This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The Global End Game

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Via Gordon T Long of GordonTLong.com,

As we discussed previously, an over-indebted, overcapacity economy cannot generate real expansion. It can only generate speculative asset bubbles that will implode, destroying the latest round of phantom collateral. The following clip succinctly links Charles Hugh-Smith's 14 points in the global endgame to the cycle of deflation from the business cycle, credit cycle, and more critically to the emerging version sought by our current slew of Central Bankers.

 

FOURTEEN POINTS:

  1. "Boost Phase" of Credit Expansion
  2. Overextended Credit Expansion and Over Capacity
  3. Financialization and Collateral
  4. Era of Financialization
  5. Growing Malinvestment
  6. Phantom Collateral from Asset Bubbles
  7. Bubble Implosions
  8. Impaired Debt and Policy Decisions
  9. Stalled Consumption
  10. Cheap Money Offered
  11. Shrinking Loans and Bank Speculation
  12. Search for Yield from Shrinking Pool of Productive Assets
  13. Increasingly Speculative Investments with high Risk
  14. Stagnation - Over-indebted, overcapacity with limited growth.

HOW THEY MAP TO THE CYCLE OF DEFLATION

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 03/10/2013 - 15:41 | 3317481 Kirk2NCC1701
Kirk2NCC1701's picture

Cliff Notes:  Create cost-free Confetti-Money.  Have people trade their stuff for your Confetti, till they are your eternal serfs.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 15:46 | 3317497 Abraxas
Abraxas's picture

Everything is still developing according to the grand plan. No changes, no surprises. 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:06 | 3317543 Skateboarder
Skateboarder's picture

The one where most of the population is annihilated and the rest move underground, kinda like in 12 Monkeys?

*cue circus sounds*

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 18:57 | 3317924 SheepleLOVEched...
SheepleLOVEcheddarbaybiscuits's picture

Hey tyler, you forgot the last step:

 

Global ZIRP to transfer ownership of everything to the banks.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:08 | 3317949 narapoiddyslexia
narapoiddyslexia's picture

The last step is war.

The next-to-the-last step is trade war.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100023283/an...

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:03 | 3318169 Spirit Of Truth
Spirit Of Truth's picture

Collective Western manic insanity has run its irrational course.  Indeed, expect WAR to follow:

http://www.secondkoreanwar.com

Mon, 03/11/2013 - 10:28 | 3319153 IrritableBowels
IrritableBowels's picture

Hey aren't you the guy who believes he's the second coming of christ?

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:24 | 3317592 OutLookingIn
OutLookingIn's picture

The ONLY constant is change itself!

The "window" has closed.

The only egress from the present paradigm is to 'smash' the window glass.

In order to let in fresh air and start anew.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:40 | 3317640 ElvisDog
ElvisDog's picture

Well if that isn't the Central Banker's plan, it should be. They should trade the $85B they generate each and every month for real, tangible, productive assets - land, factories, real estate, ports. At over $1T of fiat money creation it wouldn't be long before the bankers owned everything that was worthwhile owning.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:05 | 3317720 spinone
spinone's picture

Its all mortgaged to them, so when they stop printing money and the "owners" can't pay their debts, the banks get em.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 15:45 | 3317498 Charles Nelson ...
Charles Nelson Reilly's picture

I was under the impression Bitcoin was going to solve all of these "problems"?

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:29 | 3317601 francis_sawyer
francis_sawyer's picture

When you're stoned on hash whacking off to porn ~ "problems" seem to go away [at least for awhile]...

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:01 | 3317934 GMadScientist
GMadScientist's picture

Only if hammers can build houses.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 15:51 | 3317507 paperlessforms
paperlessforms's picture

I understand that if everyone doubles their money supply then prices double but incomes double too. So, since money is neutral (2nd year economics syllabus) nothing (much) bad happens. Just eveyone pays double but they have double the money to pay.

Where it does NOT WORK is where one country doubles their money supply and the other's do not. Then that country currency is halved in worth and Zimbabwee, German style inflation kicks-in destroying everyone's cash pile in that currency.

But in the game going on at the moment, all is OK except for those not in the club whose exported products will get relativley more expensive... bla bla - you know the rest...not teaching egg sucking here in the comments... bla bla

 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:03 | 3317536 css1971
css1971's picture

Say money supply increases about 7%pa. Did you get a 7% pay raise last year? No, employees get a CPI increase which would be 1-2%. This is how business and asset owners make increasing profits over time and it's how the rich become richer against the rest of the population.

So money supply doubles, incomes don't. Neither does debt btw.

Money is NOT neutral. I don't know what economics school you're being taught but it is complete bollocks.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:38 | 3317797 BigDuke6
BigDuke6's picture

With regard to the money printing there is a war going on between West and East Central banks.   As the "paper" price is knocked down to preserve the Dollar the Eastern Central Banks step in and relieve the West of it's real physical Gold.
Soon there could be a disconnect between paper and physical.
Eventually there will only be "physical" and then some countries will use their Gold to back their currencies.   This is the only way all of the debt in the market will be covered as the price of Gold then is revalued upwards to big figures.
Don't be fooled by all the negative talk.  Buy as much physical Gold as you can before it's too late.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:26 | 3317598 BadKiTTy
BadKiTTy's picture

Dude ....... Seriously ....."incomes double too"

Depends where you sit in the food chain I guess. Top 1% maybe ..... Bottom 80%.... Not so much.

K@

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:36 | 3317625 KnightTakesKing
KnightTakesKing's picture

Dude. Where the hell do you work where incomes are doubling? Everyone I know has had their pay frozen for the past few years or has lost their job.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:27 | 3317776 quid pro quo
quid pro quo's picture

That can't be...the "analysts" over at MSNBC have just released the joyous news that unemployment is way down and the market is hitting new highs...we're in a full steam ahead productivity mode that is unrivaled in modern economic times. 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:42 | 3317647 ElvisDog
ElvisDog's picture

See my post above. It depends who gets to create the money and what they're exchanging it for. Fiat money is intrinsically worthless, the only value it has is based on a perception that it is a store of value and (more importantly) legal tender laws that says people have to accept it. The Fed can create more "money" out of thin air and exchange that money for real, tangible assets. It literally is counterfeiting and is not "neutral" in any way.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:10 | 3317739 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

paperless forms:

"Global macro and some micro economic analysis."

ya gotta' study harder, and not in the tracks that would lead you to the exalted "Economics PhD."

and a reddie on ya.

- Ned

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:37 | 3317795 mumbo_jumbo
mumbo_jumbo's picture

incomes double??? WTF incomes in the US peaked in 1970....where you been?

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 23:33 | 3318453 archon
archon's picture

What really happens is that the money supply doubles, but the first ones who get to spend the doubled-money-supply are the banksters.  Banksters spend the money at the current prices, cause inflation, and by the time everyone else's salary doubles, the prices have already doubled to match the increased supply.  This is why when the money supply expands, it's never given to the ordinary people first, because then it would be the banksters who are subject to inflation.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 15:52 | 3317512 q99x2
q99x2's picture

Just watched Smith on the latest Keiser Report.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:01 | 3317533 Investor-1
Investor-1's picture

Money supply doubles, prices double. I rather double my own money. Whatever happens in our financial system, traders can always make money trading.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:22 | 3317585 in4mayshun
in4mayshun's picture

You could make the same argument about going to a casino.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:12 | 3317744 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

How do traders make a small fortune in the market?

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:27 | 3317772 optimator
optimator's picture

They start with a large fortune.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 22:54 | 3318386 translator zero
translator zero's picture

+1

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:23 | 3318205 Bear
Bear's picture

Are you out of your mind? It's hard enough (and risky enough) to trade when you know the counter party or the trade is cleared by exchange agents ... but to trust a specialized broker to trade, protect and remain solvent is like trusting Jon Corzine to protect my wealth.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:06 | 3317544 stormsailor
stormsailor's picture

i must not be much of a trader then. cause for years i kicked ass in equities and futures, and after march of 2009 i can't find a way to read what will happen next.  and when i do.  wam,  i get burned.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:03 | 3317936 GMadScientist
GMadScientist's picture

So you're Greenspan's fluffer!

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:14 | 3317563 There ya go again.
There ya go again.'s picture

15.   Somebody starts a war...........

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:22 | 3317584 JPM Hater001
JPM Hater001's picture

Yup. Kyle Bass was pretty clear about that.  These always end in war.

 

The only real question is between whom?

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:26 | 3317595 falak pema
falak pema's picture

you can be sure of ONE proponent; the other remains mystery! 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:26 | 3317597 in4mayshun
in4mayshun's picture

Hard to say who the main actors will be to start but I'm fairly confident that it will end with war between the elite and the rest of us.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:49 | 3317643 Anusocracy
Anusocracy's picture

That war has been going on for at least ten thousand years.

It's the Alphamaleians vs. the Hoipolloians.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:16 | 3317751 eddiebe
eddiebe's picture

JPM, the US has been at war (what) for just about ever? At least somewhere.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:25 | 3317770 hardcleareye
hardcleareye's picture

The recent US history "war events" that you are eluding to are not they types of war Bass was suggesting.   We are talking global style conflicts were the winners gets to rewrite history and put the spoils of booty into their kitty...  we are talking large section of populations being killed.....  To the victor goes the spoils.... 

Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan etc... have been regional "skirmishes", a small prelude of what is to come.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:14 | 3318186 Bear
Bear's picture

It's always so encouraging ... reading Zerohedge

Tue, 03/12/2013 - 04:27 | 3321695 r3phl0x
r3phl0x's picture

When you're aware, you can despair!

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:14 | 3317564 eddiebe
eddiebe's picture

I think the end game is even more insidious. My guess is that the elite will create massive population decimation one way or an other. I don't know if they will risk allowing WWIII because of the danger involving nukes. However, creating massive die offs using biological agents, or famines by using HAARP or playing games in the futures markets would be a possibility.

Put yourself in their shoes. Do they need or want all of us using up their space and resources? No!

Do they need all of us to threaten them with ideas of more equality or guillotines? Certainly not!

They certainly don't want or need more expansion of any kind, they already have so much more than they could possibly use or need. The only bubble they are concerned about is the population bubble and possibly the information bubble. How many blond babes that know their game do they want?

Anyway, they probably have figured many end games with them sitting pretty and us not so much at all.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:47 | 3317659 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

+1.....   Operation depopulation

They want to get rid of the worthless eaters

Mon, 03/11/2013 - 00:20 | 3318507 Matt
Matt's picture

Whether they want to or not, if we really are over the hill on Peak Oil, there may be only 10 percent as much hydrocarbon energy in 2050 as there is today. Could be down to half today's energy production by 2025. Without oil/coal/nat gas to make and transport all that food, population will go down one way or another.

Mon, 03/11/2013 - 00:47 | 3318535 zerozulu
zerozulu's picture

I think they just want to eliminate middle class. They need "worthless eaters" to polish their shoes.

Mon, 03/11/2013 - 01:11 | 3318546 Lordflin
Lordflin's picture

That would be them... Banking class are the worthless bread gobblers... I have always hated that phrase... they are nothing but parasites.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 22:47 | 3318379 Crash Overide
Crash Overide's picture

"I don't know if they will risk allowing WWIII because of the danger involving nukes. "

 

One thing I have thought about... if the shit hits the fan who is going to monitor the 150+ nuclear reactors in the US, many of which are at the end of their engineered usefulness and have regular failures and technical issues due to the aging infrastructure. I think we all forget just how sketchy the nuclear power situation is on this planet.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:21 | 3317582 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Better yet, a _fill_in_the_blank_  global economy that cannot significantly increase its oil supply cannot expand....

Which begs the question, expand to what end??? Cancer expands without limit or until the host dies, is that what our destiny and fate is?

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:03 | 3317937 GMadScientist
GMadScientist's picture

Ooh ooh pick me pick me!

"Counter-economic"

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:23 | 3317587 Kirk2NCC1701
Kirk2NCC1701's picture

I believe this cycle was also called the "Rowing of the economy", whereby the money supply was inflated and deflated in a deliberate and controlled manner. 

The person(s) controlling the money supply could thus control the economy.  As the controllers, they and their family & friends could reap maximum benefit by knowing when to buy & sell, when to convert paper assets for real assets and vice versa.  It was and remains the ultimate "front-running" of the economy.  It is the Game of games, that makes mere mortals defacto kings of men, and bestows them with god-like powers.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:36 | 3317630 max2205
max2205's picture

Bens got your back. Nothing makes sense

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:06 | 3317634 falak pema
falak pema's picture

Meanwhile in Tinsel Town : 

Jeremy Siegel On The Odds Of Dow 18,000 - Business Insider 

This does't sound like the end of the world ! 

Unless this guy Siegel is like the guy selling unlimited work in CA in that iconic movie : "the grapes of wrath"...5 cents a crate may be coming back to USA...who wants to pick Oranges in competition with the tex mex and the chicanos? 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 16:58 | 3317689 Edward Fiatski
Edward Fiatski's picture

Fiatski is always up for some Charles Hugh Smith goodness.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:12 | 3317745 The Invisible Foot
The Invisible Foot's picture

I can't keep kicking this dipshit Bernanke much longer.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 17:21 | 3317763 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

"...financialization that is untethered from the real economy of producing goods and services."

Exactly.

The stock market is the current asset bubble - cotton candy indexes, completely removed from economic reality.

Great stuff Gordon and Charles.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 18:33 | 3317879 Tombstone
Tombstone's picture

We need businesses to expand capital investment.  But, that trend is heading in the wrong direction.  I guess share buybacks, increasing dividends and buying other companies is the game for now.  That doesn't create jobs.  Benny's QE isn't creating much increased consumer demand.  Expecting the consumer to increase debt is senseless unless he has the capacity and need to do so.  In the long run, central planning fails every time.  It is failing now, but the bums in the big W see it as the opportunity to gain full power over the slave class.  Pass me an oar, number 41.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 18:51 | 3317913 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

Large businesses and corporations don't give a shit about people or the nation, they are bent on raking in cash, off-shoring profits and employment, doing M&A and downsizing employment, and parasitizing any assets the middle class has left and shoveling them to the 1%.  Our branches of government are intentionally complicit in enabling this hegemony.

The Kleptoligarchy marches forward; crony capitalism and socialism hand-in-hand with an increasingly facist law enforcement and judicial machine that practices selective rule-of-law to further the destruction.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:09 | 3317950 ekm
ekm's picture

Incorrect.

Very large businesses are no longer businesses. They are simply government branches since it is supposed the gov will never let them fail.

 

Hence large businesses are simply establishments where people who do NOT work get employed to collect salaries by NOT working.

It's like being on welfare, but at extremely high salaries.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:52 | 3318041 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

It's all about timing

They're about to play GOD.....

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 20:08 | 3318068 SHRAGS
SHRAGS's picture

EKM, love your posts, keep them coming.  Here's some more info for your primary dealer takedown thesis: Mervyn King backs RBS breakup - five years too late.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 18:37 | 3317894 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

Has anybody read the official UN version of the Agenda 21 proposal?

I'm a big land owner, look at who's buying and merging all the farmland in the U.S. (UN)

How about the UN small arms treaty that's about to come to vote late march?

See a pattern? I used to be skeptical.....

 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 18:51 | 3317912 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

On June 9, 2011, President Obama signed Executive Order 13575, Establishment of the White House Rural Council, with goals to take complete control of public lands and rural areas for development. This aligns with the purposes of Agenda 21, a United Nations environment and development program that removes local say in how lands and farms are managed. “Virtually every aspect of rural life seems to now be part of the government’s mission,” writes Mike Opelka. ~Ed.

On June 9, 2011, President Obama signed his 86th Executive Order, and almost nobody noticed.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 18:58 | 3317926 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

Section One of 13575 states the following:

Section 1. Policy. Sixteen percent of the American population lives in rural counties. Strong, sustainable rural communities are essential to winning the future and ensuring American competitiveness in the years ahead. These communities supply our food, fiber, and energy, safeguard our natural resources, and are essential in the development of science and innovation. Though rural communities face numerous challenges, they also present enormous economic potential. The Federal Government has an important role to play in order to expand access to the capital necessary for economic growth, promote innovation, improve access to health care and education, and expand outdoor recreational activities on public lands.

 

 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:01 | 3317933 ekm
ekm's picture

FOOD again. Pls Give me a link of the article from mike opelka

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:05 | 3317941 ekm
Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:06 | 3317948 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

As you wish....

http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/does-the-new-%E2%80%98white-...

For what it's worth EKM, your on to something but it is so much more...The grand plan is pretty staggering

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:13 | 3317959 ekm
ekm's picture

I don't think it's got anything to do with UN. I strongly think that the supply chains are already broken and the federal gov stands ready to expropriate the land.

 

Few people know that expropiation is legal in USA and the western world and it happens quite often.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain

 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:26 | 3317985 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

It has everything to do with the UN..... Read the UN version of agenda 21.

Obama hands sovereignty over to the UN

What's next? One world, One bank, One leader ( any guesses?)

They're just putting all their ducks in a row first.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:32 | 3317990 ekm
ekm's picture

You could be correct, but the way I see UN, it's just a smoke and mirrors organization to INVENT HIGH PAYING JOBS FOR THE ELITES of each country

It has no power, it's decision are not binding and nobody actually cares about UN. Just my opinion.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:37 | 3318007 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

I disagree, The UN is VERY VERY powerful,

 

That's how they're going to pull the whole thing together, representatives from every nation voting for the good of so called mankind.

 

 

 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:40 | 3318013 ekm
ekm's picture

I strongly recommend you take care of your own deserved property first and foremost. Check my comment above, to you.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:55 | 3318049 Rustysilver
Rustysilver's picture

ekm,

UN is Russia, China, US, UK and France.  I don't know of all the inner political working of UN, but unless these 5 countries agree, nothing gets done.

Look what splendid job UN is doing in Haiti.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 20:32 | 3318113 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

The US is the linchpin

gotta get those guns first.... then the pieces fit nicely.

 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:05 | 3318173 Accounting101
Accounting101's picture

I'm seem to be confused. Are you all saying that I still should be on the lookout for those black helicopters and blue helmets? Was it the UN who destroyed the western economic structure in 2008? I thought it was guys like Lloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon with the help of both democrat and republican lawmakers. Lawmakers we all voted for.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 22:13 | 3318318 ekm
ekm's picture

I recommend you worry about your own gov and I worry about mine, but I don't really care about UN.

It's useless and worthless, IMO.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 22:28 | 3318347 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

Come on ekm, open your mind and do the research

It's what got you here.

                 Your probably the only one here that could figure it out

                  This is my last post. seeya.

 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 22:36 | 3318360 ekm
ekm's picture

Ok. I may spend sometime on it, but I'm still focused on economics.

Have a good night.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 20:59 | 3318162 Accounting101
Accounting101's picture

Oh, you mean just like the emergency manger or Emergency Educational Authority where a state chief executive can arbitrarily nullify democratically elected school boards and local governments? Is that the same thing?

How many of you cheer EM laws???

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:12 | 3318180 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

You have to read my couple posts before this.

We have the same thing (EM laws) in my state, but it's on a state level, not federal.

                  And no I'm not cheering.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:27 | 3318214 Accounting101
Accounting101's picture

But it's still usurping democracy, whether at the state, federal or continent level. The will of the people is actively thwarted to ensure the Oligarchs get the debts assets they hold serviced. The UN is the least of our problems.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:37 | 3318237 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

You got to think big picture...

I had a hard time accepting all this when some very smart people showed me.

I was like Neo in the Matrix....NO WAY

But then one day.. I seen it.

It's hard to take everything you know and forget that... AS hardcore as ZH is, It's still just a scratch.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:45 | 3318255 22winmag
22winmag's picture

It's just more unenforceable toilet paper, like NDAA, that will never come near it's intended end result...

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:55 | 3318276 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

Play chess? you set everything up

Great players are playing 3-4 moves out

               They will create a crisis and the whole thing will fall together

               Like a thief in the night

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:38 | 3318006 ekm
ekm's picture

If you own a lot of land, I strongly recommend you print up the EXPROPIATION article from wikipedia, contact few lawyers and get together with other land owners to start having a plan right now, cause my friend....THEY'RE COMING TO GET YOUR LAND if my conjecture of 'shriking food abundance' gets fully proven and I'm affraid it will.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:42 | 3318015 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

Already underway, I know all the huge land owners in my state and everyone knows full well what's about to unfold.

Don't give up your guns.....If they get those....it's over

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:46 | 3318025 ekm
ekm's picture

Excellent

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:43 | 3318250 22winmag
22winmag's picture

Nothing a little hot lead can't solve.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 21:47 | 3318261 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

I don't know, I think we're in for quite a fight

the fight of our lives.....

 

Mon, 03/11/2013 - 17:36 | 3320712 AGoldhamster
AGoldhamster's picture

Agree ... Hungary does it already to Austrian farmers ... even contracts & deals which have long been sealed.

1929ff well underway. On several fronts.

Have 05-05-2013 (+/- 2 weeks) on your watchlist.
For a major uranian turn down into 2016-02-02 (+/- 2 weeks). 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:06 | 3317946 The worst trader
The worst trader's picture

Bullish! Just buy everything, what could wrong?

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:13 | 3317951 IamtheREALmario
IamtheREALmario's picture

It is a shame that the parasite class is able to use value diluting fiat money to both direct investment/malinvestment and at the same time enrich themselves while impoverishing the working classes.

It seems as if the system should be able to work ... and actually it did for quite a while until the bankers, corporatist cronies, politicians and other parasitic hangers on figured out that they could just print as much money as they want for themselves without contributing anything of value to society or the world.

Those who have contributed value through their labor get squashed by inflation and any savings they might have had evaporate.

IMO, the biggest bugaboo for any single economy is the Apple syndrome (chasing labor arbitrage around the world). When profiteering for profiteering sake through labor arbitrage becomes the basis of decision making then things get out of whack in the higher labor cost country.... and over time it gets hollowed out, moving tangible assets to the lower labor rate country.

Maybe that is what is considered fair or in the best interest of the world as a whole, but it sure leaves the higher labor rate country in  bad shape.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:22 | 3317975 Bingfa
Bingfa's picture

The whole thing was planned....

Globalization

unemployment (worldwide)

crisis

Now for the grand finale....

 

All while we were asleep.

 

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 19:35 | 3318001 LongBallsShortBrains
LongBallsShortBrains's picture

Buy the fucking dip
Buy the rip

Just buy it.

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 22:58 | 3318371 Griffin
Griffin's picture

Apparently the future is unbelievably bright in Iceland. It has just been discovered that a large part of the island is made of gold, according to experts its possible to mine 400 gr out of every ton.

A map that shows the golden coast of Iceland

http://www.visir.is/islenskt-gullaedi-i-uppsiglingu-/article/2013130229056

There have been a few attempts in the past to search for gold in Iceland, for example in Drapuhlid mountain on Snaefellsnes, but the gold they found turned out to be fools gold, pretty, but worthless. It is now a national park.

The oldest part of Iceland is only 20 million years old.

Nobody has ever found any gold in Iceland, or any metals of value.

 

Then there is the great oil adventure, according to experts there is a enormous oil field in the Dragon region, some 150 nautical miles from shore in the north east quarter of Iceland at the depth of 2000 meters.

No data exists for the region, who happens to be close to the volcano island Jan Mayen but somehow experts have figured out that it is rich with oil.

A map that shows the ground heat in the region, notice the black line that runs trough Iceland, its the Mid Atlantic Ridge.

http://vulkan.blog.is/blog/vulkan/entry/1286368/

The red triangle is the oil prospect area, only the north east corner of it is not in a hot zone. Earthquakes happen quite frequently on or near the ridge.

Odds of finding oil in a place like that seem very unlikely, as it takes low heat conditions to create and sustain oil and gas deposits. No one has ever found any indication of oil or gas deposits in this area.

 

The third adventure is to double the energy production in Iceland by drilling a bunch of deep drilling wells.

The idea is to sell energy to Europe trough a undersea cable.

This has not been as easy as it might look on paper, because when you drill into a active volcano and frack the well you get lots of quakes, then you get stuff out of the hole that is very toxic and corrosive, it can destroy seals and tubes of steel, and when you pump it into the ground you get more quakes. Those quake swarms often develop a life of their own, unrelated to the boreholes in the area.

The biggest drill in the country in snow drilling on the Reykjanes area, not far from Reykjavik.

http://www.ruv.is/frett/staersti-jardbor-landsins-a-reykjanesi

The areas to be exploited on Reykjanes are highly active and in "intensive care" by geologists because of recent activity.

 

The gold idea and the oil adventure are a bit pathetic and not likely to fool anyone, but the sea cable thing is something to worry about.

 

 

 

Mon, 03/11/2013 - 00:08 | 3318486 shinobi-7
shinobi-7's picture

Interesting but it most certainly does not stop there. Quite a few points must follow these 14.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!