This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Super-Power Showdown - US vs. China

Tyler Durden's picture




 

These giants boast the world's largest economies and active militaries with their decisions influencing politics at a global level. Despite a massive trade agreement and many diplomatic meetings, the two nations struggle to maintain the semblance of a civil relationship. As pressure mounts from US leaders, China remains unfazed, coolly growing its military and economy. Master-of-Finance-Degrees provides the ultimate infographic of how these two titans of industry and power measure up when pitted head-to-head. Guess who wins?

 

U.S. vs China: Superpower Showdown

Source: Master of Finance Degrees

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:41 | 2902785 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

Education begins in the home.

As China gets more T.V.'s and Internet devices (computer, tablet, phone) and the Women start divorcing the Men for money and play time you can expect their education rating to start crashing to U.S. levels.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:54 | 2902976 knukles
knukles's picture

Brilliant!

They shall rise to our level of exceptionalism.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:43 | 2902786 5551212
5551212's picture

How does US have the edge in military supremacy?

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:52 | 2902816 AllThatGlitters
AllThatGlitters's picture

US Hardware trumps Chinese bodies I assume is the reason.  The fact that nothing in the infographic alludes to this makes it a pretty silly infographic.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:14 | 2902870 dick cheneys ghost
dick cheneys ghost's picture

Take away our petrodollar and reserve currency status and then tell me how we stack up...

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:40 | 2902940 Jack Burton
Jack Burton's picture

Bingo ghost! Absolute bingo! You take away the petro dollar and it's reserve currency status and the USA collapses in minutes! Only our ability to print dollars to infinity and have them accepted by all the producer nations around the world keeps the USA in power.

Imagine when the dollar is not accepted for the massof goods and services that pour from around the world into America in exchange for printed green toilet paper. It is game over, for good! All that would be left would be for America to expend it's inventory of weapons, troops and ammunition in stock on one last giant killing spree on those who have refused the dollar. After the initial burst of invasions, bombings and killings the US runs out of money and that is that!

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:49 | 2902959 Manthong
Manthong's picture

Don't forget about the aircraft carriers and the stealth drones..

In the end, that will make the difference in a toe-to-toe, but then the asymmetrical thing comes into play.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:11 | 2903267 Vlad Tepid
Vlad Tepid's picture

The stealth drones that Iran spotted, commandeered, and safely landed?

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:17 | 2903274 nmewn
nmewn's picture

I'm wantin me some a dat techie...ya know, just in case I need to commandeer a drone sometime.

Hey!...I paid for it ;-)

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:44 | 2903308 Vlad Tepid
Vlad Tepid's picture

In two totally unrelated stories, the Department of Homeland Security annound they'dbe releasing tens of thousands of drones over US territory and I will be taking computer programming courses in Farsi.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 03:25 | 2903617 Hobbleknee
Hobbleknee's picture

Na, I think he meant the stealth drones that would be nuked at sea before they even got off the carrier.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:51 | 2902790 Zero Govt
Zero Govt's picture

Don't even think it ...we're all fed up with the Fed owning 60% of all US Treasuries. If the economic retards buy the other 40% (because China offloads) won't that make the Licensee, the Fed. owner of the Licensor, the US Govt, all be a bit insestuous???

talk about conflict of interest when CONgress comes round to renew the private cartel monopoly on money license

We the bankrupt US Congress, indebted to the Fed, hereby grant to our owners, the Fed, a new license after a free, open and transparent bidding and tendering mechanism

Brilliant

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:52 | 2902815 Kayman
Kayman's picture

Brilliant indeed.

Perhaps they'll develop a false flag operation, by catching Bernanke wacking off in the excecutive washroom.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:56 | 2902824 Zero Govt
Zero Govt's picture

Berwanke can be caught whacking off with his Ivy League dorm mates, and it still won't matter ...the Fed has CONgress by the balls, the Fed owns the US Govt and all the gibbering public representatives (cough) therein

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:52 | 2902798 falak pema
falak pema's picture

this is like the comparison of universities, no perception of where the leading edge lies and where the downside abides.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:44 | 2902953 CloseToTheEdge
CloseToTheEdge's picture

 

“Everyone looks retarded once you set your mind to it.”

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:58 | 2902984 ParkAveFlasher
ParkAveFlasher's picture

China totally kills us in violin geeks per capita and in total.  This chart is BULLSHIT.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:45 | 2903092 Beam Me Up Scotty
Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

And ping pong.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:34 | 2903185 Wakanda
Wakanda's picture

Piano geeks too.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:08 | 2902810 Insideher Trading
Insideher Trading's picture

Despite a massive trade agreement and mainly diplomatic meetings, the two nations struggle to maintain the semblance of a civil relationship.

Sounds like a typical American marriage.

There's a 50% chance this relationship ends with irreconciable differences.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:56 | 2902825 SubjectivObject
SubjectivObject's picture

US can have all the other numbers, but it cain't fix stupid.

Final Score: China Won, US Ohnos

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:13 | 2902827 WhiteNight123129
WhiteNight123129's picture

Guys have you noticed that the margin requirements have been decreased for all currencies except the Israeli Shekel which had an increase?

Have noticed the increase in margin in tanker rates??

Have you noticed that Mitt Romney is leading in Gallup Polls?

 

Tonkin bay

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:57 | 2902829 malikai
malikai's picture

So China beats on practically every point on economy, yet the US has the edge in economy? What?

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:21 | 2902885 The Shootist
The Shootist's picture

Same with the military. They say china has more troops (and I think their number of about 2 million is way short) but give the U.S. the edge? Yeah, we might have the edge, but you've got to show number of nukes, naval vessels, missiles and aircraft.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:35 | 2902922 ersatzteil
ersatzteil's picture

Not to mention equipment maintenance and reliability. Factor out the F-22 unless you want them dropping out of the sky enroute with pilots blacked out from hypoxia. Factor in China's recent purchase of Sovremeny-class missile destroyers from Russia; a three-ship delivery which caused quite a power imbalance with the world's largets carrier force.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:36 | 2902925 Dr Benway
Dr Benway's picture

Yeah I didn't get those two things either?

 

Pretty sloppy infographic, not as striking as the demonocracy ones that are posted here regularly.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:57 | 2902832 Tango in the Blight
Tango in the Blight's picture

As a Dutchman I can understand the American's situation. At one point we had the world's most powerful navy (mid 17th century), half a century later we were a second rate power. And now we don't matter much anymore.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:20 | 2902881 shovelhead
shovelhead's picture

Cheer up Bunky...

The Dutch are still #1 in cannabis seed sales.

(Watch out for Californians though...they're sneaky.)

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:43 | 2902946 Tango in the Blight
Tango in the Blight's picture

Thanks to the "weed pass" which our nanny state government introduced Cali will soon be the cannabis kings.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/04/dutch-weed-pass-stoner-voters-n...

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:57 | 2903330 Hi Ho Silver
Hi Ho Silver's picture

So now all you have to look forward to is sharia law. Condolences.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 03:17 | 2903607 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

I don't know, you've got some fantastic Women and cheese.

Those two and a good bottle of red wine...

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:57 | 2902833 JustObserving
JustObserving's picture

US military spending is listed as 4.06% of GDP.  It is actually about a trillion dollars.  It is 6.5% of the GDP.   That is a very large error - so the credibility of the comparison is questionable.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/02/the-real-defense-budget/253327/

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:58 | 2902834 MikeMcGspot
MikeMcGspot's picture

For those who enjoy zesty predictive fiction, I recommend a 5 part fiction series by John Michael Greer, he issued part 3 today so there is more to come. Well aligned with the title of this post, you will have to scroll down about half way to pick up part 1.

http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/

 

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:39 | 2902933 Ignatius
Ignatius's picture

Greer is not stupid, but he's got his meme (peak oil) and he can't see outside it.

Post a positive comment on gold and watch what happens (remember to duck). 

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 16:39 | 2905415 Matt
Matt's picture

With a good editor, this guy might give Tom Clancy a run for his money.

$7 / gallon gas, 20 years from now, with more bailouts, QE and Peak Oil? 

Let's see, over the last 20 years gasoline is up about 200%. If there were sustained shortages plus more money printing, I could see $20 per gaollon being a more reasonable price 20 years from now.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 18:59 | 2902838 kalasend
kalasend's picture

China #1 on math, science and reading _internationally ranked_?? Total BS.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:00 | 2902840 insanelysane
insanelysane's picture

In China the gov controls the media and just prints complete fiction.  Here in the US it is completely diff.........oh never mind.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:02 | 2902844 q99x2
q99x2's picture

Those F'n nukes go off buddy and the cockroaches will be the winners.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:08 | 2902857 kalasend
kalasend's picture

One thing that none of these US-vs-China discussion would ever explore is the fact that, if you offer a Chinese such option as a US passport, he/she would say yes without hesitation and at no delay. So there is no such thing as strong Chinese nation vs USA, there is only a question of how much border you can open up to absorb useful labor.

But then, no politician would dare going there. Hell, even posting this message is going to earn me some thumb-downs for sure. Pathetic.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:29 | 2902906 Mr. Hudson
Mr. Hudson's picture

What you say is true. I am in association with many Chinese students from the mainland and most of them want to live here and work. If they can't work here, they want to go to Canada; but they don't want to go back to China.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:14 | 2902867 schadenfreude
schadenfreude's picture

Total BS and wasted time to read. Comparison of statstics on high aggregation from economies that manipualte every fucking outcome is absurd. 

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:21 | 2902880 Boilermaker
Boilermaker's picture

13% poverty in CHINA?!??

AHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA, AHAHAHAHAA,....oh shit, I just sharted and blew beer out of my nose.

AHAHAHAHAHHHAHHA

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:27 | 2902900 Spastica Rex
Spastica Rex's picture

Gini coeficient

The truth hurts. Or is simply laughed at.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:41 | 2902923 Boilermaker
Boilermaker's picture

AHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH!!!!

BWWAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!

That's good stuff, I don't care who you are!

Population below poverty line: 13.4%
note: in 2011, China set a new poverty line at RMB 2300 (approximately US $363; this new standard is significantly higher than the line set in 2009, and as a result, 128 million Chinese are now considered below the poverty line (2011)

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:47 | 2902954 Spastica Rex
Spastica Rex's picture

Another funny thing is how great China does in education. If their kids are so smart, how come they work in Foxconn sweatshops?

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:31 | 2902913 zerotohero
zerotohero's picture

Honey Boo Boo says FUCK YOU CHINA

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:52 | 2902971 zerotohero
zerotohero's picture

Honey Boo Boo says FUCK YOU DOWN ARROWS

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:00 | 2902991 Ness.
Ness.'s picture

Love me some "sketti"... extree butta momma.

 

 

Back to reality.  All is lost.  Algos will go bidless and the reset/war begins.

 

 

 

 

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:06 | 2903248 Cosimo de Medici
Cosimo de Medici's picture

I have no idea what a Honey Boo Boo is.  I know I could Google it, but I fear an episode of projectile vomiting if I do so.  It took me a few years to summon up the stomach for finding out what a Snooki is, though I still have no idea what the source of her fame might be (I suspect it is some reality TV show or maybe she is a friend of that big butt California sex tape queen).

Anyway, the question is...is a Honey Boo Boo something from which the US can benefit as a cultural export, letting the outside world know who and what we really are as a people?  Does China have a Honey Boo Boo, or is there a Boo Boo Gap?

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 02:36 | 2903576 OldPhart
OldPhart's picture

We appear to have the same taste in programming and projectile vomiting.  Unfortunately was made acquaintance with Ms Honey Boo Boo while walking through the living room on my way to the shitter.

Homey Boo Boo is Snookie (which I happened to encounter another fine evening on my constitutional through the living room.) twenty years earlier.  Whatever the show is appears to mix poor white trash with pedophiles in displays of their less than five year old children.  It is profoundly disturbing just to hear as background noise.

Apparently our programmers have selected HBB to represent the end times.  It is horrifying to even glance at.  I think it's actually mind programming, I hear the same pulsing volume that I'm starting to notice more and more in popular music.

For a visual, think of Shirley Temple, with an extra fifty pounds at age three or four, a smart ass idiotic mouth with a backwoods hill-billy accent accompanied by a monstrously huge mother who apparently makes her living by pimping out her baby.

Everytime I walk past the TV with that kid on I'm reminded why I basically stopped watching two years ago.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 07:13 | 2903719 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

are you in fucking jail or married??   not sure which would be harder to switch the damn channel

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:32 | 2902915 besnook
besnook's picture

i think this same chart was posted in the london times in 1937 comparing the usa and the british empire.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:37 | 2902927 magpie
magpie's picture

Woah there, someone forgot our new Nobel Peace Prize winning Superpower.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:38 | 2902934 Mr. Hudson
Mr. Hudson's picture

The Chinese military are better fit. Their soldiers are selected only if they are in excellent physical shape and are above average in intelligence. There is a waiting list of young Chinese wanting to be in the military. Our military takes just about anybody. I knew a girl that enlisted here in America because a judge gave her the choice of either joining the military or doing time in prison. She was a 5th grade dropout and gave one fourth of the men in Wyoming venereal disease; including her brother. In the military she slept with any guy and girl she could and got higher than kite every night. Now, she is a decorated officer. Go figure.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:17 | 2903032 lolmao500
lolmao500's picture

Epic!

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:29 | 2903057 blunderdog
blunderdog's picture

   Our military takes just about anybody.

Well, OK, but the selection pool is only from those unfortunate enough to have felt the need or desire to enlist, so it's much more exclusive than you imply.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:29 | 2903174 hawk nation
hawk nation's picture

Decorated with what?

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 23:29 | 2903377 Jam Akin
Jam Akin's picture

Don't ask.  Don't tell.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 03:22 | 2903611 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

"I'm a Yankee Noodles Nancy!"

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:39 | 2902935 besnook
besnook's picture

200 million chinese troops walking west with pitch forks would be hard to stop even with nukes. the chinese would win that war and cure their population problem for a while. once the indians see how effective the straegy was they would engage the chinese and it could only be hoped that the conflict was broadcasted worldwide.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:17 | 2903031 Ness.
Ness.'s picture

Agree.  USA lists 75mm available men 16-49 vs China 385mm.  As an avid Risk player.. I'll take the troop avantage.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 23:12 | 2903356 Jam Akin
Jam Akin's picture

Let's not forget the 700 million rounds of ammo that DHS is laying in for a rainy day now.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 01:19 | 2903510 GoinFawr
GoinFawr's picture

What's the shelf life of that kit?

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 02:40 | 2903582 OldPhart
OldPhart's picture

I'm not sure, but we've been firing WWII 30.06 here since the 70's.  Dad somehow got hold of a truckload of shells.  So far we haven't had but a couple that didn't fire.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 13:12 | 2904667 Jam Akin
Jam Akin's picture

Decades is indeed the correct answer.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 03:25 | 2903616 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

Next World War will not be boots on the ground, or even boats, tanks, or planes in the sky but nukes from space.

Whoever blinks loses if the planet doesn't lose first.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:45 | 2902952 tip e. canoe
tip e. canoe's picture

 Guess who wins?

nature

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 19:52 | 2902970 yogibear
yogibear's picture

Even though the Chinese make less many of their people believe in saving 50%. Many Americans are lucky to save 6%. Chinese have a manufacturing economy whereas the US believes in services ("May I take your order please", "I'm going to sue you for everything you have!") and paper shuffling (financials).

China is extremely patient. China will just enable the US to dig a deeper and deeper debt hole (With the help of people of people like Krugman and Burnanke). Like the former Soviet Union it will no longer be able to afford it's debts and print it's way out.

China can win without firing a shot. It can wait it out and watch the US decline. China has already taken key technologies. Aviation is the next strategic industry to dominate.

 

 

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:03 | 2903005 Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill's picture

Don't think that wait is going to be long.

Another 24 months at this rate, and its stick a fork in it time.

The Chinese ,and Russians will own the world without firing a shot if we are lucky.

Don't see Uncle Sam going quietly into the night though.A lot of kicking and warring first,

prolly with nukes, if we are unlucky.

Exit stage left Pax Americana either way, maybe homo sapiens also.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:08 | 2903010 optimator
optimator's picture

Careful comparing military spending.  Much of ours is for the pay our forces get.  I don't know what the ChicComs military pay is, but I'd guess its not very much.

Any war would find our Naval and Airforce an easy walk over the Chinese military, and if it went nuclear they'd be signing the death warrant for their Chinese future.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:54 | 2903109 saints51
saints51's picture

The death warrant would be for humanity. You think one or 2 nukes will fly? It would be the true endgame. Everybody goes poof.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:50 | 2903315 optimator
optimator's picture

Notsofast, saints.  Chinese have 26 ICBM, I can't remember how many thousands we have.  Old Chinese proverb say, "Better to lose face than to lose a**.  And always remember, the one thing worse than a nuclear war is losing a nuclear war.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 23:08 | 2903351 saints51
saints51's picture

I agree we have an arsenal of weapons that cant be matched. My point is when one madman presses the red button so do the others. I see a nuke war like a chain reaction where allies defend allies. imo, everybody loses a nuke war because the planet is FUBAR for lifetimes. Again we have an arsenal that can destroy the world a 1000 times but whats the point of having that. I guess its a big dick competition.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:11 | 2903021 fireburn999
fireburn999's picture

Education does not take into account how many elite academic institutions in the US at the forefront of pioneering technologies like quantum computing, genetics sequencing, laser warfare, material science, green grid tech, ect. I do understand the US is completely saturated with horrible universities that do nothing for the economy but generate debt; we do edge out China in education for now due to high end tech research.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:22 | 2903278 Vlad Tepid
Vlad Tepid's picture

All those "elite institutions" are teaching Chinese (and Indian) wunderkinds.  Hardly a paleface or roundeye to be seen.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 01:18 | 2903509 Angus McHugepenis
Angus McHugepenis's picture

Vlad - Perhaps...

fireburn999: Biography
Physics graduate student.
Member: 6 weeks, 6 days (missing the last 6 for all three)?
Or just invert the 999.
Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:16 | 2903030 cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture

 

Sun is setting on America, rising on China, regardless of what these "charts" say.

 

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 23:13 | 2903357 BeerBrewer09
BeerBrewer09's picture

I miss the old avatar =-(

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:23 | 2903042 1100-TACTICAL-12
1100-TACTICAL-12's picture

Could we have not let the bears do the Bernak on this .it's late in the evening & readeing small print with one eye closed is difficult. long Canadian Mist....

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:26 | 2903050 Jacks Cold Sweat
Jacks Cold Sweat's picture

China has better numbers than USA how come she loses? Does the infographic imply that USA have more advanced technology than China?

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:31 | 2903060 blunderdog
blunderdog's picture

It's 'cause it's printed in 'Merkin.

The Chineezy version has it going the other way.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:55 | 2903325 optimator
optimator's picture

He forgot a few U.S. numbers, and letters,  that put us ahead.   B2, FA18, F-16, F-22, B1B, B-52, F-15, M1A1, CVE, the list is quite a bit longer, but you get my drift.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 03:28 | 2903618 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

You have to read it left to right.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:44 | 2903089 chump666
chump666's picture

0033 GMT [Dow Jones] Although destocking activities dragged down China's 3Q12 GDP growth, stronger-than-expected September macro indicators suggest that the recovery has started

hahahaha

yeah right NASDAQ is 3% neg on the month as China turns into stagflation nightmare.

 

 

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 20:51 | 2903105 saints51
saints51's picture

China does not have to fire one bullet to beat the USA. All China has to do is remove the US dollar from being pegged to oil. War is so out of style. Its like bell bottom jeans.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:26 | 2903168 hawk nation
hawk nation's picture

This is the cheapest way to win and provides the most benefit to china

How many military personnel will continue to do their job when the dollar does not buy them anything?

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:20 | 2903271 saints51
saints51's picture

Exactly. This is the point when the American people imo will see the true colors of the puppet masters. It will show USA as the true aggressor and the propaganda machine will not be able to make shit stick against the wall. At least this is what I would hope the outcome would be for the blind.

 

As for military troops, I honestly think you would still have some fighting for the elite even without pay. If the elite provides them 3 hot meals and a place to lay their head, they will die for it. Got to remember some people are so brainwashed.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:07 | 2903135 Redstone
Redstone's picture

The arguments raised that compare China and the U.S. as approaching parity are detrimental. Why?
First, the intent of these arguments is to support the build-up of America’s military/industrial complex, a banker goal.
Second, they give credence to a Communist form of government as being capable of  growing entrepreneurial capitalism in much the same way as the West has experienced industrial revolutions -- a banker goal.
Third, the argument masks the real reason that China is showing industrial and technical growth; mainly, that U.S. patents, technology and technical jobs have been stolen from the U.S. by the multinational corporations and bankers and given by the  U.S. to China -- a banker goal.
Fourth, propaganda building up the success of the Chinese economy, said to rival America’s economy, is meant to show the failures and weaknesses in the American system and prepare Americans to accept a place in line of world governed economies -- a banker goal for world socialism.
With these banker goals, it’s easy to see why one would use the obviously contorted U.S. data and compare it with likely completely fabricated Chinese data,

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:11 | 2903139 morpheus000
morpheus000's picture

competition in fraud as they say

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:13 | 2903143 JLee2027
JLee2027's picture

China has no chance, sorry. After the collapse, the US will recover faster. We don't need China, but they need us.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:18 | 2903151 lolmao500
lolmao500's picture

After the collapse, a dictatorship works better than a democracy.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:49 | 2903216 JLee2027
JLee2027's picture

That has nothing to do with what I said.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:30 | 2903287 Vlad Tepid
Vlad Tepid's picture

Why will the US recover faster?  That's complete baloney.  The infographic notwithstanding, 75% of China's population currently live in conditions worse than what most Americans can imagine a collapse scenario would look like.  When any collapse happens, China will go right on trucking and America will grasp it's collective forehead as the double macchiato high wears off, tapping their non-responsive iJunk in catatonic repetion, and then proceed to go post-Katrina, bath salts crazy on each other as they fight for the last gigabyte of data on Kim Kardashian.  If you question my logic, check with Dmitry Orlov.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:30 | 2903176 morpheus000
morpheus000's picture

you wont recover...Americans are a dieing people...

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:33 | 2903291 saints51
saints51's picture

Jlee I like a lot of your comments but this one i disagree with. To think China needs us is not accurate imo. Do not underestimate China as they have more power than most think. China can hurt us way more than we can hurt them. They are already trying to remove the US dollar being pegged as the reserve for oil. That would destroy the USA overnight if they can pull it off. Plus they can hurt us more and stretch us thin by fucking with Japan which is happening now. USA must answer to Japan's call since we are allies. The USA policies and games they have played for years has put China in perfect position for check mate. China has more to gain than lose while USA can lose it all and gain nothing but more debt.  China knows its the underdog yet the USA is up only by 1 and China has the ball late in the 4th quarter.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:25 | 2903149 AgShaman
AgShaman's picture

It sure will be grand....when everybody from the age of 18 and 25 can do three months of basic training...and be ready to serve against the Chinese bogeyman

"Press Freedom".....10th?

hahahahahahahahahaha

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:33 | 2903182 morpheus000
morpheus000's picture

Wow US education stats are really sad...

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:31 | 2903290 Vlad Tepid
Vlad Tepid's picture

Take out the word "stats" and you've got it totally figured out.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 01:00 | 2903487 Angus McHugepenis
Angus McHugepenis's picture

Nice catch there Vlad.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:40 | 2903195 OutLookingIn
OutLookingIn's picture

Meaningless.

Complete waste of time.

Data sets on both sides are complete bullshit!

What matters most? Who owns the factorys? Who is the debtor? Who is the creditor?

Who could afford to lose half a million people and still win an armed conflict?

Who plans generations ahead and who plans until the next election?

Now, ask yourself - who has the edge?  

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 00:56 | 2903481 Angus McHugepenis
Angus McHugepenis's picture

To add to your post:

What matters most? Who owns the factorys? Who is the debtor? Who is the creditor?

The BIG question should be; Where did the money first come from to build the factory?

I would build TEN fucking factorys starting tomorrow if I could print unlimited fiat for me and my buddies on the expectation that the sheeple will continue to trust me and my fiat (not the car), because I’m doing God’s Work.

We will always be fucked six ways to Sunday while we let Bankassholesters and Politiciancraps control the money.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 21:55 | 2903227 hawk nation
hawk nation's picture

After the election and obama looses i can see a scenario where they tighten margin requirements, stop QE infinity and limit the entitlement programs to cause economic collapse and the need for martial law due to all the social unrest from people starving

This should keep obama in office and create the need for a permenent police state 

 

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:06 | 2903256 orangegeek
orangegeek's picture

Capitalists 3, Communists 2.

 

Sounds like cold war spin all over again.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:18 | 2903273 tickhound
tickhound's picture

Awww look at the colors and the chart graph showdown, so kewl.  Anyone here seen zerohedge?  I was looking for zerohedge.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:30 | 2903289 JLee2027
JLee2027's picture

In the 70's it was the Soviet Union. Oops, all gone. In the 1980's and 90's it was Japan was going to take over the world. No more. Now it's China. Great, except two problems. 

1) China must import food. How can you be the greatest in the world if you can't feed yourself? Get real.

2) If you haven't noticed, the leaders of the planet since Roman times have been Christian nations. I do not believe this is a coincidence. China is not a Christian nation, therefore world leadership won't be permitted to happen. 

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:39 | 2903302 Vlad Tepid
Vlad Tepid's picture

1)  Buy it/take it from those weaker/poorer than yourself.  Tell me,wise one, do you "import" any of your food?  Or do you grow it and slaughter it all by yourself.  For all of history, more powerful nations have imported food - going back to the Romans you cite.  But then based on #2, you don't seem to know much about history.

2)How about:  the Norse, the Mongols, the Byzantine-defeating Ottomans, the various Chinese dynasties from the Han to the Ming, the Abbasid Caliphate, the Mamelukes...I'm getting tired of typing here, but your point is totally invalid, and I'm not even including the Nazis and the Soviet Union, but that's just because I'm a nice guy.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 01:41 | 2903528 JLee2027
JLee2027's picture

1) Does America need to import food? No. My point stands. China needs us, we don't need them.

2) You mention empires and raiders, but not world leaders. I guess you missed my point there too. The ones you mention were just historical noise, not leaders.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 22:53 | 2903321 reader2010
reader2010's picture

One important factor not disclosed is that China runs short of pussies. And that's a huge problem.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 01:30 | 2903354 Jugdish
Jugdish's picture

That's true but they could always invade those little places around them thailand, Loas, Myanmar, Nepal, and steal their women. Also, we also have to contend with the black factor. 17% (of total pop) of the most worthless group of people residing on the planet - the American Africans. Sorry, I'm partially racist and I live in the south.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 00:34 | 2903450 Angus McHugepenis
Angus McHugepenis's picture

That is exactly what my McHugepenis Chart has been tracking.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 23:01 | 2903336 beatus12
beatus12's picture

Daring some folks on this site. How about make the

plea to help instead of us all just complaining. What

about getting off our complacency and really begin

again. And I mean again. I'm just old enough to

remember how proud and grateful my parents

generation were to have good manufacturing jobs

working for companies owned and created by daring

people on this side of the world. Guess what I'm

starting a company, an industrial business because

I'm more than worried for the next generation. If

you think things are bad now wait until the dementia

demographic really begins to take hold. I ask anyone

out there that cares about  America to get

out of your comfort zone and take a chance to start

new enterprises. It's the only way I can envisage a brighter

future for the younger people of N. America.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 23:17 | 2903365 Manipuflation
Manipuflation's picture

OK, what the hell...

"How about make the plea to help instead of us all just complaining."  What plea are you referring to?

"What about getting off our complacency and really begin again."  Who is complacent and in what manner are they complacent?  Respectfully Sir, please describe the 'begin again' and detail a plan to achieve it.

"Guess what I'm starting a company, an industrial business because I'm more than worried for the next generation. If you think things are bad now wait until the dementia demographic really begins to take hold."  +1 Sir.  I believe it could be effectively argued than many of us here are of a unique aggregate.

 

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 11:54 | 2904378 beatus12
beatus12's picture

Ok Manipuflation. Plan to get some, if only a small fraction,

of the idle manufacturing centres re-opened. Use the new

financing centre in the midwest opening specifically for

the purpose of new industry with all the support services

that go along with it. I'm getting someone to put

up a website with lot of links and hopefully inspiring

stories and massive focus on how important fabrication

is to our economies. David Rosenburg says housing

2pc, manufacturing 10. And if people say nay, I say

hogwash. Despite all the bad news we have folks

trying - 500,000 new companies have been started

by individuals. Think of the ripple effect if we could

get that number doubled or trebled. One industrial

association website I visited last year, stated that

over 450 small enterprises were involved to fabricate

all the parts for a finished energy product. Hugh.

Would like to hear your ideas.

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 23:21 | 2903372 Nadaclue
Nadaclue's picture

Zerohedegers have ruled that this chart is, complete bullshit.

I don't know who dreamed up this crap but they have a liberal streak. It's not total horseshit but coimes close to the 50/50 barrier.

Z H's have spoken with the II vote.

That is all...

Thu, 10/18/2012 - 23:45 | 2903391 Manipuflation
Manipuflation's picture

Agreed on the BS part.  I have done my due diligence but can really only come up with the following as to who dreamed this 'something' up.  Please correct me if I have missed something obvious.

http://www.masteroffinance.org/about/

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 04:37 | 2903658 onebir
onebir's picture

1 here :p

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 00:10 | 2903418 Manic by Proxy
Manic by Proxy's picture

They hate us for our Freedom Fries

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 00:22 | 2903428 TomGa
TomGa's picture

Stopped reading at China  9.28% GDP growth. LOL.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 00:24 | 2903429 Mr_Wonderful
Mr_Wonderful's picture

Adult literacy in the U.S. is 99%? Yeah right.

 

 

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 04:36 | 2903657 onebir
onebir's picture

Also the Chinese international subject rankings are probably nonsense. Chinese kids do work (very) hard in high school, & are good at maths and science, but from what I can make out when they do these international comparison tests, the students are cherry picked from the best of the best students in Shanghai. (ie near genius kids drawn from a 1.4bn population via scholarships etc to the top high schools in big cities.). I think most other countries just submit a random sample of their students...

Tai ai mianzi de guojia.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 00:55 | 2903480 Gulfcoastcommentary
Gulfcoastcommentary's picture

This isn't bad, but I wrote a blog that examines even more fundamental issues. It's called "Foundations of Civilization, What about China?"   http://gulfcoastcommentary.blogspot.com/2012/01/foundations-of-civilizat...

China has miles to go to beat the USA in fundamental foundations of lasting, modern civilization.  I would rate China a "fail".   I believe China is a very unstable country and is in no way the "heir apparent" to becoming a dominant power.  

Let me know what you think.  

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 02:58 | 2903591 jfal014
jfal014's picture

 

Mostly agree BUT major errors on two counts:

1) economic data incomplete

            a) Gold reserves (if accurate) 

                        US = 8134 tones

                        China = 1054

            b) Most tradable coin

                        US = petrodollar/& 63% of world trade = hegemony

                        China = Largest US gov bond holder/ this makes the US their asset! Clever, given pointing a gun at your fund manager would mean your asset is cancelled. At least a cool 3T taken off the debt load.

                        China fix their coin = 'print' to maintain tight rate

            c) larger middle class goes to US, self explanatory.

 

2) military force! Grossly underestimates US

            a)  a number army is an ancient strategy

            b) modern strategies all go to the US: in fact the latest stuff is US IP.

                        i) nuclear weapons; may be 5,000 (the smallest are more than 2,000 times more powerful than those used in Japan - 1945); may be 2,000 are 'ready-to-go' from various underground/space locations from well controlled rockets;

                        ii) air/naval forces: the largest and fastest fleets, and most well trained personal all goes to the US;

                        - 11 CVNs (nuclear powered water fortresses) deployment of over 200 fully loaded fighter jets (of which there are almost 3,500 different aircraft); carriers travel with 2 warships, up to 2 submarines                        (of which there are almost 400), amphibious crafts, etc.;

                        - foot soldiers are well trained and well equipped, the latest guns/communications network;

            c) international space station; mainly a US venture, possibly largely linked to military forces. This is a possible weakness that China targets, not specifically the space station but the thousands of satellites swimming   around in space; the US has several strategies for this and some.

Overall score = 5/0

China would cause the US some trouble no doubt, but not a long-term problem, at least not yet. Give it another 50 years, if they (China) can survive the next 10 years.

 

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 08:53 | 2903872 GoingLoonie
GoingLoonie's picture

I suggest you read the book, One Second After.   This is the WW III we will see if Civil War does not erupt first.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 02:55 | 2903596 Geruda
Geruda's picture

The chart that is not showing is how many fat peoples each nation is having.  The numbers showing peoples would be having more equalness if the numbers were showing peoples by weight and not showing peoples by numbers.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 03:31 | 2903621 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

How states that those departments should weigh the same?

When you preside over the biggest extortion of the weak, farming of the poor scheme in human history, the military department outweighs all the others.

Guess what, 'americans' know this and well, the US of A has supreme advance.

As a reminder, if technological advancmeent was enough to win a war, Germany would have won WW2.

China is lagging way too much in the extorting/farming side on a global scale to perform anything challenging to the 'american' imperium of Man over sub humans and non humans.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 03:38 | 2903629 ZFiNX
ZFiNX's picture

Look at those two flags. I see more similarity than difference.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 06:50 | 2903701 lakecity55
lakecity55's picture

Choomboy chooses the one on the right.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 03:39 | 2903630 ZFiNX
ZFiNX's picture

Look at them!

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 07:49 | 2903763 negative rates
negative rates's picture

Cool link, I heard that civil war in turkey will start if a war between syria and turkey begins which now is all but a certainy. Kick um when they are up, kick um when they are down.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 13:07 | 2904638 e-recep
e-recep's picture

a job of banker backed separatists.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 06:59 | 2903703 Arthur Borges
Arthur Borges's picture

The title of this article highlights the difference of mindsets between the two countries. The Chinese mindset avoids "showdowns" at all costs -- it's just seen as necessarily mutually destructive and wasteful, and therefore stupid and hugely embarrassing for everybody concerned. The pan-Asian mindset model is the yin/yang circle that symbolizes the struggle for balance in all relations concerning everything from husband & wife to sun, earth and moon.

Why is it so hard for the Western mindset to think outside the model of Good vs. Evil with the as-yet undelivered promise of the ultimate triumph of Good in a world where Good is born of Evil and Evil, of Good? If you need an example, China has the richest rainbow of cuisines because of a history of natural and manmade disasters that forced people to try cooking anything that looked alive and to figure out how to make it palatable. Alternatively, Chernobyl and Fukushima would have been impossible without the sublimely creative thinking of Einstein, Fermi and Heisenberg, among others.

The universe is just energies in constant movement. Nothing is created or destroyed. There is only movement and transformation. No single energy will triumph over the other. Why remain prisoner of the idea that one will ultimately triumph?

"Showdown"? Hmm...

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 19:23 | 2905737 Matt
Matt's picture

For all that, the Chinese seem to be pretty wound-up over those little islands and the anniversary of Nanking, and seem to be looking for a showdown.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 07:04 | 2903709 Arthur Borges
Arthur Borges's picture

Another weird thing: How come the US death rate is 8.39% and the Chinese rate is 7.17%? Does that mean people in the overdeveloped USA die younger than in the underdeveloped PRC?

And how come those two figures are not presented side-by-side for easiest comparison like for the other data?

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 07:20 | 2903726 e-recep
e-recep's picture

china is stealing american jobs in broad day light and no one can stop it. what the fuck would china need a war for? it's already winning everything.

Fri, 10/19/2012 - 07:55 | 2903772 kurt
kurt's picture

They are, in fact, doing a better job at solving the senior Bush's "big problem" the dilemma: it's hard to steal wealth without simultaneously destroying it. In a sense the neocons solved the  problem... FOR THE CHINESE!!! (and the Saudi). Post peak America bleeds well.

Sat, 10/20/2012 - 16:30 | 2906770 morpheus000
morpheus000's picture

US is a mediocre performer at best across the board..

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!