This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Economy Is In Jeopardy
This article is one of a series of occasional white papers from the Daily Capitalist taking a detailed look at specific issues affecting the economy. In this paper I analyze current economic events and give my forecast for the economy. It goes into detail about how I think the economy should be evaluated.
Part I
The Crossroad
The economy is at one of those crossroads where something is going to happen. Whether that will be a positive or a negative is often difficult to tell because at any time one of those "Black Swans" could land in our midst and change everything. Plans are fluid and and forecasting can be quixotic. That said I believe that we are at a critical point and the U.S. economy is heading for a fall.
In order to understand what "tomorrow" might be we need to look at today and try to tie those threads together. Here is my analysis step by step and you can decide if you agree with my conclusions.
Today
There have been a lot of data reports that I have been looking at in terms of an overall view of the economy. I apologize for all of the charts and data, but they offer some insight into trends.
Price Indices1
Both the Producer Price Index and the Consumer Price Index have shown modest price increases, but may be trending negative.
The Producer Price Index:
On a twelve-month basis, finished goods have gone up 5.9%, intermediate goods up 8.3%, and crude goods up 12.6%. However the recent trend is down, as the above chart shows.
The Consumer Price Index:
Consumer prices declined 0.1%, and core (less energy and food) went up 0.1%. On a year-over-year basis, prices have increased 3.5%, but that is down from 3.9% the prior month, mainly due to energy costs.
Industrial Production
Industrial production as measured by shipments showed a 0.7% gain in October, and the 12-month index was up 3.9%.
Manufacturing
The important factory sector output was up 0.5% in October and up 4.1% for the 12-months. The only negative here, and it is a significant one, is that new orders are flat, but may not be declining:
The more telling ISM's manufacturing index shows some weakness:
The capital goods sector has been showing strong growth:
Business sales
Business sales and inventories are also steady:
Businesses are carefully managing their inventories, keeping them lean as sales move incrementally forward. Business inventories are unchanged in the September report with sales up 0.6 percent [11.06% YoY], a combination that keeps the inventory-to-sales ratio at 1.27. This ratio has been pretty steady for the last two years after spiking as high as 1.49 during the recession when sales of course plunged.
But note that these numbers are nominal, not adjusted for inflation.
Retail sales
Retail sales and food services were up 0.5% for October, and 7.2% YoY. Again, these numbers are not adjusted for inflation. They are steady but have been flat (±) since August, 2010.
Wages and Earnings
Real wages continue to be weak. While real wages increased 0.3% in October, that was after a CPI adjustment ((earnings +0.2)+(CPI -0.1%)). On a YoY basis, real earnings are down 1.6%. "An unchanged average workweek combined with the decline in real average hourly earnings resulted in a 1.7 percent decrease in real average weekly earnings during the same period."
Bank Credit
Bank credit conditions are still sluggish.
Consumer credit:
Consumer credit increased at an annual rate of 1.5% in the third quarter. Revolving credit decreased at an annual rate of 3.25%, while nonrevolving credit increased 3.75%. In September consumer credit increased at an annual rate of 3.5%. Revolving credit is credit card debt; nonrevolving debt is mostly auto loans and student loans. Generally, consumer credit has been rather flat except for auto loans which have been up and down, but mostly up:
Business credit:
What has changed is that commercial and industrial loans have grown, especially at small domestic banks. Look at the Fed's H.8 commercial bank commercial and industrial (C&I) loans in 2011 (note: I modified this chart to fit):
(Note that "Other consumer loans" are mostly auto loans. This consumer credit data is slightly different than the Fed's G.19 data on consumer credit, above.)
What we see is that C&I loans took off starting in Q1 2011. While the data for large domestic banks shows steady C&I loan growth since Q4 2009, small domestic bank C&I lending shot up in Q1 2011, from zero base to $20 billion:
Even more surprising is that average loan size for small banks increased from about $100,000 to almost $650,000. One might conclude from this that the credit freeze is over and small banks are lending and small to medium business enterprises (SMEs) are borrowing, thus indicating a recovery.
What is happening?
The main reason for this sudden increase in loan activity is competition. Ever since Dodd-Frank, banks have been scrambling to figure out how to make more money as many credit card and other account fees were prohibited in an attempt to protect consumers. One way to offset that loss is to gain more business customers, and there has been a scramble by both large and small banks for SME customers. Small banks have the most to gain or lose in this competition because SMEs are their territory. So they are pursuing customers. Many also believe that there is a window of opportunity with favorable spreads and thus the timing is critical to expand business before that window closes. The initial beneficiaries seem to be the banks in the $5 to $10 billion asset range, which are classified as small banks. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, an investment bank specializing in services to the banking sector said:
[Damon DelMonte, an analyst with KBW Inc.'s Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Inc.] said banks reporting loan growth are taking a bigger slice of the pie, but the pie isn't getting much bigger. "We're not of the belief that the demand for new loans is really ramping up," he said. "It seems like it's more of a shifting of market share. Smaller banks are going to benefit at the expense of larger banks."
This was also confirmed by the Fed's October 2011 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices where they reported increased competition, but that loan demand was weak:
I will explain the significance of this data further on in this paper.
International trade
On the international scene, imports were actually down slightly which was seen as a positive by most analysts (I see it as a negative):
The U.S. trade deficit unexpectedly improved in September but a significant part of it appears to have been related to flight to safety to gold during September's weak financial markets. The September trade gap shrank to $43.1 billion from $44.9 billion in August. The latest shortfall was narrower than analysts' expectations for a $46.3 billion deficit. Exports gained 1.4 percent after edging up 0.1 percent in August. Imports rose 0.3 percent in September, following a 0.2 percent decline the prior month.
Exports have been a substantial driver of the economy ($2.117 trillion):
International capital flows
The TIC Report (Treasury International Capital) shows us that money continues to flow into the U.S. seeking refuge mainly in Treasurys:
Volatility in international financial markets made for a second straight month of increasing inflow into long-term US securities, at $68.6 billion in September following August's revised $58.0 billion. These follow inflows of only $9.1 billion and $4.1 billion in the two prior months. US investors, repatriating their funds, were small net sellers of foreign securities in September. But increasing demand for US securities is narrowly based into Treasuries in contrast to outflows for corporate bonds and especially US equities which is no surprise given the general move into safety and away from risk. Net outflows from equities were a very steep $19.2 billion in September following August's $6.5 billion outflow.
Summary
Here is a summary the above data:
-
Industrial production (manufacturing and services) is continuing a flat to declining trend that has been going on since Q2 2010. Manufacturing has shown recent growth but it mirrors the negative to flat trend. Capital goods orders have improved, reflecting technological upgrades (which is also mirrored in software sales).
-
Prices are starting to decline both at the producer and consumer level. Oil prices are likely to decline as worldwide economic activity slows. But, as we know, political shocks from producers can alter this forecast dramatically.
-
Retail sales, adjusted for price inflation continue to be flat to declining.
-
Credit conditions are still tight at the consumer level, and business credit still suffers from lack of demand.
-
Exports have been a primary driver of the economy and have rebounded substantially post-Crash as a result of a devalued dollar.
-
European economic problems have caused a significant influx of money into the U.S. and that has been parked in Treasurys.
Here is a summary of other data I feel is important and which I have recently discussed:
-
Unemployment is high. At 9% there are 13.9 million unemployed, while the broader measure of unemployed (U-6) is 25 million. While unemployment has been dropping at a snail's pace, jobs are not being created at a sufficient rate to substantially reduce unemployment. New jobless claims have been hovering around the 400,000 per week for the entire year.
-
Real disposable income is falling.
-
Personal savings have fallen from a post-Crash high of 5.8% in June, 2010, to 3.6% as of Sept., 2011 because consumers are using savings to fund consumption.
-
GDP is static rather than growing and the latest Q3 boost will likely not continue. It is likely that the Q3 report will be revised downward.
-
Auto sales are related to pent-up demand and are not likely to be sustained.
-
The top 5% of earners account for 37% of all consumer spending and it they who are supporting consumer spending. I call this a "bifurcated economy." There is no broad based consumer spending rally.
-
Household debt ($13.9 trillion) is still historically very high and has not been substantially reduced.
-
U.S. sovereign debt is 100% of GDP ($15 trillion and growing).
-
All government spending (federal, state, and local) comprises 45.6% of GDP.
-
The euro crisis will have a substantial impact on the rest of the world, including the U.S. That is difficult to predict, but we'll know very soon. According to recent data, the world is heading into recession in almost all economies.
-
The federal government is currently running a $1.3 trillion annual deficit.
-
Unfunded liabilities for Social Security, Medicare, and prescription drug (Part D) are $116.4 trillion and growing. This does not include the pending problem with student loans (Sallie Mae) or obligations to GSEs.
-
The MF Global problem is indicative of a declining economy. It is likely that in a growing economy they would have been able to ride out their crisis. In a declining economy, company weaknesses tend to be revealed, as with Lehman. That creates market uncertainty.
-
Oil price have risen from $40 bbl post Crash to $110 bbl in April, 2011, and presently are at $97 bbl. Such oil price increases are associated with and often presage recessions.
-
Bank balance sheets are still weak because they do not book asset values at market, they seems to not properly book troubled loans, and they are encumbered by a substantial amount of malinvested assets that have not been liquidated.
-
47 million Americans (15%) are on Food Stamps. 48.5% of the population lived in a household that received some type of government benefit in the first quarter of 2010.
-
Americans' are pessimistic about their future and the future of America according to almost all recent polls.
-
An angry and disaffected population in America is potentially politically dangerous.
What is important when looking at the data is to spot trends rather than specific numbers. I have what I believe is a healthy skepticism about the reports from the multitude of federal agencies that I follow on a regular basis. They are often revised and probably understate the negatives. That is especially so with price inflation. Many of reports are in nominal numbers rather than adjusted for official price inflation. If they are adjusted for inflation (chained) their baseline is a recent year. Many analysts put great emphasis on specific numbers, but quantifiable data is ephemeral and probably "gamed". Look at the trend.
Part II
Tomorrow
Forecasting Flaws
No one can predict the future. There are too many variables.
For example, which party will control the government? If the Republicans win, will they make the major changes to government needed for real economic stability and recovery? Regardless of who wins, will Fed policy really change? Will the European Monetary Union disintegrate? Will emerging economies turn away from free market reforms? Will oil production in the Middle East be disrupted by political turmoil? Will major economies endorse leftist-socialist policies? Will the world break out with free market policies? Will the U.S. suffer another 9-11 attack? Will a volcano/earthquake/flood/tsunami/asteroid destroy a major country or the world? Will someone invent a cold fusion power source. Will ...
Stop thinking.
At best we can make educated guesses based on Austrian economic theory and a study of contemporary events. And, at best, we can only make generalizations at that. Hayek tells us that generalizations are as good as it gets; there are just too many individual decisions being made every day in the "economy" to quantify it and that is why economists' forecasts are mostly wrong. If they are right, they are probably just lucky. So far I've been lucky but at least I admit it.
Money
There are three factors driving the economy at this point and two of them are negative indicators. They are:
(i) real economic production;
(ii) exports (and imports);
(iii) quantitative easing.
Each of these factors has something in common and that is money supply and the actions of the Fed.
Real Production
If allowed to function without government interference, "economies" will correct themselves from the consequences of bad investments made during a boom-bust business cycle. People, consumers and business owners alike, will take care of their own problems by reducing debt, selling off bad assets, saving more, spending less, and even going bankrupt. That is, they will do what it takes to try to maintain their lifestyle.
That is exactly what has been going on, more or less under the radar because it is difficult to see and measure. We cannot accurately calculate how much activity is related to this, but the levels of debt write-down, savings levels, and capital spending by manufacturers give us some indication.
The amount of real capital/wealth in the U.S. is prodigious, often underestimated, and it remains the foundation of our capitalistic economy. Real capital is the things we have produced based on organic economic growth, not growth produced as a result of monetary stimulation. During the boom phase huge amounts of what people thought was capital/wealth was created but it was mostly fake, a product of fiat money steroids created by the Fed ("malinvestment"). Eventually malinvestment is always cured by the market. The problem with these boom-bust cycles is that fake capital/malinvestments also cause the destruction of real capital. Since this current cycle has been the biggest boom-bust event in world history, untold amounts of real capital was destroyed and that is what is holding back a recovery.
I don't wish to belabor points I have covered many times, but federal and state governments are doing all they can to prevent the liquidation of malinvestment; as pointed out above, consumer debt has not been significantly reduced, about 25% of all homes in America are underwater, personal savings are declining, and large amount of underperforming/ troubled commercial real estate loans still plague lenders. Until these things are corrected, recovery will be thwarted. The key to understanding this is that ultimately the markets will cure the problem and all government attempts to stop it are futile and have only served to delay recovery.
On the plus side, businesses have trimmed operations, including labor, to the proverbial bone, and they are making substantial investments in productivity (capital equipment) and related technology (software). Thus profits in general appear good, but not all profits come from expanded sales, but rather from operating efficiencies. They are positioning themselves for growth or decline and they remain cautious about the future.
The actions by businesses to gain efficiencies is a positive force in the economy and has been one of the drivers of the economy, but it is difficult to measure.
Exports
When the Secretary of the Treasury or the Chairman of the Fed say that the official policy of the U.S. is a strong dollar, they mean the exact opposite. The U.S. has been following a mercantilist policy which sees "nat5ional" prosperity through exports. They like a cheap dollar and are doing their best to continue to devalue it. Devaluation is a function of two things: deficit spending by the federal government and the Fed's willingness to de facto monetize federal debt. While exporters are favored, the other side of this is that savers and consumers suffer. Savers are consuming capital because of too low interest rates, and consumers have to pay more for imported goods. This policy is a definite negative for the longer-term well being of the economy.
As a result of this policy, exports have been expanding (see above chart). One way to measure the impact of export-based industries is to look at GDP (C+I+G+(X-Y) and subtract the "G". (Consumer Spending + Gross Investment + Government Spending + {Exports - Imports} = GDP). After all, governments only spend, they don't produce, and without C, I, and X and Y, they would have nothing to spend.
The total economy as measured by GDP is about $15 trillion. If you deduct government spending (per NIPA tables), about $6 trillion federal and state, the private economy is about $9 trillion. Exports in nominal terms are about $2.117 trillion of that, or about 24% of the total private economy, a very substantial amount. From the bottom in 2009 when exports shrank to about $1.525 trillion to $2.117 trillion today, exports jumped 39% in a very short time.
The only problem is that an export boom based on dollar devaluation cannot last. There is a limit to a government's ability to debase the money supply. One limit is inflation, perhaps runaway inflation, the other is a government's ability to sell its debt. At some point they have to abandon their inflationary policies or the markets or the voters will.
As the world appears to be heading into recession, slow economies will curb imports and this will impact U.S. importers in a significant way. At 24% of the economy, the U.S. economy will suffer.
Quantitative Easing
Money supply (MS) has been expanding as a result of QE1 and QE2.
Here is a chart of what Austrians call True Money Supply (TMS) that was prepared by Michael Pollaro of The Contrarian Take. I added the vertical time bars and the QE information:
This chart is a bit difficult to read but from late 2008 to June, 2011 the Fed pumped almost $2.1 trillion into the system in response to the initial crash (QE1). As the economy started to fade again in 2010 it put in its second round, QE2. QE2.5 (Operation Twist) is the Fed's attempt to keep long Treasury rates down and shifted its purchases of Treasurys from short-term to longer-term paper. The chart on the right, the red line, shows the history of the monetary infusions.
The left chart reveals that after QE1, MS (I use TMS2) grew until it peaked in December, 2009 (marked by the vertical red arrow). GDP responded and by Q2-2009 GDP starting rising until it peaked in Q2-2010. MS started shrinking again after December, 2009 as credit demand declined and loans were called or paid down, and banks parked money in excess reserves at the Fed. By the end of Q2-2010 GDP started to decline again after 12 months of growth. That prompted QE2 in November, 2010 and MS increased until August, 2011 where it may have peaked (see the second red arrow). GDP also followed, and as of Q3-2011 was increasing.
To summarize, every time the Fed injected money directly into the system via quantitative easing ("helicoptering"), GDP rose after a lag, and when MS started to decline after the injection of steroids ran its course, GDP declined after a lag. Very little real economic growth or capital formation occurred as a result of these Fed actions, otherwise they wouldn't have needed QE2, and that is why the economy will decline again. I am not suggesting that QE solves anything, but the numbers the Fed looks at will be declining (economic output, employment, price levels) and that will motivate them to do QE3 which they believe will have positive effects on the economy. It is also something that many investors follow and are hoping for. The hope that money "printing" will solve anything is misplaced; it will only cause further harm to the economy.
Pollaro provides the numbers behind the chart that show what the source and type of "money" is expanding or contracting. Not all increases in MS are inflationary. This goes into Misean monetary theory which is too complicated to go into here (see Pollaro's excellent description and definitions here). But, according to Pollaro's data, here is what is happening:
-
Inflationary bank credit (loans) have been expanding only very modestly (+7.3% YoY) and may be declining. That is why the above discussion of bank lending (consumer and C&I loans) was important. Loan volume has not taken off, small to medium businesses are not massively borrowing, and that is reflected in this aspect of MS.
-
Noninflationary time deposits have been growing (+12.6% YoY).1
-
Demand deposits have increased substantially (+33.5% YoY) Much of these funds are coming from investors fleeing the euro and are finding their way into excess reserves according to Pollaro and thus are potentially inflationary but haven't found their way into the economy through expanding bank credit. Another source of demand deposits are from the liquidation of time deposits. This can be inflationary. I believe the source has been mainly consumers liquidating savings accounts (time deposits) in order to fund consumption.
What does all this mean? MS (TMS2) is growing at 14.9% YoY. According to Pollaro, and I agree with his analysis,
As readers of the Monetary Watch are aware, the run-up to the housing bubble turned credit implosion turned Great Recession saw a string of 36 months of double digit growth for a cumulative increase of 48%. So, on the heels of two massive asset monetization programs – namely QE I and QE II – the Federal Reserve has been behind a monetary largesse that, in terms of time and size, is now 83% and 73%, respectively of that which brought on the Great Recession. Supported by a QE II asset purchase program still alive and kicking through the end of June, we estimate that this, our current monetary inflation cycle, will show a cumulative monetary infusion of about 37% by the time QE II is over, 77% the size of the last inflation cycle. Yes, not as large as the one that gave us the Great Recession, but one heck of a monetary inflation.
Crossroads Always Are Difficult
We are at a crossroad because with the world sliding into recession/depression, with the U.S. economy living off of exports, with a high level of unliquidated malinvestment, with a dearth of productive capital, and with money supply set to decrease, we are headed for economic decline which will impact the U.S. economy by Q2-2012 at the latest. It is likely that we will see another round of quantitative easing (QE3) before then as the numbers start to weaken and as unemployment starts to rise.
Outcomes
In light of all of the above caveats about forecasts, here are what I believe may be a reasonable future scenario:
-
Recent indicators show that most major economies are slowing down, perhaps heading into recession.
-
The EU is in crisis and weak governments threaten to jeopardize the EMU and the euro. The remedies proposed by the eurozone require bankrupt states to cut spending and increase taxes. This will create economic disruption and economic decline in the countries being bailed out. Greece may withdraw from the EMU. Perhaps only Germany will avoid major problems.
-
If the EMU chooses to inflate (print money through sovereign debt monetization), the euro will continue to decline as the result of price inflation. But, it is likely that will only temporarily relieve the pressure on bankrupt countries and their creditors.
-
U.S. exporters will face declining sales as a result of economic slowdowns in their markets. Pressures on the euro may give the dollar a temporary boost.
-
The U.S. economy will decline and we will see this not later than Q2-2012.
-
U.S. unemployment will increase.
-
The Fed will engage in QE3 as a result of political pressure on them to act.
-
The Fed may charge interest on excess reserves to encourage banks to lend. This will have the opposite effect on banks as credit conditions will actually tighten as money is driven into Treasurys and similar investments. This policy will not create loan demand.
-
QE3 is likely to kick off another round of euphoria in the financial markets, but this time corporate earnings will not be found to support price levels. The euphoria will be short-lived.
-
U.S. savings will decline as consumers turn to savings to fund their living expenses.
-
U.S. banks will accelerate write-downs of CRE debt.
-
Housing will continue to decline in the most vulnerable markets and will remain stagnant in other markets.
-
Bank failures will continue at a steady pace.
-
Prices will start to rise, but the better measure of the declining value of the dollar will be reflected in the price of gold which will continue to rise.
-
At best, the economy will stagnate as monetary inflation continues to destroy real capital.
-
If there are successive rounds of QE, each round will be less effective as more real capital is destroyed, but it will result in price inflation.
New And Old Dangers
As this never-ending business cycle drags on (we are in the fourth year of this recession), there are further dangers at this stage of the cycle. These issues involve political as well as economic considerations. It will require us all to do more critical thinking about the long term preservation of our wealth and the future of our society.
1. As things get worse, the Fed will yield to the demands of politicians to do something, and since they have run out of arrows in their policy quiver, they will do what all central banks do best: print money by more QE. While they say they can stimulate bank lending by imposing an interest charge on reserves kept at the Fed, in a declining economy it will not be a dearth of money but a dearth of borrowers that is the problem.
It is conceivable that as things progress the Fed may expand their attempts to revive the economy by purchasing other assets such as municipal bonds, more GSE debt, or even stocks. Assuming that unemployment rises to levels that will panic politicians (say, 12%), we can expect the Fed to do far more monetary expansion than Chairman Bernanke hints at. I do not believe it matters which party wins the election and who is president (other than Ron Paul). In a panic, they will always "print" money.
This raises the specter of high price inflation and even hyperinflation. The question is: how far they will go with monetary stimulus? I have written about this many times. In my opinion hyperinflation is always a political decision, and we will see price and wage controls and currency and commodity controls before that occurs. But high price inflation will do immense damage to the economy and society by further destroying real capital. It is not deflation we must fear, it is inflation (a rise in MS).
2. Fiscal stimulus will not be a viable policy tool in the near term whether or not the Republicans win the presidency. Assuming the Republicans at least control the House and/or the Senate, they will prevent further make-work projects and attempt to curb indebtedness. That is because they will campaign on a platform of fiscal integrity, a balanced budget, and reduced federal spending. However, I am cynical enough to believe that in an environment where unemployment grows to much higher levels, that even the Republicans will "do something" which will probably be futile massive spending on infrastructure as in Japan.
3. U.S. national debt is unacceptably high and with governments' current share of economic activity at 45.6% of GDP, this will act as a further brake on the economy. This is known as the Rahn Curve principle, where after a certain point it discourages investment and growth by the private sector. I believe we are at that point or close to it. America is a dynamic, entrepreneurial society so this is difficult to gauge.
The Rahn Curve aside, the weaker the economy becomes, and as debt remains high, the cost of funding our federal debt service may double as our credit rating is dinged. This will be a clear signal to the world of our second rate status as the U.S. is knocked off of its pedestal.
4. The European crisis is not just a European crisis, it's a worldwide crisis because a collapse of the European Monetary Union would cause financial chaos. Declining output in most EU countries will act as an accelerant of the problem because the bailouts are based on economic growth which would allow the bailed countries to meet certain fiscal targets. We may liken their banking crisis to the 2008 Crash that emanated from the U.S. and spread to the rest of the world. This is an unknown quantity at this time. Will the ECB print or not? Will the Germans keep banging their fiscal responsibility drum and oppose the ECB's purchase of members' sovereign debt? If they don't print, then there is a good possibility that countries other than Greece will fail and the European banking system will be put in jeopardy. Printing is not a fix but it will put the problem off for a while.
5. Political dissatisfaction is high. This is not uncommon in times of economic stress. But there are fundamental changes in attitudes about the role of government in society. For one, people look at government at being dysfunctional, but not for the reasons you were hoping for. People now believe that government can solve their problems but that partisan bickering is preventing politicians from achieving a "solution." That is quite different than saying government doesn't work and it is the cause of our problems.
The Occupy Wall Street movement is an example of this attitude coming from leftists who wish to see government ascendant. The Tea Party may be a genuine anti-government movement, but there are too many populist elements about it that makes me cautious about seeing it as an ultimate solution. But one can hope.
I think we are at a potentially dangerous point politically. These times can lead to demagoguery, populism, and appeals for a strong government which would have further negative long-term impacts to the economy.
If you are looking for light at the end of the tunnel, then the only glimmer I can see is a Republican, Tea Party inspired takeover in the 2012 elections. A new Fed Chairman who understands what money is, a repeal of Obamacare, and a serious restructuring of federal regulations and taxation would give the economy a tremendous boost. Nothing will be solved overnight, but it is perhaps the only chance we have to avoid economic mediocrity, fiscal bankruptcy, and monetary ruin.
I wish to thank DoctoRx for his time and valuable contributions to this white paper. His clear thinking made it a far better effort.
_____________________________________
1. Official price indices are in my opinion not accurate reflections of what prices are in the economy. There are other indices that may be more realistic and match consumers' every day experiences. I like Shadowstats. But to compare apples to apples, the BLS statistics are sufficient to indicate trends that are a result of monetary inflation.
2. If a depositor invests in a two year CD, she gives up ownership of those funds and the bank can lend them without expanding MS. On the other hand if the bank lends the funds for five years (duration mismatch) then some of those funds are indeed inflationary in the Austrian sense. Since bank credit is low, these issues have not been a significant factor in MS.
»
- Econophile's blog
- 11393 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Agree with Econophile, Republican inspired Tea Party ticket saves the day.
Contrary to MSM desires, the Tea Party is alive and well ... solid as ever.
Only Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, and Rick Santelli walk our talk.
Other candidates are unsupportable crypto-fascists.
Your Tea Party may be alive, but is it well?
It looks to me that it was hi-jacked by a mix of neo-cons and social right-wingnuts. Don't get me wrong. I like Santelli and I will votre for Paul if given a chance, but they don't seem to be driving the Tea Party Exress.
Let's see. As the economy crumbles and gets downgraded, how many abortion bills have we been entertained by this year alone? Is it 6 or is it 7. I lost count, but they are all coming from the new Tea Party gang in the House.
If allowed to function without government interference, "economies" will correct themselves from the consequences of bad investments made during a boom-bust business cycle. People, consumers and business owners alike, will take care of their own problems by reducing debt, selling off bad assets, saving more, spending less, and even going bankrupt. That is, they will do what it takes to try to maintain their lifestyle.
yeah, right...like that's what we've had the last 20+ years...a total lack of government regulation (interference) in the markets...how's that working for us?
If allowed to function without government interference, "economies" will correct themselves from the consequences of bad investments made during a boom-bust business cycle. People, consumers and business owners alike, will take care of their own problems by reducing debt, selling off bad assets, saving more, spending less, and even going bankrupt. That is, they will do what it takes to try to maintain their lifestyle.
yeah, right...like that's what we've had the last 20+ years...a total lack of government regulation (interference) in the markets...how's that working for us?
"I think we are at a potentially dangerous point politically. These times can lead to demagoguery, populism, and appeals for a strong government.."
Can you say "Weimar republic"...
If stealing half the national wealth and handing it to the bankers hasn't done the trick then steal it all!
The bankers are only intermediaries; they help to hand over wealth to China and the OPEC sheik's
Wait, Wait!! ...it's time for the 10:30 'rally'.
While the economy may have stabilized in the shoprt term, absolutely none of the financial problems have been corrected, as evidenced by MF Global. We live in a time of thievery at all levels, the Fed steals through inflation, banks steal through bailouts, politicians steal through crony capitalism and the little guy is forced to steal to survive. The only way out is to become as self sufficient as possible and try and choke off the system. http://www.futunamics.com/goinggalt.php
"Whether that will be a positive or a negative is often difficult to tell"
No, it's not difficult to tell. For the past 30 years most of the developed world has been using credit to artificially maintain a fundamentally unjustified standard of living and artificially pumped GDPs. Now, when we've hit a debt servicing wall, private debt has been transferred to the public tab and the pols are unwilling to screw their masters (the banks) by forcing them to eat their losses and unwilling to foster revolutions by taking away promised benefits from their voting public. Thus, the market will have to force such changes which means that they won't take place in an optimal fashion designed to minimize negative impacts.
"Full fathom five thy father lies,
Of his bones are coral made,
Those are pearls that were his eyes,
Nothing of him that doth fade,
But doth suffer a sea-change,
into something rich and strange,
Sea-nymphs hourly ring his knell,
Ding-dong.
Hark! now I hear them, ding-dong, bell."
Thanks Ariel.
So much bullshit in your paper, so little time to respond. The one that got me was that the Republicans would campaign on a platform of fiscal integrity, a balanced budget, and reduced Federal spending. Oh, like George W. Bush? The Republican fraud and corruption is no different than Democratic fraud and corruption. They are all sleazes clothed in the American flag to rally the sheeple. If you believe the OWS movement is leftist, you are part of the problem.
Both parties suck but if Corzine was a Republican he would be in jail today. The Dems are total scum.
Freddie...you, too, are part of the problem.
As former head of GS, I'll bet you that Corzine had plenty of Republican blow jobs.
My God (Econophile) you're stupid.
"The Occupy Wall Street movement is an example of this attitude coming from leftists who wish to see government ascendant. The Tea Party may be a genuine anti-government movement, but there are too many populist elements about it that makes me cautious about seeing it as an ultimate solution. But one can hope.
I think we are at a potentially dangerous point politically. These times can lead to demagoguery, populism, and appeals for a strong government which would have further negative long-term impacts to the economy."
OMG. The economy is in jeopardy. Who knew. Let's prepare.
hey, you left out Wharton School (U Penn)
Rape the middle class. Tax cuts for the 1%. There fixed for you.
Virtually all of your data points show the US economy has stabilized at a minimum and most charts are positive or neutral, yet your summations all major negative bias.
The banking cartel is threatening to burn the house down again if they don't get a CB to step in and buy their Euro paper. The real economy is not doing so bad in the US, the paper 'market' economy is hijacked by the big boys as a proxy to impose their will on the world because the 'market' wants it. Well the 'market' ain't mom and pop it is the dozen or so major banking powerhouses around the globe. The manipulation is so obvious anymore. Now the big banks will get what they want or they will shit on the holidays for investors. Time to rid the world of the SIFI's. Enough is enough.
What the F has it come to in this world that the Banks now run the show? They blew up the GD economy, then put a gun to the head of .gov and convinced the congress critters to give them trillions or there would be 'Tanks in the Streets'. Now we are just getting stabilized and real growth emerging and they gotta shake up the snow globe again creating uncertainty for businesss who will put off hiring and expanding their business all for the sake of the same fucks who trashed the place. Do I sound upset? God the shit is enough to make you want to put a gun in a bankers mouth. This shit has got to end somehow.
Fuck the banks, this is what you get with globalization, every single nation wants to be a "producer" and not a "consumer". Sorry, that's impossible. The joke is that ever since the establishment of the U.N. and IMF it really has been a one world government. The banks (or more specifically the few families that are on the other side of the debt held by all central banks) have known this for a very long time and they, like many of the elite Harvard and Stanford trained financial fucknuts really do beleive that they are above everyone else, closer to God and doing His work. I laughed at this until I married my wife and actually spent some time with her two brothers, both venture capital Harvard-trained financial guys.
My business produces a REAL product that improves people's lives. They push paper around and their compensation is 1,000 times that of my entire operation.
Pretty clear why things are getting crazy, simply put these paper pushing fucknuts are realizing that more people are seeing through their horseshit. The ONLY people who fear a complete and total collapse are those who know that there is no real value in their labor, be it intellectual or physical labor. Fuck them and let compensation (in whatever form that may be) return to people who are actually worth a shit. Lots of powerful people now realizing that they didn't get out in time, only people who win moving forward will be the fucking attorneys. Add to this a populace that in large part does not even understand where their food comes from much less MATH and shit starts getting real ugly real quick. Got physical? Know your neighbors? You fucking better.
Lead is the only metal worth shit.
re The economy is in jeopardy
Wow! I had no idea! Thanks for the update - keep 'em comin ! tia
Brussels, the center cannot hold. In the counties our tax base is down by one third. The thirty somethings are out of work and out of time. They are packing up their kids and moving in with their parents. The only way to sustain the status quo is to print. Continue to do that and you destroy the real wealth of the boomers, the moms and pops who are backstopping the thirtysomethings. Once that is gone, the thirtysomethings will join the twentysomethings in the street. You may relish the smell of burning tires in the streets. I do not. Much of what the federal government does is redundant. Every state has its own law enforcement, drug enforcement, department of education, department of transportation and social services. The century long effort to micromanage our lives from Washington has run out of money. We either shrink the beast or it will turn totalitarian. If it turns totalitarian there will be another civil war.
Chin up Clound9.5, the availability of resources, particularly water and energy will shrink things regardless. Besides, you really expect the average sheeple to stop texting to go fight a civil war? Out of all my employees, the more seasoned ones are still the best. The younger generation has it's head so far up it ass it isn't funny.
"Besides, you really expect the average sheeple to stop texting to go fight a civil war?"
Precisely....it's when large numbers of them can no longer afford to text that all hell breaks out, and the revolution begins in ernest.
Civil war comes if the government turns totalitarian and attempts to disarm the population.
Potentially, but that would simply lead to a very profitable time for TPTB as they would be supplying the rounds for both sides.
As a reloader and target shooter, I have a hand on the pulse of ammunition sales. Millions of rounds of ammunition were bought up and stockpiled by the private sector in the run up and aftermath of the Obama election. That stuff has a shelf life of half a century.
It's all about political will to start moving economies in directions that use sustainable and sane methods of managing available resources. Lacking that will in the powers that be, we are all fucked and the day to day gyrations in markets and the world stage in general don't matter much, the outcome is disaster.
So fucked it is then.
Pretty much. People tend to get the kind of government they deserve.
Some don't deserve it but they'll get it anyhow.
"The economy is in jeopardy"
Dude. Seriously? That's your title?
I think he meant to write, "The Ponzi is in jeopardy." The economy is no more as we knew it. Seems to me that things are right on track. The only REAL objective of TPTB is to let it hit with a thud instead of a crash. All they can do is alter the angle of the slope of decline, not change the inclination to positive. There is no engine that can boost the economy up such a steep slope. He states that 45% of GDP is gov't spending at all levels. What does that fact alone tell us? Good luck with the plan, eh?
the current WORLD agenda is the standoff in Euro land between the market (GS induced) and Merkel.
Until this gets resolved the world stays in financial turmoil and political limbo. Even if Merkel concedes to big EURO Bazooka, it looks like the world economic tailspin is beyond control. As the Ninja HFs will continue to pummel away; even if it brings WS and Euro zone to its knees and consequently they with the others into the fire.
Scary game of suicidal beggar thy neighbour arm twisting and hope you are not the Devil's victim as hindmost; more his disciple and harbinger of foggy bottom. We all lose, some more than others.
So the 'Econophile' person writing this imagines that:
« ... light at the end of the tunnel ... a Republican, Tea Party inspired takeover in the 2012 elections ... »
Isn't it well-documented that the so-called 'Tea Party' candidates for the most part instantly sold out to the US oligarchy establishment after they got elected, totally betraying most of the Tea Party original principles?
This Econophile person wants to elect more of them?
Isn't this just the flip side of the 'Hope and Change' Obama - Democrat fantasy fraud of 2008 ... now the American people are supposed to buy the Republican party 'get government off your back' fantasy bullsh*t pipe dream one more time? When the last US Republican Presidential nominee who was as sincere about that as Ron Paul, was probably Barry Goldwater in 1964? 'In your heart you know he's right ...'
How many times are the US citizens going to be fooled by the thought that a Democrat victory, or a Republican victory, is anything other than a rotating leadership of the US Oligarch Cabal?
How many times? I will give you the answer if you tell me how many times we have left.....because that is how long the ill-informed, out-to-lunch public is going to continue to vote for the shills that run for office. Right up to the bitter end.
Even on this blog, we see this dumbass right/left political dialog take place, even though most here understand that "party" makes little difference in outcome. Mr. Econophile is full of shit, too. This reads like something he would send out to a bunch of his IRA & 401K account holders as he lubes them up for the hosing fast approaching. Methinks he is concerned for the 1%...or .01%, and wants desperately for the status quo to be upheld.
Oh, at least once more, I'd say.
This white paper is TOTALLY CLUELESS ABOUT POLITICS...
REPUBLICANS ARE OWNED by the Military Industrial Complex and every other corporate interest, that does not serve Middle Class interests...
...And Wall Street would continue to run Washington and America.
...Didn't National Debt TRIPLE during Reaganomics #1 1981-1993? And didn't National Debt DOUBLE during Reaganomics #2 2001-2009? Huh?
.....one thing you forgot......"DEMOCRATS ARE OWNED by the Unions and Gov't workers and every other corporate interest, that does not serve Middle Class interests..."
Now, with that addition, this may be credible. Without it the statement seems like it is coming from a starry eyed left winger.
But I thought everybody in the US was "middle class." Leastwise 99% are, right?
BTW----- RON PAUL in 2012.
LOL. A starry eyed believer in Faeries, Eskimos and votes? Ron Paul is still part of the problem. You cannot fix the game from the inside when the game is rigged.
It must all come down and be recorded for use as an example of what worked and what didn't when it's finally time to rebuild.
"Isn't it well-documented that the so-called 'Tea Party' candidates for the most part instantly sold out to the US oligarchy establishment after they got elected, totally betraying most of the Tea Party original principles?"
Yes. So let's elect the ultimate sell-out Newt Gingrinch (sic).
When the market leaves it skint
Then a nation must print.