This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

When JPM/HSBC Don't Like The Results, The CME Just Changes The Rules: Full Revised Silver Margin Schedule

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Here is how the CME just changed the rules just as the Fed was losing the game. Full new margin schedule attached.

Chadv10-461

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:51 | 713318 trav7777
trav7777's picture

drop gettin apocalyptic bitchez

Ag off a buck, Gold intraday -40...etc

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:52 | 713327 Walter_Sobchak
Walter_Sobchak's picture

sounds like a good time to BUY trav.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:10 | 713412 Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture

 

I hope silver stays flat for the next 3 weeks!

3 more weeks for my christmas bonus and I want to spend it all on silver :)

 

 

Today I was 5 seconds short of maxing out my cash accounts and go all in on silver rounds.

Bullions just where getting a bit to high and I expected a little drop. Glad I didn't do it.

 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:04 | 714043 erik
erik's picture

Before the SLV announcement...

"In the options market, Pete Najarian said there's been tremendous activity in the SLV

exchange-traded fund. More than 300,000 contracts changed hands in just the first few hours of trading. But with more puts being bought than calls, Najarian said investors are either hedging or speculating silver's due for a pullback after its 56 percent move to the upside this quarter."

Is it possible that somebody's got the news before the rest of us?

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:19 | 714097 TheMonetaryRed
TheMonetaryRed's picture

LOL!!!

Yeah it's just conceivable that such a thing might have happened.

I thought there might be "unintended consequences" from this "get tough" stance on JPM:

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/rico-suit-filed-against-hsbc-and-jpmorg...

P.S. - Go Dogs.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:51 | 714217 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

Is it possible that somebody's got the news before the rest of us?

 

I imagine a scenario similar to the event in February which Andrew McGuire described to the CFTC before it had in fact occurred. And yet the beat goes on...

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 22:05 | 718487 LittleAl_1
LittleAl_1's picture

This is peanuts relative to the fact ETF shares are deliverable against Comex Gold futures.

“Gold Backed” ETF’s are deliverable against Comex futures contracts. The Biggest Comex shorts are HSBC and JP Morgan, who also happen to be the custodians for the “Gold Backed” ETF’s!!!

 

The banks rumored to have the largest short positions in the gold market, JPM and HSBC, are the custodians for the two largest “gold backed” Exchange Traded Funds, SPDR Gold Shares (ticker: GLD) and IsharesCOmex Gold Trust (ticker: IAU).

 

Heres the scary part, these ETF shares are eligible for delivery for the benchmark Comex gold futures contract!!!!!!

 

Its only a matter of time this ponzi scheme blows up.  But by then it doesn’t matter if you hold GLD shares or Comex shares, they’ll both be backed by promises similar to our nations currency. 

 

Those specific people over at Comex/Nymex who pushed this through when this all falls apart, I hope aren’t forgotten when this shoe drops.

 

Posted on CME’s website,

 

The purpose of this Notice is to confirm that the Exchange would accept gold-backed exchange-traded Funds ("ETF") shares as the physical commodity component for an EFP transaction involving COMEX gold futures contracts, provided that all elements of a bona fide EFP pursuant to Exchange Rule 104.36 are satisfied.

 

http://www.cmegroup.com/tools-information/lookups/advisories/market-regulation/SER-4942.html

 

Also on CFTC website.

http://www.cftc.gov/files/submissions/rules/selfcertifications/2005/rul021805nymex001.pdf

 

I-shares Comex Gold Trust (ticker: IAU).

The assets of the Trust consist primarily of gold bullion held by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., London branch (the “Custodian”), as agent of the Trust responsible only to the Trustee.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1278680/000119312510251865/d10q.htm

 

From SPDR Gold Shares (ticker: GLD) 10Q

Gold is held by HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (the “Custodian”), on behalf of the Trust, and is valued, for financial statement purposes, at the lower of cost or market.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1222333/000095012310073211/y03680e10vq.htm

 

Little Al

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:11 | 714304 FreedomGuy
FreedomGuy's picture

Yeah, S. Debt. I was thinking the same. I just got a bunch of rounds I ordered two months ago and was debating whether to buy now before it hits the stratosphere or wait for a pullback. You can usually count on the traders to do some profit taking. Plus, if all the conspiracy theorists are right there will be some sort of market interventions where the little guys like me/us can jump in for a few more rounds, lol.

Glad I waited. Logic tells me there will be periodic pullbacks and profit taking. However, this is where I like being the long term holder hedging against economic armageddon. I don't need the very best price at any given moment. I can take delivery and put it in the safe behind my gun cabinet and barbed wire, lol. I will let the short and intermediate guys sweat out the day to day numbers.

However, if I do see the currency apolcalypse happening I will go all in with everything I can get my hands on.

While markets may have gone back and forth today, I do not see any change in Fed or government policy that makes me change my mind on metals. No one has announced a balanced budget, no more QE or the end of the currency wars.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:18 | 713459 ATG
ATG's picture

sounds like a good time to BUY trav

famous last words

Check Farrell Rules again before reloading

http://www.businessinsider.com/bob-farrells-10-investing-rules-2009-12

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:21 | 713505 SpeakerFTD
SpeakerFTD's picture

The margin change is a nice excuse, but hardly explains the whole move.

For that, look at the long bond.  Look at TLT.   If yields scream higher, PMs will get killed as they should.  

If this is the end of the bond bubble, it is probably also the end of the PM bubble.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:24 | 713524 bull-market_3.0
bull-market_3.0's picture

Why would the end of the bond bubble imply the end of the PM bubble?

If the bond bubble ends (presumably because of higher inflation) isn't that good for PMs?

Please clarify?

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:29 | 713542 SpeakerFTD
SpeakerFTD's picture

If there is catastrophic hyperinflation, PMs are good, but if interest rates climb and inflation is not severe, PMs stink, simply because they do not earn any interest (and usually have a carry cost to boot).

If the 1-yr rate is 0%, you lose nothing owning PMs.  Take it up to 5%, and they don't look so hot.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:31 | 713556 EscapeKey
EscapeKey's picture

Except, of course, that equities underperform during hyperinflation. And PMs "stink" - are you paid to post your lies here?

1-years - yes, unless the house collapses before you get your principal back. Hey COMPLETELY RISK FREE INVESTMENT, right?

 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:41 | 713589 SpeakerFTD
SpeakerFTD's picture

Did you read my post at all?  I didn't even mention equities.  I think equities are the worst investment right now.  I am actually on the King Dollar bandwagon at the moment.  My point was that, all other things being equal, with any marginal higher interest rate available on cash, a PM becomes marginally less attractive.

BTW, I do own some physical PMs, purely as insurance against a worst case scenario.  Which also makes me wonder why everybody is so upset silver is not going straight vertical.   If we were to wake up next week with $50 silver, it would not be a good thing for anybody. 

And finally, if anybody here was long PMs on margin, you got what you deserved. 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:49 | 713679 EscapeKey
EscapeKey's picture

Fair enough. Apologies, I was a bit quick off the mark.

Nah, I've only got physical, I don't touch anything but. For my part, I'm upset with regards to Silver, because it's so obvious what they're doing. There are plenty of other commodities rising at faster rates but Silver, but they don't strike down on those, despite them being essential for life. You do the math.

I wouldn't put a penny into the US Dollar or USD-denominated debt. I think the USD is living on borrowed time, and every day I get out of bed wondering who those idiots are who still buy treasuries, when the status quo of the US is so obviously completely unsustainable. The only - ONLY - reason for people still buying them is in the hope of finding a greater fool down the line - i.e. practically the definition of a ponzi scheme.

 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:00 | 713749 JonNadler
JonNadler's picture

How do you guys like my new handle. He will replace Jonny as Obama2012 replaced JW

 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:00 | 714002 bull-market_3.0
bull-market_3.0's picture

Thanks for the explanation SpeakerFTD. 

On a similiar note, how do other commodities perform in this situation? I assume agricultural would rise with inflation whether it is hyper or regular, correct?

How about energies? Does it also rise with hyper/regular inflaton? And for what reasons?

Can you explain the effect on metals such as copper as well?

Really Appreciate it if you can.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 23:17 | 714800 SpeakerFTD
SpeakerFTD's picture

If interest rates rise significantly, if the bond bubble has popped and we are looking at a multiyear trend higher in interest rates, commodities will get absolutely crushed across the board.   There will be supply/demand issues as always, and if Peak Oil is real that will have a supportive effect on some commodities, but in general, a move higher in interest rates now equals forced-upon austerity, and it will crush both genuine demand and any speculative juices currently supporting prices.

Absent Fed interference, we are in a naturally deflationary environment as we need to delever decades of malinvestment.  Fed interference has so thoroughly screwed up normal market signals, that I think we may be witnessing a theoretically "impossible" scenario, such as stagflation was once imagined to be.  In this scenario, long-term rates rise over a long period of time even as deflation bites deeper.   The driver for higher rates would be solvency concerns and a general lack of trust in any other market player, including the U.S. government   If that happens, you have a massive Depression over several years, and assuming war does not emerge as a result, the man with actual cash in hand at the end of it is able to buy assets at fire sale prices from people who need to trade those assets for the necessities of life.

 I realized I will be wildly junked for such an unorthodox theory, but my point is that extent of Fed interference with the market is such that the unwinding process is bound to create previously unthinkable market behaviors.

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 00:01 | 714880 Kidrobot
Kidrobot's picture

Just currious, but is it even possible for interest rates to rise?   I mean, its not like we are going to magically stop operating off new debt, and with higher rates..wont they just have to print more anyways to service it?  And if so, ... whats the difference between that outcome and what we have now...where PM's are soaring.

I still believe it comes to faith in the system, and I have none.  So, I'll keep stacking.

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 03:21 | 715125 FreedomGuy
FreedomGuy's picture

There is not only a deleveraging of malinvestment plus the fraud but a general freeze or destruction through government policy wrecking the economy and incomes, as well.

The other deleveraging that needs to be done is the price of money itself. The entire Western and even much of the Middle Eastern world has serious debt problems. Ergo, it seems that the price of money should have been going up dramatically the last few years, not down. As wealth has been destroyed, debt has not completely followed, particularly at the government level. However, with the Fed and central banks intervening there is an artificially low price to money itself. If money could be priced right it seems to me a lot would come off the sidelines and even out of bonds where its been parked more to avoid loss than achieve gain. This of course would be bad for the USA, the world's largest debtor.

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 04:32 | 715362 EscapeKey
EscapeKey's picture

Raising rates? There's zero chance of that happening, as it would mean instant bankruptcy of millions of homeowners, who in turn would take all the banks with them.

As for the "natural deflationary environment" - well, we WOULD be, if only it wasn't for the Fed effectively promising to print enough to backstop all the toxic waste (pay attention to the extremely open-ended promises of the QE2 statement). How any semi-rational person can't see how this will feed into inflation is beyond me.

As I said it in my previous response - the only reason for anyone to buy US Treasury debt is in the expectation of locating a greater fool down the line (which in today's environment usually IS the Fed). I.e. it's a ponzi scheme. The US is effectively insolvent; it's a termite ridden house about to collapse. There is no way her debts will be honoured in a fair manner.

And once the US Dollar Index drops, ignoring liquidity concerns, whether you're in cash of bonds make very little difference - they will both drop in terms of purchasing power.

Anyway, Gold up $10 to $1,407 and Silver back up to $27.85.

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 01:10 | 714980 LowProfile
LowProfile's picture

Equities get hammmered, commodities do OK, PMs do well (they do well in inflation or deflation, poorly under stable low inflation).

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:24 | 713868 functionform
functionform's picture

Excellent explanation Speaker, it's been a while since I've actually learned something from the ZH comments.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:31 | 713899 Calculated_Risk
Calculated_Risk's picture

If interest rates climb...

 the debt becomes unserviceable.

 people save more.

 Uncle ben wants neither of these.

 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:08 | 714060 ATM
ATM's picture

Exactly. Rates cannot go up and will not be allowed to go up until Uncle Ben cannot keep theGenie in the bottle any longer. That's the whole point of the QEs - drive rates down by buying all the debt you can at any price because if rates go up all hell is going to break loose.

Bermonkey will print print print until everything that is real is unobtainable because no one will trade them for paper money. Why would they when paper money has no value because it can and is created by the hundreds of billions (and soon to be trillions) at the flip of a switch.

Ben has to have rates low, and just as the Fed did for over a decade in the 40s and into the 50s they will keep rates low. 10yr at 2% was the norm and I expect we will see that for the next 5-7 years or longer.

When the lights go on though, the rates will explode and inflation/hyper inflation is right behind. All that money will come pouring out of every nook and cranny and try to buy anything at any price.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:12 | 714308 Max Hunter
Max Hunter's picture

yeah.. I agree.. but 10yr at 2.63 today... Will the markets eventually have a say in rates?.  Can the fed buy 100% of all sovereign debt? What about other bonds?..

There is no way out of this.. They can take silver back down to 20 and I wouldn't even flinch... Point is, we are phucked..  The only thing that will fix this is a collapse and reset..

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:31 | 714370 QQQBall
QQQBall's picture

"When debt becomes unservicable", In the short run higher rates increases the holding cost of metals, but ultimately when DS rises, its gonna crush the currency -

 

See Grease ;)

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:23 | 714118 Sabremesh
Sabremesh's picture

Your argument is logical, but your premise that interests rates are going up and inflation isn't is completely delusional on both counts. 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:31 | 714153 DarkMath
DarkMath's picture

If rates go to %5 The United State Treasury will spontaneously combust:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZrqC5LL_oo

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 21:52 | 714619 Rick64
Rick64's picture

Interest rates climb? Can't see that happening anytime soon.

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 04:15 | 715293 Pondmaster
Pondmaster's picture

5% !!!! Yeah , in a decade maybe. Are you smoking some of Ben's stash?   

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:53 | 713703 Millivanilli
Millivanilli's picture

Fucking moron.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:50 | 713982 Al Gorerhythm
Al Gorerhythm's picture

This move is the trademark strategy used by these big banks and their cronies at CME. They all piss in the same pot.

Their MO is dictated by Heavy losses on naked shorts. Actions that they can take can be one of three that I have experienced.

1.a) Banks remove their buy bids off the board, leaving a skeleton crew of legitimate long bidders (making offers to buy).

b) Banks issue enough naked short offers to fill every bid on the board. Filling ever lower bid makes the price move lower, triggering stops. The momentum is then self-fulfilling.

c) When momentum slows, jump in on the buy side before everyone else and buy back your shorts at profit, ripping off the longs who are bailing at a loss.

2) a. Get your buddies at the CME to raise margin requirements, enticing long players to offload contracts due to higher carrying costs.

b. Get your buddies at the CME to implement the rule change at end of trading day when most day traders and desk jockeys have turned their console off and have gone to the local bar to brag about their long winnings. This momentum will carry over into the after hours market when there is recognized light trading. Helps the momentum with fewer naked shorts needed to keep the price falling.

c. Weak hands dump contracts into hands of short dealers, who are buying back their losing positions. Guaranteed light volume price move. 

3.) a. Force Majeure. Get your buddies to tell the longs that there is no way that you can deliver on your naked promise. The CME lets the shorts off with a slap on the wrist and severe frowning.

b. To the longs the CME will say; "Go fuck yourself".

c. That is their next play.

Buy physical with both hands. Play their paper games on the long side, as of NOW, with mackerel-assed, tight stops.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:54 | 714233 technovelist
technovelist's picture

Yes, just like what happened in the 1970's, where interest rates and gold both went WAY up.

Retard.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:59 | 714466 realitybiter
realitybiter's picture

Interest rates climbed throughtout the 70's, ineffectively chasing inflation.  And gold rose right along with it.  Bonds will fall, gold will rise, stocks will go sideways to down.  We can never afford to take rates where they should go, hence always behind inflation.  Interest payments on debt is already 12 % of gdp or some silly high figure.  Imagine what it will be when we have to pay fair rates.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 22:59 | 714773 SpeakerFTD
SpeakerFTD's picture

To be clear, I am a long-term PM bull and will always have some in my portfolio.  But in the short-term, we could correct very hard from here, especially if the Fed cannot keep a lid on the long end of yield curve.  Personally, I don't think they will.   They will fail like they have always failed over the last decade.  

If they fight hard enough, the Fed could potentially succeed in absolutely destroying the dollar as a functioning global currency, but I think/wish/hope they are not that suicidally stupid, as anyone who is very long PMs will look quite wealthy compared to their neighbors, but will have to protect that wealth in a completely dysfunctional, potentially violent, banana-republicesque society.  Not a good result in my book.

More likely, I think/hope, the Fed will blink, the long end of the yield curve will rise, potentially very quickly, and the dollar will soar, even as the interest rate environment will force us into a prolonged period of deflationary austerity.  This scenario is not bullish PMs, although if the behavior of the Yen over the last decade is any indication, it might be very bullish the dollar.

I don't know what the Fed is going to do, and neither does anyone else, so making big bets on the politics of the Fed strikes me as foolhardy.

In any case, I guess my point is that I view PMs as a purely defensive play.  Anyone who is trying to get rich off PMs through speculation deserves whatever losses they take.  PMs are true money, true long-term stores of value, and trying to game them like other trading vehicles is contrary to the whole reason one should value PMs in the first place.   Having PMs go parabolic might feel good at the moment, but it spells an enormous amount of systematic, society-wide trouble in the future, certainly more trouble than any paper gains are worth.  You should own some physical PMs, have them locked away someplace safe, and hope to God that they appreciate in a slow and boring manner and you get to pass them on to your kids in a world as relatively normal as our current one.

Incidentally, on a technical note, am I the only who noticed silver ran smack into a trendline going back over a decade?   If you believe in trendlines, it suggests that there might be lot more downside ahead than anyone on here seems to appreciate.

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 03:29 | 715141 FreedomGuy
FreedomGuy's picture

I am actually with you that a parabolic move upwards in silver is NOT a good thing, even with a PM bug like me. It would signal either a panic or an abdication of some sort.

Where I would be cautious is how much interest rates would have to rise to hurt PM's. In the early 80's Volcker had to get it up to about 21% before PM's calmed down and established a new lower normal. It was in the midst of a renewed and growing economy, too, not the crap we have, now. Interest rates like the early 80's bankrupts the USA debt service in a short period of time. Interest rates themselves can signal a loss of confidence in the currency a.k.a. banana republic. Try to buy any PM with Zimbabwe paper. Their interest rates should be super attractive!

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 04:42 | 715360 Al Gorerhythm
Al Gorerhythm's picture

The Fed is turning Japanese. They are stuck in a liquidity trap and cannot raise interest rates for fear of collapsing the whole shebang. Not gonna happen. PMs to rise for a long time.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:31 | 713898 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

margin requirement = big guns for manipulators.  Silver now down a paltry eighty cents. 

HAHAHAHAHAHA fucking morons.  It looked like a buying op to everyone.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:53 | 714231 BRAVO 7
BRAVO 7's picture

these house dice keep coming up snake eyes.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 21:51 | 714617 Yits and the Yimrum
Yits and the Yimrum's picture

the LBMA and the COMEX are probably just a fraction OTC metals derivatives, and that is why you can't bust them

I would not be betting the farm on metals on futures markets under any circumstances

if you can trade on a small scale, and plow the profits in bullion, that would be fine; but I would buy bullion first and then speculate a little

the shorts are getting toasted, but they are the big banks, and they have large gains in trading to offset these losses

if silver blows thru 30 on the way to 40, them maybe the shorts are in trouble

 

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 08:14 | 715797 Eric Cartman
Eric Cartman's picture

GET A FUCKING JOB YOU DUMB ASS MOTHER FUCKER!

When Tyler posts a new story you're less than a minute behind him to say something stupid and then go away so you can sit and wait to give a quick one liner again once a new post makes ZeroHedge. You're pathetic. You're a fool, and worst of all, you are a disgrace to ZH. Please fuck off and go dig a road or something - whatever it takes to get your 40+ year old ass off his mom's computer and doing something productive. You're such a worthless fool I don't have the time to list how stupid you are BECAUSE I HAVE TO GO TO WORK! 

Just go away!

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:53 | 713333 Bill Lumbergh
Bill Lumbergh's picture

One way around this is not to use margin...not certain what percent of players use but given the 2008 collapse I assume that amount may be quite substantial.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:57 | 713354 ZeroPower
ZeroPower's picture

Show me a desk that doesn't use margin and ill show you...

Ummm.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:37 | 713588 Jean Valjean
Jean Valjean's picture

My desk.

It's rather small.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:17 | 713839 tmosley
tmosley's picture

My desk too.  Along with everyone else who holds physical.

I expected something like this would happen at some point, where paper markets would fail, and eventually approach $0, while physical was either unavailable, or took on sky-high premiums.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:37 | 714170 AUD
AUD's picture

Except paper markets haven't failed, I only follow COMEX gold but spreads are in a 'healthy' contango. In inverted commas since my data only goes back 18 months, I don't know what spreads have been historically.

There's no shortage of bids for paper gold right out to Dec 2014. Some odd movements in open interest in the last couple of months though.

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 08:15 | 715799 Eric Cartman
Eric Cartman's picture

So is mine. 2 Monitor but it's glass, so I think I kinda kick ass!

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 08:28 | 715807 ZeroPower
ZeroPower's picture

A 'desk' managing < $10MM is no kind of desk.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:56 | 713349 TheGreatPonzi
TheGreatPonzi's picture

good troll

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:58 | 713364 homersimpson
homersimpson's picture

I don't invest in silver but you simply sound like a dick.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:04 | 713400 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

I don't "invest" in it either.  I just buy it.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:14 | 713463 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Nah, he's just a little prick.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:03 | 713398 Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

Not only are you a troll, you're a bad liar.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:14 | 713466 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

LOL

But....but.....but he said it on the Internet.

And everyone knows that you can believe everything you read on the Internet. So he can't possibly be lying.

Can he? OMG, my world crumbles. :>)

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:18 | 713485 Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture

You are shorting Ag?!

IDIOT!!

This was just a small putback! You'll never make money on it!

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:48 | 713974 Bigger Dickus
Bigger Dickus's picture

That walking toats really aggravates me.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:25 | 713528 downrodeo
downrodeo's picture

what an odd sense of humor you have...

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:50 | 713978 Bigger Dickus
Bigger Dickus's picture

It's called sarcasm.

OMG double sarcasm

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:54 | 713339 flaunt
flaunt's picture

Only silver?  They didn't even try to make it look innocent by including other "products." 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:57 | 713357 Tense INDIAN
Tense INDIAN's picture

THEY SIMPLY DONT CARE ANYMORE....what r u going to do about it

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:02 | 713385 EscapeKey
EscapeKey's picture

What, you mean like Soybeans, Cotton, Oats and Sugar, which all see much faster price increases than Silver?

Why would they? After all, the only people who will suffer from those increases are peasants.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:04 | 713397 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Right Escapekey exactly.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:54 | 713340 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

Hey look on the bright side. DXY up nearly 1%.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:57 | 713353 ExploitTheMarket
ExploitTheMarket's picture

The new POMO schedule get released tomorrow, so they needed some (slight) breathing room on the USD....

POMO: Resistance is futile.... After today equities continue the melt-up.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:55 | 713343 FunkyMonkeyBoy
FunkyMonkeyBoy's picture

Just buy the physical, put it in your safe, get it out every so often to enjoy how pretty it looks. Why play the 'paper silver' game?

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:48 | 713973 Huxley Ann
Huxley Ann's picture

Your point is well taken and I do have substantial amounts in silver and gold physical (Banco Azteca in Mexico is just a 10 minute drive from my house.) However, my big $$ is in my USA IRA which, unfortunately, probably will be confiscated before I can collect on it. In that account I have ONLY paper gold and silver - well known, respected, Canadian closed end funds (no ETFs,) and Au & Ag miner funds. Zero diversification. I figure no matter how high or low it goes, I can cash out, pay taxes & penalties the following year & get hundreds of ounzes of gold & thousands. Craftsmanship is cheap here so I can have a different massive PM jewelry mixture draped over my body each day of the year.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:04 | 714276 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

I can have a different massive PM jewelry mixture draped over my body each day of the year.

 

Au lei?

Ole!

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:57 | 713355 CarsRCoffins
CarsRCoffins's picture

So...crude came off 2 bucks because CME raised margin on Silver?  The Euro got slapped because it costs more money to speculate on silver?  Come on fellas, you're smarter than that...something else going on here.  And I'm not dissing silver...I own it and I'm not selling.  Just sayin', stop taking silver so personally and look at everything else

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:01 | 713381 redpill
redpill's picture

If they can do it without warning to silver, why can't they do it to any other commodity?  This was a symbolic move to scare leveraged longs of all commodities.  The Fed knows rapidly increasing commodity prices have the potential to disrupt their printing party.  Thus they want to delay the inevitable by eliminating as much of the margin speculating as they can.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:54 | 713995 Saxxon
Saxxon's picture

+1 Best interpretation yet.

And, how many times have they done this in the last ten years?  To gold, for instance?  Several.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:08 | 714291 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

Thus they want to delay the inevitable by eliminating as much of the margin speculating as they can.

 

What are the implications of this?

I would like to point out that the short side is also obligated to increase their margin requirements.

 

http://harveyorgan.blogspot.com/

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:03 | 713396 THE DORK OF CORK
THE DORK OF CORK's picture

Agreed - listening to wepollock lately who has a interesting Marxist perspective and he seems to hinting at a massive confrontation between China and US.

This shit is going to get very very nasty.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:17 | 713471 flacon
flacon's picture

Wepollock banned me from his youtube channel because I respectfully disagreed with him one time after he used expletives over someone suggesting 9/11 was an inside job. I haven't been back since - he was always on about "The Fuller Model" which he never fully explained. 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:33 | 713575 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

That guy's a douchebag anyway.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:37 | 713597 THE DORK OF CORK
THE DORK OF CORK's picture

Yes I disagree with his analysis on many levels but I agree with him that capital creation should be directed towards energy capital creation.

If the Austrians have their way we will have a balanced budget all right but we will be too busy working on some plantation to enjoy the finer things in life.

Complete rejection of Hamiltonian vertical power will make our cities uninhabitable.

As for 9/11 I know in my gut that something stinks but I cannot prove it.

Given his semitic background he may be spooked by his ethnic groups role in the financial and political turmoil and may want to try remain positive about what his culture can contribute rather then its negative speculative nature.

He may fear a expulsion not unlike what happened after the decline of Spain.

Listening to him lately he looks really concerned - there are demons ready to be unleashed here unless people can do practical things to avoid a breakdown crisis.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:17 | 713840 kinetik
kinetik's picture

Most Jews aren't Semetic but are European by decent.  The more you know...

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:27 | 714139 dkny
dkny's picture

...then what?

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:12 | 714306 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

he was always on about "The Fuller Model" which he never fully explained.

 

That's what the brush man carries in his valise.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:04 | 713403 espirit
espirit's picture

Ben's burning down the house to prove he can.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:26 | 713531 SpeakerFTD
SpeakerFTD's picture

It is interest rates, plain and simple.  The long bond got hammered today.  Went out on the lows. 

If the Fed cannot keep a lid on the back end of the curve, then all assets, except cash, should get hammered as a result.  

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:58 | 713365 the not so migh...
the not so mighty maximiza's picture

All acts of desperation, panic and fear.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:02 | 713391 JLee2027
JLee2027's picture

Yes. They are in trouble on the physical side. And they cannot blame the Hunts this time around.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:07 | 713417 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

You stole my thought.  The Hunt Bros. came to mind immediately.

Frankly, I could not care less about the CFTC move since I don't buy my silver this way, nor need any margin(s).   I'm a simple Coon who likes shiny things.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:19 | 713487 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Hey RR

I saw a few of your posse the other day on the side of the road near my house. They didn't look too well.

Were they doing recon to try and discover my hidden identity or were they just out trolling for babes and got caught in the cross fire? :>)

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:20 | 714105 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

I'm afraid that was a distant clan, CD.  No news yet from the families.  I'll keep ya posted.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:53 | 714437 Max Hunter
Max Hunter's picture

I had a run in with a raccoon years ago cleaning out a pile of trash.. Even though I had many potential weapons and he was much smaller, i was still a bit intimidated.. LOL

I eventually scared him off.. But he walked away slowly with a "you'd be fucking crazy to fuck with me" attitude... :)

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:05 | 713408 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Thats the way I see it all, desperate acts from desperate men.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 16:58 | 713367 h4rdware
h4rdware's picture

Changing the rules means somebody was getting *hurt*

As far as I can tell, Fekete is still on track and changing the rules won't work. Nothing will. I refer you to King Canute.

 

If the metals pause and turn back up, its going to be eerie silence time at the primaries...

 

Otherwise, I was waiting for a dip anyway. :-p

 

 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:00 | 713373 Bearster
Bearster's picture

This is what I keep blathering about.  If we are to have thousands of regulators writing tens of thousands of rules that force people to do, or not do, lots of things, tax certain things, etc... the Big Boys will have the resources to participate in every session and contribtute to the campaigns.  Everyone else is made into a victim.

This system is sold to the people on the grounds that it will protect them from the Big Boys.  The reality is exactly the opposite.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:08 | 713425 DB Cooper
DB Cooper's picture

true true - we are all pawns - But I don't worry about my phys gold and silver.  I don't count value up or down because I know it's worth more than their paper.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:14 | 713462 Walter_Sobchak
Walter_Sobchak's picture

the market will prevail

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:00 | 713376 bullwinkle
bullwinkle's picture

I've got some PM exposure but the way this stuff has been moving is sort of scary.

Just wondering, between last nights missile launch and the gold/silver missile launch are the Chinese flexing some muscle?

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:04 | 713404 JLee2027
JLee2027's picture

Scary?  You ain't seen nothing yet. These are only the tremors before the quake.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:01 | 713380 shushup
shushup's picture

Considering what happened to Gold and Silver today the major indexes held up very very very well. They barely went down at all by comparison. Of course this is all in anticipation of the new POMO schedule announcement. Which should be daily for the next 2 weeks to make up for today's scare.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:11 | 713409 ATG
ATG's picture

Let's see what happens before tomorrow evening when the 30% increase in margins goes into effect

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:02 | 713388 johngaltfla
johngaltfla's picture

No big deal. It does not reduce nor increase the physcial availability. They do this in every bull move and lose. It's a sign of desperation because everyone knows the most feared words at the CME and COMEX:

"I'll take delivery please."

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:07 | 713418 mohadiep
mohadiep's picture

+10

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:03 | 713395 ATG
ATG's picture

Hey it worked for Armand Hammer and the COMEX insiders against the Hunts $54 silver in 1980

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:04 | 713401 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

They key is phsyical delivery and no margin. Hell with em. 

 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:14 | 713405 Threeggg
Threeggg's picture

Trading like this in all markets scares the fuck out of my thought process and it's telling me that the SHTF (day) "is" alot closer than everyone thinks ??

Prepare for time is short !

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:07 | 713792 DonutBoy
DonutBoy's picture

great minds think alike 3-eggs

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:57 | 714454 Max Hunter
Max Hunter's picture

3g.. I'm thinking it already hit and it's being kept a secret from us... Not for long though

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:04 | 713406 msohn
msohn's picture

C'mon . . . with silver at $29 intraday, a single contract (at that point) had nearly $150,000 in value and could be controlled for $6,750 in initial margin for 21.5-to-1 leverage.

With the $2.50 drop in price and the new margin level, one can still bet the farm on silver at 15-to-1 (and silver is already making a comeback).

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:24 | 713519 kaiserhoff
kaiserhoff's picture

Agreed.  There are also silver options available on the COMEX that trade with essentially unlimited liquidity.  Plenty of ways to trade PMs if you do your homework.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:53 | 714230 Hansel
Hansel's picture

+1, I don't see too much conspiracy here.  The price of silver has shot up, so why shouldn't the required margin be higher?

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:04 | 713407 AR15AU
AR15AU's picture

Does China's sovereign wealth use margin? Doubt it.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:05 | 713410 e_goldstein
e_goldstein's picture

whaa! we're still relevant, really... see, look what we can do to your paper prices.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xz7_3n7xyDg

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:05 | 713411 lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

This announcement, along with JPM/HSBC selling more paper in the thinly traded NY access market, should be enough to convince everyone that silver is in a, er how you say Nouriel? Oh yes, she is in a bauble.

Not.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:10 | 713435 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Baubles, bitchez!  (You made me do it so all the junks are on your head.)

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:15 | 713469 lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

"Junks they are in a bauble."

-Nouriel Roubini

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:07 | 713419 uno
uno's picture

what's the lifespan on this, couple days - silver back at $30, maybe end of week.  Of course later this month they are going to do it for expiration

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:08 | 713424 Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

OK. Here's the deal.

Margin limits are raised all the time, particularly in futures where huge price moves are taking place. I get it.

This, however, stinks to high hell. 100%, clear, unadulterated panic move requested and supported by the Evil Empire and the Fed. Open Interest in silver was rising too rapidly and the silver Comex is broken and unable to meet delivery for December. The only way to suppress open interest is to raise margin requirements. Heck, I'm just surprised they didn't make the limits 100%! Wait, don't laugh. They might.

In the end, all they've done is created a less expensive entry point for our buyer(s) of size and run the price of silver all the way back to where it was 36 hours ago. Who knows, maybe it will follow through a little more but, in the end, the EE simply cannot change the fundamentals and the buyer(s) of size is/are determined to break them.

Volatility will only continue to increase as the EE gets more desperate. If you are faint of heart or easily frightened, I suggest you move to the sidelines and watch the show from afar. For those of us with true conviction, I suggest you buy all dips, including this one.

Gold will still trade at 1500 before 12/10/10. 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:11 | 713446 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

The Great Turd has spoken.  Thanks for the update!

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:25 | 713522 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

I don't know. Guys in funny hats scare the hell out of me. That and coons with shiny objects gnawing at my leg.

Is that your teeth or are you just happy to eat me? :>)

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:22 | 714117 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

You'll know the angry raccoon when you need to know. 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:13 | 713452 wiskeyrunner
wiskeyrunner's picture

They did this in crude to kill it, some congressmen spoke openly about it in 2008.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:15 | 713467 TradingJoe
TradingJoe's picture

Turd!

If this really happens, without a meaningful correction whatsoever, fuck, i'll buy you a beer in US GermanTown...TheVillage in NYC that is! Benjie's Plan gets hurt if Commodities go too high...watch out Below Bubba!

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 21:26 | 714540 Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

I'll be the guy at the end of the bar in the big, yellow hat.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:18 | 713486 Mozzer
Mozzer's picture

Turd, your my hero. Took the last 5k out of my savings and headed to the coin shop for some mercury dimes now.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:25 | 714348 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

headed to the coin shop for some mercury dimes now.


"Quick -- silver!"

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:20 | 713494 Smu the Wonderhorse
Smu the Wonderhorse's picture

Vive Turd!

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:22 | 713512 barthezz
barthezz's picture

I agree with you on many points Turd, but look at the huge volatility in the SI as well as GC market. The time of raising the requirements is unfortunate but it has to be done. This market would go otherwise asymptotic as TD saif earlier...

Look at the candle in SIZ0!!! What an engulfing pattern. Massive.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:28 | 713535 Kaiser Sousa
Kaiser Sousa's picture

I will from here refer to u as Mr. Turd out of upmost respect...thank u for explaining the increase motives and probable ramificiations b4 i had to formally request one...now, would u concur that what we witnessed today was nothing more that another purposefull naked short  orgy that had absolutley nothing to do with longs heading for the exits and more importantly substantive liquidation of physical inventories or eroding Silver fundamentals...i'll take my answer of the air if u would indulge....thanks

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:30 | 713553 Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

No, I posted something this morning that mentioned a pulling of bids. I think that's what happened. Our buyer(s) of size are persistent but not stupid. The PMs were running too far and too fast. On the first hint of a pullback, I expected them to pull their bids and let it fall, which they did. Now they have a chance to buy more under 1400 and under 27. Just leki they had hoped.

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 04:52 | 715378 EscapeKey
EscapeKey's picture

Well, that opportunity is now gone. Gold back up to $1,410.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:31 | 713543 AGoldhamster
AGoldhamster's picture

Owe you a beer or vine or nugget in vienna too, in the case you ever come here! Great guidance in this storm! As far as I can see there was good buying in HUI components towards the close. Also the snap back of the lows looking good imho. Further I guess another good opportunity for the Sprott ETFs to load the boat again.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:14 | 713824 Sec.NotSure
Sec.NotSure's picture

Cant wait to see my wife’s face when I drop another $1400 of her hard earned FRN’s on an “overpriced 1oz collector’s item”…and tell her….honey I got it on good word from a guy named turd on the internet that gold is the dig and going up up up! Thanks Turd! My check goes to silver!

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 19:54 | 714234 Pining for the ...
Pining for the Fjords's picture

It is strange, isn't it?  I find myself listening to cnbc in the morning driving to work, I hear some PM's news and all I can think is "I wonder what Turd will say about this?"

And then, in the tenth year of the new century, there appeared a sooth sayer renowned through the land. And he dids't shew the people the way, and it was good. And he was revered by the name...

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:25 | 713871 breezer1
breezer1's picture

agree %100...

ed steers on silver...

file:///Users/doug/Desktop/Ed Steers $60 silver..html

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:32 | 713906 ReallySparky
ReallySparky's picture

Thanks Turd.  Appreciate your comments.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:44 | 713962 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Turd as always love to see your take on it.  All out of ammo right now, waiting for the next paycheck to come in...but man it's starting to get rougher to put the scratch together to buy.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 20:02 | 714268 technovelist
technovelist's picture

Heck, I'm just surprised they didn't make the limits 100%! Wait, don't laugh. They might.

They can make them more than 100%, and have done so in the past. With platinum, if I recall correctly.

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 03:59 | 715192 ThreeTrees
ThreeTrees's picture

+1 Contributor Priviledges

 

Give this man a column, somebody, please.  Turd, to say nothing of your calls, your concise analysis and thorough reason are teachers.  Reading your shit gives the impression of puzzle pieces falling into place.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:08 | 713426 Bartanist
Bartanist's picture

Just inflation. The dollar does not buy as much as it did before ... or have you not heard?

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:08 | 713430 Gubbmint Cheese
Gubbmint Cheese's picture

Turd you magnificent bastard.. where are you?

(thank god a captcha question I can answer in my head..)

 

 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:09 | 713432 jmac2013
jmac2013's picture

My intuition is that this is tremendously bullish for silver.  "They" are scared of the run in PMs and are now visibly showing their fear.  It's like blood in the water for those who want to feed on the dead stinky fiat fish.

I do hope there is a correction though, so I can buy in for more. 

 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:30 | 713895 dehdhed
dehdhed's picture

yup, agreed.   i think this is foreshadowing a market signal failure.  all they did was win a small battle today while negotiating terms of surrender.

after all the exuberance i've seen lately, i was getting worried.  now, after this, i couldn't be more sure ...

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:10 | 713437 wiskeyrunner
wiskeyrunner's picture

The stock index futures will rise 0.40% tonight. The Dow Mini futures will move up to 11368 by 3:00am cst, they always rise after a red close.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:10 | 713442 Hannibal
Hannibal's picture

A silver short rescue (bailout) for JPM and HSBC or

Comex can't deliver allocated physical. Either way it doesn't

pass any smell test. 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:11 | 713447 DB Cooper
DB Cooper's picture

Reminds me of the headfake right before the QE2 announcement last week - maybe something else is coming (besides the POMO schedule announcement) that they need to beatdown PM's for to put a little scare in these markets (still not lower than 2-3 days ago though).

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:39 | 713935 dehdhed
dehdhed's picture

as of now it's right where it was yesterday at 11am

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:12 | 713450 caconhma
caconhma's picture

It is right. They can stick all these paper-silver and paper-gold into their ass. Nobody buys physical gold or silver on margin.

The good news they do not control the world any more. They are desperate and they are stupid.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:20 | 713501 TheGreatPonzi
TheGreatPonzi's picture

The masters of the world never accept a defeat easily. They have only used a fraction of their real power yet.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:12 | 713451 godfader
godfader's picture

If the tinfoil hats are correct this margin increase would be like pouring gasoline on the fire of the shorts. So why did Silver round trip 10% today, closing at the lows? Doesn't make sense if there was a huge "naked" short COMEX position now would it?

 

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 17:17 | 713478 Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden's picture

margin requirements and position limits just happen to be two slightly, and completely, different topics. Look into it, and while at it, please check how big JPM and HSBC's margin allotment is, then get back to us.

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 18:23 | 713853 TheMonetaryRed
TheMonetaryRed's picture

Still, it's not entirely explained in your post how this increase in margin requirement helps JPM and HSBC.

If higher margin slows movement, it doesn't change the direction, surely.

This looks to me more like one of those "unintended consequences" of pressure on JPM for its behavior in the silver market.

I think it might even turn bearish for gold, although I'm certainly still expecting $1700, myself.

Wed, 11/10/2010 - 04:14 | 715292 ThreeTrees
ThreeTrees's picture

It shifts the demand curve to the left.  Higher opportunity cost makes entry less appealing.

 

(btw, this isn't one of those posts where I take on a snarky, know-it-all tone and quote Mises at you like Scripture.  I'm actually looking for somebody to elaborate on or refute my logic.)

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!