- advertisements -
There is the just man neglecting his affairs and perhaps suffering other losses, and getting nothing out of the public, because he is just; moreover he is hated by his friends and acquaintance for refusing to serve them in unlawful ways...
But when a man besides taking away the money of the citizens has made slaves of them, then, instead of these names of reproach, he is termed happy and blessed, not only by the citizens but by all who hear of his having achieved the consummation of injustice.
-Plato, The Republic
Econophile - thanks for posting this article. It is well thought out - cheers!
The solution is not Ron Paul. The solution is the massive adoption of green energy, starting with the electrification of vehicles. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrtXXrRa5OI
It really is. Green energy displacing oil will pay ALL of America's debts and bring unheard of prosperity to every single American.
You think maybe you're on the wrong blog with the wrong post, you moron?
cars powered by electricity generated by coal and nuclear power plants, wow, how revolutionary. only way your scenario has any chance of being green (other than the color of our collective skin) is if the next president immediately declassifies all of the original Tesla's notes that the USG stole and releases them in the public domain so all the geeks can start taking a crack at them.
now which one candidate in the field do you think will actually even have an inkling of an intention of actually doing that?
"cars powered by electricity generated by coal"
Watch the video, fool, starting from 7:25 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2FJKY2-E6g where Tesla talks about efficiencies.
I'm appalled that here you are, acting like a beaming light of hope with your gold standard pumping, yet have such a lack of knowledge about electric cars. If you know not what you speak regarding electric cars, you surely don't know much (other than on a superficial level) about gold standards.
dude, please show me one place where i wax (eloquently or otherwise) in favor of a gold standard. as far as Au 'saving the world', there's only one way IMO that it possibly could and it's so far out there that there's never been one discussion anywhere here or any other 'mainstream' website about it, except in jest that 'you can't do it'. i'll leave the rest up to your imagination. now back on topic...
i watched the video and yeah it's "cool" and all that, and maybe a couple years back, i would have agreed with you. but honestly, think this through a minute, if electric cars were THE solution, even with the efficiency gain (which i'm willing to concede is possible), how many more coal & nuclear plants would have to be built? are you willing to put one of those in your neighborhood? without discussing revolutionary efficiencies in electricity generation, you're simply trading one form of energy consumption for another. and where's the lithium for the batteries going to come from? Afghanistan? China? and what's going to power that heavy machinery that will be needed to dig that out of the ground and refine it? just what the earth needs, more strip mining, doesn't seem so "green" to me, now does it?
and what the hell are you going to do with all those internal combustion engines and the vehicles that house them? how many of these do you think exist out there right now? you think 1 billion is off the mark? talk about a "cash for clunkers"...i guess we can just ship those all to the moon and dump them there.
maybe if GM hadn't killed the electric car way back when, this idea may have had a fighting chance to succeed as we could be discussing the inherent problems that electric cars on a mass scale would have created and how to solve them. but we're a little behind the 8 ball at this point don't ya think?
THINK MAN...quit talkin your book and think! if you honestly believe that electric cars are a part of A solution, then more power to ya, i salute people using their noggin instead of constantly preaching doom & gloom. but sorry, THE solution has an intensely vast amount of complex variables that all interrelate with each other on both sides of the equation.
me, i'm a little old school, i happen to think that Henry Ford already solved a large part of the problem back in the 40's without having to put all these vehicles already built and on the road into immediate obsolescence:
too bad it's illegal, which brings us back to RP, doesn't it?
Instead of spending time pumping this bulshivik of a gold standard, you can help reshape America and change the world by pumping and participating in green energy and the mass electrification of vehicles. Go do some deep research, and be openminded like how you want others to be openedminded about your gold-will-save-the-world mission.
How are your chine salad shooters going to make it to Walmart? On an electric train?
Not your father's electric car: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5mhwd1B6h0&feature=related
Certainly not by Ron Paul.
Here is my simple cost analysis http://bit.ly/qATwar
Ron Paul is useless if he can't help electrify our cars.
A Tesla Model S costs as much as to own as a Ford Taurus.
BMW 328 vs Tesla Model S
Let's do the numbers, shall we? According to Edmunds.com, for a 10 year period, the total cost of maintence/repair is actually at least $40,000. It costs about $4 to recharge and run the Tesla for 300 miles ($2 for 150 miles). A full tank of gasoline runs about 250-300 miles. So the energy cost comparison is $4 for Tesla and $50 for gasoline car. I generally fill my current gasoline car about 6 times a month. That's $300 per month, $3600 per year, $36000 for 10 years. That's $72,000 for 20 years.
-BMW 328: $34,000
-gas for 10 years: $36,000 (for 20 years: $72,000)
- maintenance/repair: $40,000 (10 years), $80,000 (20 years)
Total = $110,000 for 10 years, $186,000 for 20 years ownership
Tesla Model S:
- cost: $50,000 ($57,000 minus $7,000 rebate) --- this model runs 160 miles per charge
- electricity for 10 years: no more than $3,000. 20 yrs would cost $6,000
- repair/maintenance: $1000* per year (I feel sorry for the BMW so let's put a number here, though reality is less than this), $12,000 (10 years), $24,000 (20 years)
- quick battery charger for home: $2,000 . $4,000 if replacement after 10 years
- extra battery: $12,000 is bought up front. Note that the latest Panasonic batteries can last 150,000 miles. We add this battery for after the 10th year or 100k-150k miles.--------------------------
Total for Tesla Model S: $67,000 (10 years), $96,000 (for 20 years ownership)
You suckers think that the solution is the gold standard, but it isn't. The solution is the electrification of our cars.
I'd rather electrify trolls...
Ron Paul the next Churchill? Obama the next Roosevelt? Do I hear WWIII brewing?
Strong article. I feel the same way. I feel he is the favorite. I would honestly handicap it this way if I made book in Vegas. The field is so weak too. Plus he doesn't have to put on an act and stay in character like the others do. If he wins the nomination he trounces Obama.
I agree, Gonzo. The talking heads on TV don't get it. Paul is really the only candidate in either party that represents a fundamental shift in how things are done. Were he to win it would signal a revolutionary shift. His support is solid and the middle ground could shift to him. Even some Dems like his libertarian stances.
After getting my IRS audit notice today...I will be sending him money. I am sick and tired of the growing, voracious increasingly autocratic state.
Unfortunately the election is nationwide, not just ZH (although it would be far better that way) ... I don't care what the media says, but unfortunately others do ... RP is my choice but sheeple with not go down that road
But again, any nation that could elect BHO, could do anything!
Damn straight he can win - best example of how scared they are of him - they cancelled the TX straw poll cause there was "not enough interest". Seriously? Not enough interest with two ot the top candidates from TX. Fucking bullshit. They are scared shitless of RP. I know I will do all I can to spread the word and get him elected.
What is this site? I thought it would be about investing and good stocks to find, instead it is nothing but a pitiful political diatribe of mostly right wing whiners decrying that black man in the white house. Where is the beef?
Hey that black man in the white house was pretty big on a company called Solyndra something. You might still be able to buy stock in that if you hurry!
I just don't trust any president with ears that big.
we hate black people.
nothing to do with him being a marxist wannabe
nothing to do with him being an establishment puppet
nothing to do with his crass, offensive, transparent, Chicagoland politics
nothing to do with his terrible policies based on a combination of his complete lack of understanding about the operation of the real world beyond a college lecture hall or community organizer meeting, and the scripts handed to him by his crony corporate/union backers.
yeah, stick with that black thing. that way you don't have to examine your own failed philosophy or admit the disasterous mistake you made putting an inexperienced, naive, ideologue in charge of the most powerful country on earth.
You left out
Nothing to do with him being a blatant liar just like his predecessor.
This coming from a Socialist Democrat:
Obama isn't Marxist. In fact he's hardly even liberal on anything other than social issues. The bank bailouts were started under Bush and continued through his administration. The healthcare bill he passed was originally a Republican plan. He extended the Bush tax cuts. He's bringing us out of Iraq only to shift the troops over to Afghanistan. He's stepped up drone attacks. He's done nothing to prosecute the bankers that are raping this country. He has continuously bowed down and caved to the right wing at almost every opportunity.
Establishment puppet? Our last decent president was Eisenhower. Everyone since has been dog shit.
Chicagoland politics? You mean politics right? Ever hear of someone named Karl Rove?
Inexperienced..Lack of understanding? Let me ask you one question. Did you vote for George Bush? Thought so..
Raciest? Nah I don't think your raciest, just misinformed and blinded by your own ideology. I used to think that Obama could actually be someone that actually gave a shit about working people and helped to bring down the establishment. Then I realized he like all our other politicians only really serves his true masters. The true fascists that actually run this phony democracy. When the people finally wake up from this 50 year slumber and actually decide to take real action against their true oppressors, I'll be ready. Until then, fuck politics and this misinformed belief that we actually choose our leaders.
Although I think "puppet" precludes ideology...
replace with Narcissist, maybe, but as time goes on, I'm leaning more and more towards a downright simple Puppet in action.
He is now not able, even, to muster up the behavior of a Narcissist in the role that he's playing.
He's acting quite exhausted, IMO, and I'd venture a guess that his string-pullers are disappointed in the man (they would not recognize, let alone admit, any culpability in this game).
Can't wait to see what History has to say, but that is corrupt too, so we will likely never know the real scoop.
Even a puppet has certain physical characteristics that dictate what actions it can and cannot perform. and when more than one puppeteer are fighting over the strings, the result is disjointed flailing about.
Obama wanted to be the transformative marxist who brought down America, but he is trapped by having to work within the system, where even coercion and corruption can only take you so far. He also sold himself to so many conflicting groups, all fighting over contradictory goals, he cannot possibly appease one without angering the others. To make matters worse, the policies he's implementing are flat out wrong.
As his ability to hand out favors, and cash, diminishes, so does his usefullness to the TPTB. Meanwhile, everyone is keeping score on his growing list of failed promises, and outright betrayals.
Ok, here we go. Ron Paul on money: awesome. Ron Paul on Foreign policy: suicidal.
How suicidal? Just answer this question: What would a "twelver" do with a nuke?
I rest my case. Get off the Ron Paul wagon. He's right on one thing and one thing only. Granted it is a big thing here on ZH, BUT, millions of people dying as a result of Ron Paul's laisez fair foreign policy?
No thank you. We'll figure out how to straighten this mess out without sacrificing millions of human beings.
Exactly what responsibility does he abdicate that is going to get millions killed? He doesn't advocate unilateral disarmament that I've ever seen. Economics is everything. It is what brought down the USSR and Maoist China without a sot being fired. It is the unifying theory of liberty, prosperity and peace. That's why I enjoy sites like this.
Ron Paul rules and no candidate is without blemishes.
Imagine what you could do with the 100s of billions spent on foreign wars if it was actually directed at stopping nuclear weapons and terrorists in ways that worked. Instead the US makes the world less safe every year.
I imagine you could remove the gasoline tax, and then when the arabs raise prices, in fair and free trade, the net effect to americans would be the same price for gas, and it would not be mixed with american or arab blood.
Sucicidal policy indeed.
Iran would be the one committing suicide, if they were able to develop and stupid enough to try and use a nuke. Israel has over 300 nukes that could turn the entire country of Iran into a giant sheet of glass. So if the "twelvers" want to fast track their meet up with Allah, so be it.
Crazier countries have nukes, see North Korea.
Has anyone got any crisps? I'm starving.
I don't do cheerleading...
but in the context of current politics (I don't do politics either), Ron Paul is an enigma.
If I had a vote that counted -- one vote that actually counted -- I would vote for emotional intelligence of the masses, wherein they would look for, recognize, and understand that the integrity, truthfulness, humility and selfless motivations of our elected leaders is, in fact, the be-all, end-all.
We had a Set of Instructions once -- it was called The Constitution -- are we all such men now that we need no instructions?
If you're a Ron Paul hater, not to worry, no one man will save the day, Ron Paul included.
Congress is corrupt and broken, after all.
If We'd like a chance to attempt to redeem ourselves, however... it's pretty obvious that Ron Paul will do everything he can to nudge us in the Appropriate Direction.
I like the sand dune analogy and maybe if you boil it down, a lot of us voted for change last time and didn't get it. Instead of soup we got dirty dishwater. I believed Obama, but he really wasn't tested before rising to this high office and we were fooled. Ron Paul on the other hand, could probably be in with the in crowd in the GOP if he toned down his rhetoric. He never has to my knowledge, backed off, because this is what he believes in. I disagree with him on social security and a woman's right to an abortion, but I really like the idea of smaller Federal government and greater states rights. On the other hand, I like Bernie Sanders too, and I'll bet both get along on many topics. Both men are men of principle. So maybe this really is a new party emerging. Can you imagine a Paul/Sanders ticket? What a riot!
You fell for Obama's schmooze? How dumb are you?
dig deeper into his abortion stance. Basically, he thinks the states should decide. He will not move to stop abortions as it is no business of the Central Government tp interfere.
Ron Paul is a role model. We need more like this man, not many people at his position live their ideals, vote their ideals, their whole life and political career. This man has not been bought and my hat is off to him, America will eventually take notice because deep down this is what they want and know they need.
was surprised and pleased to see local (tx) news reporting ron paul's lead over perry in the ca straw poll...dr. paul usually gets conspicuously "overlooked"
Perry - 31%
Romney - 24%
Ron Paul - 13%
Bachmann - 5%
Gingrich - 5%
Cain - 5%
Santorum - 2%
Huntsman - 1%
Ron Paul can make life miserable for the Perry and Romney. He's got the FRN's to stay in it for the long term. As others drop out, the media will have to give him recognition.
The powers that be will make everything possible to feed the race with as many clueless candidates as they can until it is too late. Remember Huckabee 2007-08, stayed until the end even though he was out so that Ron Paul would not get exposure nor the anti-McCain votes.
California Straw Poll Yesterday:
Ron Paul- 44%
Romney - 13%
Who's the boss?
Dr. Paul does offer a refreshing view of politics and DC. I guess I am one of the grains of sand that is not in the pile. I think most of America considers him out of the main stream. that said...if you are looking for a "phase change" consider a second Prez Owe term of four years. Of course he will take any victory as a mandate, and he and Queen M will really phase change America. Things are just heating up........
I get your point you didn't deserve the down votes. It's like saying if you want you can brake before the wall, maintain speed or increase speed. Maintaining the status quo is clearly flooring the accelerator.
It's hard to tell if the idea that Ron Paul cannot win in 2012 is more ignorant, in its complete lack of historical sophistication, or more arrogant...
It's hard to tell if the idea that Ron Paul cannot win in 2012 is more ignorant, in its complete lack of historical sophistication, or more arrogant...
Regretfully, of course he can't win in 2012. He doesn't cater to the mainstream middle (which is a plus to his supporters), his base is fringe (in a healthy sort of way), his foreign policy opinions are.... unique, his domestic opinions are.... foreign, he's in his 70s.... I could go on. The bottomline is that he scares the hell out of most folk.
I'm a fan or Paul, a fellow Texan, and will gladly vote for the man in a primary (as a protest vote). I give him credit on (certain) economic issues. But we're talking about the Presidency here, not Lecturer Emeritus at the student union.
Perhaps this means that the youth that seem to be his base have figured out that the LAST guy they supported was a party charlatan.
P.S. I regret that the Republicans do not seem to have a viable alternative.
I disagree. It is the middle that is responding to Paul- they are tired of the wars, tired of the taxes, tired of the TSA and EPA and IRS, tired of the constant lies, tired of the inflation- and they are starting to see that Dr Paul just MIGHT have a solution. They've tried Clinton, then Bu$h, then Obama...and they've all promised the moon and delivered nothing.
Why is it that the moral character of America has fallen so low?? All this whining about he cant win is pathetic... Do you think the people with washington fighting the british had this same defeatist attitude ? Do you think they were always giving up because apparently they could not win ?? THey showed resilience , courage and determination. Americans are now shadows of their former selves.
It's the same thing that makes American Idol and Dancing with the Stars hit TV show, and Oprah a billionaire. The failure of American education is not just low test scores. Sad state of affairs.
I continue to try and convince republican friends of mine one at a time to support Ron Paul (and it takes a long time), but it's the only way to do it. It's like "prepping" for an uncertain future, you either get it, or you don't.
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.