This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Contrary to Widespread Claims, There Is NO EVIDENCE that Iran Is Building a Nuclear Weapon
Update:
Even Israel Admits that Iran Has Not Decided to Build a Nuclear Bomb
Earlier this month, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said:
Are they [the Iranians] trying to develop a nuclear weapon? No. But we know that they’re trying to develop a nuclear capability. And that’s what concerns us.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper confirmed in a Senate hearing – following the release of the classified National Intelligence Estimate in 2011 – that he has a “high level of confidence” that Iran “has not made a decision as of this point to restart its nuclear weapons program.”
Mohamed ElBaradei – who spent more than a decade as the director of the IAEA – said that he had not “seen a shred of evidence” that Iran was pursuing the bomb.
Six former ambassadors to Iran within the last decade say that there is no evidence that Iran is building nuclear weapons, and that Iran is complying with international law.
The International Atomic Energy Agency states:
All nuclear material in the facility remains under the Agency’s containment and surveillance.
In other words, all nuclear fuel is accounted for and is being controlled and monitored by the international agency tasked with nuclear non-proliferation.
What about Iran’s enriching uranium to 20%? The IAEA considers 20 percent enriched uranium to be low-enriched uranium and “a fully adequate isotopic barrier” to weaponization. In other words, 20% is well within the legal guidelines for developing a program of nuclear energy.
Indeed, under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran is acting in a wholly legal fashion. As the six former ambassadors cited above note:
In terms of international law, the position of Europe and the United States may be less assured than is generally believed.
***
Most experts, even in Israel, view Iran as striving to become a “threshold country”, technically able to produce a nuclear weapon but abstaining from doing so for now. Again, nothing in international law forbids this ambition. Several other countries are close to, or have already reached, such a threshold, with a commitment not to acquire nuclear weapons. Nobody seems to bother them.
Nuclear physicist Yousaf Butt – former fellow in the Committee on International Security and Arms Control at the National Academy of Sciences, scientific consultant for the Federation of American Scientists, and frequent contributor to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists – points out:
Iran is not doing anything that violates its legal right to develop nuclear technology. Under the NPT, it is not illegal for a member state to have a nuclear weapons capability — or a “nuclear option.” If a nation has a fully developed civilian nuclear sector — which the NPT actually encourages — it, by default, already has a fairly solid nuclear weapons capability. For example, like Iran, Argentina, Brazil, and Japan also maintain a “nuclear option” — they, too, could break out of the NPT and make a nuclear device in a few months, if not less. And like Iran, Argentina and Brazil also do not permit full “Additional Protocol” IAEA inspections.
The real legal red line, specified in the IAEA’s “Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements,” is the diversion of nuclear materials to a weapons program. However, multiple experts and official reports have affirmed over the years that they have no evidence that any such program exists.
But didn’t the latest IAEA report say that Iran was trying to build a bomb?
Not really. The latest IAEA report states that Iran’s research program into nuclear weapons:
Was stopped rather abruptly pursuant to a ‘halt order’ instruction issued in late 2003.
While there are some allegations about documents found on a laptop, those documents apparently came from a terrorist group with zero credibility.
In any event, the current accusations against Iran by hawks pushing for an attack cannot be taken in a vacuum:
- The people pushing for war against Iran are the same neocons who pushed for war against Iraq based on false statements that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. See this, this and this
- The U.S. has been claiming for more than 30 years that Iran was on the verge of nuclear capability (and the U.S. apparently helped fund the Iranian nuclear program)
- War against Iran was planned at least 20 years ago
- Other recent claims against Iran have largely been debunked
- The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950?s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister
- Pulitzer-prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh says that the Bush administration (and especially Dick Cheney) helped to fund terrorist groups within Iran (see confirming articles here and here)
- The New York Times, Washington Post and others are reporting, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, former national security adviser Fran Townsend and former Attorney General Michael Mukasey – who all said that the terrorists were going to get us if we didn’t jettison the liberties granted under the Bill of Rights – are now supporting terrorists in Iran
BUT DIDN’T IRAN THREATEN TO WIPE ISRAEL OFF THE MAP?
It has been widely report that Iran’s president threatened to “wipe Israel off the map”. However, numerous experts in Iranian language and culture say that this was a mistranslation.
I speak no Farsi, know nothing about Iranian culture or idioms, and don’t like Iran’s president or hardline Mullahs. So I can’t weigh in one way or the other.
However, Iran has not attacked another country in hundreds of years. (In the Iran-Iraq war, Iraq was the initial aggressor.) As such, it is unlikely to start one now.
THERE’S A SIMPLE SOLUTION TO THE ESCALATING TENSIONS
There is a simple solution to the escalating rumors of war. Specifically, a fuel swap would end the tensions. As Butt writes:
[A commentator] proposes a fuel swap to resolve the nuclear standoff: Iran would curtail its enrichment in exchange for foreign-supplied 20 percent enriched uranium fuel plates for its research reactor. In fact, in 2010, just such a deal was brokered by Turkey and Brazil but the United States could not take “yes” for an answer. Though Iran has just accepted an offer of new talks brokered by Turkey, new sanctions passed by Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama have made it even more unlikely that the two sides can reach an agreement.
EVEN IF IRAN WERE TRYING TO BUILD A BOMB, AN ATTACK WOULD ONLY ACCELERATE THE PROCESS
Even if Iran were trying to build a bomb, American military and intelligence chiefs say that attacking Iran would only speed up its development of nuclear weapons, empower its hardliners, and undermine the chance for democratic reform.
»
- advertisements -
What amrican alliance would make for a proper jordan? This land is your land, this land is my land,...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_intervention_in_the_Middle_East
Ps. Proportion of all Arab Oil controlled by the British [UK] and the American's [USA] in 1939 - 66% UK/ 13% USA ___WoW!!!
Ps2. In 1956 the "U.S. 6th Fleet",... now in total control of the Middle East with the UK a has-been [actually, Britain had lost its world hegemony in the early 20th century] and the proportion of Middle East [Arab Oil, etc,.. peripheries] dominance is now "66% USA/ 30% UK___ **[Russia was always looming in the shadows under Colonel Nasser ?,... and presence is still felt there today, but the arab's are onto the, "Divide and Conquer" bullshit from the west]
Ps3. America has won over the Middle East with the Baghdad Pact - or has it?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2801487.stm
Your footnotes go nowhere. Please use working links to back up your arguments ...
Otherwise, I will treat it as Ipse Dixit.
WE'VE ATTACKED THEM ALREADY MORON. I did take note that T.S. Geithner is out "should the President win." Apparently the attack "wasn't authorized" or something or other. Ooops! Anywho..."let's get back to the message at hand." how the internet is being used to do this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAMCHShxS9A&feature=player_detailpage
for a refresher look up Mitt Romney's dad and his famous "brain washing" comment. it caused a sensation when he said it. "and that was the end" as they say. Well...almost the end as it turned out.
Sorry for the lack of links GW, the footnoted materials and a few of the others came from Iran Watch: http://www.iranwatch.org/ an organization set up at the University of Wisconsin. This is the best page to go to for quick links to many good sources. http://www.iranwatch.org/wmd/
I am really very troubled that so much real evidence is being discounted as not proof of anything, a lot of it is not by itself PROOF of any particular pursuit of nuclear weapons, but taken together as part of a tableau of evasion, secrecy, and total lack of cooperation with international agencies it submitted itself to when it signed the NNPT Iran is clearly if not actually building a bomb today they are setting themselves up to be able to on very short notice, couple that with a state policy of genocide toward Israel and the destabilizing forces of Hamas and Hezbollah in the region which are Iranian levers of terror and I say Iran is easily the most dangerous nation on the globe.
I see so much absolute outright denial of Iranian attempts to build a bomb it borders on the same messianic quasi-religious fervor that put Barry O in office. Or that feeds the wrong headed arguments about anthropogenic global warming, one that will make sure we FAIL in total to identify the real problem and thus totally fail to find a solution. I repeat, Iran is going to get a bomb if it is not stopped and that cannot be allowed to happen or the whole planet will pay the price.
Just because BushCo and the hated Neocons deliberately led us into two wars on lies and spurious propaganda does not mean one can fail to examine the Iranian situation separately and without bias.
IranWatch.org appears to be down. However, it seems like it is a K Street front:
Good for you, George.
It was working fo me a few minutes ago. K Street you say, of course, any organization that the Pro Iran faction likes is a neocon or K Street or GS front. Now that K Street owns the University of Wisconsin one has to pose the question what is NOT a K Street front, and why should I care anyway? Iran is evil, you can deal with it now or you can deal with it at much higher cost later, up to you all.
Boiltherich, I personally do not want in my name to be responsible for the bloody slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent villagers on the word of someone like retired General Colin Powell. As to “you can deal with it now” simply means once again the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent villagers.
See the letter and the press release that accompanied the launch of Iran Watch.
Iran Watch is published by the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control. The Wisconsin Project carries out research and public education designed to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, chemical/biological weapons and long-range missiles. It is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization in Washington, D.C. founded in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. You can access the Project's web site at www.wisconsinproject.org or from the bottom of any page on Iran Watch.
The editor and principal researcher for Iran Watch is Valerie Lincy, who is the Project's Executive Director . Ms. Lincy graduated from Smith College and received an M.S. in foreign service from Georgetown University. Before coming to the Project, she worked as a researcher in the Paris bureau of the New York Times and as a researcher in Washington-based non-profit institutes.
Iran Watch is overseen by Gary Milhollin, who is the Project's President. Professor Milhollin was a member of the faculty at the University of Wisconsin Law School for more than twenty years. He holds degrees in engineering and law, and was an Administrative Judge, part-time, at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for more than a decade.
Not a single one of your links work ...
www.wisconsinproject.org is down, too.
The NRC (like the IAEA) is a political agency, which makes decisions based upon policy, not science.
That's not to say all admin judges who worked there are bad people ...
Those sites are allergic to GW!
Please stop confusing GW!
Iran has been waging a low level war against the US via proxy for decades.
The idea that they have are non aggressive all the while doing do so is hilarious.
Using typical deluded ZH logic, the US has not expanded it's geographic borders in a very long time,
guess that means the US has not been aggressive,
afterall imperialism is explictly defined as expanding one's physical borders.
so the US is not imperialistic at all using the deluded ZH logic of course.
Iran is a peaceful democratic society that has been quite self sufficient ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abadan_Iran
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Treaty_Organization
lastly: "The Reveal"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Pakistan-India_gas_pipeline
via China?
thanks GW
ps. the only aggression the iranians ever had [almost caused a war] with afghanistan, was, a long while back - when several of their diplomatic envoys were killed
Yes extremely peaceful. Provided one is not a woman or gay.
Yes no aggression whatsoever, provided one excludes the perpetual Iranian war against the US going on for decades.
Yes democracy, provided one excludes the guy in charge wins.
Yes, thank you. I'm glad you pointed out how the USA is such a great place for democracy, justice, and law and order. A few decades ago the USA outlawed mixed marriages and one time 10k Texans watched as an innocent black man was lynched for I don't know what, maybe looking at a white woman. I looooove democracy!
Oh, and I forgot, the US law that mandates we war with any land that doesn't have the USA's form of democracy, you know, like the NDAA where the Pres paints a T for terrorist on any American's back and sends him sans charges to die in a foreign prison. NOW THAT'S DEMOCRACY!!!!!!!!!!!
Plato placed democracy one short step away from fascism.
You like law and order? Try this: per the Constitution, all signed USA Treaties are full and equal force of the Constitution. This includes the NNPA Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act, which demands all nuclear armed countries must participate and signees to the Treaty are forbidden to do business with non-participants such as Israel, Pakistan, and India (Israel does not even acknowledge the are nuclear armed).
So the USA commits Federal felony every time we trade with, participate with Israel, India, and Pakistan.
So by the warmonger's logic (not mine) the beings from some planet more powerful than earth should soon visit earth and smite the USA for being outlaws and criminals, to better teach the world "democracy".
You are very welcome!
It doesn't take that many words to rationalize away the current treatment of women and gays or for that matter the difference in the US democracy vs Iran's and Iran's persistent war against the US but good work otherwise.
Excellent job. Anytime you want to see your theories in practice,
I'll foot the bill.
Walk down Main St Teheran with a sign blasting Muhammed and video tape it,
and I will foot your funeral expenses.
We can try the same type of thing in Jerusalem or NYC with obviously offensive signs and see how that works out, we can see how many extreme zionistas come out vs radical muzzies in Iran.
The fact that in France, Sweden, The UK et al your chances are only slightly higher of surviving than in Iran is immaterial.
Then you can rationalize it all till your fingers fall off, redefine what fanaticism means and revolutionize the concepts of moderate islam.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/01/israel/-ultra-orthodox-protest-...
Iran 1998 via Afghanistan *[note the date]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghanistan-Iran_relations
Excellent research, George, on a topic that could bring such warmongers as Gingrich to positions of power where their threats could be realized.
Today, the news of the outright purchase of candidate Gingrich by Zionist Casino magnate Sheldon Adelson ($13 million so far with more on the way is all over the Internet. And no one tears the curtain away to expose this American tragedy like Justin Raimondo (Antiwar.com).
Adelson and his allies, says Raimondo (quote):
…have been campaigning for war with Iran for years, not only here but in the Middle East. Adelson is a major financial backer of Israel’s ultra-nationalist Likud party, which calls in its platform for a “Greater Israel,” and he has backed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the hilt. The 16th richest man in the world, with his casino empire stretching from Macao to Las Vegas, he thought nothing of giving $60 million to Israel’s anniversary celebration. He is also a major backer of AIPAC, the most important pro-Israel lobbying organization – but downsized his contribution when the group signed on to the two-state solution advanced by both Republican and Democratic presidents – on the grounds that the plan means Israel is “committing suicide.” He supports the extremist – and increasingly violent – “settler” movement, and is the money-bags behind the “Clarion Fund,” which is responsible for flooding the US with anti-Arab propaganda. As a major contributor to the “Birthright” program, which sponsors trips to Israel by students from around the world, he addressed a recent Birthright gathering in Israel, where he declared:
“Read the history of those who call themselves Palestinians, and you will hear why [Newt] Gingrich said recently that the Palestinians are an invented people. There are a number of Palestinians who will recognize the truth of this statement.”
In spite of being a highly-paid and sought after “historian” of note, you’ll be surprised, I’m sure, to learn Gingrich takes his lessons from Adelson, whose academic credentials are far less impressive. Because Newt didn’t always believe the Palestinians are a figment of their own imaginations: this idea coincided with Adelson’s generous donations to Gingrich, Inc.
In a 2005 article for the Middle East Quarterly, Professor Newt opined that the Palestinians are “a relatively wealthy, educated, and cosmopolitan people,” who are “in some ways among the most international and most advanced people in the Arab world.” So advanced that they “invented” themselves? He also called for the US government to “establish a program of economic aid for the Palestinians to match the aid the U.S. government provides Israel.”
While Newt’s 2005 piece disparages the role of diplomacy, and attacks the present Palestinian leadership (including the Palestinian Authority/PLO) as nothing but a bunch of “terrorists,” he writes:
“The U.S. government should become the protector of the Palestinian people’s right to have a decent amount of land. The desire of some Israelis to use security as an excuse to grab more Palestinian land should be blocked by Washington even if that requires employing financial or other leverage to compel the Israeli government to behave reasonably on the issue of settlements. It is vital to our credibility in the entire Middle East that we insist on an end to Israeli expansionism. It is vital to our humanitarian duty to the Palestinian people that we protect the weaker party from the stronger power. It is vital that the world sees that our total support for Israeli security is not matched by a one-sided support for more extreme Israeli territorial demands.”
Upon receiving a record amount of $13 million from Adelson – the latest installment was a check for $5 million from Miriam Adelson, his Israeli-born wife – Newt the Historian woke up one morning to discover that there are no Palestinians – only a horde of drooling Orcs trespassing on Israeli land.
While expressing concern in his 2005 article that the Iranians could develop nuclear weapons, he gave it “another generation of violence and hatred” until it would result in “a devastating attack on Israel.” These days, however, he is taking Adelson’s view, which is that war with Iran is inevitable and necessarily imminent. As Connie Bruck reported in her definitive 2008 New Yorker profile:
“Adelson is also funding, with a $4.5-million grant, a think tank, the Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies, at the right-leaning Shalem Center, in Jerusalem. Netanyahu allies are on its staff. Natan Sharansky, the chairman of One Jerusalem, also chairs the Adelson Institute. Sharansky helped organize a “Democracy and Security” conference last June, in Prague, which was attended by President Bush. Iran was a major topic of discussion. A month after the Prague conference, Adelson attended a fund-raising event at the C.A.A. talent agency, in Los Angeles, for Steven Emerson, an investigative journalist specializing in Islamic extremism and terrorism, who was showing a ten-minute trailer for a film he wanted to make. Emerson introduced Sheldon and Miriam to the overflow crowd in C.A.A.’s two-hundred-seat theatre, saying that they were his generous supporters. After Emerson’s presentation, Pooya Dayanim, a Jewish-Iranian democracy activist based in Los Angeles, chatted with Adelson. Recalling their conversation, Dayanim observed that Adelson was dismissive of Reza Pahlevi, the son of the former Shah, who had participated in the Prague conference, because, Adelson said, ‘he doesn’t want to attack Iran.’ According to Dayanim, Adelson referred to another Iranian dissident at the conference, Amir Abbas Fakhravar, whom he said he would like to support, saying, ‘I like Fakhravar because he says that, if we attack, the Iranian people will be ecstatic.’ Dayanim said that when he disputed that assumption Adelson responded, ‘I really don’t care what happens to Iran. I am for Israel.’”
Gingrich called for the assassination of Iranian scientists even before the bombs started to go off inside Iran, and vies with Rick Santorum to see who can rattle the saber in Tehran’s direction the loudest.
War with Iran is the culmination of the “Clean Break” Strategy presented to Netanyahu in 1996 by a group of American neoconservatives who recommended a new strategy of aggression that would break the Jewish state out of what they perceived to be a cul de sac that would fatally subvert the Zionist project. Instead of playing defense, Israel must go on the offensive, and take out Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, his brother Ba’athists in Syria, and ultimately effect a change of regime in Iran. With Saddam gone, Bashar al-Assad on the way out, and Iran in America’s cross hairs, the “Clean Break” has so far been a resounding success: all that remains is for a US President to give the order to attack Iran. If Adelson has his way, that day will come soon: that is what he thinks he is buying when he pours his millions into the Gingrich campaign.
The idea is to make support for Israel a “wedge issue” to benefit the Republican party, like abortion or gay marriage: by funding Gingrich, Adelson hopes to complete the Likud-ization of the GOP. Such a party will junk the two-state solution upheld by every Republican president, go along with the “Clean Break” strategy – and willingly destroy the American economy by starting a war that would instantly drive the price of energy through the roof.
The “wedge” strategy is looked on with distrust and real fear by the mainstream Jewish leadership in this country, which has always valued the bipartisan pro-Israel consensus as the basis of the “special relationship.” The Likudnik Clean Breakers, however, are taking a radical new tack, one that could easily set off a political backlash, and lead to an increase in anti-Israel – and anti-Semitic – sentiment in the Democratic base. In Israel, too, there is resentment of Adelson, the American, telling Israelis what’s best for them and meddling in their politics. He says “I am for Israel,” but Israelis know he isn’t of Israel, and can afford to play war games from a safe distance.
That someone pursuing the agenda of a foreign country can hide behind some benign-sounding PAC and pour unlimited amounts of anonymous cash into our elections represents a real threat to our national security – and ought to make one think twice about our current campaign finance laws. Furthermore, it is a national disgrace that Miriam Adelson – who has not renounced her Israeli citizenship – can write a $5 million check and hand it to a candidate who is beating the war drums day and night on Israel’s behalf. Political contributions from foreign sources are illegal, and that’s the way it ought to be: but what about dual citizens? Should they be allowed to influence the American political process in favor of their other allegiance – and, while we’re on the subject, why do we allow dual citizenship, anyway?
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2012/01/24/adelson-gingrich-and-the-selling-of-america/
I have only sympathy for "everyday", normal people with the misfortune to have been born "Judaic", and who now suffer under the persecution of the Rabbis and Orthodox Judaism. The Rabbis say Hitler did God's work because the Jews Hitler killed turned away from and stopped obeying the Rabbis.
Examples of Western religious hypocrisy that support the conclusion of Orthodox Judaism's stranglehold on Western culture: Allegedly news-hip Westerners are often obsessed with perceived defects with the Muslim faith, such as Sharia Law, "Muslim extremiss", etc.
Yet the simple fact that Orthodox Judaism teaches their DNA makes them superior to every other "race", that all other races are mongrel non-humans, is unknown and as soon as anyone in MSM brings it up, their entire personal and professional life is over because they are immediatley and forever labeled anti-Semite. Further, Orthodox Judaism is not "extremist" even though female Orthodox Jews in ultra-liberal NYC can not drive cars...also, the Rabbis inspect female's underwear, measure red spotting diameters, and declare they will die in childbirth if they conceive on the wrong day. The fact that there is such extreme hatred and bigotry in Orthodox Judaism is always off-limits in normal speech. Conversely, in Western culture any other type of thought process, no matter how defective otherwise, is encouraged toward the discovery of enlightenment.
Oh, if we could only have a reasoned, non-threatening discussion of the effects and results of our relationship with Israel and Judaism and Zionism, without the smoke of "holocaustianity" and the 3rd Reich hanging over us.
If you revisit your post, which is spot on by the way, you might want to peruse... UNION JACK
Shazamm! Yet another Zionista in the woodwork! They are persistent, I'll give 'em that. Like termites....
Well, now we know (if there were any doubts) The Newster is a useful tool of the Zionist-Bankster Complex. He and Barry can do a reach-around now.
god bless you george and keep speaking the truth!!!!
the same fucking neocon plutocrat assholes who lied to us about wmd in iraq are playing the same tired bullshit lies about iran....
smedley butler spoke precisely about these plutocratic intrigues to foment war as a way of lining the plutocrats' god forsaken blood drenched pockets...
fuck the neocons, fuck the plutocrats, and fuck the god damned war mongerers!!!!
the state run media (cbs, nbc, abc, cnn, fox etc) will pump the sheople full war baiting lies - fuck them all to hell too....
Zionism seems to be similar to a drug user who dies of overdose: Extremist Zionists don't realize or don't care that their world-view (all goyim should die, their DNA makes them God's only "chosenites") is suicidal in the extreme. Zionists don't care that they lead their only true friend in the world (the USA) down the primrose path to death. They'll use us up, toss us in the dung heap of history, then look around and realize too late or never their world view leads them and the rest of the world to certain annihilation.
WOW sounds just like moderate islam. One of the larger oxymorons in the current world.
Joe Jones HAHAHAHHAHAHA
Was Ali Akbar taken?
I almost forgot! Fukk all the Eurotrash arab ball danglers who idly stand by as the socialists decimate their militaries and their continent is once again overrun.
AS Mohamed was the number one name for babies this past year in the United Kingdom of Radical Muzzies some refer to as Great Britain.
The problem with your incorrect analogy is that there are several dozen NYT best sellers on every real and potential negative aspect of Islam.
Most readers here never knew that NYC Judaic females are forbidden to drive cars till I typed it. Nor that Rabbis measure the diameter of red blood spots on Judaic female's panties....and if they conceive on the wrong day the Rabbi tells them they will die in childbirth. Do you deny these claims? Is this normal or extremist in your Islam-hating universe?
Conversely, Paypal and Amazon dissallow trade of books written by scientists that contain evidence that the highest icon of Western culture (Judaic Holocaustianity) did not happen as Judaics claim it happened (holocaust in the technical sense, meaning the Germans purposely killed 6 million Judaics by sending the Judaics into shower stalls and piping poison gas into the showers).
Debra Lipstadt Harvard Phd. commands us to send directly to prison any "holocaust denier", but its fine for her to deny the allies committed holocaust of 40,000 German civilians in Dresden.
Commonly, when the authors of The Israel Lobby appear, they are threatened, heckled, called anti-Semites, etc. When you are Juan Williams and you make the bigotted remark that you are scared when someone with a turban gets on the airplane, you sell many more millions of books and are a hero in the Western neo-con universe.
How many here knew that Jews were amongst the most notorious slave owners in the USA?
I don't want any pain or suffering for anyone, least of all Judaics.
I just want an honest conversation. Is it good to believe your heredity, your DNA makes you holier than everyone else? Is there anything more biggoted and small minded than such belief?
As I already told your Brother Muhammed aka Alien,
I am not jewish, it actually took me several days to figure out why he was calling me Schlomo.
Nothing superior here, I am actually a complete and total imbecile,
the funny thing is I get it and the rocket surgeons and brain scientists such as yourself and the other arab ball danglers don't.
I do thoroughly enjoy the gross exception vs the obvious norm stuff though.
Have any more lynchings, stonings or gay killings, freedom of speech stuff from the fringe of the evil zionistas? As oif they compare to the radical islamic muzzie norm.
get out of your stepdad's basement much, captain america?
no, cause if he does, the Muslims will attack him
See DemocracyNow from late last year. Interview of that famous guy who writes for the The New Yorker whose name escapes me right at the moment. He confirms all of this and MORE on his NYer blog some time around Christmas as I recall. The interview is archived at DemocracyNow if you missed it. I agree that Fukishima is much worse than 'advertised', NO DOUBT! Not to mention the continuing crisis of Chernobyl
Seymour Hersh: Propaganda Used Ahead of Iraq War Is Now Being Reused over Iran’s Nuke Program
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/11/21/seymour_hersh_propaganda_used_ahe...
Excellent interview.
If Iran wanted a nuclear weapon I'm sure they could buy one from a number of nations with this capability.
I'm sure it's all about oil and by viewing the current posturing of the U.S. military it's also clear the neo-cons are still in charge. Any elected government is just a puppet. Pull back the curtain and you'll see Cheney with his shit-eating grin.
Sures ... riiiights ...
I need some emoticons!
Or the Banksters Cartel..
Nothing new (for centuries..)
Be safe all.
they could trade india some oil for one!
or....
china..
either way!
http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6009.htm#.Tx9_1HCjgLc.gmail
This was never about nukes. This is about Bablyon.
My apology if this does not aply. If you refer to "Babylon" in Revelation, Babylon is The Apostle John's euphemism for Jerusalem in the 1st CAD, prior to 70AD when Rome destroyed the Hebrew temple, marking the end of the Mosaic/Leviticul law. (Again, no such word "Jew" appeared in writing till 1775 AD per Oxford, check it yourself.)
The best known, and thoroughly convincing proof supporting the above claim is in "The Parousia" written circa 1875 AD by James Stuart Russell, who received his MD at age 18.
After reading the above book and "Behind The Veil of Moses" by Brian Martin, you will LOL at every reference to a future physical coming of Christ (Christ already came and fulfilled every Scripture prophecy in 70AD).
Further the term "666" refers to Nero Ceasar: Assign numbers to the Aramaic alphabet. The sum total of the numbers assigned to Aramaic letters equivalent to N-E-R-O = "666". John and the believers used code speaking/writing of Nero because they denied Nero's deity, which carried the death penalty.
There is absolutely no Holy Bible reference to an "end of time", though there is a "time of the end" of the Mosaic Law, which was "fulfilled" by Jesus Christ. In fact, the OT promises the physical earth goes on forever and will never end.
These days "666" can only refer to Fox News, Abe Foxman and the like.
FOX = 666
F = 6
O = 15 = 1+5 = 6
X = 24 = 2+4 = 6
FOX = 666
Isn't it an incredible coincidence that this one word in the English language lines up so well with what some consider crazed and/or evil in their own right?
Using the above logic, why aren't actual foxes agents of the devil?
LOL, code for Nero. Don't leave em hanging, explain the image and the tax defining the ''want'' of Babylon, as it now stands lol, ...all nations and Israel(+Jerusalem). No end time etc..., Lol. Joey Joey Joey. When you see the comming of the Son of Man ...hows about looking up? Lol
http://bible.cc/matthew/24-14.htm
http://www.prophecyinthenews.com/videos/tv-program/
http://bible.cc/1_thessalonians/5-3.htm
It's common for people to think the world revolves around them, as may be the case with you.
The NT authors wrote to persons living in what we now call the ME in the 1st CAD.
I respectfuly suggest you examine and take special note when reading the word "you" in the NT. Remarkably (to you, possibly) such pronouns do not apply to persons not yet born, or 2000 years hence, but rather apply to persons living in the 1st CAD to whom the words were addressed.
When reading a notice dated 6 January 2010, in which occurs an invitation to a party at the park "next Saturday", you realize (I hope) that the party is long gone and you won't appear at the park for the event.
Translation: if a vs. addresses someone in the 1st CAD ("you") and the vs. states the event will happen to the original recipients of the vs., then the event is already past or the author lied. There is no other alternative.
Lol, JJ, in ''your'' image. Good one. Summer is really Fall, Lol. No leaf on ''your'' tree. Lol. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYeVQzTVyLk&feature=related
George.. we need an excuse to steal Iran's Oil.. so cut the idiots in Washington some slack would ya..
they are doing the best they can.. lucky sperm club participants are never going to develop the best work product in anything.. but they will be making the decisions with regard to America's Future..
so have a heart, the spoiled brats that get the most powerful Country in the World handed to them on a silver platter are doing the best they can.
Iran Must, Ira Will! Give us the Lite Sweet Crude Production of their's for the next 200 years..
Energy Security is a hard sell, look at Iraq.. all the money given to Wall Street and Oil Prices are still high! It is not like Wall Street or more accurately 5th Ave. has an easy Job selling the America (Sheepeople) Public on the idea that attacking Iran for Cheap Gas Prices is going to have a lot of traction.
All I am saying is, put yourself in their shoes before you go pointing out the fact(s) Willy Nilly, ok?
Thanks! You are a Sport!
signed, Christian Constitutionalist
...eh, there's all that but, don't forget (the/god(s) of Loyd & Ayatollah) the meaning of counterintelligence (claim of dominion) does not define persons whom accept the sustaining mercy of our Father In Christ, it defines the the war, against The Sustaing Mercy, ...by all nations and Israel. Lol http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/iran-preparing-now-for-armageddon/
How many times have I (and others) told you it's not about nukes, it's about controlling Iran's oil, putting it back in US dollars to be specific
...and cutting off oil to China ...and setting up a US-friendly central bank ...and stealing Iran's gold
...just like Iraq and Lybia.
Dumbasses like you GW never learn. What an ignorant dumbass moron.
It is not about oil! It is about irrational Israeli hatred and paranoia toward their neighbors - sentiments shared by their U.S. kinsmen - feelings that are directed toward us U.S. citizens who do not support their blood lust.
We can buy mideast oil for a lot less than the trillion dollars we spend on each new war.
We have to begin calling this lust for mideast war by its real name!
Excellent point,
The Gulf was ruined forever and Fukashima was the end of the world as we know it.
GW been right on the mark.
with this statement, GW will piss off the Israeli etat majeur big time...trouble maker for pax americana...well that's a good way of being contrarian.
The evidence that Iran is planning to build nuclear weapons is obvious: they are spending huge amounts of money on centrifuges and a nuclear program which makes no economic sense unless they are intended as part of a nuclear bomb program.
Yesterday George Washington was arguing that Fukushima has caused tens of thousands of cancer deaths. And today he argues that Iran's nuclear energy program is sensible and rational!
Nuclear energy is dangerous and expensive. Consider this recent headline:
The prospects of Exelon constructing a third reactor at Constellation Energy's Calvert Cliffs plant in Maryland after the two companies complete their merger are dim, said John Rowe, chairman and CEO of Exelon. "At today's [natural] gas prices, a new nuclear power plant is out of the money by a factor of two," Rowe said.
Iran has already been offered all the low-enriched uranium it needs a bargain prices in exchange for canceling its centrifuge program. If it just wants low enriched uranium, that would be by far the cheapest way to go. But it has repeatedly refused.
Possession of a crude nuclear bomb would give Iran a credible threat to close Hormuz, because a single nuke can take out a US carrier group.
I think Panetta is relying on a weasely distinction between what Iran is doing at this moment versus what they are planning in the near future. The Obama administration has made a decision to allow Iran to develop nukes. But it would not sound good for Panetta to say: "Yes, we believe Iran is planning to build a nuke in the near future, but we have decided not to do anything about it." So he emphasizes that they aren't doing anything now, at this very moment. Obviously they won't start constructing the bomb until they have enough enriched uranium. But once they have the uranium, it would only take them a month or two to build a bomb.