How Bad Could It Get For Bonds?
With stocks pushing to new multi-year highs - seemingly all-in on the Fed's newfound transmission mechanism - the bond market is beginning to quake just a little. 10Y rates shifted quickly through 2.00% today - hovering around 10-month highs - but the question is, just how bad could it get for bondholders if the Fed were to lift their repressing foot of the yield-seeker's throat. While we believe they are missing the circular nature of any Fed implied tightening on stocks (and therefore bonds reflexively), Goldman sees 10Y yields 120-240bps under 'fair' currently thanks to Fed QE efforts - and believes 4.0% yields are on the cards by 2016. Our question - what exactly would HY spreads look like under this 'bullish' scenario? And for the stock bulls - is this just catch-up by bonds or the great rotation so many hope for? And if Goldman believes this - why is their (and their primary dealer friends) holdings of Treasuries so extremely high?
Goldman sees a one-way street to 4% yields by 2017...
as the Fed's footprint knocks 120-240bps off Treasury yields...
Of course, as we noted, this unilateral analysis misses the one big point - that a (belief in the) removal of the punchbowl by the Fed (which is realistically the only way yields will rise this far this fast) would have a liquidity-crushing impact on the difference between equity valuations and fundamentals - and while Treasuries may see volatility rise (from record lows)...
...we suspect safe haven flows (to explicitly more attractive bond yields) will temper the real explosion (and rotation) so many expect.
As we will not go gracefully back to an old normal market any time soon...
We suspect - just as oil will eventually self-regulate the expansion hopes of local economies via energy price margin compression - that treasury weakness will not be seen as hope-for-recovery-driven but an opportunity for better yields as the boomers remain far more risk-averse (especially at almost all-time highs in stocks).
- advertisements -
- 13799 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:
- UBS On "How Bad Might It Get" And Why "Sooner Or Later Intense Instability Will Resume"
- How Currency Devaluation Can Be A Bad Thing
- And More Bad News For Bank Of America: SEC Says Bank Of Lynch Loan Policy May Have Been "Inconsistent With Industry"
- Why An Outsized LTRO Will Actually Be Bad For European Banks
- Guest Post: How Increasing Inflation Could Affect Housing Prices - Correlating Mortgage Rates And Housing Prices








That last chart is an incredible testimony to the unsustainability of what they are doing.
They are just creating a spring loaded disaster.
hujel
When the various bubbles start to pop across the globe, yield on treasuries will once again head lower in a safe haven trade. To believe that we will see 4% on the 10 year, you would have to think that the Fed can keep all the global bubbles inflated for 3 more years while stopping its purchasing of treasuries. The reality is that if the Fed stops its purchases, the bubbles will pop.
and what bubbles r u talking about? u hace to realize that THE BUBBLE IS NOW THE BUBBLE. did i just mind freak you?
like that guy with the orange skin kyle bass said.... keep your eye on the CDS curves. he was refering to japan but applies to all super debt kuntries
for the recor i have been short treasuries and making money im fighting the fed with brass knucks People think its an impossible notion for a bond reversal..... think again
How much liquidity could the FED remove by selling its assets when the bond market tanks? Current value of the portfolio is 2 trillion. How much would its portfollio be worth if it starts selling its assets? They would not ever be able to remove the liquidity.
I'm loving the fact that we now have penny-stock volatility in the Treasury market. We are all degenerate gamblers now.
Some of us are not gambling; we are just degenerates.
What about gold? How bad can it get for gold? Seems pretty bad. I wish we'd get a $200 drop just to clean out all the weak hands.