This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Payrolls 'Miss' In September On Average
We've discused how to forecast it, how to trade it, and its politicial implications, so just to tie it all up in a bow, here are the 'surprise' factors for September's NFP over the last 14 years - mostly a miss!
And for those curious what the average seasonal adjustment per month has been in the past decade, here is the answer:
(h/t @Not_Jim_Cramer)
- 7227 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -




Silver is up.
You know that part right before the head exploded?
Silver has to crash fist to take out the stops, and then it's up. Oh look - there is goes now.
Dammit......so close.
Upward revision of August numbers + seasonal (election year) adjustments = better than expected
Toldcha :D
It's bizarre to watch the "countdown" and "the number that could make or break the election".
So, 80,000 to 115,000 people are going to determine the election?
C'mon, it sucks, unemployment is ove 15%, and we hang on monthly numbers?
A joke.
It's election year, so following the statistics it's a 95% chance to miss expectations.
R you f..ging serious? I think an ant crawled across the screen?
You have to be kidding. Unemployment down to 7.8%...only to be revised after the election. Someone tell me the labor force participation rate...please.
Damn Ministry of Truth. It seemed inevitable after Obama failing to show for the Tuesday debate. Lying bastards....
for the hundreth time. as far as trading. totally irrelevant.
I remember Ms Expectations. She was really hot, but she was just a tease.
Forget Main Street - it's all about maintaining the Sesame Street Sheeples now
It's ain't about the jobs....it's the incomes, stupid.
Part time workforce went from 8 million to 8.6 million (which could explain huge household survey gain and UE drop).
Bogus Employment Report: +114k snipLook what we have here!
This is rather amusing; +114,000 is fewer than the working-age population growth in the household survey (206,000) and yet unemployment decreased.
Huh?
The household survey's unadjusted numbers, however, show some rather interesting figures, none of which make sense. "Not in labor force" increased by 386,000 while "employed" increased by 775,000 a net change off "unemployed and looking" of well north of a million people!
But -- giving up is not the same thing as finding a job.
much more at link