This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
High-Level Officials Eager to Spill the Beans About What REALLY Happened on 9/11 … But No One In Washington or the Media Wants t
9/11 Commission Admits It Never Got The Facts ... But No One Wants to Hear From the People Who Know What Happened
9/11 Commission: We Never Got All of the Facts
9/11 Commissioners admit that they never got to the bottom of 9/11. For example:
- 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says "I don't believe for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue
- 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that "There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ." He also says that it might take "a permanent 9/11 commission" to end the remaining mysteries of September 11
Indeed, 9/11 Commissioners and other officials say that the true facts were hidden from them, or covered up (you don't have to get bogged down in reading this section - you can skip ahead to the next, if you like; this is just documenting that the 9/11 Commission report is in no way the last word on 9/11):
- The 9/11 Commission’s co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements (free subscription required)
- 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”
- 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”
- The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – recently said “At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.” And he said: “It’s almost a culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were interviews made at the FAA’s New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed. The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way things happened”
- A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials, and who has for years been a tireless anti-war advocate and critic of imperial foreign policy (Raymond McGovern) said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”
- A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill Christison) said “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe (and see this)
- A number of intelligence officials, including a CIA Operations Officer who co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence efforts among many intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Lynne Larkin) sent a joint letter to Congress expressing their concerns about “serious shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in the 9/11 Commission Report and offering their services for a new investigation (they were ignored)
- A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called “perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that “the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job
- The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 – 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 – 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said “The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup”
- According to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, an FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House (confirmed here)
- Congressman Ron Paul calls for a new 9/11 investigation and states that “we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on”
- Congressman Dennis Kucinich hints that we aren’t being told the truth about 9/11
- Congressman Jason Chafetz says that we need to be vigilant and continue to investigate 9/11
- Senator Lincoln Chaffee endorses a new 9/11 investigation
- Congressman Dan Hamburg doesn’t believe the official version of events
- Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9something very different from the Bush-Cheney version of events occurred on 9/11
- U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart (General Wesley Clark) said “We’ve never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I’ve seen that for a long time”
- Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who’s who of liberals and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11
- Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) says “The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence”
- The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of accepting responsibility
- Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that the official story of 9/11 is “the dog that doesn’t hunt”
- Several key employees for the defense department say that the government covered up their testimony about tracking Mohammed Atta before 9/11
- The former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh) says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission
High-Level Officials Want to Explain 9/11 ... But Are Being Gagged
There are high-level officials who can tell us why 9/11 happened ... but they are being ignored or gagged.
As Senator Patrick Leahy said that Congress doesn't want to know what happened:
The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush’s watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?
And the people who can explain what happened are being gagged.
FBI Translator - "The Most Gagged Person" In History
For example, former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds - President of the National Security Whistleblower Coalition - who has been deemed credible by the Department of Justice's Inspector General, several senators (free subscription required), and a coalition of prominent conservative and liberal groups - has fought for years to testify about what she knows about 9/11, and has repeatedly asked to be subpoenaed (so as to avoid violation of her oath of secrecy as a government employee).
The ACLU described Edmonds as:
The most gagged person in the history of the United States of America.
And famed Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg says that Edmonds possesses information "far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers".
Not a single politicians or prosecutor has been willing to issue a subpoena.
Edmonds also made the following offer:
If anyone of the major networks --- ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, FOX --- promise to air the entire segment, without editing, I promise to tell them everything that I know," about everything mentioned above, she told us.
"I can tell the American public exactly what it is, and what it is that they are covering up," she continued. "I'm not compromising ongoing investigations," Edmonds explained, because "they've all been shut down since."
Not a single major network has let Edmonds say what she knows.
Indeed, Ellsberg says that the government has ordered the media not to touch Edmonds:
Ellsberg seemed hardly surprised that today’s American mainstream broadcast media has so far failed to take [former FBI translator and 9/11 whistleblower Sibel] Edmonds up on her offer, despite the blockbuster nature of her allegations.
As Edmonds has also alluded, Ellsberg pointed to the New York Times, who “sat on the NSA spying story for over a year” when they “could have put it out before the 2004 election, which might have changed the outcome.”
“There will be phone calls going out to the media saying ‘don’t even think of touching it, you will be prosecuted for violating national security,’” he told us.
* * *
“I am confident that there is conversation inside the Government as to ‘How do we deal with Sibel?’” contends Ellsberg. “The first line of defense is to ensure that she doesn’t get into the media. I think any outlet that thought of using her materials would go to to the government and they would be told ‘don’t touch this . . . .‘”
Other Whistleblowers Being Silenced
Edmonds also says that she has been contacted by two high-ranking military officers who would like to shed light on 9/11, but - due to their oaths of secrecy - can only do so if subpoenaed. No one in Washington wants to issue a subpoena.
High-Level Military Intelligence Officer: No One In Washington Wants To Know
Similarly, a high-level military intelligence officer says that his unit - tasked with tracking Bin Laden prior to 9/11 - was pulled off the task, and there warnings that the World Trade Center and Pentagon were being targeted were ignored.
Moreover, he says that he has information that can shed light on 9/11, and that he has repeatedly tried to get this information to the Obama administration and Congress, but that no one in the administration or Congress wants to hear about it. As just one example, Nancy Pelosi's office demanded that he not even email any information which he has about 9/11.
He is still working in military intelligence, and so he can only publicly speak about 9/11 if he is subpoenaed. He is therefore asking that he be subpoenaed ... but no one wants to look into it:
There are numerous other whistleblowers with key information about 9/11. But no one in the government or media wants to hear what they know.
9/11 was one of the most important events in American history, as 10 years of war in numerous countries - costing trillions of dollars - and the crackdown on liberties like freedom of speech have all been justified by that one event. And yet the politicians in D.C. and the corporate media don't want to hear from the people who can explain the gross incompetence (or worse) which occurred on that day
»
- advertisements -
bingo.
Everyone with 2 working brain cells knows that 9/11 was a false flag operation.
I'll take your word for it. What about those with more than two?
This is what happens when Banksters don't get their way. Prepare accordingly, the US as a nation is about to be punished for not buying into their casino games...
janus pulls off very many spelling and grammatical murders. janus must be Sheva, the God of Death! janus was Special fuckin Ops, after all. No wonder janus' college teachers will not accept his term papers. They smell like shit.
Picking 9/11 as the date was psyop 101. Many associate it with emergency/police/fire and go into cognitive dissonance.
WTC7 had all the Eron docs, plus the Mayor's Emergency Command Center (that he couldn't use because somebody else was, agh, gasp,uh.......)
Sibel Edmonds. An FBI translator going over intercepts shortly after 9/11.
Turkish Generals, Arms Dealers, Terrorists, Drug Traffickers, US politicians (Denny Hastert in particular). All linked together over what?
The stench is overwhelming but that gag order remains in place. Fiction is more appealing than the reality. The US populace prefers blue pill.
i have always suspected her to be a limited cutout disinformation person............if she was really all about the real truth she would have been dead a long time ago.....
I don't really believe you could gag people over something as important as this.
What really needs to be assessed is the U.S. actions following it. Using the events as an excuse to apply orwellian regulations
and invade countries who had nothing to do with the events, while the people sit by and watch.
do you seriously think we would have rushed into war without that event? do you sense a connection between the two? Does not our own country have a history of planting false flags to enter or acclerate wars?
Two planes Three buildings. Anyone who can watch the video of Bldg.#7 collapsing and swallow the claim that planes brought it down will swallow anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atbrn4k55lA Free Fall Speed? WTF?
If they "spill the beans" will they FART also?
I'm telling you Tyler, Pelosi set up the whole fucken plot.
Sorry Tyler, but Sarkozy needs to get the truth too :
T'as compris que je ne plaiderais pas coupable à un crime que je n'ai pas commis? Tu es un vrai génie de l'analyse, toi...
Thanks George for speaking the truth and keeping this alive.
Two planes Three buildings. Anyone who can watch the video of Bldg.#7 collapsing and swallow the claim that planes brought it down will swallow anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Atbrn4k55lA Free Fall Speed? WTF?
Question - Did the link to your blog dissapear from "Zero Hedge Reads" on the left of the ZH home page?
=============================================================================
First became last. Last became first. Descending chronical order for posts!?! Never seen that before.
Is this to bury janus, the misdirection retard? <Appologies in advance to all retards offended by the comparison.
Apology accepted.
;)
WT 7 did not collapse at free fall speed. If you watch the video, you will see a corner of the bldg. slump as the structural support gives way, then about 5 seconds elapse, then the rest of the bldg's supports fail and it collapses. I'm not having a go at you, I'm just trying to correct a common misconception about WT 7.
Please don't show them the photos of the north section of WTC7 lying across the debris from the collapse of the penthouses, indicating that it fell south after the rest of the building came down. Also, don't post any link to the seismic read on the collapse, as it indicates a collapse that took a lot longer than "free fall" time. And really don't post the entire transcript of the NYFD, who discussed the scope of the fire, the area that showed the twenty story hole torn into it by debris from the north tower, the fact that the building was creaking and leaning and that as early as 2pm firefighters on the scene said they expected the tower to fall at any time.
Did you even watch the linked video? What few people bring up is the FACT that the columns under the penthouse areas collapse first, and those columns were NOT damaged by any debris at all. I really don't give a damn about the damage done by falling debris from buildings 1 and 2. What matters is that the columns which were not damaged collapsed before the ones that were damaged. How the hell do you explain that without introducting explosives? This doesn't even address the speed of the collapse either.
Watched them all. Read the reports. Visited most of the websites, for and against the official version. Spoke with friends who were there, and one who watched the AA jet hit the Pentagon. Not a fan of Bush, greatly dislike Cheney, was always against the Iraq War. Have had first hand experience with al Qaeda. Read and speak Arabic, and have been all over the ME and South Asia. Read, but not speak, Urdu.
My experience visiting the conspiracy sites is that they rely on the same kind of sophistry GW tries to use, such as quotes out of context or hiding facts (WTC7 extensive damge from the north tower collapse, unaddressed fires buring from mid morning, firefighters anticipating a collapse, etc.)
Nothing fits the events of the day better than the official story. Incompetence and covering arses, yes, conspiracy, no.
Wow Chindit13 that's some resume'. How exactly does one get first hand experiance with Al Qaeda? What job takes you all over the ME and South Asia and gives you an ability to read but not speak Urdu? Sounds like the sort of experiance only a trained CIA spook would have. Or a desk jockey for NSA. Keep up the good work.
No, just "experiance" as the official 7th floor barber. That got me lots of time with George, Bobby, Stansfield---not so much with Mike or Jim---but Porter and Leon were particularly fastidious, so they sat in the chair weekly. Also did some beard trimming on ObL before he went pure Wahabi and swore off everything but the color touch ups. And those ME Sheikhs! I could tell you stories.... Well, let's just say those ghutras hide a multitude of fashion sins.
troll, there was just a little office fire and WTC 7 collapsed. Have seen whole skycrapers in beijing on fire. nothing happened.
You might want to be able to differentiate between speed and acceleration before making comments.
http://youtu.be/rVCDpL4Ax7I
there are about 1500 architects and engineers that would disagree with you.
More accurately, 1500 members of the A&E organization. Being either an engineer or an architect is not a prerequisite for membership.
wrong again a-hole. i signed up with ae911, but since i am a practicing but not degreed engineer, i am not counted among the 1500+. i was called and vetted by a representative of ae911, who asked me point blank if my degree was in engineering. hearing my answer, she thanked me for willing to be associated with the organization, but not counted among those with the credentials deemed necessary.
one more chindit13 bs flattened.
You are a liar.
All 1,555 are architects or engineers. Aside from the 1,555 A&Es, the group has almost 13,000 other supporters.
slump?
the same word used to describe kennedy when he was shot
interesting
9/11 was an inside job, a false flag ops to get public support for the "war against terrorism".
That's right, and the reason the media won't cover the facts is they are Israel-first just like our politicians. The US is run by Israel, plain and simple. It's the JWO.
that's right . you know who did 911 and i know who did 911 and so now for ten years people have been arguing about this shit. i am not going to spend a lot of time arguing about 911 today. i am so disgusted with the gulag amerika i can hardly stand it. those who know, already know. those who don't know, will never know. so be it. i understand this and i accept it. it is a difficult reality pill to swallow but as can be seen by reading some of the posts around here, nothing ever changes with amerikans. so be it.......
Geroge Washington: Crackpot news aggregator. Cut and paste this, bitch.
George:
I keep up with the facts and had questions the day after. I waited because most the info was from the media and they are usually wrong this early in the game. Then more enquiring minds began asking questions and more questions emerged.
Bush and his boys did it to muster simpathy which they turned into justifiable retaliation and here we are today.
A and E for the truth about 9/11 have all the details and have more which has since disappeared from the internet. Building 7 was not hit, the pentagon was not hit and the planes that hit the towers were not airlines but military. ok.
What happened to the people. Not the people in the towers but the people in the planes? How were they dispossed of?
I just cannot get my head around the possibility of these people being exterminated and being written off as colateral damage...what ever that means.
What kind of people would have done this to thier own countrymen?
this is a very important barrier to beginning to take in the truth, which is piling up high & deep all around us. . .
what kind of people? those who know there are no "nationstates" but merely space carved up & occasionally shuffled between the players, who "inherit" their perspectives and keep the game rolling along over centuries.
these people are not your, or anyone's, "countrymen" - they have no sense of that, it's a story they feed to the creatures they "own," be it through debt or by accident of birth somewhere on the planet. . .
when you finally see through the illusion of "nations" & loyalty to those ideas, you'll see how the game is played over centuries, and can begin to extricate your mind from the storyboard.
a huge step to be sure, and one you won't get much support for from those around you, but if it's your destiny, I wish you truth.
(p.s. you're in the right place, here.)
The same amount of 'people' were written off at Pearl Harbor, and details of that fiasco are still surfacing 80 years later.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/pearl_harbor.htmTo address this one aspect of the alternate 9/11 narrative, I don't see how (or why) if it was "an inside job" that the insiders would swap out military aircraft for commercial airliners, and liquidate the passangers. Logically, who would even fly the planes into the Twin Towers or the Pentagon? If it was done by remote control, why not just remote control the commercial airliners?
i think he was more referring to the fact that 2 of the four airliners allegedly crashed that day continued on in service...listed as in service and flying by the FAA at least until early '07
Also ... nobody has ever explained why there were no families waiting in vain at LAX for the "passengers" to arrive from the east coast at the scheduled arrival times. I guess the explanation from the 9-11 Deniers will be that they just "went home" as soon as they heard some planes had gone down somewhere.............
The trouble with central planners is that they just don't plan everything properly ... and they always overlook the "little things" that lead to unintended consequences.
i have always wondered about the passengers on those jets. what if there never were any passengers? hmmm? interesting point......the people over at letsroll911forum have been discussing this aspect for some time........
"Security" at Boston's Logan airport was being provided by ... an Israeli company.
HDP - I was in the Homeland. It was often creepy. I can return any time.
everything is ok now, you will have lots of new /refurbished bridges soon, all over the country . all the better to jump off.
Are they covering up simple incompetence or something worse ?
WTC Buildings 1,2 and 7.
A downed plane with no wreckage.
Pentagon damage not consistent with a passenger airliner crash.
They must think people are stupid ..
Please illuminate.
Which plane had no wreckage?
Exactly how is the Pentagon damage not consistent with a passenger airliner crash?
Turning your argument against you, why didn't the whole Pentagon come crashing down? Even building 7 which was not hit by a plane came down. Yet the Pentagon had just a little hole after supposedly getting hit by a jet plane with fuel, etc...
The damage hole's not nearly big enough to accomodate the engines and the wings, both of which are among the strongest structures in an airliner.
Which hole, the entrance or nose exit (i.e., the one cited by "Loose Change"). Seventy five feet is a good sized hole, especially considering that the plane twisted hitting those five light poles and that generator before striking the building. Got spatial orientation skills?
The nose exited and created that 16 foot hole cited by Loose Change. Steel reinforced concrete beams, plus the friction of sliding along the ground before impact dissipated a lot of momentum and did some major structural damage to the airliner (followed and observed by a C-130 pilot in the air at the time of attack, who reported before the crash that it was an American Airlines commercial jet).
Lots of other witnesses, too, reported a commercial airliner. Anyway, given that two airliners quite obviously hit the north and south towers in NYC, do you think the "conspirators" suddenly ran out of funds to get another jet and had to resort to a missile? I mean, that's like wondering why people supposedly willing to slaughter 2900 innocents would opt for the time and expense of "controlled demolition" vs. a simple planting of massive charges at keystones and sending two 110-story towers slaying in different directions. Did they have some death quota? Did they suddenly develop a conscience?
Loose Change is easily the worst 9/11 video series out there. Replete with BS. Go to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. Their science is MUCH harder to debunk, which is why you shills/useful idiots always go to Loose Change. Debunk the videos I threw out earlier or better yet fix the holes blown in the NIST report by: http://www.ae911truth.org/
I won't hold my breath, I'm sure you got a few pathetic tricks up your sleeves, but nothing that can EVER substantiate the mockery that was the 400+ day DELAYED 9/11 Commission. Sure were a lot of delays and coverups around this, not to mention evidence destruction. But you don't care, you must not, will not countenance that your protector overlords would ever mean you harm. You've been benefitting off the system for years and want to protect the status quo. You are the worst sort of coward, like the Warburgs saying nothing bad was happening to Jews in 1930's Germany, you are selling out your own people.
no but if you believe anything from Loose Change you are stupid.