• Tim Knight from...
    04/28/2016 - 00:27
    I was expecting a few boring candidate statements of the U.S. Senate - AKA the World's Most Exclusive Club - but, boy, was I wrong. Just take a look at some of these gems.
  • Tim Knight from...
    04/28/2016 - 00:27
    I was expecting a few boring candidate statements of the U.S. Senate - AKA the World's Most Exclusive Club - but, boy, was I wrong. Just take a look at some of these gems.

Will The Onslaught Of Baby Boomers Further Exacerbate The U.S. Current Account Deficit And Entrench The DM-EM Capital Flows?

Tyler Durden's picture




 
0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 08/12/2010 - 11:42 | 517819 chrisd
chrisd's picture

We also need to re-evaluate the theme that every healthcare company lists as the number 1 investment rationale - baby boomer demographics. We already saw what occured as a result of them purchasing goods, both on borrowed dollars as well as earned. What happens when 60% of them are receiving end-of-life care at the same time? We continue to rely on government payors for healthcare. Private payors will increasingly find ways to cut costs and / or not pay at all.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 11:47 | 517834 Mongo
Mongo's picture

Here is one for ya!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9q36UFzx70

 

Scared?...you will be... YOU WILL BE!

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 11:53 | 517847 Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

Sign O' The Times Mongo.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 11:56 | 517852 Mongo
Mongo's picture

Indeed. Quite sad actually, but I agree. Sign of the times we live in.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:27 | 517924 Vampyroteuthis ...
Vampyroteuthis infernalis's picture

Not too far from a 3rd world nation.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 15:12 | 518392 midtowng
midtowng's picture

What this article doesn't talk about is how this will effect a global monetary structure that is based on a currency from a nation with a chronic CA deficit.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 11:51 | 517840 IrishSamurai
IrishSamurai's picture

Have made this point over and over again to family and friends regarding the markets ... this Depression is (and will continue to be) demographical in nature.  Lots of capital outflows from Baby Boomers as they draw down their meager retirement to supplement the Ponzi (SS/Medicare) that cannot be sustained and eventually they and the Ponzi will die off ...

Dow sub-5000 is not a possibility, it is a certainty ...unless the administration and policy makers engage the Soylent Green strategy ...

 

 

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 11:52 | 517849 The 22nd Prime
The 22nd Prime's picture

Maybe it should be retitled...

"Current Accounts and Demographics: The Road to Serfdom"

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:02 | 517865 pauldia
pauldia's picture

A little off topic but very poignant. A approximately 8:08 tp 8:10 am this morning on CNBS Becky Quick is doing an interview, During which she refers to the issue of volumne picking after the summer ends and states won't it be more difficult to " manipulate" with retail investors entering? Could someone check and post the video?

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:31 | 517937 Conrad Murray
Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:03 | 517873 Paul Bogdanich
Paul Bogdanich's picture

Will the Baby Boomers retirement aggrivate the deficit?

Ya think?  What a news flash this is.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:05 | 517877 Stranger in the Alps
Stranger in the Alps's picture

Wonder what this means for the future of Chimerica...

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:07 | 517879 Stuart
Stuart's picture

AND especially with low interest rates, retirees are forced to deplete their capital to make ends meet.  

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:08 | 517882 docj
docj's picture

Will the onslaught of baby boomers further exacerbate the U.S. current account deficit...

Uh, yes.  Of course.  Duh.  Next question.

Meanwhile, ain't it cute watching the FedCo PPT doing their darndest to resurrect this courpse of a market?  Plucky little bastards, don't you think?

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:13 | 517892 Misean
Misean's picture

"one of Obama's more ambitious plans is to double US exports over the next five years which means a collapse in the current account deficit."

Brack "Bass Ackwards" Obumble.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:22 | 517907 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Well he could be right. I think it's possible to double our exports of death, destruction, and fraud in 5 years. It might take some long hours and hard work but I think Wall Street and Washington are up to the challenge!

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:26 | 517922 Misean
Misean's picture

Those are the few things running at 110% capacity right now.  Doubling is quite a tall order.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:47 | 518136 Pheesh
Pheesh's picture

Hmm, I don't see how the US doubling exports could be construed as a negative goal, I just don't believe it can be legitimately accomplished in the current environment. 

 

More power to us if we actually start exporting more value than we import...

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 15:35 | 518448 docj
docj's picture

Well, we certainly exported "financial innovation" (MBS, CDO, etc.) to the world.  How'd that work out for everyone?

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:22 | 517906 carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

 People aren't putting their savings in passbook accounts they're putting them in 401Ks or brokerage accounts... everybody need higher yields.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:00 | 517999 gs_runsthiscountry
gs_runsthiscountry's picture

BINGO - and they werent putting money in savings accounts back in 1999 either.

Hence, the repeal of Glass-Steagll and in with Gramm-Leach Bliley. The birth of the Bank Holding company, which, put us where we are today.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:22 | 517914 Hansel
Hansel's picture

Which Goldman decoder ring are we supposed to use today?  Reverse psychology or Reverse-reverse psychology?

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:59 | 518168 aheady
aheady's picture

Really.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:31 | 517933 SDRII
SDRII's picture

The entire analysis is predicated on a forex regime ex anti in its assumptions. Maybe but unlikely. Why is a benign response to coalition of the willing preemptive move to SDR presupposed? What does the "model" look like with a dethroned dollar? A war? Demographics undeniable, but to suppose this means a perpetuation of a disfunctional mechanism innuring to incumbants (or DM) is typical self serving sell side junk

Pettis most recent on the shift to China consumoption is a more interesting read on balances 

http://mpettis.com/2010/08/chinese-consumption-and-the-japanese-%e2%80%9csorpasso%e2%80%9d/

 

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:34 | 517944 crzyhun
crzyhun's picture

Reverse Dent psychology. Pretty hairy.

Actually, demographics for western culture are declining. Check it out. Thus, not just US of A, but Japan, Europe = Russia, and China too. What it all suggests is a lowering of lifestyle/GDP vs Africa most of South/A + Mexic0, and the Middle East ex Israel.

Oh- and as if that weren't enough, south of the border, down Mexic0 way, total drug war....this is more than rampant drug use in the northern 48. This is about power and money- lots of it....sleep well sheeple.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:35 | 517945 william the bastard
william the bastard's picture

In summary, If the US pulls its guarantee of GSE obligations, ye prince of Pimco will exit, driving up yields, pulling in Chinese investors and briefly reflating the US credit rating. Alas all's well with the world ex seniors and 401k-ites using Pimco as a mattress.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 12:41 | 517953 poorold
poorold's picture

The demographic shift is going to be a ball and chain around any real economic growth.

Savings of retirees are going to shrink quite a bit and much faster than anyone projects.

I expect there will be an ever increasing pool of "retirees" looking for work that isn't there while they try to pay for life's basics--food, shelter, transportation and, of course, 10 prescription medications they are taking every day.

 

All of these looks into the future ignore the fact that the world is broke and getting more broke.  Standards of living are declining more more and more people.  And the government is going to try and maintain the standard of living via their promises of social security, healthcare, etc.

It's simply not possible and the government's attempt to do so is going to tax the productive elements of the economy into poverty too.

But nobody models that.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:07 | 518010 KevinB
KevinB's picture

Demographics and investing are "long overlooked"?

Only if you haven't been paying attention for, oh, a decade or so. David Cork wrote "The Pig and the Python" which addressed this issue in 256 glorious pages.

Of course, although he covered the developed world, he was from Canada, so everyone ignores him until the geniuses in Wall Street discover it ten years later.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 16:24 | 518554 juliawong
juliawong's picture

Also from Canada, David Foot: Boom, Bust and Echo, 1996

Canadians have long range thinking perspective?

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:07 | 518012 JR
JR's picture

Bottom Line: The baby boomers were born after the war was over because of the promise of prosperity, i.e., that with no war the American system would produce jobs and economic growth.  The boomers worked and the fifties delivered on the economic dream. 

But now, just as retirement begins, the boomers find that mysteriously that dream has been stolen.  All the prosperity and the promise are gone.  And standing beside that empty space in the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow are the obscenely wealthy, criminal investment bankers who’ve used their political connections and control of the money supply to take every last dime they can bag. 

And in walks Goldman today, its investment hat put aside and its caring analytical economic hat in place, with a very detailed analysis on just where those stupid baby boomers went wrong.

It’s kind of suspicious to me that just as the first baby boomers are approaching the end of that rainbow, there's Blankfein, with his little smirk and analytical report, explaining to them why the pot will be empty.

The analysis of this story is that the international bankers are diverting attention away from the fact that they copped the American Dream and have arrived at the scene of the empty coffers to place the blame for their crimes on the baby boomers. Boomers helped build the American Dream and should be retiring into retirement prosperity.  Instead they’re taking out reverse mortgages on their homes and cutting their prescription pills into quarters to stay financially and physically alive.

And Goldman, and its dupes, call the boomers “greedy.”  Where is Tom Brokaw now with a sequel to his book The Greatest Generation, with a book on Who Stole the Future?

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:26 | 518061 Segestan
Segestan's picture

True.. but no one wants to hear a good word for the greedy boomer, they only want to have a say in how the bankrupt boomer retires. I'm a boomer,  and their is much blame to go around starting with globalization and the Peace corp nonsense.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:54 | 518132 Vampyroteuthis ...
Vampyroteuthis infernalis's picture

Thank you Segestan. A honest boomer who realizes that the boomers as a generation are complicit in their own future impoverishment. I am part of Gen X and what do we get? The left over scraps given to us by boomers and an enormous debt load we will never be able to pay off. Thanks for nothing!

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:02 | 518178 Segestan
Segestan's picture

We are all products of grand ideas... the LAST war etc. etc... the strong survive..

Boomers as a group were children of grand ideas. Only the globalist used the grand idea to line there pockets.

Just wait until you get old and others act like the world is wrong because of you...

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:43 | 518120 aerojet
aerojet's picture

The boomers didn't work in the 50s, they were children in the 50s! Their parents did the work!  Also, the baby boom is a result of the war years, not the result of a more hopeful future.  In the 1950s, everyone thought there would be an atomic war with Russia. 

Had better birth control been available in 1945, there would have been no baby boom.

 

 

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:07 | 518187 Segestan
Segestan's picture

The Pepsi generation would disagree. As for birth control , no we needed border control and honest business. America is less than 5% of humanity.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:11 | 518213 aerojet
aerojet's picture

So explain to me how 10 year old kids built America again? And explain how the statistical anomaly that is your generation had nothing to do with the pent up desires of American servicement separated from the sweethearts? 

It is a well-known sociological phenomenon that baby booms occur after wars end because of the unconcscious need to replace all those who died.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:25 | 518253 Segestan
Segestan's picture

I'm not going to get into pissing date with you... you know exactly how one generation leads to the next. As for population control in America .. Why?  We had the ability to feed and employ as many as could be born.. but No instead we where feed the globalization BS without end.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:46 | 518327 JR
JR's picture

My mother’s sister did not work when she was 10 years old but at 13 she began babysitting and doing garden projects to raise money for her college future, and at 15 obtained a work permit—and paid her entire way through university. It’s important not to confuse the soft-pillow Gen X driven-to-school generation with the work ethic values of the post war generation.

This letter to the editor I saw yesterday puts a face on the victimization created by the ideology of collectivist levelization that goes hand-in-hand with globalization:

Have President Walk in Our Shoes

I do not care for President Obama’s position on health care because I’m disabled and my wife and I have to try to survive on the minimum Social Security disability check I receive.  I cannot afford to buy health insurance let alone try to survive in this area and I’ll bet there are a lot more people like me in this situation.

I’ve applied for benefits at Social Services and been denied because of my assets that I’ve accumulated over the years.  They want you to exhaust your assets or be broke before they might give you any help and I’m not going to cash out my IRA just for that because I worked all my life and if I cash it out, most of it will go to paying taxes.

Maybe the president should live in our shoes and he would have a different outlook and not force us to buy something we cannot afford.

Dale Merriman, Marina, CA

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 16:46 | 518610 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

The boomers didn't work in the 50s, they were children in the 50s! Their parents did the work! 

Yeah, but we partied like a mo-fo during the 60s and 70s!  Sure was a great time to be alive.  Condoms?  We didn't need no stinkin' condoms.   Sex was a cautionary act only when pregnancy was considered.  I lived it and enjoyed it.  As with most folks my age, we eschewed information on world politics and economics.   Some made good livings and some didn't.  Not much different from today.  I am pretty well prepared for retirement and won't be much of a drag on the younger generations, but many are not.  If soylent green is in the future, well, it is.  Bloom where you are planted.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:19 | 518241 Caviar Emptor
Caviar Emptor's picture

Bingo! And as the chorus of "Reagan! Reagan!" dies down, cold hard reality sinks in: No, we can't inflate our way to prosperity one more time. Simply put: Living in a country that makes nothing but consumes everything is a doomed experiment. Lotsa luck.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 15:34 | 518442 poopdeville
poopdeville's picture

Look, this is very simple.  50 million Americans "would have" retired in the next 15 to 20 years.  That is unsustainable, especially considering that the workforce is about 180 million.  It was already hard for 180 million people to pay for 300 million.  It will be significantly harder for 130 - 140 million to pay for 300 - 310 million.  Retirees are, unfortunately, freeloaders living on the labor of the current generation of workers.  Yes, they "invested" their dollars in the capital market.  (This is actually a sign that the labor market was working above equilibrium.  Why should they have surplus dollars to "invest"?  We won't be...)  And now they're taking their capital "away", and worse yet, are selling it more-or-less simultaneously (leading to deflation of asset prices) and expecting the current generation of workers to keep working, for everybody's benefit.  See the problem?  

Most of the things Baby Boomers have made have decayed beyond use.  But they want to trade their decayed-asset backed dollar for my fresh-labor dollar.  See the problem?  My fresh-labor dollar is worth less because it has the same denomination as the decayed-asset backed dollar.  The time-value and decay-value of money and the labor it represents is not taken into account in the numerical value of a "dollar".  Note that a gold backed dollar would exacerbate this problem.  Fundamentally, the problem is that retirees want to trade 10 - 40 year old labor for today's labor.

Lets not even get into the massive misallocations of resources, in terms of disposable housing (instead of spending on structures that would last multiple lifetimes, so that retirees would actually have valuable things to trade at the ends of their lives), the creation of suburbs, etc.  The situation is a near perfect analogy to somebody "doing you a favor" (that actually ends up hurting you) before you were born, and then demanding a favor in return.  Worse yet, the marginal cost of returning the favor is much much greater now, because of the demographic problem.  I say, "Get stuffed" 

GS et al are sleazy, and they will take every last dime they can, but this is not their fault.  The American dream died because the economics of the American dream are untenable.  They always have been.  Unfortunately, people would be called "un-American" for pointing this out, even 10 years ago.  Or even today.  "Yes we can!" indeed.  Look for more of this rhetoric.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 18:14 | 518793 JR
JR's picture

In spite of your misinformation, the owners of the Federal Reserve System did extract most of the value from the American economy—and 95% of the value of a dollar since the Fed’s inception in 1913.  They did take away the value through inflation and other mechanisms of the labor and promise given to the baby boomers. 

And I can see by your reasoning they’re going to take yours too: only this time it’s a little different. In addition to taking your money and your value, they’re going to take your country.  By the time you retire, unless some of your generation fights with the rest of us, the banker-controlled politicians will be telling you which high rise cubicle is your number, and which country you may live in and whether or not you are still a valuable enough “human resource” to qualify for Dr. Emanuel’s Reaper Curve “healthcare.”

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:17 | 518043 Glasater55
Glasater55's picture

Society should have put the brakes on boomers in the sixties instead of indulging the heck out of them.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:23 | 518056 poorold
poorold's picture

I disagree with your statement.  The government didn't nudge the boomers.

Instead, the government took the boomers future and began spreading it around in the form of welfare when the government should have been educating people that having babies is not "work."

Now, the government supports illegal aliens too.

 

btw, what would the real unemployment figures be if all the unemployed illegal aliens were thrown in???

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:29 | 518080 Segestan
Segestan's picture

agree.. but most of those aliens are not even counted.. it's FAR worse than the government hacks let on.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:44 | 518125 aerojet
aerojet's picture

The illegals get by, they did the same thing back home, they don't need government.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:48 | 518142 Segestan
Segestan's picture

Well that's kind of true, they are often a hardy group, but many illegals already have someone in their families living in the system who are legals. They stay in the shadows , so to speak, but they are getting alot of family and government help.... billions.  There is no place to exist without connecting into the system.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:45 | 518130 gs_runsthiscountry
gs_runsthiscountry's picture

The fact of the matter is many of those aliens you speak of, many of them, sometimes upwards of 6-7 work off the same SS#. So, a large proportion of those will never collect on programs their labor is paying for. That bankrupt, IOU ridden, congressional slush fund is being propped up for millions for retires, on the backs of Hispanic slave labor.

 

Whether anyone wants to know the facts and deal with them is another matter.

 

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 13:53 | 518151 Segestan
Segestan's picture

Thats the story often used.. but those jobs where all filled by Americans before the flood gates let them work on the farms and even then those lucky enough to have work acted like they where slave labor. The whole poor immigrant story is a charade because thier own governments are crap they blame it on American boomer pigs.

Thu, 08/12/2010 - 14:09 | 518205 gs_runsthiscountry
gs_runsthiscountry's picture

I agree something needs to be done. Actually, I agreed something needed to be done 20 years ago. An there in lies the problem. Upwards of 20 million illegal immigrants didn't get here overnight, and no one did anything about it. Now, you have a conundrum, politically speaking.

 

Why? Because, for example, in my state all it takes to go vote is an envelope with your name and address on it, to verify where you live. You don't even need a drivers license. As a matter of fact, you dont even need that envelope unless you switched voting wards. Understand? These immigrants get to vote. Now, how do you think state and local politicians react to that while running a campaign? Say your district is 30-50% Hispanic?

 

The whole issue of voter fraud is in a dark room somewhere. Nothing has been done for years because they are votes.

 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!