This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Why Should GS And NYSE Stocks Be Nervous About The Flash Ban?

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Ignore the retracement, it is just the 19 year old momo quants "with no financial or business background" who are about to get a rude awakening in what happens when non-linear equations diverge from the stock market.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:22 | 24059 RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

Looks like the quants are in a hurry before the flash trading is shut down.

Check out Orbitz and MBI.

They are picking out overshorted junkers and gunning these in a hell squeeze.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:32 | 24092 Eduardo
Eduardo's picture

Today's chart of CIT above $1 looks quite interesting

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:33 | 24098 Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

Airlines, Bond Insurers, REITs (even Hotel/Motel whatcha gonna do, say what?)...  I haven't even opened a Heatmap yet today.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:36 | 24103 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Is the usd/jpy sitting at an unbreachable high at 95.4? Let's remember the old carry trade's complicity in this ramp job. Conversely, is usd/jpy sell the safest position in the market? It should break 90 and 80 is not that far off.

Did you sell oww and mbi at the top today?

Voldy

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:04 | 24159 curbyourrisk
curbyourrisk's picture

Think that is hot.....check out GGC.

 

This is a dog of a company.....high debt and huge overhang in inventory.  Yet...it is flying.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:18 | 24192 Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

Avoided BK, for now.  That's worth a 10-bagger.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:49 | 24395 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I blogged about GGC a week ago, It was in my list of "failed" companies along with likes of PEIX, CTHR and so on...Look at how these basturds are making shorts to cover forcefully and creating a bubble...I just hope that the doomsday is in sight.

Dow at 20 points will be short of giving me pleasure and to see the banksters on kneels begging for food will make the day.

People are not even warmedup for talking about Proj. Mayhem yet, and many week apples are talking about victory after the flash order ban.

TD, wake the people up, set targets please. People are very naive and need a lot of leadership and spoon feeding.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:13 | 24187 ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

you could have made a fortune in the past year buying and selling the likes of MBI, ABK, RDN, PMI, MTG.  They are all basically back where they were this time last year, with multiple trips up and down several hundred percent.  they must have betas of 100.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:26 | 24075 peterpeter
peterpeter's picture

This will have a tiny impact on GS.

If you want to worry about it hurting a particular company, I would set sights on Pipeline Trading... since if the SEC next decides to ban dark pools (a decision I could only imagine is based on the poor choice of name from a public marketing perspective), then much of their gig is up.

I for one hope that the "ban" means that there will still be a way for people who would like to place flash orders to do so.  I enjoyed the increased liquidity rebates that flash orders provided, and do not relish paying higher route-out fees in the future as a result of this popular backlash.

 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:28 | 24082 Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden's picture

So you think the SEC response is based purely on a "populist backlash" - let's maybe wait to see what their findings conclude.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:46 | 24125 peterpeter
peterpeter's picture

I do look forward to reading the SEC's rationale for why these order types will be banned (they are probably trying to sort that out as I type this, looking for things to change in Reg NMS).

I do think there are legitimate issues surrounding flash, but I thought that the best approach was for the institutions who didn't like their orders flashed to make the TRIVIAL changes to not flash them.  If you don't like the trading facilities provided by a particular ECN or exchange, that is what competition is for.

I believe that the market would have sorted this out on its own in short order (with ludite institutional investors moving orders away from ECNs that flashed their orders when appropriate to do so).  But if replacing the 4 letters "EDGA" with "ISLD" in their orders was really too technically difficult for them, then I guess the market needed to get senators and the SEC involved to give them a hand...

We'll see how much the large institutions who's ability to squeal about flash orders rather than make a 4 character order routing change like it if dark pools are shutdown (a change that I think would be a grave mistake, but from which I expect to profit).

 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:08 | 24164 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

profit how

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:23 | 24206 peterpeter
peterpeter's picture

Dark pools are used to make block trades without moving the market.

Without going into specifics of my trading software, if those orders are posted on exchanges/ECNs where I can see the bid/ask, or at least see the trade go by in a timely manner for orders that don't post to the order book - then I have a more accurate picture of the equities my strategy is following, and there are additional mis-priced orders for me to execute against.

I get more accurate pricing information and more looks at poorly priced orders.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:26 | 24213 Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden's picture

How about dark pool Indications of Interests - you have no problem with blatant potential abuse there?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:39 | 24245 peterpeter
peterpeter's picture

No, I don't.

Orders end up in dark pools because someone executing the trade thought that it was the best way for them to unwind or accumulate a position.  There are all sorts of issues pro and con (I think the biggest frankly is that the execution price is based off of NBBO, and NBBO is delayed by several ms over what someone with L2 access to each feed to generate on their own) - but the people playing in the dark pools are grown-ups.

Sometimes these grown-ups are idiots, but other times - they are making rationale decisions armed with the understanding of the tradeoffs.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:16 | 24466 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

One wonders how AIG will do on this Friday's earnings
report. Watch the hilarity ensue Thursday afternoon.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:15 | 24190 dnarby
dnarby's picture

I'm trying to see how would leveling the playing field by democratizing the speed of all orders to say, 800 miliseconds is a bad thing...  But I've got nothin'.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:28 | 24216 peterpeter
peterpeter's picture

You could just stop all trading and "level the playing field".

800ms is more than enough to keep a server in Hong Kong and trade.  If you can't afford co-location, and you can't afford an account with a broker that will allow you to co-locate in their data center ($100K is all you need to get 1ms access), then surely you can afford a cable modem closer to the venues than Hong Kong.

As for the downside you don't see... if orders were held or delayed somehow for 800ms, then orders would be adjusted to the new risk environment and would be less agressive, resulting in less liquid markets with lower trading volumes and higher bid/ask spreads. 

 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 18:48 | 24942 dnarby
dnarby's picture

Somehow I don't think we're talking about the same thing.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:07 | 25328 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Try trading F and HMC see the difference

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:23 | 24205 joann
joann's picture

@ peterpeter, re: "increased liquidity"

Is that the same type of liquidity that subprime mortgages offered the market with no down and no docs?

 

Yeah that worked out well ... didn't it?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:44 | 24262 peterpeter
peterpeter's picture

No Joann, it is not.

Liquidity in your context means available capital to finance a bubble.

Liquidity in my context means an order posted to an order book which is visible to market participants, does not executve immediately, and which improves the previously posted best bid (i.e. is higher) or best ask (i.e. is lower).

Same work, but about as much to do with each other as the liquidity in the beer I look forward to having later today.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:35 | 24234 Deferred Comp
Deferred Comp's picture

Why do you label institutions as Luddites ?  Don't you see how this has evolved ?  All of the "competition" and free market soulutions have once again benefitted the few at the expense of the many.  There is no possible way to determine who is sniffing these systems looking to disadvantage users.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:47 | 24271 peterpeter
peterpeter's picture

If you don't think that the record tight bid/ask spread and ridiculously low trading costs the US equity markets enjoy has been a benefit to the many, then all I can say is we greatly disagree...

And I called them luddites because they were incapable of making the most trivial of changes (literally 4 characters!) in their order routing to avoid flashing, if that is what they wanted to do.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:39 | 24374 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Peter, Good point. Actually the situation seems to be even more benign than you describe. When they added flash order types you had to actually change software to make use of them (ie to avoid them you didn't even need to make a trivial change).

For example, at the bottom of page 4 of Nasdaq's BX spec you can see they added two new codes for flash orders so you'd change from one of the old codes to "S" or "F" to send it as a flash:
http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/content/technicalsupport/specifications/Trad...

As for the SEC's rationale I think it won't be a sham. Before this ill-informed populist "frontrunning" nonsense, there was already some debate in front of the SEC about flash orders circumventing the original purpose of Reg NMS because the flash wasn't immediately disseminated across all markets and reflected in the NBBO. There were reasonable people on both sides of the issue and it would be perfectly reasonable for the SEC to outlaw flash on this basis.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:58 | 24140 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The fact remains that in the months you have been around, you have led your readership to slaughter.

Shorts have been bankrupted. No one bought a share since you insisted this was all going to zero.

Have you no shame?

Are you Cramer?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:00 | 24144 Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden's picture

I, indeed, have no shame in presenting facts. As for investment recommendations, which Zero Hedge does not indulge in, I am sure you will find CNBC more suitable for investing style.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:32 | 24224 rD2.0
rD2.0's picture

Don't listen to these idiots Tyler. You are doing a great job! Without you the thefts of Goldman et al would never be revealed

Nobody talks about all this stuff on TV or the blogosphere

Most do not understand it... and those you do, do not talk about it because they are the ones making money from these scams

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:34 | 24232 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Everyone needs to take a deep breath...

ZH provides great information if you want to educate yourself on a wide range of topics. I am 100% long and I read everything TD and the crew write.

If you only read negative sources of news and opinion, and use that to reinforce your own worldview you will miss out on not only stock market rallies but a lot of other good ways to make money. If you only watch CNBC, well, I don't know what to say.

Keep at TD. You do a great job.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:46 | 24268 Wilderman
Wilderman's picture

Absolutely, ignore the yapping dogs and continue pulling at the curtain.  Your content is priceless.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:06 | 24309 Consistently_In...
Consistently_Incredulous's picture

I second that

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:08 | 24167 SilverIsKing
SilverIsKing's picture

You are probably the guy who was telling Peter Schiff he was all wrong in 2006 and 2007.  Facts win.  Sorry you are using this site for short term investment advice.  That alone speaks to your lack of intelligence and sophistication.  BTW, grab another bag for the head.  You need it.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:11 | 24180 JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

Actually by pointing out the manipulations, crooks, cronies and other assorted and accurate market information one could have concluded that going long would be wise (why fight city hall?).

I believe the disclaimer on this site says it all. You should read it.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:13 | 24185 mule65
mule65's picture

Don't assume all readers are bears.  Far more bulls have been slaughtered. 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:19 | 24194 dnarby
dnarby's picture

Lemmesee...  Cramer offers all sorts of hyperactive 'investing' advice, and has a 50% accuracy rate at best (although if you check the ones he got *really* wrong, I'd think on a dollar % basis he's waaaaay below 50% (e.g. Bear Stearns call).

 

Tyler doesn't offer any investing advice, but just calmly presents facts and analysis you can't get anywhere else.

 

I think that would make him the Anti-Cramer.  Quick!   Shave his head and look for the mark!

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:22 | 24203 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Why dont you shut the fuck up asswipe?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:44 | 24546 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

You got to be kidding. Tyler has provided no trading advice that I am aware of. We are grown ups here.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 16:21 | 24647 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Replies are those of KoolAid drinking fan boys.

Every day for the last 5 months TD has warned you that it was about to hit the fan, only a matter of time, its all falling apart, its all rigged, only a moron could be long.

And this is what you enjoy?

The random tidbit thats of interest has nothing to do with the fact that this site is 100% BEARISH. Fuck the disclaimer, thats BS and TD knows it.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 17:15 | 24763 Arm
Arm's picture

Another fool.  Of course we have lost money.  That does not mean we got the analysis wrong.  It only means we got the timing wrong.

Go ahead buy a plenty.  Hope you get out on time.  Bear market rallies can last years (seldom). You might get lucky

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 18:31 | 24905 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

lol @ "the market is wrong"

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:49 | 24276 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Personally, the SEC couldn't fight it's way out of a paper bag!! LOOK, I mean really LOOK at the Trillions in fraud that went on right beneath their noses, that they chose to do NOTHING about.

Honestly- We would all be better off with Jessica Simpson at the Helm. Throw Mary to the wolves--she has earned it.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:29 | 24088 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The reality is really sinking in. My bank was shut down by the FDIC. Just days before the shut down, I renewed my CD against better judgment. Well the new bank stepped in but it doesnt make me feel much better. How long can this continue?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:33 | 24094 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Obama is president now, fool. Cars, healthcare, and banking is a human right. It will continue until you no longer need it.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:36 | 24107 Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

It's not only a right, it's your responsibility to buy.  Now.  No point in resisting.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:41 | 24115 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

yeh and if he gets his way, it will be everyone over 39 gets the needle....

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:20 | 24198 Sqworl
Sqworl's picture

Government Deathcare...those over 40...follow green line...Soylent Department...await instructions.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:25 | 24212 aldousd
aldousd's picture

so that's what they meant by Green Jobs!

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:24 | 24343 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

i agree any health care package passed this year is going to be garbage because both the dems and repubs are just bought off shills. but i'm a single payer advocate, which by the way , warren pollack's piece here, called the great reset, says they are many good benefits to a single payer healthcare system.

but you're comment seems to reflect the repubs, via limbaugh, talking point. so tell us, what is your solution to the healthcare dilemma?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:09 | 24315 Consistently_In...
Consistently_Incredulous's picture

Anyone for a remake of Logan's Run?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:47 | 24549 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The speed limit will be 12 mph so that electric toys can provide green transportation.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:12 | 25338 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

1960s democrat platform?
everything is a human right

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:02 | 24150 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Well maybe you should use your better judgement and cash in that CD and buy a few gold coins.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:49 | 24278 Wilderman
Wilderman's picture

Maybe you should count your blessings:  at least you got taken in while Sheila still had some cookies in the jar.  I'm going out to interview local credit unions this afternoon.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:35 | 24099 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

you are getting more mystic by the day, care to help us novices what a flash order is, so that we could chip in with our thoughts?

BTW, a very unique blog indeed.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:55 | 24133 e1even1
e1even1's picture

"you are getting more mystic by the day, care to help us novices what a flash order is, so that we could chip in with our thoughts?"

http://www.tradersmagazine.com/issues/20_296/-103978-1.html

then, google 'flash order'

then, there's a tag up by the headline for other related columns.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:35 | 24101 ToNYC
ToNYC's picture

Lloyd puts out the call to lay low. Is that nervous?

That new HFT building that's going up to skim the market cream forever, even if there is no real new money but only remaining mutual fund rips.

How you like me now?!

Lloyd says to hide the bling..right out of Gooldfellas with Jimmy reading the riot act on seeing the new car pull up to the bar..of course now it's Goldfellas!

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:39 | 24112 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

New car?? Buuuuullshit. That was a baby pink Caddy Eldorado convertible coupe. Go ahead, call it a car again, I dare you.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:43 | 24118 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

ah, would you mind if we called it a "tank"? :)

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:06 | 24162 Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:16 | 24328 Consistently_In...
Consistently_Incredulous's picture

Hahaha - "Jimmy" Blankfein...

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:44 | 24122 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

so i would deduce there TD, that perhaps there is another one of those parabolic downslope red lines in our very near future, perhaps in as little as 5 minutes, like you have said before?

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:46 | 24126 Tyler Durden
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:55 | 24134 Bruce Krasting
Bruce Krasting's picture

TD: You every think you would be on the same page as Chuck S. two months ago? Funny how these things work out....

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:01 | 24148 RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

REIT Squeeze underway....



Chart Image Code

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:12 | 24181 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

Chum.  churn.  Rinse & repeat.

Great insight.  Thanks

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:03 | 24154 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Gold and Silver zooming today. Decoupled from USD and both in backwardation. Now let's get the Comex.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:22 | 24202 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

If Gold keeps rising despite the bullion banks' huge short positions, the upside explosion past $1000 will be a sight to behold. It will be the most spectacular explosion in the price of anything ever. For those on the right side of the trade, fortunes of a lifetime will be made.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:50 | 24279 Gunther
Gunther's picture

Gordon,

If the bullion banks would have to cover their shorts at way more then 1000$/oz they will be broke. My guess is that the rules will be changed to protect the financial system. Futures will probably be settled in paper, be it cash or gld shares that are paper too. It will get interesting if the buyer is powerful enough to force settlement in real metal.

Jason Hommel looked at OTC positions in “other precious metals” from the BIS at 190 billion$ for (mostly) silver. The market for gold is way bigger, where will the money come from to buy the metal and will the actual owners sell for paper at all?

http://news.silverseek.com/GoldIsMoney/1247075892.php

Gunther

 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:40 | 24375 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Actually, the bullion banks are already broke. All that's backing their operations is a printing press. The day they will be *really* broke is when people stop accepting paper money at which point Gold will not be sold for any amount of paper. Till we get to that point, I think there is a lot of room left for the price to rise because all they have to do is provide enough printed paper to the holders of physical metal in order to entice them to sell. Also, I think the fiat money system will end (actually, it already is) in a hyperinflationary explosion. What we are seeing now is only the beginning of that phase, so going forward I think a lot of observers will be surprised and confused by the extent of rise in the price of anything that is a real asset.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 16:19 | 24641 Dr. Kenneth Noi...
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater's picture

 

The day they will be *really* broke is when people stop accepting paper money at which point Gold will not be sold for any amount of paper.

So how long after that does lead trump gold? Specifically, lead in roughly 4g quantities travelling at about 900m/s? (you can't eat gold, but you can use the threat of high-velocity lead to take gold from someone else :p)

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:14 | 25343 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Delivery can be counted as cash equivalent GLD etf :)

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:05 | 24161 curbyourrisk
curbyourrisk's picture

Fuck Goldman....

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:08 | 24165 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

http://goingconcern.com/2009/08/sec-memo-says-guaranty-bank-to.php

look td, a big texas bank is going down and the fdic is taking the pipe for the whole load too......

aw..........

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:08 | 24168 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

NYX popped on the news of the flash ban.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:10 | 24175 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Td, I know this is totally off topic, but have you heard anything lately from Hayman Capital? You have quoted them in teh past. I would love to hear their recent thoughts, particulalry on the dollar and the inflation / deflation debate.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:10 | 24177 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

60% of new vehicles purchased under Cash for Clunkers are Toyoto, Honda and Hyundai

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:51 | 24564 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I hope with all my heart that the other 40% of vehicles I bought for other people are Fords.

I have heard very encouraging rumors that GM and Chrysler are being passed over as the lukewarm night of the living dead UAW minions that they are.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:12 | 24182 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I do love this place, some moron comes in believing that we are all short.. maybe we are skeptical of this manufactured bull market and choose to be cautious. Remember the second mouse gets the cheese.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:14 | 24188 Oso
Oso's picture

FYI - i just requested that all of my funds' order routing be excluded from any dark pools with GSEC-REDI.  This means our order flow will no longer go through Sigma X or MS' and UBS' pools.  Am curious to see if our executions are any different.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:30 | 24220 Bolweevil
Bolweevil's picture

please update periodically!

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:18 | 24193 Anonymous
Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:22 | 24201 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

we here at zero intelligence don't talk much about gay beaker and his silly show. :)

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:57 | 24585 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

WE DON'T FUCKING CLICK ON CNBC LINKS HERE!

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 16:21 | 24646 Dr. Kenneth Noi...
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater's picture

Is that the third rule of ZH? ;)

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:19 | 24195 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

With JPM at $40 or BAC running hrough $16 the equity deals can't be far off - the cap markets pipleline looking very thin and seq. comps hrorible, the pump must go on...

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:19 | 24197 Cursive
Cursive's picture


"Why Should GS And NYSE Stocks Be Nervous About The Flash Ban?"

 

GS - because their golden goose is about to be slaughtered.

NYSE - because they'll potentially be holding a black swan rather than a golden goose.

 

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:24 | 24211 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

oh heck, the goldman sachs squid, when in trouble can always belly up to the government tarp window and get drunk again, on taxpayer money, and then call it profits .........again....

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:37 | 24370 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Umm, NYSE doesn't offer Flash trades. NASDAQ, BATS, DIRECTEDGE, AND CBSX do, and it only represents 4% of market volume. Big pat on the back to everyone for helping to ban an optional order type that helps retail investors by offering price improvement and reduced execution costs.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:22 | 24204 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

BAN on FLASH TRADING IMMINENT---
(No WONDER Lloyd Blankfein is asking his secretary to hold off purchasing the GulfStream and second house in the Hamptons)...(The JIG is up)!!

http://www.cnbc.com/id/32284889

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:26 | 24214 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

blankfein was going to purchase that gulfstream so he can make a break for it, when the stuff hits the fan. trouble is , he won't make it out of town. he will be stopped somewhere along the line by the angry mob, dragged out by the big nose and beaten severely about the head and shoulders with rolled up newspapers.....

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:58 | 24589 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

We can do without the CNBC links thank you.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:30 | 24219 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Schapiro said any proposal to ban the transactions would require approval from SEC commissioners.

Ain't gonna hapen.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:33 | 24226 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

About Lloyd's request to lay low. I hope I had some influence..

A few sundays ago coming back from work in my town in Jerzy - I had this dumbass in a ferrari that could not even handle his triptonic cut me off. I'm driving my 15 yr old camaro that is stick & I'm still using my original clutch.

Idiot ferrari boy pull next to me & lower his windows and gives me a grin. I shoot back "You wall street boy better enjoy your money, before the revolution starts" - He gave me a nervous laughter & said he was not wall street...

You see boys intimidation is a great thing when you deal with loud annoying richsterss..

There is a reason wealthy people in other countries lie low..

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:34 | 24231 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

"A proposal to eliminate the orders would still have to be approved by the entire commission and be open to public comment before being implemented."

Yawn and how long will THAT take... in the meantime all is the same and they frontrun orders

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:39 | 24372 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Exactly. It's high profile news so they gotta look like they're doing something until the herd moves on to something else.

I hear that the CFTC and the FSA in England are 'investigating' commodities speculation too :)

Lucky for all of them the pitchfork crowd has a short attention span. Either that, or there's so many shenanigans that are fleecing the little guy that it's impossible to keep on top of them all.

Anyway, we all know who wins.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:35 | 24236 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I am about 10% net worth in gold coins. how far do you go with this? gold could go to 500. but the currency could also massively depresiate. despite all the blogin... no solutions.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:43 | 24260 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Damn Tyler-- I love your freaking site. It is a refuge of truth and reason in a world of lies, fraud and more lies!!

Most people with half a brain are more convinced than ever that the MSM exists 90% as paid shills to keep pushing the fraudulent agendas of their parent Companies... CNBC seriously wonders why their viewership is down ALMOST 30%??

The masses are TIRED OF THE LIES!!!!!

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:45 | 24266 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Oh Darn it anyway. Guess this means I will have to post-pone the Gulfstream purchase.

Bob, The Goldman Mailroom guy

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:54 | 24290 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Why don't they ban it now like they did when the banks were having problems and banning new shorts just like that.

But oh no, because GS is making a mint got to go the slooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow way about it

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 13:59 | 24301 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Goldman should be going down like Madoff.

Call in the Swat Teams.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:11 | 24320 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

If GS front run orders by using flash, then they should give all that profit to the US people

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:17 | 24331 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The new GOLDMAN Modus Operandi--

"STEALTH WEALTH".....

"Shhhhhh......It's OK to steal from the Taxpayers, just make sure you don't SHOW them you are doing it"!!!!

(HAAAAAAAAAAAAA Wow Lloyd- you just suck at this PR thang, you REALLY DO.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/32284889

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:55 | 24578 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

WE DON'T CLICK ON CNBC LINKS HERE, THANK YOU VERY LITTLE.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:27 | 24347 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

No, they are not nervous because the real problem is not flash trading, but what happens right before the news, which is insider trading. It happens in futures all the frigging time. Flash trading is a scapegoat to hide the real crimes.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:50 | 24399 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I blogged about GGC a week ago, It was in my list of "failed" companies along with likes of PEIX, CTHR and so on...Look at how these basturds are making shorts to cover forcefully and creating a bubble...I just hope that the doomsday is in sight.

Dow at 20 points will be short of giving me pleasure and to see the banksters on kneels begging for food will make the day.

People are not even warmedup for talking about Proj. Mayhem yet, and many week apples are talking about victory after the flash order ban.

TD, wake the people up, set targets please. People are very naive and need a lot of leadership and spoon feeding.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:22 | 24483 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

"People are very naive and need a lot of leadership and spoon feeding."

Sounds like brainwashing.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 14:55 | 24409 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

You're trying to attribute a lower market to a potential flash order ban? Seriously???

Flash orders, liquidity, spreads (and even profits at Goldman Sachs) have only a weak, if any, relationship to the valuation of the market.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:14 | 24464 Ando
Ando's picture

Not sure why everyone assumes all GS trading gains are from flash orders.  You cant even be sure that they use them at all.  And NYSE doesnt have that capability.  But anyway thanks for the short squeeze that zero hedge caused today in GS and NYX. lolool

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 15:34 | 24523 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

"Christopher Nagy, managing director for order routing, sales and strategy at TD Ameritrade, said his firm's experience with Direct Edge's flash orders has been positive. Ameritrade began using Direct Edge's ELP program when it started in 2006. "We saw that clients were getting great executions on limit orders, and a more consistent execution experience, so we continued utilizing the program," he said.

For investors, Nagy continued, flash orders avoid slippage concerns associated with displayed orders. "Reg NMS doesn't incentivize retail or institutional orders to display their hands for fear of slippage," he said. "If you can enter a transparent environment but essentially be hidden, you're more apt to transact in that world." He added that Ameritrade usually receives better prices than the NBBO on Direct Edge."

from: http://www.tradersmagazine.com/issues/20_296/-103978-1.html?pg=1

It's a good piece of journalism, looking at both sides of the Flash order controversy.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 16:40 | 24701 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

GS don't make that much from equities trading, let alone HFT.

So even banning it completely won't make a huuuge difference to the bottom line.

Tue, 08/04/2009 - 17:32 | 24792 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I love your stuff tyler, but the level of discourse leaves something to be desired. Much better commentray on seeking alpha to your posts. It's clear some of the folks here know their sh.., but prefer to talk trash instead of making a point and educating.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!