You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Who is going to buy gold?

Vitaliy Katsenelson's picture




This is the first in a series of what some may consider as “gold bashing” articles. I am not short gold in any shape or form. I have no axe to grind against gold bugs. I am simply presenting the other side of the argument in response to what I deem to be dishonest, gold-pimping commercials (e.g., “If gold prices went up to $5,000 this pile of gold would be worth $300,000”) that we are subjected to all day long on TV. I may be wrong, but I am honest.

Here is a trivia question for you: what country is the seventh largest holder of gold, ahead of China, Japan, and Switzerland? Well, it was a trick question: the seventh largest holder of gold is not a country, it is an exchange-traded fund, GLD. Yes, a fund that is not even five years old is the seventh largest holder of physical gold in the whole world, even ahead of mighty China.

When investors buy GLD, GLD in turn has to go out and buy gold, driving up the price. This raises a little question: who will be buying this gold from GLD when investors decide to sell it? Gold is one of those weird assets where nobody knows what it is really worth. You cannot run discounted cash-flow analysis to value it – it has no cash flows. It is an asset where perception and reality are deeply intertwined.

Investors buying the gold ETF (GLD) are influencing the price of gold, which is fair for the most part, as otherwise they’d be buying the real thing. The ease of buying GLD creates a higher, artificial demand – but GLD is still fair game.

The violent selloff in GLD will be caused by factors that are hard to predict today (e.g., hedge-fund liquidations) but that will drive the price of gold down dramatically unless a real buyer steps in (like another government sick of owning the US debt, for instance), and the gold price could get cut in half overnight. Suddenly, perception of not being a store of value will create the reality of gold not being a store of value. The gold game will be over.

Vitaliy N. Katsenelson, CFA, is a portfolio manager/director of research at Investment Management Associates in Denver, Colo.  He is the author of "Active Value Investing: Making Money in Range-Bound Markets" (Wiley 2007).  To receive Vitaliy's future articles by email, click here.




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 11/10/2010 - 06:24 | Link to Comment cheap uggs for sale
cheap uggs for sale's picture

It’s a interesting news,i like it.Additionally,wellcome to my website prettyboots.org ,here are so many UGGS On Sale such as:UGG Elsey wedge|UGG Elsey wedge black|UGG Elsey wedge chestnut|UGG Elsey wedge espresso|UGG Langley|UGG Langley black|UGG Langley chestnut|UGG Lo Pro Button|UGG Lo Pro Button black|UGG Lo Pro Button blue|UGG Lo Pro Button cream|UGG Mayfaire|UGG Mayfaire black|UGG Mayfaire chestnut|UGG Mayfaire chocolate|UGG Mayfaire sand|UGG Mayfaire red|UGG Nightfall|UGG Nightfall black|UGG Nightfall chestnut|UGG Nightfall chocolate|UGG Nightfall sand|UGG Sundance II|UGG Sundance II black|UGG Sundance II chestnut|UGG Sundance II chocolate|UGG Sundance II sand|UGG Ultimate Bind|UGG Ultimate Bind black|UGG Ultimate Bind chestnut|UGG Ultimate Bind chocolate|UGG Ultimate Bind sand|UGG Ultra Short|UGG Ultra Short chocolate|UGG Ultra Short sand|UGG Ultra Short black|UGG Ultra Tall|UGG Ultra Tall chestnut|UGG Ultra Tall sand|UGG Ultra Tall balck|UGG Ultra Tall chocolate|UGG Suede|UGG Suede black|UGG Suede chestnut|UGG Suede sand|UGG upside|UGG upside black|UGG upside chestnut|UGG upside mocha|UGG Roxy Tall|UGG Roxy Tall black|UGG Roxy Tall chestnut|UGG Roxy Tall chocolate|UGG Roxy Tall sand|UGG seline|UGG seline black|UGG seline chestnut|UGG Corinth Boots|UGG Liberty|UGG Liberty black|UGG Liberty cigar|UGG Highkoo|UGG Highkoo amber brown|UGG Highkoo espresso|UGG Highkoo grey|UGG Highkoo black|UGG Knightsbridge|UGG Knightsbridge black|UGG Knightsbridge chestnut|UGG Knightsbridge grey|UGG Knightsbridge sand|UGG Knightsbridge chocolate|UGG Adirondack|UGG Adirondack brown|UGG Adirondack chocolate|UGG Suburb Crochet|UGG Suburb Crochet black|UGG Suburb Crochet chestnut|UGG Suburb Crochet chocolate|UGG Suburb Crochet grey|UGG Suburb Crochet white|UGG Kensington|UGG Kensington black|UGG Kensington chestnut|UGG Roseberry|UGG Roseberry black|UGG Roseberry sand|UGG Gaviota|UGG Gaviota black|UGG Gaviota chestnut|UGG Gaviota chocolate|UGG Desoto|UGG Desoto black|UGG Desoto chestnut|UGG Desoto chocolate|UGG Brookfield Tall|UGG Brookfield Tall black|UGG Brookfield Tall chocolate|UGG Gissella|UGG Gissella black|UGG Gissella chestnut|UGG Gissella espresso|UGG Payton|UGG Payton black|UGG Payton chestnut|UGG Payton red|UGG Bailey Button Triplet|UGG Bailey Button Triplet black|UGG Bailey Button Triplet chestnut|UGG Bailey Button Triplet chocolate|UGG Bailey Button Triplet grey|UGG Bailey Button Triplet sand|There are so much style of cheap uggs for sale ,so once you go to my website you will be very surprise.

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 17:24 | Link to Comment dcb
dcb's picture

gold is a hedge against the unknown. considering I know what central bankers are doing I consider it a good thing to own some. The idea that these folks are actually going to reign in the money supply (at least in dollrs) flies in the face of everything I have seen since 1982.

Tue, 09/08/2009 - 20:08 | Link to Comment E Thomas St.
E Thomas St.'s picture

Then how does the price of gold from 1982 to 2002 figure into your analysis?

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 17:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 17:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 15:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 00:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/02/2009 - 00:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 15:48 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 13:07 | Link to Comment Mr. Mandelbrot
Mr. Mandelbrot's picture

I'd like to attempt to answer the author's question:  "Who's Going to Buy Gold?"  I think that as long as there are still human beings on this planet that choose to store their wealth in something real, there will be buyers for gold.  I cannot think of one other substance that I see signs advertising that it will be bought.  My local pawn shops don't advertise "WE BUY SOYBEANS," or "WE BUY COFFEE."   I like to imagine the bewilderment the intelligentsia of prior generations would experience if they were brought into our present where our preferred method of wealth preservation consists of speculation in abstract bits of information -- abstract claims to something abstract.

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 12:13 | Link to Comment lookma
lookma's picture

When investors buy SPY, SPY in turn has to go out and buy shares of S&P500 companies, driving up the price. This raises a little question: who will be buying this shares of S&P500 companies from SPY when investors decide to sell it? Shares of the S&P500 companies are one of those weird assets where nobody knows what it is really worth. You can run discounted cash-flow analysis to value it – but the value of that cash (i.e. fiat currency) is rapidly depreciating. It is an asset where perception and reality are deeply intertwined.

Investors buying the S&P 500 (SPY) are influencing the price of shares of S&P500 companies, which is fair for the most part, as otherwise they’d be buying the real thing. The ease of buying SPY creates a higher, artificial demand – but SPY is still fair game.

The violent selloff in SPY will be caused by factors that are hard to predict today (e.g., hedge-fund liquidations) but that will drive the price of shares of S&P500 companies down dramatically unless a real buyer steps in (like another government sick of owning the US debt, for instance), and the shares of S&P500 companies price could get cut in half overnight. Suddenly, perception of not being a store of value will create the reality of shares of S&P500 companies not being a store of value. The shares of S&P500 companies game will be over.

===================

Maybe not an exact fit but you get the idea.

Where is any meaningful analysis?  Ignoring the elephant in the room - GLD as a proxy for physical gold, amongst a litany of other issues, I see an argument that the price is going up because people are buying it (appears you could substitue any investment in for the word "it"), but when the "violent selloff" comes (assumes a "selloff" that will be "violent" because of undisclosed, hard to predict factors), who will buy it? 

 

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 11:53 | Link to Comment Josey Wales
Josey Wales's picture

"Gold is one of those assets where no one really knows what it is worth".  Yup, that is why I think we should all stick to assets that are accurately priced in free and effecient markets; like bank stocks and REITs and maybe a few CMBS or CDOs to reduce systemic risk.  Just buy and hold and wait for those green shoots to take us right up to the goose that lays the OTC derivative eggs!

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 15:14 | Link to Comment George the baby...
George the baby crusher's picture

Hours of deriving laughter....

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 10:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 08:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 16:27 | Link to Comment i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

i recall that you could take delivery of physical from GLD IF you were some special banking entity and you would take it in large chunks. Oddly, it seemed easier to sell your shares and head over to CRIMEX and buy a bar or two at the window... with fries.

 

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 08:27 | Link to Comment Bron Suchecki
Bron Suchecki's picture

The statements that COMEX futures contracts can be settled with GLD ETF shares is wrong.

That misinterpretation came from a GATA article talking about the announcement that GLD shares could be used in Exchange of Futures for Physical (EFP) transactions. It has nothing to do with physical settlement of a COMEX futures contract. I checked COMEX rule 113.02 and there is no mention of ETFs being allowed - only physical is allowed. See also seekingalpha.com/user/...

The issue with EFPs is explained better by Tom Szabo (silveraxis.com/todayin.../). His key point is that an EFP is an "exchange" and there is no change in the number of futures at the end of the transaction - so an EFP done with an ETF  does not "settle" a COMEX futures contract.

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 08:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 08:11 | Link to Comment dubaican
dubaican's picture

I agree gold infomercials are irritating. They cheapen the investment and make it feel like a scam. However, i don't see a lack of buyers in the near future. Look at it this way would you rather own gold or the euro and sterling? Clearly there is an element of reserve diversifcation going on. Gold will benefit for as long as this period of fiat skepticims persists.

Sat, 09/19/2009 - 05:40 | Link to Comment Mediocritas
Mediocritas's picture

Wading into the paper PM debate. People do understand that we're talking about unallocated bullion right? (Just read the prospectus for GLD or SLV if you don't believe me). If you were to demand full allocation, or audit their 'holdings' then the chance of booked ounces matching physical ounces is exactly the same chance as me being the reincarnation of Michael Jackson.

I don't understand why anyone would want to take a long position in these ETFs. Risk after risk after risk with no reward bar simplicity. Best of all, your 'physical' holdings actually decrease over time due to the fee design of these funds. Perhaps the biggest smack in the face is that with allocated metal being such a small percentage of net 'holdings', your long position, in reality, can translate into a short, or worse, naked short position, thereby having the exact opposite effect on price that you would expect. I'm not saying that it necessarily will be, I'm just saying that the design of the fund means that it *can* be.

Call me a consiracy nut if you want but if you wanted to maintain or build a large short position on precious metals, what better way is there to do it than to run a paper ETF backed by unallocated bullion that makes it impossible for participants to take delivery and trigger a squeeze? I consider it a tad suspicious that when Bear Stearns went down, silver didn't squeeze big even though Bear held the single largest commercial short position, and perhaps the single largest % short position on any commodity in history (according to Ted Butler).

Bear Stearns was acquired by JPM which, instead of liquidating that insane position (a relic of hunting the Hunts), proceeded to add to it. Guess who the custodian for SLV is? Yes, none other than JPM. Similar story for HSBC and GLD.

From every angle this smells like a scam, which explains why many big names strongly suggest you stay away and take physical delivery.

Vitaliy may, or may not, be correct in suggesting that GLD influences gold prices. Once you understand how these ETFs actually work then you can see how the link between PM ETFs and real metal prices is not so easy to predict.

Pay close attention to China and Russia. If they demand full allocation and soak up physical from here on in with tulip-mania induced amonst the peons, then eventually these ETFs will break. As I've said before, I'm ready for the counter-intuitive long physical, short ETF play.

I wouldn't be me if I didn't end with the usual cynicism....those hoping for the BRICs to bust the decades long uber-short should consider that the BRICs are simply wanting in on the game and causing a little friction to get what they want. If the BRICs take physical and then launch their own paper ETFs then PM prices are going nowhere, just a brief pop while people change chairs then back to suppression as usual.

There is a glimmer of hope though that the BRICs are honest and are going to bust the scam open. How ironic to be depending on China and Russia to return 'free' to free market.

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 07:13 | Link to Comment aus_punter
aus_punter's picture

Maybe Mr T was onto something all those years ago

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 05:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 03:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 02:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 01:15 | Link to Comment Sabibaby
Sabibaby's picture

The commercials for Gold in America really don’t matter because America isn’t a player anymore. It’s about what the rest of the world is doing. America isn’t the driving force behind gold, it’s everyone else –the other 95% of the population.

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 00:55 | Link to Comment flaxpin
flaxpin's picture

I think you present a fair view of the argument against.  But it's a large logical jump with your statement:

>> Suddenly, perception of not being a store of value will create the reality of gold not being a store of value. The gold game will be over.

Gold's perception of value can't be overridden, it's inate.  While the levels of perception can change, it won't ever go to zero.

 

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 00:54 | Link to Comment luckylee
luckylee's picture

I think people who are betting on paper gold will lose money. I am not buying GLD, I am adding more physical gold as soon as there is a correction.

Sun, 09/06/2009 - 23:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/06/2009 - 23:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/06/2009 - 23:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/06/2009 - 23:01 | Link to Comment Sqworl
Sqworl's picture

Im sticking to my diamonds...gold is not pure and to gamed into speculation...:-)

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 09:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/06/2009 - 22:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/06/2009 - 23:36 | Link to Comment Stuart
Stuart's picture

He's a CFA!  Kool Aid drinkers society bar no equal.  'Nuff said.  Run as fast as you can away...

Sun, 09/06/2009 - 22:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/06/2009 - 22:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/06/2009 - 22:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 09/08/2009 - 20:00 | Link to Comment E Thomas St.
E Thomas St.'s picture

Shifting the timeframe to reference doesn't make the investment any better.

 

 

Sun, 09/06/2009 - 22:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 16:17 | Link to Comment i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

re: silver vs tank of gas: with tongue in cheek, i ask if a manipulated metals market cancels a manipulated oil market...

i'm with you otherwise.

 

Sun, 09/06/2009 - 21:46 | Link to Comment gookempucky
gookempucky's picture

+ 100

Try using something other than wikepedia--GLD nothing but a paper chase. Countries rank as follows;

US-8100 tons (doubtful)

Ger-3400

France-2480

Italy-2451-swaps with UBS=probably tapped out

China-1054

Swiss-1040-sellers

Japan-843

Russia-523

England-piss poor

Have a great labor day all

Sun, 09/06/2009 - 21:52 | Link to Comment Rollerball
Rollerball's picture

Lead, backed by gun powder wrapped in copper, trumps gold.

Disclosure:  long granite futures.

Sun, 09/06/2009 - 21:07 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

Fools are going to buy gold. I own gold, I am a fool. GLD will be required to prove it's holding of gold at the end of October. There is a good possibility that the SEC will stop trading if it does not, same for SLV. GLD does not hold the amount of gold it claims to have. Gold will be $ 980/once at the end of 2009, 2010,2011. But, you will be able to buy it from the government much cheaper. If gold is going to $ 2,500/ounce sometime in our lifetime, then what is the difference if I bought gold at $850/ounce or $400/ounce? Gold makes for a great story. Just like the story of my $ 90,000 house being worth $180,000 seven years after I bought it. If it was not for fools, we would all be broke.

Mon, 09/07/2009 - 16:14 | Link to Comment i.knoknot
i.knoknot's picture

please substantiate the GLD audit. imagine what would happen to the price of gold if GLD were proven NOT to have the claimed metal. wow.

that jump could buy a few beers (per oz of real gold...)

i look at the pictures on the GLD website and can't help but think hollywood and gold-coated plaster ingots. i guess that's how skeptical i've become. i can't help it when i look at the power structures and their agendas... consider the timeless 'wag the dog' flick.

wild world we live in.

Sun, 09/06/2009 - 21:04 | Link to Comment michigan independant
michigan independant's picture

To many forget some lessons. Read gen. chapter 47 about value and the law of marginal utility since problems can exist and nobody with a sense can forget the ratio of production. Ask a question where do you get your food? Some say from the market. This is true but I was raised on a farm. Never forget your point a to b is not my point a to b and the farm is where I will retire. I think it is prudent to plan for your grandchildren's inheritance if they are worthy and accountable only. I received a gift from my father in a tax exempt structure. A gift is defined generational in our family. I will consider some metals but this spike may or could subside. Check mining chemicals which processes copper zinc etc its ticking up. Value in others household is not ours. Gold is a utility question to put you at ease in what time? Some Gold could never hurt.

Sun, 09/06/2009 - 21:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Sun, 09/06/2009 - 20:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 09/07/2009 - 00:21 | Link to Comment Project Mayhem
Project Mayhem's picture

I have always liked apmex.

http://apmex.com

Sun, 09/06/2009 - 20:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!