Wall Street Protest: Time for Conservative Endorsements
Big Liberal Endorsements for Wall Street Protest
Given that numerous unions (and see this) and progressive luminaries like Cornell West, Michael Moore, Bernie Sanders and Russel Simmons are joining the Wall Street protest, this may be painted by some as a “left-wing movement”.
Conservatives Support Protests
Of course, United Airlines pilots are not a particularly liberal group, but they joined in.
Indeed, conservatives such as Dylan Ratigan, Karl Denninger, and supporters of Ron Paul have also joined in to the protests.
The Divide-And-Conquer Technique Is Failing
I’ve repeatedly warned that there is a scripted, psuedo-war between
Dems and Repubs, liberals and conservatives which is in reality a
false divide-and-conquer dog-and-pony show created by the powers
that be to keep the American people divided and distracted. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this. (In fact, the Founding Fathers warned us about the threat from a two party system.)
The Tea Party was quickly co-opted by the Republican Party:
Remember that one of the founders of the Tea Party – Karl Denninger – has slammed
the current Tea Party (which was quickly co-opted by the mainstream
GOP) for serving the rich and the Republican party instead of fighting
against the giant banks, and is calling for non-partisan, Gandhi-style nonviolent resistance to take on the banskters.
Don’t let the Wall Street protests get hijacked by the mainstream Democratic Party.
Time for Big Conservative Endorsements
This is not a liberal or a conservative cause … it is both.
It is time for some big conservative endorsements, to rally around the non-partisan issues important to all Americans.
The Tea Party should endorse the protests, but so should the Oath
Keepers, taxpayer rights groups, conservative Christians, limited
government groups, and all other conservative groups.
A sign from the Wall Street protest shows that the people on the ground get it:
(25 votes)
»
- George Washington's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 8444 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
Thank you so much for this article GW and Tyler. I've gone out on a limb in supporting this and I've definitely caused somewhat of a sh*tstorm.
We have seen the enemy, and the enemy is NOT our fellow Americans. The very idea that we might actually be able to find common ground between the left/right orchestrated divide is scaring the pants off the establishment. That is their worst nightmare.
An Open Letter From FedUpUSA To Occupy Wall Street Protestors All Over The Country
" out beyond ideas of wrong doing and right doing
there is a field . i'll meet you there. when the soul lies down
in that grass the world is too full to talk about.
ideas, language, even the phrase
"each other" doesn't make sense anymore. " rumi
Protesters...
tempted to work in darkness
the deceived show up compromised
...and everybody pays
ha ha haa
...pay to arrest the beast
Labor was long aborted
...before
...before the blood
...before the blood of the aborted would ever flow on
Wall Street
...Wall Street
Jesters
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ0mvzx2Z2E&feature=related
Guest Post: Occupy Philadelphia is a Jewish Zionist COINTELPRO Operation
---
On Monday, the Metro, a free corporate daily distributed in the City of Brotherly Love announced on its cover the inaugural meeting of "Occupy Philadelphia".
This newspaper regularly features CNN correspondent columns, the cartoon version of any domestic and international fear campaigns, and 50% sports filler. So has it suddenly betrayed its state corporate propaganda function, in favor of the bongo drummers and vegan pizza munching masses?
I cringed at the fishy contradiction, and decided to avoid the affair. On Thursday, however, a bright-eyed rainbow-clad activist mentioned the meeting time and location to me, and despite my suspicions, I went.
A crowd of about 50 people mulled around Philadelphia's anarchist bookstore, and at 6:00pm the location was announced at a historic church in the city center some 15 blocks away. By the time we reached City Hall, the parade had swelled to more than 100, and chanting had begun.
Our promenade was faciliated by an unmarked beige car, manned by glowering men in suits and sunglasses, who blocked traffic on the busiest streets of the city. We then crouched our heads to enter the religious chambers. When the proceedings were finally inaugurated in front of the altar, we had swelled to more than 200 people, including a professional television crew.
After a few minutes, listening to procedural reports from Occupy Wall Street, a debate broke out over whether to use "stack" or "progressive stack". The progressive flavor, we learned, would place minorities and women ahead of other eager speakers. A white kid disagreed, and told us were all equal.
A compromise was finally reached between the affirmative action proceduralists, and the supporters of an arbitrary order -- and the church erupted into twinkling hands of democratic glee.
I knew then for certain, that the entire operation was a set-up.
While I observed the next two hours of painful, bright-eyed futility, the malicious cynicism of this particular counter intelligence operation grew brighter and brighter.
Every single leader of this operation was a self-deprecating homosexual and/or lesbian and/or Jew. I recognized the clique from the tyrannical pseudo-democracy organized around saving Philadelphia's libraries two years ago.
What a strange coincidence, a whiteish spread of the US population, sitting in church pews on the Jewish Day of Judgment, with a mid-20s Jewish ringleader who contemptuously dismissed the hierarchical "vibe" of Christian symbolism.
He also effeminately play-acts exasperation and whines over his falsely claimed inexperience, "if somebody else wants to do this, please", and then tyrannically persists in dominating the entire gathering with his scrawny cohorts -- despite the impassioned seizure of attention by a long-time Puerto Rican activist and African American youth.
All of the non-Jewish, non-White minorities who spoke insisted we first discuss why we were there, what we were protesting, and who we wanted to reach by our likely illegal activity. The faux-populist leadership would have nothing of that back-talk, and instead condescendingly sympathized, "everyone deserves an opinion".
By the time the painful confusion over how we had spent 2 hours together with hundreds of angry and activated Americans, and yet had managed to accomplish not a single decision or even open discussion -- we were scolded to "trust the process" by the enlightened, and now, all of a sudden, coordinated and expert Jewish managers at the Christian altar.
Everyone had become so exhausted from frustration, that they scurried like rats behind the grinning Jewish fag into the street for the opportunity to join the centrally controlled creation of the planning committee, to determine the agenda for the next meeting.
There's the reason why we have no protest in the United States -- the foolish white Christians, and the naive African Americans and Latinos who were present have been enslaved by the Jewish Zionist political correctness managers -- and then the rest of the world can laugh with the Wall Street Journal, who ridicules the very COINTELPRO operation their financier buddies concocted in the first place.
http://www.metro.us/philadelphia/local/article/980233--occupy-philadelph...
this is interesting too.
Peter Schiff vs Michael Moore on #occupywallstreet & ‘capitalism’
Posted on September 30, 2011 by stacyherbert
http://maxkeiser.com/2011/09/30/peter-schiff-vs-michael-moore-on-occupyw...
.
the spirit of the people
is like honey, honey.
the youth, the youth
has the honey now.
the world will come
from afar to be in there.
in the den of their
presence. they save us
and raise us at our moment
of failure and death.
like good children becoming
gods,
with the truth,
the whole truth
, and nothing....
no debt.
( there is a big difference between paying
your bills and paying the bills of the ruling class,
spread out on you and your community.)
that structure is falling and nothing can stop it.
imo
Yep, it's not right vs. left, it's right vs. wrong. I am glad more people are getting this.
fun fact
black and white are not collors.
i support the person who denounces usury and systemic usury.
neither liberals nor conservatives will do this but those
occupying wall street do, this is why they have the spirit
and will prevail. the left and right will both try to co-opt
the spirit but as you say these people are hip to that shit
and won't fall for it. we are way too late in the game for
that. besides, accepting usury instantly kills the spirit and
the economy. this might be our big lesson?
less is more and it all makes sense. almost like preordained
or written in the bond market? notice the left and right share
a common love of the bond market, a common love of the systematic
harvesting of usury and high yield leveraging, with systematic
risk transference. they are the
same people inside speaking to garner approval from different
audiences.
here, my brother speaks to the people ...
"Trick The Bridesmaid" — a Bad Lip Reading of Barack Obama
http://www.youtube.com/user/BadLipReading
.
imo
http://maxkeiser.com/2011/09/30/max-remix/
Max Remix
Posted on September 30, 2011 by maxkeiser
.
A Better World is Possible - OllieGarkeyFollow
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/09/30/1021451/-Here-comes-the-Cavalry...
.
Global Revolution
Wall Street Occupation
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29156.htm
.
"Trick The Bridesmaid" — a Bad Lip Reading of Barack Obama
http://www.youtube.com/user/BadLipReading
The Federal Reserve is neither Federal nor a "Reserve". This private bank run by the "Bank of England" has been stripping the US of its assets since the days of Andrew Jackson. If the $16,000,000,000,000.00 given away secretly, since 2007, to the member banks isn't reason enough to overhaul our entire government financial system then our country is doomed to financial failure. You won't read this in the mainstream media....but it may emerge in the coming elections. Read about this first ever audit of the Fed and understand why we are in such trouble. Tuesday, September 27, 2011 First Ever GAO Audit Of The Federal Reserve
(You can click on the site and read the report).
The first ever GAO audit of the Federal Reserve was carried out in the past few months due to the Ron Paul, Alan Grayson Amendment to the Dodd-Frank bill, which passed last year. Jim DeMint, a Republican Senator, and Bernie Sanders, an independent Senator, led the charge for a Federal Reserve audit in the Senate, but watered down the original language of the house bill (HR1207), so that a complete audit would not be carried out. Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, and various other bankers vehemently opposed the audit and lied to Congress about the effects an audit would have on markets. Nevertheless, the results of the first audit in the Federal Reserve nearly 100 year history were posted on Senator Sanderâs webpage earlier this morning.
sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3 (Summarized below)
What was revealed in the audit was startling:
$16,000,000,000,000.00 (TRILLION) had been secretly given out to US banks and corporations and foreign banks everywhere from France to Scotland. From the period between December 2007 and June 2010, the Federal Reserve had secretly bailed out many of the worldâs banks, corporations, and governments. The Federal Reserve likes to refer to these secret bailouts as an all-inclusive loan program, but virtually none of the money has been returned and it was loaned out at 0% interest.
Why the Federal Reserve had never been public about this or even informed the United States Congress about the $16 trillion dollar bailout is obvious the American public would have been outraged to find out that the Federal Reserve bailed out foreign banks while Americans were struggling to find jobs. To place $16 trillion into perspective, remember that GDP of the United States is only $14.12 trillion. The entire national debt of the United States government spanning its 200+ year history is only $14.5 trillion.
The budget that is being debated so heavily in Congress and the Senate is only $3.5 trillion. Take all of the outrage and debate over the $1.5 trillion deficit into consideration, and swallow this Red pill: There was no debate about whether $16,000,000,000,000 would be given to failing banks and failing corporations around the world. In late 2008, the TARP Bailout bill was passed and loans of $800 billion were given to failing banks and companies. That was a blatant lie considering the fact that Goldman Sachs alone received 814 billion dollars. As is turns out, the Federal Reserve donated $2.5 trillion to Citigroup, while Morgan Stanley received $2.04 trillion. The Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank, a German bank, split about a trillion and numerous other banks received hefty chunks of the $16 trillion. ****
When you have conservative Republican stalwarts like Jim DeMint(R-SC) and Ron Paul(R-TX) as well as self-identified Democratic socialists like Bernie Sanders all fighting against the Federal Reserve, you know that it is no longer an issue of Right versus Left. When you have every single member of the Republican Party in Congress and progressive Congressmen like Dennis Kucinich sponsoring a bill to audit the Federal Reserve, you realize that the Federal Reserve is an entity onto itself, which has no oversight and no accountability.
Americans should be swelled with anger and outrage at the abysmal state of affairs when an unelected group of bankers can create money out of thin air and give it out to megabanks and super-corporations like Halloween candy.
The list of institutions which received the most money from the Federal Reserve can be found on page 131 of the GAO Audit and are as follows:
Citigroup: $2.5 trillion($2,500,000,000,000)
Morgan Stanley: $2.04 trillion ($2,040,000,000,000)
Merrill Lynch: $1.949 trillion ($1,949,000,000,000)
Bank of America: $1.344 trillion ($1,344,000,000,000)
Barclays PLC (United Kingdom): $868 billion* ($868,000,000,000)
Bear Sterns: $853 billion ($853,000,000,000)
Goldman Sachs: $814 billion ($814,000,000,000)
Royal Bank of Scotland (UK): $541 billion ($541,000,000,000)
JP Morgan Chase: $391 billion ($391,000,000,000)
Deutsche Bank (Germany): $354 billion ($354,000,000,000)
UBS (Switzerland): $287 billion ($287,000,000,000)
Credit Suisse (Switzerland): $262 billion ($262,000,000,000)
Lehman Brothers: $183 billion ($183,000,000,000)
Bank of Scotland (United Kingdom): $181 billion ($181,000,000,000)
BNP Paribas (France): $175 billion ($175,000,000,000)
IT WILL BE INTERESTING AS TO HOW MUCH ATTENTION (AS WELL AS THE SLANT) THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA GIVES THIS UNBELIEVABLE POSITION OF OUR GOVERNMENT HAS PLACED US IN WITH NEVER PREVIOUSLY HAVING AN AUDIT OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE.
I AM CONFIDENT THAT WE WILL HEAR SOMETHING LIKE THE FED HAD TO GIVE STIMULUS TO WHOM THE $16 TRILLION WENT TOO BECAUSE IF WE HAD NOT ALLOWED THIS IT WOULD BE THEIR COLLAPSE AND THE OURS.
HAS ANYONE EVER HEARD OF CLOWARD AND PIVEN ECONOMICS? (PARAPHRASING) IT INVOLVES TWO HARVARD PROFESSORS WHOSE BOOK SAID TO CHANGE ANY GOVERNMENTâS ECONOMIC SYSTEM INTO A SOCIALIST ONE, IT SIMPLY DRIVES THEIR ECONOMY INTO THE DITCH THEN THE CITIZENS ALLOW THE GOVERNMENT TO DO WHAT THEY WISH TO SAVE THEM
The Federal Reserve is neither Federal nor a "Reserve". This private bank run by the "Bank of England" has been stripping the US of its assets since the days of Andrew Jackson. If the $16,000,000,000,000.00 given away secretly, since 2007, to the member banks isn't reason enough to overhaul our entire government financial system then our country is doomed to financial failure. You won't read this in the mainstream media....but it may emerge in the coming elections. Read about this first ever audit of the Fed and understand why we are in such trouble. Tuesday, September 27, 2011 First Ever GAO Audit Of The Federal Reserve
(You can click on the site and read the report).
The first ever GAO audit of the Federal Reserve was carried out in the past few months due to the Ron Paul, Alan Grayson Amendment to the Dodd-Frank bill, which passed last year. Jim DeMint, a Republican Senator, and Bernie Sanders, an independent Senator, led the charge for a Federal Reserve audit in the Senate, but watered down the original language of the house bill (HR1207), so that a complete audit would not be carried out. Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, and various other bankers vehemently opposed the audit and lied to Congress about the effects an audit would have on markets. Nevertheless, the results of the first audit in the Federal Reserve nearly 100 year history were posted on Senator Sanderâs webpage earlier this morning.
sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4be2-a753-62060dcbb3c3 (Summarized below)
What was revealed in the audit was startling:
$16,000,000,000,000.00 (TRILLION) had been secretly given out to US banks and corporations and foreign banks everywhere from France to Scotland. From the period between December 2007 and June 2010, the Federal Reserve had secretly bailed out many of the worldâs banks, corporations, and governments. The Federal Reserve likes to refer to these secret bailouts as an all-inclusive loan program, but virtually none of the money has been returned and it was loaned out at 0% interest.
Why the Federal Reserve had never been public about this or even informed the United States Congress about the $16 trillion dollar bailout is obvious the American public would have been outraged to find out that the Federal Reserve bailed out foreign banks while Americans were struggling to find jobs. To place $16 trillion into perspective, remember that GDP of the United States is only $14.12 trillion. The entire national debt of the United States government spanning its 200+ year history is only $14.5 trillion.
The budget that is being debated so heavily in Congress and the Senate is only $3.5 trillion. Take all of the outrage and debate over the $1.5 trillion deficit into consideration, and swallow this Red pill: There was no debate about whether $16,000,000,000,000 would be given to failing banks and failing corporations around the world. In late 2008, the TARP Bailout bill was passed and loans of $800 billion were given to failing banks and companies. That was a blatant lie considering the fact that Goldman Sachs alone received 814 billion dollars. As is turns out, the Federal Reserve donated $2.5 trillion to Citigroup, while Morgan Stanley received $2.04 trillion. The Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank, a German bank, split about a trillion and numerous other banks received hefty chunks of the $16 trillion. ****
When you have conservative Republican stalwarts like Jim DeMint(R-SC) and Ron Paul(R-TX) as well as self-identified Democratic socialists like Bernie Sanders all fighting against the Federal Reserve, you know that it is no longer an issue of Right versus Left. When you have every single member of the Republican Party in Congress and progressive Congressmen like Dennis Kucinich sponsoring a bill to audit the Federal Reserve, you realize that the Federal Reserve is an entity onto itself, which has no oversight and no accountability.
Americans should be swelled with anger and outrage at the abysmal state of affairs when an unelected group of bankers can create money out of thin air and give it out to megabanks and super-corporations like Halloween candy.
The list of institutions which received the most money from the Federal Reserve can be found on page 131 of the GAO Audit and are as follows:
Citigroup: $2.5 trillion($2,500,000,000,000)
Morgan Stanley: $2.04 trillion ($2,040,000,000,000)
Merrill Lynch: $1.949 trillion ($1,949,000,000,000)
Bank of America: $1.344 trillion ($1,344,000,000,000)
Barclays PLC (United Kingdom): $868 billion* ($868,000,000,000)
Bear Sterns: $853 billion ($853,000,000,000)
Goldman Sachs: $814 billion ($814,000,000,000)
Royal Bank of Scotland (UK): $541 billion ($541,000,000,000)
JP Morgan Chase: $391 billion ($391,000,000,000)
Deutsche Bank (Germany): $354 billion ($354,000,000,000)
UBS (Switzerland): $287 billion ($287,000,000,000)
Credit Suisse (Switzerland): $262 billion ($262,000,000,000)
Lehman Brothers: $183 billion ($183,000,000,000)
Bank of Scotland (United Kingdom): $181 billion ($181,000,000,000)
BNP Paribas (France): $175 billion ($175,000,000,000)
IT WILL BE INTERESTING AS TO HOW MUCH ATTENTION (AS WELL AS THE SLANT) THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA GIVES THIS UNBELIEVABLE POSITION OF OUR GOVERNMENT HAS PLACED US IN WITH NEVER PREVIOUSLY HAVING AN AUDIT OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE.
I AM CONFIDENT THAT WE WILL HEAR SOMETHING LIKE THE FED HAD TO GIVE STIMULUS TO WHOM THE $16 TRILLION WENT TOO BECAUSE IF WE HAD NOT ALLOWED THIS IT WOULD BE THEIR COLLAPSE AND THE OURS.
HAS ANYONE EVER HEARD OF CLOWARD AND PIVEN ECONOMICS? (PARAPHRASING) IT INVOLVES TWO HARVARD PROFESSORS WHOSE BOOK SAID TO CHANGE ANY GOVERNMENTâS ECONOMIC SYSTEM INTO A SOCIALIST ONE, IT SIMPLY DRIVES THEIR ECONOMY INTO THE DITCH THEN THE CITIZENS ALLOW THE GOVERNMENT TO DO WHAT THEY WISH TO SAVE THEM
The first Tea Party was actually a revolt against crony capitalism:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/15-10
Yes, this is on what could be called a socialist site, so they took it as just as a protest against a multi-national corporation, but what was at the heart of that issue was the preferential treatment of that corporation by the British government. The problem is that huge multinational corporations eventually gain the power to buy governments, something that was apparently true even back in the 1700s under a monarchy.
Anti-monopoply
Funnty how the enforcement of antimonopoly laws in the US has pretty much come to a halt since Saint Ronnie (under both Republican and Democratic administrations)
And it is the political class that must be held accountable. We must demand representation that is in our best interest. The only credible voices I can find who offer rational representation come from the right. It isn't that guys like Kunich are bad people. I actually have some respect for him. The political left today though is stuck in some bizarre fantasy. The movement has rotted and is little more now than a bunch of thoroughly corrupt ex hippies who deceive a bunch of public educated TV heads in order to maintain their own personal positions among the American elite while striving to fit in among the uber elite who plot world government.
Sad really.
it really is time for a general strike. i am a utu conductor and know many union men in a varity of crafts, we can get the attention of the powers that be if we simply cut the cities off.
I am a conservative independent and also approve this GW message!!
Guys..it's just us against them.THAT's ALL THERE IS !!
Thank you, sir ...
Dylan Ratigan a conservative? Not!
Dylan wants greater government involvement in public education...I didn't even think it was possible, but here he is promoting it with a guest.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/alex-fitzsimmons/2010/07/20/dylan-ratigan-shouts-down-conservative-guest-objecting-liberal-dog
Dylan wants greater government involvement in commercial banking via a nationalized infrastructure bank (think Solyndra type loans on steroids).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gIcqb9hHQ3E
Dylan Ratigan a conservative??? Pahlease!
Ratigan is about as Conservative as was the Bush boys. Daddy got to be the very first NWO prez though. Quite the family honor I'm sure.
He sees himself as a libertarian. Somebody ambiguously referred to "us liberals" on his show today and he almost choked . . . and almost choked her.
"God, guns and gays". Those were the 3 elements of the "divide and conquer" strategy. The Repubs would use these and get even Dems to vote for them. Remeber the "Reagan Democrat"?? This is how that term came about. Folks voted against their own economic self-interest b/c of morality issues. Not that the Repubs truly cared about those things, it's just that it made for good voter turnouts. Queers now get married, abortion is still legal, and guns are everywhere. Hopefully people have awakened. Dems would use their own little issues to deliver their constituency to Wall Street, even while screwing their own voters in the ass (sans lube). Clinton signed NAFTA, after all. And when is the last time you heard a feminist issue raised?? Or a racial one?Looks like the little sluts got taken for a ride, and minorities are still falling behind. There is NO DIFFERENCE between the parties. Anyone that disagrees with that is beyond hope. Both parties are corrupt and beholded to Wall Street.
Right about the parties. But parties only change with participation. I feel like it is generally safe to assume that the average ZH poster is brighter than average and so a history lesson isn't required. Different agenda's at different historical periods.
I propose that the solution is to reduce the power and influence of the federal government. It is a fucking whorehouse, so shut it down. Lots of 'indigo' types are calling for a return to locality. I see that as well. The nasty corruption committed against the American people by our political class is truly and absolutely RAPE in the very worst, most pathological, sociopath sort of way .
It is ideology that you ought to study and focus on because the parties are fluid. Wasn't that long ago that Democrats were actually Liberals. They only recently were bought out by the Communist/progressives ( What? Wanna say BS?, well instead why not just be who you really are and offer a defense? Seriously the lying doesn't help at all, and it really makes a few of us a bit Leary of you, state your case. 'school us'. Teach us to fish?)
Anyway, I hate the Hegelian dialectic too but at the end of the day we get what we were willing to work for. And because of our fucking laziness we have what we have.
Most on ZH already know this, but the word IDIOT is really kinda special.
http://www.huginn.com/knuth/blog/2007/11/22/origin-of-the-word-idiot/
I approve of this rant. Spot on.
This is not about Repbug/Demcrap sh!t. The divide/win strategy works if you let it. FUKK Wall Street, and many thanks to the brave folks there letting the .01% know what the "rest of us" think. Not that "they" are going to. BTW don't drive thru my "fly over" street, because the "hot metal" may not do too well with your limo.
0.01% don't listen to lowerings. They think you are where you are because everything is your own personal fault including the fact that your parents were not born to right grandparents who passed down wealth.
Only way to get Ripoffblicans trust fund babyboomers who are so self-righteous of their entitled position in society from inheritance is to take away that privilege. Let their homes burn and prove they can build it on their own.
Please, come to my neighborhood and try to burn down my house. I'd love to see that.
It would be really terrific to see the look on your face in the security camera footage, especially when you realize a bit too late that Republicans own guns, too. Lots of them. And we damn well know how to use them.
you must be one of those stupid republicans who want to maintain the status quo becuase Republicans have given you false sense of "wealth" but make no mistake, you are still one of the 99.9% serf class and 0.1% would not consider you anything more than a serf. You, your family, your children, your grandchildren....all serfs for the use of glorious elites. The food you eat, the choices you have, the work you do, what you hear and learn on TV..... you live under the rules set by the ruling class.
What good is a gun when you are missing the brain to think? You are pointing the gun at yourself you fool...to keep you enslaved. and you are playing right into the tricks of the elites: divide and conquer.
Do you understand how the following works?
Let the idiot 50% point and kill the other 49.9% for the profit of the 0.1%.
I dont know if you've been to any local republican meetings lately but they could have a 50 cal perched on a window and I wouldn't be that scared. Bunch of Country club republicans. Just look at the presidential nominees, none of them look like they could carry a gun... Except for Perry who exemplifies everything they want to be so bad they ignore is ridicoulous politics.
Third party needed desperately.
New country needed desperately...MonTexoming
but can they dance
Who are the big financial donors to the Tea Party? Curious minds want to know.
Who are the big financial donors to the Tea Party? Curious minds want to know.
Res ipsa loquitur...the thing speaks for itself:
No better evidence of your complete lack of comprehension of what the Tea Party is all about than your question.
Most came from small donors. LOTS came from the Koch brothers AFTER the movement had already begun to form from the grassroots level. The Koch brothers are of course widely demonized and to some degree correctly because the do have crony tendencies. They also are one of the largest (2nd, I believe) private employers in the nation. The reality is that the Tea Party began in response to bailing out wall street and outrage regarding the profoundly irresponsible deficit spending by the regime government. To claim that the Tea Party has been co-opted by the Republican establishment is dubious at best. No doubt the effort has been and is being made but the reality is obvious. The Tea Party reps are squeezing the house and are a large part of the reason that national focus on the deficit has become mainstream.
It is beyond me how anyone who claims to be alarmed by the ruinous path that the regime government has set us all on could do anything other than support the Tea Party.
The clowns occupying wall street are just a bunch of useful idiots of the political left attempting to hijack public anger toward the ponzi. Best part is that they want MORE ponzi, not less.
"Best part is that they want MORE ponzi, not less."
dude, that's just flat out incorrect. there's a critical mass of people there who understand exactly the mechanisms of the ponzi and who it really benefits just as clearly as you and i do. sure there's some lingering outdated leftist ideologies, just like there was lingering outdated right-wing ideologies at the tea party rallies last year.
as far as 0 is concerned, i don't recall any protest at all coming from the right back when Bush was about to run for a 2nd term. none, nada, zero, zip, diddly. now who's the useful idiots again?
MORE ponzi? Not what I see from news. Message is about corporate greed. Tea Party should be there, or tea party should protest Federal Reserve.
Grow a brain. The Ponzi IS your government fool. Military/Industrial complex genius.
Think G.E. smart one.
You know.... the Jeffery Immelt thingy?
The reason I mock these poor sods is that they are either clueless or diabolical. Most likely is that the dumb-asses hanging out for obama on the street are merely clueless regime tools. The diabolical ones drop in for a visit from time to time and run blogs encouraging even more useful idiots to join those on the streets.
At the end of the day this reeks of a collaborative effort between the regime and various tentacles it has into the leftist underworld.
Or maybe it's just an innocent coincidence that president dumbnuts goes all campaign mode/class warfare promotin' and a bunch of clueless tools decide to protest wallstreet rather than the elected peons who do the actual dirty work for the bankers?
Its not that damn difficult to connect the dots, the establishment political left is terrified of having the Ponzi fully exposed and so is attempting to divert attention to one small segment of the Ponzi in the hope that in so doing the remainder will be kept safe to feed off of.
I'll begin supporting the protest when the demonstrations are in front of the FED and have the stated goal of ending the Ponzi.
The message may be "about corporate greed", but that's not the problem, the problem is corporate greed that fails and gets bailed out. It's the whole purpose of the centralized banking system. JPM was institutional in creating it, and has been getting the largess from it all the way back to when they were going to lose their asses on war lending to France and England until they manipulated us into spending a quarter of a million of our boys to go help collect in the trenches of WWI Europe...
JPM is the devils ATM machine on earth...
tea party had good intentions but was hijacked by the moneyed class to distract the common folk to being about healthcare instead of focusing on wall st. bailouts.
What exactly are "the common folk"? Are you one of them?
And what is the purpose of the healthcare law - to provide a service? or to further the statist-dependency construct?
A wise man once said not to complain about a traffic jam you find yourself in when you're part of the problem. Modus vivendi is unattainable without a rigorous sifting out of liberally applied misperceptions.
"tea party had good intentions but was hijacked..."
You're less than worthless. How much have your premiums gone up this year alone?
Edit: And shall we go back in time and look at the actual roll call vote tally to bail out the banks and look at who voted for what in both Houses?
I thought not.
That would be the Koch Bros.
That would be the Koch Bros.
Chuck Barris just jumped over J.P. Morgan and gonged you. Try again.
aka The John Birch Society.
The Koch's are brilliant. They financially take over the group they are are about to devour. Blue Collar White folks. These folks are too obsessed with dressing up in revolutionary costumes, packing heat for show in public to realize they are not the revolution. They have been and will continue to be the main course at the one percent's moveable feast. Tragic, ironic but, classic in terms of empire collapse.
yes, hijack the passion then redirect it elsewhere.
Soros tried the same strategy with Palin. Divide the ripoffblicans into true wealthy 0.1% and the rest of common folk.
Ripoffblicans might split into Tea Party for the poor blue collar and Libertarian for the trust fund babies
Democracts might split into educated professional progressives and the really poor underclass of Mexican nationals.
"Educated professional progressives"???
Isn't that an oxymoron?
For the top .1% it's spot on but for everybody else then, yeah, it's an oxymoron.
You know who really needs to play at this thing is Rage Against the Machine
"As the polls close like a casket
On truth devoured
A Silent play in the shadow of power
A spectacle monopolized
The camera’s eyes on choice disguised
Was it cast for the mass who burn and toil?
Or for the vultures who thirst for blood and oil?
Yes a spectacle monopolized
They hold the reins and stole your eyes
Or the fistagons
The bullets and bombs
Who stuff the banks
Who staff the party ranks
More for Gore or the son of a drug lord
None of the above fuck it cut the cord
It has to start somewhere It has to start sometime
What better place than here, what better time than now?"
I second that, and they would probably do it if asked.
I am conservative and I approve of this message.