Wikileaks: US Forces Yards Away From Osama In 2008

Tyler Durden's picture




 
0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:30 | 1234782 66Sexy
66Sexy's picture

Bullshit propaganda via gov controlled wikileaks.

WTB moar dual party paradigm controlled opposition tactics (yawn).

NEWSFLASH: Some parts of the population are capable of critical thinking. I guess you can still 'fool some of the people some of the time'.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:50 | 1234917 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

How does news of  a three year old near miss help the government?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:56 | 1234952 Alex Kintner
Alex Kintner's picture

Ha ha. They can pin the near miss on Bush.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:58 | 1234978 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

So you believe that Assange is working specifically for Obama and the democrats and not the US government at large or the military-industrial complex or Mossad?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:02 | 1235000 Alex Kintner
Alex Kintner's picture

No, I was joking. Assange works for Assange IMO. I'm Pro-Wikileaks. It's the only source of truth on the Planet. Keep on leaking Wiki.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:08 | 1235020 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

Great. Now I suspect you of being Mossad.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:09 | 1235039 Alex Kintner
Alex Kintner's picture

Dammit. You blew my cover. I did indeed see a Moose in Maine once.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:19 | 1235094 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

I saw that moose go down! So you must of been the dancing Israeli I spotted under a nearby bush.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:32 | 1235170 JohnG
JohnG's picture

A moose bit by sister once

-MP

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 15:04 | 1235321 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

Hey, Rocky! Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!

-BW

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 16:00 | 1235559 velobabe
velobabe's picture

i thought i read something on WLcentral, that the courier of OBL was known about back in 08. this courier was mentioned again from the WH, i thought. they followed him. wikileaks is not gov or anything like that. he has some trouble on his hands right now.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 23:36 | 1236929 tiger7905
tiger7905's picture

Some interesting thoughts by Gonzalo on Bin Laden.

Summary here:

http://goldandsilverlinings.com/?p=876

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:18 | 1235071 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

Obama? Only power hungry boot-licker wannabes work for that puppet.

The name you're searching for is Rothschild.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:25 | 1235112 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

So how does reporting that in 2008 US troops were active in an area which in 2011 was claimed to be the hiding place of bin Laden help the Rothschilds?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:34 | 1235179 capitallosses
capitallosses's picture

Oh jeez, come on, it's more fodder to support the view necessary to their story that he didn't die a decade ago.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 15:09 | 1235344 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

But the leaked documents don't support that view at all. How does stating that some US soldiers walked by a building in 2008 have any bearing on events in that neighborhood three years later? The earlier event does not corroborate the later event. Why do you think it does?

 

 

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 07:09 | 1237310 Hexus
Hexus's picture

So the big leak is "some soldier walked by a building three years ago". If that's newsworthy for wikileaks then they have lost their touch.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 15:00 | 1235295 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

crockett died at the alamo in 1836. would it be possible for you to remove his name from your handle. you are becoming more of  a embarrassment to the texas deligation, as time goes by, almost as much as texas gunslinger......

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 15:17 | 1235387 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

Please explain how a statement indicating that US troops walked down a street which three years later became the supposed site of bin Laden's death has any bearing on the latter event.

It doesn't. Try this analogy:

How would the statement "US troops walked down Main Street in 2008 and did not see the Easter Bunny" serve to support the premise that Obama killed the Easter Bunny on Main Street in 2011?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:51 | 1236334 i-dog
i-dog's picture

You're onto it, Crockett. TD gave us a misleading headline when he wrote "forces yards away from Osama" when, in fact, they were simply yards away from the place where they later [allegedly] found Osama.

They were also yards away from the book depository 2 years before Oswald [allegedly] shot Kennedy........

They're just using Wikileaks to try to convince the public that Osama was actually alive 2 years ago ... which I don't buy. There is considerable evidence that he died shortly after the bombing of Tora Bora and zero credible evidence that he has been alive since then.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 21:16 | 1236561 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

If you understand this:

they were simply yards away from the place where they later [allegedly] found Osama.

I don't understand how you get to this:

They're just using Wikileaks to try to convince the public that Osama was actually alive 2 years ago

My question remains: How does the wikileaks report that US troops did not see bin Laden in Abbottabad in 2008 lead anyone to believe that he was alive at the time? The 2008 event has no bearing on the situation in 2011. If "they" wanted to plant a lie wouldn't "they" plant a lie which supports their position rather than one that has no bearing on their position?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 21:41 | 1236587 i-dog
i-dog's picture

Wikileaks couldn't release a [non-existent] cable saying that Osama had been seen at that place 3 years ago, so they did the next best thing ... which results in misleading headlines around the world trumpeting, as Tyler also did: "Wikileaks: US Forces Yards Away From Osama In 2008". The public only read/hear the headlines and go away with the impression that Osama was alive 3 years ago ... thereby giving more credence to the bullshit story that he was killed a few days ago ... which is exactly what the CIA-Wikileaks intended.

I thought, from your OP, that you understood that. Apparently my confidence was misplaced.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 21:44 | 1236621 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

So Assange has targeted those with poor reading comprehension in order to spread his nefarious lies?

Do you really believe that every single thing wikileaks puts out is a well crafted lie? Even if Assange is the bastard child of David Rockefeller and Golda Meir wouldn't you expect there to be a substantial amount of fairly meaningless chaff mixed in with Assange's purposeful lies?

The "truther" obsession with branding every single sentence spoken by Assange as an attempt at mind control is simply bizarre.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 22:04 | 1236660 i-dog
i-dog's picture

"Do you really believe that every single thing wikileaks puts out is a well crafted lie?"

Yes, I do start out from that premise. Wikileaks is a CIA-controlled "limited hangout" ... which means that they combine truth with redaction. That is not the same as telling an outright lie (which is what O'bomber is best at). I don't believe that they have ever released false information or forged documents.

So, to ascertain the real motive for each release, one must look at what they don't say (in this case: that he was seen) or which leader/s they don't expose.

All of their releases are targetted at manipulating perceptions at critical times, through selective releases of the truth. They have done it over and over again.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 22:34 | 1236755 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

Wikileaks is a CIA-controlled "limited hangout" ... which means that they combine truth with redaction. That is not the same as telling an outright lie

 

Such a confident assertion must be based on substantial evidence. Please provide your documentation.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 23:01 | 1236823 i-dog
i-dog's picture

Check my old debates with Geopol on this board about 6 months ago (back when I was a believer in, and defender of, Wikileaks).

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 00:24 | 1237015 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

Check my old posts which prove you're as wrong as you can be.

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 07:28 | 1237322 Hexus
Tue, 05/03/2011 - 21:48 | 1236633 Freddie
Freddie's picture

Sonny Crockett died! OMG! When? 18:36 hours? Was Tubbs there? So sad.

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 07:03 | 1237303 Hexus
Hexus's picture

1. It cover up the fact that he died nine years ago.

2. It suggests Pakistan were hiding him, therefore we should bring some democracy to Pakistan.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 17:05 | 1235757 clymer
clymer's picture

It's official - tyler is pushing the Osama Bin-dead-a-while (but let's all pretend we just got him and call it a "war on terror victory")

 

Wiki-hedge

 

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 17:13 | 1235780 clymer
clymer's picture

I call it like I see it

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 19:39 | 1236299 NumberNone
NumberNone's picture

Osama dead.  Video posted on Youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfPGNSCgXZQ 

 

 

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:23 | 1234789 Bruno the Bear
Bruno the Bear's picture

Maybe it was the other kind of coke?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:29 | 1234804 In Fed We Trust
In Fed We Trust's picture

Tyler,

Is that you back there?

Cuz it sure dosn't sound like your voice any more.

Since when have you been a big fan of the CIA controlled Wikileaks?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:37 | 1234865 AZSovreign
AZSovreign's picture

And why do they keep calling him the "World's" most wanted? He was only wanted here for crimes he didn't commit. He was a risky CIA asset in that his death served a grand political purpose.

 

Wikileaks, lulz, more like Wikiganda for the sheep....

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:51 | 1234926 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

Tyler has spoken approvingly of wikileaks more often than not from what I've read.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:54 | 1234939 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

IMO, his post is neither pro Wikileaks nor con (well, unless you count the reference to the Guardian's "fastest analysis" note).

Either way, it's (dis)info not to be ignored. Otherwise, it's harder to tell how the whole script is written.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 16:02 | 1235581 velobabe
velobabe's picture

may 3, national free press day, being celebrated in the US of Fraud today. what a joke that is.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:24 | 1234793 tamboo
tamboo's picture

sheesh, enough with the wikileaks koolaid already!

http://truthrss.com/2010/07/28/wikileaks-cointelpro/

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:53 | 1234935 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

"Truthers" give those who have realistic doubts about government a bad name.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:26 | 1234799 Ancona
Ancona's picture

This is all just another distraction from current events that really mean something. I think it is great that Bin Laden was killed, but I think he should have been packed in to the carcass of a 400 pound boar hog and buried in a pigpen. Why the hell are we permitting dhimmitude in our nation?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:30 | 1234808 A Lunatic
A Lunatic's picture

Well this certainly sheds some new light on the reasoning behind falling PM prices.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:28 | 1234809 DizzySailor
DizzySailor's picture

if you trust a Paki you are a fool.  Who sold Neuk technology?  This is being in bed with the wrong crowd and time will show I am right, if we survive.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:07 | 1235014 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

Do you not realize that this story line is all a creation to polarize you into a herd, "us" against a bogeyman, "them?"

Meanwhile the elites that fund both sides of spy vs. spy are enjoying the spectacle. These actors and their storylines are no more believable than those of professional wrestling.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:31 | 1234828 Segestan
Segestan's picture

Ya.. like the Paki's never knew a thing..... BS to the first degree.

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:36 | 1234841 SDRII
SDRII's picture

OBL was well know for his tunnel escapes (tora bora etc., compounds, etc). Why would there not be a series of tunnel escapes?

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 14:12 | 1235043 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

Look, you're never going to enjoy the show unless you learn to suspend your belief system.

I just wonder how many years they spent creating the facade named OBL 2.0?

First fake Saddams, now fake bin Ladens.

I bet they put him next to the military academy so the ISI could have him close at hand.

Wed, 05/04/2011 - 07:36 | 1237334 Hexus
Hexus's picture

John Mclain was well known for his resourcefulness, he would of bagged that SOB YEEEHAAAAAHHH!

Tue, 05/03/2011 - 13:38 | 1234869 Ima anal sphincter
Ima anal sphincter's picture

Gawd......First it was the "wedding", now this OBL thingy. Neither of them has any importance in today's world (for the people who knew he was dead and don't give a rat's ass for the "war on terror" lie).

I need some gun pratice.......short range shots first.......the TV's are dead.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!