This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
These People Are All CRAZY ... (Aren't They?)
Well, since you looked, here's some more information.
»
- advertisements -
Contact Information:
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Suggested Reading:
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
It would be very wise of you to study our disclaimer, our privacy policy and our (non)policy on conflicts / full disclosure. Here's our Cookie Policy.
Yes...elites. These elites have spoken from their own mouths (even W) what their goal is: a New World Order, global government, or whatever you want to call it. It's not conspiracy THEORY....it is conspiracy TRUTH. It is all out in the open if people will take the time to search for it. But the average American is too distracted, dumbed down, and naively trusting. I know, b/c I used to be that way. Two good sites that will introduce people to the concept of the NWO are:
nwosurvivalguide.com
infowars.com
It is hard to swallow at first....it makes one so disillusioned and sad to realize that those that run America have nefarious intentions. But it IS true.
building 7 tenants:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/background/tenants.htmla
da link don't work
flaccid link, definitely not erecti.
Edit : My bad! I back tracked and it worked. The list checks. I knew a guy from AMEX who told me his office was in N°7. I see this is true. That day he was out of the office. Lucky for him. His buddies had the shock of the lives. I don't know if anybody died in N°7 during the events.
Backspace over the last "a", dumbass.. JW was right.. You are fucking stupid..
i am leaving my home forever.
interesting video by doctor Helen Caldicott.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XT6ZCxzW8K4
hmmm, why does she say it is a good idea to leave western canada? hmmmm......
Since I've learned about Caldicott due to Fukashima, I'm convinced she's one of the world's great people. And I'm something of a misogynist, so that's saying a lot!
It's getting to the point that we only have choices which revolve around varying degrees of fucked. Do you want to be fucked in Fukushima, less fucked in Canada.......but still fucked, or fucked somewhere else. Perhaps you would prefer to be politically fucked. Maybe financially fucked. Agriculturally fucked? How about religiously fucked? Ethnically? Physically? Unlawfully? It's a long list, but with time and effort, I'm sure you'll find the fucking that's right for you.
"More than any time in history mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness, the other to total extinction. Let us pray that we have the wisdom to choose correctly." - Woody Allen
concur, we seem to be fucked in multiorfices no matter which way we turn.
You sir, speak the truth.
Thank you for saying how I feel.
bravo, well said
Who? Why??
sunny
"Listen to 'experts'" all speaking ... slowly .. as ... to ... a .. child.
Ed Asner is enough of a reason to ignore the entire business as claptrap.
Ahhh it's our friendly neighbourhood alphabet troll. Pushing the propaganda for the corrupt man. Well done Steve from Langley. Could you do me a favor and look over your cubicle? Is HITMAN56 not at the office anymore, or do the agent provocateurs work in a different location? Haven't seen him on here anymore after I called him out for trying to incite someone to "pop" Timmay...
How did you become a troller? Did you originally want to be a field agent, but got caught in bed with the director's son? Just curious. Have fun continuing to shovel shit against the tide, fuckwad.
Accessory after the fact to the murder of 3,000 Americans, mom would be so proud of you!
You take the blue pill - the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill - you stay in Wonderland ...
Ah, another handy excuse to ignore reality! Gravity doesn't exist; but if it doesn't, then how could you be so stupid if not for being dropped on your head after birth?
Yeah, and how's the gold shorting coming Steve? Your wornout deflation Prechterite bullshit gets old on that topic too...
adhominem bullshit. you are a fucking idiot. where's ther junk button Tyler. No excuses
Stevie!...
Stevie!!...
Stevie Virginie!!!
Now... Listen ... !
Stop... drooling ... all ... over ...your ... keyboard ...!
Slobber ... will... ruin ... it ... !!!
Yes, yes. the buildings were prewired as part of an emergency management plan.
In cold war days, hundreds of West German infrastructure targets, such as bridges and tunnels, were kept in a state of pre-demolition, in case of a Soviet overrun. Structures that millions used on a daily basis, for decades, completely unaware that they could be demolished within an hour of the order being given. Considering the high profile nature of the WTC complex, it would make complete sense to be prepared for the need to take the buildings down in a controlled fashion.
the real questions are:
was a scenerio created to intentionally trigger the management plan?
if so, was it a false flag, ie use of actual government agents, or an act of willfully allowing a known terrorist act to take place?
a first step of forcing the gov to admit what was done would then shine light unto who would have been aware of the contingency and seek to exploit it, thereby providing a list of suspects to investigate.
This will never happen. Someone reading from a script gave an order. An order that may have been necessary, but one that could never be justified to a large segment of society. It is a shame, because in the course of concealing such an controversial option, the truth behind the worst case a terrorism in the world may be being concealed as well.
My guess is the 2 towers were not imploded, but collapsed as a result of the planes flying in to them Now, people can argue if that was allowed to happen, blah, blah blah. 8 years ago I would have said no fucking way. After learning much more about what goes on in DC and how these scumbag politicians operate, I'm not so convinced it wasn't allowed to happen.
But I agree with your premise that at least WTC7 was pre-wired for demolition, probably at the time it was built. If they decided to make use of that at the time of 911, my guess is they did it to hide some evidence or secrets of some sort or another - perhaps even totally unrelated to the attack, but something they feared would be exposed.. Would another investigation actually be able to find out what it was that had to be destroyed? I think not. TPTB have a vast array of monetary, political, military, and media resources to guarantee that will never happen.
<remove tinfoil hat>
WT7 housed the following agencies (besides businesses): IRS Regional Council, US Secret Service, CIA, SEC, Mayor's Office of Emergency Mgmt. Here is a cut and paste from wt7.net:
"One of the most interesting tenants was then-Mayor Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management, and its emergency command center on the 23rd floor. This floor received 15 million dollars worth of renovations, including independent and secure air and water supplies, and bullet and bomb resistant windows designed to withstand 200 MPH winds. 2 The 1993 bombing must have been part of the rationale for the command center, which overlooked the Twin Towers, a prime terrorist target.
How curious that on the day of the attack, Guiliani and his entourage set up shop in a different headquarters, abandoning the special bunker designed precisely for such an event." 3
Speaks for itself, doesn't it?
We should look to understand the physics before attempting to figure motives or who did it. All three buildings exhibited free-fall collapse, which can ONLY occur by forces removing resistance from below what we see as airplane impact zones (and fires).
The hypothesis of pre-wired buildings during initial construction phase should be testable. Seems that there would be MANY folks in the construction industry noting this, design/construction plans containing actual info/documentation. I have no opinion, as this is one step removed from having people admit that the offical story is false and that a new thorough scientific investigation be conducted. Such a thorough investigation would likely raise such a question.
Watch videos of all 3 falling and think about it.
I watched the 2 towers for hours that morning. Honestly, I don't recall a lot being said about WTC7 at the time, though assuming the videos we're seeing haven't been doctored or sped up or whatever, that sure does look like a planned demolition. Cleaner than many professionally done ones in fact.
Be sure to LISTEN as well, for sound provides lots of clues as well. Even the initial commentaries speak of the destruction as being like that of controlled demolition: I challenge anyone to find a similar description being given to buildings engulfed by fires.
It's "possible" that images were doctored, but try to concentrate on the basics. There is absolutely no alterations of the shot of the North tower's antenna falling: it's a hallmark image. I've always thought of this as a key reference/focal point. Bodies in motion tend to stay in (same) motion until acted upon by some other force. Why didn't the upper part of the building continue to fall OVER? This was it's initial projection. That mass had a lot of desire to continue, yet it "corrected." Altering/arresting its motion away from that projection could only happen by removing more resistance from the opposite direction, from toward the center of the building.
specifically, watch this presentation by gage on the two towers.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQgVCj7q49o
When you read more about the twins you will understand the planes could not have brought them down.
The twins were designed to withstand planes flying into them... when you understand this about the twins and add wtc-7 you have traveled some distance down the rabbit hole Neo.
But remember... when you learn more it will change you and there is no going back. I actually believe ignorance is bliss.
"The twins were designed to withstand planes flying into them."
Regardless, there's the issue of free-fall speed. There are some folks out there suggesting that the towers were, in fact, poorly constructed (Port Authority being the "mob" and not abiding by actual building codes and or using proper materials or, it WAS brought down by fire because environmentalists stopped further additions of asbestos during construction, blah blah blah). Concentrating on just the physics angle of attainging free-fall speed keeps out of the "poor construction" trap.
LOL - yes it is. Ever notice the eyes glaze over and deparate attempts to change the subject when you try to talk about this stuff with people that don't know, or more accurately, don't want to know whats going on around their little space of existence? Those that pay little attention to what's going on in this country and the world do seem to be a generally happy lot though.......
why, oh why did I take the red pill?. . . .
Because you're a survivor, have a survivor mind?
The truth lives. Lies die... (though they often take nearly forever to do so)
AJEnglish Opinion: "Forget bulls or bears, the US economy is a world of sharks deeply in need of shrinks," says Danny Schechter-
BRAVO GeoW. !!!
Ya got Brass Balls to keep hammering home the truth to the many 9/11MORONs... such as Smokey(Jim)Quinn... who post their trite economic articles while disparaging the scientific facts explaining WTC7.
Keep up the great work!
i am no 9-11 conspiracy nut. i believe the cia wired the building they were based in ....
building number 7 was 100% a controlled demolition i've been telling people this for years.
the other two not as certain. building 7 , there is no question.
Of course the other two towers were part of the same stage play! There is no question.
Building 7 was supposed to be hit by the "terrorists" of Flight 93, but it was way off course and mistakenly shot down over Pennsylvania by an overzealous USAF pilot who didn't get the memo (or maybe it was shot down because it was way off course and way behind schedule). With the thermite already melting supports in Building 7 in preparation for the intended plane strike, they had no choice but to let it continue, then trigger the final explosions that caused the weakened building to free-fall.
There were exactly the same reports of molten steel and explosions in the lower floors of towers 1 & 2 in videos and audios withheld from the 9-11 Commission by NIST, but released under court order just a few months ago.
It was mined - I was there, it smoldered for months - nothing but thermite or serious explosives could have boiled the steel.
I watched a youtube video sometime ago where Silverstein was interviewed and he said that they had to bring the building down as it was unstable. I guess he had also informed the insurance before hand.
I have an open mind here, but there may have been enough time to rig the explosives and BBC and oithers had been informed in advance. Someone out there may have watched that same video. I think it may be this one.
http://www.infowars.com/print/Sept11/pp_fdny.htm
That is curious. However, it does not fit with the theory that it was prewired. Unless the theory goes way beyond the obvious, but to destroy evidence of financial wrong doing, removed gold from the basement just before the attack, an excuse for the collapsing economy, and keep the ailing industrial complex afloat by the wars to come.
Do you want revenge? Bring the system down slowly and steadily with no shots fired. We need a reset fast.
Keep buying physical gold and silver (even though there will be a smackdown next week.) Stop buying i-stuff and things you don't need, hug your kids and make love to your spouses, work hard and keep a low profile.
"I have an open mind here, but there may have been enough time to rig the explosives and BBC and oithers had been informed in advance."
Are you suggesting that WTC7 was wired That day, or previously?
I've run across people suggesting a day-of, and in response to worry about damage from an organic collapse.
With fires burning I'd hardly think that a day-of wiring job could have taken place- circumstances were too uncontrollable.
Silverstein has replied back that he was saying to pull the fire crew, not the building. Not that I trust him or rely on anything that he has to say in order to evaluate HOW the WTC7 came down.
One day wiring would have been nearly impossible, and if undertaken, very obvious to anyone near the building. You don't get that kind of matreriale and engineering know how together with the snap of a finger. In a word, ridiculous.
Well, yes, I KNOW that: I went head to head with a popular "intelligent?" poster on Roubini's site a long time ago and pounded him into the ground on this point (it's amazing how poor people's thinking skills can unfold when they're engulfed in something from an emotional angle). I was asking this of the person above, asking for clarification on what they meant by stating that the building was wired.
Yup. Residual heat doesn't keep steel molten under a pile of rubble for a month (after pouring millions of gallons of water on it) without some sort of oxidizer.
I guess our engineering schools will be shut down next, and all practicing engineers hunted down.
NIST's role to insure weights and measures was destroyed during the Clinton admin. They have all the credibility he had when he had to explain his thermal expansion.
They are not crazy ...just reality and science based professionals....oh wait basing facts on science IS crazy, my bad....
Next they'll be promoting "evolution" or something like that!
No, no, no, GW. You've got it all wrong. NIST claims that the never before observed “new phenomenon” of “thermal expansion” was to blame for the destruction of the building. NIST says "the collapse of WTC 7 is the first known instance of a tall building brought down primarily by uncontrolled fires."
First time ever. New phenomenon. Nothing to see here. Move along! NOBODY could have known it was going to come down, because it was the first time EVER for a tall building to come down due to fire.
LOL.
"Symmetry is the smoking gun." And then WTC7 is the smoking gun. For what? That's a rabbit hole Americans just don't want to go down.
well, the whole presentation falls down when he starts with "Architects and Engineers build to withstand Earthquakes etc"
let's face it - Fukishima showed us that things built to withstand less than what could happen only in our nightmares ultimately encounter
our nightmares
Fukashima baby
glowing in the night
please baby don't say maybe
'cause i love that you're so bright
http://thepeakoilpoet.blogspot.com/2011/08/fukashima-baby.html
well, the whole presentation falls down when he starts with "Architects and Engineers build to withstand Earthquakes etc"
So, let's just use this to avoid the REAL discussion, that of the fact that the buildings were brought down with explosives.
What construction methods were used STILL doesn't influence the profile of how the buildings came down. Hell, they could just as well have been constructed out of cardboard, as cardboard would still be subject to the same laws of physics as was the concrete and steel.
The issue of attaining free-fall speed is all that needs to be brought up. And we know that free-fall speed CANNOT occur without the removal of resistance from below the impact point. Whether the building is designed to withstand no earthquakes or a level 100 earthquake doesn't matter!
Actually buildings are engineered to withstand earthquakes. Research buildings in Japan and California. Which is why when quakes happen the damage is less. I suggest reading more at the ae911truth.org site and you will have your answers. These people are not whack jobs, just professionals across the world that know their stuff and are unhappy with the lies and coverup. You might be too if you lost a love one on 9-11 or had professional experience on topic.