This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Will BP Skip the Relief Well, Declare Mission Accomplished, and Abandon Ship Without Permanently Killing the Oil Leak?

George Washington's picture




 

Washington’s
Blog

Yesterday, I pointed out that - while everyone is claiming that the oil well has been capped - it hasn't really been capped.

AP reported last night:

BP, U.S. mull whether to skip 'bottom kill'

***

The
federal government and BP have recently raised the possibility that
they won't need to perform the operation at all, since the well was
plugged last month with mud and cement pumped in through the top.

(Bottom kill is, of course, just another phrase for relief wells.)

Similarly, Bloomberg writes today:

BP Plc may not finish drilling a relief well to its
Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico, National Incident Commander Thad
Allen said during a conference call today.

The relief well, which for months has been touted by the
U.S. government as the ultimate solution to stopping the flow
from Macondo -- a process known as “killing” the well -- may
not be needed after all, Allen said.

Oil industry expert Robert Cavnar has a must-read piece today on the situation:

For
the last several days, I've been trying to figure out what BP is doing
and what is the actual condition of BP's MC252 well after their
"static kill" and cementing procedure last week apparently didn't work.
You'll recall that when [BP's] Kent Wells announced this procedure, he
actually used the words "killed" and "dead".

 

***

To add to the argument to go ahead with the kill, Adm. Allen said in his July 22nd briefing:

"We have a pressure head up there that would help us now fill the top part of the well with mud. That would actually ultimately enhance the relief well effort that would take place five to seven days later." (emphasis added)

On
August 2nd and 3rd, BP ran the "static kill" pumping 2,300 barrels of
mud. Early in the morning on the 4th, BP issued a press release saying
the the well had reached a "static condition" with well pressure
"controlled by the hydrostatic pressure of the drilling mud." In his
McBriefing later that day, Wells actually said that when they pumped the
mud, they could actually see it go into the reservoir by pressures,
and that they pumped up to 15 barrels per minute. They studiously
avoided the terms "dead" and "killed". During the briefing, Wells also said:

"And
what we - what we're doing now is, every six hours, we just inject a
little more mud into the well, just to continue to give ourselves
confidence that we can do that, keep our equipment live, and we're
seeing a very, very static set of conditions as we continue to monitor the pressure, which is all very encouraging."
(empasis added)

With
all the encouraging signs, [U.S. Secretary of Energy] Steve Chu
approved pumping cement, which they did on the 5th. In a briefing on
the 6th, Doug Suttles declared victory, say that the "...cement job is
performing as expected". He also said that they pumped 500 barrels of
cement, leaving about 200 inside the casing.

All was right with
the world. Except, it wasn't. Day before yesterday, Adm. Allen
announced they were going to start a "pressure test", babbling about
the annulus and raising the ominous spectre that they are still
actually communicated to the reservoir. Wells confirmed that fear in
the afternoon, admitting that they indeed had 4,200 psi on the well
when it's supposed to be dead. At the seafloor, the well should have
no more than 2,200 psi on it, and conceivable less, if the hydrostatic
of the mud in the closed well had overcome reservoir pressure. Then it
got really confusing. Wells said that it wouldn't hold 4,200 psi
because of "bubbles" leaking out of the wellhead, implying that they
are pumping on it to keep it there, but that they're going to "test" it
by relieving pressure. ?? Also, the more Adm. Allen explains what's
going on, the more the press gets confused. Hell, I understand this
business and I'm confused.

To add to the jumble, Adm Allen said this in his briefing yesterday:

"Sure,
there's a very low probability that we might have actually sealed the
annulus with the cement that came down the pipe casing and came back up
around it. What we want to do is understand whether or not there's
what we call free communication. In other words whether there, the
hydrocarbons in the reservoir can actually come up through the annulus
outside the casing, if that's the case when we go in and we drill in we
put the mud and cement we're just going to drive that down and seal the
well. OK? If there's cement there and there's no communication
that means we have what we call stagnate oil trapped around that casing
up to the well head. If you go in and you start pumping mud and
cement in there the chances are you could raise the pressure and push
that up into the blow out preventer. And that's a very low
possibility, low probability event but we want to, we want to test the
pressure in the blow out preventer and see if we actually have pressure
coming up that would indicate that we have free communication with the
reservoir. If not that would change our tactics and how we do the
final kill."

Clear as drilling mud. What's going
on here is that the "static kill" looks like it did the opposite of
what BP and Allen had suggested at the beginning. It certainly hasn't
accelerated the relief well. To the contrary, it has caused
interminable delays. As a matter of fact, since July 13, the DDIII has
only drilled 70 or 80 feet and set one string of casing. With all of
the shut downs for the "well integrity test", then the "well
injectivity test", then the "static kill" plus cementing, they haven't
been able to get much work done for a month, especially with the 2
weather delays.

The mis-information and confusion is also taking
its toll. I got asked in an interview yesterday that since the well
is "dead" now, why are they bothering with the relief well? AP reported
last night that BP and the government are contemplating skipping the
bottom kill. Every time Wells, Suttles, or Allen get in front of a
microphone, everyone gets even more confused, mis-informed, or both;
everyone just wants this to go away, but it's not going away; not until
the relief well kills from the bottom as we've been saying for over 3
months.

In actuality, this "static kill" did nothing that BP and
Allen said it would do. Certainly the well is not dead or "static".
It hasn't accelerated the relief well, but it has obscured the well's
pressures, making it more difficult to kill. Hence, these new tests to
figure out what's going on. BP and the government don't really have a
clue where the 2,300 barrels of mud and 500 barrels of cement went.
They originally claimed it all went down the casing and out to the
reservoir. I would set the probability of that actually having happened
at zero. Here's why: The positive test on the casing the night of the
blowout was rock solid. The casing was good. It is possible that
they may have collapsed the production casing during the blowout, but
that would have been relatively high up in the wellbore, probably where
they had displaced with seawater on the inside. If that happened, it
would be communicated with the backside. In addition, at the bottom of
the production casing is a float shoe, 134 feet of cement in the shoe
track, then a float collar, then 2 cementing plugs with probably
cement on top of those. Oh, and don't forget about the 3,000 feet of
drill pipe hanging inside all of that. There is no way, unless that
entire float assembly blew off, that they pumped down the casing and up
the backside. On top of all that, there are HUGE lost circulation
zones both below and above the reservoir. During drilling they lost
3,000 barrels of mud trying to drill that last section.

So,
where did all the mud and cement go? It likely went down the backside
of the production casing and either out through some damage that was
caused during the aborted top kill, or out the lost circulation zone
right below the 9 7/8" liner at 17,100. The fact that they're getting
pressure now tells me that they are indeed communicated to the
reservoir below, probably obscured by the fact that they now have mud
strung through the annulus. If they are indeed communicated, pressure
will build on the wellhead, which is exactly what's happening. Adm.
Allen pledged to get BP to release the pressure data 3 days ago. The
next day, when asked about it, he said it was released, but "nobody can
find it." The data is still AWOL.

So, now, here we sit,
waiting on weather again, and then we're going to pressure test a well
that's supposed to be dead instead of getting the relief well finished.
The press is confused; the public is bored.

BP has tried to cover up every aspect of the spill. See this, this and this.

The
bottom kill - the procedure which all oil industry experts agree has
the best chance of killing the leak - hasn't yet been performed. The
underwater cameras still show methane and oil leaking into the Gulf.

And yet the country's attention is already drifting away from the Gulf and to celebrities, stocks, and other issues.

I'm
beginning to wonder whether BP keeps on doing one confusing procedure
after another, and keeps on saying that the well has been capped, hoping
that everyone stops paying attention so that BP can just pack up its
bags and slink away while people aren't paying attention.

Relief
wells are the best hope for permanently capping the well. But it is
possible that BP has messed up the well so badly that the relief wells will fail.

As Cavnar notes,
BP has already taken down or blurred most of its underwater camera
feeds. BP might just declare "mission accomplished" and skip the
relief wells, leaving a ticking time bomb which will pollute the Gulf for years to come.

Note:
I hope that BP and the government do complete the relief wells next
week after the tropical storm passes. I am not predicting that BP will
skip the bottom kill ... I am only warning that they are considering it,
and am writing this so people can put pressure on BP and the government
to complete both relief wells.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 08/12/2010 - 16:03 | 518506 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

Check the shredder bin!

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:41 | 518310 MayIMommaDogFac...
MayIMommaDogFace2theBananaPatch's picture

I'm just holding it for a friend...I mean, a friend is holding it for ME -- yeah, that's it. 

 

Everybody's looking for it though.  Pretty sure it will show up RSN.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:13 | 518219 Boilermaker
Boilermaker's picture

Ahhh yes, BP, the posterchild of ethical business behavior.  It's so wonderful having those fuckers drilling into our coastal areas.  I just wish there was more of them.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:05 | 518185 Grand Supercycle
Grand Supercycle's picture

DOW and SP500 bearish megaphone wedge charts continue ...

http://stockmarket618.wordpress.com

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:03 | 518183 Votewithabullet
Votewithabullet's picture

I wish those 19 sand niggers would have found the building you were in whorehay.UMBAUMFERZIG.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 17:19 | 518678 breezer1
breezer1's picture

how did you get along with your dad?

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:49 | 518340 downrodeo
downrodeo's picture

well, that's a sweet sentiment...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(i'm being sarcastic)

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 17:01 | 518642 VWbug
VWbug's picture

these are the people i have a problem with dr, seems to be a lot of them here unfortunately

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:01 | 518175 truont
truont's picture

These phvkers don't care one thing about human or animal life.

The only life they value is their own.

Evidence:  I love the Goldman Sachs quote from Fab Tourre who bragged about Goldman's huge short position in the Gulf, established well before public knowledge about the Gulf Oil leak was available:

"One oil rig goes down and we're going to be rolling in dough," Mr. Tourre wrote in one email. "Suck it, fishies and birdies!"

 

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-borowitz/goldman-sachs-reveals-it_b_5...

 

 

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:10 | 518190 George Washington
George Washington's picture

Great quote, but Borowitz is a comedian (he often gets misquoted as an actual journalist, but it's just parody)...

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 23:04 | 519224 VWbug
VWbug's picture

Borowitz is a comedian (he often gets misquoted as an actual journalist

ah jesus, too funny, i don't even know where to begin..

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 15:07 | 518379 whatsinaname
whatsinaname's picture

yes GW. I get the feeling BP is stalling the final relief well and is scared about something sinister. They may just settle for the top kill in its current form and try to get away with it.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!