You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

"We've Never Seen this Before – Such a Huge Rally, and the Little Guy Is Out"

George Washington's picture




Joseph Stiglitz says that Wall Street is hyping up the economy to sell more stock.

Has it worked?

Well, the stock market certainly has rocketed up from its March lows.

But many investors are still avoiding equities.

As Vincent Deluard - a strategist for TrimTabs Investment Research (25% of the top 50 hedge funds in the world use TrimTabs' research for market timing) - says:

We've never seen this before – such a huge rally, and the little guy is out.

In
other words, the stock market rally is due almost entirely to hedgies,
pension funds, banks and other institutional investors, and not every day investors.

It is even possible that the government itself has been propping up the stock market. And Bill Gross and Nouriel Roubini say that we have a Ponzi style economy.

TrimTabs
notes that small investors pulled out $14 billion net from stock mutual
funds from the beginning of last year through mid-December, on top of a
net $245 billion withdrawn in 2008.

Given that - as pointed out
by the above-linked article - individuals held 80% of the $19 trillion
in stock in U.S. companies, both private and public, at the end of
September - according to the Federal Reserve - recovery will not happen
so long as the little guys are sitting on the sidelines.

TrimTabs
notes that most of $592 billion taken out of money market mutual funds
last year has gone into bond and bond-hybrid funds instead.

No wonder David Rosenberg is saying:

  • "People have been lured into two bubbles seven years apart, and for a lot of them it's over."
  • "The bulls say if the market is up this much without retail investors, just watch when they come in, but it isn't going to happen."
  • Investors who have not been spooked or angered by the market are probably too poor to buy anyway.

 




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 17:26 | Link to Comment JimDesu
JimDesu's picture

I'm a little guy and I cleared out of equities (except GLD) in 2007, and made 8% annualized for the past two years on the junk bonds that didn't go toes-up on me.  But now I don't see <i>anything</i> I like and am sitting on cash at the moment.  What a sucky market.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 08:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 04:10 | Link to Comment JuicyTheAnimal
JuicyTheAnimal's picture

I had my income chopped by 2/3rds after being unemployed for most of 2008.  I am just starting to contribute to a 401K again this month but only the % of income that I get matched 100% by my employer.  My previous 401Ks have all been liquidated after each change of job for dental bills/ car repairs / visiting family across the country for weddings/ funerals and the like.  I assume this will happen again.  I figure I have to contribute because even after the 10% early withdrawal tax penalty I'm still up.  However the challenge is not loosing the rest of that company match before I'm laid-off and job searching again. Where the hell do you put your money in a 401K these days?  Bond funds or mutual funds are the only choices.  I've been saying for years that it's a fucking scam that to get all of your "compensation" (the match) they force you to invest in their bubbles. 

And on a side note, why is that executives can put as much of their income as they'd like into "Deferred income" accounts and earn guaranteed interest on it, pull as much of it out when ever they want with no penalty while our only means to defer taxes is the 401K shit.  Nobody ever talks about this.  I don't get it???  I want to tax defer a portion of my income and get 5% interest on it...until I need it.  I'm sick of paying those penalties. 

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 02:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 01/17/2010 - 10:14 | Link to Comment WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

I hate to say it, but your view of history, when it comes to precious metals, is somewhat myopic.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 01:59 | Link to Comment Brett in Manhattan
Brett in Manhattan's picture

"Investors who have not been spooked or angered by the market are probably too poor to buy anyway."

________

In other words, there is no little guy. Most of those in Mutual Funds rode out the crash, and are still in. Those who got killed are banking what little they have left.

And, the new blood that Wall St. counts on every few years is too indebted to the banks vis a vis credit cards, student loans, car loans et al.

In summary, Wall St. killed its cow.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 01:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 00:35 | Link to Comment Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

Since we're now trapped in a long term Japanese situation (because of the decision to forbid widespread bond haircuts), the real quandry for retail investors, and for institutional money managers, is to reconcile oneself with the idea that there is no longer any such thing as positive real returns for any major asset class. 

Chew on that for a while.  Like, twenty years.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 11:49 | Link to Comment cdskiller
cdskiller's picture

The quandry only applies to passive or overwhelmed retail investors. Institutional money and HF's will be relatively fine. They don't need us, in the short term, anymore, as long as their options are not limited. They can bet against us. They are playing globally. They are playing with high-speed trading programs in "dark pools". And these options, in case you haven't noticed, are not going to be limited by the financial regulatory reform their lobbyists are helping to write in Washington. Our active participation has been irrelevant for some time, a testament to just how much money has been made. But they have really proved that power with the rally of the last year. That rally has been a team effort, to be sure, with government and Goldman on the same page. The narrative being drilled is one of systemic construct, and this is very informative. You got Geithner and Blankfein standing in the living room of a house that has been blown down by a tornado and yelling "Everything's fine! The house is fine, just need a little joint compound."

I was walking down the street in Times Square in the summer of 2008 and this enthusiastic yahoo from Fox Business News acosted me to do a live interview with people on the street about the credit crisis and what I was doing with my money. When the camera rolled, I started to go off about the OTC derivatives market, about the house of cards collapsing, about pulling all my money out, which I had already done. Needless to say, he freaked a bit and moved to the next person in line before too much got out. 

The underpinning of faith, the foundation of the house, has been destroyed. Have you seen the bevy of commercials from banking institutions aimed directly at that faith? That's what they are afraid too many people have realized. So, a stock market rally was necessary. So was the ruthless message that NO OTHER CHOICE EXISTS. They are still drilling into our heads that for ALL of us to survive, the financial institutions and the mega-asset class must survive and profit FIRST.

If the commission looking into the economic crisis does any kind of a job, and the media covers it, things will get ugly fast. The belly of this beast is full of the entrails of little old ladies and our children's future hopes. They went after our pension and retirement funds and then shorted our future. It doesn't get any uglier than that.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 07:27 | Link to Comment BS Inc.
BS Inc.'s picture

Well, if "political connections" were an asset class, it would have positive real returns. Everything else, though, no.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 00:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 00:07 | Link to Comment Convection Fry List
Convection Fry List's picture

You said: "In other words, the stock market rally is due almost entirely to hedgies, pension funds, banks and other institutional investors, and not every day investors."

I'll offer up some different logic. My belief is the same folks that you've noted as being the buyers now were the same folks that were the sellers that caused the crash. You can sell one share and change a stock price.

One of these days you guys are gonna figure out this crash was completely manufactured.

And the little guy? He was really just siting there watching himself get screwed...

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 23:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 23:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 23:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 23:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 23:12 | Link to Comment Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

This is what freaks me out: the money is going into BOND FUNDS??????

I mean, equities are of course an insane hellride of squid perforations and manipulated quant jerking, but BOND FUNDS??????

Can someone at ZH please explain to the so-called 'world out there' that going into bond funds in a low rate environment is like unzipping your pants in front of a buzzsaw?

Holy crap.

Note that the one sane investment other than gold and money markets (a nose-holder yes but the 'safest' place for retail 401k to be) is actual, honest to God bond certificates, held in paper to maturity for the coupon yield only.  That is a real corporate bond, say at 5%.  Try to buy one.  Go ahead, I dare you! 

Here's a little hint, Chuckles: You can't.  Not allowed for 'the little guy'.

Stay the fuck away from bond funds.  Jesesmaryandjoseph.  Seriously.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 23:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 21:40 | Link to Comment RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

Last time so many retail investors were "out", this is what happened....

They didn't start getting in until 1999.

 

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 02:48 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 02:23 | Link to Comment No More Bubbles
No More Bubbles's picture

RT,

WTF are you talking about?  That is pure bunk.

 

Lots of new money was pouring into the market from 1995 to 1998.  Many people got spooked out in the fall of 97 and again in the fall of 98, but the "buy the dip" mentality was becoming more & more ingrained and helped result in the massive speculative blowoff we experienced in late 99 to early 2000.

A marginal group of newbies entered the market in 1999 when it kept going up, but to say that's when all the "little guys" got in is absurd. They were already in......

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 22:59 | Link to Comment BoeingSpaceliner797
BoeingSpaceliner797's picture

RT,

I certainly mean no offense.  However, I was working at Schwab during the period covered by this chart.  Schwab underwent absolutely explosive growth during this period, largely through their retail operations.  So, my experience is causing a disconnect with your statement above the chart.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 23:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 21:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 21:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 21:08 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

I've been debating this issue with knowledgeable friends.  I think it is not as simple as it might seem.

Reasons to get OUT:

insane p/e ratio

incredible ratio of insider selling over buying

real economy is clearly in bad shape and not improving

market seems to be heavily manipulated by PPT, TBTF banks, etc.

Hesitations:

if all the little guys get out, a handful of large investors will end up owning everything.  Who knows that you'll be able to get back in (assuming you would want to, of course).

High inflation to hyperinflation seems very likely - stocks are likely to be far better than cash/bonds in that scenario.  (Do you really want to be 100% in gold?)

Precious metals and commodities could be in a bubble too (I don't personally think that gold is, however)

Even if the supposed recovery right now is fake, what's to say that we don't transition to a genuine recovery 3-10 years from now, without an intervening market drop (perhaps due to continued, effective manipulation of the whole market) and perhaps stocks will actually be a good choice on a longer term basis, even from today.

I hope to hear some interesting comments in reply.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 12:48 | Link to Comment cdskiller
cdskiller's picture

Here's what I would say about the recovery. At its peak last year, the credit default swaps market stood at $60 trillion. It is now around $40 trillion. Over 30% lower. That's quite a drop.

On the other hand, that market barely existed prior to 2004. What's the % rise when something goes from nothing to 40 trillion? And 50% of those contracts reach maturity in 1-5 years. What that means is that big investors are still betting on a massive scale, over the counter, in private, that we are only 1/3 of the way through the credit default crisis. That's why Obama and legislators are being told they can't regulate the CDS market yet. It's still too big and dangerous.

Smoke 'em , if you got 'em. Or, as Blankein might say, "Smoke on this. I'm doing God's work."

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 22:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 21:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 20:17 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

2 gigantic, retirement-fund-robbing bubbles in 7 years, combined with a stratospheric P/E ratios and microscopic dividend yields would tend to make people a bit hesitant.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 05:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 20:13 | Link to Comment xamax
xamax's picture

The market ? which market , since we know now that from auto sales to christmas sales and of course the stock market, the us government is controlling everything. And don't worry, the time will come when the mainsream idiots will explain you that stocks deserve a p/e of 50 and at 30 p/e, it's a bargain. Expect s&p to rise to 1400 before the ponzi scheme blows up !    

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 19:54 | Link to Comment Gimp
Gimp's picture

The TV pump and dump sales folks are talking up bank stocks as if they are about to double. I wish I could run my business and not include ALL my liabilities like the financials are doing so their balance sheets look better thanever. The U.S. used to have an accounting system that was the envy of the world now it is just a joke!

 

 

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 19:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 01:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 19:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 00:55 | Link to Comment Silver-Is-Better
Silver-Is-Better's picture

The day JP will be forced to cover will indeed be a super day.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 19:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 19:20 | Link to Comment TJW
TJW's picture

My cash is in my mattress. The gold and silver I put into a chest and buried deep in the Colorado wilderness. Now if I can only find that damn map...

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 18:53 | Link to Comment RoastingBankers
RoastingBankers's picture

sideline money

lmfao

cnbc is for the retards, i mean bulltards

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 18:50 | Link to Comment I need more cowbell
I need more cowbell's picture

"The little guy is out"??

 Au contraire, Little Benny, that wee fraction of a man, is all in ,baby, all in.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 18:53 | Link to Comment SteveNYC
SteveNYC's picture

ROTFFL!! Gold.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 21:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 18:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 19:58 | Link to Comment jbar
jbar's picture

+100

Millions are still contributing through the work place. I don't get it.

I've been out since August 08.

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 18:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 20:17 | Link to Comment Anonymouse
Anonymouse's picture

Perhaps this is why (I had to hunt around, but finally found some figures at Seekingalpha

http://seekingalpha.com/article/181553-december-chain-store-sales-the-go...

Granted, these are versus 2007, not 2008.

December 2009 SSS vs December 2007:

Neiman Marcus (NMG) -24% Saks (SKS) -12% Abercrombie & Fitch -38% Aeropostale 23% Gap (GPS) -12% The Limited -12% Dillard -12% J.C. Penney -12% Macy's (M) -3% Target (TGT) -2% BJs ex fuel (BJ) 9% Costco (US ex fuel) (COST) 6% TJX 8%
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 20:21 | Link to Comment Anonymouse
Anonymouse's picture

Here's some overall info from ICSC http://www.icsc.org/homepage/research_article.php?id=87

"Jan 7: December U.S. Chain-Store Sales Rise 2.8% to Lift Holiday Season Sales

December Sales Up 2.8%--Season Up 1.8%

December 2009 U.S. comparable-store sales spurted by a near-expected 2.8% compared with the same month of 2008, based on a tally of 33 retail-chain stores compiled by the International Council of Shopping Centers. The two-month (November-December) traditional holiday season posted a gain of 1.8% compared with a hefty record 5.6% drop in 2008. The 2009 holiday season pace was the strongest since 2006 (the last non-recession holiday season) when sales grew by a hefty 4.4%."

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 03:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 01/11/2010 - 21:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!