Virtually Entire US Media Boycotts "Off The Record" Meeting With Eric Holder

Tyler Durden's picture

The New York Times, The Associated Press, The Huffington Post, CNN and now, of course, Fox News: these are the media organizations, superficially from across the political spectrum, which have said they will boycott a meeting with the DOJ's embattled head, Eric Holder, on the topic of the DOJ's (not to mention the NSA's) Nixonian abuse of the first amendment and eavesdropping wherever and whenever it so chooses. The twist: the meeting is, paradoxically, supposed to be "off the record." One wonders: was this the DOJ's idea of being open and transparent - to hold a closed door meeting with the same media that it, allegedly, has been spying on, and thus put the media whose job is to report events - as in keeping the public informed - in a place where it can't do precisely that? It is as if the Marx Brothers are writing the tragicomic script for a sequence of events that inevitably ends with Holder's resignation and Obama's washing his hands of the whole affair.

From The Hill:

Fox is just the latest media organization to say it will boycott the meeting if it is off the record. Holder asked for the meetings in an attempt to ensure the press corps that its investigations of national security leaks are conducted in a way that respects the First Amendment.

 

The New York Times, The Associated Press, The Huffington Post and CNN have issued separate statements saying they will not attend because the DOJ is requiring the content of the meetings stay confidential.

 

Fox is at the center of the controversy surrounding the Justice Department’s investigation of national security leaks.

 

The DOJ seized the personal emails of Fox News chief Washington correspondent James Rosen and used other surveillance methods to investigate whether he was complicit in a leak of classified information.

 

It also examined his phone records and tracked his visits to the State Department using security-badge data during the 2009 probe; the DOJ also filed legal papers saying he may have acted as “an aider, abettor and/or co-conspirator” by getting materials from a government official also under investigation.

 

The House Judiciary Committee is now investigating whether Holder lied under oath during his May 15 testimony before the panel, in which he said he’s never been involved with or heard about a reporter being prosecuted for the disclosure of confidential material.

 

Fox News host Greta Van Susteren joked on her blog Thursday that if Fox was going to be the only media outlet attending the off-the-record meeting, they should send Rosen to meet with Holder.

It's good to know that as what little remaining constitional rights are stripped away by a government hell bent on converting the country to a "turnkey totalitarian state" (not our words, those of the NSA whistleblower who exposed that there is no privacy in the US anymore) and for whom the rule of law simply does not apply, is a laughing matter to someone.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
americanspirit's picture

Nick Jihad - I would agree that many judges are predisposed in favor of the system, but not all. There are at least a few who believe in the Constitution and not the system. May God bless them - and give pancreatic and/or brain cancer to the rest.

viahj's picture

apparently ass cancer is a much worse way to go

Go Tribe's picture

No...fuck you HIMPTON!

(that's his middle name, you know)

ParkAveFlasher's picture

WTF is "a Himpton"?  Sounds like Beltway regional slang for a middle-aged mullato bottom installed to a rubber-stamping position of false authority.

Colonel Klink's picture

Himpton, kind of like Hampton but he wasn't invited.

tradewithdave's picture

Actually, Himpton is a word.  It's when you have a "party for one" in the Hamptons.  It's called a Himpton... always has been... no invitation needed.  A Pimpton is when you pay people to come to the party... like "Lloyd's having a pimpton on Saturday with his $20 million salary... are you going?" 

And remember, there's no "I" in Justus, but there's an A in A-Team.  Actually there are two "A's" and a "T".  I pity the fool that has a counterparty when you can simply wear your wealth around your neck.  

azzhatter's picture

Fuck the Press too, bunch of commie sympathizers

JP McManus's picture

Oh, NOW they pretend to be journalists?

DaveyJones's picture

since they work for (and are owned) by the same people who own the people holding these meetings....what's the point?

NoDebt's picture

Don't get all worked up.  They are just applying leverage to make into an "on the record" news conference.  There's not much "solidarity" going on here.  They're just all individually seeing the same cards on the table and knowing it's time to double-down.

 

JustObserving's picture

And Holder pretends to be an Attorney General. Can we not all pretend together?

NoDebt's picture

I jsut read a story that BPNN DOES plan to attend this off-the-record news conference.

 

 

 

 

The Black Panthers News Network.

Totentänzerlied's picture

You supply the fake investigation, we'll supply the fake journalism.

Dareconomics's picture

Obama and Bush have the same exact ideas on presidential power.  Specifically, war justifies unchecked power.  Since we are always in a state of war...

http://dareconomics.wordpress.com/2013/05/30/around-the-globe-05-30-2013/

alien-IQ's picture

FUCK the entirety of the US MSM. They didn't give a shit about the government spying on the people but now, suddenly, that they realize it's also happening to them they get all high and mighty and indignant about it? FUCK EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM COCKSUCKERS STRAIGHT UP THEIR PROPAGANDA SPEWING TIGHT ASSES.

freewolf7's picture

It works to pit criminals against each other.

DollarMenu's picture

I can't help but feel that even tho these performers are stumbling, they are still distracting attention from the main event.

NoDebt's picture

And you think this situation is unique in that respect?  You are NEVER allowed to see the main event.

DaveyJones's picture

the back door is the front door when the terrorist is the liberator.

it all makes sense

correction, cents

ekm's picture

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/30/us-cftc-email-idUSBRE94T0VY20130530

 

Juicy!!!!!!!!!!

Darrell Issa seems to be after CFTC's Gary Gensler about private emails during Corzine's rain of other people's money.

 

ZerOhead's picture

Nope... nothing to see here... Gensler even told us so himself...

The report questioned whether it was proper for Gensler to recuse himself from handling MF Global (MFGLQ.PK), which collapsed in 2011, only after he played a prominent role in the events leading up to the firm's bankruptcy.

Gensler decided to distance himself from the brokerage only after it collapsed, and after Senator Charles Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, publicly raised concerns over his prior business relationship with MF Global Chief Executive Jon Corzine.

ZerOhead's picture

FREE Gensler's emails...

When questioned about it, Gensler told Lavik he used his private email because he did not know how to access his work e-mail from home. He has since ceased the practice.

He swears his dog accidentally deleted his emails...

pine_marten's picture

Free Gensler's entrails..

ParkAveFlasher's picture

Issa likes to pretend he's doing "the right thing".  Just another shakedown.  Although they are starting to shake down all my favorite anti-gold people.

NotApplicable's picture

I about puked when I read this line.

Gensler, an Obama appointee, is unpopular among Republican politicians for his aggressive reform of Wall Street.

Obviously, NONE of those words mean what I believe them to be.

WillyGroper's picture

>>>>The report also questioned his use of personal email to communicate with staff, saying the practice was discouraged by government policy.

Horseshit. I'd bet my eye teeth it's expressly forbidden!

>>>Gensler told Lavik he used his private email because he did not know how to access his work e-mail from home

And I'm King Farouk.

krispkritter's picture

Marx Brothers were funny, this shit isn't.  It smells of corruption, obfuscation, and the complete disregard for the Constitution and Bill of Rights.  The people aren't politicians or employees, they're traitors.

SilverIsKing's picture

I'll do the honors:

Marx Brothers were funny, this shit isn't.  It smells of corruption, obfuscation, and the complete disregard for the Constitution and Bill of Rights.  The people aren't politicians or employees, they're traitors.

Kobe Beef's picture

I have a sinking suspicion that the folks talking about UNITED STATES OF AMERICA being a completely different thing than The United States Of America are right.

One is a registered corporation created in 1871, owned by the Federal Reserve System since 1933 and operated under British Maritime Law by the City Of London, and the other was a Constitutional Republic founded in 1789.

http://reality-bytes.hubpages.com/hub/The-Corporation-Of-The-United-Stat...

http://www.teamlaw.org/DCOA-1871.pdf

I am not a lawyer, and recognize when I'm in over my head. Any professional thoughts/speculations from the Hedge?

 

CrimsonAvenger's picture

Well, sometimes it's a matter of either laughing or being led away in shackles.

krispkritter's picture

Bad mouse, bad, bad mouse...

Joebloinvestor's picture

You got brass ones Eric.

 

Yeah, lets' secretly discuss re-writing the 1st amendment, and invite the press.

azzhatter's picture

Might be brass but I'll bet they are tiny. fuck You Holder

Dapper Dan's picture

 

 

http://www.thecommentator.com/article/2495/ny_democrat_pleads_with_republican_not_to_share_document_proposing_confiscation_of_guns

NY Democrat pleads with Republican not to share document proposing confiscation of guns A New York Assemblyman has pleaded with his Republican colleague not to release a list of Democrat proposals on gun control that seek to undermine the 2nd Amendment

by The Commentator on 20 January 2013 14:43

 

The full list of proposals can be read below:

1. Confiscation of "assault weapons"
2. Confiscation of ten round clips
3. Statewide database for ALL Guns
4. Continue to allow pistol permit holder's information to be replaced to the public
5. Label semiautomatic shotguns with more than 5 rounds or pistol grips as "assault weapons”
6. Limit the number of rounds in a magazine to 5 and confiscation and forfeiture of banned magazines
7. Limit possession to no more than two (2) magazines
8. Limit purchase of guns to one gun per person per month
9. Require re-licensing of all pistol permit owners
10. Require renewal of all pistol permits every five years
11. State issued pistol permits
12. Micro-stamping of all guns in New York State
13. Require licensing of all gun ammo dealers
14. Mandatory locking of guns at home
15. Fee for licensing, registering weapons

americanspirit's picture

This is just politicians trying to give themselves an edge when TSHTF - the fewer guns there are out there, and the fewer rounds per gun, the better chance they have of escaping when the citizens finally come for them.

NotApplicable's picture

Brass? NFW.

Holder is merely the latest example of why one never goes "full retard."

At this point he is so compromised it's the only action he has left. He just better hope he doesn't have to fly overseas in a plane last used by Hillary.

Seeking Beta's picture

Started with Bush and Obama pumped it with steroids

caimen garou's picture

off the record? something to hide eric the dipshit? or to wrap the media a little tighter around obama's ass!

Northeaster's picture

"for whom the rule of law simply does not apply, is a laughing matter to someone."

The People allowed (voted for) it, now they have to live with it.

Things that go bump's picture

Please, as if we are being given an actual choice. We are given a carefully selected and approved red candidate and a carefully selected and approved blue candidate, both of whom are the same, only differing on minor and meaningless issues, such as abortion and gay marriage. Even the presidential offerings have to be interviewed and approved by Rothschild. What we've got is the illusion of choice rather than the substance of it. Our elections are about as meaningful as those farces they used to hold in the former Soviet Union or the ones Sadam Hussein used to hold or Juan Perron. 

imapopulistnow's picture

I'm even beginnig to wonder about Brietbart...

Tsunami Wave's picture

Just ask the medical examiner... Oh oops he was 'heart attacked' too.

SmittyinLA's picture

How long before Holder plays the Boehner/Senate card? 

ie they knew and approved of/consented to  in live time Benghazi, IRS & non-profits, and pretty much every other nefarious thing the Obama admin does.

We have a bipartisan treason problem

Joe Davola's picture

Good god, it's time to quit allowing this administration to spread the blame around.  You're the chief executive and responsible when things go wrong just as well as when they go right.

astoriajoe's picture

it would be fun to see him fake cry on camera. if only for laughs.