This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Israel Attacks Are Not Irrelevant
Via Mark J. Grant, author of Out of the Box,
“Force and fraud are in war the two cardinal virtues.”
-Thomas Hobbes
At the center of any military campaign is the art of deception. In the military nothing is done without a strategy, generally planned well in advance, and the misdirection of the enemy is always part of any campaign. I have studied enough warfare to understand the concept and it is often some grand deceit, properly implemented, that lies at the heart of winning a battle.
"Israel may not believe in Judas Iscariot but they certainly know the story."
-The Wizard
It would be a political disaster for Israel to attack Iran. We may begin our consideration with this premise. On the other hand, it would be politically acceptable for Israel to respond to any aggression that was inaugurated by Iran. Self-protection is always a respectable retort.
Israel cannot and will not allow Iran to have nuclear weapons that can be delivered into the center of Tel Aviv. Iran, engaged in so many lies about its nuclear production that some divinity could not sort them out, continues to exhale its perjury. So to solve its problem Israel must find some way to call Iran out and get them to militarily invoke a crisis to which Israel can then respond. It seems to me that Israel has found its method in their attacks on Syria.
Syria has no capacity to effectively harm Israel. So, screaming in agony from the Israeli insult, they turn to Iran for help. Iran, governed by a delusional crowd, come rushing in to help Syria and instigates some sort of conflict with Israel. Then Israel, claiming that it has been attacked by both Syria and Iran responds and forcefully responds. So as part of the military campaign Israel blows up the nuclear facilities in Iran justified on the basis that they were attacked first. It will not be nice and it will not be pretty but I have a suspicion that Israel is setting up for this sort of confrontation.
Now outliers are funny things. They reside in a community with Black Swans and Pigs that fly. It is an Orwellian designed concept built and painted by Salvador Dali with additional construction provided by Escher. The civilized world rarely pays attention to these denizens because they almost never bother us. No need to make any allowance for these creatures if they are leaving us alone.
Occasionally though, if you have been on the playing field long enough, there is the odd whiff of rancid air that floats past your nostrils. It is missed by most and then dismissed by even the few that notice. Yet I can smell the air and I have stopped to follow the scent. I believe Israel is putting the ball into play and some appreciation, if not scheme, might be concocted now to protect what you have in a world that could be spun on its backside. It is not a surety and it is not readily apparent but Israel has now attacked Syria twice and so it is not the outlier either that the markets deign as irrelevant.
I will tell you; the Israeli attacks are not irrelevant.
“So may the outward shows be least themselves.
The world is still deceived with ornament."
-William Shakespeare
»
- 23106 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
re: "Iran, governed by a delusional crowd"
There's an even more delusional crowd in Tel Aviv...not to mention the District of Columbia.
Nobody will attack Israel: if anybody do it, there is the Samson Option ready...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option
They will self destruct and implode on themselves, that would be a blessing to the world, if Israel vanished and remained a distant memory.
The world will go on without them, just hope Bernanke buys a new yarmulke in Tel Aviv when that happens.
+1000
Implode on themselves? No. They would use all their nukes and take out every last Muzzie population center on earth. Israel would save the last few for the Muzzie invaders inside their own country. The Israelis wouldn't get out (unless they developed teletransporters), but neither would the Muzzies. A billion Muzzies would die with Israel.
Now if Israel could teleport its population to a distant planet during the Sampson War, that would make for a very cool sci-fi story. The surviving Muzzies would be hunting down the Israelis forever.
Right... and the rest of the world would just stand still aside, watching in awe as they'd screw the planet...
Also, there's about 1.6 billion "muzzies" in the world and will be about 2.2 billion by 2030... and arabs are just a tiny minority - most of them are out of reach, too: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BDLxUd5CMAAsIoO.jpg
Is this the same mark grant that has predicted the collapse of almost all the big banks in the Europe PIIGS? The wizard is getting rusty and spewing out some military propaganda about capabilities he has probably very little intelligence info about.
He should stick to making bad calls on economic developments in Europe.
Gimme the beat boys and save my soul
I wanna get lost in your rock and roll
and drift away......
+1
Damn...I love that song.
just drift away...bitchez.
If I was the DinnahJacket, I would place a quick call to O'Bammer and tell him he can kiss the Straits of Hormuz goodbye if he doesn't rein in Netenyahu.
There is nothing in the rules to say you have to respond to provocation in a direct manner.
Problem with American foreign policy since a century ago. No idea the implications of any decision or action. Always surprised, always clumsy.
That might be a threat that Iran couldn't carry out. As far as I know, much of the US floating hardware in the Gulf is there precisely to prevent Iran from sinking some old junk in the Straits of Hormuz to block it. Thus any ship/boat that approaches the Straits that is not immediately identified is dealt with before it can cause a problem.
Those big fat slow supertankers wouldn't last long against the Russian missile and torpedoes that Iran possesses.
The big picture here is that the Rothschild zionists (not Jews) that control the west are facing a rising threat from the east led by China. Their response includes trying to gain control over the world's energy supplies. Overthrowing independant governments in Iraq, Libya and now Syria are all part of this plan and General Wesley Clark publicly acknowledged this and said that Iran was also on the list. What is going on with Israel attacking Syria is a sign of the frustration within the Rothschild led cabal that Assad has clung on to power. The risk of retaliation is not so much from Syria or even Iran but that Russia and China and the US get drawn into an all out war. This means the Israelis are in a much more dangerous space than most realise as they really do risk annihilation if they keep doing this.
Let's just hope then they keep doing this (and that the innocent israeles manage to escape and that all the zionists have a common Bar Mitzvah at the day of reckoning.)
Who?!, Can argue, with the chosen people!
¡¿Quién?!, puede argumentar, con el pueblo elegido! ...
The revolution may not be televised, but WWIII apparently will.
"In the military nothing is done without a strategy, generally planned well in advance,
US attacked Iraq with no plan for after in place.
Why would US care what happens in Syria? No gold.
The same bright military that carefully chose the Air Force guy to be their sexual assault "expert".
"Iran, engaged in so many lies about its nuclear production that some divinity could not sort them out, continues to exhale its perjury."
Proof?
"The United States, European allies and even Israel generally agree on three things about Iran's nuclear program: Tehran does not have a bomb, has not decided to build one, and is probably years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead."
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/23/us-iran-usa-nuclear-idUSBRE82M...
This leaves one to wonder, how the so-called "analyst" came to his conclusions.
A lot of people seem to talk about the motivations for the 2003 invasion of Iraq and how all that was based on farcical evidence. To my knowledge, not a single person has yet acknowledged that the spy satellite photos of the large Iraqi forces build-up on the Saudi border were also questionable.
So USA gets involved in the 1991 war based on spy satellite images that only Dick Cheney has seen (Russian spy satellite photos showed no evidence of this build up):
http://www.representativepress.org/LiesAboutIraq.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_%28testimony%29
and got involved in the 2003 invasion based on flimsy evidence that no one can be blamed for. Quite funny that people made fun of Bush for this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgPY1adc0A
Shame on who indeed?
The Israeli strike is exceptionally significant. The FSA publicly made a pledge of aleigance to Al-Qaeda:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-sponsored-syria-opposition-declares-alle...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22095099
The fact that the US, Europe and Israel are supporting and arming the very same organization they have allegedly been at war with is not irrelevant at all.
Let us ignore all the evidence of nano-thermate found in the 9-11 dust and let us set aside the many inconcsistencies in the 9-11 official narrative. But correct me if I'm wrong, is it just me, or is the NWO giving logistical support to the very people that hate you for your freedoms (whatever is left of them anyway)?
The Jews are now backing al Qaeda against Assad, so it is obvious that they backed al Qaeda on 9-11. Or, is this a "new and improved, friendlier al Qaeda" that the Jews are currently supporting?
A/C carriers are expected to last just long enough to laumch the first strike and then goodbye. Israel has guys who ride motorcycles and put magnetic bombs on cars .... just ask irans nuke program how effective that is. Israel can keep a secret.... unlike the USA. We have no cognizant foreign policy other than obama's support for the muslim brotherhood. Hence we had the Benghazi 9/11 hit with no response. If oabma told the truth that it was al queda that did Benghazi then how coudl he justify supporting them in syria? .. jet fighters to Egypt and secretly arming and providing ground advisors with al queda in syria and training marshalling facilities in Jordan. Weapons shipments via ship from lybia via turkey and Qatar and money from the Sauds. Israel rightfully doesn't trust obama and kerry is a clown just like hillary was. her high moment was ass bumping with some africans drinking beer. Dont forget obama's secret promise to putin... obama leads with his bendover behind from behind. al queda in syria said clearly give us arms.. thank you , becasue when we finish in syria we are coming after the USA. So obama is essentially arming our enemies just like we did with bin laden in afghanistan. He supports the caliphate agenda. Isn't aiding and abetting the enemy during wartime TREASON? iS THAT WHY WE ARE NO LONGER "AT WAR WITH AL QUEDA".. some day when it is too late we will undersstand obama's secret agenda to take down the USA.
Your post makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6v6kF8i-mbw as of 33.55 : see how Jewish are living without problems in Iran. Check out the whole documentary to have a better view about the real life in Iran.
Whatever...Israel's in a box FOREVER...enjoy!
Israel has nothing to fear from Syria? What about chemical weapons like sarin gas? The real nightmare scenario is if the fucking lunatic muslims get control of these weapons-they have no qualms about shooting them into Israel.
C'mon Tyler, get real.
Israel needs to worry more about Putin dropping a 75 mega-ton thermo nuke on its head and putting an end to this madness once and for all. The whole world is sick and tired of Israel.
Which only makes attacking the Alawites a "genius" play (similar to attacking Lebanon in 2006, but probably for worse)...
There is a major offensive in Syria going on
Syria gov + Hezbollah in fact cut off Insurgents from any supplies from Lebanon
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qusayr_offensive
Also in the south Syrian army is in process of winning and cutting off major supplies from Jordan.
You apparently think the Israelis are clever devils and the Iranians are ignorant bozos. Wrong. Bibi and his clan are racist ass clowns. A Persian nation has, and will, exist long after Israel has disappeared from existance. And good riddance to Israel I say.
What I worry about is when Israel collapses, all the "Israeli Jews" will come running here to the United States. We all ready have more than we can handle running Wall Street, Washington D.C, and the media. Maybe we could give them a homeland in Antarctica. Does the Talmud say anything bad about penguins? Are they considered an "unclean animal"?
...ummmmm... persians>khazarians... persians ARE semitic... ashkenazi khazarians ARE NOT...khazarians=less trustworthy gypsies...
Sooner or later Iran will attack Israel. My guess is a little radio station just across the border in Israel could be attacked by Iranians in uniform?
The worst geopolitical article ever seen on ZH. Sets a new standard in dumb and transparent bias together with insane "references" to Shakespeare, Dali, Escher and Orwell without a single clue.
Dear Mr.Grant. Please Fuck Off forever and take your zionist apologist bullshit with you.
Right, every time Israel bombs and invades others it is the victim? I've seen a lifetime of that insane nonsense. Nobody buys that crap any more.
The botched attempted invasion/border war in the USA, by Bush/Soetoro/Holder/CIA with the intent of imposing martial law, enforced by plundering blue helmet rape gangs, is not irrelevant. Congress and all our security forces did nothing
Israel "cannot" have a nuclear-armed Iran? That it is a given that Iran would use a nuclear weapon against Israel is absurd. If Iran were truly bent on nuking Israel, it could have much more easily purchased them on the black market rather than build significant infrastructure and endure economic sanctions as it has for the better part of a decade. India "can" and does live with a nuclear Pakistan who is just as much of a "mortal enemy" as Iran is to Israel and is far closer geographically. South Korea "can" and does live with a nuclear North who is far more belligerent than Iran. The truth is the "will not" part as in Israel will not live with a nuclear Iran because Israel will no longer have a military hegemony in the region. Nukes give the ability to resist. Chips on the table. Nothing more nothing less. That is what Isreal "will not" live with.
"Anciently, the first casualty of war is truth."
J.K. Galbraith (1975), Money: Whence it Came and Where it Went.
You mispelled Israel...
'T.Hobbes- the Wizard- W.Shakespeare Triology '
'a canard stuff'd with flagrant duress is a proxy's recipe... so diabolical as to foment the insatiable appetite for a seven-fold caravan of lifes dealiest sins, never impeded by a arrid oasis of debauchery...
a nacissistic,moral and ethical kibbutz slanged by a bellicose iconoclast collective, lost forever in perpetual entropy...
a self-mutilated cyclops dueling in a myoptic sphere of hermeneutic dichotomy, and yet the illusive ides-of-march, the crowning ornament of immolated justice... again, and again triumphantly celebrating the reincarnation of hubris, pride, greed and narcissistic hedonism upon the aaronian`golden calf' of secular shibboleth, adorned in a perpetuated never-moar later-day calvinism...
where`judas, virtue's, and ornament's', are all but diabolically preordained philanthropy's... a collage of despodic-nihilistic humanities... a man-made gift-- wrapped in a crafted diety of deception,... lost upon an illicit satan's realm, of soul-searching-inequities for ever-moar?'