You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Yet Another Opinion On The Mystery Direct Bidder, Barclays Edition

Tyler Durden's picture




A topic we have been investigating recently has been the sudden surge in direct bidding, at least as it pertains to the near end of the Treasury curve, and what the identity of the actual entity doing the buying may be. Explanations offered have ranged from China and Petrodollar accounts buying covertly, to primary dealers ramping up their activity to justify to the Fed that they are worthy for admission, all the way to the Fed conducting yet more 'under the radar' QE purchases. Today we present the opinion from Barclays, which provides another, fourth, view on things, theirs being the most benign one, namely that plain vanilla accounts have been purchasing Treasuries via the direct bid.

Ultimately, as the end-identity of the direct bidder is never disclosed, this is yet more speculation. Yet, as we disclosed, with an up to $700 billion hold that needs plugging on the demand side, the Treasury needs any and every possible source of interest for bonds. We highlighted why we believe mutual funds and money managers will likely prove to be a drop in the bucket in light of ths supply onslaught. Furthermore, we have yet to see a pick up in direct interest toward the dated side of the curve, which is by far the greatest wildcard in terms of UST demand.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 01/25/2010 - 11:15 | Link to Comment Daedal
Daedal's picture

So, in other words, Bill Gross is F'ed.

Mon, 01/25/2010 - 11:17 | Link to Comment Hondo
Hondo's picture

I think he's smoking something. 

Mon, 01/25/2010 - 11:23 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Still think its a Euro sovereign hedging against EOE (End of Euro).

Mon, 01/25/2010 - 11:26 | Link to Comment perchprism
perchprism's picture

 

Why is the identity of purchases made from the "people's treasury" not disclosed?  Why can't we simply ask Treasury officials to disclose, at a minimum, the category type of percentage purchasers?  Is it some kind of fucking national security secret?  What, are we Swiss bankers now?  This is top-to-bottom bullshit.  Who says we can't know?  Someone needs to file a FOI request. 

Mon, 01/25/2010 - 11:27 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

Grrr..... I keep coming close to finishing up my opinion and y'all keep giving great damn summaries... however you'll be interested in mine when I finish because it basically slams the treasury for their inability to 1. add 2. keep records and 3. tell the truth

 

Anyways, it'll be soon hopefully, but as more info comes out I'm so behind the power curve, lol.

Sat, 02/20/2010 - 13:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!