict
Let’s return to the citizens at the commissioners meeting. Once they saw that the impossible was in fact possible, that they were able to resist the commissioners, they made this new possibility, this new perception, “real”. And they created this new reality again and again simply by believing it’s possible. Nothing else changed other than their faith and belief in their own ability to effect change for their own benefit.
They made this new perception their own reality primarily because they wanted it to be their reality. So in effect they created their own positive feedback loop to benefit those inside the loop rather than be exploited by others. Either we create our own reality or we live within someone else’s reality.
Since our perception of reality directly affects how we interact with “our” reality, in many ways we make our reality fresh every day. Only we often make it exactly the same way as yesterday because our perception hasn’t changed. The people at the meeting were previously apathetic in response to their perceived powerlessness brought about in part by their fear. But now they created a positive feedback loop beneficial to them (with initial help from my friend) which helped them to subvert their old conditioning.
One could say this is literally the power of positive thinking or belief, which is another way of saying the power of the herd mentality working in and for the best interest of the herd. This local section of the herd is becoming sentient, self aware of its ability to change its reality to something more agreeable and beneficial. The power has always been there. They’re simply harnessing it for the first time.
Apathy is an emotional defense mechanism used to deal with one’s own perceived weakness. “Whatever, who cares, same ole same old, nothing we do matters so go with the flow and take care of yourself.” In a way, this also applies to those of us who are caught up in the endless cycle of fighting among ourselves. We don’t dare challenge our abuser, but we want to release our anger, so we attack each other instead. Our apathy is acted out as aggression against anyone other than those whom we really wish to attack and topple.
Once we enter the devastating cycle of apathy, we become bound within our own gravity well of helplessness. We’re rarely able to break free because the only energy we can muster is used to increase our apathy and the force of the gravity well itself. In order to free ourselves, among other things we must admit we supported the very system that enslaved us, an extremely uncomfortable and emotionally charged proposition.
This is one of the reasons social violence is rarely directed at leadership and often back at ourselves. The submissive slave mentality, the frozen apathetic mind, simply can’t revolt to any significant degree against the master. So the mob acts out it’s aggression on other more vulnerable groups. On a personal level, depression could be considered inwardly directed violence repeatedly applied. We reenact being traumatized again and again, often unable to break the vicious cycle. We do this because unconsciously we’re unable to face the root of our own trauma, our own victimization of ourselves.
To break through this pain means not only that we must accept that we can/could have resisted, but we must also take responsibility for our part in the mess. We won’t push through this pain unless we can see a quantifiable benefit, sometimes just a way out, which requires narrowly tuning our internal radio station to “What’s In It For Me” (WIIFM) at least for the first push out. As nice as it sounds to say we did something for others, at this early stage in the centering, we must be acting solely for ourselves. Nothing focuses the mind quite like the certain knowledge of imminent death or great pain, which removes all the clutter and excuses in one quick swipe.
We begin this emotional and spiritual tuning by looking inward and conducting an honest appraisal of our own part in this dance of self enslavement and servitude. We must clean house internally if we’re to begin the healing process. If we study 12 step recovery programs (alcohol, drugs, sex, abuse etc) we’ll find that this is the heart of an early and long lasting recovery. Very few stay clean and sober long without this internal cleansing. Once the foundation’s been repaired, then the rebuilding can begin. But leave a shaky foundation in place and we’ll have lifelong problems. Or more likely, we’ll simply continue our downward spiral.
By starting small with something easily understood and achieved we build courage, which in turn helps us to push through further pain. We must all build upon our small victories, which develops the experience necessary to go bigger and bigger. How do we move our personal mountain? The answer is devastatingly simple, one wheel barrel at a time. The key is to narrow our gaze and see only the task directly in front of us, focusing just on that one wheel barrel we’ve now loaded with dirt and are pushing away from the mountain.
The control system has convinced us we can’t move mountains. And the control system’s correct. We can’t……in one big push. That’s the illusion that’s promoted by us and others to keep us immobilized; it’s all or nothing. But we don’t need to do it all at once. We can move the mountain one wheel barrel at a time. Anyone can. Once we push through this falsely perceived and promoted high hurdle, and we do this through the application of rigorous honesty, we begin to understand that it’s us who control the chains that bind us to our servitude.
This cleansing and rebuilding starts small, with our own personal affairs and those of our friends, neighbors and community. It’s entirely realistic thinking to believe we can change our conditions by our own hand and for our own benefit. The powers control us only by our consent, usually through active encouragement of our apathy. Remove or reduce our apathy and empower the individual through rigorous honesty (and a push in the right direction) and we’re no longer held captive to the lies, be they internal or external.
Our overall freedom begins within each individual, not in any mass movements, riots or strikes. The only strike we need to call is our own personal strike from self deception and false hope seeking. We’re easily controlled when we self deceive. We in effect blackmail ourselves.
It’s quite simple really. We’re playing a game with ourselves against ourselves. We know what cards we hold but we pretend we don’t know. Consider playing a game of cards between you and your ego. Your ego knows all your psychological triggers. You, the conscious you, will consistently lose, which is precisely what’s happening.
Rethinking the Problem and the Solution
At one time, I thought the only way to “win” was to raise large armies of enraged citizens who would then storm the walls of power and wrestle “it” back. Though I admit I was never quite sure exactly what I would be wrestling back. I believed I needed an army because I’d been conditioned to believe I needed to move the mountain in its entirety and all at once.
And I was conditioned to believe this so that I would never even try; logically assuming I could never accomplish the task. It was only after I realized that we’re always powerful and will forever be powerful and that on a daily basis we’re conditioned to surrender our power that I recognized any massed assault against the perceived walls of power was unnecessary.
The towering walls are merely an illusion we’ve created (with plenty of outside help) in our own minds. If you think about it, twenty years ago the federal government was considered much less ominous. So dealing with the occasional corrupt official wasn’t that difficult. Now, after twenty years of escalating governmental and corporate misdeeds and abuse, it looks nearly impossible to get anything done. Incredibly, we support this illusion in order to kill the pain of our impotence and enslavement.
And we mustn’t forget that the people working for or in government are affected in the same manner. We need to stop, step back and consider why people continue to work for entities that are clearly working against their own best interest. We can’t simplistically assume these government workers, along with the rest of the Ponzi, are just “bad” or dumb or incompetent and walk away with an “understanding” that supports our desire to believe we’re powerless.
I don’t care how much we protest we want things to change. As long as we declare we want change but can’t change, either us or the system, we’re caught up in our own insanity. We need to reexamine the problem with fresh eyes, starting with basic assumptions. Since we’re not aware of many of our lies and self deceptions, we have no idea where they are or how far they’ve infiltrated our thinking. So it’s back to the basics. We question everything, which has the effect of establishing a base for clear and logical thinking.
The more we’re abused, the bigger we make the mountain. We see no way out, in the same way a battered spouse sees no way out of her prison while looking out her open front door. From her point of view, it doesn’t matter if the door is open, there’s no way out. In effect, we’re self medicating using self deception and the comfort derived from ignoring choices. “I can’t do anything about the abuse so I might as well make the best of it.” Since we aren’t happy with our enslavement, but we’ve been (self) conditioned to believe we can’t do anything about it, we must establish mythical but plausible reasons for not acting to save ourselves, thus increasing the spin of our insanity.
This desire to self deceive, created in order to deny the pain any real self awareness of our condition would bring us, leaves us wide open to all sorts of other lies and conditioning. We don’t need to break these illusions down from the outside; we simply need to stop supporting them from the inside. But this can only be done if we reject the self deception and lies that are the basis of both the internal and external control system. This is why I always say “we” are the control system. We are the foundation and building blocks of the very walls we wish to bring down.
An understanding this simple must be, and always will be, dismissed as crazy, unrealistic, unworkable and fantasy by those who have bought into the illusion. To accept any idea contrary to our illusion is the kiss of death to our illusion. Or more accurately, to those of us who have become emotionally and physically dependent upon the illusion, there can be no alternative to the illusion. Our own reality cannot accept any alternatives, for in our mind to do so would be suicide. We’ve built up the problem to such enormous proportions that a simple solution that requires our own actualization rather than blame shifting is totally unacceptable.
This is what I mean when I say we’re co-dependent. The amazing thing is that the illusion dies on its own without our support. No need to storm the walls since we are the walls. And we buy into the illusion by supporting its lies with our own lies. We validate the illusion by making it our own illusion, by making their reality our reality with the power of our own belief.
Wow! Who was That?
If the power of another’s belief is extremely strong, it often overwhelms and controls ours, particularly if we’re uncertain of our own belief or desire. This in a nut shell is the power of the herd when scattered or the mob when concentrated. This is also the power emanating from some individuals that we describe as “presence” or as “charisma”. This can’t be faked or substituted, though that’s precisely what the political and corporate image makers are trying to do.
And we’re susceptible to this image making manipulation because we’re all searching for this very power within, though I contend many of us are just acting like we’re searching. Careful what we wish for, right? The problem with being a success is that we can no longer acceptably fail, meaning the standard has been raised by our own hand, thus we can’t hide any longer by failing to succeed.
Because we constantly find ourselves lacking through (self) conditioning and indoctrination we’re much more willing to accept artificial imitations as genuine (imitations). The same applies to many human created religious movements. We’re seeking religious salvation and divine answers outside of us because we don’t have the desire, courage or faith to find them within.
We empower our religions just as we empower our governments and corporations. The sad irony is that not only do we fail to see within us the power we possess, but by failing to see the obvious we then empower and embody into an external entity all that we wish to find within. We give away what we claim we don’t posses. Which makes sense because then we aren’t responsible for the use (and abuse) of that power. Let someone else do the dirty work and receive the blame while I sit back and reap the rewards. There’s no risk on the hamster wheel.
The very power that we can’t find or see within ourselves is then projected onto and into an external entity. We deny having the very power we transfer to others. Once we’ve been conditioned to fail, success is much more frightening than to “naturally” fail. Failure breads more failure and we actually derive some pleasure from succeeding at our failure, particularly if we’re emotionally rewarded to fail.
Making our Realty, one Pill and one Bill at a Time
Let’s look at a phenomenon that illustrates the power within, which is easily measured by the pharmaceutical industry. Of course, I’m talking about the placebo effect. Someone’s given an inert pill or capsule for an illness or malady and told that the “medicine” in the pill will make them feel better. And for a mathematically significant number of people, they do feel or get better.
How can this be? How can something that’s not a “medicine” act like a medicine? Is that really what’s going on here or is the “reality” offered or invoked by the “medicine” accepted by the patient as “real” and thus the patient adopts the, or conforms to the, new reality.
Interestingly, when these inert pills are shaped and colored like other medications rather than left as a simple round white pill, the effect is even greater. And when neither the patient nor the care giver knows this actual pill is a placebo, the placebo effect becomes stronger. When both the patient and the care giver truly believe the inert pill is a “medicine”, the placebo effect is greater still. What’s going on here?
Part of the effect seems to be tied to the patient’s belief in the fake “medicine” and part is tied to the care givers belief in the fake “medicine”. Symbolically, the taking of a pill for an illness could be considered an acceptance of both the reality of the illness and of the power of the “medicine” to affect the reality of the illness.
And the placebo effect changes for unknown reasons, varying from day to day and person to person. While the dynamic behind the placebo effect is not understood, the effect itself is so well known and so completely trusted to be “authentic” that it’s used to measure the effectiveness of actual “real” medicines. If the “real” drug is no better than the “fake” drug (the placebo) the “real” drug is considered ineffective. But no one dares to look too closely to see what makes the “fake” placebo effective because that might just open a can of worms.
Yes, there have been studies but very few. It’s clear an industry dependent upon selling drugs doesn’t wish to fund it own destruction if they were to prove inert pills could “cure” disease and illness. Nor will a government fund a study that might undermine its illusion of power. Understanding the placebo effect just might empower the individual. Can’t have a bunch of empowered minds asking difficult questions as they wake to their own power, can we? Even the doctors concede that the patient’s will, desire and belief are often the difference between healing and dying.
While there might be numerous explanations for some of what’s going on here, it seems pretty clear that the power of one’s belief, and the combined power of two or more people’s belief, either has the power to alter reality or the power to convince someone to alter their own reality. In the face of this and hundreds of other anomalies, outliers I like to call them, how can we say that reality is static and unchanging and we can’t affect it? At least the scientists hedge themselves when they say the placebo effect doesn’t seem to conform to the “known” laws of nature.
From the Pill to the Bill
The placebo concept blends nicely with our belief in symbolic paper “money” or currency as “real” and of our acceptance of the reality of money when we agree to accept it in return for our “real” labor. We then “spend” the real money for other goods and services, thus perpetuating this reality. Accepting and spending money is our symbolic acceptance of the fiat currency system and of our part in the economic/social/cultural illusion. It really opens the mind when we begin to follow the rabbit down the hole, doesn’t it?
Let’s look closer at this “belief” concept from the currency point of view, one that we’re more familiar with. Just as our currency is only as strong as our faith and belief in our currency, the powers that be are only as strong as our faith and belief in the powers that be. If we believe in our currency, if we believe it’s strong, it will remain strong. As well, if we believe in the powers that be, if we believe they’re strong and powerful, they will remain strong. It doesn’t matter if we hate them as long as we believe they’re strong, or at least stronger than you and I.
Slightly off topic, while I believe Gold is much more than just an element on the periodic table, Gold’s detractors try to demean the power of Gold by saying it’s just a piece of shiny metal, a barbarous relic as they like to say. In fact, it can and has been seen in the past as exactly the same thing as fiat currency, a symbol of the ultimate strength or weakness of our faith and belief in it. The difference is that humans have believed in Gold for thousands and thousands of years.
And this belief is universal, crossing cultural and language barriers. Fiat currencies come and go but Gold has always been seen as “real”, meaning either Gold is more than an illusion or this illusion is extremely persistent. This is the ultimate power of Gold, its universal acceptance as a store of value and its ability to continuously attract and embody our faith and belief in its stability and power.
A few years ago on a hunch I conducted some unscientific experiments with 2 infants just a few months old using Silver and Gold coins as well as Gold plated coins. When I displayed the various coins to the infants, always giving them a choice between two different coins, the two infants most often reached for the real Gold.
This occurred even when I controlled for weight by not letting them hold the coins, controlled for inscriptions by using coins of similar size and engraving and controlled for left/right bias by switching hands. Somehow they even understood the difference between plated and solid Gold. There’s something about Gold that can’t be explained and those that deny this “power” are denying themselves or talking their book.
They Need Us
Ultimately the government’s power is a derivative of our own real and natural power, which is expressed and quantified as our belief in the government’s power. Because governmental and elite power derives from us we can easily withhold our consent and belief in “them” and collapse them in the same way our currency would collapse if we simply withheld our belief in it. There are of course consequences for our actions. But doing this doesn’t mean the entire system would collapse, though the powers that be constantly tell us this would indeed happen if we removed them from power.
This same false promise of collapse is promoted by the abusive male spouse when he tells the battered wife she can’t live without him. Of course she can, just as we can live without our abusers. The abuser (aka the government, Fed and private banking and corporate interests) has conjured up an emotional and intellectual spell (to use an old maligned term) or an imaginary meme, which can also be called an alternative reality. And the battered spouse (we) has agreed to accept, consciously and/or unconsciously, the power of the alternative reality/spell/meme. We are the active ingredients that can break the cycle of violence and abuse quickly, though we often see it as nearly impossible.
The insane spouse abuser (aka government/Fed etc) is entirely captured and controlled by his insanity and rarely stops the cycle of abuse. We often hear an abuser say that he didn’t know what came over him and that he just couldn’t stop. Of course, he often blames the abused for his actions. I suspect he really is a bit surprised and confused by his own behavior, just as many recovering alcoholics and drug addicts admit they also were very confused by their inability to stop. Regardless, the insane abuser is going to continue to abuse anyone he can control just as our government and private corporations will continue to abuse anyone they can continue to control. We are willingly giving our abusers their power by remaining under their control/spell/meme.
I understand that the reader may chaff at my use of the word “willingly”, which is the reason I’ve spent page after page explaining the concept and manifestation of our insanity. Speaking for myself, I know that I will seek refuge in the comfort of self victimization so that I don’t have to do the hard work of self examination. I’ve often found that I set myself up to fail by placing unrealistic barriers in my way or by enabling precisely those I say I wish to break free from.
From where I stand, that’s the definition of willing, though I understand there are mitigating factors. That’s the reason for this long dissertation, to explain the nuances. But if we can’t examine this dynamic honestly and recognize our part in the dance, we’ll never break free from the insanity. What I’m really saying when I use the term “willingly” is that we don’t wish to exercise our innate and natural power to stop the abuse for a variety of reasons. And that’s a bitter pill that our ego doesn’t wish to swallow.
I need to make it absolutely clear here that I’m neither victim bashing nor blame shifting. I was subjected to terrible abuse for many years and I’m intimately aware of this dynamic. It’s abundantly clear that it’s the sole responsibility of the abuser to stop the abuse and that we must demand every single abuser stop their abuse in every single case of abuse. Period! But we must also find the courage to discuss why the abused remains inside the cycle of abuse. We must do this because this same dynamic is at play within our culture and our country.
When we remove our support of the powers that be (abuser) only the powers that be (the abusers) running the machine (this reality) will collapse, just as the people at the top of government always collapse when half the population shows up in the streets. The people in the streets are removing their faith and belief in the current powers and the powers collapse. The exchanges, banks, governmental services and the economic system all remain in place and operational to a greater or lesser extent after the fact.
They need us; we don’t need them. We have bought into their lies regarding their value to us and the system they’ve constructed to enslave us. For now, all we really want is for the structure to remain in place after they’re gone. We need to detonate our own psychic neutron bomb, killing the powers that be, but leaving the system intact. Once they’re gone and our sanity begins to return, then we can begin to change the systems. It doesn’t all need to change tomorrow. That feeling of urgency is false.
When we’re apathetic, we don’t resist or directly support the powers that be, and thus we willingly and consciously relinquish our power to them. We don’t actually hand our power over to them as much as we don’t apply our power against them. They don’t need to resist that which is not brought to bear against them. This has the effect of reducing our collective strength which is equivalent to adding to theirs.
I sometimes think of this concept in military terms. Ultimately an army is only as strong as the amount of force it can muster and bring to bear against an opposing army at any one time and place. A solider not available to fight doesn’t need to be opposed by the enemy. How we prepare ourselves, how we perceive our role, our readiness and our mission directly determines our effectiveness and thus the reality we project or accept. If we’re missing from the battle, the other side doesn’t need to fight as hard or bring as many troops to bear. Ever wonder how 5% of the population controls the other 95%?
It’s not What you have but How you use it
Let’s revisit the commissioners meeting one last time for our final lesson. A year later, the number of people attending the monthly meeting remains at around 30. But of those 30, easily 20 or more are now active participants in the governing process. Their apathy has been replaced with a belief in themselves and each other. And it isn’t always the same 30 people at these meetings.
As new people rotate into the meetings, they learn the lessons publically demonstrated by others in the herd of what an engaged and proactive citizen’s responsibility is. Since more of the citizens at these meetings are proactive, this essentially makes the same force (30 citizens) much more effective. Essentially they’ve leveraged their power while still using the same number of people. The herd is naturally teaching others in the herd through demonstrated public behavior.
While the commissioners see the same number of faces this year as they did last, those faces are now asking questions and demanding answers. And the commissioners are now much more responsive and accommodating. Their arrogance has been replaced with respect and even enjoyment now that they feel they’re working with the citizens rather than in a vacuum. It’s no longer a thankless task.
One commissioner told my friend last month that he now enjoys the meetings even though he still doesn’t like being challenged. The leaders are being retrained and reenergized. The commissioners, after their initial shock and resistance, have conceded to the changed reality and have accepted it, thus conforming to and confirming the new reality. The reality changed because the citizens wanted it to change. The citizens led and the leaders are now following.
It’s our apathy that empowers them. A dam that doesn’t need to withstand very much pressure doesn’t need to be very strong. Pull up pictures of beaver dams if you don’t believe me. And since 95% of us are either fighting each other over the dwindling scraps or sitting on the sidelines in abject apathy, the “towering” walls of the powers that be need only resist 5% of the population. Their walls are only as strong as our apathy is strong.
Energize just 1% more of the population, from 5% to 6% of total population, and we’ve increased the pressure on the powers that be by 20%. Energize 5% more of the population, from 5% to 10%, and we’ve doubled (100%) the pressure on the powers. This is why it’s so important to them to keep us dazed and confused and thus unaware of the power and pressure we can quickly bring to bear against them. As they lose control, they’re rapidly ramping up overt control techniques because they’re fully aware how precarious their situation is.
Remove our apathy and we remove their strength. They feed off our apathy and indifference as well as our infighting, which is why our control system encourages our apathy and division. This is done by way of our own narcissistic self indulgent behavior and by diversion tactics used to divide and set each upon the other. To overcome this, all that’s required is the spark, particularly now that the control system is extremely destabilized.
The kindling and firewood for the spark to ignite is all around us. Or like I said in an earlier article, the snow to create the avalanche is already in place everywhere we look. If we act, we’ll begin the process of teaching the herd how to teach itself. If we continue to disempower ourselves, we cannot empower the others. Thus we, meaning me and you and him and her and them and those, must empower internally before we can disempower the powers that be. This is why we must first find ourselves, then find the others. Once we begin our healing, it will rapidly spread to others.
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/avalanches-and-tipping-points
Fear the Nailman
OK, so now what do we do? Well there are two final concepts I wish to discuss, that of critical mass and the catalyst. But before doing so, we must discuss our own fear. No matter what psychological games I play on myself, that mountain appears to still be in front of me. And I don’t know if I have the courage within myself or others to do the hard work that will enable me to see the illusion.
Or we might say “yes I understand the mountain’s an illusion, just as the walls of the powers that be are an illusion. But I’m frightened and unsure what to do”. Fair enough, so am I. The first step is to talk about our fears. By doing so, by dragging the monster out from under the bed and the boogeyman out of the closet, we go a long way to disarming our fear.
I said way back in chapter one that we’re only as sick as our deepest darkest secrets. Well, we’re also only as immobilized as our deepest darkest fears. So before I begin with the final two concepts, let me relate a personal experience about fear. It’s often easier to create our own reality when we’ve seen others do so. And “fear” is simply a reality we can both empower and disempower at will.
I’d worked in residential construction for nearly 20 years, from when I was 16 to my mid 30’s, encompassing the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. Towards the end of this period, I found myself working for someone else on a crew of one and a quarter building a house. In other words, I was doing 90% of the work and he would show up when I needed a second body to lift walls and place floor joists.
As usual, I was working alone one morning, on top of a step ladder with a compressed air gun nailing down the double top plate of a wall. I was reaching with the gun in my right hand while pushing the wall in place with my knee and left hand. A strong gust of wind pushed me off balance while I was just about to nail the top plate next to my knee. I missed the top plate and shot the 3 ½ inch glued and barbed framing nail into my left leg about six inches above the knee. Can you say Ouch?
From what little I could tell, it was the perfect shot, directly through the center of the leg at a slight angle, through the center of the leg bone and out the other side but not through the skin on the back side. The only thing that prevented it from going through and out of the other side was the head of the nail. I’d just shot myself, nailing the leg muscle to the leg bone, and I was all alone and unable to walk, barely able to get off the ladder. And this was before cell phones.
Then I got lucky. I expected to be working alone all day, but my boss showed up 30 minutes later because he’d forgotten something. He quickly called the ambulance and along with the fire department they got me off the second story and into the emergency room in about an hour and a half, the delay caused by the lack of stairs in the unfinished home. Once the emergency room doctor saw the x-rays, the on-call orthopedic surgeon was summoned.
Unfortunately, for reasons never fully explained to me, the surgeon took over two hours to show up. Personally I think he was off in a motel somewhere. The ER doctor didn’t want to order pain meds because I’d been handed off to the missing surgeon. So I was basically abandoned medically while call after call was placed for the MIA surgeon. I’d been in pain now for over three hours with what was effectively a gunshot wound through the bone. And quite frankly I was getting very worried and was nearing panic when suddenly almost all of the pain disappeared.
This lasted about 2 or 3 minutes and I was baffled. At first I thought something bad had just happened, that maybe I was going back into shock. But I felt OK, not dizzy or cold or disorientated. I was thinking clearly and I was fully aware of my situation and my surroundings. I’d just decided to start hollering for someone to come into the exam room when the pain came blasting back. Oh my, now that was a shock.
For about 5 minutes I was stunned and somewhat befuddled. What had just happened? What the hell was going on? And then a realization and understanding swept over me. It wasn’t the pain that had disappeared and then reappeared; it was my fear. The fear I was experiencing (where the hell is the doctor, what are they going to do about this nail, will I be able to walk, will I be able to work) was creating a emotional positive feedback loop that exaggerated the pain which exaggerated the fear and so on.
Basically my emotional state was more of a problem than the nail, at least as far as the pain was concerned. Since I knew that it was now possible to be fear free, meaning the “reality” of no fear had just been demonstrated to me, I decided to try it on my own, in effect to experiment. I knew I could be without fear because I’d just experienced this reality for a few minutes.
Rather than try to understand why it happened, I wanted to focus on making it happen once again so the pain would go away. So I decided that I had no fear. I’m not talking about hoping or wishing or thinking or praying or trying not to be afraid or trying not to have fear. I decided fear was not present because it did not exist at that moment and time.
This is an example of how something becomes real or a part of our reality simply because we have “proof” it’s real, regardless of how silly or impossible it might seem. I consider this the central core to our madness, this constant need for proof of our reality before we accept our reality. Or let’s reverse that sentence. This is an example of our denial of certain realities if the “reality” can’t be proven to be “real”. Let that concept sink in for a minute.
Consider how much we depend on others, mostly authority figures of every kind, to tell us whether something is real or not. And if we’re told it’s not real, we dismiss it from our minds and thus our reality in the same way I dismissed the fear from my reality. If we’re told something is “real” we believe it pretty much without question. “They attacked us because they hate our freedom; now shut up and get back on the hamster wheel.”
I knew the absence of fear could be “real” because I had just experienced it, in the same way we know our feet will touch the floor when we roll out of bed in the morning. We never even consider that the floor won’t be there when we swing our legs off the bed. We don’t question it because it’s there, it’s real, with such a huge degree of certainty that there’s no doubt whatsoever.
This “reality” has been “proven” to us repeatedly each and every morning. We don’t doubt it because it’s “real”. This isn’t just an intellectual exercise. We approach so much that’s in life in exactly the same manner, thus making real something that might not be real if we hadn’t been told it was real. For example, every source we turn to tells us that the towering walls and powers that be are impossible to bring down. This is not true yet the vast majority of us believe it to be true, thus making it “real”.
It wasn’t even that I knew I had no fear. I simply accepted the condition of the absence of fear as I would the condition of the floor under my feet and the examination table under my butt. I created the reality by expecting it to be there, which is not the same thing as hoping it will be there or expecting the fear to go away. The fear simply wasn’t there because it did not exist. I can create and empower the fear from within or I can choose not to create and empower the fear from within. I have the inner power to make the fear “real” or not.
Do. Or Do Not. There is no Try.
When I related this to a friend a week later, at first he laughed. But then he said it reminded him of that scene from Star Wars where Yoda is training Luke. Luke has just failed to lift the star fighter out of the swamp muck and Yoda scolds him after Luke said he would try again. Yoda says “Do! Or do not! There is no try!” I understand using this movie reference sounds somewhat “out there” but I need to emphasize that there simply was no “try” to be without fear. There just was no fear. It did not exist and it never existed. In fact I had made the absence of fear so “real” that to actually feel fear at that precise moment would have been a contradiction of reality because there was no fear to feel.
I experimented a few minutes turning my fear on and off, of turning the reality of my fear on and off, until I felt I understood how to do it. I was literally going from lots of pain to very little and back again. It was very surreal. The key was to assume total and absolute responsibility for my fear or the absence of my fear. There was no “this situation is making me afraid” or “that nail in my leg is making me frightened” because I make or don’t make whatever reality I want. Nothing makes me do anything. I and I alone control myself and my reality. Only I can “make” me do something. I’m accepted my responsibility for creating my own reality. Nothing else is responsible for making my reality, no matter how uncomfortable it is.
Consider how often we use the word “make” when describing our reality, in particular our emotional reality. You make me mad. I made her angry. She makes me happy. I made my son angry. They made me upset. The actions of the powers that be make me furious. The bankers are making me very upset. Obama makes me furious. In each situation, we’re abandoning our responsibility for our own emotional response. Thus whatever response we present is not our fault. The other person or entity then owns us, which is another way of saying controls us, because we hand over control of our emotional state. This inevitably leads to our physical control.
All there can be is the simple and absolute understanding of the experience of the absence of fear, of being without fear. For example, you’re reading this now. You’re not thinking “I don’t want to be afraid” or “I want this fear to go away” while reading this. You simply aren’t thinking about fear because there’s no fear present. I was creating that condition in my mind. Actually it “felt” like I was turning on and off a switch that was literally located in the back of my head. Something had shown me how to create an alternative reality. And like the good student that I am, I followed instructions.
Suddenly the surgeon walked into the exam room with a bunch of people in tow. After 10 minutes of looking at x-rays and examining my leg, he turns to me in the most matter of fact manner considering the situation and lays out two choices for me. They can rush me off to the operating room, cut my leg open and extract the barbed and cemented nail from the center of my leg bone. This choice could subject me to infection risk as well as a long recovery time because of all the cutting and possible sawing.
“Or we can take care of it with these.” He turns around and in his hands are two very shiny and beautifully crafted vice grips, one large and one slightly smaller. He didn’t need to tell me what he wanted to do because it was obvious. He wanted to grab the head of the nail with the vice grip, lock the jaws closed and twist it out. I was a bit shocked that one choice involved surgery and the other involved a pair of vice grips.
I asked about the danger of pulling the nail out in the exam room and he spent a few minutes talking about ripping open an artery and hemorrhaging, breaking or shattering the bone from the torque applied when twisting the nail out and even tearing the muscle with the barbs. “No big deal” is how he summed it up. I asked him for his recommendation and he flashes this big smile and says “I’m here, you’re here, let’s get the party started.”
After a few seconds of thought I told him to go for it. He asked me if I wanted a shot for the pain and I said no, I had the pain under control. He asked again about the pain, then looked at me and said no more. I did say I’d need a minute to prepare before he started. Five minutes later he said he was ready and I went to that place and flipped that switch I’d just learned about, where there is the absence of fear because there is no fear.
As it turned out, the “extraction” was much more difficult than he expected, what with the barbs and cement. After about a minute of twisting and pulling the nail as one would a corkscrew, he finally was able to pull it completely out. Both he and I (after it was done) were astounded that I was able to bear the procedure without crying out in pain or using the second pair of vice grips on his ear or nose in retaliation. BTW, 25 years later I still have the nail and the x-rays and I regularly pull them out (pun intended) to remember that important lesson.
One week later, when I visited his office for a follow up, I asked him if he’s normally that cavalier and forthright when talking to patients under similar circumstances. He said no, he doesn’t normally and he’d thought about it often, wondering what came over him. He said he didn’t do anything different than he normally would, meaning the same choices would still have been offered.
But when I persisted with my questions, he did say he felt the emotional situation was “light” and “easy going” and he “felt” (I remember he had a confused look on his face when he said this) he should act the same way. He seemed to be genuinely surprised by what he had experienced. This brings to mind the concept of mirroring, how when talking to someone I mirror their actions or they mirror mine, such as if I cross my arms the person will often do so as well.
The surgeon had unconsciously been mirroring my lack of fear and my calm demeanor. He didn’t walk into a crisis situation. I’d created in him an alternative reality simply because he was exposed to my reality. This is part of the dynamic of herd behavior on an individual basis. Understanding the concept of mirroring is important because it can be used as a source of strength and inspiration when we rally those around us or when we seek support from those around us.
Obviously the point of this story is to illustrate to the reader the power of a belief or awareness of a “truth” or “reality”. More to the point, the understanding of the power I already had and still have within myself, which I used to create an alternative reality (in this case the absence of fear) or to alter the reality I was experiencing. What helped me to believe an alternative reality could be possible was simply that I had already experienced it when the fear disappeared for those 5 minutes.
It’s important to understand that regardless of whether or not I had experienced the lack of fear beforehand doesn’t mean I could or could not create the absence of fear now or later. The “proof” had nothing to do with the alternative reality, other than to build conviction in my mind that the alternative reality could be “real”, thus I could make it real. It was the belief that was the active ingredient here, not the proof. The power was and is always there. We simply chose or don’t chose to utilize it.
Our fear is entirely under our control because we make it real or not. No one makes us afraid or fearful, we make ourselves afraid or fearful; the other person simply presents circumstances that we’re conditioned to believe the proper emotional response is fear. Understanding the root of the power of our fear is the key to dealing it, just as one understands that the power of our currency is our emotional response to it.
To quote Albert Einstein “Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one.” The illusion appears to be so “real” that we’re completely seduced by its form and function. We don’t ever consider that something is not real, that something might be an illusion. We use the same words to describe a house or a rock as we do to describe an emotional state of being. Thus it’s “real” simply because of our utter and complete acceptance of it as real.
The power of our minds to create this illusion in all its magnificent detail and depth is so overwhelming that we believe the reality we’re creating is more “real” than that which is actually creating it, our consciousness, our mind, our spiritual being. Sadly, we’re so thoroughly lost in the woods that we use the “proof” of our everyday reality, which is created by us, to disprove the power of our reality’s creator, our own innate and natural power. We are mistaking the finger pointing to the moon as the moon itself.
In Chapter 5 of this examination of our collective insanity, we’ll finish our discussion on fear and then look at how imagination opens our minds and creates our reality. We’ll also examine how reaching critical mass and being the catalyst is the key to creating the changed reality we all want.
Note: If you’d like to explore more on the subject of the dream like nature of reality and how we manifest our reality, then I urge you to spend some time visiting the web site of Paul Levy, who has devoted most of his adult life to exploring this question. Paul Levy has studied Carl Jung for decades and interprets Jung’s writings and philosophy in a very unique way. By way of disclosure, I (Cognitive Dissonance) am not Paul Levy nor do I have a business relationship with Paul Levy, other than to use his private practice services from time to time. Everything on his web site is free including an extensive library of articles.
http://www.awakeninthedream.com/
Cognitive Dissonance - 06/11/2010
-
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend

on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 13:46
#408624
You are rapidly approaching 100 pages. You should've gotten $22.95 for the hardcover version!
I look forward to hitting it tonight.
All the best,
Miss America - Rich Hartmann
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 13:48
#408629
There is a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. Thanks CD !
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 13:58
#408647
"In each situation, we’re abandoning our responsibility for our own emotional response. Thus whatever response we present is not our fault. The other person or entity then owns us, which is another way of saying controls us, because we hand over control of our emotional state. This inevitably leads to our physical control." voila...brilliant sir though i'm curious as how you would define 'physical control'. is it synonymous with what others (Gurdjieff, et al) would call 'energetic control'?
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:30
#408721
I'm at a terrible disadvantage when people in the comment section ask me if my view corresponds to this or that person/thinker/philosopher because I've spent little to no time reading them. This is the first time I've seen the name Gurdjieff.
While I would never claim that I have created an "original" thought, because it's clear other more studied and aware people have thoroughly covered this ground before me, most of my views were/have developed from deep personal reflection and self examination. It's only now that I'm voicing them that I'm beginning to truly appreciate not only the ground that's already been covered by others but how much more is out there that I never even considered.
The other problem I have is with terminology. All my writings are based upon my interpretation of what I've found. It's only now that I'm finding terms that exist that are much more descriptive than my long sentences. One could say I'm writing from the layman's perspective because that would describe me to a tee.
What is the definition of "energetic control" in your view?
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:55
#408763
Nietzsche - fear comes from lack of control and ultimate control is control of oneself hence control of oneself is a journey towards the elimination of fear.
to paraphrase one quote
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 20:30
#409256
"need to control" comes from fear. ultimate control is a fantasy which is the game that ego manifests in order to perpetuate it's control. talk about a self enforcing/deluding loop!
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 03:45
#409489
therefore my mantra has been "fuck it". Given to me years ago by a somewhat enlightened being . I thank him for it. i dont hold onto nothing. Its all a trade off. Prestige, good looks , appearance dont mean a thing. Attitude, awareness and being here and now is everithing.
While married, the wife and i drove truh a town and we had harmony in the cab until she pointed out a well breasted lass and asked had i seen her. It quickly devolved into another tirade and shattered the peace. Mind i dont expect all to be good all the time but i had reached my limit of consternation and pulled the truck over. Getting out i said good bye to her and i would write later to resolve property issues, she could run the business and keep the truck and house. Took a minute to say and walked into the unknown wearing only the clothes on my back, hardly any cash and it did not matter what the future held. Some may say its insane, but i have started over many times and ate at quite a few Sally's. (salvation army).
What is of importance to me is not tommorrow, but now. Living as a man i must deal with the issues of the future, so i have prepared, but mostly so it would not be on my mind constantly. Worry keeps me in my head and i like better to be centered in my heart center.
I prefer relating from experience as so many books lie and we should all arrive at the truth ourselves via experience and experimentation. You got to prove it to yourself. Good night all
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 16:29
#409863
The "cognitive imperitive" - to know thyself
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:55
#408764
"self remembering" is the term Gurdjieff used a lot. It's like mindfullness meditation but concentrating on the whole body not just the breath and "self remembering" but doing it all the time and not just while meditating; or meditating 24/7 if you like.
CD you are well down the road which is a lot more than most and what you have written will resonate with some of your readers. Never worry (what an awful word) that some folk wont understand just remember that when the student is ready the teacher will arrive. Most people think that is just crazy but what a fantastic wake up call when you realise it is so.
Meanwhile in the assylum called Goldman Sachs...
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:21
#408818
just remember that when the student is ready the teacher will arrive.
Marvelously true.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:37
#408872
Lets Hang Parliament
" Be here now".
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 20:32
#409259
Parliament. You mean the P-Funk?
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 22:32
#409362
It's Funkadellic
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:56
#409003
"or meditating 24/7 if you like." krishnamurti was very particular about that as well. what i personally particularly like about these 2 cats over the countless other gurus is that they were making constant attempts to shatter the need for an external personified guru altogether, especially when they achieved 'superguru' status from their disciples.
"if you see a Buddha on the road, kill the bitch."
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 21:23
#409304
beyond "shatter the need for a guru" J Krishnamurti was trying to impart that want and need are the antithesis of detachment. basically he meant ( I think ) that to search for enlightenment is exactly the problem. truth already resides in everything. truth is everything. everything is perfect. to try to " achieve" realization is a losing battle. the key is to get out of one's own way. often the new age game is framed as "self enhancement" when "self dissolvement" would be more effective. but I do agree with the previous threads, just expounding a little.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 06:05
#409533
well said juanG. thanks for distilling the essence even more.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 19:36
#409212
Another great Gurdjieff/Ouspensky book is "A New Model of the Universe" - some of the most amazing concepts I've ever come across. Nothing magical or otherwordly per se, just sort of connecting the dots between the various levels of reality...one example, the law of three and the law of seven...you see the law of seven in musical pitches (scales of seven which repeat) and hues of light (the rainbow divided into seven hues, often called roygbiv - red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet). One of my favorite reads of all time.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 03:48
#409491
Hey Lets hang, been doin that.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:44
#408946
cogdis, didn't mean to catch you off your guard...please excuse the assumption (ass-u-me). and agreed that terminology opens a can of worms of perceptions. not trying to pick an intellectual swordfight here, only seeking clarity in subtlety. will be careful to tread gently...
the link between emotional control & where that leads next is a keystone in the chains that bind methinks. Gurdjieff spoke about that frequently, in case you're interested, here's another to add to the stack : 'in search of the miraculous' (not only for what G taught, but the lessons learned from the POV of the student Ousspensky, and what we learn about the teacher/student dynamic from reading in the 3rd person.) here's a taste:
«A man alone can do nothing. [...] You are in prison. All that you desire, if you are intelligent, is escape. But how to escape? It is necessary to dig a tunnel under the wall, but a man alone can do nothing; let's suppose however that there are ten or twenty men: if they work in turns and cover for each other, they can complete the tunnel and escape».
as to your question, i asked you 1st ;~) curious to hear your views colored only by your experience. will be happy to respond in kind.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 09:53
#409629
"cogdis, didn't mean to catch you off your guard..."
You didn't catch me off guard. But many people assume or think I developed my ideas after reading the greats in this field. I did not, thus I'm mostly ignorant of what they have to say. In the past when I've answered people's questions, I felt at a disadvantage because I wasn't familiar with the material they were referring to. Just wanted to make sure we were both on the same page.
"In each situation, we’re abandoning our responsibility for our own emotional response. Thus whatever response we present is not our fault. The other person or entity then owns us, which is another way of saying controls us, because we hand over control of our emotional state.This inevitably leads to our physical control." voila...brilliant sir though I'm curious as how you would define 'physical control'."
I was not thinking in terms of actual physical control as in physical restraint or force, at least not at first. There is actually no need for that in most cases, again at least at first. When the mind has been captured, the body quickly follows. I was talking about some one's willingness to physically do as others wish once they have been captured mentally. The way is often greased with decison points or forks in the road that allow the person the comfort of thinking they are making a choice when the choice is an illusion. This is America today.
The Nazi's were terribly efficient at this when working towards their desire to exterminate entire races of people. They always gave the people choices, thou the answers were preordained. Do you wish to wear the star of David or do you want to have your assets seized. Do you wish to move to the ghetto or do we put you out on the street. Do you want to get on this cattle car or do you want to be separated from your family. Do you want to shower or wallow in this muddy filth.
Always the choices were reasonable enough for the person to engage in self deception, the softer easier path always evident. It also allowed the Nazi's to use as little as 5 guards for each 200 prisoners. They also used clever herding techniques to narrow physical choices. I learned a lot studying that period of world insanity. And it also wounded my soul in terrible ways. This is where we're headed if we do nothing.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 12:17
#409725
ah yes, the architecture of control...the NYPD are masters at this with their sheep herder lego sets that they seem to have on the ready on a moment's notice whenever the flock gets a little too unruly (and if you observe enough of these, you can feel the moment right when that is about to happen).
always reducing the situation into a binary choice : conform or rebel, conform or rebel, conform or rebel (with always the fear of consequences heavily titled on only one side of the scale).
but when we find ourselves herded into that situation, are those the only 2 choices we have, or is their a 3rd choice, a line of flight with infinite variations only constrained by the limits of the imagination? the video you shared with the guy dancing in the park continues to resonate when musing on this question.
on a tangent, that story about your friend in the local commissioner meeting...do you think that was an act of rebellion he displayed or something different? is standing your ground in front of a tank in tinanamen square without being physically threatening, is that an act of rebellion or is it something even more subtle? even if they appeared to some to be rebellious (as they choose to conform to the prevailing view of how 'rebellion' is defined), weren't those individuals actually conforming to the rules of proper social conduct and simply calling attention that those who possessed the 'power' were not?
in other words, both those individuals could have chosen the destructive path and start shouting out the joint (like we saw last summer in the town halls) or start throwing rocks at the tank, but they didn't. yet those 2 very different paths are both considered under the subset of 'rebellious' along with those more destructive actions (like ramming an airplane into a govt. building for example). the act of questioning the power structure has become synonomous with terrorism in the memespace, but when encountered in reality, does it not have a far far different effect?
if so, the challenge seems to be to find the rightful means to minimize the risk of the consequences in order to encourage as many others to see that there are certain types of "rebellion" that aren't really rebellion and not destructive to the social fabric, but constructive. is the goal at this moment in time to again be revolutionary (bouncing back and forth between the 2 poles but remaining in the cage) or evolutionary (to crawl outside the cage for a moment to see it from the spider's eye view, then return to the cage and act with that spider center)?
(hope i'm clear here, trying to make a concrete practical inquiry, rather than an abstract philosophical one, but finding it rather difficult as usual)
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 05:55
#409525
CD, makes perfect sense to me and thankyou. I've read widely on these matters, but the thing that really comes out is this: accept authority from no-one and no-thing, especially the words of gurus and academics. One must find out for oneself, and seems to me you're doing very well on your own :-)
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:11
#408690
The Most Valuable Thing in the World
Sozan, a Chinese Zen master, was asked by a student: "What is the most valuable thing in the world?"
The master replied: "The head of a dead cat."
"Why is the head of a dead cat the most valuable thing in the world?" inquired the student.
Sozan replied: "Because no one can name its price."
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:45
#408952
ha! +1 hand clapping for gully
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 05:56
#409530
A beggar had been sitting by the side of a road for over thirty years. One day a stranger walked by. "Spare some change?" mumbled the beggar, mechanically holding out his old baseball cap. "I have nothing to give you," said the stranger. Then he asked: "What's that you are sitting on?" "Nothing," replied the beggar. "Just an old box. I have been sitting on it for as long as I can remember." "Ever looked inside?" asked the stranger. "No," said the beggar. "What's the point? There's nothing in there." "Have a look inside," insisted the stranger. The beggar managed to pry open the lid. With astonishment, disbelief, and elation, he saw that the box was filled with gold.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:12
#408693
When I was back there in seminary school
There was a person there
Who put forth the proposition
That you can petition the Lord with prayer
Petition the lord with prayer
Petition the lord with prayer
You cannot petition the lord with prayer!
Can you give me sanctuary
I must find a place to hide
A place for me to hide
Can you find me soft asylum
I can't make it anymore
The Man is at the door
Peppermint, miniskirts, chocolate candy
Champion sax and a girl named Sandy
There's only four ways to get unraveled
One is to sleep and the other is travel, da da
One is a bandit up in the hills
One is to love your neighbor 'till
His wife gets home
Catacombs
Nursery bones
Winter women
Growing stones
Carrying babies
To the river
Streets and shoes
Avenues
Leather riders
Selling news
The monk bought lunch
Ha ha, he bought a little
Yes, he did
Woo!
This is the best part of the trip
This is the trip, the best part
I really like
What'd he say?
Yeah!
Yeah, right!
Pretty good, huh
Huh!
Yeah, I'm proud to be a part of this number
Successful hills are here to stay
Everything must be this way
Gentle streets where people play
Welcome to the Soft Parade
All our lives we sweat and save
Building for a shallow grave
Must be something else we say
Somehow to defend this place
Everything must be this way
Everything must be this way, yeah
The Soft Parade has now begun
Listen to the engines hum
People out to have some fun
A cobra on my left
Leopard on my right, yeah
The deer woman in a silk dress
Girls with beads around their necks
Kiss the hunter of the green vest
Who has wrestled before
With lions in the night
Out of sight!
The lights are getting brighter
The radio is moaning
Calling to the dogs
There are still a few animals
Left out in the yard
But it's getting harder
To describe sailors
To the underfed
Tropic corridor
Tropic treasure
What got us this far
To this mild equator?
We need someone or something new
Something else to get us through, yeah, c'mon
Callin' on the dogs
Callin' on the dogs
Oh, it's gettin' harder
Callin' on the dogs
Callin' in the dogs
Callin' all the dogs
Callin' on the gods
You gotta meet me
Too late, baby
Slay a few animals
At the crossroads
Too late
All in the yard
But it's gettin' harder
By the crossroads
You gotta meet me
Oh, we're goin', we're goin great
At the edge of town
Tropic corridor
Tropic treasure
Havin' a good time
Got to come along
What got us this far
To this mild equator?
Outskirts of the city
You and I
We need someone new
Somethin' new
Somethin' else to get us through
Better bring your gun
Better bring your gun
Tropic corridor
Tropic treasure
We're gonna ride and have some fun
When all else fails
We can whip the horse's eyes
And make them sleep
And cry
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:12
#408694
Damn this is a good series. It makes my angst hurt.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 03:57
#409494
Balance
I am the keeper of the scales
the juggler of my fate
destined to watch my tears
even as i smile
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:24
#408696
You've hit the very essence of our problem CD. Maybe because we all rely on our own experience to makes sense out of this nonsense but this site makes me constantly think about the domestic violence abuse cycle
http://www.mchenrycountyturningpoint.org/images/cycleofviolence4.gif
Twenty years ago, when I started prosecuting this stuff, I joked that this chart could also explain any employment and economic relationship as well. Little did I know I would be living the joke two decades later. We are all living this joke but you're right CD, the joke is not only on us, it is us, it is our perception. Apathy, blame shifting, fear and the illusion of impotence (Geitner excluded) are the building blocks of this collective inaction. You also make an incredibly important point which makes this collective abuse a whole different ball game. This isn't just one abused household and there are a ten thousand Nicoles for every OJ. The minute we all understand this key, is the minute things begin to change. As you know, those who live it, or more important, live through it, are ten times more prepared than any lawyer who argues about it after the fact.
Thanks
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:32
#408731
Do you think of human potential as a quantum power?
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:48
#408756
I think of human consciousness as a quantum power. Or possibly "the" quantum power. So if the human potential is the eventual realization and/or physical expression and manifestation of our consciousness, then yes.
I suspect when the scientists get to the end of the capability of their machines, they will find our/their consciousness gazing back, asking them what took them so long. At that point, the circle/cycle will be complete.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:43
#408885
The Eight Circuits
Note: The names for the circuits used by Dr. Timothy Leary [1] [2] [3] are shown first and the names for the circuits used by Robert Anton Wilson are shown in parentheses [4](they both used the same names for the first, second, and fifth circuits). After the name of the circuit, the name that was used by Dr. Timothy Leary to describe the level of consciousness that is activated by that circuit is shown in parentheses [5].
[edit]1. The Biosurvival Circuit (The Breath of Consciousness)
Imprinted in infancy, concerned with suckling, nourishment, cuddling, bio-security etc. The imprinting of this circuit sets up the basic attitude of trust or suspicion which will last for life. First activated when a human being is born, and programs perception onto an either-or grid, divided into nurturing-helpful and noxious-dangerous (approach/accept vs. flight/flee). Leary thinks that this circuit is stimulated in adults by opioid drugs. This circuit is said to have appeared in the earliest evolution of invertebrate brain. This circuit begins with 1 spatial dimension, forward/back.
[edit]2. The Emotional-Territorial Circuit (Freud's Ego)
Imprinted in the toddling stage, concerned with emotions, domination and submission strategies, territory etc. The first imprint on this circuit identifies the stimuli which will automatically trigger dominant, aggressive behavior or submissive, co-operative behavior. This circuit is activated with abundant quantities of alcohol. This circuit appeared first in territorial vertebrate animals. This circuit introduces a 2nd dimension; up/down.
[edit]3. The Symbolic (Neuro-Semantic-Dexterity) Circuit (The Rational-Empirical Mind)
Imprinted by human artifacts and symbol systems. Concerned with handling the environment, invention, calculation, prediction, building a “map” of the universe etc. It is associated with physical dexterity and Caffeine, speed, cocaine and a high-protein diet activate this circuit. This circuit supposedly appeared first when hominids started differentiating from the rest of the primates.
[edit]4. The Domestic (Socio-Sexual) Circuit (The "Adult" Personality)
Imprinted by the first orgasm-mating experiences and tribal “morals”. Concerned with sexual pleasure, (instead of sexual reproduction) local definitions of “moral” and “immoral”, reproduction, nurture of the young etc. This circuit is basically concerned with operating within social networks and the transmission of culture across time. This circuit is said to have first appeared with the development of tribes.
[edit]5. The Neurosomatic Circuit (Zen-Yoga Mind-Body-Connexion)
Concerned with neurological-somatic feedbacks, feeling high, somatic reprogramming etc. The fifth circuit, according to Leary, is consciousness of the body. There is a marked shift from linear visual space to an all-encompassing aesthetic sensory space. A hedonic turn-on occurs, a rapturous amusement, a detachment from the previously compulsive mechanism of the first four circuits. This circuit is stimulated by ecstatic experiences via physiological effects of marijuana and MDMA, yoga, tantra (Leary's name for tantra was hedonic engineering), Zen meditation and free fall. Leary describes that this circuit first appeared in the upper classes with the development of leisure-class civilizations around 2000 BC.
[edit]6. The Neuroelectric (Metaprogramming) Circuit (Psionic Electronic-Interface Mind)
Concerned with re-imprinting and re-programming all earlier circuits, relativity of “realities” perceived, cybernetic consciousness, so-called PSI/magical powers, etc. The sixth circuit consists of the nervous system becoming aware of itself. Leary says this circuit enables telepathic communication and associates it with peyote, psilocybin, MDA and yage, as well as being associated withcomputer games. This circuit is traced by Leary back to 500 BC and he associates it with the Silk Road.
[edit]7. The Neurogenetic (Morphogenetic) Circuit (Buddha-Monad 'Mind')
Concerned with evolutionary consciousness (past and future), DNA-RNA-brain feedbacks (ancestral, societal and scientific), Jung’s “Collective unconscious” etc. The first to achieve this mutation spoke of “memories of past lives”, “reincarnation”, “immortality” etc. This circuit is stimulated by sacred mushrooms, Raja Yoga etc. The circuit first appeared among the Hindus in the early first millennium and later reappeared among the Sufi sects.
[edit]8. The Psychoatomic (Quantum Non-Local) Circuit (Overmind)
Concerned with quantum consciousness, non-local awareness (information from beyond ordinary space-time awareness which is limited by the speed of light), illumination, out-of-body experiences,astral projection, contact with alien entities (which does not necessarily specifically refer to only materially based creatures from outer space, but rather all beings, including e.g. angels) or with agalactic Overmind etc. Some of the ways this circuit can get activated are the awakening of kundalini, shock, near-death experience etc. This circuit has even been compared to the Buddhistconcept of Indra's net from the Avatamsaka Sutra. Leary associated large doses of LSD (1,000 mcg) and DMT with this circuit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8-Circuit_Model_of_Consciousness
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 00:28
#409394
"The Psychedelic Experience" by Timothy Leary, Ralph Metzner, and Richard Albert. all three Ph.D's at Harvard is probably the best instruction manual on dieing consciously.
To reach primary clear light as seen at the moment of ego-Loss, or what some call illumination is the goal of the text.
One can only hang onto it for seconds, if that, because of the intensity.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 00:59
#409430
Cog man, me thinks you think too much. LOL. The gist of your whole dissertation sounds a lot like what has been called "The Law of Attraction". The nature of the universe consists of only that which is wanted and the lack thereof. Quite simply, "That which is like unto itself is drawn". When you look at something and shout NO at it, what you are really saying is "Come to me, this thing that which I do not want". In this country we have waged many wars. The war on drugs, teen pregnancy, terrorism, etc, etc, and all we get are more drugs, pregnant teens, and terrorists. We have to learn to focus on that which we DO want. Do you know what you want?
I know what I want. I want the brilliance of Jefferson back. I want our Constitution back. I am STRUCK DUMB by the fact that 234 years ago (before there were cars, planes, trains, phones, or even oil) this man had the insight to realize this-
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 01:32
#409445
Evidently money was power back in Jefferson's time as well. In that respect, Jefferson was only stating the obvious. Maybe we are mistaken to think things change all that much in the human domain, although we are in a golden age in terms of science.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 02:14
#409461
>Evidently money was power back in Jefferson's time as well.
No doubt.
>In that respect, Jefferson was only stating the obvious.
Ahh, but at least he had the foresight to know that sooner or later some idiot like Woodrow Wilson would come along and turn that power over to an asshole like JP Morgan.
>Maybe we are mistaken to think things change all that much in the human domain
A great truth. THINGS on this planet are just as they were the day they got here. The only thing that has changed is man's ability to use them.
Cheers!
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 09:29
#409613
"that which is like unto itself is drawn" "come to me, this thing that which I do not want" Often these come in the form of the proverbial cosmic 2 by 4 across the head. Like the story of the guy on the roof during the flood asking for god's assistance. 1st what you need appears gently and easily. Upon rejection, it reappears a little more intense and so on, until finally wham!
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:37
#408740
Hi CD. So that shot in the leg was really a shot in the arm for your spiritual development. My first wake up call was also do to injury.
That was the first time i realized "I" was not the body i was with.
21 years old then . Since we will eventually all leave our bodies we ought to try leaving it before we have no choice. That process will lead to the discovery that 'we are' where our "attention" is.
Thanks for the lenghty offering. Its appreciated .
You are evidently a much more mental person than i am, our flows differ.
This is not an easy subject matter to tackle.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 14:56
#408761
a bit too many conclusions, otherwise it's a reasonable essay.
unrelated
at any rate, all the data I need for my near term future economic expectations (especially on unemployment numbers) was published today (below is from WSJ):
"
U.S. companies are holding more cash in the bank than at any point on record, underscoring persistent worries about financial markets and about the sustainability of the economic recovery.
The Federal Reserve reported Thursday that nonfinancial companies had socked away $1.84 trillion in cash and other liquid assets as of the end of March, up 26% from a year earlier and the largest-ever increase in records going back to 1952. Cash made up about 7% of all company assets, including factories and financial investments, the highest level since 1963."
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:04
#408779
Excellent post.
Individually we need to call their bluff
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 12:22
#409732
yup, collectively individually and individually collectively
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:22
#408827
this is brilliant CD!
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:25
#408838
CD,
Have you ever read either "Illusions", or "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" by Richard Bach?
I just got out of the restroom, where I was re-reading "Illusions" again for the fifth time in a month, when I read your essay.
I am trying to tell myself something, now I just need to believe it.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:00
#408920
No, I have not read Richard Bach. A friend recently made the same suggestion. Alas, my reading table overflows.
"I am trying to tell myself something, now I just need to believe it."
Consider trying this approach. Children's play is actually just practice for a future reality we call life. Who said we must stop practicing once we're adults? Make an imaginary switch in the back of your mind/head. The "off" position is your current reality. The "on" position is the alternative reality of the thing you "need to believe".
Now go ahead and practice entering the alternative reality by flipping the switch "on" and experimenting with believing that which you wish to believe. Then flip the switch "off" and return to your current reality. On and then off, on and then off. It's within your imagination where your reality is created, which I will discuss in Chapter 5.
Give this new reality a place to stretch it's legs by allowing it, and you, to play. Training wheels. It works for me.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:54
#408957
the power of play is severely underrated for sure. when you live in a world where TPTB are acting like spoiled rotten children anyhow, seriously what'd'ya got to lose?
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 17:46
#409073
Ok, CD,
I now know who you really are. You ARE Richard Bach. Between your essay and this post you have pretty much summed up "Illusions".
And the thing that I need learn is that this is all illusion. And its not learn, its remember.
Oh, and "Illusions" and "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" should take you no more than two hours each to read. Each of them are less than 100 pages I believe.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 04:04
#409496
i recall reading Jonathan Livingston seagull years ago with fond memories.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 13:13
#409772
Anybody remember the movie and Neil Diamond's soundtrack to it?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 02:19
#409463
Add "Handbook to Higher Consciousness", by Ken Keyes Jr, ISBN: 0-9600688-8-0 to your list also.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:36
#408867
I come from shaman class in Fiji called "bete" and find your posts fascinating.
Especially the statement "power of one’s belief, and the combined power of two or more people’s belief, either has the power to alter reality" I see examples of this every year in which events that happen don't confirm to conform to the “known” laws of nature. Which bring up the point of what are the laws of nature that are illusions and what is real.
The biggest problem i have found in getting other people to break through their illusions is for them to first understand that they truly don't know themselves 100 percent.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:47
#408900
rats
http://www.shadowdance.com/shadow/theshadow.html
We can continue to do that for a long time. We can leave one relationship and find another, and we can certainly leave a job, or a friendship, or even a sibling who we have decided is causing us pain. We can continue to blame others for our negative experiences, or we can muster up the courage to take a long, hard look at our own Shadow.
The Shadow
The Shadow, is a psychological term introduced by the late Swiss psychiatrist, Dr. Carl G. Jung. It is everything in us that is unconscious, repressed, undeveloped and denied. These are dark rejected aspects of our being as well as light, so there is positive undeveloped potential in the Shadow that we don’t know about because anything that is unconscious, we don’t know about.
The Shadow is an archetype. And what an archetype simply means is that it is typical in consciousness for everyone. Everyone has a Shadow. This is not something that one or two people have. We all have a Shadow and a confrontation with the Shadow is essential for self awareness. We cannot learn about ourselves if we do not learn about our Shadow so therefore we are going to attract it through the mirrors of other people.
Taking Responsibility for Our Lives
The first thing we have to do in order to begin to see our Shadowsides, is to take 100% responsibility for our lives. This is a very difficult thing to do and no one does this overnight so we have to be patient with ourselves.
Being in the human experience, we have all had many painful, difficult experiences where it clearly looks like it is the other persons fault, or bad luck in life or whatever else we want to call it. So taking total responsibility for what appears to come to us is no easy task but it is well worth the effort because when we take responsibility for what happens to us, we can then learn and grow from our experiences and make new choices for ourselves.
Changing our attitude from blame to responsibility will change what happens next in our world. Our destiny is of our own making and what goes on inside of us will be reflected outside of us all the time.
I am very fond of this ancient axiom given to us by the alchemists of long ago: “As above, so below, as within, so without, so that the miracle of the one can be established.” What it is saying is that what is within us, will also be oustide of us. Inner states of consciousness will be reflected in outer situations time and time again. If we are willing to look at the significance of these repeating patterns, we will see the syncronicity of events and situations and ultimately once integrated the miracle of the one is established as we become one with ourselves.
So What Does This Look Like in Real Life?
We have all had experiences with other people that really irritate us. Whenever we feel ourselves over-reacting emotionally to a quality or characteristic in someone else that pushes all of our buttons (and there will be a repulsive element to it), we can be sure that we are seeing a part of our own Shadow.
We will not be able to stand this other person or be around them at all. The reaction is usually extreme distaste as these characteristics or qualities that we despise or hate in others are our own and they are usually operating outside of our awareness. They are in our unconscious and usually they will be the exact opposite of what we believe to be true about ourselves.
Now a person carrying a light part of our Shadow we will be very drawn to, and may even fall in love with, and this is the ‘Gold’ part of our Shadow. So we can also project some of our very positive qualities when we meet someone we truly admire, but most of us have more trouble with the negative experiences as we encounter our Shadow. This is the psyche’s way of bringing itself into the light meaning the light of consciousness.
Projection and Denial
Projection is an unconscious psychological mechanism. We all project onto other people parts of ourselves that we disown, that we deny. We will usually not identify with the projected quality or characteristic at all. It’s them. It’s not us.
We will feel highly uncomfortable when we are around someone that is carrying a part of our Shadow. As I said before, and it bears repeating, there will often be a repulsive element to it. We will be repulsed by that person and whatever they stand for. It will feel like whoever they are is totally against our principles, moral values and ideals and we will be highly critical of their actions or way of being in the world.
So notice. Notice who comes into your life that irritates you or pushes your buttons. It’s usually something that is so unconscious within yourself, that it’s impossible to see that it’s about yourself. If it indeed is a part of your own Shadow, in time you are going to see how it’s going to start repeating in patterns.
Whatever we deem too negative to express, whatever goes against our highest ideals will be conveniently projected out into the world. Our energy is like a magnet and the unconscious is profound. It will draw to itself, itself over and over again. And generally the person receiving the projection is what analysts call ‘a good hook’ for the projection. They will be acting out that quality or characteristic themselves and usually they will be doing it to an extreme so it is easy to see that it is them doing it. But as the 12-steppers say, “if you spot it, you got it.”
Polarizing with Others
Jung believed that whatever we are highly identified with in our character, the opposite extreme will be in our unconscious. He called this the law of opposites. So unconsciously we will attract the parts of us that we actually badly need.
So notice extremes between yourself and other people, where you are polarized — one person is doing one extreme and you’re doing the other extreme. Notice how often this happens. If it happens often enough, then it is definitely something you are totally out of balance with.
Chances are that we are lopsided in our character and we need to learn how to do precisely what they are doing if we want to grow. Not to the extreme that they are doing it, but halfway. This is the answer to many of our relationship problems.
Doing Shadow work requires that both partners have to be willing to come to the middle of the polarization. It requires honest and authentic communication. Two people who trust each other enough to be vulnerable, and have a commitment to their relationship, can help each other see each others Shadow and bring about in each other a more cohesive state of integrity with the Self.
There are no accidents. Both people are attracted or repelled whatever the case may be by an unconscious collusion. There is an order in the Universe whether we can see it or not. According to Jung, the psyche is always striving for wholeness and if we can take our cues from nature we will see that wholeness is balance. As Marian Woodman, a Jungian analyst, so aptly put it: we have day time and night time. Which one of us would want no night time?
A Blind Spot
We all have ‘blind spots’ in our character as Dr. Liz Greene, PH.d., author of Relating: Living With Others on a Small Planet, points out. She says these inherent “blind spots” in the psyche that we know absolutely nothing about are precisely what creates havoc in our relationships.
It can be really interesting when a friend points out to us something about our character, and we will say to them, “I’m not like that.” We will resent them. We will be angry with them and we won’t want to have anything to do with them anymore because we will feel misunderstood.
So whenever you catch yourself saying “I’m not like that,” if it gave you an emotional charge when they said it, — you probably are like that, you just don’t know it. A really good way to bring your Shadow qualities into awareness is to ask a couple of really close friends to describe you on paper. They see our Shadowside way before we do. Our real friends love all of us, the light and the dark, and accept our humanity the way we accept theirs. And isn’t acceptance what we are all looking for?
Too Good to be True
We’ve all met people who seem too sticky and gooey. They are “too nice” and sickeningly sweet. We sense that they are somehow being fake when we are around them and we feel we never really know them. They are, as the saying goes, “too good to be true.” These people are barricaded behind their mask or persona. They will deliberately avoid any kind of negative reaction or emotion. They refuse to be real and suffer the acceptance of their own dark side and this can be a dangerous thing. We are better off knowing about our dark side because as Jung put it “Whatever one does not live, lives against one.”
Slips of the Tongue
How many times have you said something and then said, “I didn’t mean it that way.” Well we did mean it that way and our Shadow decided to have it’s say. The Shadow side of us relates to life much more authentically and it will come out whether we like it or not.
Repressing or denying our Shadow can lead us into experiences where we are overwhelmed by it and it can take us over. Then we can end up with egg on our face, acting in the very way we have denied or condemned in others and saying to ourselves, “Why did I act like that? I am not like that.” Well when we say it like that — “I’m not like that,” — we are like that, we just don’t know it.
There are many hidden and undeveloped parts in all of us and in attempting to keep our self-image intact, we will completely deny their existence. We do this because we want to be accepted by our society, by our families and our peers. Our baser qualities — our hypocritical behavior, our excessive greed, our ruthlessness, our ability to be manipulative — go straight into the unconscious. But that doesn’t mean they are not active in our life, they just live in the unconscious (unsupervised), and periodically they burst forth into our awareness and propel us into situations that we would much rather avoid.
Choices Versus Denial
So the more we know about ourselves, the more choices we have. We can then choose not to behave in a certain way. When we don’t know about something, then it will take on a compulsive, automous element to it.
These are the embarrassing moments that all of us in the metaphysical or Christian movement can attest to when we say or do something which is the opposite of what we intended to do or say. We embarrass ourselves and can feel really bad about ourselves because we are not living up to our ideals. Ideals are important and certainly have their place in our world, but not at our expense. Not when it’s not the truth about how we really feel or who we really are.
So learning about our Shadows can bring us the real peace Jesus talks about when he says “You will know the truth and the truth will set you free.”
Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is
embodied in the individual’s conscious life,
the blacker and denser it is.
At all counts, it forms an unconscious snag,
thwarting our most well-meant intentions.
— Dr. Carl G. Jung
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:08
#408936
Gully
Thanks it will take me a few more reads to really understand what you posted but i already picked up examples about my shadow.
As an example i am really easy going person that gets on with everyone but during the last week i said some disparaging comments about a person that i would never normally say. If i look at the person he is very similar to myself in so many different ways which is unique in Fiji.
Amazing how much i am learning/confirming from zero hedge
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 17:00
#409016
rats
I found that recently. It helped understand quite a bit more of myself. The only work is the self work.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 01:14
#409437
Rats,
"You know your self actualized when your free of the good opinion of others."
-AM
:o
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 04:08
#409499
oh yes. G-R-U-N-T- made pfc ist class 3 times.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 10:03
#409636
Stange comment...Perhaps that's why your merehuman.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 10:44
#409660
i was a rebellious soldier. We referred to each other as "grunts" . Pfc Is a low ranking i managed to arrive at and be busted down from in the army.
Hope that clears it up for you.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 12:38
#409741
Just wanted some clarity. Thank you.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:45
#408893
'Ever wonder how 5% of the population controls the other 95%?'
Great piece CD, triggers many, many thoughts and such. One that came to mind when I read this was by Walt Kelly, "We have met the enemy and he is us."
Keep prodding and who knows.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:55
#408909
Primary Reality - What Is.
Secondary Reality - What we perceive of What Is.
Tertiary Reality - Problems created for us by the difference beween our Primary and Secondary Realities.
We don't respond to what is real. We respond to what we perceive. Change our perceptions and we will change our response. Sometimes our perceptions are almost identical to what is real. Sometimes our perceptions are far afield of what is real. The truth remains - we respond only to what we perceive. It's kind of a tautology: how can we repond if we haven't perceived something?
A test was performed on a prisoner condemned to death. He was laid down on an examining table. A bucket was placed beneath the table. The prisoner was told that he was going to be bled to death. The noise he would hear would be his blood draining into the bucket underneath his table. When the noise stopped, that would mean all his blood was drained out. The "executioners" made some superficial cuts to the prisoner and then began draining an appropriately-sized bag of water into the bucket. When the sound of the draining fluid stopped, the prisoner died - even though he had not actually bled at all. (Reported in Time Magazine some years back. I have the article buried somewhere in my filing cabinet.)
The prisoner was subjected to a Tertiary reality created by a Secondary Reality that had nothing to do with Primary Reality. We - our thoughts and our nervous system - respond to what we perceive, not to what is - even as the prisoner responded to what he perceived, not to what actually was. We were built to do that.
CD, re. your accident - I'm certain that being close to help helped you master your fear. You did not do it by yourself as it appears that you are claiming. If no rescue had come to you, and you had lain at the accident site for hours, and you had seen your blood draining away, you response would have been different. Panic would have perhaps been part of your emotional response. Or maybe not? You can't know unless you've lived through the situation - and you didn't live through it. You were rescued. Once you were rescued, your perceptions of what was about to happen to you changed. And you didn't cause your rescue, therefore you cannot say that you alone were responsible for the change in your perceptions about what was going to happen to you.
No man is an island. We all affect each other. To say otherwise, to say that each man is alone responsible for his own emotional responses, is irresponsible. The best we can do is exert some influence over who we associate with, which in turn influences what triggers we expose ourselves to.
I'm not criticizing your articles; just your assertion that you alone were responsible for conquering your fear. If I've misinterpreted what you said, then nevermind.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 01:39
#409448
The premise seems to be that since the prisoner was condemned to death, we might as well not let a good catastrophe go to waste. Hence, torture the prisoner to death.
Love the word "test". No doubt the executioners were wearing white lab coats.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 02:32
#409468
FEAR:
False
Expectations
Appearing
Real!
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 04:22
#409504
I was stabbed in LA calif my first day there after coming out of the army.
the knife aimed for my heart but i diverted it by getting it stuck in my arm. Since i was at the top of the flight of stairs i had no choice but to retreat downwards during which time i felt fear as my assailant kept on trying to stick me all the while. I ran like hell and evidently was faster. As i ran i surveyed the mess my arm had become. The knife had cut all truh it, so there was a rip and hole, blood gushing from it. Somehow , even as i ran i removed the shirt i was wearing and used it to wrap my arm and hold the meat together. Perhaps i was in shock, still i did all the right things for me to survive and despite the fear while being chased and punctured, there was no more fear as i had to be practical and felt a disassociation from my body in that moment of do or die.
hell i had to call the ambulance myself.The gas station attendant was afraid to get involved and refused to call for me.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 06:53
#409538
merehuman
I had major surgery. I was cut from the middle of my back to my armpit. I had a large lump of flesh removed.
When I woke up in the recovery room I was shocky. The next time as long as I could eat something and walk they allowed me to go home. Within two days I was walking the dog, and by the fourth I gave up the pain pills.
My third major operation was about four months later. The doctors were amazed I could walk the halls immediately after surgery.
Some of us just deal with pain differently.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 11:12
#409675
True.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 07:09
#409543
Had a similar experience with a sharp blade.
In mine, I "thought" I was having a fist fight one night in a parking lot and doing quite well actually...LOL...with the guy swinging wildly and me connecting just about everytime.
Until I felt something warm on my chest and shoulder...it was blood.
Turns out the guy I was fighting had a small scalpel like blade in his hand and was not "missing" at all, for every jarring blow I landed on his head and face he was slicing my arms, face and neck. Once I realized this I rolled across the hood of a parked car to get some separation and reached for my neck, sure enough my hand found a six inch slice which I stuck my middle finger in and ran to where I knew I had some friends who took me to the hospital.
What I learned from this experience was to never underestimate the exertion's of another because my "perception" of their reality may not be "the" reality at all. I also noticed I was calm, the rage didn't kick in till later on the basis of somehow he cheated in a street fight ;-)
Regards.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 09:33
#409615
funny how the ego flees in moments like this. slow motion car wrecks etc. that is being present. cowardly bastard, the ego.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 17:12
#409887
The fight or flight phenomenom is well known...self preservation is innate in all sentient beings...history is replete with examples of "bad" ego actually leading to murder & suicide based on love, money, or just a belief system being shown as hollow.
So it's unclear to me if "ego" is a negative or positive...I've known people with massive ego's who have done wonderful & constructive things and I've also known people who had no discernable "ego" do likewise.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 15:59
#408915
In the end there are two reasons why it just doesn't matter.
1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avalokite?vara
According to Mahayana doctrine, Avalokite?vara is the bodhisattva who has made a great vow to listen to the prayers of allsentient beings in times of difficulty, and to postpone his own Buddhahood until he had assisted every being on Earth in achieving nirvana.
2.
http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html
Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?
ABSTRACT. This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. It follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. A number of other consequences of this result are also discussed.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 02:34
#409469
Ah, but WHAT is the Computer?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 12:28
#409735
think the plant world would disagree with that abstract actually.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:05
#408925
Nothing against Paul Levy, or Carl Jung... BUT
If you’d like to explore more on the subject of the dream like nature of reality and how we manifest our reality, then I urge you to spend some time with Buddhist philosiphy and spirtual mechanics. Buddhism is sometimes referred to as a religion, and some people treat it that way, but Buddhism is in truth nothing less than a spirtual science that fearlessly approaches reality as it is.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:22
#408951
Reality as perceived by whom? Or are you stating that there are as many realities as there are perceivers? I claim that, at any given moment, the cat in the box is either dead or not dead, regardless of the abilities of the perceivers to figure out which state is correct. In this situation, there are only two possible realities. There are not as many realities as there are perceivers. This is the case with many other realities as well. See my comments about reality a few posts above here.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:58
#409014
RichardP
"Or are you stating that there are as many realities as there are perceivers?"
The universe is a single perceiver fractured off into various aspects. Each aspect is still " ME". We don't know it and we have no way of communicating with "our self". We can't not enter into our other selves to see that we are one.
That is the greatest sadness of this existence. We are all lonely seeking kinship seeking understanding but failing to touch our other self.
And ourselves are composed of this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe
The one-electron universe hypothesis, commonly associated with Richard Feynman when he mentioned it in his Nobel lecture,[1] postulates that there exists only a single electron in the universe, propagating through space and time in such a way as to appear in many places simultaneously.
Lao Tzu got it right in the Tao Te Ching
As for the Way, the Way that can be spoken of is not the constant Way;
As for names, the name that can be named is not the constant name.
The nameless is the beginning of the ten thousands things;
The named is the mother of the ten thousand things.
Therefore, those constantly without desires, by this means will perceive its subtlety.
Those constantly with desires by this means will see only that which they yearn for and seek.
These two together emerge;
They have different names yet they’re called the same;
That which is even more profound than the profound —
The gateway of all subtleties.
Translated by Robert Henricks (1989)
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 01:51
#409453
God, that's weird, I've been propagating that idea of one electron myself without ever hearing that Richard Feynman had the idea. Does that make me a genius? Clearly not, for I undoubtedly had the idea for the wrong reason! My reason was that all electrons are identical and therefore form an equivalence class. It's like saying 1/2, 2/4,-3/-6, and all other such fractions are just 1/2. So that's how I came to the idea. In effect, we live in a quotient space. Anyway, you've got me curious to find out what Feynman had in mind. Thanks!
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 21:46
#409325
RichardP no doubt your intentions are honorable. But, as I once had to convince myself, why don't you try out the methodology of something along the lines of meditation and see what the brew haha is about? if there is nothing substantial there, then stick to your logic. but ya never know until you try.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 04:36
#409502
juangrande - I'm not certain what you are getting at with your comment. I asked a pragmatic question in the post to which you are responding. I did not/do not understand what Crab Cake actually means by "fearlessly approaches reality as it is". Every day we all approach reality as it is, or at least we stumble through reality as it is. But that has nothing to do with how accurately we perceive reality. To rephrase my question to Crab Cake - is Buddhism, as a spiritual science, going to help the color-blind person perceive the color green? Is it going to help plug the leaking well in the gulf so that we don't need to do scientific and mathematical calculations? Is it going to do more to help you pass the Bar exam than actually studying the required law texts would help?
I get the "don't want anything and then you won't be disappointed" approach to bonding with the universe. What I don't get is what Crab Cake meant. Is Buddhism, as a spiritual science, going to help the color-blind person perceive the color green? Or is it only going to help the color-blind person fearlessly approach the color green, even though he can't perceive the reality? What is the value of fearlessly approaching reality when you end up misperceiving what that reality is?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 04:27
#409507
Aleister Crowley, england , said to be into black arts, long ago dead
"as ye thinket so it be" . not the exact words, but close enuf
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 06:48
#409537
merehuman
Crowley also said " Love is the law, love under will" and " Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law".
Ever see the thing about how Crowley may be Babs Bush's father?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 10:57
#409668
Gully, thanks for stating it correctly. And , no i had not heard of it.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 12:35
#409740
some of my favorite tinfoil:
http://www.informationliberation.com/index.php?id=16683
be sure to read the comment on 5/26/09
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:46
#408988
Crab Cake
Buddhism is codified Psychology. Follow the rules and you can do no wrong.
The Four Noble Truths
1. Life means suffering.
2. The origin of suffering is attachment.
3. The cessation of suffering is attainable.
4. The path to the cessation of suffering.
Eightfold path
1. Right View
2. Right Intention
3. Right Speech
4. Right Action
5. Right Livelihood
6. Right Effort
7. Right Mindfulness
8. Right Concentration
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 17:35
#409063
Buddhism is our best hope to save the future of humanity.
Christianity, Islam, Judaism just ain't gonna do it.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 21:49
#409329
all of the above faiths have a strong mystic history to them. they all say basically the same thing. it's just the degree of "interpretation" has warped the message.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 04:26
#409506
So you think that Christianity says that people can make themselves perfect through their own efforts? Just follow the list presented by Gully Foyle and one can be perfect?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 09:43
#409623
RichardP who is to say you are not already perfect. It's the making into something else that is egoic realm. these other achievements of which you speak( in other threads) can all be realized without the ego running the boat, in fact probably easier. as far as the earlier thread about what I mean?- I mean do the work and see where it leads. Until then you are only speculating.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 13:57
#409784
I wasn't commenting on whether we might already be perfect or that we might not be perfectable. I was commenting on your claim that "... all of the above faiths ... say basically the same thing. No they don't. What Christianity says stands in stark contrast to what the other faiths say on the issue of human perfectability and how it is attained.
I would never seriously engage in a conversation about the perfectability of humans. My interest is in the fact that a newborn cannot write what CD is writing. (CD couldn't write this as a newborn either.) My interest is in the process by which a newborn acquires knowledge, skills, and abilities (ksa's) and how he is educated to the powers of his own mind. Acquiring knowledge, skills, and abilities enables one to become a useful member of society and to operate autonomously within society. The concept of "perfect" serves no purpose in this context. A newborn may be "perfect as he is", but he is of little use to society. And other newborns are of no use to our target newborn, perfect as they may be. They cannot bring the newborn what he needs to survive (food, shelter, comfort). Only those newborns who have matured through the acquisition of ksa's will be of any use to our target newborn. Only the matured newborns will be able to help our target newborn survive. A "perfect as he is" newborn cannot do that. And an uneducated, "perfect as he is" adult probably couldn't either.
I do understand the many ways the ego can get in the way of a person being educated to the powers of his own mind and becoming a useful member of society in the process. But that is a different discussion than talking about individual perfectability.
Only a person who has their ego under control can live their life according to this quote attributed to Ronald Reagan: "There is no limit to what one can accomplish if one doesn't care who gets the credit."
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 16:14
#409854
If a new born is of little use to society why then are we adults often so enamored with them? I am not disagreeing with you about the importance of the "egoic" aspect of our mind in everyday life. It truly is a valuable tool. however, there is another mode of perception available that the ego does not wish you to activate. ego has basically taken over the ship and cunningly maintains control with deception. I,m saying try something different and see what happens. I, too, was a sceptic but to what avail?
a long time ago, I smoked some pot for the 1st time with a friend of mine. as we finished, he looked at me with the blood red eyes of a demon and inquired, " well how is it?" I replied that I felt nothing out of the ordinary. He was incredulous (apparently this was good shit). However in my dogged pursuit of alternative reality I persisted experimenting and finally, after 5 or 6 times I felt it. I experienced "stoned". without comparing relative merits of stoned and enlightened, do you get my drift? just do it.
as for the christianity part I refer you to the Science of Enlightenment by Shinzen Young. He speaks extensively to my point of "essentially the same", or more accurately, started out as essentially the same message. I'm sure this is the basis of my opinion. I agree that the form in which the various religion's are expressed today are hardly similar. but there are orthodox outliers in christianity, judaism, and muslim that essentially practice meditative contemplation similar to what we think of as buddhist practice.
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 12:24
#410618
I did not speak to the issue of whether or not Christianity and other religions were essentially the same. I made a very narrow point of distinction. Christianity does not say the same thing that other religions do about the ability of humans to perfect themselves.
And I did not say infants were of no use to society. I said other infants could not keep our target infant alive - even though infants "just are". Folks need to acquire ksa's before they can help others live. Acquiring ksa's requires a sound mind and opportunities for learning. Not all have either one or both. Not all have the ability to perceive what CD is presenting in this series. Should we then criticize them for this failing?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 01:26
#409442
JR,
A bit shallow, don't you think?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 08:03
#409564
Not much on pacifism either...but it's fine for domesticated animals to be led quietly to the slaughter house as it cut's down on costs associated with production ;-)
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 01:59
#409456
Epic fail. Each of these religions can complement the others. I, for instance, had a prejudice against Islam for a long time, but so much depends on the people who practice the religion. There is a wonderful film called "The Voyage" about a young man who makes a pilgramage to Mecca with his father. The son drags his heels literally and morally the whole time before having an epiphany when his father turns up dead in Mecca. As an allegory, it compares to the prodigal son story in Christianity. All these religions can instill a sense of mystery and transcendance and there are good and pious representatives of each. Religions are not different brands of toothpaste or menu choices in a restaurant.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 11:11
#409674
Eckankar, ancient science of soul travel was my path since 73'. Had to give it up since i found out Paul Twitchell stole, copied someone elses work.
But i got a lot of self understanding from "Dialogues with the Master".
Having now tossed all religions, i am forced to rely on selfobservation and draw my own conclusion. I like it
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 21:47
#409327
Gully,Gully,Gully, you da bomb!
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 22:08
#409345
juangrande
Ever read any Paul Brunton? I have three of his notebooks, very interesting.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 22:17
#409350
gully, these days I'm more into reading the tea leaves of my inner subtleness. but I,ve no doubt he da bomb too. but how amazing to find this topic of discussion, here of all places. proof that all the hardwork of those not afraid to challenge the "story" is paying off. thanks to you CD and all who have taken the time to absorb the message!
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 10:11
#409638
Hmmm, you don't see Paul Brunton's name brought up very often.
Gully, are you familiar with Richard Rose? (West Virginia guru, almost sounds like an oxymoron, eh?)
Interesting thread. I have often wondered of my fascination with ZH, I have very little interest in materialism, yet I am drawn to this site as if a moth to flame. The Observer in my mind watches this great unraveling with no emotion, yet my physical body is just a wee bit scared.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 16:19
#409857
I've got a buddy who loves richard rose. my buddy actually reminds me of RichardP. RP maybe you should check him out. richard rose that is.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 14:18
#409804
Being peace. It may not be religion but Amen 2 u
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 16:49
#408989
This might seem off topic but maybe not so much: I have often wondered why pain hurts so much. I know that sounds silly but it's a serious question.
The obvious answer is we, and other creatures, evolved this highly unpleasant mental response to bodily injury that we perceive as pain as a warning that the body is damaged and under threat. It must speak to the brain with urgency that requires us to attend to the cause, for example by removing one's hand from a hot stove. In this way, pain is a survival mechanism. But why must this message be experienced as pain in the way that we know it? Couldn't some other kind of persistent mental signal serve the same purpose? In your case your flesh and bone were telling your conciousness that a serious problem needed to be dealt with. But there was actually no pain in your leg, only in your mind. There is a point where you want to say OK I got the damn message! But the pain persists, even increases, to no further purpose. At some point extreme pain can actually work against survival if the distraction compromises our capacity for fight or flight
Which leads to another question -- do other creatures, like us but lacking self-awareness, experience pain in the same way? Obvously they do experience it, very strongly in proportion to the injury; this can be observed in their behavior. But do we humans add another dimension to pain through our concious awareness that our own precious and unique self is being subjected this pain, this insult? If so, then the experience you describe could be a process of de-intellectualizing pain, observing its animal reality, but neutralizing the intellectual dimension by not taking personal offense.
Just a few random thoughts, some of which have been kicking around in my mind for a long time.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 17:35
#409062
Completely annectodal, but telling nonetheless. When I was a child, I lived in a rural area. We allowed our cats to roam freely, and they always came home. One day, we found one of our female cats wailing at the front door. From her vocalizations, we could tell she was clearly in considerable pain. We brought her to to vet, and it turned out that her pelvis was completely broken. The vet postulated that she was either run over by a car or by farm machinery in the corn fields. She was completely baffled as to how the cat made it back to our house. Thing is, she did. And once she made it to the front door, she never walked or rose on her legs again until we had to put her down. The mind is an extraordinary weapon.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 02:40
#409470
A beautiful anecdote, Marla and Me. I had a cat who was taken by my spouse during the divorce. The cat kept coming back to me about six times, which involved crossing dangerous four lane roads and finding her way across town. I was dumbfounded! She had to have been run over when she made her seventh attempt. Animals are capable of great love and have a wisdom we know not of. To mistreat an animal is the depths of ignorance.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 17:53
#409086
seventree,
Another anecdote, in my practice as a movement educator, human pain is exceedingly subjective. Most pain does exist in the "mind", despite the experience of pain at certain points in the body. In many cases, where the pain "is", the problem "ain't". This is in regards to referral symptoms based in the nervous system. And sometimes, the pain is a residual effect and no longer really exists except in the mind.
I often ask clients to "define their pain" versus simply succumb to it. They often cannot do this. Many times, their fear of pain keeps them immobile, even past the previous injuries. A good resource on trauma and pain can be found in Dr. Robert Scaer's work with whiplash victim.
Personally, and from only my limited viewpoint, we have the capacity to keep judgment away from the pain. If we think it's going to hurt, it likely will. If we're afraid it will, same goes. I often suggest to others who ask to go fully into their pain and see what they experience. Simply observe. Animals move regardless of their condition if they can; their intentions remain in spite of their injuries. I want to say they simply don't give pain the power we do, but I cannot know their minds.
Just my 2p...
on Mon, 06/14/2010 - 01:35
#411988
Azrael09, I know exactly of what you speak in regards to defining pain. As a child (9 or 10 years old) I was able to actually undergo various types of pain and completely immerse myself in the sensation, and then understand that what I thought was "pain" didn't even really hurt if I thought about it and took time to deconstruct the sensations and experience them in small pieces. Since then, everything hurts a lot less than it used to, if at all.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 21:55
#409335
As Shinzen Young explained for me, pain is pain. pain with resistance to the pain is suffering. learn to "stay" with pain without judgement and you will make a quantam leap in consciousness. the avoidance of pain is the essence of denial.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 23:59
#409395
Thank you, juangrande, for hearing what I was trying to say. Not that pain can be overcome by force of will, but that as human beings we can choose to receive it as a natural signal, or to multiply our suffering by entangling this signal with "higher" mental constructs like anger, resentment, denial. Or as you put it, Stay with the pain without judgement.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 00:13
#409412
seventree, stay with the pain and observe carefully. the things that are revealed in it's transformation are often astounding. many meditators wish only to find bliss and consequently avoid what is. often what resides in the "cellar" chakra-wise are the obstacles to liberation. "the deeper the roots the higher the reach".
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 12:45
#409748
stay with the pain don't shut this out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuiKJ0rRTAo
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 15:13
#409826
I love that part with the acid on his hand. actually Chuck Palahniuk has written several interesting novels centered around some of the themes we're discussing. He has definitely done some inner space exploration.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 11:17
#409677
I wonder if its the same Shinzen Young i met as a young man in LA @ the International Buddhist Meditation Center. At the time he was in the forefront of research into registering brain waves before and during meditation.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 15:07
#409822
Quite likely it was him. He resides/resided in LA. If you have a chance get access to "the science of enlightenment". long but worthy set of lectures w/ excellent basic guided meditations.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 17:16
#409033
Cd,
I see your point, but there are a few more layers to be peeled away before you can really appreciate the layers you are pulling away.
It's easy to let go of fear when you realize we are all individually on a suicide mission anyway. The question is what it is we are fighting for. What will truly advance the bigger game?
Reality is a function of expanding energy and contracting mass/structure. Life is constantly pushing out, like grass pushing up through the sidewalk and when it reaches its zenith, it sheds a few seeds, hardens and slowly crumbles back down. The problem is that we need that outer layer, that skin, that shell to give us form and place, but it also defines and limits us. Much like we select leaders, or form governments, businesses, institutions, etc. to provide structure, cohesion and form to further our expansion, but they eventually harden and become the crust that limits any growth not to their advantage. So then this conflict between the organism and its own definition develops, where either the organism sheds this form in order to grow another, larger one, much like a crustacean sheds its shell to grow larger, or the shell grows larger, like a mollusk grows another ring. Eventually though, the organism dies when growing bigger is not possible and its spawn start the cycle over.
We are humans and our current shell is crumbling as rapidly as those charged with managing it can repair it. This is not just the monetary system, but our religious and political models as well.
The source of abusive relationships is when the outer shell cannot expand sufficiently to enable the healthy growth of the internal organism. In the traditional nuclear family, the husband plays the role of the shell, protecting and defining the interior organism of the wife and children. When the husband is not able to mediate internal and external pressures, he will crush the internal energy and growth, often producing children who employ the same reactions. This relationship plays out in many of our institutional structures, religious, governmental, business, etc. When they have room and energy to expand and grow, it is ideal from those living in them. Everything is generally good and it's "The American Dream." The problem is when the going gets tough and there isn't enough to keep the children feed and they start complaining and Big Daddy starts getting frustrated. Consider the external pressures Germany considered itself to be under when it perpetuated the holocaust .
Remember Athens was a Democracy before the Tyrants and Rome was a Republic before the Caesars. Now the world is no longer America's lilypad and we are starting to complain Big Daddy is acting like a tyrant. The fact is the world isn't getting any bigger and the numbers of people and their desires are not taking this into account. Simply overcoming our fears isn't going to resolve this reality, but just make more suicide bombers for whatever causes those without fear believe in.
It is not a matter of "them," the evil overlords, vs "us," the trampled peoples. Safe to say, if our overlords could give us anything we want, they would, because it would increase their power and prestige. That's how they get that power in the first place. It is only when the pie gets smaller that the chosen few, who keep the structure going, get what they need and everyone else becomes fodder for the machine.
We are all going to have to start learning the nuances of this balancing act and how we can be parts of it. That's what growing up is about, when you understand the balance between getting and giving. Those at the top do understand they need us, but if we don't find ever more cooperative ways of functioning, there isn't the room for as many and it becomes an increasingly destructive fight over resources. At which point, those at the top are the most brutal tyrants, not compromising politicians.
A big part of our current mess is this debt based currency. When there wasn't the economic information to determine how much money to introduce and was up to those tribal chieftains we called kings to decide, tying the growth of the money supply to the growth of debt was actually a good idea, but our increasing ability to exploit the difference between debt and productivity is making it ever more outmoded. This doesn't mean using precious metals as the only reliable form of commercial exchange will be particularly efficient either.
We don't have to rise up and overthrow this system, because it is rapidly melting down, but we do need to start proposing some form of production based currency to take its place, since money is drawing rights to productivity.
Capitalism has been an effective model, but it is not synonymous with a free market. A market is like an ecosystem, with all number of companies occupying the various niches, cooperating and competing with each other. Capital is the medium in which they function. Those providing this medium are in the position to effectively tax every transaction. If they are a private enterprise, these taxes become exponentially increasing until they essentially own the entire economy. If this medium is a public function, then those taxes go to social and civil purposes, schools, roads, courts, police, etc, which either do not generate sufficient income directly, but are necessary, such as schools, or are best not to run as commercial enterprises, such as police and courts.
When private banking first arose, these banks were responsibly for prudently maintaining the value of their own currency, or went out of business, but with central banking, this responsibility has been socialized, while profits remain private. Necessarily banking will have to eventually become a public function, like police and the courts, to have a stable and sustainable free market function.
A debt based currency is inherently unsustainable in a situation of limited resources, since production must always grow to pay off debt and debt must increase in order to grow the money supply necessary for this production.
Another factor is treating money as property, rather than a form of public utility, because the tendency is to accumulate it when the fact remains that excess currency is inflationary. In fact, the Fed controls inflation by borrowing money back. By that logic, excess currency is in the hands of those with excess wealth, so everyone else has to pay them interest, through public funds, in order to control the excess of currency, resulting in them having even more excess currency. This is what is known as a negative feedback loop.
If people understood money is a form of public commons and subject to the requirements of such, they would be far more careful what value they take from personal relations and environmental resources to convert into money in the first place. This would be healthier for the environment, interpersonal relations and the stability of the money supply.
More thoughts on why we need to think this through and not just throw off the yoke of our oppression.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 02:47
#409472
The marvel of all history is the patience with which men and women submit to
burdens unnecessarily laid upon them by their governments.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 05:04
#409517
There is a flip side to everything. For many people, it is about being part of something larger, in order to give themselves more meaning, as well as security. Not to say that desire to belong isn't constantly taken advantage of, but occasionally is does have its moments of glory.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 05:56
#409522
Humans are by nature social creatures. A moment of glory can be found in realizing that once you can trust yourself to be completely honest with yourself and do so others sense this and symbiosis is achieved. The essence of catalyst within the sphere of intra human relationship. The key being in insisting upon the other achieving truthfulness within themselves and others so that a parasitic structure does not encounter a ripe situation to form.
http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ultranet/BiologyPages/S/Symbiosis.html
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 10:14
#409644
Miles, although I personally have not reached this level of awareness, I've been told that we also interact on a subtle energetic level where only our "true selves" reside. true as in "this is where I'm at ". no false personas. if we are in relationship with someone- comfortable or uncomfortable- the opportunity to reflect is presented. upon honest reflection, the dysfunctional aspect of the relations dissolves for all parties involved. essentially an energetic shift happens in the inter-dynamics. and it only takes one person's awareness to resolve the disfunction. back to "work on yourself, it's not their fault" theme. on a practical level, I've seen it happen although I can't testify to the modus operandi. What do you think?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 14:43
#409781
Some have referred to part of this concept as the "wounded healer" and this only partially gets at it. This "healer" reflection is rooted in ancient Greek philosophy and just like Plato's Republic's "most assuredly" it fails to appreciate the catalyst that is the warm embrace of "the reality" that life is a process of being focused on living with and in life rather than a process of dying without really living or embracing the pure joy of life and the energy that process creates. And in living one begins to appreciate that all life creates virtuous, self sustaining cycles of energy production and expenditure that within ourselves, in community with the whole or a portion of human society or indeed the whole physical universe forms the basis for what we sense as this "reflective" process.
When we are truly living as whole & complete persons as we are able we first begin to sense this dynamism (beyond infancy) in human community and this forms a basis to what many perceive as human "magnetism". When a "cold" or "dysfunctional" human is confronted with this reflected energy the responses I have seen most often, both in myself and others is either flight or an overwhelming sense of warmth. This cold or warmth state reflects itself back to the other human in this community of relationship and a positive feedback loop of energy is created. Aware on a conscious level or not.
I liken it, and poorly to a + & - poles of a battery, but it seems far more dynamic on the whole than a battery since the energy that is created is elemental and as self sustaining as we permit within ourselves. This is when the ego attempts to reassert itself. This is a point in process where the necessity of natural catalyst again asserts itself and the potential of "reflective" synergies which was the catalyst back at the point of the feedback loops inception begins the process anew or sustains the original feedback loop. To me all life rests upon dipping our selves and connecting our selves into or within this elemental energy source as it forms an essential basis of individual & collective life, human or otherwise and our consciousness.
This feels like bumbling and stumbling or more appropriately groping my way in the dark as I, like CD have not read into or studied these concepts in any serous formal, informal, structured or autodidactic way so I am simply reflecting back what has been encountered and/or experienced along the road.
My reference in passing: http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.3.ii.html
Thoughts?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 15:21
#409829
You guys are waaay more learned than I, but I agree with what I could grock. As far as that last paragraph about bumbling and mumbling, I see that sort of expression as personalizing "universal truth". It's in all of us waiting to be expressed, just more or less eloquently.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 16:55
#409861
Thanks for your illumination and for recognition of the potential of achieving both narrow & broad based sympatico.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 20:36
#410017
It is very much a function of that electrical polarity Miles relates it with. It doesn't have to be with other people either, but can just as well be with the entirety of any situation. Think of the tips of your fingers and how they are an extension of your sense of being. Now pick up some tool or utensil you are familiar with and sense how it is just a further extension of your hand. Now try feeling something you are not familiar with and sense the combination of positive and negative polarities as you familiarize yourself with it. Think in terms of how you relate to other people and how you are drawn to those you instinctively trust, in fact this attraction is the trust, as well as repelled by those you are not sure about, unfamiliar with, or really do not trust. Not to mention the infinite combinations of attraction and repulsion. Remember though, that those who are most successful at deceiving others are masters at manipulating this process. So always be willing to step back from your emotions and be sure where they are coming from. The great flaw in monotheism is that the source is the essence from which we rise, not an ideal from which we fell. Good and bad are not some metaphysical dual between the forces of light and darkness, but this basic binary dichotomy of attraction to the beneficial and repulsion of the detrimental.
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 07:29
#410419
"Remember though, that those who are most successful at deceiving others are masters at manipulating this process."
b-i-n-g-o, we're getting warmer
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 10:09
#410481
Tip - The thing is that those who manipulate and stipulate rather than congregate are easily discernible to those that do. Deceit only works when we subsist under the sufferance of our own self imposed deceit. Just as a recovering addict can spot an addict or an wife abuser (or the abused) can spot another of their kind at first glance the same applies here. Once the foundation and ruthless application of truthfulness is self applied lies and all of the associated crap become easily discernible.
Sociopaths subsist off the free energy of others being the personification of a parasite (see up a few comments for my reference). Deny this free source of energy and the sociopath withers and dies. This also applies to those who have assimilated the parasite and believe they can no longer live without it. Hence the call contained within CD's article to throw off this self imposed sufferance and subservience to the parasitic nature of the Ponzi. It really is that simple Tip.
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 11:21
#410558
Miles,
There are endless permutations of these relationships. The line between parasitic and symbiotic relationships is extremely relative and only completely clear in the extremes. Any growing organism has to consume more energy than it expends. The problem is how to structure an economic model which sustains the environment and stabilizes the economy, rather than draw as much value and resources out as fast as possible, which is what this debt based system does.
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 12:54
#410619
absolutely miles...thing is though is that everyone is at different stages. maybe it's helpful to sketch them out briefly in summary?
#1 : recognizing that the body has a parasite feeding off of it robbing it of energy. obstacles: the sophisticated mechanisms aura referred to above preventing recognition.
#2 : determining that the parasite is harmful to the body, rather than symbiotic. obstacles: this is what brodix talks about (also continuation of aura's point).
#3 : finding the will to cleanse the parasite from the body despite the obvious consequences. obstacles: crabcake has hammered this point home quite well below & earlier.
#4 : the cleanse itself. obstacles: a lonely, painful road with numerous signposts, with many of them simply substituting one harmful parasite for another (which way do i go?).
#5 : keeping the clean body immune from harmful parasites. what you wrote about here. although much easier to say you are going to do it, then actually being successful in practice yes? a collective (however loose) for interdependent support is essential in this stage. 'probiotics' also may prove to be quite helpful.
(note: the word 'body' is used as a loose metaphor, both in the individual & collective sense)
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 17:38
#409898
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 19:30
#409200
hahhahahhahahaaaaah! CognitiveDissonance, you rock!
I would have posted sooner, but I was basking in a "six degrees of kevin bacon" moment, lol. . .(wiki-able for those unfamiliar). . . was greatly enjoying this installment of yours, when I came to your link to Paul Levy, and burst into laughter.
some in my circle of friends have worked with him, and also know Mark Comings, who wrote the forward to Paul's book - recommend both the book and the intro, here's a juicy excerpt:
http://www.awakeninthedream.com/wordpress/?p=289
I first came to ZeroHedge because I sensed that the "financial reality" we exist in was going to be the next implosion in the collective "world" - and I wanted to keep tabs on it, even though I don't trade. . . I spent a few weeks just skimming, and grew to enjoy your posts (drawn by your moniker, natch), and began to look out for you here. . .
anyhow, I love that we're only four degrees of separation, and in a week of synchronicites unfolding, I can add your post today.
will be back to what I hope will be a great thread after I go outside for an integrative walk!
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 20:24
#409247
CA
Paul Levy and I talk weekly and I've been sharing my series with him before publication here on ZH to get his views and feedback. Or at least Paul gets the early versions. ZH gets the finished product. I stumbled upon Paul about a year ago as I was developing these ideas. I purchased his book and found we were on a similar path, with me bringing up the rear.
It's been interesting getting his input on my view of the collective insanity and it's manifestation. We find that we've often arrived at similar points from different directions that match quite well and it's been a learning experience sharing the process with each other as it unfolds.
Paul doesn't often get the opportunity to talk to someone else that has the same passion for the subject. Many see this as an interesting effect or occurrence within whatever they're studying or researching. Paul and I both feel this is not a side track but the central railroad line.
Of course, Paul has extensively studied it for decades and I'm just a pup at his knee. But we both have found value in our discussions because I bring the layman's point of view and with it the layman's explanation, while Paul brings the extremely detailed and technical exploration. It's been fun comparing notes with each other.
I'm delighted you know of Paul's work. More should and more are each day.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 23:55
#409398
ooh, what a gift to be able to talk often with someone as aware as Paul Levy while simultaneously creating your own work - synthesis indeed! no wonder your writing has so much energy - kudos!
while I've not met or worked with Paul, I have heard tales of his dreaming workshops, and I'm familiar with his concepts. . .although I don't read (books) as much as I once did, I'll definitely find a copy of his "bush" book, lol.
I've been a gypsy since I was old enough to be free to roam, lived in many different spaces, countries even - along the way of course, if you're open, you can sample other folks "realities" from the most mundane to those most heady. . . makes for great memories, stories, indeed. . .
while out walking earlier, I pondered what might be a good tale to share here, given that yours was so evocative. . .
years ago, while spending a few months in the Chicago area, I joined a group of people in a "workshop" led by a guy they all revered (I was just passing through, so had no expectations nor did he impress me all that much). . . the "goal" was to learn how to "channel healing energy" but he seemed to get sidetracked with a lot of "I see entities! let me extract them for you!" drama, hehe. . . it was entertaining, but also rather uncomfortable, as I really don't like be around "organised belief systems" all that much. . .
anyhow, the final "act" was for everyone to pair up and practice "healing" each other, which again, made me rather uncomfortable, but I went ahead - a rather elegant woman who had been less involved than most in the whole group dynamic made a beeline across the room to me as her partner. . . the leader began giving directions on the "procedure" he was teaching, I closed my eyes. . . and was overcome with what felt like a moving heaviness in my arms, running out towards my fingertips. . . it was palpable, and took me completely by surprise! I moved my hands as directed, around her "aura" (ie, never actually touching her), then I stopped hearing him speak, and felt where to focus the energy stream, an area where it felt dense, less clear. . . I remember I just wanted it to feel "lighter" - though had no actual word-thoughts around that. . .
and then everyone was all huggy as the leader called an end to the day, and I opened my eyes. . . the woman had tears running down her face, she hugged me, and said she had some disorder of her kidneys (I have no memory of the name, but it was apparently diagnosed as very serious by her doctor), and she felt I had "healed" her. . . still in a non-verbal headspace, I "heard" myself tell her that I had merely held the space for her to heal herself, that no ONE can heal but the self, when it's ready for the dis-ease to be gone. . . I can still see her eyes even now. . .
she tracked me down a few months later, as I'd left chicago soon after - she confirmed that her doctor had "no idea" why, but she was "in remission". . . and a few years later, apparently still. . . I did look into a few "hands on healing" modalities, but realised I didn't want to "be" that. . . and of course, I realise now that there's no real need to "train" or learn techniques, beyond dropping the belief that you can't do it. . . I have always sought the absolute freedom to follow my instincts & whims, investigate whatever I'm drawn to, even if it seems to conflict with something I've found "true" before. . . the older I get, the more grateful I am I've kept that promise to myself.
anyhow, thought you might find a bit to nod at there, hehe!
and again, thank you for the obvious work you've put into sharing your experiences here, and to the collective "Tylers" for a great, at times eclectic & irreverent, not to mention addictive, site!
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 07:05
#409541
Cathartes Aura
Funny that is only the second time I read about entities being pulled from bodies.
My ex wife, lying whore bitch she was, belonged to a cult. By the time I met her it was dying out. One afternoon I fell asleep on her couch. When I woke up I felt changed. I asked what she did and she claimed she pulled shit off my body. It was something she picked up from the cult. It was kind of disturbing like some internal motivating force had been excised.
Later I learned Reiki. I would try to practice on total strangers. Like a blind test. I frequently managed to stop chronic pain. What you did was a whole new firehose level.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 10:28
#409652
Cathartes Aura The Sufis call that Satnam Rasayan. Very effective method of healing when done properly. It's effectiveness being tied to the ability of the "healer" to hold the "space". Personally, I overcame cancer using this technique.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 12:59
#409757
p.s. cogdis, CA & JG also inadvertently both answered your question to me from earlier on energy with much more adequate eloquence that i could have achieved.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 22:03
#409342
science is so behind the curve when it comes to "reality". physics is "discovering" what mystics have always said. remove the filters and everything is clear. physics just keeps changing the filters. the logical mind as an exclusive means of perception will not likely arrive at what is.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 00:10
#409414
aye, mystics can hold the the time-less truths. . . the mystical scientists are a delight tho' - left brain / right brain & efforting the articulation when words aren't really cutting it, befuddled amusement. . .
what (supposedly) began as a re-action against ignorance & religious indoctrination has been co-opted for profit and control. . . that the "military" seeks to "own the weather" and sees no problem with poisoning "citizens" in the process shows how insane this world is now.
that "they" gender nationstates as "female" then seek to conquer / overthrow them is telling. . . as is gendering nature, then seeking control.
Mother Nature bats last.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 13:38
#409789
Interesting person. I like his line of thought as presented in the foward. Immediately did a libray search for the book, but had no luck.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 18:01
#409908
"Immediately did a library search for the book, but had no luck."
Are you talking about Paul Levy's book? Don't be put off by the title. It really is about the collective expression of our madness.
http://www.amazon.com/Madness-George-Bush-Reflection-Collective/dp/142590744X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1276383481&sr=8-1
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 19:44
#409219
I S W E A R Y O U M E N,,,, your absolutely gone. your utterly hilarious.
do you realize this website, ZH is the direct opposite of porn sites.
male bonding keyboarding men, getting in touch with their zen side.
sorry, guys but..................i am quite tickled, to witness this phenomenal occurrence.
me, i just visited my very first adult pleasure toy store.
really. i don't bs.
im a big girl now.
of course i purchased the best and the sleekest or cheekest.
quite an industry this self pleasuring thing.
well cheerio, i know watching WC soccer for the next couple of weeks, i will probably have to get off on an hourly basis. just wanted to bring some class into my many challenges in life. if you know what i mean.
now you know me by now and i probably will never come back to this POST to answer any of your questions.
oh the shop's name was
F A S C I N A T I O N S
ciao, bella†
a u d i o s
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 02:54
#409474
The internet caters to ALL kinds of perversions, including "Mental Masturbation!"
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 13:01
#409761
"of course i purchased the best and the sleekest or cheekest."
such a good consumer you were...
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 19:54
#409226
CD, I appreciate your exploration. I especially resonate with idea and practice of examining the "obscurations" or the veils of our personality/ego that keep us in a familiar place. By simply being with and examining and experiencing the delusions and beliefs and patterns, they disolve naturally over time.
When I get impatient, then I can ask, rightfully, "what is it I think I am going losing by this issue or "problem" arsing. "Who" is it that is struggling to "arrive," or "obtain," and where do they think they are going to "get." Other questions: what is fear, what is obtaining?
Keep up the good work.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 02:58
#409475
"I am NOT the biocomputer. I am NOT the programmer. I am NOT the programming. I am NOT the programmed. I am NOT the program."
John C. Lily, "The Center of the Cyclone"
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 20:06
#409238
Thank's CD!World-class stuff!(I gotta go read # 3 now)
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 20:34
#409261
I don't know CD, are you looking for self-actualization and enlightenment or a way out of this economic crisis?
As for self-actualization, I agree that all beings should go through this process and unfetter themselves from cultural and ideological limitations.
However, when I found out that the banks don't make loans, but rather access your own credit at the US Treasury. Then, they withhold your credit ( illegally) and make you pay it back with interest-- a thing that you own fully-- that pisses me off. And I don't blame myself for this kind of trickery. I blame the average high school/university education that most of us are subjected.
If my parents had been masons, judges, lawyers, employees of the US Treasury, or high level banking executives, I would have known better. But nobody told me the real truth of my commercial transactions with the bank.
As you say, it takes pain sometimes to wake up to your own powers. Between 2003 and 2004, I invested the better part of my retirement funds into real estate. Two rentals, my principal residence, and a warehouse for business. I got loans for these properties, but when the economy turned I paid off two and let the rentals go into foreclosure (one is still in extend and pretend land). This pain made me investigate the mortgage loans and the Uniform Commercial Code.
The power I took back: I wrote a letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and outlined the precise manner in which I was defrauded by the bank. Thereafter, the bank called me and then asked what I wanted to have my rental back. I told the CEO of the bank that I wasn't going to send any money (money is just debt notes anyway). What I would do is discharge my debt by sending the bank three pieces of the paper (effectively writing my own debt notes): the presentment "Accepted for Value," the Bill of Exchange, and the performance bond (promise to pay). I also sent them a new offer saying to discharge the debt, rescind the foreclosure notice, and file a new Deed of Trust with the County Recorder. In a few weeks, I'm going to send them a Confirmation of Discharge of debt for this account and order the bank to send me a reconveyance on the property.
They never answer, and they are in dishonor now.
If there is any illusion in all this, it's that we think we know how to handle our commercial affairs. In fact, the TPTB have done everything to hide how to handle our own commercial affairs. One cannot do this without first filing a UCC Financing Statement. The bottom line is that I have been productive all my life, and they have contrived to steal my productive capacity. Now I am going to file UCC recoupment for every property I have ever owned and got loans for.
Since I am not a federal employee, I will not file a 1040 form as a federal employee. From now on, I will file my forms to get the income tax I paid to the bank, butcher, gas station or whatever returned to me, as it should be. Is it my fault too that my CPA filed falsely claiming I'm a federal employee knowing I would need to pay tax?
As I posted previously, I am for getting rid of all the big lies.
So tell me, since I am not a federal employee, why has my CPA been preparing my 1040 forms to lead me to pay taxes? Is that my fault too?
As far as I'm concerned, this is no illusion-- I've been ripped off and I don't like.
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 20:45
#409272
The intro is not the best, but do scroll down to the essay.
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-David-Bohm-Holographic-Universe.htm
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 21:58
#409319
best one yet cd.
I have dated 2 (quantum) physicists and when they spoke about their trade, it was as if they spoke of God to me, a Catholic back from jaunts into a variety of other disciplines.
talk your book, it is 1, ;)))
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 22:08
#409346
Superb
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 23:00
#409379
CD - terrific read- been looking on for a while. Humility came up earlier, and it occurred to me that people like you with multi- talents are often very humble, while many lesser talents have a need for self- importance. So you left carpentry behind to pursue investment advising? I went from psychology to farming and never once regretted it. All the book titles mentioned have been a trip down memory lane, having read most of them decades ago. Wishing you well from the land of 10000 lakes.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 12:43
#409746
uraniuman,
I try to remind myself daily of one concept. The more I know, the more I know that I don't know.
I must always be ready and willing to drop my beliefs and worldview in order to make room for other ideas and concepts. Afterwards I can pick my worldview up, dust it off and modify it to accomidate what I just learned. As I said in another article.....
"After decades of trying to do things “my way or the highway” I’ve learned the hard way it’s best to navigate life with an open mind and a loosely held belief system, in the same manner one might gently cradle a delicate butterfly rather than desperately clutch a huge sack of potatoes. By doing so, when something doesn’t fit my worldview or belief system, I simply let go and let it mold itself into any shape that’s required to fit the new information. Contrary to what one might think, this doesn’t result in radical changes but rather subtle movements. The key is mental and emotional flexibility and with lots of practice and a healthy dose of courage, it can be as easy as that."
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/end-empire-waking-zombie-nations-psychology-consciousness-and-egoic-mind
on Fri, 06/11/2010 - 23:25
#409388
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4f3d5ZdE4vY&feature=related
TELEVISION lyrics - Venus (De Milo)
(Tom Verlaine)
was a Tattooed night, streets so bright.
The world was so thin between my bones and skin
there stood another, person, who was a little surprised
to be face, to face, with a world so alive.
how I fell.
Didja feel low? No, Huh???
I fell right into the Arms... of Venus de Milo.
You know it's all like some new kind of drug.
My senses are sharp and my hands are like gloves.
Broadway looks so medieval -
it seemed to flap, like little pages:
and I fell sideways laughing with a friend from many stages.
How we felt.
Didja feel low? Not at all, Huh???
I felt right into the Arms... of Venus de Milo.
Suddenly my eyes went so soft and shaky.
oh I knew there was pain, but pain is not aching.
Then Richie, Richie said:
"Hey man let's dress up like cops
Think of what we could do!"
something, something, it said "you better not."
And I fell.
Didja feel low? No, Huh???
i stood up walked out the arms.....
of venus de milo.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 00:24
#409419
wow, just wow. speechless.
been a fan of verlaine since seeing television onstage in 1978. . . last caught him a couple of years ago, re-unioned, at Seattle's EMP with its unreal soundstage.
genius.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 00:49
#409422
yes, and all right! let us post another...
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OULLiXkwVck&feature=related
.
"gettin funny, prove it, just the facts..."
...
"chirp chirp, the birds, there giving you the words,
the world is just a feeling,
you undertook." t.v.
in its glory.......
Television - Prove It Lyrics
the docks, the clock, a whisper woke him up
The smell of water would resume
The cave, the waves of light, the unreal night
flat curving of a room
getting funny
Prove it, just the facts, confidential
Ah this case, this case, this case, that I
I've been workin' on so long, so long
First you creep, then you leap
Up about a hundred feet
You're in so deep
that you could write a book
Chirp, chirp, the birds
They're giving you the words
The world is just a feeling you undertook
Prove it, just the facts, confidential
And this case, this case, this case, that I
I've been workin' on so long, so long
Now the rose, how it slows
You in such colorless clothes
Fantastic, you lose your sense of human
Project, protect
It's warm and it's calm and it's perfect
It's too, too, too to put a finger on
Prove it, just the facts, only confidential
And this case, this case, this case, that I
I've been workin' on so long, so long
This case is closed
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 01:12
#409438
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO073fekFfA
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 01:51
#409446
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVxfPylCGhw&feature=related
last one, not to be missed.....
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 01:59
#409455
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwrCUEMl76U&feature=related
.
ha. turn it up. up, way up. it just sounds better that way.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 02:04
#409458
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmyAFHcF07Y
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 03:05
#409479
Perhaps the best response that ALL of us sheeple can give to the final financial collapse is a rousing cheer of "Bravo! Thanks for the entertainment, now we're going to get on with our lives and file out of the theatre!"
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 05:30
#409524
Normally, I just read and don't yap.
But I am amazed at the number of self-actualized people here, with so little to learn and so much to tell.
And yet, despite all this harnessed actualization, the world continues to make a large sucking sound whenever I open the windows.
All of the "educational" replies make we wonder: Are we all really taking charge of at least bits of our reality, or just blowing smoke up the asses of other delusionists?
Lots of theory, not much "Here's how I do it down at the chicken ranch," coming off my monitor on this thread.
Personally, it got me thinking about how to start reaching out to our little cul-de-sac and start getting ready to consider the possibility that our lives are going to change in the foreseeable future. Most aren't ready to hear it yet, but some are at least willing to complain about it to me. And that's how I plan to plant my little seeds.
Thanks to CD for getting the juices flowing for me.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 06:35
#409535
Thank you. This is the reason I published what were originally personal reflections, to help people see that we/they have the power to change. What they change is up to them. We have forgotten how powerful we are. ZH is a wonderful place for me because it is often contrary. Alternative universes are allowed here, even encouraged.
While I don't always agree with the people who comment, having been here long enough to "know" the regulars, I understand that I will never have a complete understanding because I'm just a small piece and realization comes from seeing through other eyes as well as my own. Empathy is the path to understanding others as well as ourselves.
Some comments claim I think too much or I have it wrong. That might be so. This is why the series is so detailed, because I wish people to see not only that I arrived here but how I got here. No person's path will be the same as mine but I've found that when entertaining the "what if" perspective, the possibilities are endless. I wanted people to see possibilities, to be energized.
This series is one long trip and not 5 separate walks. This was the danger of publishing as separate articles. People forget what was said in prior chapters. In Chapter 5, I finish and then try to pull it all together. It has been surprisingly difficult because I've never really sat down and determined exactly what I "thought" meaning how I'm going to deal with this insanity, what it means to me.
I suspect that many people will find, if they were to sit down and write like I have, that many of their ideas and beliefs don't fit together very well. This series forced me to cull the silly and nonsensical thoughts and beliefs from my tool box and put them aside. Hopefully I'll be able to integrate them later or finally release them. Maybe not. Doesn't matter. I wrote this first and foremost to heal. That is being accomplished.
Anyway, thank you for letting me know that your creative process was stimulated.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 06:40
#409536
Dr. Sandi
Self actualized means just that, it does not encompass others. The truth is you can never make anyone else think or understand. They need to work it out for themselves. Most people are incapable of that.
I watched some shitty eighties western. The plot revolved around some criminal who was sentenced to a jail out in the middle of nowhere. Just a single building and he wasn't even locked in. The end point was the jailer explaning how he could have left anytime he chose but he never even considered it.
That is how people are they choose to remain in their own self administered cells. But it works for them so who am I to change their ways.
Realization is personal, you can change yourself. Only yourself.
Once a person changes themselves then they understand just how truly free they are. How they have been scared of illusions and rumors.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 07:00
#409540
Anyone interested in starting down the junior mystic path read the Illuminatus Trilogy. Then Still life with the woodpecker. Then Cosmic Trigger by Robert Anton Wilson.
The thing is you will not choose to read Illuminatus trilogy it will choose you. It will change your outlook on just about everything. Very mind opening, like literary acid.
And while reading it strange shit will happen to you. Maybe it has always been happening and Illuminatus just attunes you, who knows.
After you wade through those fun tomes try Gurdjiefs Meetings with remarkable men.
Then your mind is open to follow where your own path leads. It may be Casteneda, it may be Zen, it may be Crowley or Lilly or Leary or even Charles Stross.
But you will be changed.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 10:47
#409661
Speaking of R.A.W., this audiobook recording was amazing. I have rapidshare links, if anyone is interested.
Robert Anton Wilson Explains Everything 5 CD set
"From the author of the legendary underground bestseller The Illuminatus! Trilogy and more than thirty other books comes a long-awaited audio event: Robert Anton Wilson Explains Everything. This once-in-a-lifetime, 12-session recording captures one of the most unconventional and brilliant writers of this century in conversation, and makes available to Wilson’s legion of fans a refreshing insider’s view of this enigmatic (and often misunderstood) author. Robert Anton Wilson discusses such topics as futurist psychology, the paranormal, God, conspiracies real and imagined, James Joyce, “guerrilla ontology” – plus rare personal reflections on his extraordinary life."
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 12:02
#409713
Wynn
Interesting guy. Sad that he died. Then again almost all the pioneers of consciousness are, Leary, Casteneda, so on. So are the others involved like Kesey and Garcia.
Ain't no one pushing those boundaries these days.
You may as well say that dream is dead.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 13:10
#409767
maybe the dream is not dead, but just diffused into the minds of a thousand anonymous caterpillar monkeys.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 14:29
#409810
tip e. canoe
Doesn't work that way.
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 07:33
#410422
says who?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 07:17
#409548
Well I'm not a big fan of Jung or spiritualism so I was pleasantly surprised that you didn't lean too much in that direction. The real life examples you provided fleshes out your ideas. Sometimes I get lost in the language because the mystical vocabulary is flowery and vague. I'm more of the Thoreau type. Keep life simple and stay connected to the rythms of Nature. The peace will come.
That was thought provoking. You got me thinking in ways I never did before. The power government and banks have over us (we give them) has been an eyeopener for me these past couple of years. The barriers we put in front of ourselves is a battle. One wheelbarrow at a time is a good way of putting it. If the problem looks too big to overcome, make the problem smaller and deal with that. I am doing the small things in my life. I was never taught to push back. My parents are trusting and submissive. So for me, I am learning to challenge. It takes courage to change your behaviour. One of my priorities is to teach my children to think for themselves, but also to challenge authority if they don't make sense. My youngest has already sent a zinger back to her kindergarten teacher.
I think that you are definitely on to something with your remedy for change but I'm of the opinion the change will soon be upon us no matter what because of the math. I'm geting the vibe from the pace of things now that the pieces are in already in motion and by the time we collectively act it will already be over. So I think the key now is to be prepared to act decisively post collapse. To be the voice of reason when chaos and confusion is swirling around and the PTB are spinning their lies to create the new order.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 11:06
#409625
dupe but here a time thing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3oIiH7BLmg&feature=channel
. and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJybVxUiy2U&feature=related
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 10:06
#409626
persons might enjoy this these?
http://www.swarmusa.com/vb4/entry.php/55-The-Empathic-Civilization-and-Why-We-Need-Explorers
.
the empathetic civilization and explorers.
here a link with more good, on the right, links.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7AWnfFRc7g&feature=player_embedded#!
.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 10:48
#409662
CD - Having finished chapter 3 and now 4, together with comments, a first reaction includes dusting off decades of dozens of memories. Reflecting with you as you recount a bio that illumines 'How I learned to embrace insanity' is remarkable in that nowhere do you employ any of the infinite number of systems of ethical coordination offering handholds along the way to the essays conclusion. Your readership is well versed and more than eager to root for its favorite man made form of affirmation, witness the comments. But you in your wisdom, have avoided intractable references while keeping the focus on one's perception and involvement of truth and lie. Avesta - Breach of faith stems from the choice between truth and lie again and again made by the essence of the person at the beginning of the way and in decisive hours.... the choice being true - being false.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 11:55
#409701
Isn't the point of all of this writing that, for most things we encounter in life, it is not possible to know which is the truth and which is the lie? There is just too much information available for any of us to be able to process it all. This information overload results in us having to choose/embrace blindly over and over. (This truth applies to those in leadership positions as well as to those of us here.) This truth is summed up nicely in secular conversation by the following exchange that I frequently hear: "You tell me to strive always to do the right thing. I want to do the right thing. I'm pepared to do the right thing. Problem is, in this choice I have to make, I can't figure out which one is the right thing." In order to make the "right" choice, we have to have the ability to calculate the consequences of each choice available to us many steps out into the future. None of us has the ability to do that perfectly, although some are better at it than others.
The only antidote to any of this is - education. CD demonstrates this truth. He was educated and now he is educating others. Problem is, what is the standard against which we can measure CD's truth in order to see how close it is to primary reality (what is). Maybe what he is teaching here is all still secondary reality (what is perceived). I'm guessing that we can be educated to figure out how to build a rocket and shoot it so that it intercepts the moon in its orbit (the standard is "did we hit the moon"?). I'm less optomistic that we can be educated to the point that we can accurately figure out which is more correct, Islam or Christianity (that standard here would be what?).
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 11:21
#409680
CD i weep with the disservice to myself, hoping to come to terms with the self i either hate or want to change and improve, dying of self, the greatest gift i can give to others and facing the inevitable, pushing for the light out of the darkness. I haven't read all your posts yet but feel your honesty in your words, that just make me weep. empathy carries me through to fight another day. realism bites hard around here;) ty cd
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 11:32
#409688
That nail in your leg really got to me.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 17:18
#409892
gr8 username.
"we've been trodding on the wine press much too long....rebel....rebel....the babylon system is the vampire...sucking the blood of the sufferers...even in church and university...deceiving the people continually...tell the children the truth...right now."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5EoiQX7u5k
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 00:14
#410249
thnx & right back atchya epsilom...
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 10:57
#410532
Hopscotch is a family game.
I wouldn't go back now for any amount of money (or anything else) - Miles Kendig
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 11:37
#409690
@ brodix
" Necessarily banking will have to eventually become a public function, like police and the courts, to have a stable and sustainable free market function."
yes!
.
http://www.swarmusa.com/vb4/showthread.php/2333-Debt-Can-Never-Be-Repaid-By-Bankster-Design
.
Debt Can Never Be Repaid, By Bankster Design
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 21:42
#410087
If you read between the lines, this is actually a very good situation. They have set themselves up to fail by taking on far more than they could ever manage. If they hadn't been so greedy, but had remained a quiet parasite within the system, they could have kept this up for far longer. Now it becomes Capitalism vs, the rest of humanity. Eventually the tide will turn, as even the politicians and mainstream media realize whose side they have to be on.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 22:51
#410163
hope springs eternal. good for you. your "eyes are like telescopes"! t.v.
i recently stated to a local public commissioner that the nature of the debt basis
of our money system was the cause of local and regional apparent
inability of "wealthy" communities to afford Basic Services, further
stating that the "banks" / fed were the recipients of the value of the system.
the response was "yes, but we are the banks." meaning the people or public
is represented by the banking community.
i did protest that "no, we are not the banks", they will be bailed out, you and i
will not.
on other occasions i have asked local leaders if they understood how money,
federal reserve notes, were created and how they enter the money system.
they had, really, no idea.
i say this not to display superior smarts, i'm really not, but to say the general level of
education on the subject is so bad, like a faith based religion, that the reform
that is coming is likely to be one pile of shit that will be sold as peach
pudding, if you catch my drift. very few will be able to discern the difference
and this gives me pause and cause for concern.
basic ignorance is seen as "plausible deniability" , i think this is why the
public discourse is so vague and avoids , void of, discussion of systemic fundamentals.
a common phenomena, dazling and complex tangential extrapolations based on
nothing or partially fudged basics and imaginary hypothetical functions.
anyway...
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 07:38
#410424
basic ignorance is seen as "plausible deniability" , i think this is why the public discourse is so vague and avoids , void of, discussion of systemic fundamentals.
excellent point, good diggin blindman
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 11:47
#410585
blindman,
Also keep in mind that the banking system and the current government budgeting process exist in a symbiotic relationship, where governments are encouraged to overspend because their constituents like having more services than they pay for and the banks are quite willing to loan the money.
Consider the Federal budgeting process, where enormous spending bills are passed by handing out enough goodies to get enough legislators on board and then the president can only pass or veto it. This bears no relationship to the process of actual budgeting, which is to prioritize and then set the level of spending that can be afforded. It only serves to expand spending far above what can be afforded by having everyone complicit.
A method which occurred to me back in the days of discussion about the line item veto, would be to have the legislature break the bills down into all their constituent lines, then have every legislator assign a percentage value to each item. The bill would then be reassembled in order of preference and the president would be the one to draw the line at what could be afforded. This would divide responsibility, with the legislature setting priorities and the president setting the spending limit, rather than just letting the president do both, with the legislature reduced writing the menu, as the line item veto would have.
Of course, it would totally blow apart our entire current financial model, since ever increasing government debt is the foundation of our savings.
A local public banking system, which paid for public services in the communities that generated the savings in the first place, would provide many of the services currently paid for by the Federal government. Since community bonds would grow more organically stronger, we wouldn't need as much help in every aspect of our lives from big brother.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 12:04
#409717
Part of the problem for everyone is failing to understand this key point " If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him".
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 13:07
#409765
cd, et al.
more associated thoughts.
everything, everything is connected. perceiving this is limited
by our inability to be present, exist, be conscious, in the
present moment. as the i/I construct/narrative is of the past but
from / sourced in the present energetics (evolved neuro) and is energized
by the "feeling"/heart and/or fear of the possible threatening future, or driven and intoxicated
by the possible rewarding/mind future, or both.
or there is / are two i s', possibilities/potentials/poles , one oriented in the moment and the other
in the narratives of time past/future in oppositional spin or wave motion.
the mind containing the descriptive, intelligence becoming knowledg,
narrative links of increasing and expanding complexity, but the process
seems to be fundamental as you have been nicely describing.
it will come down to/ has come down / is all about each I standing,
founded in knowledge and knowing. the repository of first/last resort for mankind
is the knowing of the I. when dynamics are extreme, when change comes,
when the infrastructure of our creations become burdens, when the collective
consensual norms and litany of the "we" has insanity writ large at its entry then
it is only the knowledge of I that will sustain mankind. the I that is thoroughly
integrated in the present moment and the past/future narrative, in knowledge
of the dynamics and process.
thank you all for trying to educate
'me'. we. a poor student, but i haven't given up
on integrating the rational and the irrational. aye. I.
the ancient and perennial art of consciousness, being human. now i must kill the Buddha.
burn after reading.
eye.
by killing the buddha, he lives. if he is worshiped, he dies. no?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 14:15
#409803
blindman
"by killing the buddha, he lives. if he is worshiped, he dies. no?"
No. By killing the Buddha you free yourself to attain enlightenment on your own. You remove an extraneous factor which actually hinders your understanding.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 14:45
#409818
perhaps same thing or same/same. zam zam. waters.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zamzam_Well
aside...
.
or "You remove an extraneous factor " ie. kill the projection of the idea or ideal
of being. the idea of being, sacrificed for / versus the being of being or the verbe becoming
in conceptualization (symbolically transcribed-linguistic-narrative and cognitive mapping)
a noun, I, the verbe. a thing or a state but it was never such a thing but is of a separate time,
present moment, living breathing being. ie the buddha lives in your being not in your
thinking , imaging, or even understanding. as you don't know how you do it, there is no
"way", ("the great way has no gate..etc."), you just know you can do it. ?
be. ever present and sentient. yes?
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 14:22
#409802
So, I ask again: will being fully concious in the moment enable a color-blind person to perceive the color green? Will being fully concious in the moment allow the dyslexic to finally comprehend what is presented on the printed page? Will the adult who has the mind of a two-year-old perceive the truths presented in this thread?
Our inability to perceive cannot all be traced back to the moment we failed to kill the Buddha. Our ability to perceive is influenced by biological issues in the brain and by our level of education (and I don't mean just formal schooling by this). There are cognitive limits on perception. We cannot possibly process all of the information there is to be processed. This means we cannot possibly perceive all that there is to be perceived.
It is true that we can get better at knowing ourselves. But, ultimately, our ability to do this is determined by things other than our own will to do so.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 14:26
#409807
RichardP
"will being fully concious in the moment enable a color-blind person to perceive the color green?"
It depends. If his one true desire was to perceive the color green then he would fail because he has maintained an attachment. If he has no desire, including the desire to attain enlightenment, then seeing green does not matter.
Enlightenment is about freeing yourself from anything which maintains a hold on you. Just like the biblical line about how a rich man can not enter heaven. What you really achieve is no mind. A state where everything IS. Right now we place value and artificial meaning on objects. A rock is. It doesn't matter to the rock if it is Gold or Shale, it exists in and of itself. We stumble along and claim one has more value than the other.
Doing that moved us from objective reality, where everything is, to subjective reality where we interpret how things are.
Enlightenment keeps us in that perfect moment where we have no thought, no distraction, no interpretation. Where we are the whole. And the whole is us.
Be here now.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 15:33
#409833
reiterate DA BOMB RP pretty much gotta do the work to grasp what gully is saying. just saying
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 21:50
#410093
The absolute, the universal state, is basis, not apex, so a spiritual absolute is the essence from which we rise, not an ideal from which we fell. Complexity emerges from simplicity, not the other way around.
And it has taken literally hundreds of millions of years to reach our level of complexity, which makes it damn difficult to unravel.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 23:53
#410216
juangrande - I get what Gully is saying. And I don't disagree with anything he just said. I think he said it very well. I am simply adding a footnote to all of this.
Gully said: "Enlightenment is about freeing yourself from anything which maintains a hold on you." I am simply asking, what is it about us that enables us to do this freeing? Saying that we should free ourselves implies that we posses a will to action and the education to know what action we should will to do. Do you think that synapses and neurotransmitters and level of education (or the absence of same) have any influence over our ability to free ourselves? We cannot do or be anything more than what the physical construct of our brains and the level of our education will allow us to be. If my mother did drugs and didn't ingest the right vitamins while she was pregnant with me, I'm likely not going to be able to let go and just be the whole, no matter how much you might encourage me to do this. There are reasons other than fear or stupidity that explain why people don't self actualize or gain enlightenment.
And I'm still wondering how "being the whole" is going to get the babies fed. On the other hand, anyone who has ever fed babies until they can go off on their own as young adults understands how quickly the ego has to be banished during this task.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 14:36
#409813
"Our fear is entirely under our control because we make it real or not."
Fear (of pain, more accurately, of death) is neither real nor unreal. It is a manifestation of our intellect. If you trace fear to its origins, you will find that only once the fear of death is transcended, can a life of freedom begin.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 15:32
#409836
I've heard "fear is absence of love" or maybe absence of realized love. love being the term used to describe the all encompassing creative/destructive energy life force @$#%%&^ or whatever!!??
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 17:06
#409880
juangrande
"I've heard "fear is absence of love" or maybe absence of realized love."
I would doubt that. Our Monkey brain tends to play dark and light games, Hate opposite of Love, Anger opposite of Joy, so on. In reality each emotion is merely that an emotion. They are neither good nor bad, they exist as part of us.
You learn to understand what makes you angry you can comprehend the triggers and what they mean to you. Embrace emotions instead of the eradication many assume is the correct approach.
Emotion is what keeps us from being rocks. Having only one emotion, say Happiness, is just as unbalanced as having none.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 18:06
#409910
"Emotion is what keeps us from being rocks. Having only one emotion, say Happiness, is just as unbalanced as having none."
....or is just as unbalanced as having all.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 18:07
#409912
gully monkey mind like shiny bobble, need shiny bobble.<<>> yeah I agree with what your saying. maybe love was the wrong terminology. I'm not talking about desirous love, but the inexplicable God love. if you have got a good grasp of that then fear is known as the illusion it is. now, of course, fear in terms of a rattlesnake about to bite you is essential to survival. but to not walk in the woods because you might get bit, that's illusory. emotions are a part of the human make up and like everything else they must be included in your mindfulness.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 18:13
#409916
There is a lot of conjecture here upon philosophy, and I thought I might take a moment to step away from that. I believe that realization is the most important thing, the only thing really, but that's not what CD's piece is about in the end.
I am afraid.
I am afraid that if I work strike in order to tax strike lawfully, and thus stop supporting a government regime that does not represent me, that I will lose my job.
I am afraid that if I stop paying my mortgage in protest of TBTF, and government Real Estate bailouts that bailout the mortgagors but not the mortgagess, that I will lose my house.
Though I know both of the above to be the ethical and moral thing to do I am scared that my spouse will not understand and could jeopordize my marriage.
I am afraid to do the right thing because I am a slave, and I could lose everything that I hold dear. I am afraid to do the right long term thing for the sake of my child and country, because the cost is short term apocalyse at the personal level.
I am afraid that my personal righteousness will not move the mountain. What if I do the right, moral, and ethical thing and in the end I am unsuccessful in bringing the changes that I believe to be imperative.
Am I the only one? I can only think that is not the case. I would venture most here are fearful of not investing in an insane market, because they are afraid for their livelihoods, professions, savings, and retirements. I would venture to say that many are fearful in the same way that I am, and many await for the balance of inaction to be clear. The problem is that once the balance is clear, we will live in a fully police controlled corporatist state.
I am afraid, and while this may seem to be just a post; it is painful to realize fully in black and white.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 20:59
#410042
Crab, you are definitely not the only one. Each question you ask is important, but if you are self-actualized you realize too that you can give everything up-- Your job, your money, your lifestyle, even your country. For me I still hold unto my loved ones. Agape is in my vocabulary, but not in me.
And after you give up everything, you can have everything back! Create your own business, follow the UCC laws explicitely (learn to discharge your debt correctly and you can't loose your house). Learn to reclaim the allodial rights that were granted for the piece of land where your property lies. Use the online BLM search; it's fun. Learn to use recoupment to get your money back for all the credit you've given the bank for all the mortgage loans you've had.
I pulled all money out of the market in 2008. But this market is perfect for some options trading. It's tough, but you can earn some money by maintaining discipline.
As I now understand the tax code, income tax return is the return of income to you since every cent you pay each day is a tax upon your earning capacity. Everything is already pre-paid for us in a debt-based monetary system. So if we pay with Federal Reserve Notes for food or a service we are in fact paying a tax. Right is wrong, wrong is right. Flip your concept of Income tax Return and you are onto something new. The method to file is done by filing 1099A,B,C, etc forms (don't use deductions any more) for everything you paid FRNs during the year. Then, make sure you get back at least 1/3 of all you paid out.
There's not much news that is reassuring. The PTB will rule for a pace. It will be difficult, and people will loose their lives. Many people will defend the Constitution for the United States. But in the end, the system the TPTB has set up is so corrupt that it will collapse of its own accord.
Imagine that you were living in the last days of Babylon or Rome. Make your preparations accordingly. There will be no quarter. I have family and children--They must all shift with the tide of history. You are their perfect teacher.
If you see the Buddha on the road, kill him. So ignore what I've written and research and rethink for yourself what is really happening with mortgage loans and the Uniform Commercial Code.
All descriptions given here are for entertainment only. I am not a lawyer or a qualified investment advisor.
I'm down in Costa Rica right now. There's a book called "Escuela Para Todos" (School for All) being sold in every street corner in Latin America. I read through it out of curiosity. It is pushing banking lies and credit propaganda on people all over Latin America. And a religious organization is publishing this propaganda. Don't feel bad, the cycle goes on...
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 21:09
#410053
"I am afraid."
You are afraid because you are unsure. It is your child and wife that demand your attention. You will know when it is time to act otherwise.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 22:04
#410113
Cognitive Dissonance
Have you considered the following?
The orthopedic specialist experience is only a fraction of the field of medical practice, so perhaps the doctor's (therefore the patient's) attitude is lacking a complete perspective?
From where I sit as a primary care physician, this universe is ordered exactly as it should be. There is no such thing as randomness. Cognitive dissonance results from the mistaken notion that the self has power to solve the self's problems. I utterly disagree with you.
Just because you know what is good does not mean you will do what is good. Some people cannot do what is good (even at the expense of their own lives) because........they do not have the self control to do what is good--even if it means they die.
So, the question becomes: how does one obtain the power to do the right thing? Such power does not come from the inner self. If it did, we'd be able to ward off disease and death permanently by our own mind's willing it. (Never mind the notion that humans cannot even consider for very long that they will someday die).
"I think that what one has to do is decide there's someone supreme." (a direct quote from Gary Player).
To control yourself, you need help. If you're seeking wisdom (what to invest your money in) you need help. You cannot find this information inside yourself. Get in contact with the source of wisdom in the universe, the creator. Pray to almighty God.
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 22:30
#410134
"Have you considered the following?"
Yes I have.
Have you considered the following?
"Man is addicted to far more than just cheap energy and technology. We’re hooked on the superficial power of Gods at the expense of everything else around us, including ourselves. Like an addict who no longer scores to get high but simply to stave off the pain of withdrawal, the thrill is gone and the old glorious highs of yesteryear are just a fuzzy pain filled memory. Our deal with the devil, with ourselves really, is coming due and we’re rapidly slipping into total madness to avoid the recognition that we’ve met the demon and the demon is us.
Even if the reader doesn’t agree with the thesis I’ve offered, there’s little doubt the big picture I’ve sketched is accurate. The fecal matter is clearly on an accelerating trajectory towards the fan. So what am I going to do about this? What are you going to do about this? What are we going to do about this? If not us, who? If not now, when? These are legitimate questions that must be asked and answered regardless of our righteous indignation over the unfairness of the burden. We are the one and only solution to “we” the problem.
Do we really think we can step aside and watch the insanity work itself out to some unknown conclusion and not be splattered with stray brains and fecal matter? Worse, do we think this is someone else’s problem? When it really gets bad, we can’t escape to some off world safe house as intergalactic tourists, where we mingle with the friendly natives until the fat lady sings it’s time to return. This is not sane thinking. If it is, then beam me up Scotty because I’m sure as hell ready. Maybe while I’m visiting I can sell those aliens some iPhones. Wait; doesn’t that make me the alien?"
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/welcome-insane-asylum-%E2%80%93-our-collective-psychosis-chapter-2
on Sat, 06/12/2010 - 23:26
#410179
I've read your stuff. My question is: When you get to to the end of yourself, what will all this matter?
on Sun, 06/13/2010 - 00:53
#410261
CD - Unfortunately, this life is a class project and the slackards in the group are going to get the same grade as the folks who do most of the work. Stress about your part of the project that you have control over and let the rest go. Control where you bank, what you eat, who you love, what you grow, and who you educate. Be true to yourself and to your ideals in the space where you live (including here). In the end, that is all any of us can do.
You've read history. You know about the rise and fall of empires. You know that the plebes have always been destroyed along with the leadership that made the bad choices. Why should things be different during this time period just because we live in it? To think that things shouldn't happen as they always have, just because we are alive and it will affect us, is the ultimate expression of ego. But I understand the sentiment. It is the will to live and the desire to know that our lives matter.