- advertisements -
Bullshit propaganda via gov controlled wikileaks.
WTB moar dual party paradigm controlled opposition tactics (yawn).
NEWSFLASH: Some parts of the population are capable of critical thinking. I guess you can still 'fool some of the people some of the time'.
How does news of a three year old near miss help the government?
Ha ha. They can pin the near miss on Bush.
So you believe that Assange is working specifically for Obama and the democrats and not the US government at large or the military-industrial complex or Mossad?
No, I was joking. Assange works for Assange IMO. I'm Pro-Wikileaks. It's the only source of truth on the Planet. Keep on leaking Wiki.
Great. Now I suspect you of being Mossad.
Dammit. You blew my cover. I did indeed see a Moose in Maine once.
I saw that moose go down! So you must of been the dancing Israeli I spotted under a nearby bush.
A moose bit by sister once
Hey, Rocky! Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!
i thought i read something on WLcentral, that the courier of OBL was known about back in 08. this courier was mentioned again from the WH, i thought. they followed him. wikileaks is not gov or anything like that. he has some trouble on his hands right now.
Some interesting thoughts by Gonzalo on Bin Laden.
Obama? Only power hungry boot-licker wannabes work for that puppet.
The name you're searching for is Rothschild.
So how does reporting that in 2008 US troops were active in an area which in 2011 was claimed to be the hiding place of bin Laden help the Rothschilds?
Oh jeez, come on, it's more fodder to support the view necessary to their story that he didn't die a decade ago.
But the leaked documents don't support that view at all. How does stating that some US soldiers walked by a building in 2008 have any bearing on events in that neighborhood three years later? The earlier event does not corroborate the later event. Why do you think it does?
So the big leak is "some soldier walked by a building three years ago". If that's newsworthy for wikileaks then they have lost their touch.
crockett died at the alamo in 1836. would it be possible for you to remove his name from your handle. you are becoming more of a embarrassment to the texas deligation, as time goes by, almost as much as texas gunslinger......
Please explain how a statement indicating that US troops walked down a street which three years later became the supposed site of bin Laden's death has any bearing on the latter event.
It doesn't. Try this analogy:
How would the statement "US troops walked down Main Street in 2008 and did not see the Easter Bunny" serve to support the premise that Obama killed the Easter Bunny on Main Street in 2011?
You're onto it, Crockett. TD gave us a misleading headline when he wrote "forces yards away from Osama" when, in fact, they were simply yards away from the place where they later [allegedly] found Osama.
They were also yards away from the book depository 2 years before Oswald [allegedly] shot Kennedy........
They're just using Wikileaks to try to convince the public that Osama was actually alive 2 years ago ... which I don't buy. There is considerable evidence that he died shortly after the bombing of Tora Bora and zero credible evidence that he has been alive since then.
If you understand this:
they were simply yards away from the place where they later [allegedly] found Osama.
I don't understand how you get to this:
They're just using Wikileaks to try to convince the public that Osama was actually alive 2 years ago
My question remains: How does the wikileaks report that US troops did not see bin Laden in Abbottabad in 2008 lead anyone to believe that he was alive at the time? The 2008 event has no bearing on the situation in 2011. If "they" wanted to plant a lie wouldn't "they" plant a lie which supports their position rather than one that has no bearing on their position?
Wikileaks couldn't release a [non-existent] cable saying that Osama had been seen at that place 3 years ago, so they did the next best thing ... which results in misleading headlines around the world trumpeting, as Tyler also did: "Wikileaks: US Forces Yards Away From Osama In 2008". The public only read/hear the headlines and go away with the impression that Osama was alive 3 years ago ... thereby giving more credence to the bullshit story that he was killed a few days ago ... which is exactly what the CIA-Wikileaks intended.
I thought, from your OP, that you understood that. Apparently my confidence was misplaced.
So Assange has targeted those with poor reading comprehension in order to spread his nefarious lies?
Do you really believe that every single thing wikileaks puts out is a well crafted lie? Even if Assange is the bastard child of David Rockefeller and Golda Meir wouldn't you expect there to be a substantial amount of fairly meaningless chaff mixed in with Assange's purposeful lies?
The "truther" obsession with branding every single sentence spoken by Assange as an attempt at mind control is simply bizarre.
"Do you really believe that every single thing wikileaks puts out is a well crafted lie?"
"Do you really believe that every single thing wikileaks puts out is a well crafted lie?"
Yes, I do start out from that premise. Wikileaks is a CIA-controlled "limited hangout" ... which means that they combine truth with redaction. That is not the same as telling an outright lie (which is what O'bomber is best at). I don't believe that they have ever released false information or forged documents.
So, to ascertain the real motive for each release, one must look at what they don't say (in this case: that he was seen) or which leader/s they don't expose.
All of their releases are targetted at manipulating perceptions at critical times, through selective releases of the truth. They have done it over and over again.
Wikileaks is a CIA-controlled "limited hangout" ... which means that they combine truth with redaction. That is not the same as telling an outright lie
Such a confident assertion must be based on substantial evidence. Please provide your documentation.
Check my old debates with Geopol on this board about 6 months ago (back when I was a believer in, and defender of, Wikileaks).
Check my old posts which prove you're as wrong as you can be.
Tarpley for the win.
Sonny Crockett died! OMG! When? 18:36 hours? Was Tubbs there? So sad.
1. It cover up the fact that he died nine years ago.
2. It suggests Pakistan were hiding him, therefore we should bring some democracy to Pakistan.
It's official - tyler is pushing the Osama Bin-dead-a-while (but let's all pretend we just got him and call it a "war on terror victory")
I call it like I see it
Osama dead. Video posted on Youtube:
Maybe it was the other kind of coke?
Is that you back there?
Cuz it sure dosn't sound like your voice any more.
Since when have you been a big fan of the CIA controlled Wikileaks?
And why do they keep calling him the "World's" most wanted? He was only wanted here for crimes he didn't commit. He was a risky CIA asset in that his death served a grand political purpose.
Wikileaks, lulz, more like Wikiganda for the sheep....
Tyler has spoken approvingly of wikileaks more often than not from what I've read.
IMO, his post is neither pro Wikileaks nor con (well, unless you count the reference to the Guardian's "fastest analysis" note).
Either way, it's (dis)info not to be ignored. Otherwise, it's harder to tell how the whole script is written.
may 3, national free press day, being celebrated in the US of Fraud today. what a joke that is.
sheesh, enough with the wikileaks koolaid already!
"Truthers" give those who have realistic doubts about government a bad name.
This is all just another distraction from current events that really mean something. I think it is great that Bin Laden was killed, but I think he should have been packed in to the carcass of a 400 pound boar hog and buried in a pigpen. Why the hell are we permitting dhimmitude in our nation?
Well this certainly sheds some new light on the reasoning behind falling PM prices.
if you trust a Paki you are a fool. Who sold Neuk technology? This is being in bed with the wrong crowd and time will show I am right, if we survive.
Do you not realize that this story line is all a creation to polarize you into a herd, "us" against a bogeyman, "them?"
Meanwhile the elites that fund both sides of spy vs. spy are enjoying the spectacle. These actors and their storylines are no more believable than those of professional wrestling.
Ya.. like the Paki's never knew a thing..... BS to the first degree.
OBL was well know for his tunnel escapes (tora bora etc., compounds, etc). Why would there not be a series of tunnel escapes?
Look, you're never going to enjoy the show unless you learn to suspend your belief system.
I just wonder how many years they spent creating the facade named OBL 2.0?
First fake Saddams, now fake bin Ladens.
I bet they put him next to the military academy so the ISI could have him close at hand.
John Mclain was well known for his resourcefulness, he would of bagged that SOB YEEEHAAAAAHHH!
Gawd......First it was the "wedding", now this OBL thingy. Neither of them has any importance in today's world (for the people who knew he was dead and don't give a rat's ass for the "war on terror" lie).
I need some gun pratice.......short range shots first.......the TV's are dead.
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.