For Republicans Newt Gingrich is the Only Choice

rcwhalen's picture




 
0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 02/05/2012 - 03:18 | 2128107 signalfire
signalfire's picture

 "Gingrich is the author of dozens of books, many of which he actually wrote."

I'm speechless at this.  Was this entire piece written by computer generated phrase software?

Wed, 01/18/2012 - 21:51 | 2076640 DarthVaderMentor
DarthVaderMentor's picture

He's an opportunist, a liar, a womanizer, a fascist, an immoral bankster whore and a power hungry scumbag. 

 

That's all the reasons why I'll vote for him on Saturday.

 

Palin is right. We need to make sure this theater of the absurd doesn't close down too prematurely. The GOP might actually choose a loser rather than the right scumbag to face Obama.

 

A vote for Newt or Paul is a vote to keep this theater open and the GOP needs it open to find a winner and its soul. 

Wed, 01/18/2012 - 19:20 | 2076232 darkhorse222
darkhorse222's picture

Gingrich: is another bought and paid for politician/insider like the rest of them=Romney for instance  thumbs DOWN on him for gawds sakes

Mon, 11/28/2011 - 20:52 | 1923578 ATG
ATG's picture

Teddy, like Hoover, Ike and Lincoln, was a big government progressive.

Since our primary problem is too much government crowding out and killing the economy like a cuckoo bird, we do not need corporate government media whiz Newt Wit in the White House, but Dr Ron Paul, the principled choice of the people

http://www.progressiverepublicans.org/

Mon, 11/28/2011 - 16:47 | 1922605 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Stolen from E. Klein....

"Newt Gingrich is a stupid man's idea of what a smart person sounds like."

 

Thu, 12/08/2011 - 08:02 | 1957767 Taint Boil
Thu, 12/08/2011 - 10:20 | 1958187 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

No, the people that have a faith-based belief in the US fossil fuel prospects are the idiots. He is pandering to them.. He is a misguided hack that should have much have much deeper self-reflection...

Mon, 11/28/2011 - 13:56 | 1921522 iamse7en
iamse7en's picture

Zero Hedge article promoting the New World Order? Hell certainly has freezed over.

Mon, 11/28/2011 - 11:37 | 1920956 Supertubes
Supertubes's picture

This author is completely and totally unqualified to discuss American politics.  I will not explore the loathsome ways of The Newt.  I think it has been handled well here.  Although I do find it interesting that the author introduces us to this great politician by illustrating his first petty takedown.

Theodore Roosevelt is a Jeffersonian or "libertarian"?  Nobody, Court Historian or Revisionist, would describe him that way.  If he was anything he was expressedly for the unrestrained power of the national government, a world view that was anathema to Jeffereson.  Politically educated adults could debate whether Roosevelt was a "national greatness conservative" or a progressive; but nobody with the most rudimentary knowledge of American history would compare him to Thomas Jefferson or even Jackson.  To do so adds nothing to our political understanding as it is so completely off the market and unworthy of debate.

I guess this is what we can expect from a Jack Kemp disciple... libertarian/Jeffersonian indeed.  Hamiltonian power worshipping ass-kisser is more like it, just like Gingrich.

Mon, 11/28/2011 - 03:34 | 1920262 Joy on Maui
Joy on Maui's picture

My very, very high regard for Mr. Whalen was just obliterated and replaced with - WTF?

Always loved his take on what is going on in the banking world - in the world of politics, not so much.

Gingrich?   Really?  "President Newt"?  "President Mitt"?  If I knew nothing about them, I would disqualify them just by their first names.  But, knowing what I know, I suspect neither is capable of beating OBushma, and that is the real concern.

Mon, 11/28/2011 - 02:17 | 1920191 malalingua
malalingua's picture

To put newt in the same sentence as Thomas Jefferson shows how out of touch you are to reality, I seriously thought you were joking and kept looking for the sarc off.

The only conservative running is Ron Paul, he's the only one that has a plan to save this country, newt is a war- mongering despot that has no business running for any sort of office.

Stop listening to that bigoted gourmand on the a.m. radio and turn off fox news and maybe then you can start thinking clearly.

I realize that ignorance and confidence gets you elected these days but the people are waking up, so wake UP!

Mon, 11/28/2011 - 00:11 | 1919989 TrulyStupid
TrulyStupid's picture

T

 

Mon, 11/28/2011 - 00:10 | 1919988 TrulyStupid
TrulyStupid's picture

There are only 2 parties, neo-con and libertarian/Austrian economics.

The former is aggressively pro-war, pro-corruption, monopolistic capitalist, corporate welfare, borrow print and spend.

Every "republican" candidate save RP is the former, along with all the major democrats including Obama... There is no substantive difference between the policies of the neo-con wannabees. Gingrich is firmly in this camp, thoroughly narcisistic and corrupt, another amoral chicken hawk. It is a sad commentary on the general state of Republican political intelligence, that he is considered an intellectual.

And I thought I was Truly Stupid

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 21:30 | 1919505 Libertarian777
Libertarian777's picture

Yes, Newt, the "patriot act doesn't need to be changed" and "we can find a balance between liberty and security {with the scales tilted towards 'security' instead of liberty}". Yes... Newt is the 'only' choice.

 

As Ron Paul said, you can be perfectly safe in a police state... but would you want to be?

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 20:52 | 1919356 godzila
godzila's picture

Gingrich ? Seriously ? If one thing he is just as corrupt and part of the establishement as anyone else. Absolutely zero hope of any kind of progres with someine like him.

To be honest - and it certainly pains me to put it into writting -  the only ray of hope is Dr Paul. The rest of the pack are just blood thirsty, corrupt puppets. Amazing how low US politics has gone.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 20:50 | 1919323 jmc8888
jmc8888's picture

Newt Ginrigch, is almost single handedly responsible for the vitriol we see between the parties, and is the main architect of the policy that both sides of gov't cannot work together.  Gingrich is also a man who spent his time with Monica Lewinsky, a complete non-story, instead of actually focusing on the country.  You want to know why congress doesn't work anymore? You're looking at the man who set that standard, and pushed that train along the tracks. 

He is out of touch.

He is a propagandist.

He is an idiot. (Like a 50 lb overweight guy looks slim situated next 3 sumo wrestler sized people).  He is still an utter imbecile.

He is a fascist.

He is a bankster whore.

He is a hypocrite. (Bill Clinton and Lewinsky pales in comparison to what he did with women...meanwhile he would put himself out as the righteous one). Fannie and Freddie, otherwise known as Wall Street's planned con on Washington via captured idiots....like Newt.

He has no idea of how to do anything.  He has no ideas.  He also is NOT anywhere near the top of his game, more like at the lows....meanwhile the game isn't the 1990's, it's the 2010's.  The game has changed a few times, Newt, has not.

This is just off the top of my head, which is far more than his supporters will ever know, even if they 'follow' him. 

Newt is one of the biggest reasons our country is where it is.  Why he can be the only option for the Republican party, just shows you there is no Republican party, just a bunch of whores aligning themselves to a name, and a bunch of idiots that don't see that.  Newt is capable? Yeah a capable dipshit hack, who is capable of finishing off this country.  But then again, Obama will probably finish it well before anyone would even have the chance to ever vote for Idiot Newt.  The republican party has no standard, evidenced by the fools they have thrown their support behind since well, Nixon?  But for this cycle, we've had the pre-Palin bs, stepford Bachman, Magical Underwear Mitt, Rick 'dumber than W, fascist bankster, student of the economic destroyers' Perry, Herman 'never will be abel to do anything but such Koch' Cain, and now Newt.  Hell I probably forgot about one of their dumbasses rising up in the polls.

I think Ron Paul is an idiot about many things, mostly that he is an Austrian Monetarist, and the positions are then idiotic because of this, but even from the outside, he is their only shot at doing ANYTHING positive.  The rest would be 100 percent failures.  If managed correctly, like a QB that can't throw...handing the ball off every time except for a PA fake a couple of times a game, Ron could do some decent stuff.  But his Austrian monetarism holds him way back, even if it is the same very thing, that has kept him from being a different form of the same bullshit overall sophistry known as monetarism....but in that case Keynesian bullshit.    Ron Paul is a republican's only hope, and even he has some serious flaws.  The republican party is in serious trouble, if they still can't figure out they need to rally around him, especially given the 31 flavors of bullshit they've tried so far and puked up, they are in trouble, and America (because you want legitimate sides) is too (but we already know we are in trouble).

Thanks ZH for the laugh, I love it when ZH gives idiots the forum to help solidify the opposite.  That Newt will never be a good option for anybody to choose, even as a husband.  Let alone as president.

 

Glass-Steagall

Sun, 12/18/2011 - 21:49 | 1992645 DosZap
DosZap's picture

jmc8888

As you have so admirably pointed out his shortcomings, if you tell me your prefer whats THERE to Newt,you are in serious trouble.

As it stands we're knee deep in the  flaming fires of hell,only to get worse.

Way I see it ANYONE but Obama at this point is A#1 with me.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 21:42 | 1919552 ATG
ATG's picture

Austrian Business Credit Cycle one of the few theories providing successful asset management, that does not confuse gold with debt pyramid usury fantasy with the eye of Sauron in Mordor:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_business_cycle_theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sauron#Eye_of_Sauron

 

 

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 20:39 | 1919307 ActionFive
ActionFive's picture

On what merit did this guy zoom up in the polls as of late? Your next TPTB candidate on a plate?  

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 20:31 | 1919250 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

Don't buy into status quo candidate marketing. Register republican and vote for Paul in the primary.

He is not afraid to fight "If anybody dared touch us we could wipe any country off of the face of the earth within hours. And here we are, so intimidated and so insecure and we're acting like such bullies that we have to attack third-world nations that have no military and have no weapons."[17]

From wikipedia: Ronald Reagan spoke in support of Paul's foreign policy views, stating "Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country."[7] Daniel Ellsberg, famous for releasing the Pentagon Papers, has said of Paul: "On foreign policy, on the Constitution, on Homeland Security, on intervention, he speaks very well."[8]

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 21:45 | 1919243 ATG
ATG's picture

RCW, I knew Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul, and NG is no RP.

One is a Constitutional Libertarian and the other was a dethroned hypocrite retail self-serving politician who regularly compromised Conservative Constitutional Libertarian and Moral principles to get ahead.

Even though I spoke with glib opportunist Newt, GOPAC or Grover Norquist several times a week as a candidate in the 1994 Contract with America Elections, endorsed by Dr Paul, there is no way I will vote for bomb thrower finger-pointer Newt Wit, because he cannot beat 0 and would gladly trade our freedoms and taxes for more Lobbying, Military Empire and Police State, more often, in more places at our expense.

Fast and furious perfessor talk is cheap, a dime a dozen in DC.

The only candidate who can actually retire 0 and his gangster government, by appealing to Independents and Conservative Blue Dog Democrats with calm peaceful time-tested principles, is Dr Ron Paul, father of the Tea party.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Dog_Coalition

Dr Paul would be the first practising Physician in the Oval Office, and the only member of Congress elected President with his MD Ophthamologist son serving Jim Bunning's KY seat in the Senate despite Establishment opposition and dirty tricks. Both have excellent long-term vision and bedside manner.

USAF Vet Dr Paul delivered 4000 babies without Abortion or Federal Funding at Taxpayer expense. He survived Twenty-Two Years in a Crooked Congress, including the NG as Speaker of the House, that built a pyramid of deficit debt spending, raided the Social Security Trust and destroyed our American life, liberty and prosperity after we earned and enjoyed them.

Ron Paul is the only person in DC to hit a home run in the Annual DC hardball game, playing in cleats at the tender age of 75:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul

Dr Paul has the third largest campaign chest in a billion dollar election cycle, thanks to mostly small donors under $200, unlike the corporate foundation foreign lobby candidates who bought the Party limelight and got more monopoly media coverage and debate time.

http://www.fec.gov/disclosurep/pnational.do

There is a darn good reason Dr Paul placed near the top of nearly every Internet or Straw Poll, including D strongholds CA and OH, many abruptly cancelled like TX without credible explanation. Dr Paul stands to upset and win primaries and has a good shot at the nomination, unless the voting is fixed. A fired-up grassroots base who vote is the key to winning:

What Tricky Dick called the great silent majority. They are mad as heck at government and candidates as usual. We face an electoral or defacto revolution in 2012 the more Chuckie Schumer denies it on Meet The Press:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45445090/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts/t/mee... 

The Eastern Seaboard DC Wall Street Establishment may well wake up horrified to learn on 7 November 2012 they no longer control the country and the majority of people they sold to the lowest bidder.

To know Dr Paul better is to trust and vote for him to save America by enforcing our Constitution, no matter what corporate monopoly media nattering nabobs would have US believe:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9QzGtARoPs 13:49

Note especially Dr Paul's coup de gras to neoCon Paul Wolfowitz in the audience, who asked a loaded question, by quoting his statement that the reason Terrorists hate US is our military and special ops contractors occupying their homelands (and killing their civilians and children with Langley Tonopah Remote Predator Drones and Depleted Uranium).

The only way Ron Paul and America can lose is if we do not vote.

Wake up and vote or die...

 

 

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:59 | 1919182 cynicalskeptic
cynicalskeptic's picture

Yeah...his 'Contract With America' was broken right off... As if Congress will EVER be subject to the same laws, rules and benefits that the rest of us have to deal with.....

The reality of Gingrich's own life is a horrid example of moral and ethical bankruptcy - sadly all too tyoical of what the Repoublican Party has degenerated to......   Gotta love the 'family values' typoes whose own lives are a mess.   At a point in time when the nbation needs ACCOUNTABILITY for all those that have made such a mess of things, the LAST person you need leading the nation is someone who hasnever been held accountable for his opwn actions.   

The reality is that there isn't one sane Republican candidate (Paul is dead on with some things but off in lala land with others) though with Obama acting like Bush III I don't know why the Republicans WANT to get elected.... they're getting all they want without having to take any blame......   the problem is if this keeps up we'll have rioting in the streets from the jobless and hungry.

 

 

 

 

 

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 20:06 | 1919143 darkhorse222
darkhorse222's picture

WTF?! You respect a guy who preaches "Family Values" who has had several affairs outside of marriage?-Came to his cancer ridden wifes death bed to get her to sign divorce papers! He must have been in a rush-couldnt wait for her to die (How crude)

Then quickly remarried some slut? Who has his hands in more pockets than many democrats-hence his great wealth? Who was caught up in an ethics scandle in congress a few  years back?

NG is not a man-he is in it for himself-hanging out with the big boys-he could give a crap about the country or his constituants, when you look at the man-HE IS NOT OF LEADERSHIP QUALITY

Im voting for RON PAUL-not a man who is part of this corrupt system like Gingrich; Paul is not perfect-but rises far above the heads of any of the other dolts that the GOP is foisting off on the unsuspecting public-

 

edit: now we read of BILL CLINTON singing the praises of the Fig Newton-need anymore proof how the corrupt just love to pat each other on the back?-come-on some of you Republicans must be vomiting at this sick news:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/26/bill_clinton_praises_n...

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:46 | 1919140 darkhorse222
darkhorse222's picture

n/t

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:44 | 1919137 Fozzy Slippers
Fozzy Slippers's picture

It's not your Gov. It's a forgien enemy state. Why are you even voting? Get ready for some real war. The userpation has gone on long enough.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:33 | 1919090 Harry Paratestes
Harry Paratestes's picture

Newt Gingrich really?  you really think so!!?   Who are you fooling?  

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/article/226941/11/Gingrich-Defends-Big-Contracts-with-Fannie-and-Freddie

 

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:36 | 1919087 Henry Hub
Henry Hub's picture

***For Republicans Newt Gingrich is the Only Choice***

Is it possible that Zero Hedge has been secretly bought out by Fox News and Roger Ales is now Tyler Durden!

SAY IT AIN'T SO!!!

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:27 | 1919068 billwilson
billwilson's picture

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

Gingrich?  The man with no morals to try tio get the Conservative Christian vote. HA Ha Ha. Trice married, lying, cheating, asshole (to be kind).

Gingrich? Corruption perosnified. 

Gingrich? Incompetence personified. He had to be thrown out as House leader because he was royally screwing the place up.

Ha Ha Ha Ha

If that is the best the right has to offer, man is America in deep shit.

 

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:42 | 1919128 Totin
Totin's picture

Where you been? The US has been in deep shit for the last three years since the left gave us their best.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:26 | 1919062 Coldfire
Coldfire's picture

A vote for Gingrich is a vote for Obama. Any vote is a vote for farcism. Even RP cannot save the system, it is rotten to the core.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:26 | 1919061 indio007
indio007's picture

Newts Congressional ethics violations will end up in a campaign commmercial and he will be toast.

It seems the lame stream media is just going down the line trying to annoint the "winner". After Newt, will come Huntsman who is palatable to most.

Ron Paul will never get a fair shake even if he won every primary they would say he is unelectable against Obummer.

 

When people say Ron Paul is unelectable they are talking in code. What they are really saying is "Moneyed interests have veto power over who ultimately becomes President".

 

Even if Ron Paul "won" , I sure the ultimate voters (the Electoral College) would vote for someone else in the end.

It's not there just for show after all.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:20 | 1919039 American Sucker
American Sucker's picture

Voting.  LOL.  Why not do a raindance on Election Day instead?

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:19 | 1919035 my puppy for prez
my puppy for prez's picture

THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT NEWT GINGRICH:

"Finally, in order to understand just how dedicated Gingrich is to destroying the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, consider that he described himself as a “conservative futurist” who enthusiastically recommended as Speaker of the House his colleagues read Alvin Toffler’s 1980 book The Third Wave.


In the book, Toffler wrote a letter to America’s “founding parents,” in which he said: “The system of government you fashioned, including the very principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented – a democracy for the 21st century.” According to Toffler, our constitutional system is one that “served us so well for so long, and that now must, in its turn, die and be replaced.”   (excerpt from an infowars.com article which is up today at infowars.com)

It is amazing that this 46 yr. old homemaker/baker can discover more truth about the REAL Gingrich than this hack author!  I am embarrassed for this author's obvious lack of knowledge....reminds me of most retarded Republicans I know....and I used to be one of them!  

Newt is a big, fat liar, a transhumanist, a consummate globalist, and did I mention a big, fat liar?

Our country is in SERIOUS trouble if this author represents even a fraction of the populace!  Geez......

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:09 | 1918976 technovelist
technovelist's picture

The words "libertarian" and "Gingrich" in the same sentence could cause a black hole to swallow up the Earth.

Just sayin...

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:08 | 1918971 victor82
victor82's picture

Dupiicate Post!

Yikes!

What would Ron Jeremy say!

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:06 | 1918970 victor82
victor82's picture

Newt?

Please.

The GOP is pushing the same corporatist toadies and, since they were able to run Palin out of the race, nobody but Ron Paul merits my vote.

I will probably write in Palin as a big "fuck you" to the Bushtard Establishment that still runs the Party. I can't believe that there are people out there who would actually vote for Mitt Romney, btw. The man is beloved by nobody save the State Party Chairs and Georgette Mosbacher and Georgette Mosbacher's jewelry collection.

If you are wonder who Georgetter Mosbacher is, look up in your Funk and Wagnalls under "A Rising Tide Lifts All Yachts". You'll see her picture there.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:02 | 1918950 azzhatter
azzhatter's picture

I'd rather die than vote for that lard ass, scum sucking pig Gingrich.  Ron Paul is the only choice for 2012

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:09 | 1918977 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

A Gingrich presidency would take us to full boil WW3 (we are already on simmer).   The guy is just plain political scum, but you know what they say about shit.  Newt is one of the biggest floaters around.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 18:59 | 1918941 Alvaro de Esteban
Alvaro de Esteban's picture

Don´t know if Krugman is the enemy of the Financial Markets WORKERS, but sure he is more than friendly with Financial Markets OWNERS.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 18:59 | 1918935 Diamond Jim
Diamond Jim's picture

boy, must have touched alot of raw nerves with my post. Guess i was dissed again and had my comments removed by Big Brother. This site must remember our 1st amendment rights and that there is a place in this universe for those not so willing to bow to the altar of Mr. Paul, as so many on this  site now advocate. He is a demogaogue as much as Prez. Owe...who is the real problem. All this comparison of Gingrich to a "nazi" is very reminiscent of Democratic strategies of name calling like "extremist"  "radical" that is now attached to the "Tea Party"etc. I submit that Mr. Paul comes off as too extreme and will not appeal to the masses in "fly over country". True, he speaks the truth and one must admire his nerve and compassion, but he does not strike me as able to work with a Congress, can we say "compromise" boys and girls ?? And as I alluded to earlier, has no foreign policy other than "isolationism".

So diss away you covert democrats and OWS people........this site is not what it used to be....let's see how quickmy comments are purged and discent discouraged.

Sun, 01/08/2012 - 13:54 | 2044320 TrulyStupid
TrulyStupid's picture

Sorry... but there can be no compromise with impending bankruptcy... can't be a little bit solvent (or pregnant).  The deficit must be defeated outright..no prisoners.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:10 | 1918987 Nostradamus
Nostradamus's picture

Uhh, look man, what we have needed for quite some time in America is a president who won't work with congress and won't compromise.  We need a president who will tell the drug addict "no more".  We need a president who will tell the junkie "no compromise" when it comes to him wanting just a little bit, just a teensy weensy more, heroin.  No matter though. The junkie has already OD'd. The fatal dose of that high producing substance called "debt" already coursing through its veins. Ron Paul or no Ron Paul, we won't avoid what's coming down the pike.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 18:48 | 1918909 WatchnSee
WatchnSee's picture

Anybody but Obama!

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:17 | 1919020 Nostradamus
Nostradamus's picture

C'mon man. Don't you remember people said that a long time ago about Al Gore. "Anybody but Gore," they said.  And look what we got. Eight years of the awful big government Republican, G.W. Bush.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 18:47 | 1918908 idele
idele's picture

 Ron Paul has drawn surprising support. A couple of examples of voters under 40 years of age: One of our computer system personnel, has  one child nine months old, voted for Obama, strongly favors Ron Paul. I had a root canal job two weeks ago. The dentist is engaged to be married. He volunteered his concern about the debt problem, and to my surprise, strongly  favored Ron Paul. The question I have about Ron Paul is whether he can handle the politics needed to get passage of his ideas.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 18:36 | 1918877 hardcleareye
hardcleareye's picture

I was getting concerned for Tyler's judgement while reading this POS article. But it is a Sunday night and a little diversion from the eminent eurocalypse is appreciated. 

Looking at the number of votes and rating made me smile!

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:31 | 1919083 slobbermut
slobbermut's picture

Agree....another soft on illegal immigration appeaser, pathetic.  Ron Paul first, then maybe Gingritch.  Newt would do great in debates, smart as a whip, but we need bold leadership who disdains the establishment...that is RP.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 19:31 | 1919082 slobbermut
slobbermut's picture

Agree....another soft on illegal immigration appeaser, pathetic.  Ron Paul first, then maybe Gingritch.  Newt would do great in debates, smart as a whip, but we need bold leadership who disdains the establishment...that is RP.

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 18:26 | 1918849 Zodiac
Zodiac's picture

Ron Paul or None at All

Sun, 11/27/2011 - 18:36 | 1918872 non_anon
non_anon's picture

yeah, I wrote him in in 2008 and looks like the same again!

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!