This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Wikileaks Latest: The USA As An Exporter Of Terrorism?
The latest release by Wikileaks, this time focusing on tha CIA, asks what happens if its understood that the US is an exporter of terrorism:
This CIA "Red Cell" report from February 2, 2010, looks at what will
happen if it is internationally understood that the United States is an
exporter of terrorism; 'Contrary to common belief, the American export
of terrorism or terrorists is not a recent phenomenon, nor has it been
associated only with Islamic radicals or people of Middle Eastern,
African or South Asian ethnic origin. This dynamic belies the American
belief that our free, open and integrated multicultural society lessens
the allure of radicalism and terrorism for US citizens.' The report
looks at a number cases of US exported terrorism, including attacks by
US based or financed Jewish, Muslim and Irish-nationalism terrorists. It
concludes that foreign perceptions of the US as an "Exporter of
Terrorism" together with US double standards in international law, may
lead to noncooperation in renditions (including the arrest of CIA
officers) and the decision to not share terrorism related intelligence
with the United States.
(Source)
Full report (pdf):
»
- 10166 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
US an exporter of terrorism? Wasn't this common knowledge 50+ years ago?
Common knowledge, but to a limited audience of those no longer living in the "American Dream". Hopefully this will wake up a few more out there to the realities of the freeestesst country in the world.
I ain't holding my breath though.
Ask Bill Wattenberg asshole
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEuieb76N_E
If I could watch YouTube from work I might be able to comment. Not sure if asshole is an insult or sarcasm or possibly related to the video. So thank you?
If your bible is wikileaks and your prophet is Alex Jones then you are a hopeless douche bag.
Your response is a typical ad hominem attack from someone who would rather embrace fear rather than facts. 1. Our 16 US intelligence agencies all conclude that Iran is not seeking a nuclear bomb. 2. The IAEA has stated over and over that Iran does not possess the technology for a nuclear bomb. Iran signed onto the Non proliferation treaty and have adhered to all points of the treaty, while your probably favorite country, Israel, has not. By the way, our country is not supposed to send any aid to a nuclear power that has not followed and signed onto the non-proliferation treaty. 3. Iran has allowed inspectors into their nuclear facilities time and time again. 4. The non-deferment treaty Iran signed onto and the resultant inspections conclude that no enriched uranium is unaccounted for or being deferred to any other program other than energy needs for light water nuclear reactor activity. 5. Iran's light-water nuclear reactors (the same technology Clinton and Bush II gave N. Korea) are not capable of enriching uranium beyond 3.5% (96% enrichment is needed for nuclear bomb). 6. Iran cannot even refine its own oil into gasoline let alone possess a delivery device for said nuclear bomb even if they could product one. If you believe Iran hates us because we are free and want to destroy us because of our freedom you have missed the results of Iraq. Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea, the US support of the Mujahidin in Iran to help take out the Soviets, the US support of Saddam in order to take out Iran, and the US support of Osama bin Laden to fight the soviets. You also miss the fact our military now conducts business with autocratic dictatorships in the form of military weapon deals and aid. If this is not exporting terrorism, I don't know what is. Back to your personal attack at my comment and me, Wikileaks is not my bible and Alex Jones is no prophet. I prefer facts to attacks unrelated to the conversation, but then again you show signs of being a neocon, so it explains your position.
Weapons-grade uranium is enriched to 90%...
The Iranian, Brazilian, and Turkish foreign ministers signed an agreement on Monday on the exchange of low-enriched uranium to fuel Tehran's scientific research reactor, AFP reported.
Earlier on Monday, an Iranian Foreign Ministry official representative said that Tehran had agreed to swap in Turkey most of its 3.5%-enriched uranium for 20%-enriched fuel for use in its Tehran scientific research reactor.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast said some 1,200 kilograms of Iran's low-enriched uranium will be swapped.
Arabic media reported that Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, his Iranian counterpart, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan met on Monday in Iran's capital to complete the agreement, and after 18 hours of talks the foreign ministers of the three countries agreed on the exchange.
what about this fact ? All of these coutries supported the US in Iraq. So all of these countries are "exporters of terror" too ?
United Kingdom
Spain
Portugal
Denmark
Netherlands
Iceland
Italy
Baltic States:
Estonia #
Latvia #
Lithuania #
Central Europe:
Poland
Czech Republic
Slovakia #
Hungary
Balkans:
Albania #
Macedonia #
Romania #
Bulgaria #
Turkey
Croatia #
Slovenia #
Eastern Europe
Ukraine
Japan
South Korea
Singapore
Philippines
Afghanistan
Azerbaijan
Uzbekistan
Georgia
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
Solomon Islands
Mongolia
Palau
Tonga
El Salvador
Colombia
Nicaragua
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
Honduras
Australia
Middle East:
Kuwait
Africa:
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Uganda
Rwanda
Angola
SupportED, past tense. How many of those countries are left with a cat in the fight? Of the countries left, how many soldiers did they send into battle?
You are missing the point O' gobbler of cocks. Our foreign policy creates our enemies. Take some time to pull the cock from your mouth and listen to Micheal Chertoff explained as what OSL stated were the reasons for 9/11. It had nothing to do with our "freedoms", but with our support for Israel, our killing of innocents in the name of democracy, and the fact the we fucked him over after OBL helped to defeat the Russians. As the Kurds about our giving Saddam weaponized gas and how that went for them.
You argue from a moral equivalency standpoint that since a group of muslim extremists created ground zero, then we have the responsibility to create ground zeros everywhere.
Go back to your neocon talking points and fuck yourself in your mangina.
I cant wait til China is the worlds superpower. When they get their muslim 9/11 attack, China will make a parking lot out of the whole middle east.
Then the PC bleeding heart muslim appologists will be begging for George Bush back.
This is really Richard Clarke, isn't it?
You're the clown that wrote that book warning about cyber terrorism with China, after your sorry ass worked for both the Clinton Administration -- which transferred the most advanced military tech to China -- and the Bush Administration -- which transferred the most advanced military tech to China?
So after Corporate AmeriKa's transferring all the advanced technology and jobs to China, you're their main booster, right?
And what part of two-digit IQ don't you understand?
what part did richard clarke play in supervising exports to china? my recollection is he was more concerned about the threat from bin laden (and china) than most in either, particularly the bush, administration. you're a lot close with 'corporate amerika' as the malefactor in transfers of sensitive technology.
will be begging for George Bush back.
Bring in the butterfly nets, he's gone off the deep end. Way off the deep end.
I love stupid people - it's so much fun throwing facts in their face
"Coalition members that never participated in ground operations
The original list of coalition members provided by the White House ([7])included many nations that had no intention to participate in any actual fighting. Many of them do not even have an army, such as Marshall islands, Micronesia and Palau. The government of one country, Solomon Islands, listed by the White House as a member of the coalition was apparently unaware of any such membership. In fact, they promptly denied it.[114]
"
wikipedia.org
Bingo, bango, boingo.
You gotta get up like this and, badda-bing, you blow their brains all over your nice Ivy League suit.
Nice work today, Doc.
His ignorance is mind-numbing and to ignore it would not make sense in the fight club.
The scary thing is that there are more like him out there, lurking in the shadows. They happen to hold the keys to the Democrat and Republican leadership too, alongwith CNN, MSNBC, FOX, ABC News, etc.
The funny thing is this guy probably thinks I'm a liberal.
The funny thing is this guy probably thinks I'm a liberal.
The people on Team Red and Team Blue don't seem to think that anyone else is on the field.
I have that issue with another website that I have long since abandoned. The site is mostly Team Blue or Team Red.
Try arguing something and you'll be penciled in as a liberal. Or a conservative.
In fact, one week I was a right-wing radical, the next a left-wing nutcase.
Not much different a concept than "when all you have is a hammer, then everything looks like a nail".
When you've been conditioned to think that the only ideas are either conservative or liberal, democrat or republican, then you're going to do your damnedest to pound any odd shaped peg into either the square hole or the round hole.
It's ideological subversion and they're the victims of it. I almost feel pity for the poor brainwashed little bastards. I really almost do.
me too. almost.
Well done.
no you are one of those conspiracy believing, bleeding heart, anti American, muslim apologist hacks.
Dude.....Settle. Your coming hard outta the chute for no reason.
It is quite possible to critique your country and still love it. It no less patriotic than following it blindly. Perhaps less so.
There is a difference between a liberal and a MSNBC sheep. The world still needs some liberals.
Slow down, my man. There is spittle on the inside of my monitor. Frothing at the mouth is not dialogue.
No. Since it would hurt your brain too much to actually read what he wrote and understand it, you choose to classify him. It is a lot easier, but also just plain ignorant.
The jewdar is blinking red.
Ya but those marshall island dudes just rock when it comes to deep sea well oversight.
Sponsors of the exportation of terror
You're missing the point: the CIA have been exporting terrorism for years. As far as I know, the CIA does not originate in any of the countries you have listed above.
Not to mention Norway, who's trippled its production of bullets & bombs in the first half of 2010.....
"supported" ? hardly, coerced would be a better word.
pussy politicians going against the wills of their people for whatever motives they had for pandering to the US' ongoing shit.
Hi doggins, I know it is tough to be exposed to the truth, but do you really think that the US stays on top by obeying all the rules?
Strawman.
Japan didn't fire a single bullet in Iraq.
U.S. killed thousands.
That is what makes Team America seen as a leading exporter of terrorism.
Don't forget Mahmoud Ahmadinejad thinks hes been sent by God to destroy Israel. Ever notice how people from that side of the world act under the assumption they are pleasing God.
<slaps forehead>
How could I have been so stupid? I never saw it that way. All I ever see is the US and British (not the total count BTW) leadership asking for God's guidance and blessing as they send in the cruise missiles and bombers. And don't forget the frequent evocations to God (of various denominations of course) and their priesthood for help and guidance as they release wave after wave of political propaganda to whip the citizenship into a war frenzy.
How could I have missed the Muslim thingy?
Hey, thats ummmmmmmm, bullshit. Did you not see those mobile weapons lab's Powell showed the UN. DID YOU not hear about Sadam's links to Al-Qaeda.... Ya Al-Qaeda, those bastards from,ummmmm,from.... Well they are all over and we HAVE to hunt them down!!!
Are you on high?
No, I'm joking ....
We should not be in Iraq or in the mid-east if you ask me.
Nevermind. Misread you Smales. Sorry.
Wow. He never heard of OUR Pledge of Allegiance, or else he would have realized that the USA is the "One nation, under God"
Lol ... Yeah, Christmas trees are no longer allowed at the White House, only Menorahs.
the USA is the "One nation, under God"
I really wish God would learn to take a look before he plops himself down on the sofa. First it was the cat and now, this...
A large chunk of the founding fathers were deists not god (Abraham) worshipers.
For the US to keep spending an incredible amount of money on weapons systems, it needs to have credible enemies. Japan, Germany, China, Italy, and The Soviets are either all our friends now, or no longer enemies. The world has been running out of enemies for quite a while now. Now enemies have to be carefully cultivated and nurtured. Things have really changed.
Yeah I have heard this before.
9/11 was a fake attack by fake enemies to start fake wars.
Everyone loves the good ol US of A so much that they don't havew any enemies.
If the Iraq war was so fake then why did UN resolution 1441 get a 15-0 vote ?
United Nations Security Council on November 8, 2002, offering Iraq under Saddam Hussein "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations" that had been set out in several previous resolutions (Resolution 660, Resolution 661, Resolution 678, Resolution 686, Resolution 687, Resolution 688, Resolution 707, Resolution 715, Resolution 986, and Resolution 1284). [1]
On November 8, 2002, the Security Council passed Resolution 1441 by a unanimous 15-0 vote; Russia, China, France, and Arab countries such as Syria voted in favor, giving Resolution 1441 wider support than even the 1990 Gulf War resolution.
It wasn't common knowledge 2002 that CIA operatives pulled those buildings. The vote was based on ridicuolous, planted reports by the same about Iraqs possesion WMD's. Don't think Syria or anyone else wanted to end up like Iraq.
If you search for truth from the UN, good luck to you.
If the US could pull off a 9/11 style attack then why counld't they just plant some WDS in Iraq so they would not look like idiots for not finding them ?
Why didn't they just sneak some WDS across the border and say "aha, we found them!" ?
If Saddam was so innocent, then why didnt he comply with UN weapons inspectors ?
why bother planting WMD in Iraq when you can just lie to the people about what has been found?
Bush Admin. Knew Trailers Weren’t WMD Threat
On May 29, 2003, 50 days after the fall of Baghdad, President Bush proclaimed a fresh victory for his administration in Iraq: Two small trailers captured by U.S. and Kurdish troops had turned out to be long-sought mobile “biological laboratories.” He declared, “We have found the weapons of mass destruction.”
A secret fact-finding mission to Iraq — not made public until now — had already concluded that the trailers had nothing to do with biological weapons. Leaders of the Pentagon-sponsored mission transmitted their unanimous findings to Washington in a field report on May 27, 2003, two days before the president’s statement.
“There was no connection to anything biological,” said one expert who studied the trailers. Another recalled an epithet that came to be associated with the trailers: “the biggest sand toilets in the world.”
Well we had to roll our boys' into Iraq to level the fucking place. That way Halliburton,Betchel ect. get to rebuild the infrastructure.
If Haliburton is such power house then why don't you go mortgage your house to buy HAL stock ?
I pulled my meager investments out of the market on the day Gulf War II started. I didn't own any Halliburton, of course, but I expected the market to rally from that point (as it did) and I want no part of blood money.
"If the US could pull off a 9/11 style attack then why counld't they just plant some WDS in Iraq so they would not look like idiots for not finding them .."
If you ever climbed out of your hole and happened to ever read the international news, you would have known that back a few years in that timeframe, a CIA counter-weapons proliferation operation by the name of Brewster Jennings (which had a supervisor by name of Valerie Plame) happened to intercept a shipment of VX gas being smuggled over the Turkish border into Iraq.
During their investigation to track the originating point of said VX gas (a weapon of mass destruction, BTW), they had gotten to the USA when US government officials (as in Ari Fleischer, Scooter Libby and Richard Armitage) subverted their investigation by exposing the covert ID of Valerie Plame, which completely compromised the Brewster Jennings operation (and murdered that op's human assets).
Pay attention, two-digit IQ boy....
Thanks Sarge. I recalled something along those lines but didn't think Spitz was worth the effort of looking it up. Still I'm glad that somebody did.
+100!
"Two digit IQ Boy".
Classic. You did mean binary, didn't you?
If memory serves wasn't it Special Envoy, Donald Rumsfeld that went to Baghdad in 1983 and or 5 to offer wide ranging assistance to the Iraqi government led by Saddam Hussein? Part of this potential assistance is discussed in this golden oldie from the Old Grey Lady before she got trafficked and forced to wear clear heels and a pastel micro mini.
WASHINGTON, Aug. 17 — A covert American program during the Reagan administration provided Iraq with critical battle planning assistance at a time when American intelligence agencies knew that Iraqi commanders would employ chemical weapons in waging the decisive battles of the Iran-Iraq war, according to senior military officers with direct knowledge of the program.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/18/international/middleeast/18CHEM.html?s...
Ot this one for that bastion of liberal bias, The St. Petersburg Times.
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/03/16/Perspective/How_Iraq_built_its_we.shtml
Also between 1985 and 1989, the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control sent Iraq 14 agents "with biological warfare significance," including West Nile virus, according to Riegle's investigators.
So, in essence didn't the US provide critical assistance to the Iraqi government with the development and deployment of WMD?
WDS. What does that stand for, Womanizing Dumbshit like Spitzer?
How come we don't attack Israel for violating over 60 UN resolutions?
I think its because they run our banking system.
Now just because Steny Hoyer's sister was the director of AIPAC for a couple of years is no reason to jump to conclusions.....
Good to see your showing your real side. Blame the Jews you Nazi.
It was a joke,easy...
So fast to run behind "Blame the Jew's" & "Nazi".
Wow, that was fast.
Gee ... the typical defense. Everyone who provides facts is "antisemetic".
There once was a time when people would be taken in and feel guilty about providing facts that made Israelis look bad. Now it is clear that claim of antisemetism is an obvious personal attack on honest character. The antisemite claims are seen as a despicable and pathetic attempt to polarize people.
Try dealing with the facts instead of trying to deflect through old no longer effective polarizing tactics.
If you want to do something useful for the world, STOP the polarizing talk and talk about how all people can be drawn together to fight those that want to polarize us.
If muslims building a mega victory mosque on ground zero is not polarizing then I dont know what is.
Where do Nazis stand on Islam ? There seems to be allot of people here qualified to answer.
The Ba'ath party in Iraq (Saddam's), was built upon the Nazi's ideology.
We wouldn't want to take him out then would we ?....
Ya, I just wish we could have done this with (Navy Seal Team 6).And not be park'd in Iraq for the next 50 years. A friend of mine used to run a squad of seals in Afghanistan, said the military bases we are building will be occupied for a very,very long time.
Oh geez, this is one of those half-witted, pay-for-post types from either Peterson's AmericaSpeaks, or the Koch Bros. astroturf outfits.
Please ignore spitzer's rants.....
I was waiting for someone to say it.
It isn't even the content or the position -- it is the Johnny-Bravo-pitbull-style getting @#$%^& huffy with everyone. It seems familiar. There's probably a textbook.
Victory mosque???
ROFLMFAO!!!!!!
Holy shit, that's funny!!!!
Why the hell can't you people stay on topic, instead of pursuing mindless possible conspiracy theories and ad hominem attacks? FWIW, the classified document outed by Wikileaks is a classic example of over-classification if I've ever seen one. ALL of the information is available online; only the "analysis" could potentially be a problem. But the "analysis" is so bloody puerile that your average (home-schooled or private-schooled) 8th grader could have done it. And as such, opinions of this ilk have also been seen online, but admittedly without the Agency's imprimatur. The Agency is likely reaming every asshole who has/had access to that item, including the drafter, but it's a tempest in a teapot, IMHO. Utter nonsense. And I'm sure the leaker knew it.
The obvious other possibility, aside from sheer counterfeit (the latter is a strong possibility) is that this was a determined leak--perhaps to get Wikileaks in more trouble, as well as misdirect attention from what else is going down. Come on, people, THINK!
The mosque on Ground Zero thing was a CFR/NWO op to whip up hate of Muslims.
http://newsbuster.com/Pages/content/meet-the-globalists-behind-the-ground-zero-mosque-imam.html
antisemetic - the new 'racist'
not that new.
not that new.
But the Jews do get involved in a lot of dirty shit ...
The affair began as an operation to improve U.S.-Iranian relations. It was planned that Israel would ship weapons to a relatively moderate, politically influential group of Iranians, and then the U.S. would resupply Israel and receive the Israeli payment. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of six U.S. hostages, who were being held by the Lebanese Shia Islamist group Hezbollah, who in turn were unknowingly connected to the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution. The plan deteriorated into an arms-for-hostages scheme, in which members of the executive branch sold weapons to Iran in exchange for the release of the American hostages.[3][4] Large modifications to the plan were devised by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council in late 1985, in which a portion of the proceeds from the weapon sales was diverted to fund anti-Sandinista and anti-communist rebels, or Contras, in Nicaragua.[5]
Excellent backgrounder, Spalding_Smailes, but let us not forget the origins of Afghanistan's troubles and the American intervention:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html
Moving Wahabist extremists to Afghanistan's northern border was the causal factor, directly attributed to Brzezinski, Carter then later Reagan.
Ahhhhhhh, your right, Brzezinski I almost forgot.
That pile of fucking garbage.
Notice that I stated Israel and not the Jews. Fucking moron. RACIST!!!! RACIST!!!! Your arguments are as predictable as my shit schedule. I am part Austrian Jew. My great-grandparents left austria because of Hitler you fuck.
This is about islamic terrorism and the US.
YOU are the one who brought Israel into the dicussion, not me.
fukckin nazi.....hawhaw
By your replies you have totally discredited yourself. No facts to back up your argument so you revert to name calling and obfuscation of facts.
On November 8, 2002, the Security Council passed Resolution 1441 by a unanimous 15-0 vote; Russia, China, France, and Arab countries such as Syria voted in favor, giving Resolution 1441 wider support than even the 1990 Gulf War resolution.
While some politicians have argued that the resolution could authorize war under certain circumstances, the representatives in the meeting were clear that this was not the case. The ambassador for the United States, John Negroponte, said:
“ [T]his resolution contains no "hidden triggers" and no "automaticity" with respect to the use of force. If there is a further Iraqi breach, reported to the Council by UNMOVIC, the IAEA or a Member State, the matter will return to the Council for discussions as required in paragraph 12. The resolution makes clear that any Iraqi failure to comply is unacceptable and that Iraq must be disarmed. And, one way or another, Iraq will be disarmed. If the Security Council fails to act decisively in the event of further Iraqi violations, this resolution does not constrain any Member State from acting to defend itself against the threat posed by Iraq or to enforce relevant United Nations resolutions and protect world peace and security.[2] ”The ambassador for the United Kingdom, the co-sponsor of the resolution, said:
“ We heard loud and clear during the negotiations the concerns about "automaticity" and "hidden triggers" -- the concern that on a decision so crucial we should not rush into military action; that on a decision so crucial any Iraqi violations should be discussed by the Council. Let me be equally clear in response... There is no "automaticity" in this resolution. If there is a further Iraqi breach of its disarmament obligations, the matter will return to the Council for discussion as required in paragraph 12. We would expect the Security Council then to meet its responsibilities.[3] ”The message was further confirmed by the ambassador for Syria:
“ Syria voted in favour of the resolution, having received reassurances from its sponsors, the United States of America and the United Kingdom, and from France and Russia through high-level contacts, that it would not be used as a pretext for striking against Iraq and does not constitute a basis for any automatic strikes against Iraq. The resolution should not be interpreted, through certain paragraphs, as authorizing any State to use force. It reaffirms the central role of the Security Council in addressing all phases of the Iraqi issue.[4]In the leadup to the meeting, it became apparent that a majority of UNSC members would oppose any resolution leading to war. As a result, no such resolution was put to the Council.
fixed that for you, jackass.
Proof that the Spelling Police can have real value.
Blame the Jews you Nazi.
WW2 150,000 Jewish Soldiers Served Hitler and the Nazishttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcDpptCdYY0
Wow...
You learn something new every day.
Been playing around on Ancestry.com today ?
cough...zionists...you know the original 20th century terrorist organization.
Skippy....Jews got nothin to do with it.
Your presumption that a UN resolution against Israel is actually anywhere near valid and not pure propoganda is a farse. Your name fits you perfectly, dickhead.
Good thing we disarmed all those WMDs, huh!
I see, so whatever the United Nations, the IMF and the World Bank says and does is gospel?
Well, sure glad I got the memo....
What if ya decide to throw a war and nobody shows up?
It still makes a sound.
this is kinda funny what the chinese people will endure and let the people's republic die in their cars without shade or food. all trucks carrying food no refrigeration. this sounds like the worst kind of death.
News for china highway gridlock for days » Nine days of gridlock in China is expected to continue until mid ... Aug 24, 2010 ... For the last 9 days passengers have been sitting in gridlock on the National Expressway 110, the main highway leading to Beijing. ... No user commented in " Nine days of gridlock in China is expected to continue until ...What's wrong with Wikileaks?
They got about 200,000 heavily armed psychopaths on their back.
Common knowledge for those who read. Anyone read Legacy of Ashes? pretty compelling link between CIA actions in Iran and the foundation of King-Douche's (a.k.a. Osama) ability to get a foothold in afghanestan.
Excellent suggestion, KawKaw, and please add to that:
Bleeding Afghanistan, by Sonali Kolhatkar
The Eagle and the Lion: The Tragedy of American-Iranian Relations, by James A. Bill
And again, this is an excellent interview and most enlightening:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html
And in other news, the CIA supports international drug trafficking.
Drugs are worth a great deal of money. If the CIA is not supporting drug cultivation, then banks are. http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=3023425
They admit that the illegal money from drugs within the USA helps in part to save the banking system during the recent crisis. This is FACT!
PS: What about American terrorism labelled as "Freedom Fighters"?
marijuana has long been amrka's #1 cash crop, even over HighFructoseGMOCorn.
http://www.drugscience.org/Archive/bcr2/cashcrops.html
that cash is part of the shadow economy that supports this nationstate farce - add meth cookers, etc. etc. - ya got a great ole country here, yeah. . . and then add the CIA & their cocaine ring(s), the pentagon & opium. . .
oh my, what a hellish farce.
damn good #1 crop for the people, weed bitches†
So! You are suggesting that when Bush #1 invaded Panama when their cocaine processing was going down, and after his invasion, the cocaine processing reached previous high levels, it wasn't just a coincidence?
So! You are suggesting that when those American banks financially supported the passage of NAFTA after the drug cartels began laundering their money in Mexican banks with the upgrade in the bank reporting act, and then immediately rushed in to purchase those Mexican banks for that lucrative drug cartel money laundering operations, it wasn't just coincidence?
Hmmmmm...thought as much!
(In Mother Russia, drugs use you.)
Listen to this from Catherine Austin Fitts on the economics of drug dealing 9among many topics).
#1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u12GGRzeCwY&feature=related
#2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fU-Ram9cRI&feature=related
#3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPyREdqb03g&feature=related
#4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y60SviT3sFM&feature=related
#5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a50cRiluDXY
You're trying to distinquish the CIA from the banking system. They are the same group.
Yeah, well, there are only three "REAL" currencies on the planet.
1) Gold
2) Oil
3) Drugs
And when they can get away with it.
Confuse em and use em. It's the biggest currency of all.
Fuck you
This Wiki leaks geek is a rapist pedophile.
Now we see why those "charges" were deliberately "leaked". It was done to give more ammunition to the various black ops programs and paid trolls to help disrupt and demoralize.
After all, the government would never charge anyone unless they had evidence, right?
I don't think he's paid troll but his views are affected by his background.
Agreed. Not a paid troll, because he'd have a little more tact. But a moron for sure.
google assange soros.
Please dont tell me you pointed me to Gerald Celente!
Google Gerald Celente RT
CD, I could not help but think of your piece regarding the courage to speak up and the network effect that it inspires. ABC News ran a hidden video show depicting blind people being taken advantage of and people stealing at a crowded open house. In both incidents one person courageously spoke up and called the person out for cheating and then everyone jumped on board. It was similar to your friend's city council experience demonstrating safety and courage in numbers only after a true brave soul decides to take on the status quo and do what is right.
Cheers,
Pigpen
Oh yeah, lets have anarchy, lets show the world every classified document we can possibly find.
Lets kick the United States around and make the terrorists feel good, hell, lets help the terrorist cause.
Lets build mosques on ground zero.
Got any other good ideas ?
Yea , take a deep breath and a time out perhaps.
Turn off Rush Limbaugh, he's frying your brain with BS propaganda.
No, Limbaugh may be simplistically conservative, but would never condone the behaviour we're seeing right now.
You may disagree with Limbaugh, he may skew the truth to his advantage in order to make a three hour monologue fly, but he is no Spitzer.
He at least will give you an honest to goodness debate.
I believe you may be on the right track there, Colonel. I wonder what childhood trauma caused Spitzer to be so vitriolic? Kinda reminds me of ole Johnny Bravo -- except less polite.
Their tactics were learned in the same manner...
It is all about tiring people out. The more emotional directions it can be taken the better -- whip up all sorts of indignance and confrontation. Then start swerving.
i agree† d i c k
I don't know about mosques but I do think that Assange is an honest and principled man. He has thought deeply about our world and concluded that his approach to freedom of (almost all) information is in the interests of democracy and peace.
If only we had more people with his selfless dedication in this world
If only we had more people with his selfless dedication in this world
If what were required here was a "selfless" act then Julian Assange need not have done a thing, the documents would have leaked themselves. But any act does require and actor -- a self -- to commit the act.
Assange does not do what he does because he considers only the well being of others and takes no consideration of himself. He does these things because the unique individual that he is finds satisfaction in the work and because the talents that he himself possesses allows him to do so.
The concept of the "selfless" act is a con game promoted by powerful people who convince others to do things which are against their own interest and against their own will.
One denigrates Assange or any other individual who achieves remarkable things by calling their efforts "selfless" acts. Assange -- himself -- deserves great praise.
no he is an anti American faggot.
You are the most anti-American poster on this thread. You cheer while Lady Liberty goes down in flames. Would "fuck you" be too strong a salutation?
what are you a muslim, does your wife wear the burka ?
sure some rags heads have lost some liberty, tell someone who cares. Their loss is my gain.
Look Dude, as far as I'm concerned, the wikileaks dude can pour gas on himself and light it. I don't give a fuck. You sir, need to have your medications adjusted.
Come back when you sober up.
No the anti Americans are running Wall st and DC right now and getting the sons and daughters of America killed or permanently modified.
and you are a butt munching idiot. Take your drama somewhere else, please.
And if he happens to become wondrously famous, and celebrated by every anti-American faction out there, that's just icing on the principled cake.
Shit, you probably thought the same thing about Yasir Arafat.
You probably had a party when the USS Liberty was attacked.
Per your suggestedion: Another good idea.
How about our government, CIA and banks simply not do things that they would be ashamed or afraid of people learning about.
If their actions cannot stand the light of day, then they should not be doing it.
I think it's a little bit "Skittles and unicorn piss" to think that we can have an intelligence service that operates under standards approved by the Girl Scouts of America.
lol thats a good one, seriously. I will remember that when I am debating bleeding heart muslim apologists and Nazis.
I finally nailed this sucker (had to call up three buds to arrange a group pinging ope):
It's Richard Perle over at American Friends of Bilderberg, Inc.
Got you, mofo! (At first I though it was either Carly (Carleton) Fiorina or Hank Greenberg because it was close to a number of the Business Executives for National Security!
Greenberg's second MVP season in 1940 was pretty impressive. Check out the OPS some time....
Cognitive Dissonance
Look at what GM tried to do to Nader.
Lucky Assange isn't dead.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/oct/22/uselections2004.usa
"For years it was Ralph Nader against General Motors, who went so far as to hire private detectives to discredit him. They sent a prostitute to try to seduce him at a food counter at Safeway's but he turned her away. So the gumshoes tried to prove he was homosexual but were caught as they tried to follow him into Congress. The scandal made Mr Nader into a hero overnight. The car makers were forced to introduce seat belts, and ultimately air bags."
Hey! Don't forget those cretins over at the FBi and their phony op on Scott Ritter (they slandered and libeled him as a pedophile).
The judge immediately threw out the feebs' case and officially rebuked them as a bunch of illegitimate s**theads.
Just ask Blago-
Is that all you know , pedophile ?
the Guy is charged then half day later charges were dropped. The reason is there is no proof that he is guilty.
The Pentagon and CIA is trying to charge him with imaginary crimes so that American people can think this site cannot be trusted.
And you took the bite.
But if you dig deeper into the news you will see that the prosecutor who charged him is now investigated and they are trying to punish/ban her because she didn't have any proof but charged this guy.
This is a dirty tactic but you are buying it.
Investigation into allegations of "molestation" is still continuing. As part of this investigation, an official spokeswoman said, Swedish authorities will now seek to conduct an official interrogation of Assange.
Borgstrom said that he was dissatisfied with the prosecutor’s decision to terminate the rape investigation, and that he was likely to appeal this decision to a higher-ranking prosecutor as early as Thursday. Rosander confirmed that there is a legal procedure available for such an appeal. Borgstrom said that in his personal opinion, there was “more than enough” evidence in the case for authorities to continue to investigate Assange.
Your facts are right except you missed to point out that instead of facing 5 years in prison maximum sentence if found guilty is a 1000 USD fine. You don't really know what you are talking about, do you?
I suppose that the Swedish government even has the responsibility to investigate blatantly false claims. How can they prove false claims are flase if there is no investigation.
Face it, the CIA, US government and banks have completely lost credibility because they cannot be trusted and someone as Assange is now more trusted than any of the above corrupt organizations.
The CIA whores and shills can whine, complain and imply "whatever", trying to twist the truth, but no one with half an ounce of intelligence believes them. They have no credibility. They lost it after years of abusing the trust of the people.
It has all the hallmarks of a professional operation as they waited to make their allegations when the chief prosecutor, Eva Fini was off-duty, and as it was the beginning of a weekend, the junior and highly inexperienced prosecutor on duty immediately issued a warrant as the person charged (Mr. Assange) was a foreign national and she didn't want him leaving the country.
The chief prosecutor, upon reviewing the facts, immediately rescinded that warrant.
(Glad somebody here speaks Swedish!)
Am looking forward to that movie on the Valerie Plame affair, with Naomi Watts playing Ms. Plame (loved Naomi in "The International" - she underplayed it perfectly!)
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/05/21/ripped-from-the-headlines.html
http://www.imdb.com/video/imdb/vi3772581401/
cbaba
Dude, planting Kiddie porn is the new Gay to TPTB.
They knocked Scott Ritter down (but not out) with a similar scheme.
You're a politicians wet dream. Play you like a fiddle Spitz.
Spitzer is the new Bravo.
Red Team, bitches!