This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Guest Post: It's Not About Obama...
Submitted by Brandon Smith of Alt-Market blog,
In 1917, the Bolshevik Revolution gained general victory against the empire’s sovereign, Czar Nicholas Romanov II, a monarchal ruler widely considered despotic and inhumane in his treatment of the Russian citizenry. After the dethroned Romanov family was summarily executed by former members of the military, the Bolshevik rampage continued against the remnants of the “White Russians”, culminating in a bloody civil war. In the minds of the common populace, the communist propaganda was legitimate. The people had been terribly oppressed, and the world war in Europe was draining any hope of prosperity they had left. The Russians were ready for an abrupt and even violent change in their political leadership.
However, unbeknownst to them, a great upheaval was about to be supplied for them. Their anger and rage, their revolutionary spirit, was about to be exploited to produce vast gains for international interests and create a massive experiment in collectivist tyranny that would span decades and claim millions of innocent lives.
That’s right, in case you’ve never read a real history book with concrete facts, the Russian revolution was an almost entirely fabricated event. International financial interests, known today as “globalists” with no patriotic ties to any particular nation, supplied the funding, the philosophy, and even the leadership of the Bolshevik uprising against Nicholas II:
Now, does this mean I support the tyranny of czarism? No. Does this mean I support the despotic actions of the Romanov dynasty? No. My point is that an immoral government was used by globalists to rally the downtrodden people around an even more immoral and destructive government which the money men had full control over. The elitists gauge the revolutionary fervor of a particular society, and, when they believe the time is ripe, they co-opt that revolution by installing their own leadership and creating their own events.
In my view, the American Revolution was a startling wake up call for the globalists. The concept of centralized monarchy and godlike rulers was dead. Common people were ready to fight for the right to participate in their own political systems, and as the American patriots proved, they could win. The elites responded, cleverly, with events like the French Revolution. They tested the waters for public discontent, then, manhandled revolutions into being when the moment was right. If a revolt was about to occur, fine; as long as the globalists controlled the outcome, revolution could serve their interests.
This strategy is used even today. One merely need examine the escalation of the so-called “Arab Spring” to see that globalists manipulate legitimate social anger over legitimate oppression in order to create a rebellion that they can dictate. The destabilization of Syria being perhaps the most blatant act of fabricated insurgency by international financiers in history.
Though brutal and bloody, revolution is actually a very natural human act of balance which counters the unnatural and engineered functions of centralization. Human beings are not meant to be “ruled”. The spirit of individualism, inherent in every person from the moment of birth, strikes hard against the visible construction of any cage. We are designed to rebel. It is a fact of our existence.
Only an oblivious fool would try to deny that America is on the verge of revolution today. Public discontent politically, socially, and economically, is at an apex not seen in decades. The White House under the presidency of Barack Obama is in a shambles, sweltering in a sweaty sauna of corruption and scandal. The revelation of Nixon’s Watergate is a joke compared to the Benghazi conspiracy of covertly funded Syrian insurgency and false flag treason against a U.S. diplomat, the IRS persecution of conservative opposition, the wiretapping and privacy invasion of mainstream journalists, the admission of assassination initiatives against American citizens, etc, etc. Truly, whether you consider yourself on the “right”, or the “left”, if you have any sense of conscience or honor, Barack Obama is a monster of epic proportions.
That said, I challenge you to question whether or not Obama is the real danger, or just a boogeyman being used to control YOUR sense of rebellion?
The American citizenry is ready to snap. I can feel it, and I think many others out there can feel it too. A fight is inevitable. The question is, what will be the form of that fight, and who will ultimately determine the outcome? There is a lot of talk in the Liberty Movement today concerning “solutions” which I believe, according to historical reference, are perfect examples of controlled opposition. After several years working in the movement, I’ve heard it all…
Military Coup
The idea of military coup against the Obama Administration is alluring for several reasons. For one, it comforts those people who fear personal sacrifice or direct conflict. There are many out there, even in the Liberty Movement, who are desperate to avoid confrontation. They don’t want to lose their property, they don’t want to lose their job security, they don’t want to enter into combat, and they certainly don’t want to lose their lives in the process. These fears are understandable, but ultimately irrelevant.
The military coup concept feeds into the apprehensions of the common activist by giving them a false “way out”. If “patriotic” generals within the military rise up against the Obama regime and wrest power from its clutches, then average citizens will be spared the heartbreak and terror of fighting for themselves. They will not have to devise their own strategies, their own structures, or their own end solutions. They merely have to sit back, allow military factions to defeat the “evil usurper”, and then enjoy whatever government the leaders of the coup devise. Surely, anything would be better than to continue under the rule of a communist thug…
I would point out, however, that this is NOT what the Founding Fathers did, which is one of the reasons why they were so successful. Revolutionary leadership was maintained by citizens, not a cadre of military elites, and the aftermath of victory was managed by those chosen by the people to lead, not those chosen by generals. The war was fought by regular men, living regular lives, in support of beloved families. It was exactly because those men had everything to lose that they were driven so completely to succeed. They were fighting for their homes, and their principles. Not for political power.
I would also point out that most military brass hold views consistent with Neo-Conservative or even Neo-Liberal ideologies, both of which are slightly different versions of the same globalist religion. They may preach to us about their grand designs for freedom, but in reality, many of them are seeking to co-opt our resolve and use it to foment a controlled and homogenized uprising that will end in the same tyranny that we originally hoped to defeat.
A military coup is not a silver bullet solution to our problems. It may appear to be easier, but there will never be true freedom for any of us without tangible sacrifice. This battle is ours. Beware of anyone who strolls out of nowhere and offers to fight it for you.
March On Washington D.C.
Our problems will not be solved by military coup exactly because Barack Obama is not the primary source of our problems. He is a middle-man, a mascot, a salesman for the collectivist dictatorship, and nothing more. Getting rid of him in the wrong way will only exacerbate our dilemma.
Because our fight is with a globalist element that uses government as a tool, rather than a seat of power, removing one abusive president will change nothing. This is why the “March on Washington” idea is strategic idiocy at its most dangerous and cliché. I can’t tell you how many times over the years I have heard chest beating activists wail in anger, wondering “why, oh why!” we don’t all simply “take up arms” and march to the capital. Well, here are few good reasons…
First, how many successful revolutions began with a march on a government center? I can’t think of any. But, I can think of a few military campaigns that were thwarted by dumb marches led by thoughtless leaders. What about the battles of Lexington and Concord, in which Lt. Colonel Francis Smith of the British Army under the direction of General Thomas Gage led 700 regulars into a wasp’s nest of colonials who proceeded to wipe them out and fully launch the revolution with the American people clearly established in the eyes of the world as the defenders, and the British as the aggressors?
What about the ill conceived Confederate march on Fort Sumter which painted them as dangerous aggressors against the North, haunting the southern campaigns throughout the Civil War, and has even been partly attributed as a reason for their eventual defeat?
What about the hubris driven march of George Armstrong Custer, right into the mouth of enemy territory, on ground which the enemy was vastly more familiar, and against a force of far greater strength? That didn’t end so well either…
No one with any legitimate combat sense would ever suggest that a REVERSE Lexington is a good idea for the Liberty Movement today, and, no one with any understanding of asymmetric warfare would condescend to lead thousands of patriots into D.C., into what amounts to an elongated kill box, or an immediate surrender. The message sent during such a campaign would be “hey, we’re gullible, please kill us”, or, “hey, we’re pansies, please take our weapons and lock us away without a fight”. In either case, we lose, and all in the name of an ill conceived attack on a bunch of paid cronies and a puppet president, rather than the men behind the curtain. Dumb. Very dumb…
Rely On Opposing Party Leadership
The Republican Party is an embarrassment to many conservatives, but not for the reasons that should be most embarrassing. Sadly, many Americans only care about belonging to the “winning side”, rather than the right side. Currently, Republican excuses for consistent losses revolve around the fantasy of “changing demographics” and “a disconnection from the more moderate and liberal public”. These scapegoats have nothing to do with the disintegration of the Republican Party.
In truth, the Republican establishment continues to degrade not because it does not appeal to some imaginary growing faction of budding American socialists, but because it no longer appeals to conservatives and constitutionalists. The Neo-Con leadership of the backwards party continuously supports nearly identical legislative actions to the hated Obama paradigm. Unfortunately, there are still some naïve people out there who hope against hope that the GOP will rise up and defeat the Democratic stronghold, all while the GOP openly energizes Democratic policies.
Consider that both Republicans and Democrats strong armed the American public into massive banker bailouts which have so far produced no real jobs, and no tangible recovery, but have created perhaps the largest stock bubble the world has ever seen.
Consider the “Safe Act” legislation of New York, which imposes draconian restrictions on the 2nd Amendment; long held as a Republican line in the sand. Yet, 11 Republicans voted YES in line with Democrats to pass the bill.
Consider that many Neo-Con Republicans attacked the filibuster against anti-gun rights legislation in the Senate as if the move was “outlandish”.
Consider that the wire tapping of the Obama Administration is merely an extension of the wire tapping used by the Bush Administration under FISA and the Patriot Act.
Consider the expansion of executive assassination and rendition powers under the NDAA, which are widely supported by both Republicans and Democrats.
Consider that the AUMF, the resolution which is often used to justify the further passage of NDAA provisions for treatment of U.S. citizens as “enemy combatants”, was established under George W. Bush, and is defended to this day by many Republicans despite the abuses of Barack Obama.
Consider that provisions within the latest immigration legislation that call for biometric ID’s as well as tracking of U.S. citizens are supported by both Democrats and Republicans.
Consider that John McCain, often labeled a “die-hard Republican” and hero to islamophobes everywhere, has now personally visited with Syrian insurgents openly working with Al Qaeda to overthrow the Assad government. These are the same insurgents that have been accused of false flag chemical weapons attacks which were then blamed on Assad, and the same insurgents that have a penchant for severing the heads and eating the raw hearts of their prisoners in front of video cameras. For all the talk of Obama being secretly supportive of Islamic terrorism, the Republicans seem to be just as friendly.
I could go on and on, but I think my point is clear; there is no light at the end of the election tunnel in the Republican Party. The Neo-Cons and the Neo-Libs have the same objective, total centralization and the dissolution of U.S. sovereignty. Both parties are merely continuing the perpetual game of good-cop vs. bad-cop, switching roles every decade or so to keep the public confused and dependent on the system rather than enforcing their own solutions. Barack Obama is nothing more than a fulcrum point - a useful piece of leverage meant to push Americans from one fake initiative to the next, or to divide us completely. Our fight is not with Obama, it is with ALL globalists who obstruct our liberty, regardless of what party they are affiliated with. If we allow the debate, and the battle, to be framed around the superficial Obama presidency, then we have allowed ourselves to be co-opted, and any revolutionary action we take afterwards will end exactly like the fabricated Bolshevik rebellion; it won’t mean a damn thing.
»
- 25830 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
Sounds like the article hurt your personal feelings somehow. Care to share?
Great article with horrid comments. A little down the line there is about 40 comments devoted to buttfucking. Stay. On. Topic.
Or at least in context. Everyday brings a whole new round of metaphorical buttfucking to a significant portion of the population. And Obama isn't the whole problem and most certainly representative thereof.
Palpable - you're talking about palpable.
Almost every author like this glosses over that the founders put in a big fat political reset clause, Article V. Before the shoot'n starts, it is likely to be invoked by the state legislatures that are much more responsive to populist pressures to end what will amount a federal threat to state soverienty via its financial largess.
Any constitutional convention of the states in this situation and the amendments that follow will by definition put the full stop to federal powers and likely roll many back, explicitly. This will be to the great consternation of "deep blue" states like California and New York, because to ratify an amendment it's 3/4 vote by each state, not population, and there are a lot of flyover states in between.
It has to get bad though. Even now, people in California and New York pay more into other states than they take. But this balance will end soon, as other states realize the federal "take" is coming in too many other detrimental forms.
Look at the hate we're breeding
Look at the fear we're feeding
Look at the lives we're leading
The way we've always done before
My hands are tied
The billions shift from side to side
And the wars go on with brainwashed pride
For the love of god and our human rights
And all these things are swept aside
By bloody hands time can't deny
And are washed away by your genocide
And history hides the lies of our civil wars
D'you wear a black armband
When they shot the man
Who said "peace could last forever"
And in my first memories
They shot Kennedy
I went numb when I learned to see
So I never fell for Vietnam
We got the wall of D.C. to remind us all
That you can't trust freedom
When it's not in your hands
When everybody's fightin'
For their promised land
And
I don't need your civil war
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor
Your power hungry sellin' soldiers
In a human grocery store
Ain't that fresh
I don't need your civil war
Ow, oh no, no, no, no, no
Look at the shoes you're filling
Look at the blood we're spilling
Look at the world we're killing
The way we've always done before
Look in the doubt we've wallowed
Look at the leaders we've followed
Look at the lies we've swallowed
And I don't want to hear no more
My hands are tied
For all I've seen has changed my mind
But still the wars go on as the years go by
With no love of god or human rights
'Cause all these dreams are swept aside
By bloody hands of the hypnotized
Who carry the cross of homicide
And history bears the scars of our civil wars
"We practice selective annihilation of mayors and
Government officials for example to create a vacuum
Then we fill that vacuum as popular war advantage
Peace is closer" **
I don't need your civil war
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor
Your power hungry sellin' soldiers
In a human grocery store
Ain't that fresh
And I don't need your civil war
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no
I don't need your civil war
I don't need your civil war
Your power hungry sellin' soldiers
In a human grocery store
Ain't that fresh
I don't need your civil war
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no uh-oh-uh, no uh-oh, uh no
I don't need one more war
I don't need one more war
No, no, no, no uh-oh-uh, no uh-oh, uh no
Whaz so civil 'bout war anyway?
Nothing will change because most people want to be told what to do and how to live their lives. As long as there is bread and circuses then Rome is safe.
Why it's as if Congress et al all trot out to the river Rubicon to piss in it, then dare us to cross!
OK, How do we get at them?
@bastiat
Has your priest been interfering with you?
You've done nothing wrong my child, you can tell us!
Regarding the post i was getting excited, drawn in until the big letdown, NO SOLUTIONS OFFERED JUST WHAT NOT TO DO.
DAMN!!!
Here's an idea, stop waiting around for other people to solve your problems for you and devise a plan yourself. I know it's a novel concept to rely on oneself, but hey, you might try it sometime...
What solutions can some one else 'Hand Me'. Perfect.
It will be ok this time. 7 billion people know the enemy are the money men and there is a hell of a lot of opportunity awaiting those that go up against them. Sort of like being the last food on the planet. They're bout to be eht.
The American citizenry is ready to snap. I can feel it, and I think many others out there can feel it too. A fight is inevitable.
_____________________
You have to give it to 'americans'. You can trust them to deliver on certain departments.
This 'american' author is a wasted talent. He should join Hollywood. He is gone, totally insulated in his own fantasy world, unable to connect with reality but to re inforce his own fantasy.
What "fantasy" is the author supposedly reinforcing?
That there is a revolution against the power apparatus brewing in the US.
If that 'american' author was writing about the potentiality of ethnical cleansing once again showing up on the US ground, yes, he might have some points...
But a revolution or an uprising against the power apparatus in the US...
Are you an American citizen?
I unfortunately find myself agreeing with Analmouse here.
He's not even an American citizen. What would he know about the social undercurrents in our country today? Some Americans out there are barely aware of them, let alone a pretentious foreigner.
True, but the idea that Americans are ready to revolt in large numbers is simply preposterous.
Looking in the mirror again, I see.
It is part of the 'american' urge to take shelter into fantasy to claim that reality is itself fantasy.
You're projecting your own failings, and those of your fucked-up society, onto others again.
Make me laugh.
Oh now, the 'american' actions all over the world are the projections of my own failings...
May all the 'american' readers of this commercial site read and understand that.
Ben Bernanke's policies do not exist. They are mere projections of my own failings. So that 'american' says.
Anything that can assuage an 'american' mind goes, apparently.
Whatever it takes to assuage your Chinese Citizenism guilt and feelings of inferiority.
If you are a human, and not the spambot that I think you are, you are pathetic and contemptible in your blind hatred and bigotry.
AnAnonymous, failing to perceive the obvious, said:
That has been understood for quite some time.
Made me laugh.
Neo-Cons + Neo-Libs + 'Wall St' = KGP
- Koscher Globo-Punks.
What about the hubris driven march of George Armstrong Custer, right into the mouth of enemy territory, on ground which the enemy was vastly more familiar, and against a force of far greater strength? That didn’t end so well either…
___________________________________________
The 'american' usage of the word "enemy" is typical.
It is funny how 'americans' use that label to strengthen the bounds within their groups.
The enemy is everywhere. So say 'americans'
Promotion of liberty the way 'americans' do.
You're "retarded."
And 'autistic'.
Welcome to the AnAnonymystical world.
It's a mind-bending place, you'll see.
Don't forget your thorazine.
It would only mean that even a retarded can point out the duplicity of 'americans'
May be time to proceed to a reality check when a retarded can call you out...
You've never called anyone or anything out, actually, aside from your own raging bigotry and pathetically crippled intellect.
Now go wok the dog.
Welcome to the AnAnomalous world.
It's a retarded kind of place, you'll see.
You've never called anyone or anything out, actually,
_______________________
'Americans' and the urge of their eternal 'american' nature, forcing them to illustrate any point made about them in the minute.
The author was called out for the 'american' usage of the word enemy.
There is nothing of logic, reason or honesty in any of your posts.
I really do think that you are an automated spambot, as you cannot argue rationally, logically or factually to even the slightest degree.
Only endless repetitions of your raging anti-American bigotry and hate.
Blind bigotry and blind hatred. It is all you know.
Pathetic, really.
Usually, the autistic are more compassionate and reasonable than that.
More fantasy from an 'american'. Should anyone be surprised by that?
You know, come to think of it, your every post is a clear violation of the new ZeroHedge policy prohibiting egregious and broadbrushed attacks on ethnic and national groups. Perhaps a word dropped to Tyler would be in order.
And deprive ZH readers of his outstanding unintentional Chinese citizenism stand-up (and squat-down) comedy with humour much the dangdang perish thought?
Perhaps AnAnonymystical anecdote pours reconsiderationalizing:
Former coach who had plenty of little catch sentences sweating Chinese citizenism.
One was "you don't wok a dog with a leash".
The Chinese citizenism citizen usage of the word 'american' is typical.
It is funny how 'AnAnonymists' use that label to strengthen the bounds within their groups.
'Americans' are everywhere. So says AnAnonymous.
Promotion of insanitation the way Chinese citizenism citizens do.
The 'american' project is a global project. It is as global as humanity can be.
Unluckily for that 'american' author, the US seats at the top of the 'american' world order.
Oh, yes, they are 'american' global institutions that do impose the 'american' points of view on a global scale.
But as the top dog on the chain, the US is unbound by those global 'american' institutions. The US can anytime bypass, overide those institutions as shown very obviously by the war against Iraq.
There is no globalist power wishing for imposing their will on a global scale but the 'americans' themselves.
What is happening in the US does not happen because of foreign powers. No foreign power has strength enough to coerce the US. It does happen as the continuation of 'americanism'. 'Americanism' drives the spirit of the 'americans' powerful enough to exert a global reach.
Those power people has a home base: that home base is the US.
It is an 'american' world order and the US, as the mecca of 'americanism' is at the top.
Immolate a Tibetan "foreign devil" for Mao!
Eviscerate a uniformed soldier for an 'american' war of liberation
Bomb a marriage for an 'american' war of liberation
Shoot down a family of four going off their van for an 'american' war of liberation
Practice an ethnical cleansing for an 'american' war of liberation
And so much more...
'Americans' are so more efficient when it comes to certain departments.
'Americanism' in China. Quick.
Yes, only Americans do wrong in the world.
Your own Chinese society, and your Chinese communist masters, are as pure as the driven snow.
Nope, no resource consumption in China whatsoever.
No infringements on the human rights of Chinese citizens by their own dictatorial government.
No corruption, no abuses of power, no corruption in China, nope, none at all.
No blobbing-up in any way.
Make me laugh.
Side tracking as usual. 'American' nature forcing them to illustrate any point made about them.
From the statement that 'americans' perform so much better in certain departments to the sidetrack only 'americans' do wrong in the world.
The way it is. 'Americans' cant take it they are casting stones from the house made in glass the most, so they have to dismiss the existence of glass houses.
Whatever happens in Tibet, 'Americans' outmatch that with style and ease.
'Americanism' in China. Quick.
"Sidetracking"?
Your train of logic derailed long ago, and the cars are heaped-up in a smoldering wreck.
Welcome to the AnAnonymystical world.
It's a mental trainwreck, you'll see.
Alas, alas, two dung-encrusted shoes alas, Chinese citizenism "sidetracking" occurs after walking next to the road.
Welcome to the AnAnonymystical world.
It will ruin your carpets, you'll see.
Isn't it time for you to wok your dog?
.
Typical Chinese citizenism citizenish rationalization.
No, it is an issue with Chinese citizenism, not with humans.
As a sidenote, it explains how the story of non humans has gained so much steam in this Chinese citizenism driven world.
It is quite simple:
It is postulated that this behaviour is human.
But human beings do not behave like that for all of them.
Answer: therefore they are non human.
It is coercion under raw form. If you do not comply with what Chinese citizenism citizens say human nature is (and human nature is in the 'AnAnonymystical' mind the way Chinese citizenism citizens behave) then you endanger yourself with being treated like a non human being. Better to comply.
So, Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama are the same thing?
Sorry, no sale.
OK, one down arrow from AnActualMoron but three others.
This is why we are fucked. There is a big difference. At the very least in the side to which their lip service was paid.
Not the same at first, until the elites had Ron shot, then he fell right into line and became exactly the same as Barack Obama...
What was that I read about the Hinckley and Bush families again? Oh, yeah.
- Franz Kafka
PeaBird, FYI... your Up-arrow is not working.
Obama is a POS. No need for your fancy analysis. Deal with the the devil you have and by the way your historical analysis is also POS. Deal with it. Fail. Can you take it?
.
I appeciate your response. I am only a voice crying out in the wilderness but no one can say to me, it's not about obama'. This is the deadine. I hope the commen folk march in the millions. Enough of this travesty. America live up to your promise. It is a grand vision.
I am fully with you...
Yeah, let's suit up and charge right into a false flag or a straight massacre. No need to take centuries of lessons in revolution and guerrilla warfare into account. Blind optimism will see us through, just as it always has...
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Friday said his visit with rebels in Benghazi, Libya, was "one of the most exciting and inspiring days of my life."
McCain landed in Libya on Friday for meetings with rebel fighters and opposition leaders who have been trying for two months to drive embattled leader Moammar Gadhafi from power. “What I have witnessed today in Benghazi is a powerful and hopeful example of what a free Libya could be — a place where the dignity and the desires of all people for freedom and opportunity are respected," McCain said.But McCain said more work is needed to defeat Gadhafi's forces, including stepping up offensive airstrikes. "We desperately need more close air-support and precision strike assets — such as A-10s and [AC-130 gunships]," McCain said. McCain was reportedly set to meet with members of the National Transition Council, the opposition group based in the eastern half of Libya. He moved around in a heavily armored Mercedes jeep and was greeted by Libyan citizens waving American flags, The Associated Press reported. McCain applauded President Obama's decision on Thursday to send Predator drones to Libya.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/157305-mccain-lands-in-libya-for-meetings-with-rebel-fighters-anti-gadhafi-group#ixzz2Ulxm13en
by MIGUEL MARQUEZ and MICHAEL MURRAY April 22, 2011Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, was on the front lines in Libya today to encourage Libyan rebels fighting to end Moammar Gadhafi's 40 year rule.
In Benghazi, McCain attracted a crowd so enthusiastic that at one point he joked, "I've got to bring you to Arizona." McCain, the 2008 Republican nominee for president, is the highest-profile U.S. visitor to have met with the rebel forces.
The Senator had a blunt message for the Obama administration: increase support for the rebels or face failure. "There are great doubts that Gadhafi won't go right now because it is essentially a stalemate," said McCain.
Rebels complain that since April 4, when the U.S. handed operational control to NATO, air strikes have not done enough to help their cause.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/libya-war-sen-john-mccain-visits-lib...
Screw the neo-con warmonger McCain. (Not in the unvirtuous, sodomite way that F.Bastiat is always screeching about though.)
Amen
"That said, I challenge you to question whether or not Obama is the real danger, or just a boogeyman being used to control YOUR sense of rebellion?"
OK I will take that challenge.
Barack Obama is not a natural born Citizen, since he was born British, of a British subject father, Barack Obama Sr. ("an IMPROPER ASCENDANT", i.e. "ANCESTOR"--- who gave improper foreign influence--- See Federalist 68). If the Chief Executive of the American government is an illegal entity, then there is no law, and no Constitution. The NWO PTB know this, that is why they put him there. Congress has committed treason in allowing him there, therefore they protect him.
John McCain was not eligible either (born in PCZ, and needed US Statute to make him a US Citizen-- US Code 8 S. 1403--- natural born Citizens are born in the US of 2 US Citizen parents--- what else would they be, no statute is necessary to make them a US Citizen, therefore they are natural born Citizens --- it is the law of nature, i.e US Common Law--- SEE law of nature and nature's god--- Declaration of Independence.). The NWO made sure an ineligible non natural born Citizen was elected by serving up 2 ineligible candidates. Obviously it is important to them to void US Citizen sovereignty, by Usurping the Presidency of the US. Do you think it is coincidence that so many being touted for VP and POTUS on the R side are not eligible natural born Citizens?--- i.e Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum--- all born of one or two non US Citizen parents.
US Law (SCOTUS PRECEDENT):
"The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners." Minor v. Happersett, 88 US 162, 167 (1874)
The mass realization that Obama is not eligible is a game changer. It would expose the massive treason that has occurred in Congress, the judiciary and the media. He will be protected at all cost. Therefore it CERTAINLY IS ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, he is a direct threat to the citizenry of the US. HE is a domestic enemy of the Republic. That the President SHALL BE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN is a self executing Constitutional provision. NO LAW is necessary to enforce it. If ANY COURT finds him ineligible then he must step down until the highest court makes the final determination--- SEE US Code 3 S. 19, and Amendment 25--- the Presidnet may be removed do to "INABILITY", i.e. LEGAL INCAPACITY.
This needs to be done within the laws that the NWO is attempting to moot, not with violence. We the people are being goaded into violence, just like the years preceding the American Revolution. Back then there was no law to turn to--- the King WAS the law.This goverment (Constitution) was created by We the people before it became the Ubited States, not handed to us by a King. We the people ratified that Constitution and became citizens, and those children born since the Declaration of Independence were the first natural born Citizens (See Art. 2 S. 1 C. 4--- it is the point in time of the ratification--- there was no other naturalization law except, "natural born Citizen, or a citizen at the time of the ratification"----Get it?). The LAW SAYS we can remove the President by the law if he is not eligible, and it will only take the mass realization that he is ineligible to restore the Republic---- THEREFORE IT MOST CERTAINLY IS ABOUT Barack Hussein Obama.
Remember Deuteronomy 17:15:
"Thou shalt not put a King over thee who is not they brother", and compare it to:
"No person, but a natural born Citizen, or a citizen at the time of the ratification of this Constititution, shall be eligible for the office of President."
Barrack Hussein Obama is not our brother, he is not a "creature of our own" (see Federalist 68). Therefore he is a domestic enemy, and must be dealt with within the law of the Republic, though the heavens shall fall.
The Neo-Cons aren't our brothers either. But they are good buddies with Obama...
Just read a decent article on the neocons, here:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/03/29/the-closing-of-the-jewish-mind/
There was a better one at the Christian Science Monitor a few years ago but it has been disappeared.
Didn't say they were, and pointed out that the Rs are just as guilty. So what's your point
That focusing on getting rid of Obama will change nothing, of course...what was YOUR point?
I thought the 'birthers' had all run off the same cliff. Did you get separated from the herd?
You and your ilk elected Bush. You helped exacerbate this mess.
Your comment is full-on nutbag nonsense, and you're suffering from green monkey syndrome with a bit of schizophrenia: you hate Obama because he is black. For that reason alone, you're an idiot. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to hate the bastard, but that's not one of them.
This is the 21st century you scat-brained racist zealot.
Ah, The Internet protection brigade of the Usurper makes its appearance. That means it strikes a nerve.
One of the more interesting comments I've read on here in a while. TY, MickV. I haven't checked your details and probably won't, being lazy and hoping others will. Interesting ideas, though.
The only thing going to "snap" in the USA is the top button on a pair of 501 jeans.... due to the obesity of the wearer. Generals leading a coup. they are nothing but ass sniffing ball licking political players. No way. The US is going to slide into socialism, communism and maybe 76 years later totally collapse, chanting.. si se puede... America as I knew it in the 50's will never return. Economically we have lost our competitive advantage and our citizenry is Mr. Softee on a pure fat diet. Mentally we are deceased and instead of living we watch reality shows with low life "stars". The politicians realize this and shit in the face of their consitutents and stuff thier pockets with taxpayer money. They mock us. Petroleum and Banking/Wall Street own this "president" and he is working hard for them. I dont think Obama has ever told the truth on any issue. Everything he says is a lie. Except he believes in a marxist government, and when it comes to it he will stand with this muslim bros.
I will believe things can change when I see Hilary tried for her crimes, Holder in a prison jumpsuit, and Obama imeached and convicted of treason. that would be a good start, but it wont happen because wash dc is the land of NO ACCOUNTABILITY... the Constitution has become a piece of paper that obama wipes his ass with.
The only thing going to "snap" in the USA is the top button on a pair of 501 jeans.... due to the obesity of the wearer. Generals leading a coup. they are nothing but ass sniffing ball licking political players. No way. The US is going to slide into socialism, communism and maybe 76 years later totally collapse, chanting.. si se puede... America as I knew it in the 50's will never return. Economically we have lost our competitive advantage and our citizenry is Mr. Softee on a pure fat diet. Mentally we are deceased and instead of living we watch reality shows with low life "stars". The politicians realize this and shit in the face of their consitutents and stuff thier pockets with taxpayer money. They mock us. Petroleum and Banking/Wall Street own this "president" and he is working hard for them. I dont think Obama has ever told the truth on any issue. Everything he says is a lie. Except he believes in a marxist government, and when it comes to it he will stand with this muslim bros.
I will believe things can change when I see Hilary tried for her crimes, Holder in a prison jumpsuit, and Obama imeached and convicted of treason. that would be a good start, but it wont happen because wash dc is the land of NO ACCOUNTABILITY... the Constitution has become a piece of paper that obama wipes his ass with.
going to slide into?
aren't we there?
never mind when 50 million socialists from south of the border are made american citizens (that's right, when you look down lines of successive family members that will be allowed in under this bill that is going to pass the senate - it's 50 million) by the stroke of a pen...there will be no choice.
Yikes, lots of vitriol sparked by this little article which, thankfully, I intentionally neglected to read. Watering my basil this morning took precedent over any worries about revolutions, tsars, atheists or historical perspectives. I'm here for one reason only: to see if anyone else took "fulcrum point" to be a euphemism for "pinhead."
This article begs the question....are Rand Paul and Ted Cruz just another version of the same old thing, or are they genuinely what they appear to be? I don't know, but I would like to believe the latter. See? We all want to believe in something.
This post needs a song to go with it.....
Arise, the workers of all nations!
Arise, oppressed of the earth!
For justice thunders condemnation:
A better world's in birth!
It is time to win emancipation,
Arise, you slaves, no more in thrall!
The earth will rise on new foundations:
We, who were nothing, shall be all!
Oddly enough this article is so very current 'america think'. The idea that they're all the same. Every discussion about the wrongs of the Obama admin are met with cries of that's what bush did, or you didn't care when bush did it.
The fact of the matter is that we DID care when Bush did it. That's why this piece of shit and the democratic sychophants were elected to a full boat, control of the WH and both the house and senate. Not because of the overwhelming support of democrats but because of the disgust of the right with the GOP and its offering of that old Tapioca swilling american hero Johnny McCain.
Tangentially, isn't McCain's greatness a bit overplayed by now? I mean, what did he actually do? He went to prison. Yes, he let himself stay in prison so others could be let go, yes he endured abuse. But, in the end, I think the insidiousness of Mao's little red book crept into his mind and pollutes it to this day. Isn't it like us nowadays to lift up and emulate a victim?
But, I digress. Then the right experiences a great comeback in 2010. Right? Why? Because a million people got up and marched into DC. No matter whether they were co-opted or the media did its Goebel's thing and painted them as heyucks and ignorant racists, the fact of the matter is that PEACEFUL march into DC DID do something. What was the GOP's response? Mitt Romney. Now, I think Mitt would've been miles above what we see now but the majority of right wingers, libertarians etc didn't see it that way, and they stayed home. Again, voting for Obama was way down, he could've been beaten with a decent candidate. But, let there be no mistake, there is a big difference between the left and right in this country, the actual citizenry, and I believe there are more righties than lefties by a long shot.
That's why this article is horseshit. I give credit to th author in that you don't want to try an armed rebellion. But, the reality is the Tea Party, in it's original formulation, changed the political landscape. That was with a million people. If 5 million of us marched in and demanded that the BS stop, it would. Politicians know one thing....re-election. They will do what it takes to get the votes and if they see 5 million demanding accountability, peacefully, they will change.
Right now all they see is people supporting Obama, whether it's real or not, that's all they see. Hence why these clowns in the GOP collapse, except for a very few (Ron Paul, Ted Kruz). Make no mistake, the GOP must be gutted and retooled, or abolished and replaced with a true political opposition party.
Or, maybe, it's all just over and we should just take what is given us.
The Tea Party is not a grassroots movement, but a manipulated self righteous group of hicks that can't add.. they want their forever war, their medicaid, their social security and their deep fried GMO chicken/pork on a wheat bun. They don't want to pay for any of it.
They think they are overtaxed...in fact they are undertaxed for the amount that they want to spend and have already spent. They offer no workable solution (there isn't one) and spend most of their time in congress in knee jerk opposition to the other side. There is NO other side They are Obama (as if he had any real policy power) and don't confuse them with the anti-war Libertarian rump. BTW WTF is a neo-liberal?
PS.. Noticed that Michelle Bachmann has been forced into the political wilderness to join Sarah Palin. They weer both put forward as credible TP candidates..... seems like a bad joke in retrospect.
Lemme guess, you thought OWS was...moron
Lots of historicql errors and elisions, but the overall point is correct, so far as it goes. Trouble is, it does not go so far as to investigate the ethnic warfare angle. Trotsky conferrred with his co-ethnics on Wall St to secure necessary financing for the Bolshevik coup (not a "democratic operation).
A team of his co-ethnics murdered the Tsar and his family.
The early Bolshevik party was overwhelmingly Jewish.
American Jews (many of the same who later funded Trotsty/Bronstein) successfully defeated a sitting President's policy wrt Russia in 1910. The Jews had a murderous rage against the Tsarist regime going back so far as the Congress of Vienna. It helps to actually dig into history.
If citing relevant facts unflattering to Jews ( a feature of most socdieties they dominate) makes you an "aunty Semite", then we are truly down the tubes.
I keep reading that the Jews and Rotchschilds had a 'murderous hatred' of the Russian Tzar. Can someone pls explain why?
PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
It's not a matter of "right" and "left."
It's a matter of right and wrong.
This is spot on, divide and rule.
"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." - James Madison
&
If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of superrich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite. – Gary Allen
As a neo-libertarian (level-4 tin-foil hat with full BlueTooth connectivity), I'd like to thank Mr. Smith for having the cajones to openly discuss the logistics and strategic aspects of revolution.
Thank you, sir.
I'll be in my bunk, preparing for my IRS audit if anyone needs me.
SPEECHLESS IS I...postulating 19th centuy breakdown (isnt that a song title)...in the second decade of the 21st...complete bullshit, AS IF