This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
You Have Got to be KIDDING | Trashed Out - Nancy Jacobini's Home was Broken Into AGAIN
Now this is another absolutely inexcusable act. In my opinion, it is another example of Bankster intimidation.
When the hell is it enough. We are in some very dangerous times folks...
Anyway, you all remember Nancy, right?
From October of last year...
LINK - Out of Control!!! LISTEN TO THIS TERRIFYING 911 CALL of Thugs Hired by JPMorgan Chase Breaking Down a Door
LISTEN TO THIS TERRIFYING 911 CALL – BANK BREAKING DOWN A DOOR!
The banks and institutions that now run this country are running absolutely wild and out of control.
They do not fear judges or law enforcement.
They do not fear any law.
They do not need permission to kick down your front door, steal what they want and throw everything else into the streets.
As
one of the owners of a company who specializes in “securing” or
“winterizing” properties was recently quoted in the Palm Beach Post
said, “Lawsuits don’t phase us anymore.”
I WANT ALL OF AMERICA TO WATCH THE ATTACHED NEWS STORY AND LISTEN TO ALL TEN MINUTES OF THE ATTACHED 911 PHONE CALL.
HEAR THE TERROR IN THIS WOMAN’S VOICE.
THIS WOMAN WAS NOT IN FORECLOSURE.
THIS WOMAN’S HOME WAS IN PERFECT, PRISTINE CONDITION.
SHE WAS RELAXING COMFORTABLY ON HER COUCH WHEN A BURGLAR CAME KICKING DOWN HER DOOR.
IT WAS A BURGLAR HIRED BY THE BANK BREAKING DOWN HER DOOR.
WATCH THE VIDEO BELOW
http://www.wftv.com/video/25278100/index.html?taf=orlc
LINK – LISTEN TO THE FULL 911 PHONE CALL HERE
Well, they just did it AGAIN!
Bet you can't wait til it happens to you...
www.4closureFraud.org
»
- advertisements -
"We must go forward cautiously and consolidate each acquired position, because already the inferior social stratum of society is giving unceasing signs of agitation.
Let us make use of the courts....when, through the law's intervention, the common people shall have lost their homes, they will be more easy to control and more easy to govern, and they shall not be able to resist the strong hand of the Government acting in accordance with....the control of the leaders of finance.
[We] must keep the people busy with political antagonisms. We'll therefore speed up the question of reform [of tariffs within] the Democratic Party; and we'll put the spotlight on the question of protection...[for] the Republican Party.
By dividing the electorate this way, we'll be able to have them spend their energies at struggling amongst themselves on questions that, for us, have no importance whatsoever."
United States Bankers Magazine, 1892.
Quote is taken from the film "The Secret of Oz."
This is very simple, she is not a squatter. She owns the home, her closing documents say so. The bank holds a note, which is her promise to pay. If she can't pay, being as she's in FL, the holder of the note must begin judicial proceedings to seize the house as collateral for the note. That means they must actually have the original signed note, it must have been recirded and registered properly. Then they must file suit, papers served, etc. For her to be "squatting" you assume she is not there legally. You also assume that the bank has gone through all of the proper legal proceedings in order to seize the house as collateral. Bad assumptions. Why do you think it's called "fraudclosure"? Because the banks are operating outside the law in order to manipulate and intimidate. If they could do it correctly and legally they would, they can't, so what does that tell you? Never forget, the owner owns the house, the bank only owns your promise to pay, and the proof is in holding that original signed note.
I owned a company that did this for a rather large financial institution. I oversaw probably 50,000 of these "Initial Secures". Is it legal? If the paperwork is done correctly, yes. Is the paperwork done correctly 100% of the time? No. In order to secure the rights to the mortgage insurance, they must meet certain guidelines set forth by HUD. The banks will secure a property if they feel it is vacant. I cant tell you how many times they got this wrong, however. How it is legal to secure a property legally before proper foreclosure procedings occur is still a mystery to me.
Once we had a slight issue which was rather scarey. The inspection team hired by the bank, rather than driving the properties and matching the defaulted loan with the correct address just said they did the work. Accordingly they matched hundreds of loans improperly, leading to many home rekeyed which were not in default or didnt belong to the bank to begin with. Its a dangerous game that most banks play loose. A couple dozen lawsuits is nothing when you have 10,000 secures to do a month. Besides, they usually just dump the blame on the contractor and let them take the hit.
You want to know how to stop this? You call the media. You have a local news crew, or at least someone who looks like a local news crew show up during the securing. All of a sudden you paperwork magically reappears and you have a VP on the phone. Its that easy.
qualification to above comment: "Not American" meant I am not a citizen of USA...did not mean it is unAmerican to feel pity
I really believe we are being taunted.
Chunga "I swear my blood pressure hit 200 PSI as I watched it".
Pacific Street Film Projects - Foreclosure Diary
Ditto my man.
Fuck, I am so fucking angry watching that. Not American, but just felt so bad for the homeowners and vitriolic hatred to the scum pig who arrested her husband and son. God America, where did it all go so pear-shaped?You guys have got to face the fact that you are at war with a fascist corporate entity that desires to enslave you. There WILL be blood.
like a rem 870 for my front door work.
There is only one remedy for this dilema and most folks are just not quite ready, not hungry enough, not cold enough to do what needs to be done. No pitchforks and torches just yet but that day, that day quickly approaches...
Until that day then...
The first boom will be someone kicking down my front door. The second boom will be me and my .357 knocking him back out the door into the yard. Word.
Does Castle Doctrine apply if you do not own the damn house?
Funny you should say that considering the Indiana Supreme Court overturned the Magna Carta last week.
http://nation.foxnews.com/indiana/2011/05/16/court-no-right-resist-unlawful-police-entry
link to ruling...
www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/05121101shd.pdf
"We hold that there is no right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers."
After disabling Habeus Corpus, I am not surprised.
As a homeowner, I feel it would be my right to defend my "castle".
However, if I am in forfeiture with the house, it is not legally mine.
This crying over the big bad banks making me sign a note to live in a house I could never afford is bullshit.
You own it or the guy you pledged the property to in case of non payment does. If I lent you the money and you did not pay me for six month's, it should be my legal right to show up with a gun to MY house and tell you to GTFO.
Maybe they can give Bill Daley a call - he's tight with dem dere banksters, he can help Holder decide what should be done (i.e. nothing.....hard to raise a billion for your re-election when your kicking da banksters arses)
Part 2
Stop doing business with these crooked banks. Get to a credit union or local community bank!
I suggested several times, a NATIONAL stop paying your mortgage event! If everyone stops paying, these crooked banks go away for good.
Guns of Brixton Lyrics
Review The Song (12) Print the LyricsArtist(Band):The Clash
Send "Guns of Brixton" Ringtones to Cell
When they kick out your front door
How you gonna come?
With your hands on your head
Or on the trigger of your gun
When the law break in
How you gonna go?
Shot down on the pavement
Or waiting in death row
You can crush us
You can bruise us
But you'll have to answer to
Oh, Guns of Brixton
The money feels good
And your life you like it well
But surely your time will come
As in heaven, as in hell
You see, he feels like Ivan
BORN under the Brixton sun
His game is called survivin'
At the end of the harder they come
You know it means no mercy
They caught him with a gun
No need for the Black Maria
Goodbye to the Brixton sun
You can crush us
You can bruise us
But you'll have to answer to
Oh-the guns of Brixton
When they kick out your front door
How you gonna come?
With your hands on your head
Or on the trigger of your gun
You can crush us
You can bruise us
And even shoot us
But oh- the guns of Brixton
Shot down on the pavement
Waiting in death row
His game was survivin'
As in heaven as in hell
You can crush us
You can bruise us
But you'll have to answer to
Oh, the guns of Brixton
Oh, the guns of Brixton
Oh, the guns of Brixton
Oh, the guns of Brixton
Oh, the guns of Brixton
sung by the lovely paul! i did not realize zh readers had such taste!
How do you fix this problem? When they break down your door and step in, CAP THEIR ASS!!!! Shoot first ask questions later. You thought it was an intruder. If you shoot them all at the door, then there is no one left to lie about what happened. Hey, you didn't know who they were, they didn't identify themselves, and you shot them all.
I bet that gets things changed!
This will end badly. I promise that. You can call her a deadbeat all you want. If she bought at the peak. She has lost at least 1/2 the value of the home. I/E $400k is now $200k. No way to recover from that in her life time. Her fault alone? Hell no. Everyone involved needs to share in the blaim. If I were a preservation company in FL I would be very careful. The castle doctrine is the law here. Try to take my car with me in it and no notification. Your dead. My home with me in it. I wil give you a choice of caliber.
People looking to assign blaim here are crazy. There is plenty of blaim to go around. The fact that the TBTF have not shared in the blaim is criminal. They need to share. Take responsibility because the only reason there is a BofA or JPM is thanks to the tax payers and the gov. The Gov needs to share in the pain as well.
None of that will happen. This will turn into .gov vs citizen vs bank. It will end in tears for all. I guarantee this prediction!
More bullshit ... and the only one to blame is YOU - get a spellchecker, fool, and learn to use it. Oh, you're not that skilled ?? I do believe that, and little else about your pathetic post - (pathetic = miserably inadequate ... you won't have to find your dictionary and look it up now)
Everyone involved needs to share in the blaim...
Why is this so hard to understand? The banks took the 1st deed of trust and combined it with the promissory note at signing. The purchaser entrusted the lending institution would maintain possession of both with the deed to be returned at the time the payment terms of the promissory note were fulfilled.
Problem is, the lending institution separated the deed from the note and peddled it off as aseperate asset with other deeds knowing it could never be retrieved and returned at the future date. Once the bank broke trust, the promissory note no longer needed to be serviced as the contract was at that point null and void.
No amount of robo-signing can repair their misdeeds. 3x fines will be a good start, but these institutions have caused irreparable damage to the GF&C of the US middle class and need to be exterminated. imo.
another Ruby Ridge--in the works?
A thousand.
If someone enters, or attempts to enter, my property forcibly without just warrant being peaceably submitted, no matter their clothing hardware or number, I will shoot to kill. I don't care what anyone says or thinks about, that's just the way it is; on the pain of my life if necessary. This woman should have done so as well. She let herself be a victim, and these are not the times for that.
Easy to get into Crabby Cake's crib, but very difficult to get out...
Not really. Gurneys have 4 wheels.
she sounds like a whiney little bitch. after the first unlawful break-in you would think she would have enough brains to learn about her lawful self-defense options and get proper training. she thinks the local police are going to protect her? bwahahahaha.
we all have guns in Maine....and we have neighbors with guns....and we have cell phones.
no bank is breaking into houses here....
None of this owuld have happened had banks stuck to the historic requirment of at least 20% down.
Combination of greed on so many levels....banks, Wall Street and the Zero Down buyers and Flippers.
Except of course where values are down over 50%, like Phoenix where 68% of homeowners are "underwater" in their homes. My original 2007 LTV was 55%, if I were to sell now it would have to be a short sale. The market continues to collapse, because the banksters don't care what the REO properties sell for (they are covered by GSE and taxpayers). The death spiral in real estate will continue. Charles Hugh Smith laid it all out in this must read article:
http://www.oftwominds.com/blogmar11/phase-shift-housing3-11.html
Banks are like water, they always seek their level. If 20% were required, they would find a way around it.
Case in point: China clamps down on land deals, and people start doing business in leases on copper holdings. There is no stopping greed during a latter stage bubble mania. Banks will always be more clever than gov't.
Something has changed, but how could it be greed? We have always had greed. Our genes are no different than before. Greed is not what changed. Greed explains nothing.
It is even less logical to claim that greed is why banks gave loans to people who couldn't pay them back, which means the banks knew they would lose lots of money on those loans and be stuck with houses worth less than before when the bubble popped.
Greed explains nothing.
Greed is a simple minded explanation.
"which means the banks knew they would lose lots of money on those loans"
I respectfully disagree with this supposition. It's my belief that they knew quite the opposite, created the environment that fed the beast, and acted in a systemic manner that benefited few but resulted in harm to many.
If you look a little deeper you may come to realize a "non-performing" loan has become a perverted financial innovation that is worth much more than a "performing" loan.
Go figure...
Thanks chunga,
Perhaps you can then point me to the article that clearly exposes the smoking gun.
Exactly who are "they"?
Exactly how is a non-performing loan worth more than a performing loan?
Thanks, again.
It's ironic but it appears to me the "servicers", more often than not with no skin in the game, have been the biggest impediment to an equitable solution.
I'm going to plagiarize here -- but it's ok. I'm plagiarizing myself. It's late and I have to get up early so all I can offer now is a paste. This is a cliff notes version of my take on the situation. Take it for what it's worth.
I guess now would be a good time to shoot the greedy homeowners.
Such pretty words and prolific sarcasm don't really help to be clear, but if I understand what you're implying ...
It sounds like the problem then is the one I already suspected. The banks (including many foreign banks) expected US taxpayer bailouts like TARP and FDIC bailouts.
Without the expectation of bailouts, CDOs and CDSs would be harmless - even helpful. Without the expectation of bailouts, CEOs would have been fired - never to work again.
It sounds like government corrupted our financial system, but why? Politicians officially made none of the profits, so it wasn't exactly greed.
Are the banks really selling those houses at a profit? Are the banks paying property taxes on those houses?
Didn't the Bank Modernization Act signed by Clinton allow banks to bypass realtors and some closing costs when selling properties they owned, which is good, but which would now be especially beneficial when unloading a glut of houses, which would have never happened without the expectation of bailouts.
A majority of the people opposed the bailouts, and a majority of Republicans voted against the bailouts, so how did they happen? Was the Democratic Party finishing the plan begun by Clinton? And why?
Now I think you are pulling my leg. Key the words "Foreclosure Fraud" into your favorite search engine and see what pops up. Google presents 16.6 million hits. I'm suspicious of anyone who cites the CRA. If you think for a minute that anybody in the govt./wall street house flipping racket gives two shits about minorities you're nuts.
Sign the damn paper and welcome to the American Dream. Table fund the "loan", slice and dice, leverage every last piece of it, then act surprised when the "shitty deal" explodes. (I'll take my bailout now please.) This "shitty deal" was so big there was room in there for everybody.
There are two sides to every deal. One side got rich. The other side got a haircut - with a weed wacker. As a bonus, the side that got rich also skipped out on paying taxes. See REMIC.
Neil Garfield explains it quite nicely in this video
Were you replying to me? I ask because I never mentioned nor implied anything about the CRA.
Some people make a lot of money honestly and some people lose a lot of money honestly. Looking at who made money and who lost money doesn't explain why. Also, AIG, Fannie Mae, and banks themselves lost huge - except for government bailouts. Several of them no longer exist.
I'll take a look at REMIC and the video.
+200 million, except you left out congress and the minority home ownership acts that got the ball really rolling
dp
Obviously this woman has not heard of Smith and Wesson.
Hell yeah!!!!!!!!
However, Smittywesson has moved onto a Saiga-12. Properly doctured, this AK-47 chambered in 12 gauge will spit out 8 rounds of single O buck in 2.1 seconds, with almost no recoil. Inasmuch as there are 12 30 calibre pellets in single O buck, that's 96 30 calibre rounds down range in 2.1 seconds. I can now shut my eyes, scream like a little girl, and hit whatever is even remotely in front of me. Woot, bring on dem zombie fellers!
"It's not a gunfight if you don't have to replace your furniture" - Smiddy
I do like the Saiga's proven semi-auto design, but Keltec has a new shotgun in development that is driving the ATF nuts. Bullpup design, 14+1 capacity, perhaps the perfect HOME (bankster) defense gun?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvBRgpjWub4
I can't imagine Hoosiers will put up with this for long, problem is, the appeal will be heard by SCOTUS, which as you remember has a chief justice who likes to expand his rulings. Case in point "Citizens United". By the time is passes through these idiots, they'll just go ahead and declare martial law. Show us your papers!
pay your mortgage, deadbeats. No sympathy. Break down the doors and throw them out on their asses.
zero. your a loser
typical Bill Daley, Holder, Obama guy for ya
if you're referring to the sleazy lenders and RE "professionals" who helped get people in houses they knew they couldn't afford, for the commissions, and the investment bankers who built synthetics to fool other suckers that the risk was hedged, or our "esteemed" representatives and agency folks in the exec branch, then heck yes -- break down the doors and throw them out on their arses. If not, then fuck you.
/shoots zerohenge in the eyes because he cant read anyway.
Just like our soldiers did along with millions of others???
J.P. Morgan Apologizes for Military ForeclosuresOr how about people that were current or did not even have a mortgage???
Sorry, just can't stop! SO MANY TO CHOOSE FROM!
More: http://4closurefraud.org/2010/05/04/t...
More: http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/fo...
More: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/17/opi...
More: http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/target...
More: http://www.oregonlive.com/business/or...
What say you now?
"apologized for wrongly foreclosing on military families and overcharging thousands for mortgages, as lawmakers weigh whether new legislation is needed to help prevent military personnel from losing their homes and getting hit with high interest rates."
Rome did that, but it didnt' work out too well, did it? The low brow idiots today think "barbarians" ended Rome, but screwing their own citizens, especially miliary returning from wars to find their homes gone, swelled the ranks of the "barbarians" with Roman citizens.