This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Conservatives and Liberals Agree: End the Malignant, Symbiotic Relationship Between Big Government and Big Corporations

George Washington's picture




 

While many pretend that liberals and conservatives are too far apart to work together, there are actually many issues on which everyone can agree.

For example, both liberals and conservatives hate  the malignant, symbiotic relationship between big government and big corporations:

Conservatives tend to view big government with suspicion, and think that government should be held accountable and reined in.

 

Liberals tend to view big corporations with suspicion, and think that they should be held accountable and reined in.

 

***

 

Conservatives hate big unfettered government and liberals hate big unchecked corporations, so both hate legislation which encourages the federal government to reward big corporations at the expense of small businesses.

Most Americans – whether they are conservative or liberal – are disgusted that virtually all of the politicians are bought and paid for. No wonder people of all stripes have lost all trust in our government.

And everyone hates government-enabled fraud. The big banks, of course, committed massive fraud. But the auditors, rating agencies and regulators also all committed fraud, which helped blow the bubble and sowed the seeds of the inevitable crash.

Indeed:

Both liberals and conservatives are angry that the feds are propping up the giant banks – while letting small banks fail by the hundreds – even though that is horrible for the economy and Main Street.

 

The Dodd-Frank financial legislation wasn’t a compromise where things landed somewhere in the middle between liberal and conservatives ideas. Instead, it enshrines big government propping up the big banks … more or less permanently.

 

Many liberals and conservatives look at the government’s approach to the financial crisis as socialism for the rich and free market capitalism for the little guy. No wonder both liberals and conservatives hate it.

 

And it’s not just the big banks. Americans are angry that the federal government under both Bush and Obama have handed giant defense contractors like Blackwater and Halliburton no-bid contracts. [And Solyndra and other solar companies]. They are mad that – instead of cracking down on BP – the government has acted like BP’s p.r. spokesman-in-chief and sugar daddy.

 

They are peeved that companies like Monsanto are able to sell genetically modified foods without any disclosure, and that small farmers are getting sued when Monsanto crops drift onto their fields.

 

They are mad that Obama promised “change” – i.e. standing up to Wall Street and the other powers-that-be – but is just delivering more of the same.

 

They are furious that there is no separation between government and a handful of favored giant corporations. [Indeed, Ben Bernanke has handed out more presents than Santa Claus to McDonald's Harley-Davidson, hedge funds  and others.]  In other words, Americans are angry that we’ve gone from capitalism to oligarchy.

As I noted Sunday:

The corrupt, giant banks would never have gotten so big and powerful on their own. In a free market, the leaner banks with sounder business models would be growing, while the giants who made reckless speculative gambles would have gone bust. See this, this and this.

 

It is the Federal Reserve, Treasury and Congress who have repeatedly bailed out the big banks, ensured they make money at taxpayer expense, exempted them from standard accounting practices and the criminal and fraud laws which govern the little guy, encouraged insane amounts of leverage, and enabled the too big to fail banks – through “moral hazard” – to become even more reckless.

 

Indeed, the government made them big in the first place. As I noted in 2009:

As MIT economics professor and former IMF chief economist Simon Johnson points out today, the official White House position is that:

(1) The government created the mega-giants, and they are not the product of free market competition

***

(3) Giant banks are good for the economy

And given that the 12 Federal Reserve banks are private – see this, this, this and this- the giant banks have a huge amount of influence on what the Fed does. Indeed, the money-center banks in New York control the New York Fed, the most powerful Fed bank. Indeed, Jamie Dimon – the head of JP Morgan Chase – is a Director of the New York Fed.

 

Any attempt by the left to say that the free market is all bad and the government is all good is naive and counter-productive.

 

And any attempt by the right to say that we should leave the giant banks alone because that’s the free market are wrong.

 

The [corrupt, captured government "regulators"] and the giant banks are part of a single malignant, symbiotic relationship.

Indeed, while most Americans are in favor of free market capitalism, we don’t have capitalism at the moment. Instead, we have socialism, fascism or crony capitalism, where the government allows a handful of companies to succeed by propping them up, covering up their fraud and handing them guaranteed profts … but allows everyone else to struggle.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 10/12/2011 - 23:15 | 1768288 covert
covert's picture

excellent observation George.

http://expose2.wordpress.com

 

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 20:41 | 1767934 twotraps
twotraps's picture

Political decisions involving economic do not have consequences.   Until they do, this will continue.  We are all shocked by these stories...........yet very few are actually illegal and many are supported by the govt.    

 

Conservative or Liberal....the argument is a distraction.  The real problem is that their decisons go unchecked.  

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 20:31 | 1767905 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

WELL...thank God they weren't confused by that OTHER George Miller. George the V!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGExX4N5bAw&feature=player_detailpage
was his last name Miller?

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 20:05 | 1767837 weinerdog43
weinerdog43's picture

Oh no!  $20 million dollars.  Good thing no Republics ever feed at the trough.  Cough. Halliburton. Cough. 

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 20:15 | 1767862 nmewn
nmewn's picture

A 1.2 billion loan to a company in debt up to its eyeballs...panels to be manufactured in Mexico...Congressman Miller and family the chief beneficiaries.

What fucking planet do you live on?

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 20:21 | 1767877 George Washington
George Washington's picture

Hey, its not like the Obama administration gave a bunch of weapons to the biggest Mexican mafioso drug cartel ... oh, wait ...

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 21:09 | 1768009 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

And GW, in anticipation of your "editorial" integrity, we are eager to see the future blog posts on same.

And Holder-san doing the Iran-assassination-thingie.  Holder-in' the info since June 2011?

Eager, we are.  Doubtful of your penetration we've seen.  Hopeful of improvements we all wish.

- Ned

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 20:30 | 1767902 nmewn
nmewn's picture

;-)

Dammit George...I want to be with you on this...but ALL the dirty laundry is gonna have to be aired out.

The government is there (or should be there) to prevent theft & extortion...not join in it.

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 20:26 | 1767889 Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection's picture

Hey George you aren't supposed to talk about Fast and Furious!

Focus instead on the new bullshit story about Iran and the Drug Cartel working together to whack out diplomats, now that's a good story.  Not as good as a doped up mongoloid getting snuck onto an airplane with panties full of firecrackers, or 19 moozlems making norad stand down, knocking down 3 towers with 2 planes, flying another into a 5 story building at 500mph.

Can't wait for the news they will fabricate for us tomorrow!

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 20:28 | 1767897 George Washington
George Washington's picture

    Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious!      Fast and Furious! 

Thu, 10/13/2011 - 07:01 | 1768771 nmewn
nmewn's picture

Google up Jamie Zapata.

A very deep rabbit hole.

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 20:39 | 1767923 Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection's picture

coming this Christmas... "Too Fast, Too Furious" the amped up sequel!

Al Qaeda, Iran, The Cartel... all joining forces with American gun store owners to hit high value Israeli targets in the US.

The terrorists, armed to the teeth, steal a fleet of ice cream trucks, marauding through suburbia, killing children, puppies and kitties.

It's up to one administration to make the madness stop... will they repeal the 2nd ammendment in time and save us all???

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 22:28 | 1768164 IQ 101
IQ 101's picture

We have kittens, is their an address I can send an application to?

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 19:38 | 1767771 Ahmeexnal
Ahmeexnal's picture

It's Miller time!

Wed, 10/12/2011 - 22:13 | 1768129 IQ 101
IQ 101's picture

Funny you should say that. MMMMiller, not a great beer ,just a good beer.

Now perhaps you can help a simple guy with this little observation.

The Fed Ressrve  is not Federal but is privatly owned by 'The Big Banks' ?

Therefore the Fed Reserve IS 'The Big Banks'?

Am I on the right track?

The 'Big Banks' are the Federal Reserve?

But,But, But that would be insanity wouldn't it?

I must have it all wrong, please guide me if i'm wrong (Again).

Thu, 10/13/2011 - 11:21 | 1769626 Lednbrass
Lednbrass's picture

That about sums it up. Worst part is, you wouldnt believe how many people have told me Im a conspiracy theorist for stating this simple reality.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!