This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Millions of Evangelical Christians Want to Start WWIII to Speed the "Second Coming" ... and Atheist Neocons are Using Religion
MILLIONS OF EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS WANT TO START WORLD WAR III ... TO SPEED UP THE SECOND COMING
The Founding Fathers weren't particularly anti-Islam.
But millions of Americans believe that Christ will not come again until Israel wipes out its competitors and there is widespread war in the Middle East. Some of these folks want to start a huge fire of war and death and destruction, so that Jesus comes quickly.
According to French President Chirac, Bush told him that the Iraq war was needed to bring on the apocalypse:
In Genesis and Ezekiel Gog and Magog are forces of the Apocalypse who are prophesied to come out of the north and destroy Israel unless stopped. The Book of Revelation took up the Old Testament prophesy:
“And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.”
Bush believed the time had now come for that battle, telling Chirac:
“This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people’s enemies before a New Age begins”…
There can be little doubt now that President Bush’s reason for launching the war in Iraq was, for him, fundamentally religious. He was driven by his belief that the attack on Saddam’s Iraq was the fulfilment of a Biblical prophesy in which he had been chosen to serve as the instrument of the Lord.
And British Prime Minister Tony Blair long-time mentor, advisor and confidante said:
“Tony’s Christian faith is part of him, down to his cotton socks. He believed strongly at the time, that intervention in Kosovo, Sierra Leone – Iraq too – was all part of the Christian battle; good should triumph over evil, making lives better.”
Mr Burton, who was often described as Mr Blair’s mentor, says that his religion gave him a “total belief in what’s right and what’s wrong”, leading him to see the so-called War on Terror as “a moral cause”…
Anti-war campaigners criticised remarks Mr Blair made in 2006, suggesting that the decision to go to war in Iraq would ultimately be judged by God.
Bill Moyers reports that the organization Christians United for Israel - led by highly-influential Pastor John C. Hagee - is a universal call to all Christians to help factions in Israel fund the Jewish settlements, throw out all the Palestinians and lobby for a pre-emptive invasion of Iran. All to bring Russia into a war against us causing World War III followed by Armageddon, the Second Coming and The Rapture. See this and this.
This all revolves around what is called Dispensationalism. So popular is Dispensationalism that Tim LaHaye's Left Behind series has sold 65 million copies. Dispensationalists include the following mega-pastors and their churches:
They are supported by politicians such as:
- Texas Senator John Cronyn
- Former House Minority Whip Roy Blunt
- Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay
- And others
Dr. Timothy Webber - an evangelical Christian who has served as a teacher of church history and the history of American religion at Denver Seminary and Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Vice-President at Northern Baptist Theological Seminary in Lombard, IL, and President of Memphis Theological Seminary in Tennessee - notes:
In a recent Time/CNN poll, more than one-third of Americans said that since the terrorist attacks of 9/11, they have been thinking more about how current events might be leading to the end of the world.
While only 36 percent of all Americans believe that the Bible is God's Word and should be taken literally, 59 percent say they believe that events predicted in the Book of Revelation will come to pass. Almost one out of four Americans believes that 9/11 was predicted in the Bible, and nearly one in five believes that he or she will live long enough to see the end of the world. Even more significant for this study, over one-third of those Americans who support Israel report that they do so because they believe the Bible teaches that the Jews must possess their own country in the Holy Land before Jesus can return.
Millions of Americans believe that the Bible predicts the future and that we are living in the last days. Their beliefs are rooted in dispensationalism, a particular way of understanding the Bible's prophetic passages, especially those in Daniel and Ezekiel in the Old Testament and the Book of Revelation in the New Testament. They make up about one-third of America's 40 or 50 million evangelical Christians and believe that the nation of Israel will play a central role in the unfolding of end-times events. In the last part of the 20th century, dispensationalist evangelicals become Israel's best friends-an alliance that has made a serious geopolitical difference.
***
Starting in the 1970s, dispensationalists broke into the popular culture with runaway best-sellers, and a well-networked political campaign to promote and protect the interests of Israel. Since the mid-1990s, tens of millions of people who have never seen a prophetic chart or listened to a sermon on the second coming have read one or more novels in the Left Behind series, which has become the most effective disseminator of dispensationalist ideas ever.
***
During the early 1980s the Israeli Ministry of Tourism recruited evangelical religious leaders for free "familiarization" tours. In time, hundreds of evangelical pastors got free trips to the Holy Land. The purpose of such promotional tours was to enable people of even limited influence to experience Israel for themselves and be shown how they might bring their own tour group to Israel. The Ministry of Tourism was interested in more than tourist dollars: here was a way of building a solid corps of non-Jewish supporters for Israel in the United States by bringing large numbers of evangelicals to hear and see Israel's story for themselves. The strategy caught on.
***
Shortly after the Six-Day War, elements within the Israeli government saw the potential power of the evangelical subculture and began to mobilize it as a base of support that could influence American foreign policy. The Israeli government sent Yona Malachy of its Department of Religious Affairs to the United States to study American fundamentalism and its potential as an ally of Israel. Malachy was warmly received by fundamentalists and was able to influence some of them to issue strong pro-Israeli manifestos. By the mid-1980s, there was a discernible shift in the Israeli political strategy. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Jewish state's major lobbying group in Washington, D.C., started re-aligning itself with the American political right-wing, including Christian conservatives. Israel's timing was perfect. It began working seriously with American dispensationalists at the precise moment that American fundamentalists and evangelicals were discovering their political voice.
***
Probably the largest pro-Israel organization of its kind is the National Unity Coalition for Israel, which was founded by a Jewish woman who learned how to get dispensationalist support. NUCI opposes "the establishment of a Palestinian state within the borders of Israel."
***
In their commitment to keep Israel strong and moving in directions prophesied by the Bible, dispensationalists are supporting some of the most dangerous elements in Israeli society. They do so because such political and religious elements seem to conform to dispensationalist beliefs about what is coming next for Israel. By lending their support-both financial and spiritual-to such groups, dispensationalists are helping the future they envision come to pass.
***
Dispensationalists believe that the Temple is coming too; and their convictions have led them to support the aims and actions of what most Israelis believe are the most dangerous right-wing elements in their society, people whose views make any compromise necessary for lasting peace impossible. Such sentiments do not matter to the believers in Bible prophecy, for whom the outcome of the quarrelsome issue of the Temple Mount has already been determined by God.
Since the end of the Six-Day War, then, dispensationalists have increasingly moved from observers to participant-observers. They have acted consistently with their convictions about the coming Last Days in ways that make their prophecies appear to be self-fulfilling.
***
As Paul Boyer has pointed out, dispensationalism has effectively conditioned millions of Americans to be somewhat passive about the future and provided them with lenses through which to understand world events. Thanks to the sometimes changing perspectives of their Bible teachers, dispensationalists are certain that trouble in the Middle East is inevitable, that nations will war against nations, and that the time is coming when millions of people will die as a result of nuclear war, the persecution of Antichrist, or as a result of divine judgment. Striving for peace in the Middle East is a hopeless pursuit with no chance of success.
***
For the dispensational community, the future is determined. The Bible's prophecies are being fulfilled with amazing accuracy and rapidity. They do not believe that the Road Map will-or should-succeed. According to the prophetic texts, partitioning is not in Israel's future, even if the creation of a Palestinian state is the best chance for peace in the region. Peace is nowhere prophesied for the Middle East, until Jesus comes and brings it himself. The worse thing that the United States, the European Union, Russia, and the United Nations can do is force Israel to give up land for a peace that will never materialize this side of the second coming. Anyone who pushes for peace in such a manner is ignoring or defying God's plan for the end of the age.
***
It seems clear that dispensationalism is on a roll, that its followers feel they are riding the wave of history into the shore of God's final plan. Why should they climb back into the stands when being on the field of play is so much more fun and apparently so beneficial to the game's outcome? As [one dispensationalist group's] advertisement read, "Don't just read about prophecy when you can be part of it."
ATHEIST WAR HAWKS MANIPULATE BELIEVERS TO BEAT THE DRUMS OF WAR
Leo Strauss is the father of the Neo-Conservative movement, including many leaders of the current administration.
Indeed, many of the main neocon players - including Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Stephen Cambone, Elliot Abrams, and Adam Shulsky - were students of Strauss at the University of Chicago, where he taught for many years.
The people pushing for war against Iran are the same neocons who pushed for war against Iraq. See this and this. (They planned both wars at least 20 years ago.) For example, Shulsky was the director of the Office of Special Plans - the Pentagon unit responsible for selling false intelligence regarding Iraq’s weapons of mass. He is now a member of the equivalent organization targeting Iran: the Iranian Directorate.
Strauss, born in Germany, was an admirer of Nazi philosophers and of Machiavelli. Strauss believed that a stable political order required an external threat and that if an external threat did not exist, one should be manufactured. Specifically, Strauss thought that:
A political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat . . . . Following Machiavelli, he maintained that if no external threat exists then one has to be manufactured
(the quote is by one of Strauss' main biographers).
Indeed, Stauss used the analogy of Gulliver's Travels to show what a Neocon-run society would look like:
"When Lilliput [the town] was on fire, Gulliver urinated over the city, including the palace. In so doing, he saved all of Lilliput from catastrophe, but the Lilliputians were outraged and appalled by such a show of disrespect." (this quote also from the same biographer)
Moreover, Strauss said:
Only a great fool would call the new political science diabolic . . . Nevertheless one may say of it that it fiddles while Rome burns. It is excused by two facts: it does not know that it fiddles, and it does not know that Rome burns.
So Strauss seems to have advocated governments letting terrorizing catastrophes happen on one's own soil to one's own people -- of "pissing" on one's own people, to use his Gulliver's travel analogy. And he advocates that government's should pretend that they did not know about such acts of mayhem: to intentionally "not know" that Rome is burning. He advocates messing with one's own people in order to save them from some "catastophe" (perhaps to justify military efforts to monopolize middle eastern oil to keep it away from our real threat -- an increasingly-powerful China?).
What does this have to do with religion?
Strauss taught that religion should be used as a way to manipulate people to achieve the aims of the leaders. But that the leaders themselves need not believe in religion.
As Wikipedia notes:
In the late 1990s Irving Kristol and other writers in neoconservative magazines began touting anti-Darwinist views, in support of intelligent design. Since these neoconservatives were largely of secular backgrounds, a few commentators have speculated that this – along with support for religion generally – may have been a case of a "noble lie", intended to protect public morality, or even tactical politics, to attract religious supporters.
So is it any surprise that the folks who planned war against Iraq and Iran at least 20 years ago are pushing religious disinformation to stir up the evangelical community?
Conservative Christians were the biggest backers of the Iraq war. And the Neocons are catering to them to try to back them into war with Iran, as well.
I've recently seen a swarm of spam claiming that all Muslims are evil, that they want to take over the world and establish a Muslim caliphate, and that they want to nuke Iran. They misquote Muslims and use false statements to try to stir up religious hatred.
They are simply promoting the Straussian playbook: stir up religious sentiment - even if you are personally an atheist - to create and demonize an "enemy", so as to promote war ...
NOT A PROBLEM WITH A PARTICULAR RELIGION ... BUT OF IMMATURITY
Most Americans confuse Zionism and Judaism. But many devout Jews are against Zionism, and Zionists can be Christian.
And as I've repeatedly noted, fundamentalist Jews, Christians, Muslims and Hindus are all very much alike, and often willing to use violence to spread their ideology ... while more spiritually mature Jews, Christians, Muslims and Hindus are all much more tolerant and peaceful than their evangelical brothers:
As Christian writer and psychiatrist M. Scott Peck explained, there are different stages of spiritual maturity. Fundamentalism – whether it be Muslim, Christian, Jewish or Hindu fundamentalism – is an immature stage of development. There are peaceful, contemplative Muslim sects – think the poet Rumi the poet and Sufis – and violent sects, just as there are contemplative Christian orders and violent Christian groups (and peaceful and violent atheists).
While there are certainly some Arab terrorists, Islam cannot be blamed for their barbaric murderous actions, just as Christianity cannot be blamed for the Norwegian Christian terrorist - Anders Behring Breivik's actions. University of Chicago professor Robert A. Pape – who specializes in international security affairs – points out:
Extensive research into the causes of suicide terrorism proves Islam isn’t to blame — the root of the problem is foreign military occupations.
The 9/11 hijackers used cocaine and drank alcohol, slept with prostitutes and attended strip clubs … but they did not worship at any mosque. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this. So they were not really Muslims.
And even atheists like Stalin can be terrorists, or at least genocidal maniacs.
Indeed, all religions teach compassion, love and the Golden Rule. Likewise, atheism teaches respect for the individual, the most good for the most people, and helping everyone reach their human potential.
Some within each philosophy follow these teachings, and others want to kill everyone who doesn't agree with them. The issue is not really the label of this religion or that, but of maturity and true spirituality and compassion.
Postscript 1: Neoliberals and Neoconservatives are very similar in many ways. And because Neocons are not conservative, nothing in this post is meant to criticize conservatism.
Postscript 2: Most evangelicals are not dispensationalists, and so do not want to bring on armageddon.
»
- advertisements -
Allah is God is Allah ... the God of Abraham from which Christianity, Judaism and Islam flow.
The God of Christianity (New Testament) says that no man can come to him except through Jesus his son. Are you claiming that the God of Islam also says that?
We can only know God through what is written about him. Jewish writing, Christian writing, and Islamic writing all describe different Gods. The differences are in the original definitions contained in the writings - there is no need to pretend people are trying to divide and conquer. The divide is there from the beginning.
RichardP wrote:
In Islam, Jesus is considered to be a messenger of God, as well as the Messiah sent to guide the children of Israel with a new scripture, the Gospel. The belief in Jesus is a requirement of being a Muslim. Jesus is mentioned by name in the Quran more often than Muhammad.
This is not consistent with the claims you've made.
Well, two out of three Abrahamic religions have God (SWT) sans male progeny, into some serious smite, eternal on memory and generally not big on slack when it comes to being worshiped.
Give me slack, or just fucking kill me!
that is not what Jesus taught, which is why fundamentalism gets people in so much trouble. He was a gnostic. gnostics believe that the truth is only available within. not surprisingly, this information has been destroyed and all but erased from history. now people go around beliving such nonsense as "we ca only know God through what is written".... non sense. you will never know God going about it that way, you have it entirely backwards.
... that is not what Jesus taught ...
In the Bible that informs Christian churches, that is exactly what Jesus taught. The Gnostic Jesus does not show up in the Bible that informs Christian churchs - and it is that Bible that was the topic of discussion. That Bible refutes your claim that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all believe in the same God. They do not, as evidenced by my initial question to you.
We know Christ through Word and Sacrament ...
The Sacrament is silent. It teaches us nothing, in the way that the words in the Bible teach us who God is (Old), who Jesus is (New) and our relationship to both. In the context of words being the transmitter of information (which was my point), the Sacrament does not speak words. The Jewish Bible, the Christian Bible (at least the New Testament), and the Islamic Bible all use different words. And each describes a different God, as I stated in my post above.
if you limit yourself to the "official approved" version of the bible (approved by the luciferians in control at the time), then you are pretty much at a dead end.
We know Christ through Word and Sacrament - real flesh and blood, meat and potatoes theology. Not some sissy gnosticism.
yes, Gnostic Jesus is my favourite version - the one who hung out with women and beggars and children, the one who told stories of peaceful existence, the one who spent some time "wandering" and hanging with the Persians, Tibetans, etc.
the vengeful wrath-filled Father figure, not so appealing.
Nothing gnostic about Jesus's promotion of peace and hanging out with the underclass. That's entirely orthodox and Scriptural.
so is his Dad, who most people seem to prefer to worship.
So..... Many "Christians" are working for Satan as secret agents for God. And that they will be forgiven for killing billions, because it was for a good cause. God will come back and say "Thanks for destroying everything, because the whole living in harmony and not killing thing wasn't working out...Welcome to Heaven! Orientation is at noon with your chaperones Stalin and Hitler, keep their questions at a minimum, I am sure they are eager for your knowledge, but we need to stay on schedule".
Why is it that everyone that has "God" speaking to them, assumes it God. It is a friggin faith based religion, any "proof" should be highly suspect, no?Don't you think that the entity Satan (aka The Great Deceiver) could sound like God to a mere mortal if he wanted to? Then one day say, well its only $20 from the collection plate that turns into thousands.
We have not evolved very far from this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOuQPZqcEbk
/end of rant
God does speak, he just never says kill. Well, once he transformed nto Allah, he started to declare Jihad. But up to that point, the 10 commandments reigned. Once Allah came along in the form of Mohamed, all bets were off. you could lie about your beliefs, you can kill those who are different. The Free Will God turned terrorist, i guess. This isn't the Da Vinci Code, however.
God does speak, he just never says kill.
____________________________________________________
Made me laugh. Have you read the new testament?
You skipped the Old Testament, you know, wrath, vengeance, Sodom and Gomorrah, death from above. Hell and high water. Strictly speaking, the New Testament Love God thing is the abberation.
takes some real mental accrobatics to rectify the two (OT/NT) doesn't it? That is a big clue. Most Christians have no idea regarding the true history of the OT, that the stories are far older than even the "hebrew" language... originated in Summaria most likely, and who knows how many times the story has been twisted to serven an end. the "chosen people" myth being the most glaring. now why would anyone want to convince a much larger population that a small subgroup is somehow special according to God, why would that be...
Also Sprach the Ren, "Maybe something bad, maybe something good."
"...I guess we'll never know."
Utter bull shit. Real Christians understand that no one is given that knowledge. Nor can it be "sped up" or accelerated in some way as no one knows the hour. Anything else is anti-Christian substituting the knowledge of man for God.
What you say is true, and yet doesn't change anything.
There are millions of people who consider themselves "real" Christians who believe otherwise.
It all sounds konspiratorial, but this isn't the first place I've heard it. Not by a long shot.
There are millions of people who consider themselves "real" Christians who believe otherwise.
The Bible says that God knew the beginning from the end - before he even created the world. In the Book of Psalms it says that God knows our thoughts before we even speak them. In this context, God knew when he was going to end life as we know it before he even created the world. I would guess that most christians who actually attend church and read the Bible know this.
So - if christians understand that God's plan was laid out before humans were even created, how is it logical that christians would believe that they can influence the second coming of Jesus - part of a plan that was laid out before they were born?
If God knows everything, as the Bible says he does, nothing catches him by surprise. And note that I am not arguing that the Bible is correct. I am arguing that those who believe in the Bible think differently than what is being presented in this article. Ask yourself who you know personally, that is christian by biblical standards, that actually believes they can influence the return of Jesus.
the Church has a lot to answer for ..not just to God either!
Nice article GW. I absolutely agree. For corroborating sources, I would recommend any of the books by Chalmers Johnson such as "Blowback". Or watch the excellent documentary by Eugene Jarecki, "Why We Fight". Or read "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins. I believe that the reason Ron Paul has support from a younger segment of the population is because they get their information primarily from the internet rather than the MSM. I think that for this reason they support Ron Pauls so enthusiastically. I believe Ron Paul in his heart knows he can not win the election, but he can influence policy and that is a start.
May I suggest a nice one, written by an younger "self-hating Jew":
Max Blumenthal - " Republican Gommorah "
____________________________________
( Older "self-hating Jews" r almost gone, Howard Zinn dead, Chomsky to go ... . And yes, I still have my foreskin on .... )
Well, this would take care of the need for contraception.
Flip side is the ayetollah(?) thinks the Mesiah will only come after he blows up Israel.
We're surrounding by fucking idiots.
hey, leave canada out of this!
(despite viceroy harper's intentions :+[ )
Consult a holly prophet Frank Zappa, the last chapter:
"Jesus thinks that you're A jerk"...
Dude -- your tinfoil had slipped a little to the side.... Pls. fix it.
that would be my reaction to if I hadn't already heard/read this stuff a hundred times before from all sorts of different sources.
Sadly, GW is totally correct here.
From Matthew ch 12:
43. When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none. 44. Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished. 45.Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be also unto this wicked generation.
46. While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him. 47. Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee. 48. But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? 49. And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! 50.For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.
This is the Laodicean church age, and men have chosen to trust their lives to doctrine and religion rather than Coming Unto The Father and Trusting God Fully. So many preachers, teachers, ministers have not, as Paul Witnessed they should, "First be Partakers of The Fruits"...
Either you are Of-God or you are not. Most who claim HIM cannot bring themselves to Trust HIM; so very few have elected to Trust God Fully with every aspect of their lives.
All about Knowing HIM and living In-HIS Accord, Being Brother Of-Christ...
Doesn't much matter what men claim. The Whole of Matthew 12 is apt to this topic for Witnessed here is Jesus being accused of serving satan by the pharisses
29. Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house. 30. He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad. 31. Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. 32. And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. 33.Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit
34. O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. 35. A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. 36. But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. 37. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.Your article won't even convience a field mouse.
Would it convience store mice?
Which Obama cabinet members are Neo-Cons? I'm sure Obummer would be offended.
Half of this shit sounds like conspiracy itself.
Thomas Pynchon - The Crying of Lot 49...
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul110.html
I'd also note that most didn't know what a neo-con was before and during GW's reign.
What someone is isn't so much as important as in what they DO. And, clearly, there's little difference with those surrounding Obama as those who were surrounding GW: the results are the same.
Apologies if I missed it, but I haven't seen one single comment address the central point of the article - that atheistic sionists targeted a segment of the American population which identifies itself as Christian to enroll them into helping israel gain influence over America's foreign policy.
If these same Christians knew that the people manipulating them were actually part of a satanic cult of cabbalists operating on behalf of a state dedicated to nothing more than imposing their ascendancy over all other countries and peoples, they might just snap out of it.
But since we're not supposed to talk about who these people are, and what their goals are, it's unlikely folks will find out. Great work here GW - maybe we can look forward to you shedding some more light onto the mission of the dual citizens to attack Christian, Jewish and Muslim religionists and set them against each other.
http://www.archive.org/details/TheSatanicCultThatRulesTheWorld -Rabbi Marvin Antelman on Israel National Radio.
Oh my God! You are SOOO on point! I, regretably, was one of those fooled Christian-neocons until about 5 years ago. I am no longer deceived, and I want to tell every Christian I know that they are willingly and complicity going to participate in their own destruction and that of all other peoples who are not Jewish.
I have learned these things from two very well written and documented books that provide irrefutable evidence that Zionism is EVIL, Tallmudic/Kabbalistic, and determined to rule the non-Jew world under a communist global government run by them.
Modern Judaism is NOT, and I repeat NOT, based on the Torah-Judaism that Moses practiced. It is based on the evil, vile, racist, occult/pagan beliefs and practices that the rabbis brought back from their time of exile. They practice the exact same "religion" as the Pharisees, whom Jesus constantly denounced as a "den of vipers" and "whitewashed sepulchers". They are called the "synagogue of Satan" in the Book of Revelation. And this Talmudic/kabbalistic doctrine is considered more important than the Torah, and is being taught in synagogues and rabbinical schools today.
This book is available at this link complete in PDF form: http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/index.html
The other book which covers the most modern history of the Zionist agenda is by Texe Marrs. Google his name and look for his book called "The Six-Pointed Star....".
"Modern Judaism is NOT, and I repeat NOT, based on the Torah-Judaism that Moses practiced. It is based on the evil, vile, racist, occult/pagan beliefs and practices that the rabbis brought back from their time of exile."
EVERY FUCKING THING IS BASED ON PRIOR "RELIGIOUS" BELIEFS AND PRACTICES!
"Modern" religions overthrew various pagan "cults." They assimilated all kinds of stuff that you're now calling "vile" and "cultish." Look under the hood.
How many fucking virgin births have there been that have launched a new marketing campaign?
Fucking humanity... the religious side is trying to escape the earth via some mythical, never to be seen or proven, entity, and the other side, the "technocratic" godless side, is trying to escape via rocket-ships and stuff. I wish that ALL of YOU would just get the fuck off this planet and let the real people of earth be!
As far as all the "only THE CHOSEN PEOPLE who understand the parables will be saved," what a fucking crock of SHIT! If the message was meant for EVERYONE then it wouldn't have been written in such abstraction. You want to talk cultish?!
This book is available at this link complete in PDF form:
There is a space at the end of your link that makes it not work. I've deleted that space and this link works.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/index.html
Jesusfrickingchrist you are both sooooo right.
Radical zionistas are taking over the world!
Oh it is islam that is largely taking over the world?
Next time go with My Puppy for Mullah.
FYI....I am a Christ-follower, not a Muslim. I am simply not co-opted into the rabid Zionist agenda. Sorry to disappoint you!
My kitten is soft and cuddly.
Meow. Dammit.
Raoul?
George WTF are you talking about? So ironic that you practice what you condemn (I think the word is hipocrisy) by extracting an inflamatory headline from your interpretation of those on the fringe and then applying it to a wider group. Why not extract some quotations from the New Black Panthers or La Raza put your own spin on it and then apply it to the wider African American or Latino communities.
Separately, you make the statement above "Conservative Christians were the biggest backers of the Iraq war. And the Neocons are catering to them to try to back them into war with Iran, as well."
your statement is from this source that states:
Apart from the fact that some 60% of Americans also supported according to the unnamed survey - the survey is not identified and the source of the article is http://www.ips.org/institutional/global-themes/the-worlds-new-superpower... , which is a UN / World Bank backed "Civil Society" NWO pure BS propaganda
GW = spokesman for anti-christians. Go ahead, hammer more nails in the coffin housing our foundations.
He's taken to heart too many listenings to whack-jobs like Hagee. Ignore them.
cabrones gringos marijuanos...acabarán jodiendo el mundo entero
This very subject and the GWB messianic campaign and "clash of civilizations" encouraged me to write this. :
Pech Souleila: Sidi Kafir By Falakpema
I've then written a sequel : Paramour. About the inevitable intolerant "knee-jerked" reaction, after losing Jerusalem, to quelch "the enemy within" : The capture of Constantinople from the Schismatic Greeks and the subsequent tragedy of French civil war against Occitan south, branded as Cathar heretics, upto Montsegur.
Incidently the birth of the Troubadour poetic culture during the Crusades spawned the birth of western romantic woman; Aphrodite's daughter refound, as subsequently celebrated in the Renaissance; Eleanor of Aquitaine, twice queen, being its first icon.
Then, its final sequel "THe last Occitan" about the 7th Crusade and its humiliating end resulting in the emergence of a military nation state in Egypt-Syria under the Mamluks; which will not save the Islamic world from its secular and scientific decline to the benefict of Christian Europe, now rediscovering Aristotle and science.
I learnt a lot by going back into history to discover a period that had never previously interested me. I owe at least that to GWB... Noblesse of bloody Imperator legacy oblige!
Our nation-state and secular oriented West, after convoluting through Reform and Renaissance, never looked back since then to our contemporary times, as beacons of rational human progress : three cultural and political revolutions in Brittain, France and USA. It has through the centuries diluted pre-eminence of Dogma to the benefit of Enlightenment and secular scientific beliefs based on empiricism.
To see the first world now tempted, at the heart of Pax Americana Empire, by religious regression of this magnitude is more than ironic, it is potentially immensly tragic. Worse than a crime, a fault of civilization gone wild, like a stampedng herd heading for the cliff.
A sure sign that the torch will pass to other regions of the world, eastwards and southwards. 1492 cycle then comes to an end, and we may become the new Amerindians, exploited by other Empires!
Don't let the tree of current events hide the forest of a civilization trend...until it's too late. Wake up!