This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Should Politicians Wear Uniforms Like NASCAR Racers?

George Washington's picture




 
wtjET Should Politicians Wear Uniforms Like NASCAR Racers?

Source: Good.is.

I call on artists to make Nascar jerseys for all of the D.C.
politicians, Democrats and Republicans alike, who are – with a few
exceptions – bought and paid for. For example, Obama has raised more money from Wall Street than anyone else.

You can find all of the information you need here and here.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sat, 10/08/2011 - 00:46 | 1752200 chindit13
chindit13's picture

Realistically, this can be accomplished in the internet age.  Require all elected officials to post their daily schedule on their website.  If they meet with someone, list the name, the actual time spent together, and note how much in contributions the politician has received from that individual or from groups sponsored by that individual.  Make the politicians naked before the electorate.

Any politician who claims that would be an invasion of privacy (like the Patriot Act that he passed?), can choose not to become a "public servant".

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 00:43 | 1752196 Penniless Pauper
Penniless Pauper's picture

Yes.  Also the bigger the sponsor the bigger the patch!!

 

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 00:27 | 1752177 Lmo Mutton
Lmo Mutton's picture

Hey we could get China to make us some of those dolls that....

OK. Not a good idea.  Nevermind.

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 00:16 | 1752159 ac3
ac3's picture

This is brilliant.....make it happen

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 00:08 | 1752151 bill1102inf
bill1102inf's picture

A ball gag, a barrel, and the fucking gimp.

 

Im going to need a pair of pliers .. and a blow torch, and thats just to start.

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 00:14 | 1752156 knukles
knukles's picture

 

Butch: You okay?
Marsellus: Naw man. I'm pretty fuckin' far from okay.
Butch: What now?
Marsellus: What now? Let me tell you what now. I'ma call a coupla hard, pipe-hittin' niggers, who'll go to work on the homes here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch. You hear me talkin', hillbilly boy? I ain't through with you by a damn sight. I'ma get medieval on your ass.
Butch: I meant what now between me and you?
Marsellus: Oh, that what now. I tell you what now between me and you. There is no me and you. Not no more.

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 00:06 | 1752149 zombiebank
zombiebank's picture

Great idea!!! I would also propose have
Ing a national referendum on the ballot for term limits. "serving" the "public" should not be a career.

Also, since the super supreme pan court decided that corporations are people, I think the republicans should form a corporation made up of a board of directors Herman Cain, Ron Paul, Mit Romney and Rick Perry. Run the corporation for president and show just how stupid this court decisionc was.

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 00:00 | 1752135 DarthVaderMentor
DarthVaderMentor's picture

Love it GW. They should be forced to were their advertisers ike this before every political speech and public appearance.

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 23:50 | 1752118 anonnn
anonnn's picture

The simplest test whether a male is a robot:

Is he wearing a tie?

For a female, I have yet no like test. 

 

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 09:55 | 1752670 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

there is a test...but it's EXPERITMENTAL. Here's the video i got of it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndnd-ERnWew&feature=player_detailpage

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 09:10 | 1752581 SuperRay
SuperRay's picture

is she a blond tv newscaster? (news being used loosely here)

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 23:58 | 1752134 DarthVaderMentor
DarthVaderMentor's picture

The test for a female or a gay male is "is she wwearing a tampon up her orifice?"

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 23:23 | 1752080 poorgman
Fri, 10/07/2011 - 22:35 | 1752009 XitSam
XitSam's picture

The politicians would exempt themselves from the law the same way they exempt themselves from the Do Not Call list.

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 00:18 | 1752165 knukles
knukles's picture

Would?  Would?
Have I been fucking missing something?

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 22:11 | 1751943 the grateful un...
the grateful unemployed's picture

brilliant!!!!

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 22:40 | 1751921 Lucius Corneliu...
Lucius Cornelius Sulla's picture

Awesome idea!

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 21:53 | 1751878 nmewn
nmewn's picture

Three piece suits colored red by the blood of the workers and producers of this nation would be more fitting...but the point is well taken here...

Obama has raised more money from Wall Street than anyone else.

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 04:21 | 1752373 Praetor
Praetor's picture

Why not just have all politicians sponsored by Target?

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 08:02 | 1752504 nmewn
nmewn's picture

First laugh of the day!

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 21:42 | 1751847 Earl of Chiswick
Earl of Chiswick's picture

GW you'd do a lot better if you had Boner justaposed with Barney - the risk is that by showing boner only some might think you lean a certain way if you know what I mean

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 09:58 | 1752677 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

actually he'd do better if he asked who doesn't contribute at all.

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 22:51 | 1752027 George Washington
George Washington's picture

Yes, if I had created the image, I would have at one Dem and one Repub ...

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 21:22 | 1751798 George Washington
George Washington's picture

Paging William Banzai ...

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 21:44 | 1751855 Earl of Chiswick
Earl of Chiswick's picture

GW bAD form to take the first position in your own post but because you reference  ZH's resident Michelangelo you are forgiven

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 22:28 | 1751992 runlevel
runlevel's picture

imagine if GW had said "FIRST" .. could you imagine????

Fri, 10/07/2011 - 22:22 | 1751978 12ToothAssassin
12ToothAssassin's picture

How do I write a law to get this on the ballot in CA to make politicians wear logos from the companies they accept contributions??? THIS IS THE BEST IDEA IVE HEARD YET.

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 00:19 | 1752168 Cynical Sidney
Cynical Sidney's picture

in a capitalist society it's next to impossible to end the influence of money in politics. this article proposes a great idea to mitigate such influences, and i have a similar idea: to anonymize political donations, to allow people and entities to make contributions to any politician and whatever cause they choose, but mask the identify of the donors so that the politicians wouldn't know who's bankrolling them.

 

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 08:18 | 1752519 Crash N. Burn
Crash N. Burn's picture

"in a capitalist society it's next to impossible to end the influence of money in politics" and yet Dylan Ratigan suggests to the 99%, we should treat all politicians as we would NCAA atheletes - you take money, you're done.

http://worldwideponzicollapse.blogspot.com/2011/10/dylan-ratigan-at-occu...

Perhaps the problem is not one of who does the bankrolling, it is the size of the bankroll required. Campaign spending limits?

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 10:02 | 1752609 Bob
Bob's picture

Ratigan's plan works for me.  He's looking for a constitutional ammendment.  If we can pass them for tiny minded shit like prohibition of alcohol, surely we can do it to make real our purported democracy. 

Get the money out.  Period.  If they take a free trip, a gold watch or keychain, or even share a desert using an extra spoon: Lock 'em up.

This ain't hard and it ain't complicated. 

Sign his petition--if tens of millions of people are on board by next election, they will have to address it.

Or demonstrate that we don't have a representative government. 

Nearly everybody in this country agrees on the problem and there is one obvious solution: Get the fucking money out

http://www.getmoneyout.com/

http://www.dylanratigan.com/

Sat, 10/08/2011 - 04:48 | 1752386 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Just wondering: can the anonymizer be bought out? Hard to think that such vital information would not have a price in this US driven world.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!