A Primer On Europe's Common Bank Supervisor

Tyler Durden's picture

The Eurozone was once again engaged in burning the midnight oil, in yet another futile endeavor, this time setting the stage for a common bank supervisor in the face of the ECB, which is somehow supposed to "regulate" Europe's thousands of banks. That this was a total practical dud can be seen in the response of the EURUSD to the news. However, for those interested in the theoretical nuances, whose actual implementation has once again been kicked into the future, here is a quick and dirty primer from SocGen.

Europe agrees single bank supervisor

EU Summit to focus on further steps towards banking union

European finance ministers finally hammered out a series of compromises to agree the terms for a common bank supervisor in another marathon session that extended into the early hours of Thursday morning. Under the agreement, the ECB will supervise banks with asset values of over €30bn or 20% of their home country’s GDP. The agreement is expected to be finalised by March 2013, and the new Single Supervisory Mechanism will start to become operational in March 2014. The agreement effectively clears the decks for the EU Heads of State meeting today to focus on the next steps toward a European Banking Union.

ECB to supervise European banks

Under the agreement, the ECB will have direct responsibility for banks with assets of more than €30bn, or representing more than 20% a country’s national output. This definition leaves most of Germany’s savings banks under the control of German national authorities. Every euro area country will have at least three banks directly supervised from Frankfurt. However as part of the compromise, the ECB retains the power to intervene in any bank and deliver instructions to national supervisors. The SSM will be composed of the ECB and national competent authorities. The ECB will be responsible for the overall functioning of the SSM. Under the proposals, the ECB will have direct oversight of euro area banks, although in a differentiated way and in close cooperation with national supervisory authorities. Non-euro area member states wishing to participate in the SSM will be able to do so by entering into close cooperation arrangements. Pierre Moscovici, the French finance minister, expressed his approval for what he said was a “good working balance”.

Direct recapitalisations by the ESM unlikely before 2014

However, Germany also won concessions on the timing of implementation, so that no fixed deadline is included in the text for the ECB to take direct oversight of the biggest banks.  There remains, however, a series of specified goals meaning the system could be up and running by March 2014. As such, Wolfgang Schäuble, the German finance minister, madeplain that one of the key purposes of the reform – to allow the ESM to directly recapitalized banks – was out of the question until well into 2014. “Again and again we have created expectations we cannot fulfil and that is very dangerous. We should be modest,” Mr Schäuble said, in a clear warning to countries that regard the creation of a central supervisor as a stepping stone to more risk-sharing. However, again reflecting the spirit of compromise, other leaders stressed that existing rules already allowed direct recapitalizations to take place so long as moves were subject to unanimous approval. The new supervisory mechanism should be fully ready by 1 March 2014, with about 200 banks automatically qualifying for direct ECB oversight, EU Financial Services Commissioner Michel Barnier, said at the press conference following the agreement. In the interim, the ESM could aid banks directly, using its own procedures and asking ECB supervisors to step in, he said.

Euro area ‘outs’ win double majority argument

Beyond agreement amongst euro area members, the other major point of friction was over the rights of non-euro area countries. Euro area countries eventually dropped their objections to UK-led demands for a “double majority” principle at the European Banking Authority while a series of provisions was also included in an attempt to address the legalrestrictions that prevented non-euro area members of the banking union holding full voting rights within the ECB. However, these proved insufficient for Sweden and the Czech Republic, which made clear they would not join the banking union in the near future.

Monetary policy decisions to be separated from supervision within the ECB

The ECB's responsibility for monetary policy is to be strictly separated from supervisory tasks to eliminate potential conflicts of interest between the objectives of monetary policy and prudential supervision. To achieve this, a supervisory board responsible for the preparation of supervisory tasks would be set up within the ECB. Non-eurozone countries participating in the SSM would have full and equal voting rights on the supervisory board.

The board's draft decisions would be deemed adopted unless rejected by the ECB Governing Council. National supervisors would remain in charge of tasks not conferred on the ECB, for instance in relation to consumer protection, money laundering, payment services, and branches of third country banks. The EBA would retain its competence for further developing the single rulebook and ensuring convergence and consistency in supervisory practice.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
GetZeeGold's picture



We need to hire a dictator....with a ring to rule them all.

HoaX's picture

"That this was a total practical dud can be seen in the response of the EURUSD to the news"

Which of course has nothing to do with fiscal-cliff fears coming from the US of A.

It seems the ball is now firmly in your court.

doomandbloom's picture

precursor to common everything...one Europe..

insanelysane's picture

It's all fine in theory until one of the bank supervisors orders a blitzkreig on Polish banks.

From Germany With Love's picture

Another thought: Can there be a growing union of nations under one banner without it sooner or later coming to civil war? Sooner or later the majority of nations will make a decision that touches vital interests of a minority. At which point the minority of nations is bound to test if they can get to simply ignore the majority vote. You know the rest.

Is that what the Euromancers are leading us to?

asteroids's picture

"... One Bank to rule them all and in the darkness bind them..." Tolkien got it right.

falak pema's picture

yes, he was talking about the FED.

HoaX's picture

Frodo: What do you want?
Aragorn: A little more caution from you; that is no trinket you carry.
Frodo: I carry nothing.
Aragorn: Indeed. I can avoid being seen if I wish, but to disappear entirely, that is a rare gift.

And my favorite:

Pippin: Anyways, you need people of intelligence on this sort of... mission... quest... thing.
Merry: Well, that rules you out, Pip.

Dareconomics's picture

A true banking union requires depisotory insurance and resolution authority. In the U.S., the FDIC handles these roles. Europe is trying to introduce a banking union when many banks, particularly in the periphery, are on the verge of failing. What that means is that a lot of German money will be needed to get this thing off the ground. Until the Germans and the rest of the FANG countries decide to become joint and severally liable with the PIIGS for a "EDIC," there is no banking union. Just another can kick: