This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The Geopolitical Hotspots Of 2013

Tyler Durden's picture


Because in a world in which markets no longer are affected by fundamentals, and reflect nothing more than what politicians (and their Wall Street lobbies) believe the "fair value" of risk assets should be, it is likely that any fat-tail events will emerge not out of the markets, but out of politics (and perhaps out of central banks, although it is a safe bet that the world's central planners will merely do much more of the same). The chart below summarizes the geopolitical hotspots of the coming 12 months, which together with everything else are no longer reflected in asset prices courtesy of the central banks completely destroying the market's discounting function.

Source: Deutsche Bank


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 01/14/2013 - 11:46 | 3150624 Payne
Payne's picture

You did not include Saudi Arabia which is an Arab spring events occurs the Petro dollar is dead.  This would be the Goal of China, Russia, and any other group that wants to take the air out of the US sails.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 11:48 | 3150633 Stackers
Stackers's picture

It's getting hot in here, so hot, so take off all your clothes

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:08 | 3150696 negative rates
negative rates's picture

So the cat is out of the bag you say.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 11:51 | 3150649 otto skorzeny
otto skorzeny's picture

House of Saud is buddies w/ Israel and has been stirring up Sunni V Shia bullshit to keep peasants in ME from noticing how disgustingly rich they are. Stuff like trying to destabilize  Syria and Iran is right out of CIA/Mossad playbook.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 13:49 | 3151170 bank guy in Brussels
bank guy in Brussels's picture

Quite true that the Sauds are part of the US-Israel 'axis of evil' ...

But also true the Saudis are in danger of being overthrown, as the great Jim Willie says

Have been talking to Muslim businessmen here who spend a lot of time in Saudi Arabia, and I told them about Jim Willie's views about the Saudi monarchy teetering

To my astonishment, they totally agreed, they say that is the word on the street in KSA (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) itself - the regime there will not last long

The times they are a changin' ...

For background on how dirty Saudi Arabia was, right from its beginnings with first the British and then the US intelligence agencies, the Saudi Wahhabi extremists with Great Britian, throwing out the more moderate Muslims who had been ruling there for centuries:

« The importance of the House of Saud to the British cannot be understood fully without looking back at the historical role that King Abdulaziz bin Saud (Ibn Saud) played in helping Britain and France to divide up the Ottoman Empire by means of the 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement, and also in bringing the Zionists into Palestine. When the British Empire picked up Ibn Saud, leader of the Wahhabi sect, to become the "Keeper of Two Holy Mosques," it was in a way the fulfillment of Empire's plan. The Hashemite dynasty, which claims the bloodline of the Prophet Muhammad, was the strongest traditional Arab force, but its back was broken when Ibn Saud threw them out of Mecca and Medina. »

The House of Saud:
British-Programmed Killer of Muslims

by Ramtanu Maitra

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 17:34 | 3152149 trav777
trav777's picture

you don't want to see "bad" iike 8mbpd off the world market

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 17:26 | 3152119 tango
tango's picture

Evidence contradicts your contention that Israel wants a Syrian change.  She prefers working with authoritarians like Mubarak and Assad or stealthily with regimes like Jordan, Morocco and Turkey.  What she wouldn't want is another Egyptian Islamic disaster in waiting. I've never understood the alleged CIA interest in Syrai - no valuable minerals, no oil, a place with phony national boundaries held together only by the Assads and their religious minority. 

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 11:46 | 3150625 TotalCarp
TotalCarp's picture

Hmmm didnt they highlight iraq instead of iran on the map while mentioning iran in the blurb?

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 11:53 | 3150659 Afrispaans
Afrispaans's picture

They so did. Must be sharing cartography with Fox News.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:01 | 3150684 TotalCarp
TotalCarp's picture

its utterly impossible to take this sht seriously.. Written by some junior vp in the banks basement aka the research floor i bet..

Is this a slow news month? Tyler/zh scrapping the bottom of the news barrel for these stories?

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:38 | 3150812 FeralSerf
FeralSerf's picture

The bottom of the news barrel is going to the scrap yard?  That's good news!

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 11:47 | 3150630 otto skorzeny
otto skorzeny's picture

"radical islam pushes into Africa"- I stopped reading- this must have been taken off of CIA website

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:32 | 3150786 JR
JR's picture

Agreed. First the US Empire attacks and when the defenders react the propaganda begins.

The US - its central planners at the Fed operating off the debt slavery of the American people - is using its financial power to export revolution around the globe, securing all resources for Global Empire. Civil wars and rebellions are perfect arenas for the western banking powers to ride to the rescue, kill many innocents and secure the resources.

At the same time, these agendas are destabilizing and dismembering the United States of America, threatening the United States as a coherent and sovereign nation, meshing it into global governance.

Here are the “roots of the coup” according to War Is a Crime .org in an April 2012 article entitled, U.S.—[Get Your] Hands Off Mali!:

“What sparked the coup was the central government's inability to deal with the rebellion now under way in northern Mali, a region populated by the Tuareg, an ethnically Berber, nomadic people who eke out a living in the inhospitable desert. Long-standing grievances of neglect by the government have led many Tuaregs to despair of reform.

“The simmering resentment came to a head in January after the U.S.-led bombing of Libya and the overthrow of that country's government. Around 2,000 Tuaregs who had been employed as soldiers by the Libyan government returned to Mali, heavily armed and with uncertain prospects of finding jobs or arable land. A rebellion broke out, one the government was in no position to counter, provoking a mutiny by angry rank-and-file Malian soldiers who chased President Touré into hiding. The Tuareg rebellion sharply escalated March 30, when rebels seized control of three key cities, including the legendary cultural and trading center of Timbuktu. The armed rebels who now control all northern cities have several factions. One wing is demanding independence for the north. Another says its goal is to create an Islamic republic operating under strict Sharia law – which might be all of Mali or simply the northern half, which this faction is calling Azawad..." The rest of the story:

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:45 | 3150845 FeralSerf
FeralSerf's picture

And in other news, the U.S State Dept and DoD have purchased 10,000 copies of Whack-a-mole for training purposes.

Unintended consequences are a bitch.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 11:49 | 3150638 tooriskytoinvest
tooriskytoinvest's picture

We’re Fast-Approaching A Tipping Point Into A Permanent Financial Decline: The Shrinkage In Wall Street Is Just Getting Started, Bill Gross Boosts Treasury Holdings, More Than Half Of Republicans Prepared To Let US Default, Western Governments May Soon Borrow In Renminbi, Economists See Slower Long-Term Growth In America’s Future

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:43 | 3150838 JR
JR's picture

The economy is a crisis now for anybody who wanted to do something, be something, save something, establish something, plan something. They are killing us. I already have heard comments from people – all stunned - who say they now know what it feels like to be a slave.

These are huge risks the Fed/DC combine are taking; they are flirting with Big Disaster economically.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 14:59 | 3151586 SamAdams
SamAdams's picture

Yes, people are waking up, but the generational gap is causing an unexpected problem.  Kids fresh out of high-school, are taught by Hollywood media that the illuminati is a "cool trend".  Every pop star and magazine is dishing out pyramids and eyes of horus, it's the hot new fad!  This squelches the alarm that the illuminati are real and they plan to implement a one world, dystopian, fascist-socialist (later communist) society.  Of course to do that, the sovereignty of the USA has to be eliminated.  So, if anyone here thinks for a moment that our economy is going to improve, you haven't been paying attention to the big picture.  Yes DC and the FED are going to do exactly what their masters tell them and unless a greater awakening happens before the confiscation of weapons, it is all over.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 17:35 | 3152158 tango
tango's picture

Wouldn't you think that the Illuminati would get their act together after operating behind the scenes for 10,000 years?  I mean, how smart can a group be when every poster in pajamas on ZH knows the intimate details and exact timeline?  LOL   Clue - there is no global conspiracy, simply a rising tide of folks educated in Keynesian theory who think central planning is the key to happiness.   And now that it's proven a failure they can only flouder, act and react.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:21 | 3150658 CunnyFunt
CunnyFunt's picture

I suppose then that Bolivia, Guinea and D.R. Congo are "fixed".


Cheap analysis ... could have gotten a better picture from a Yemeni cab driver.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 11:56 | 3150668 busted by the b...
busted by the bailout's picture

Rand Paul visits Israel.


I guess all future prez hopefuls must go.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 15:02 | 3151613 SamAdams
SamAdams's picture

Rand is like the lazy son/grandson who inherited the family business, only to sell out to a corporate suitor.  Why work when your money is for free?  He will make a fine president!

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 11:58 | 3150673 Uncle Zuzu
Uncle Zuzu's picture

Saudi Arabia had a budget SURPLUS of $100 billion last year.  Population 28 million. No risk of Arab spring here.  Plenty of $$ to throw around, on my math $3,600 per head.  So call it $10 to $15,000 per household.  Or half that if the royals use the other half to buy gilded Maseratis.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:15 | 3150718 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Could you maybe provide a credible source for that claim?

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 15:13 | 3151661 Jack Burton
Jack Burton's picture

Indeed! Many of this Israeli Blog Army appear on the ZH comments section to spread the Israeli propagnada should any ZH poster suggest Israel is a leech on US Taxpayers. As if they can counter the fact that American Tax Payers arm and fund Israel. Pull American tax dollars out of Israel 100%, and the state collapses totally in less than five years.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 14:18 | 3151374 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Well there you go, maybe you should have included it in your first post...

In case you haven't noticed, a lot of people simply make shit up here...

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:01 | 3150677 Mad Mohel
Mad Mohel's picture

I like how for Mali they write "Risk to gold/uranium" but for Venezuela, Nigeria, and Iran they forget to write, "these assorted red, black, and brown bastards are sitting on our oil."

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:01 | 3150683 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

In another kind of hotspot...

Imagine a lake so polluted and contaminated that spending just an hour on its shores would result in certain death, and the only way seen fit to deal with it is to fill the entire water body with concrete blocks to keep the toxic soil underneath from moving onshore. That lake is Lake Karachay in Russia’s Chelyabinsk Oblast, and it is considered by many to be the most polluted place on the planet.

As bad as Hanford is, the Russian topped it (bottomed it??)....

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:05 | 3150690 Dr. Engali
Dr. Engali's picture

We sure manage to fuck this place up.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:10 | 3150702 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

The worst is yet to come...

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:24 | 3150751 Manthong
Manthong's picture



Now we know where to exile the political and financial racketeers and their families after we finally round them up,  give them a fair trial and then convict them.


They can have a spa with natural hot springs.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 17:40 | 3152175 trav777
trav777's picture

wtf the russians couldn't build a pipeline to ukraine or bulgaria or something??!?!

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:02 | 3150687 Super Broccoli
Super Broccoli's picture

what about broken spain, greece, UK, France and the rest of damn EU ?

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:35 | 3150804 Seer
Seer's picture

Folks there are more responsible, they're WHITE! </sarc> (and, they fund shitty reports like this- can't bite the hand that feeds you)

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:09 | 3150697 AgAu_man
AgAu_man's picture

Note to Self:  "Stay the course:  Keep cash, job, low profile. Keep passports current.  Buy more Precious, Food, H2O, G+A, Meds, Tools, Firewood, coal.  Avoid paying 'voluntary/idiot surtax' with dumb traffic or parking violations -- not a penny to those bass-turds for their job security!  Maintain key friends, keep networking.  Ignore MSM, DC, Wall St.  Exhale, breathe deeply.  Go for walk/hike.  Plant a tree.  Stay the course."

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:39 | 3150815 Seer
Seer's picture

Keep a passport current AND plant trees?  And, firewood?  I cut, stack and shuttle the stuff, it's not exactly what I'd be looking to take along with me when I go traveling across borders...

Anyway, it's an otherwise sane post :-)

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:53 | 3150883 FeralSerf
Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:25 | 3150753 smacker
smacker's picture

US oft stated strategic policy to shift its prime military focus towards Asia (read China) can likely only be realised if it de-focuses on the likes of Iran and the Middle East, given that it hasn't got the military resources necessary to focus intensely on both regions. And what has Netanyahu got to say about this viz-a-viz Iran, given his publicly stated desire to bomb it.

But this may explain the apparent sudden change of plan recently when the US moved two carrier groups away from Iran & the Gulf back to Home Ports, as if the Iran/Middle East multiple crises had suddenly gone away. But they have not. Egypt, Libya, Syria, Qatar and other M/E sand pits remain in chaos.

There's also the small matter of US military forces now being sent to no less than 35 African countries to counter growing Chinese influence, reported over the weekend. But Africa is not Asia.

Is US overstretch ahead? I cannot help but get the impression that under Obama, US imperial foreign policy has descended into a mess.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:46 | 3150850 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Too rich:

Is US overstretch ahead? I cannot help but get the impression that under Obama, US imperial foreign policy has descended into a mess.

So where were you when Disk 'n W took up the crusade of rooting out Al-Queda in Iraq? Afganistan? My fuck, this in no defense of BHO, but you display zero credibility when you spout nonsense like this... 

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 14:15 | 3151356 smacker
smacker's picture

Methinks you read more into my comments than I wrote or intended.  Looking at US military deployment policy in recent decades, it has been able to manage its military resources to achieve its objectives, without major problems **whether you or I agreed with the policies or not**.

But of late we see serious problems emerging all over the world. I listed some of them. This looks to me like overstretch is on the horizon IF the US intends to continue being the global imperial master, hence my *?* previous comment. I may be wrong. Perhaps the inside thinking is that a few wars and more spending to match will kick-start the economy?

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 14:46 | 3151509 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

I stand by my statement, saying that "US foreign policy has descended into a mess on BHO's watch" is incredulous partisan bullshit...

Pop quiz: When did Egypt become a net imported of oil? Was it contemperaneous with any notable events?

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 16:11 | 3151879 smacker
smacker's picture

Flakmeister: Well, be my guest and stand by anything you want.

But let me give you one example of the recent odd situation that may have bypassed you, which looks like some sort of muddled policy in the Obama WH:

The US had one carrier group in the Gulf which was then increased to two in about 3rd Q last year. Then a third group was moved there together with some ~10,000 marines on board. Add to that all the support vessels and LHx vessels etc. God knows how many fighter planes that lot holds. There are few observers who didn't think this was a preparation for an attack on Iran if it failed to comply with demands.

About two weeks ago StratFor posted its latest map showing locations of US carrier groups and what did we find? The Gulf forces have now been reduced back to one carrier plus one LHx. All the rest are back in Home Ports. Result: Iran is now in a position to claim that it faced off the Americans and won. Iran decided to play war games in the Gulf to flex its muscles.

Likewise, as I said earlier, the apparent US strategy of focusing on Asia whilst it is also sending forces to 35 African countries, and the M/E is on fire.

NB: I'm not expressing personal views on the rights/wrongs of US foreign policy, merely that it seems rather muddled under Obama.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 19:45 | 3152539 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Clearly what I was referring to went way over your head....

Here is a big hint:

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 20:34 | 3152652 smacker
smacker's picture

Nope. It didn't go over my head. I spotted that you were trying to divert the debate away from Obama's seemingly muddled global foreign policy, by mentioning Egypt's trivial 2011 oil exports. Why not talk about the price of fish instead? It's just as relevant.{shrug}

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 22:07 | 3152873 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

You *really* don't get it...

What the fuck do you think they used for hard currency to keep food cheap for the masses? And what do you think happened when food inflation took over?

Anyone who spouts a avatar like yours is invariably a blowhard...

Tue, 01/15/2013 - 06:07 | 3153501 smacker
smacker's picture

Flakmeister: I actually get it a lot better than you and your socialist comrades might think. But at least you've now admitted that diverting our debate away from Obama's seemingly muddled global foreign policy with the risk of overstretch, and on to the price of food in Egypt, is your aim. When will you tell us about the price of fish? I can't wait. No, really.

What are you trying to hide? hhmmm.


Tue, 01/15/2013 - 11:05 | 3153943 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

You should note Trav's original comment below...

You are clearly an ideological windbag as you fail to grasp what was at the core of Egypt even when it is spelt out. Unless you think that US should either give them either more money or interfere even more directly....i.e. more overreach...


Tue, 01/15/2013 - 13:01 | 3154357 smacker
smacker's picture

yada yada yada.

Noted: Still no response from you about Obama's muddled foreign policy. {shrug}.


Best Regards

Your ideological windbag friend :-)

Tue, 01/15/2013 - 19:35 | 3155907 smacker
smacker's picture

WTF? That chart's nearly EIGHT years old!

Whatever, I investigated Peak Oil ~12yrs ago and have been peddling it ever since, yes really. So I hardly need you to educate me regarding US foreign policy in the Middle East.

However, since you are obviously pre-occupied by the subject, why don't you tell us why Obama is, for all intents and purposes, reducing US military presence in the M/E and Gulf/Iran (which btw has A LOT of oil/gas). Or is Obama's muddled foreign policy something you prefer not to talk about?

Do tell :-)

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 17:42 | 3152183 trav777
trav777's picture

shhhhhh...that is too close to mental third rails

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 12:48 | 3150857 Ghordius
Ghordius's picture

while I disagree with the message of your avatar I'd say I'm posing myself your question "Is US overstretch ahead?"

the US military is still designed with two and a half wars at the same time in mind, isn't it?

imho the big question will be how much the next war will cost, because for sure it will be difficult to finance expenses like the Iraq III affair - where Bush calculated (probably personally) that it would cost some 60bn

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 14:03 | 3151261 smacker
smacker's picture

Tch tch. What's wrong with my avatar?

On US military...yeah, 2.5 wars or summat like that. But wars come in different sizes and need different resources. I do not believe even the US could sustain major conflicts in the M/E at the same time as in Asia.

But my main point was one of confusing policy.

Costs are something I just shrug my shoulders at nowadays. We know that successive administrations are spending the nation into the ground.


Mon, 01/14/2013 - 15:15 | 3151675 Ghordius
Ghordius's picture

the nation? you sound American - are you sure about your avatar? ;-)

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 16:21 | 3151894 smacker
smacker's picture

"your" nation... ...I'm a Brit :-)

Yes, my avatar reflects what the EU is: a giant undemocratic, socialist construct. The current unelected EC President - Barroso - is an ex-Maoist. Many others who have control of the levers of power in the EU are commie/fascist leftovers from post WWII. Their objective is to create a new country "United States of Europe", whether the population wants it or not.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 22:09 | 3152875 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

The problem with Thatcherism is eventually you run out of North Sea oil...

TM Flakmeister 2008

Tue, 01/15/2013 - 06:20 | 3153504 smacker
smacker's picture

There speaks a socialist True Believer who would have been far happier if Britain's government had been overthrown by the likes of Arthur Scargill and his fascist thugs, and London turned into a branch office of Moscow. tch tch. {shrug}.


Here's a news snippet about your hero Scargill from last October, which exposes him for being no different from all other socialists:

"Arthur Scargill, the former union leader who led the miner's strike in the 1980s, has been giving evidence in the high court as his old union tries to evict him from his "grace and favour" flat in the Barbican in the City of London. It is a most choice location and the old socialist has had the union paying his rent for 20 years, in a flat that costs £34,000 a year to maintain. They stopped last year, fearing Scargill, 74, might get married at some point, perhaps to a much younger woman, and it is customary for many unions to provide accommodation to officials for the rest of their lives and to any spouses who outlive them."

Tue, 01/15/2013 - 11:20 | 3153950 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Yawn.... not defending the previous incarnation of British socialism, but you guys competely miss what was at the core of any sucess ascribed to Thatcherism..

And now that the net exports are gone, the UK is in the crapper again...

You are really just an ideological windbag incapable of an objective look at the situation....

Tue, 01/15/2013 - 12:55 | 3154335 smacker
smacker's picture

You fail to grasp that Britain's economy was going down the crapper way back in the 60s due to trade unions and their supporters in the socialist Labour Party, many of whom had connections with Moscow (yes, really). Add to that, some appalling management and away you go..........

In 1979, the crises reached a head and the nation faced a very stark choice: allow the Labour Party and trade union commies to seize control of Britain (which would most certainly have meant even more nationalisations and spelt the end) _or_ vote for Thatcher who promised to take them on, toe-to-toe. She won.

I was not too happy with the way in which North Sea oil revenues were spent; they were largely used as a welfare cushion to minimise social pain whilst she gave large sections of industry a cold bath. It was successful to a large extent, but obviously not as much as some of us would have liked. You need to understand that there are a lot of scum people in Britain -- inside and outside the Labour Party -- closet Marxists/fascists -- who spend their lives trying to wreck everything in the hope they will rise to the surface when it all collapses. Of course, MSM to this day never mentions it.

Now, when you gonna deal with your hero Obama's muddled global foreign policy??? Now or never???

Tue, 01/15/2013 - 13:42 | 3154480 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

So selling out completely to bankers and reaping a short whirlwind of oil revenues is seen as "brilliant policy"...

If Thatcherism was a *real* fix then you would not be where you are now...

You are so twisted in your view point that you don;t even recognize that I am not defending the other side, just pointing out the facts....

Tue, 01/15/2013 - 19:42 | 3155930 smacker
smacker's picture

Who sold out to the bankers? And who described *what* as "brilliant"? Not me.

You're just posting slogans and one-liners to give the false impression that your socialist views (and obvious intense dislike of Thatcher) are based upon knowledge and research They are not. Not least because you have little idea how British govt/society is organised, how things happen and the forces within them that have power and influence. If you think that Britain's system of govt should be torn down and rebuilt from the ground up, I will agree with you because that's what I've been arguing for, for several decades.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 14:48 | 3150989 Cyrano de Bivouac
Cyrano de Bivouac's picture

Well China is just started a 10 billion water project in Cambodia. There are water resources, drugs, farmland, and human trafficking potential throughout SE Asia. There are insurgent groups in  S.Thailand and Burma that can be used as proxies by interested parties. Let the show begin. P.S.  The "Activist Post" does a good job of covering issue.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 13:12 | 3150992 Debeachesand Je...
Debeachesand Jerseyshores's picture

The countdown has begun for the reemergence of the "anti-war movement" in American under another Liberal Democrat President.

I assume everybody has forgotten the "blow back" LBJ received after expanding the War in Vietnam by introducing US Combat Troops into that War.

The War on Poverty became the War on Vietnam...........

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 14:06 | 3151289 W74
W74's picture

For a Geopolitical map, someone seems to be confusing Iraq with Iran.  Deutch Bank needs to fire it's Cartographer.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 14:42 | 3151464 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

BTW, this what you get when you lose the Arctic Ice:

Extreme jet stream causing record warmth in the east, record cold in the west

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 14:46 | 3151517 Aegelis
Aegelis's picture

Too much "hope" and "change" in this map with little support for either.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 14:59 | 3151603 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Lots of change but little hope...

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 21:36 | 3152757 old naughty
old naughty's picture

no CHANGE no hope.

Mon, 01/14/2013 - 17:43 | 3152186 malek
malek's picture

German elections this year will be a "hotspot" about as much as the US elections were last year... yawn.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!