Biderman On Obama As The Worst 'Fiscal' President Ever

Tyler Durden's picture

The US government will be bankrupt after another four years of the same Obama we had for the past four. Fitch as much as confirmed this when it suggested a downgrade is coming. TrimTabs' Charles Biderman takes us succinctly through the painful math of just what has happened in the last four years: since Obama has been president after-tax take-home pay for everyone who pays taxes is still down by about 5% nominally and more than 10% after inflation. Dismissing GDP as anything but a misguided and misused spreadsheet output, the bombastic Biderman is concerned - and rightly so - as he sums up: "My guess is that Mr. Obama and his close buddies have no idea what they are doing, or else they would not be doing what they have been doing. The most dangerous are those people who think they are smarter than they are."


Perhaps it is his ranting tone but the greyness of the storm-clouds in the background are perhaps the best analogy for what is to come...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
no taste's picture

Karl Rove is going to need an Obama phone.

Dear Clint Eastwood, A letter from an Angry Republican.

Zer0head's picture

I was going to add that we best get used to it casue 4 years is a long time and very importantly Michelle (to be known as MOBAMA) is ilayng in wait,  and make no mistake she could shred Hillary with one of her amazonian arms tied behind her back.   

Think about it long and hard, we have just completed the first four years of  what will be a sixteen year Obama Reign


America is not the America that many thought we knew and that demographic is expanding, by 2024 if you are unlucky enough to still be here words will not be able to describe that world 

goldfish1's picture

Paging Biderman:


Ain't Obama nuttin but the front man for the owners...

malikai's picture

Sorry Mr. Biderman, the Goldman horse didn't come in.

Here he was spotted last:

economics9698's picture

Obama doesn’t know squat about much but he does know communism. 

To quote Russian communist founder Vladimir Lenin:

“The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.”

“The surest way to destroy a nation is to debauch its currency.”

blunderdog's picture

Big fan of the bourgeoisie, are ya?

Ayr Rand's picture

Obama spent $5T to get 5M people jobs over 4 years. That, my friends, equates to $500,000 per year per job. Assuming these jobs pay an average $100,000 per year, and those getting the jobs pay 18% tax (the average), then the return on investment is -96%.

Of course we don't disagree with stimulus. We disagree with incredibly incompetent stimulus. 

Compared to this, Bernanke's idea of just dropping money from a helicopter ("a trillion here, a trillion there" to use his words) seems pretty cost-effective.

blunderdog's picture

"Obama" didn't spend $5T, though.  He spent about $600B.

Most of the $5T is money that is legally required to be spent.  It just doesn't make any sense to blame the President for Social Security and Medicare--it's not something he can CONTROL.

But my question was: why would anyone feel bad for the bourseoisie?  Think about it: they're the technocrats living around DC and the bankster-boys in Manhattan and Connecticut.  (And their ex-wives.)

economics9698 is CRYING for these people?  What in heaven's name for?  They've never been anything but shills.

rodocostarica's picture

Michelle as president? Anything is possible but that is a truly frankenstinian clusterfuck of an outcome. She is good though and with the same teleprompter who knows. And Michelle is so into the whole queen thing and would inherit the Obama machine and the money. 

God Im glad I moved down here. We have a woman president but at least she has a decent ass for her age. WTF.

words will not be able to describe that world

That statement there is the truth. No words could describe it.

midtowng's picture

When Reagan was running huge deficits I was told it was the fault of the Democratic House.

Now Obama is running huge deficits and I am told it is the fault of the presidency.

someone needs to get a better grasp of the Constitution.

NidStyles's picture

What does the Constitution have to do with the debt?

Spirit Of Truth's picture

Remarkable coincidence that Wall Street is currently suffering the impact of winter storm "Athena" (read: Athens) as today's break in mass psychology hit:

Is democracy failing consequent to the role of the "money masters"?

TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

Spirit Of Truth provided another glimpse into his peculiar world:

Remarkable coincidence that Wall Street is currently suffering the impact of winter storm "Athena" (read: Athens) as today's break in mass psychology hit

Coincidences happen. It doesn't make you Jesus.

Spirit Of Truth's picture

I'm not Jesus.  I believe I'm the reincarnation thereof:

There's a difference.

alangreedspank's picture

Apparently, it can be used to limit size and scope of governments. I tried to protect myself from a mugger with a piece of paper the other day and that didn't go over too well...

ACP's picture

Works better on spiders around the house.

"Hey, how's that guy gonna read that thing with it all rolled up like that?"

RSloane's picture

He'll get right back to you on that, I'm sure!

Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

Back then the House actually passed a budget every year.  Obama doesn't even bother to propose a budget anymore. 

Taffy Lewis's picture

I'm glad to see Uncle Charlie back here on ZH!

midtowng's picture

If it isn't even part of the budget process then it would be hard to put the blame on him.

Nels's picture

It is the fault of the president & harry reid.  The supposedly one-time high spending of TARP, etc, was locked in when the obamanation and harry reid refused to pass any new budgets.

midtowng's picture

so what you are saying is that Republicans can never be at fault. Period.

zerozulu's picture

This economy has become a runaway train going down hill. No one can stop it from crashing. So do what Romans did when the Rome was burning.

dlmaniac's picture

The most dangerous are those who don't pay tax and yet are allowed to vote on how much tax everyone else should pay.

Racer's picture

Like the CEOs of the likes of Amazon and that coffee company what ever it's called, have never used it but know they don't pay taxes!

midtowng's picture

You mean retired people?

Waterfallsparkles's picture

Retired People are the ones that will have to pay more.  They are the ones that are living on Dividends and they will be forced to pay 25% in taxes.  They also have not gotten increases in Cola for their Social Security.


Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

Thank the Bernank for all of that.  Can't earn any interest income, so they are forced to buy stocks that pay dividends.  Wait until those stocks take a big hair cut and it wipes out all of the dividends that they ever made on said stocks.  And no COLA for SS because CPI is pencil whipped to say whatever the Bureau of Bullshit wants it to say.  Its like a Jedi mind trick-----this isn't the inflation you are looking for.

gmrpeabody's picture

There's no inflation here..., move along.

LMAOLORI's picture



True and just because a person is retired doesn't mean they don't pay taxes they sure as hell do even on Social Security they pay federal taxes just like anyone else depending on their income, many states charge taxes on Social Security as well.  In addition to taxes on their pension, state taxes, local taxes,property taxes, etc.


Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

Taxes, taxes, taxes. I can't believe people want ever more government in all aspects of their lives. Talk about begging to be a slave.

LMAOLORI's picture



I know it seems the only way to escape taxes is death or by living on Welfare or a low income job because any taxes they pay, i.e., sales taxes is given back to them by the Earned Income Credit


The 49 Percent That Defeated Romney: Young Voters

Zero Govt's picture

DLmaniac  "The most dangerous are those who don't pay tax and yet are allowed to vote on how much tax everyone else should pay."

Never known any voter, taxpayer or not, ever in the history of democracy (cough) get to vote on the tax rate

alangreedspank's picture

Voting for the anti-business, rich hating guy = voting for potentially more taxes.

dirtbagger's picture

When one's choices are between a mediocre leader and a duche bag, mediocrity will win out every time.

Matt's picture

Take a look at the California Ballot Initiatives. They got to vote on:

Raising sales tax from 7.25 to 7.5%, creating new tax brackets over $250K ---> Passed,_Sales_and_Income_Tax_Increase_(2012)

Charge out-of-State businesses California income tax on sales made in California (sounds like a big deal, could affect products sold in California) ---> PASSED,_Income_Tax_Increase_for_Multistate_Businesses_(2012)

Raise sales tax and use the proceeds for education --> REJECTED,_State_Income_Tax_Increase_to_Support_Education_(2012)

Zero Govt's picture

Matt, i stand corrected, thanks

thanks and "f'n hell" ..i never thought the Progressives of California would allow anyone a right to vote against their theiving!!

Matt's picture

In California, the legislature needs a 2/3 majority to raise taxes. They also seem to have a huge problem with partisanism and encumbants lasting forever. As well, cutting spending is unpopular. Getting the people to vote on the taxes is the only chance they have to balance the budget / reduce the deficit.

Zero Govt's picture

as you know the correct way to balance the budget is to stop/cut spending, not grasp the wrong end of the stick, ala Christine Lagarde, and blame taxpayers for not contributing enough

not like politicians understand common sense things like that

Matt's picture

Not just politicians. In California, voters can pass initiatives that involve spending money, without passing any new tax or fees to fund that new spending. I'm pretty sure some of their expenses come from that.

Oh, and it gets better; as I understand it, initiatives cannot be repealed by the legislature; only another initiative can change/remove them.

monad's picture

All the talent is leaving California...

Harbanger's picture

I thought it was all the locusts.

zerozulu's picture

Every one is being bailed out by Tax payer. Question is, "Who is paying the Tax". Answer, No one. Country is run by the PRINTER.

Harbanger's picture

One way or another, the national debt will be paid by the 20-30 year olds and their future children.

VulpisVulpis's picture

I, for one, welcome our new imperial overlords

slaughterer's picture

Biderman is channeling the doom that Rosenberg somehow dropped on the way to the A Ward. 

Mr Pink's picture

I always thought it was one word.....OBAMAPHOOOONNNNEEEE