This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Wholesale Inventories Miss Expectations Of 1%, Print -0.2%, First Decline Since November 2009

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Is the biggest driver to GDP growth (aside from the government's transfer payments of course) starting to ebb? November wholesale inventories printed at -0.2%, the first decline since 2009, a miss of expectations of 1.0%, and a drop from October's revised 1.7%.

From the release:

Total inventories of merchant wholesalers, except manufacturers’ sales branches and offices, after adjustment for seasonal variations but not for price changes, were $425.5 billion at the end of November, down 0.2 percent (+/-0.4%)  from the revised October level, but were up 8.4 percent (+/-1.2%) from a year ago. The October preliminary estimate was revised downward $0.7 billion or 0.2 percent.

Just as importantly the inventories/sales ratio was down to 1.15, compared to 1.19 a year ago

Arguably, this is not good news for the coming advance GDP look.

Full report link.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:10 | 867009 Dr. Doom
Dr. Doom's picture

Bob Pisani said this number was better-than expected When the number comes in higher its better, and when it comes in lower is better, wait...what?

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:24 | 867197 LooseLee
LooseLee's picture

PIS-ON-ME is a conformist uber-shill. Hasn't had an original thought for decades....

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:28 | 867212 Cdad
Cdad's picture

Thank you Dr. Doom for saying what I would have said were it not the case that I have been sleeping late and napping today as the market tries to pretend, once again, that everything is super great.

About Bob Pisani, you are correct.  Everything is bullish no matter what.  That is because Bob Pisani sold his credibility sometime back knowing that the Blow Horn [CNBC] was taking a long walk on a short pier.  Hell, what does it matter anyway since he has his application in at L. Blankfein Wildest Dreams Park [oil futures]?  Bob has a new catch phrase to announce his condition, which is exactly, "I think the important thing here is..."  The Bob decides all important things now. 

BTW, Loyd, nice mini crime wave there on EUR/USD, DXY, and Wildest Dreams Park...all at once...sweet!  Average Joes all over the country are loving just how obvious it all is...and some of us are actually betting that even Mary Shapiro can figure this one out.

And more market credibility dies face down on the street at the corner of Wall And Broad...while Ben Bernanke rewards criminal syndicate Wall Street bankers everywhere...at Average Joe's expense....double sweet!

 

 

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:57 | 867301 Common_Cents22
Common_Cents22's picture

Did anyone notice that CNBC teleprompter readers are now being included on panels as financial experts in the lame stream media?    It's laughable.   They are talking like they have been running billions themselves for years.    They get on the sunday morning NBC talk shows and each others shows on CNBS as experts.   

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:09 | 867010 HamyWanger
HamyWanger's picture

This is good news. A drop in Inventories means a bounce in consumer spending.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:12 | 867016 Salinger
Salinger's picture

You obviously have a good understanding of economic matters so perhaps you could expand on why this is good news.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:14 | 867020 Sophist Economicus
Sophist Economicus's picture

Hamy is using sarcasm here....He's Harry's amped-up ego

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:18 | 867035 Salinger
Salinger's picture

damn, i missed that

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:33 | 867052 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

There have been several alter ego street performers by multiple names appear on ZH since Harry jumped the shark. Like Pavlov's dogs, we are all tuned to jump at the American flag and glance at the name. Yup that's Harry all right, still bouncing off the insane asylum walls.

The way things are going, we'll all be eating dog food soon enough anyway.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 13:08 | 867326 Johrny Bravo
Johrny Bravo's picture

rice and lamb for me CD!

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 13:33 | 867393 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

LOL

But the difference with you my fine Shakespearean friend is that the original hasn't been seen in ages. At least Harry shows up now and then. :>)

Unless of course you are.............

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:19 | 867042 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

I vote for a steel cage grudge match between Harry and Hamy. Sarcasm receives the highest points and dreamy eyed drooling in the POMO cup the lowest.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:35 | 867075 doomandbloom
doomandbloom's picture

what about Harny Wanger...where did he go?

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:47 | 867096 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

I think Harny and Hamy are the same guy/gal.

There was also a Harry Wanker at one point. I suspect the Wanker farcical alter ego was just a training op for the Harny/Hamy iterations. Think of the endless possibilities.

Of course old Harry could be pulling all our chains. But based upon Harry's posts, he lacks the imagination.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:49 | 867100 goldmiddelfinger
goldmiddelfinger's picture

Fair, balanced ...and unafraid

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:04 | 867138 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

And why would he be afraid? Harry seems to have an unlimited supply of the natural painkiller "dopamine". Even when the brain senses Harry's had enough and begins to Bogart the level of dreamy dopamine delivery, Harry just seeks out information that fuels his confirmation bias...which primes the dopamine pump once again. Then it's off to the races.

Who would have thought the good Lord was The Pusherman?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMqVrUSz62o

 

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:19 | 867041 treemagnet
treemagnet's picture

Only problem is you'd say its good news if inventories were up too.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:46 | 867099 EscapeKey
EscapeKey's picture

These 'fake' accounts are getting really old.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:10 | 867157 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Personally I think they provide a ZH public service, forcing us all to slow down and carefully re-read a comment that's just triggered us before rolling out the battle tanks.

But that's just me.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:10 | 867011 goldmiddelfinger
goldmiddelfinger's picture

Expect equities to trade even higher on this

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:15 | 867024 The Profit Prophet
The Profit Prophet's picture

"Expect equities to trade even higher on (insert good or bad economic news here)"

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:13 | 867018 Sophist Economicus
Sophist Economicus's picture

No, no, no.   This is great news!    It means that retail cannot keep the stuff in their warehouse or on their shelves.    Seems like nobody here is getting the right memos and talking points.    We gotta fix that

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:10 | 867158 espirit
espirit's picture

No, according to the BDI, warehouses are not being replenished.

Drawdown on inventory perhaps?

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:44 | 867260 Id fight Gandhi
Id fight Gandhi's picture

It's bad cuz inventories are restocked to keep pace with demand.

Its good cuz it's a coiled spring and leave room for more growth as inventory needs repurchasing.

If 1% was expected then GDP figures that in already. They need to be adjusted down.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:51 | 867286 SDRII
SDRII's picture

inventory builds exceeded sales for 5 months prior to past two sales "outperformance"; catchup on sales and normalization of cycle. Inventory builds have averaged about 50-60B or so coming out of "recessions" vs. the 120B or so last Q. GS better hope PCE is 4%+

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:16 | 867026 Dr. Engali
Dr. Engali's picture

Up up we go. Should be good enough to take us to 12,000.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:21 | 867029 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

imo inventories on some stuff have been ridiculously low for many many weeks. Thrice I have been out chasing my tail looking for a retailer with a television or appliance in stock. They all have tons of the store name crap but were out of the higher end sonys and samsungs. Very long lead times to order as well. This could be construed as bullish or bearish and my town is something of an anomoly so it may mean nothing at all.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:42 | 867090 T Rex
T Rex's picture

Consider Baltic Dry

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:53 | 867107 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

I suspect faulty purchasing for some of it. the reasoning that nobody has any money so they will only buy the cheap crap on credit and nothing else so why buy a bunch of higher end inventory. Then there are the store like home depot that never have any inventory and others that are being very careful. As far as electronics they are also constantly changing technology and don't want to be caught with obsolete stock that they have to sell at a loss. Lately I have been buying whatever I want because I see empty shelves in the not too distant future. As for baltic dry they certainly have no lack of shipping inventory. lmao.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:23 | 867031 Hollow_Point
Hollow_Point's picture

nevermind

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:23 | 867047 Aknownymouse
Aknownymouse's picture

precisly!  this is why it is all good news /sarcasm

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:18 | 867032 Caviar Emptor
Caviar Emptor's picture

Good news will turn to bad and bad to good as the end of days approaches.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:24 | 867048 goldmiddelfinger
goldmiddelfinger's picture

Ah yes, the ole cliff at the end of the world. Yes those were the days my friend and I will always cherish with fondness the memories thereof.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:26 | 867051 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Any news is good news.  Also, no news is good news.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:29 | 867063 slow_roast
slow_roast's picture

Drink the Kook-AIDS birches!!!!!

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:32 | 867072 KickIce
KickIce's picture

Shocking, people bought Christmas presents.

Question is, will retailers restock because they see additional demand or will they leave their warehouses bare?  Since we are hearing reports that retail execs are selling their shares...

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:54 | 867111 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

The holiday shopping season wasnt that great! Retailers know it, and they know people going forward are buying BARE NECESSITIES on sale 2 fer 1! People are at all time record BROKE so talk of how the consumer is set to go on some kind of wild spending spree thru the year to rekindle 'Borrow and Consume' economic model is just the height of lunacy. As CD says above, 'whats any of it matter, we'll all be eating dog food soon anyway'.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 11:57 | 867117 Rogerwilco
Rogerwilco's picture

Holding large inventories is dumb if one expects selling prices to decline...

POMO may have lulled it to sleep, but the deflation dragon is still out there.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:05 | 867141 Boilermaker
Boilermaker's picture

The REITs have halted their sell-off (same as the last *insert huge number here* days) and, presto, at 10:45 have started their ramrod push back to parity.

Truly, truly, beyond belief at this point.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:05 | 867142 stoneman sacked
stoneman sacked's picture

How the f**k will this matter?

You have QE3 scheduled in Mid 2011. 

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:28 | 867211 the grateful un...
the grateful unemployed's picture

they've nursed us back to precrash levels just about everywhere, except employment. the inventory to sales ratio is right where it was 2003-2007, which was a period of decent economic growth, (and housing bubble economics). Just in time inventory has changed this dynamic quite a bit. but i agree with the basic premise that retailers are allowing inventories to drop because the business just ain't there. i notice this at the super, where merchandise at its expiration date is marked down, and lately there is a lot less of that.

but eventually if you are a supplier and you think prices are going higher (like crude oil) you would take oil off the market, and thusly Peak Oil is really Peek-A-Boo-Oil, today the field is empty, tomorrow its up and running. And gas is $5. 

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 12:36 | 867237 pazmaker
pazmaker's picture

JIT at work.......

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 13:53 | 867450 Rogerwilco
Rogerwilco's picture

@paz

Exactly. Why should U.S. wholesalers maintain inventory (and bear the risk) when China and Japan will do it at no extra cost? Of course all bets are off if the 6000-mile supply chain experiences a disruption or backwardation.

Tue, 01/11/2011 - 14:55 | 867657 roadrage666
roadrage666's picture

"Arguably, this is not good news for the coming advance GDP look."

 

At the risk of being tarred & feathered by the group here, I'd argue it actually IS good news for GDP and stocks, albeit in the near-term only. Historically/empirically speaking, equities outperform when inventory-to-sales ratio is falling. (Changes in the absolute level of inventories are harder correlate to the business cycle.) Maybe this is relationship is the result of unsustainable Keynesian consumption, butm all things equal, destocking (relative to sales) usually implies increased economic activity, which in turn means higher stock prices. The data bear this out. The harder-to-reconcile period was earlier in 2010: when inv/sales was steadily rising and equities were levitating. But to Pazmaker's point, this relationship may be less robust in the future than in the past...but JIT inventory has been impacting the business cycle since the mid-1990s and the relationship btwn this ratio and stock prices/GDP has been reasonably stable.   

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!