This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
IRS Conservative Witchhunt Started In 2011 With High-Level Officials Involved
The IRS conservative targeting scandal is going from bad to worse.
Following the Friday revelations that despite all prior appeals to the contrary, the IRS did in fact apply political bias and prejudice in targeting conservative groups who had applied for exempt status (and who knows what other prejudice when targeting non-liberals entities - perhaps it is time to do an analysis of what the ratio of conservatives to liberals audited each year is?), culminating with the farcical response by an IRS official during the Friday press meeting...
In her defense, the IRS official, explained: "I'm a lawyer."
— Zachary A. Goldfarb (@Goldfarb) May 10, 2013
The operative question to the IRS official is: What is one-quarter of 300?
— Zachary A. Goldfarb (@Goldfarb) May 10, 2013
... this may be just the beginning of a major political scandal which in addition to tangential fallout crushing the alleged "impartiality" of the Obama administration, additionally validates many of the heretofore right-wing "conspiracy theories." And as Zero Hedge has shown time and again, it is not a conspiracy theory if it is a conspiracy fact.
What makes things worse for the IRS, the US Treasury, its then-head Tim Geithner, and of course, Barack Obama, is that according to a draft report prepared by the Treasury Department's inspector general for tax administration, expected to be released this week, and seen by AP, is that senior IRS officials knew agents were targeting tea party groups as early as the spring/summer of 2011, well before the 2012 election as we announced before. What makes matters worse, is that it was not only "low-level" employees as the IRS tried to justify its prejudice on Friday, but high level personnel, among which at least one head of division that oversees tax-exempt organizations, and likely all the way to the very top, that were well aware of the witch hunt.
The IRS apologized Friday for what it acknowledged was "inappropriate" targeting of conservative political groups during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status. The agency blamed low-level employees, saying no high-level officials were aware.
But on June 29, 2011, Lois G. Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt organizations, learned at a meeting that groups were being targeted, according to the watchdog's report. At the meeting, she was told that groups with "Tea Party," ''Patriot" or "9/12 Project" in their names were being flagged for additional and often burdensome scrutiny, the report says. The 9-12 Project is a group started by conservative TV personality Glenn Beck.
Lerner instructed agents to change the criteria for flagging groups "immediately," the report says.
Attempts by the IRS to contain the fallout to lower level employees will become very complicated once it becomes public knowledge, that "on Aug. 4, 2011, staffers in the IRS' Rulings and Agreements office "held a meeting with chief counsel so that everyone would have the latest information on the issue.""
So everyone knew about it.
But this is a very sticky problem because at a congressional hearing March 22, 2012, IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman, who had previously stated on the record that no groups had been targeted, testified under oath as follows: "There's absolutely no targeting. This is the kind of back and forth that happens to people" who apply for tax-exempt status, Shulman said at the House Ways and Means subcommittee hearing."
Oops.
Of course, the IRS is scrambling to contain the fallout in the only way it (and JPMorgan, and Goldman Sachs, and every other organization caught with its pants down) knows - the news never got to the top:
"IRS senior leadership was not aware of this level of specific details at the time of the March 2012 hearing," the statement said. "The timeline does not contradict the commissioner's testimony. While exempt organizations officials knew of the situation earlier, the timeline reflects that IRS senior leadership did not have this level of detail."
Lerner's position is three levels below the commissioner.
"The timeline supports what the IRS acknowledged on Friday that mistakes were made," the statement continued. "There were not partisan reasons behind this."
What makes it even worse is that it was not just some radical conservative groups that had been targeted.
On Jan, 25, 2012, the criteria for flagging suspect groups was changed to, "political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding Government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform/movement," the report says.
So, by implication those who still believe in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are if not enemies of the US, then certainly subject to far more scrutiny by the country's tax collectors?
Needless to say, the fury among republicans in Congress is palpable:
Rep. Charles Boustany, R-La., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee's oversight subcommittee, said the report "raises serious questions as to who at IRS, Treasury and in the administration knew about this, why this practice was allowed to continue for as long as it did, and how widespread it was."
"This timeline reveals at least two extremely unethical actions by the IRS. One, as early as 2010, they targeted groups for political purposes. Two, they willfully and knowingly lied to Congress for years despite being aware that Congress was investigating this practice," Boustany said.
"This is an outrageous abuse of power. Going after organizations for referencing the Bill of Rights or expressing the intent to make this country a better place is repugnant," Boustany added. "There is no excuse for this behavior."
The White House, which would not want to touch this issue with a three trillion foot pole has logically distanced itself as far as possible:
On Friday, White House spokesman Jay Carney said the administration expected the inspector general to conduct a thorough investigation, but he brushed aside calls for the White House itself to investigate.
However, one can be certain that with the ascendent GOP, smarting after a year of political debacles and strategic disasters, and feeling emboldened in the aftermath of the Benghazi scandal coverup which in itself is another slap in the face of the "most transparent administration" in history, that the scandal will not be contained to some low-level, Fabrice Tourre-wannabe. Unless of course both the right and the left were in on it. After all, Shulman was appointed by President George W. Bush. His 6-year term ended in November.
Which, of course, would mean that for all the theatrics and optics, both the right and the left are, indeed, one.
»
- 35679 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
OK, let's get more specific. My assertion would be that corporations are running the show.
Let's take Obummer-care. Would you say 'liberals' are the big beneficiaries or Big Pharma and privatized health corporations? Granted, so called 'liberals' were the useful idiots.
So called liberals being the operative word.
The group described were and are socialists/communists at the base level...just like what we've been saying...FOR YEARS!
I swear to God its like us saying, we're going to beat our fist on the table until it bleeds and socialists saying it can never actually bleed because we fixed it by fiat to where thats impossible and we must be delusional.
Two completely different thought patterns and only one is reality.
Liberals still claim obozocare is the best thing since sliced bread
You work for George Soros right?
How much money has he funneled to Obama?
You are concerned about the money right?
And your post was not about R v D bullshit or am I missing something?
It's about corporations, the new 'people', dontcha' know. Not R or D...just $,
Just how did the Koch Brothers coop the Tea Party? Curious minds want to know.
Google on "Koch Brothers" + "Tea Party" and you will find articles like this one:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brendan-demelle/study-confirms-tea-party-_...
Fairness in media? Like MSNBC, NY Times, LA Times, CNBC, NBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, Current TV etc are all anti-obama? LOL you 0bots crack me up with your delusions.
Obama raised a record amount of campaign donations in both 2008 and 2012. Obama has more lobbyists and former Wall Streeters in the White House than any prior president.
You mention the Koch brothers, what about George Soros, Mark Suckerberg and dozens of billionaires giving to democrats? That must be fine and dandy to you because they are billionaires on your side.
THEY have no legitimacy. STARVE THE BEAST!
Football season won't be here for another couple of months;
the thunder surrounding the Boston bombing has died down;
time for another distraction.
Syria.
The IRS cashes my checks before I mail them. If I mail a check without a stamp, they take care of it. They are so understanding and kind.
Joke: Those of the US government are targeting political rivals and enemies.
Punchline: "...land of the free, home of the brave..." LOL
hujel
IRS Commissioner Dodges Income Tax Question - No Law!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu0iSxAKxT0 (4:29)
Watergate started out as a routine burglary by low-level 'plumbers.'
Then it turned out to be directed straight from the Oval Office.
'Low level bureaucrats' do not initiate wide-ranging campaigns, using major resources, with explosive political consequences.
That stuff invariably is ordered by the office where the buck stops.
The Kenyan guy is not a rank amateur like Nixon was. It will take a lot of defectors to track it back to the cause. Plus Nixon had no drones.
Nixon was cheating (recording) during an election campaign to get info on the other side to help his election. He wasn'T covering up a fucking murder. I don't know why people even try to equate the two.
Equating means minimizing...
DaddyO
"He wasn'T covering up a fucking murder."
Except maybe that it would open up "That whole Bay of Pigs thing."
Yeah you never know. What I do know is there's absolutely no limit to what liberals will excuse in defense of their team. Including murder. Circle the wagons bitches.
Liberals are "compassionate" hence their actions must always be excused.
As long as we are caught in the liberal/conservative republican/democrat left/right blah/blah distraction, we lose focus.
It's the banks.
It's the banks.
It's the banks.
Well it was 'liberals' like Wayne Morse of Oregon who voted against the Gulf of Tonkin resolution and 'liberal' Frank Church of Idaho whose investigations in the 70s let us know that the CIA already had a microphone up our collective asses.
Conversely, the war mongering, constitution hating Lindsay Graham of South Carolina (beautiful state, BTW) is a self indentified 'conservative'.
Just sayin' labels can be counter-productive.
We watch what they DO, not what they SAY they are.
Learn some real history. "That whole Bay of Pigs thing" occurred under John Fitzgerald Kennedy (a Democrat), who was succeeeded by Lydon Baynes Johnson (a Democrat), who was followed by Nixon. Trying to stick Nixon with the Bay of Pigs, or indeed Vietnam, both initiated under JFK is risible.
I was quoting Nixon, numb nuts. It's understood by many that he was refering to the murder of JFK. Secondly, JFK had withdrawal from Vietnam on his agenda, in memoranda. LBJ was totally corrupt and gave the MIC exactly what it wanted. Kellog, Brown and Root, now Haliburton -- BIG beneficiaries for war construction -- was a Democrat contributor before they swung to the Republicans. And Nixon, he expanded into Cambodia and left POWs abandoned at the end.
Because progressive do not give a flying fuck when four government employess are killed. They do not even try to fiind the sucmbags who did it.
Progessive have weird value systems.
The Kenyan has the whole fucking press to cover his ass.
While the MSM will do anything for Obama, Obama wants the audits to be publicized. He wants people to know and fear his power. Obama is the last president this country will elect.
Hey deadfred,
Nixon also did NOT have the media giving him daily blow, hand or rim jobs.
False. It was never "directed straight from the Oval Office". But Nixon tried to cover it up and his Oval Office tapes showed him ordering the coverup, not the break in. It was the coverup that got him into trouble.
I for one, yearn for the honesty of the Nixon Administration.
A veritable Saint in comparison to Obozo, and his minions, and Nixon
surely was no saint..
A real President in the Beige House, who gave a shit about the country, and it's security and integrity, and peace and laws would have come straight out personally and thoroughly condemned such behaviors, and demanded a major investigation and scalps/resignations, and impeachment of those at the very top of the IRS, plus consideration of serious charges (along the lines of the treason thematic). Can you imagine how this has poisoned the well now? Unbelievable!
DON'T PAY
It's going to be another Watergate.
Yes. Watch this space in 50 days.
This is Definately going to become a major scandal.
Read it . . .
. . . and weep.
The ONLY way this becomes a Watergate style event, is if they plan to use it to distract the masses from the BANK HEIST going on??? Maybe TPTB would rather Obama or Hillary take one for the team politically, than use another 9/11 style false flag? IF it was a false flag; as I have begrudgingly come to believe.
Knowledge is power, and it will be worth more than gold in the coming days, months and years...
Bath House better remember, in the long run, he means nothing to Them if knocking him off serves another, higher purpose of perfidy.
I hope he has good bodyguards. Who wants to see another president shot, even if they are puppets?
Nope.
See whatistaxed.com
Fuck the IRS!
Talk about fucking nuts. While the evidence points to going after conservatives, what is shown above is tantamount to almost anyone under the sun when you have expanding and limiting gov't as a reason to go after them. Almost like it allows whatever party in power to attack the other side. Which at this point means having the focus of going after conservatives. But who knows perhaps they targeted all sides. Whatever the case is doesn't matter, the simple fact that they would approach it in this manner is beyond sickening.
Glass-Steagall
"But who knows perhaps they targeted all sides."
Yeah you never know. Maybe they went after liberals too but the MSM is keeping that quite. Idiots.
Yeah, I'm sure they were all over ACORN and Media Matters...lol.
Are you referring Gyorgy Schwartz's Fecal Matters in DC?
That would be the one ;-)
Read up peoples!!!! They were hunting Ron Paul types on behalf of the GOP/DEM and of course the FED/RES!!!!
BINGO!
This was a win/win for the establishment :-)
TPTB gonna need bodyguards for the rest of their lives. They better get good ones and pay 'em well.
A study of history will show that many assassinations were done by a bodyguard. There can be motivations other than money which can be leveraged (family, clan or religious revenge). Or payment in things other than money (land, power). Or just a bigger stack of gold and gems than the target will pay.
Now let's consider Bitcoin with regards to assassination. An anonymous payment system. Payment would not need to come from a single source. Crowdfunding. The rest is left as an exercise for the reader.
End the Fed and the IRS, 1913 was a bad year.
The origin of the income tax on individuals is generally cited as the passage of the 16th Amendment, passed by Congress on July 2, 1909, and ratified February 3, 1913;
Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve Act (ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251, enacted December 23, 1913, 12 U.S.C. ch. 3)
Gotta get rid of the 17th amendment, first. Use that as a blueprint to repeal the 16th. The states need to demand the seats at the table that are rightfully theirs.
16th Amendment was never ratified.
http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/
On January 10, 2008, the Federal District Court in Chicago issued a permanent injunction against Bill Benson on the grounds that by offering information demonstrating that the 16th Amendment was not legally ratified, he was promoting an abusive tax shelter. The Court then refused to look at the government-certified documentary evidence, deciding instead that the facts necessary to prove his statements true were "irrelevant."
What has America come to when the government we created to protect our rights can accuse us of lying and then prohibit us from presenting a defense in a court of law?
. . .
Watch the Benson Video
The Premise
The federal government rests its authority to collect income tax on the 16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution—the federal income tax amendment—which was allegedly ratified in 1913.
"The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
—The 16th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America
After an extensive year-long nationwide research project, William J. Benson discovered that the 16th Amendment was not ratified by the requisite three-fourths of the states and that nevertheless Secretary of State Philander Knox had fraudulently declared ratification.
It was a shocking revelation; it reached deep to the core of our American system of government.
The Discovery
Article V of the U.S. Constitution defines the ratification process and requires three-fourths of the states to ratify any amendment proposed by Congress. There were fourty-eight states in the American Union in 1913, meaning that affirmative action of thirty-six was necessary for ratification. In February 1913, Secretary of State Philander Knox proclaimed that thirty-eight had ratified the Amendment.
In 1984 Bill Benson began a research project, never before performed, to investigate the process of ratification of the 16th Amendment. After traveling to the capitols of the New England states and reviewing the journals of the state legislative bodies, he saw that many states had not ratified. He continued his research at the National Archives in Washington, D.C.; it was here that Bill found his Golden Key.
This damning piece of evidence is a sixteen-page memorandum from the Solicitor of the Department of State, among whose duties is the provision of legal opinions for the Secretary of State. In this memorandum, the Solicitor lists the many errors he found in the ratification process.
These four states are among the thirty-eight from which Philander Knox claimed ratification:
California: The legislature never recorded any vote on any proposal to adopt the amendment proposed by Congress.
Kentucky: The Senate voted on the resolution, but rejected it by a vote of nine in favor and twenty-two opposed.
Minnesota: The State sent nothing to the Secretary of State in Washington.
Oklahoma: The Senate amended the language of the 16th Amendment to have a precisely opposite meaning.
Bill would like to thank those who've contributed or shown support in the fight against fraudulent taxation. Click here to help.
When his project was finished at the end of 1984, Bill had visited the capitol of every state from 1913 and knew that not a single one had actually and legally ratified the proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution. Thirty-three states engaged in the unauthorized activity of altering the language of an amendment proposed by Congress, a power that the states do not possess.
Since thirty-six states were needed for ratification, the failure of thirteen to ratify was fatal to the Amendment. This occurs within the major (first three) defects tabulated in Defects in Ratification of the 16th Amendment. Even if we were to ignore defects of spelling, capitalization and punctuation, we would still have only two states which successfully ratified.
Death and taxes... and presbyopia...
This has to be a bunch of hooey because the MSM has told me time and time again that obama's shit doesn't stink and that our govt is the greatest thing since sliced heads.
Most-Transparent-Administration-Evah!
I say there boy, about as transperant as tinfoil...
DaddyO
lol...all in how one percieves transparency.
Forced consumer "buy in" on health insurance, even after Heller vs DC they still going after the Second Amendment, green energy cronyism, corporate jets=bad/Air Force One=good...it starts to be a long list after five years ;-)
It's extremely transparent.
How much more transparency do you need to figure out the regime is a stinking, putrid, festering cesspool of corruption?
If anything, I think we could use more meat curtains to hide exactly what 'is' going on.
Sorry for being a contrarian dickhead.
The bigger scandal is that it took 2 years to make it public.
The ``journalists`` aren't doing their job. I'm sure a lot of them knew of it/reported on it but it was censored/ignored.
They were sleeping with the IRS officials.
Nuf said.
2 fucking years,
The "journalists" are doing the job they're being paid for.
What they don't do is journalism.
This is hilarious: it's almost as if Americans don't all know how power operates. Hint: they do it to the "radical" Greens, Anarchists, Occupy people as well. It's a standard way of ruling. And you believe the nonsense that gets in the MSM when it happens or the lies they print about "the dirty hippies"? Your political flavor doesn't matter at all.
I'm reminded of a personal story: A while back, the Pro-Hunting lobby in the UK went to London to protest. (Picture many landed gentry and burly farriers descending on London in tweed). I went to them and outlined the numerous tactics that the radical left had learnt from protests, and warned them about police violence and agitators. They were outraged! The police would never do such a thing to them!
When blood was spilt and the police pushed back hard, they were shocked, shocked, shocked!
Welcome to the desert of the real.
We do know it perfectly well.
I like you, man.
False flag suspending what's left of the constitution in 4...4....3..2...
So Obummer has a secret meeting with the bankers, then a secret meeting with the energy companies, followed up by a secret meeting with the press. That tells me something shitty is coming our way.
And . . . then what?
Get your house in order. If you're a father, step up and lead by example... no more excuses for any of us! Live as Jesus did and you'll be OK. Or, choose another route of salvation; but to rely completely upon humanity for "collective salvation" is looking kind of shitty right about now.
What a despicable group of trash in DC. Nothing surprises me at all. What were you people thinking when you elected this man?
I was thinking, whoop ya baby, gonna get me an Obamaphone.
IRS needs to watch porn. Sressed out fuckers.
Shut the fuckers down
Repealing the 17th amendment, and then the 16th, would go a long way toward resurrecting the Republic.
Too few understand the insidious 17th
The states need to demand the seats at the table that are rightfully theirs.
It is impossible for a national deomcracy to survive.
O'Bummer is getting 'watergated' for not escalating the wars in Syria, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, China, Iceland, Utah, Brazil, Canada and Mexico............
ps........I love the IRS, the CIA, the Russian Mafia, Israel, the NeoCons, all war-mongering homosexual US Senators, the Rothschilds and all money-printing Central Bankers.........
Nice /s DCG. Maybe we should invent something like the Cockneys used in the UK - code talk for all verboten words.
Classic.
Are there more millionaire Dem Senators or Rep Senators?
END THE FUCKING FED.
take that and shove it up your asses obama fans! some more of your fucking hope and change! what will come up next? god helps us!
Look up Kent State, you muppet. They kill hippies too if they get uppity, and don't ever ask about how it is to be black.
COMEDY GOLD IN THIS THREAD.
Speaking of being "black"...at the risk of being banned for life as a razzzist...lol...what is the black youth unemployment rate these days under The One?
50% ?
Latest BLS stats I could find had the unemployment rate at 28.6% (age 16-24) v. 17.1% overall. These are from 2012 though.
Thats what I've read as well. Its a travesty.
Moar amnesty & immigration!...lets drown this puppy ;-)
I thought you were cleverer than that nmewn.
Look up the % in prison, and then look at the financial benefits said workers provide. Uncle Sam gets his (low tech) military gear not from Chinese labor but from Black Prison Labor.
If you want to posture as an anarchist, wise up.
Nice deflection of reality and I never said I was an anarchist or even postured as one, is it the avatar that has you confused?
There is a real difference between a less bloated federal government invading the lives of the people who comprise the individual states and anarchy.
Try the red herring again though...its delicious.
Actually, I do apologize, sincerely. I had you pegged as a radical AnCap, and thought that was your bag.
I take back the posturing accusation, it wasn't applicable, and my criticism (hypocrisy) doesn't stand. (As stated: I don't care what your beliefs are, as long as you're true to them). Self-junk applied.
Accepted.
People are often confused about what V was (as depicted) and stood for and against. He was against government oppression, the rise of an Orwellian state and for freedom of the individual.
Kinda like "teabaggers" ;-)
Yeah, AnCaps are so 'radical', you know, what with their stance of individualism and minding one's own business, and everything being done voluntarily. /s
Any flavor of "Anarchist" is radical to most people caught in the web, and who believe the tripe that it means Kaos, not simply "no rulers".
And yes, I've read them all.
I might even be one.
Could care less what "ism" may or may not apply to you, AEM.
All I can say is you have a mind that is an absolute pleasure to behold. I mean it. You've really pointed me in directions I had no idea existed and I thank you for that. ( I'm not lazy but I sure appreciate the hyperlinks too)
And I thought I had things worked out so cleanly...
And exact ditto to mnewn. I've held you in silent high regard since I landed here. Probably a good time to speak up about it.
Nice to also see the two of you set an excellent example of how to interact like a pair of grow ups in a misunderstanding.
Didn't have to call each other beaks, coons or zipperheads either.
There's a chance we could shake this shit off after all.
You three should get a room. How do you say "Ménage à trois" in french?
I fart in your general direction.
One thing about AEM, he (or she) always makes you think in broader terms.
Its not that I don't understand anarchism (I certainly do) its that it, in my opinion, it will always fracture as a sociatel model due to its very nature...that is, no long term cohesion among its members varying desires & goals, aside from the knowledge that the state is long term deleterious to personal freedom.
Our founders were certainly aware of the concept of anarchy (they were well read) but opted for a system of checks & balances on the state, which over time, have now been eroded to our detriment...Ben Franklin, "A republic, if you can keep it."
The analogy I like to use of my perception of government (any government) is this...it is like the biggest, meanest pit bull you've ever seen in your life, frothing at the mouth, straining on a leash held by us.
If the leash is too long, the dog will attack anyone around the master, keep it short and the dog has value and the leash holders always need to be us.
I'm just a capitalist who believes everybody should keep the fruits of their labors, and thus there should be NO taxation. Taxation explicitly means force, and it is nothing but theft. It's someone else deciding what is 'good' for me.
In the wild, someone else will always decide what's best for you, unless you are the one at the top of the heap. There is no time in recorded history where masses of people were not ruled by someone and his goons.
muppet? I dont play the goldman and jp you stinking pog and as for kent state, been there fool! ask how it is to be black? I dont give a rats ass how it is to be black, from you comments if you are black you don't know what is to be black! I dont care what fucking color our president is, most of our former presidents are your muppets! present one included!
Give into the anger.
You're being groomed for a Fascist State, and if you respond to this post with hate, you're making it certain. They need an angry arms-bearing fall guy. Look up what happened to the SA within Nazi Germany, if you need historical reference. The Brown Shirts (largely drawn from the lower classes) were purged once they'd fulfilled their role. That's the "Tea Party / Patriots" funded by Koch, if you've missed it.
No-one in power or with money gives a fuck about you. Stop believing in the propaganda. That includes all the media you're listening to.
old news, already know what's going on! your late to the party...
No, I'm pointing out why "OBAMA IS EVUL" is pathetic.
Bush was just as bad, as was Reagan, as was Clinton and so on and so forth.
Moral relativism. Sure.
Oh dear. Someone knows nothing about power. Take these two pictures:
First one, they don't like Carter (due to him critiquing the policies of encumbants, it's just not done - the tell is the shoes)
Second one, look how Carter and Michelle are being snubbed / aren't part of the group
Grow the fuck up, and learn your basics of hierarchical social structure body language. You know nothing at this point.
p.s. The junks are just pure music to my eyes. It's people unable to free themselves and putting imaginary internet points on their inability to process reality. You're only judging yourself when you junk btw.
there ya go amrka, there's yer paid figureheads.
buncha
Why would anyone care what Michelle has to say? Did they give Hillary or Nancy anymore of an ear? What has this got to do though with an opinion that Obama is an evil political Alynski prick?
Now, Carter is simply thanking everyone he sees that a president more useless than he came along.
Again, you know nothing about power.
If you've ever wondered why the original Star Wars trilogy was any good, and the new three were terrible, I suggest you look into Lucas' wife, and her influence.
There's a very frail balance that's done between Males with Power and the Females who they breed with. Oh, and it's very real.
I see both sides. Hybrid mule indeed ~ no, something more.
You fail to even follow the argument and therefore you have been exposed.
learn your basics of hierarchical social structure body language
bingo. anyone who is pickin up what Ax is puttin down should watch the dedication ceremony for the bush library. says all ya need to know right there.
Aurora Ex Machina,
~//~
Pay Your Income Tax: 1943 Disney Propoganda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00u6qUelp6c (7:22)
The Income Tax: WWII Disney Propaganda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqMVpcbhpqw (5:41)
Oh... I'm well aware of Disney and Fascism. He created the plastic reality that was passed as the real. [Do a Grep, ffs]
You have no idea what you're talking about with Kent State. Those were 6 college aged kids protesting the Vietnam war who were killed by a trigger happy National Guard. It had nothing to do with uppity.
Well done, you've failed. There was a paid FBI informant on site with a gun (none of the students had them), three/four shots were fired at the Guard before the order was given to fire back (even with the flowers-in-the-barrel), and it's all on tape. Want me to drag out the other instances where power used force against the populace? Hint: look up the UK anti-Vietnam protests.
And if you want to look over the serious concerns of power over popular protest, just listen to the Nixon tapes over Black people revolting in urban groups. There's an entire GOP strategy designed around it, ffs. (ALL. ON. TAPE.)
Move group bombed in Philadelphia. You bombed your black people before Waco, muppet. You know nothing about power and how it sacrifices people. At least the Russians are aware enough to see when they were getting fucked.
Salute the Flag of the Free.
There is no proof of your nonsense and more an more you sound like an Obamabot Alynski.
***Nixon tapes over Black people revolting in urban groups***
Nixon and the Republicans were willing to fight the Communists down to the the last black person in the country.
Certainly, financial coercion is the primary weapon of coercion wielded against the people and the states, by the central government.
Agree, but to what end? If we realize what motivates these scoundrels and what their end game is, then it becomes obvious this is not a dem-rep, left-right, cons-lib struggle, but it is a struggle between a people that wish to be free and left alone and those who wish to enslave and control for the sake of power. Same battle as it ever was, at least since Nimrod.
Identifying the problem is the first step to fixing it, IMO. Takes time to sort out solutions, that's for sure.
As I see it right now, repealing the 17th amendment and the 16th amendment would do wonders for the Republic.
Yes, anyone reading the Constitution will have to agree that it was written in a way that limits the reach of the Federal gov't and prescribed the gov't to protecting the people's natural rights. That is up until the 16th and 17th amendments, for these state what the gov't can do to us, thus changing the relationship between the people and the go'v. It's been downhill since, as this opened the door for abuse.
Since Nimrod, yes; and the motive has always been the same. People are either shepherd, sheep or wolf. We can each decide which one we are. Until 2008, I was a sheep. Now, I'm a shepherd for my family at least. And no, Obama's election didn't "wake me up"... it was the crash and then the "Reality PhD" I've earned from sites like ZH, Von Mises, Silverbear, Shadow Stats, Infowars, The Blaze, Huffington Post, The Onion... Snopes & Wiki-whatever.
The truth is there to see if one just looks close enough. There is plenty of misinformation and disinformation mixed in with the truth. When I'm wrong, I don't mind being corrected, as I learn from my mistakes.
People are either shepherd, sheep or wolf. We can each decide which one we are.
There is the fallacy pushed by some conservatives. Truth is, most cannot choose anything they were not born to.
A liberal believes that the best way to survive is in a collective that promotes liberal behaviors to the exclusion of all others.
A conservative believes that the best way to survive is in a collective that promotes conservative behaviors to the exclusion of all others.
An anarchist believes that the best way for the people to survive is for all to use their abilities as best they can in a voluntary manner.
It's important to keep in mind that private property, the family, and Christianity are the bases of Western civilization. It's also important to keep in mind that human nature is aggressive, selfish, and sinful.
While you may desire to voluntarily coexist with like-minded individuals in a utopian anarchic collective, that doesn't mean that Al Jihad is magically going to stop trying to cut your heads off.
If they ran the place like a business -- which is what it is supposed to be -- they go after ALL the fat cats (private and corporate) and rake them over the coals. Big animals hunt big game.
But after an organization of people reaches a certain size (I.e. Complexity), all the usual and rational behavior is off, as you get organizational Fiefdoms within a political global empire.
Welcome to Latter Day Rome. Where is Hannibal, or the Barbaric Relic Hordes?
Blue whales are filter feeders.
Bullseye!
I am a lawyer and not good at math …unless [err, uh, umm, coughs] we’re padding our clients billing hours.
- Lois Lerner, Senior IRS Official
Actually it goes like this:
Job interviewer: "How much is two and two?"
Lawyer: "How much do you want it to be?"
That's nothing. Just wait until it becomes obvious that Sandy Hook was Fast & Furious II.
And these very same fuckers are going to be policing Obamacare......
THIS IS A MUST READ: I AM THE REASON FOR THIS. MY NAME IS MICHAEL BERRY.
If I get 100 "ups" I will release every document I have. I have been waging WAR with this organization for over six years. These idiots have been thinking I have been conducting a "conventional war" while I have been crafting The Art of War. I kid you not. I am neither a Republican nor a Democrat. I am an american (little "a" was on purpose --- as it is with everything I do!) Just been waiting for the right moment. This is it.
Apparently the only thing worse than being in a party in or out of favor is directly telling the IRS "I want this matter resolved so I can renounce my citizenship." YOU will have to do your own research on that. So this part of this article is VERY TRUE:
"So, by implication those who still believe in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights are if not enemies of the US, then certainly subject to far more scrutiny by the country's tax collectors?" That would be me.
I filed a FOIA with Treasury (Case # 55-1212-0008-C) some time ago and a surprising amount of the information was redacted as well as be duplicative. Hmmmm. This was a test in the Art of War. So in addition to all the BS as to why they get to withhold my very own information much of the information, BOTH INTERNAL AND INTER-AGENCY, was redacted under FOIA subsection (b)(7)(C) which states: "permits an agency to withhold "information compiled for law enforcement purposes the release of which could reasonably to constitute invasion of personal privacy. READ THAT AGAIN. I AM THE ONE ASKING. GET IT! I have never hit, shot or threaten anyone - ever. I have used stupidity against itself.
A significant amount of my own information was redacted under FOIA subsection (b)(7)(F) -- "permits an agency to withhold information that could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of an individual." READ THAT AGAIN.
If you cross reference (b)(7)(F) with what constitutes a "terrorist" because I was DEFINITELY trying to "influence" a governmental agency I am a terrorist. I also believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Quite the conundrum you have to admit. All I was doing was trying to influence this agency to do the right thing.
I kid you not, the reason the two, armed Federal Agents came a knocking on my door was due to a FB post. The post was not political but was certainly profane.
They should be careful because I am watching while at the same time reading. Oh and I do have a couple of people watching my back! TEE FUCKING HEE. But now I need a lot more.
100 "ups" and I release everything. I promise.
If you don't hear from me again it is because I have been deemed an enemy of the state and can be detained/taken away without notification --- thank you Mr. McCain or I am dead. All is good.
HELP!
Simple response like "I've got your back" will scare the shit out them.
OK
UP 100+
Your move.
GOD DAMN IT I HAVE BEEN MOVING. It's called "charge". The only blanket of coverage I have left is widespread awareness. While I do appreciate the "UP 100+" that is not going to scare the shit out of them. "YOU NEED ME ON THAT WALL, YOU WANT ME ON THAT WALL!" I am more than willing to do this but I do need coverage in numbers!
iwantmycountryback.com
Up to 22, Tiger. Now go get 'em.
Ask for money if you need to. But, release the damn Kraken.
Put up or shut up.
Really, Put up or shut up. But I did like the Kraken reference, only my issue isn't limited to the Nordic regions. Unlike YOU fucking pussies I will put up. A certain news organization is already in contact. There will be no "shutting up" but there will be "putting up". Don't take this the wrong way but: FUCK YOU PUSSY!
^+100^ Does that count? Take a deep breath & relax. Don’t dl that shit here, head off to pastebin. Just advice.
Relax, really! I don't do relax there are far too many of you doing that. QUOTE: "JUST BECASUE YOU CHOOSE TO HAVE YOUR HEAD STUCK UP YOUR ASS IT DOES NOT MEAN MICHAEL BERRY WON'T COME BY AND KICK YOU IN THE ASS!" It's just a lot worse if you head happens to be there when I start kicking. I kick very, very hard!
While I don't relax I do laugh, quite a bit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zs8QKXtCN9w
Love,
Stehpan!
"The Lord tells me he can get me out of this mess, but you're fucked!"
Don't fucking post that shit here. Understood?
This isn't to difficult to track down mberry8870. By then, you'll have bigger problems to deal with. Get a grip on yourself. Go to bed and your be fine in the morning.
Do you want to play? Don't fucking post, really? I don't find you too smart. Do you think you are concealed by Atomizer? My guess is that you aren't pinging off multiple servers in various countries. So this is a real question: Would you like me to post your name, IP address, MAC address, the date you purchased the fucking thing your typing in? An apology is what is needed here or I make you infamous. If I don't post here where? I will go to bed and wake up in the morning. I expect an answer. You are not anonymous.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1UmHfWCw-4
I am serious, always.
I believe this administration is evil. Now tell me something I didn't already know.
People who believe in the US constitution are the enemy of this president and the nwo he represents. This president would rather run the coutry into the ground and dismiss the entire rule of law and constitution in the process in order to further the nwo. No law officer showing up at my door would change my mind on this because my opinion is based on their actions and not their words.
I forget to mention no less than six months ago nearly everyone on this site voted for Obama. Now, that's more shocking than anything I can say.
I sure as fuck NEVER voted for O'bomb-a.
All of my stuff is off-site already.
iwantmycountryback.com
STAND THE FUCK UP. I CAN'T DO THIS BY MYSELF. "Me I finish things!" "This is gonna get FUCKING ugly."
You should know by now that both parties have been hijacked. The "left" has spokes people who do not represent many of us who lean to the liberal side. We are not Pro Israel, Pro war, pro Monsanto, pro Obama. We just want the disadvantaged to not be persecuted for having been born into a life of despair, to give them half a chance to get out of there. Fairness, justice, logic - This is the liberal view.
Obamacare is a cull.
Gay rights is a form of categorizing the people as is legal marijuana. Lists are being made in the guise of generosity, I believe.
Redo your sight and mellow out. Moderate approach is needed to attract visitors. We are not crazy liberals, we have lost our voice. Bring in Agenda 21 material.
Put the rest on the back burner for now.
Hmmmmmmmmm -3. The IRS IS on this site.
Tyler and Marla:
Might I suggest you put my post right under your post PERMANATLY? it is that bad.
I assume -1 is an IRS person
removed
thank you
The Rise of the Pathologically Self-Absorbed has its implications.
It's a simple dynamic really, with the Self-Absorbed sycophantic force naturally providing cover as the Self-Absorbed Controller rises to lofty places.
As you see, We are Infested, top to bottom, bottom to top.
As you experience the fallout, and naturally ponder the Rule of Law, you have a Great Force in your way -- and it doesn't even know that it exists.
So does that mean you are going to sit?
Don't worry the MSM will take care of this... oh wait...
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/05/11/fox-abc-and-cbs-ne...
Presidents of ABC and CBS News Have Siblings Working at White House With Ties to Benghazi
Crony Capitalism at it's finest it is not just the banks along with the Treasury and regulation agencies like the the SEC but the White House and news organizations. No wonder the Oreo nevers gets any bad press in the MSM. I think it is time to burn the whole fucker down and start from scratch it would be easier than trying to untangle this whole interconnected crony marxist mess.
Biometric database of all adults hidden in immigration bill.
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/05/immigration-reform-dossiers/
OT: CBS News President David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes who is Obama's deputy national security advisor.
And, you can't make this up...Ben Rhodes has a Masters Degree in Fiction from NYU.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3018292/posts
Talk about a compromised Crony Media relationship with the White House in another lifetime this would be investigated and criminal charges brought forth.
"The brother of a top Obama administration official is also the president of CBS News, and the network may be days away from dropping one of its top investigative reporters for covering the administration’s scandals too aggressively. CBS News executives have reportedly expressed frustration with their own reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, who has steadily covered the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi terrorist attack in Libya since late last year...On Friday, ABC News reported that the Benghazi talking points went through 12 revisions before they were used on the public. The White House was intimately involved in that process, ABC reported, and the talking points were scrubbed free of their original references to a terror attack. That reporting revealed that President Obama’s deputy national security advisor, Ben Rhodes — brother of CBS News president David Rhodes — was instrumental in changing the talking points in September 2012. ABC’s reporting revealed that Ben Rhodes, who has a masters in fiction from NYU, called a meeting to discuss the talking points at the White House on September 15, 2012.
Well then. "CBS News executives" are wringing their hands that Sharyl Attkisson maybe "wading dangerously close" to advocacy on Benghazi. It's now entirely reasonable to ask if the top executive at the network may be "wading dangerously close" to a massive conflict of interest. Is David Rhodes trying to protect his brother -- who's just been revealed to be knee-deep in the Benghazi cover-up -- by muzzling and marginalizing a problematic journalist within his news division? Kudos to the Caller for shining the spotlight on that relationship, but it's amazing that no one connected those dots sooner. How many people in the elite MSM orbit are aware that Ben and David Rhodes are brothers? And they definitely are brothers, by the way; The New York Times confirmed that fact in a glowing profile of the younger Rhodes in March"
... the Benghazi talking points went through 12 revisions before they were used on the public.
... who's just been revealed to be knee-deep in the Benghazi cover-up ...
Care about the facts. Congressional leaders were invited to a meeting where the talking point revisions would be discussed. Republican leadership chose to not attend.
Sticking one's head in the sand by Party 1 does not make for a cover-up by Party 2.