The Holder - Issa Smackdown

Tyler Durden's picture

This was not your grandfather's hearing. The air was thick with partisanship already but when Darrell Issa began by playing audio of Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general for civil rights and President Barack Obama's nominee to become the next Secretary of Labor, in which he confirms that he is arranging for details relating to the St. Paul case not to be disclosed. "Do you think it's appropriate for someone to -- at a federal level -- to try to keep information out in order to disguise what's actually going on?" Issa asked. "There are a whole variety of reasons why people, why we as a government and Justice Department, decide not to become involved in qui tam cases," Holder replied. Holder and Issa went back and forth until Holder lost it... "It is inappropriate and too consistent with the way in which you conduct yourself as a member of Congress," Holder said. "It is unacceptable. It is shameful."

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
no life's picture

He's on the team though, I mean, come on..

Pinto Currency's picture

 

Issa is shameful.

And Holder who ran 1,500 AR-15s to Mexican drug gangs is...?

knukles's picture

Shameful.
Is that like inappropriate rearranging your nutsack under the table when you think nobody else is watching?

Jesus....

Xibalba's picture

all i hear is chimptalk

The Thunder Child's picture

One big criminal enterprise....

Pure Evil's picture

It does kinda remind you of a bunch of monkeys all throwing feces at each other.

GetZeeGold's picture

 

 

I find you shameful sir........even the mafia has a code of conduct.

1100-TACTICAL-12's picture

I had both my ear's removed, there is an 100% chance I'll be exposed to this dog & pony bullshit in the future..

max2205's picture

Fuck you in the ear Eric. ...dickface

ghandi's picture

The arrogance of this mutherfucker!

 

Did anyone else catch this shit?

ArkansasAngie's picture

Holder's use Washington Mumbai jumb of not answering the f'ing question is unacceptable.

toys for tits's picture

Eric Holder - "I'll look at the request [subpoena] and try to be as responsive as I can."

steelhead23's picture

Yes Toys, don't you get the feeling that that "look at the request" will take place in a stall of the DOJ men's room and the result will be a resounding ker-flush!

toys for tits's picture

Like he hasn't already done that. Subpoenas from congress have no meaning anymore.

You know he's just toying with them for the power play when he says that he hasn't seen it.

ATM's picture

Now we can move on to the real issue. Issa is obviously a racist.

El Oregonian's picture

Hey Eric! Respond to this you prick-licking pervert! We're going to RAM that Benghazi subpoena so far up your ass that you'll be using it as dental-floss for weeks!

Chupacabra-322's picture

This Criminal needs to be hung upside down, have his throat sliced from ear to ear in front of his other Criminal cohorts & as they watch him drown in his own blood as they wait for the same outcome.

DeadFred's picture

My latest theory is that IRS-gate and AP-gate are due to Benghazi and to a lesser degree on letting go the connected Saudi suspect from first Boston bombing. The traction in both those cases came from whistle blowers and leaks to the press. Then strangely just days later we get the Feds confessing that they have been blatantly abusing their power. "Give us grief and you'll get audited. Leak something to the press and we'll get your phone number or worse. When NOTHING happens to them for the abuses it will have a chilling effect on people who contemplate ratting the regime out. This is a Chicago thug power demonstation like finding a horse head in bed with you. Remember that the feds volunteered the info on what they were doing in both cases.

francis_the_wonder_hamster's picture

"Eric Holder - "I'll look at the request [subpoena] and try to be as responsive as I can.",

Yeah, a couple of things stand out about Holder's reply.  1.  The obvious disdain he implies by treating a congressional subpoena (which is an order) like it is a polite request that he may or may not deem worthy of his attention.  2.  Holder indicates that he hadn't even bothered to read said subpoena, which implies either (another) pass-the-buck lie, or a complete lack of control over his department.

I happen to live just outside of Issa's district, and find him to be a typical political scumbag locally, but I certainly am hoping he actually has some teeth this time.

DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Eric "Place" Holder is without doubt the worst AG we have ever had, and now he is in the running with Jon Corzine to win the award "The Biggest P.O.S. on Planet Earth."

So many candidates from this Administration...

DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Holder/Weiner 2016 sounds just as good...

whisperin's picture

That does sound a little better than Weiner/Holder 2016 but not by much!!!

Dollar Bill Hiccup's picture

Yes, but how does it feel ? That's important too.

DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Good point there.  We'll have to work that one...

andrewp111's picture

I'd like to see Holder holding Weiner's weiner.

novanglus's picture

Hold her weiner?  Hey, if you're into that kind of thing, who am I to criticize? :-)

James_Cole's picture

The worst AG, no. Precedents set (of which he does have some) are more important than continued. He is up there though.

Partisan tools will of course claim him the worst but that's ignoring history. Ignoring history is very popular on here though.

DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Pray tell us who is worse.  Back up any candidates with logic.

Bwahahahahahahaha!  Stepped in that James_Cole, squish!!

Bay of Pigs's picture

John Mitchell?

LOL.

EDIT: Its a joke. Mitchell was a piker compared to this current asshole.

tango's picture

Right. Mitchell could not even imagine the lengths to which the DOJ has gone to subvert the law / Constitution. On NPR we suddenly find Obana supporters gnashing their teeth at the terrible AP for endangering the security of the American people! So it 's come full circle - those who once derided Bush's methods are now openly supporting even worse ones. Talk about intellectual dishonesty.

Bananamerican's picture

+100

don't forget,

Alberto R. Gonzales: slimy amoral bullshitting ass-licking mexican douchebag

DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Ah, Woodrow Wilson's guy.  Another #Winning!

Bay of Pigs's picture

Palmer did some pretty lousy things but Holder is responsible for many American deaths. 

Exactly whose agenda are you pushing here @ ZH James?

Pure Evil's picture

He's not pushing agendas, he's just trying to push people's buttons.

James_Cole's picture

He's not pushing agendas, he's just trying to push people's buttons.

People constantly confuse (intentionally and unintentionally) trends with aberrations. When you have an aberration it's fixable. 

This binary political thing works so effectively because every step worse can be painted as an aberration as one team is always on hand to claim 'this' particular administration is way out of order suggesting that if you get the other guys in it'll be fixed. Meanwhile, the team on trial can point to the recent past and say 'look at what your guy did!' Goes back and forth forever.

The source of the problem meanwhile escapes unscathed - the source in this case being the office of the AG, not really any particular AG.  

Pure Evil's picture

Obama's only problem is that he doesn't have an Ollie North to step forward and wrap himself in Old Glory to deflect all of Obutholes detractors.

James_Cole's picture

Liberals need to be convinced to turn against him en masse. There's a lot of grassroots activism that truthfully presents what's going on but the tv news is so incredibly partisan that it effectively obfuscates everything. Everyone (both sides of the aisle + news) benefits from the partisan theatrics, the only loser is the people.

This US propaganda machine is the best of the best so it's hard to compete with, but shit like this (FOIA request) from the 'transparent' Obama regime needs to be more widely distributed:

http://www.aclu.org/files/pdfs/email-content-foia/DOJ%20Crim%20Div%20doc...

Cabreado's picture

"The source of the problem meanwhile escapes unscathed - the source in this case being the office of the AG, not really any particular AG. "

That was one of the creepiest things I've read -- anywhere -- in quite a while.

You appear to be exposing yourself.  Again(?)

pods's picture

I disagree, not creepy and cuts throug the red-blue bullshit.

The problem is not WHO is there, the problem is that there is a THERE to begin with.

An office that holds that much power is anathema to liberty, so no matter who holds the office, it is the office that is the problem.

Most do not care how much power the government has, only that their team calls the shots. James is pointing out the underlying problem.

(If I am reading James correctly.)

pods

James_Cole's picture

An office that holds that much power is anathema to liberty

Most do not care how much power the government has, only that their team calls the shots.

This is the point. How often do you see a president scale back the powers their predecssor added to the position? Of course, when their predecessor (as long as they were on the other side) was expanding the office it was oh-so-terrible and unconstitutional. 

NotApplicable's picture

Exposed as coherent, perhaps. What's creepy is the number of people who fail to understand the evil inherent in any forced collective.

seek's picture

I think Janet Reno still probably has a higher body count than Holder.

Ignatius's picture

Gonzales was some serious competition.  Worse?  I don't know, how does one grade dog shits?

jimmytorpedo's picture

Onegrades dog shits on how are they are to pick up and throw away mostly.

James_Cole's picture

Gonzales was some serious competition.  Worse?  I don't know, how does one grade dog shits?

How far they pushed the needle is a good metric (and under that criteria Gonzales is particularly egregious) but it gets too partisan. 

I don't know how you overcome the partisan hurdles, but looking back at the history of the office of ag is illuminating.