• Reggie Middleton
    03/19/2010 - 10:03
    As I warned in my Pan-European Sovereign Debt Crisis series and amid a depression, this Eastern European government has collapsed. Western European countries (and their banks) have material claims within this country, and when combined with pressure from the PIIGS, may be the ones that set off the financial/economic contagion daisy chain. It is difficult to determine who sets it off, which is why it is best to attempt to determine the path of the contagion instead...
  • Leo Kolivakis
    03/19/2010 - 07:34
    A recent joint poll by Responsible-Investor.com, the Network for Sustainable Financial Markets and AQ Research, showed more than 90% of investment professionals believe moral hazard has increased. And yet, global pension funds and wealth funds who manage trillions of dollars have not taken the lead to push for financial reforms. Why do they acquiesce, and not push for meaningful post-crisis reforms?
  • Econophile
    03/19/2010 - 00:48
    The fact that Google will not kowtow to Bejing and will walk away from the market of greatest potential is to me a commendable act. This is a companion piece to my series, "China's Fragile Economy, Its Housing Bubble, and What It Means To Us." China is not a liberal country, by far.

What Inflation?

naufalsanaullah's picture




Sure, stocks are rising and the dollar is tanking. But we don't have inflation. Yet.

Yes, the Fed's balance sheet has ballooned to the joke it is today, holding more than $2.1 trillion in assets. But what about the liabilities soaking up these assets?

Currency in circulation is only up 9.7% YoY, while the assets are up 80.5% in the same period.

So if all of this printed money is being used by the Fed to purchase toxic assets, where is it going?

Excess reserves, of course. Counting for $833 billion of the Fed's liabilities, the reserve balance with the fed has skyrocketed almost 9000% YoY. Excess reserves, balances not used to satisfy reserve requirements, total $733 billion, up over 38,000%!

Excess Reserves of Depository Institutions

The Fed pays interest on these reserves, and with an interest rate (return on capital) comes opportunity cost. Banks hoard the capital in their reserves, collecting a risk-free rate of return, instead of lending it out into the economy. But what happens as more loan losses occur and consumer spending grinds to a halt? The Fed will lower (or get rid of) this interest on reserves.

And that is when the excess liquidity synthesized by the Fed, the printed money, comes rushing in and inflates goods prices.

Right now, we have a case of a $2.7 trillion move in equity market capitalizations corresponding with an only $400 billion decline in money market funds. QE funneled through fractional reserve leverage into bank reserves is where the bank algos get the buying power to make up the difference (that, and AIG counterparty bailout funds). But this is purely liquidity. And with the forward-pulled demand thesis attempted three times before, the US govt at the debt wall, and no consumer credit in sight, the market is going to go right back down.

To get an inflationary bull market, the printed money/excess liquidity can't be exclusive to equities. Equities are where the QE's "inflation" has been seen of late, but it is little more than a Ponzi scheme, as the funds haven't entered the real economy (as the equity prices would suggest), and until excess reserves are unsequestered, there is no inflation, there is no nominal growth, and there is no bull market (however fallacious and inflationary to begin with).

The excess reserves will be released when the Fed/Tsy have no more bailouts/stimuli on their agenda and everything they wanted has been fully authorized and set into action. Until then, it will be a game of letting the market correct itself (ie Paulson allowing Lehman BK to crash stocks last year), spending months using that as political capital to issue unprecedented deficit spending/bailouts, fend off Congress/taxpayers as the panic mode wears off and they realize what they allowed via ultimatum/MAD, and crash the markets again when you run out of ammo to raise new political capital. And with Barney Frank stating HR 1207 will pass this October (something that cannot be allowed if the Fed/Tsy want to continue their shenanigans), the fall equity selloff I've been calling for seems all the more likely.

POMOs end September 2, until further notice and the Clearinghouse Association has already begun the MAD talk again...

4.866665
Your rating: None Average: 4.9 (15 votes)



by ghostfaceinvestah
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 19:09
#52440

Good thesis, though I think the timing may be off, the Fed still needs to pump liquidity into MBS to keep that market solid.  Though I admit I could be wrong - the Fed may even stop the MBS buying early, and let the market tank, if threatened.  It is like trying to predict the actions of a caged animal.

Don't forget too the external forces at work - the FCBs are getting cash for their agency clunkers, and are turning that cash into hard assets, which also puts upward pressure on prices.  They've been trying to talk down the markets so they can trickle in the commodities and get lower prices, but if the xs-reserve money comes flooding in, it will up the urgency of the FCBs to get rid of their own dollars, turning into a vicious cycle of dollar unloading.

This could get real ugly real fast.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 19:38
#52468

i believe that the fcbs are ploughing their
cash for mbs into treasuries...if they are not
then that is an inflationary leak...

the chinese are trying to shift into commodoities
but that process will take a while...and given
large losses they have suffered in commodity trading
i am not sure to what extent they are willing
continue there....

by handsfree
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 10:05
#52829

That might help to explain the run-up in these insolvent companies.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 19:38
#52467

The Fed banks are paying 0.25% on "required and excess reserves" (as of the Dec08 FOMC statement).

6month UST notes yield 0.24%.

Didn't Sweden push thier reserve rate negative? ie. force member banks to loan out excess by charging interest on the reserves.

The way all dollar denominated asset classes are getting bid up makes me think asset inflation is well along. Getting a rise in CPI will take a while.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:13
#52503

Swiss Franc time for me. Dollar gonna lose it's "superiority"

by Nolsgrad
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:14
#52507

Swiss Franc for me, USD "superiority" is over

by RobotTrader
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:16
#52509

From Spock (aka Rasputin) at Prudent Bear Chat:

"Last year at approximately this time, this Vulcan posted a number of missives describing our imminent scroomage due to the implosion of Fannie/Freddie/FHLBs.

And in fact he went so far as to infer that perhaps we actually were sliding into the depths of deflationary debt and derivatives collapse.

Below, please find a long excerpt from one of his posts on the subject. Clearly you will see that his bias at the time was toward deflation, with the caveat that if the Fed and Uncle Sugar got serious about fighting the collapse, then all bets were off.

Here is the post, made on September 29th, 2008 (posted as "Ras", and with "Spock" present-day comments following thereafter):

"...over the last three weeks we have seen the acceleration of the systemic failure of the entire planet's financial system, which includes (as excerpted from the latest "Rasipedia"):

1. Fannie Mae failed ($2.5 tril.)

2. Freddie Mac failed ($2.5 tril.)

3. FHLB system failed ($1.3 tril)

5. Merril failed ($.8 tril)

4. Lehman failed ($.7 tril)

5. AIG failed ($500 bil. in CDS)

6. Goldman Sachs effectively failed ($2 tril)

7. Morgan Stanley effectively failed ($1.5 tril)

8. WaMu failed ($300 billion)

9. Wachovia failing, which is in talks to be married off shortly

Sub Total: Approximately $12.3 trillion

But also vaporized, were virtually every:

1. Hedge fund
2. Pension fund
3. Insurance fund
4. Mutual fund
5. Money Market fund
6. Bank

...both in the U.S. and in all other major countries, worldwide.

And all of which are toppling over left-and-right.

Sub Total: Who knows? Probably trillions more


However, ALSO vaporized--and even more dangerously so were:

1. Some percentage of the $62 trillion credit default swaps market

2. Some percentage of the $650 trillion overall derivatives markets

Sub Total: Who knows? I don't even want to guess anymore.


(Ras Summary): At the risk of alienating those die-hard inflationists who insist that because a gallon of milk is near four fiatscos, we are experiencing "Weimar meets Zimbabwe", the above set of facts show that the world is rapidly falling into the abyss of deflation.

Massive, worldwide deflation, that is.

Which is consuming everything in its path, and has already swallowed the approximately five-trillion fiatscos TPTB have thrown at it and hasn't even stopped growing, much less slowing down or reversing.

Now, this doesn't mean that central banks and governments WON'T ultimately throw the "Hyperinflation Switch" and literally create another ten-to-twenty trillion fiatscos in a last-ditch attempt to mitigate the deflationary damage, but so far they have not.

It will be interesting to see how the "Infinite Fiat" provision of the latest (but perhaps NOT the last) bailout bill is funded. Here are some scenarios:

1. If the U.S. debt enablers continue to step up and buy the preponderance of the trillions of fiatscos of bonds issued to attempt to resurrect the failed financial system, then that appears to be deflationary as the U.S. might actually have to EARN their way out of the mess (assuming we don't default outright which would be too horrid to contemplate at this moment, even for me!).

2. If taxes on U.S. citizens are also raised to help pay for the bailout, then that also would be deflationary as fiatscos are vaccumed out of the wallets of the poor working proles.

4. However, if the Federal Reserve decides to monetize the bailout debt, then we MIGHT be looking at a hyperinflationary scenario as the fiatscos filter through the federal government and into the general economy. But hyperinflation horror would ONLY ensue if the U.S. populace would begin to lose faith in their fiatscos and start furiously flinging them at any and everything in order to get rid of the rapidly-diminishing-in-value currency.

(Note: according to Doug Noland's latest "Credit Bubble Bulletin", the Fed has increased its balance sheet by a whopping TWO-HUNDRED FORTY-SIX BILLION fiatscos in the last TWO WEEKS alone!--over and above all the other massive increases over the last year or so.
In addition, our foreign debt-enablers have also "taken one for the team" and increased their holdings of U.S. Treasuries/agencies to TWO-POINT-FOUR TRILLION fiatscsos, so it is clear that the "Great Convulsion Celebrity Death Match" between the forces of debt default destruction and reflation/monetization is on in full force.)

(Ras Conclusion:) At this juncture, our scroomage seems to be coming from the deflation side and not the inflation side of hell. And, despite heroic efforts on behalf of CBs and governments worldwide to pump five-trillion fiatscos into the system to fight the debt destruction, they are not yet winning the battle.

Perhaps we will see the momentum shift back toward the inflation/hyperinflation side as the funding for the bailout bill becomes more clear.

Yet, presently we are--and have been for the last year or so--clearly and unequivocally descending into the depths of deflation, despite the desperate attempts to fight it by TPTB."

Which explains why the "Flight to Money" (including the U.S. fiatsco, U.S. Treasuries AND gold) is underway.

So, "Shoot the messenger" if you wish, inflationists. but don't ignore his message."

(Spock Update): So, Spockputin HASN'T been a 100-percent-all-the-time inflationist after all, has he? Instead, he was definitely leaning toward the deflation scenario but certainly was concerned about the Fed and Uncle turning on the afterburners and again inciting the "Animal Spirits" in the sheeple.

And that is where we are today. McMansion flippers coming out of the woodwork, McAuto buyers enticed into another round of debt, and of course the much-reported-on stock market skying--all supplied by a massive flinging of fiat by central banks.

The Fed Politburo and Uncle Sugar are inciting "Animal Spirits" in all asset markets--but ESPECIALLY in the mortgage market--simply because they are the largest shareholders and bond holders of all the failed financial gamblers who previously played in this particular pen.

So, in order to protect, and even grow, their own stakes in Fannie, Freddie, FHLBs, Ginnie, AIG, Citi, BofA, and other Ponzi Participants, TPTB are providing "liquidity" for the gamblers to re-inflate these previosly destroyed positions.

The Fed is also flinging fiat toward "Algo/Igor/Robo" and allowing these monsters to pump up general equity indices, with Oman2's "Trailer Trash Six" leading the pack.

This is the most glaring example of "Circular Reference" Fascism that a Vulcan has ever witnessed.

And you can bet that the sheeple are cheering them on, and also furiously punching their "buy AIG" F12 keys in order to participate in the hoopla.

So, clearly NOTHING has changed. The same gamblers, the same Fed and Uncle Sugar, the same sheeple and the same enablers ("Options 'R' Us" type platforms) all romping around the same casino.

Heh, and people wonder why this observer constantly reminds the board that "Wash, Rinse, Repeat" and "Age of Infinite Fiat" continue unabated."



by eggy123
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:26
#52523

Holy shit that's scary. Especially scary because it's hard to argue with anything he says.

by Andy Dufresne
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 22:08
#52624

uhhh, yeah... been trying to explain this on deaf years

by dcb
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 08:16
#52785

they have to keep the shit locked up long enough to fool the americam people. this gets the capital out, then later on fed raises rates to help out dollar (if we are lucky). Although I do not believe the man who has fucked up things so much, bernake, despite what the press sas, can pull it it off.

by Shell Game
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 10:07
#52830

T.D., T.R. and Andy, this is why I'm here. You guys do better at 'keepin it real' than a south park rapper.

by AN0NYM0US
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 13:59
#52867

outstanding Robo

here's a link with same article

http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/index.php?showtopic=834541&hl=

thanks for the heads up on http://financialnewswatch.com/  great site though not too intuitive

Here is the link to their various forums

http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/

and to the BearsChat forum where the featured authors (Spock etc) post

http://forums.wallstreetexaminer.com/index.php?showforum=1

 

 

 

by waterdog
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:51
#52548

Nice and short naufalsanaullah, just like I need it.

I can't punch no hole in your post. It is not hard to withdraw the excess dollars from the money supply if it never was in the money supply.

Hey, how much of the reserve currency was exchanged by our embassies for a one year supply of currency of the country where the embassy is located?

by RobotTrader
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 22:15
#52630

Picture of deflation...

LOL....

by mannfm11
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 22:47
#52661

I contend that the liquidity wasn't liquidity at all, but a liquification of assets to restore bank capital.  By that I mean the money mentioned has already been destroyed when the capital losses of bad loans hit.  Banks don't have money, but pass credits between each other and these had already disappeared.  In any case, the Fed is acquiring assets in return for whatever their credit represents.  Those assets represent something people and entities on the outside have given up.  Banking has reached the region beyond where inflation can take place and bankruptcy is next. 

by mannfm11
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 22:49
#52663

Also, the rally is a phenomenon of the decline and is being funded by capers pulled by Bernanke and Goldman Sachs.  Remember the news is blamed for moving the market, but in reality the reason the market moves is totally made up.  The green shoots they mention are at best status quo.  Today I read that the consumer confidence numbers beat expectations, but showed a decline from the previous month.  Who are they kidding? 

by handsfree
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 10:01
#52826

I wish some of my stocks were up that much yoy

by chinaguy
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 04:34
#52756

So, in order to protect, and even grow, their own stakes in Fannie, Freddie, FHLBs, Ginnie, AIG, Citi, BofA, and other Ponzi Participants, TPTB are providing "liquidity" for the gamblers to re-inflate these previously destroyed positions.

 

That might help to explain the run-up in these insolvent companies.


by dcb
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 08:19
#52786

Aslong as fed is allowed to overpay for MBS the banks will have a place to put the capital. that will be into stocks. We the consumer a left holding the shit. America defaults, wall street happy. Maybe then the violent overhthrow can happen. until then we are just sheep

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 10:20
#52837

"America defaults, wall street happy. Maybe then the violent overhthrow can happen. until then we are just sheep"

Sorry, too late by then. Prior to the "Great Default", Marshal Law will be declared, the internet shut down, Media censored, U.S. Troops guarding banks and government buildings, and local police going house to house searching for weapons. Then it will get bloody but far from an "overthrow", more like a "Civil War".

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 08:34
#52790

From the commentary:

"But what happens as more loan losses occur and consumer spending grinds to a halt? The Fed will lower (or get rid of) this interest on reserves.

And that is when the excess liquidity synthesized by the Fed, the printed money, comes rushing in and inflates goods prices."

My take:

Why couldn't the Fed oscillate the rate to control the amount of reserves used to back new loans?

And with falling credit ratings, to whom would the new loans go?

Granted, the banks may drive commodity prices up through market speculation thereby increasing price inflation for essentials, but unless consumer credit can expand apace, the economy would simply collapse.

0.

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 10:16
#52836

"America defaults, wall street happy. Maybe then the violent overhthrow can happen. until then we are just sheep"

Sorry, too late by then. Prior to the "Great Default", Marshal Law will be declared, the internet shut down, Media censored, U.S. Troops guarding banks and government buildings, and local police going house to house searching for weapons. Then it will get bloody but far from an "overthrow", more like a "Civil War".

by aurum
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 11:24
#52855

you do not account for external forces...your thinking on inflation assumes that the us is the only country that purchases anything...also you ignore the overvalued usd...you also ignore ridiculously cheap us energy (utility prices) that most have experienced over the last 20-30 years that is very soon to change..theres plenty more to the arguement than bank reserves in limbo...and to everyone the fed and fcbs will not let deflation occur. its a bankers worst nightmare..its that easy. print print print.

by Arm
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 11:43
#52859

Agree with all except the arguement that government could try printing trillions.  

When currency is thus brazenly debased, inflation follows for a bit, but afterwards the currency simply ceases to exist.  A fiatco that is no longer accepted is no currency at all; they can print all they want, but it is then Mononpoly money. 

What shape will this new reserve currency have?  I open the floor to discussion

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 14:12
#52899

China recently became the world's largest gold market:

http://debtsofanation.blogspot.com/2009/08/debts-of-lenders-china-becomes-worlds.html

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.