FOMC Decision - "Real Fundamentals" Or "Reaction Function"

Tyler Durden's picture

It appears the plethora of talking heads discussing the FOMC's potential decision to 'Taper' - and the subsequent sell-offs in a number of risk-assets - believe this action has stemmed from better economic data (as the 'manipulated' unemployment rate has drifted faerie-like towards their target - but don't call it a threshold). However, as Barclays notes and we have been warning, there is another interpretation that is more worrisome for the market - that is a change in the Fed's 'reaction function'. As is clear from the minutes of the latest FOMC meeting, there is a growing concern over bubbles, technical dislocations, and the cost-benefits of a QE program out of control. The market's reaction to these two reasons for 'tapering' will be significantly different and reading the Fed tea-leaves even more critical than ever.

 

 

Reaction function #1 - the consensus view...

The serial extrapolators at the Fed perhaps see the chart above and therefore - a Taper is on the cards...

But we know (and therefore we assume the Fed knows) that this 'target' is predicated on a conceptually broken data item that shows little to no improvement in reality

 

and inflation expectations (and realized) have been sliding notably...

 

And away from pure unemployment - the economic data is anything but improving...

 

so is it:

Reaction Function #2 - costs/benefits analysis is becoming skewed...

 

So - it's not just about the 'taper' decision but what is driving them to this decision. As asset-gatherers bluster about the fact that the Fed can't leave now because things are not that great (correctly) they are perhaps missing the key point that the Fed has changed its reaction function from fundamentals to technicals - and is worried...

Charts: Bloomberg and Barclays

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
dracos_ghost's picture

Who is this "A Few" person?

ekm's picture

People still believe that FOMC voting is a democracy.

Members are simply irrelevant.

 

Obama made it clear last night that White House rules over the FED and the Fed simply follows orders.

Bastiat's picture

Obama simply follows orders too.

francis_sawyer's picture

At the end of the line of all this supposed & suggested, "order following", by very assumption of the argument, is SOMEBODY giving orders...

~~~

The BLUEBUCK stops somewhere...

[Unless, of course, you're one of the numerous englightened comment makers on ZH that believes it's all just some crazy obfuscated 'order following' labyrinth contained in a perpetual motion machine ~ whereby, I'd be delighted to hear your LOGICAL explanation about how that perpetual motion machine works]... But go ahead & just junk my comment... After all ~ that's the path of least resistance [& really hammers home your point ~ whatever it is]...

nope-1004's picture

The FED can't taper.  Doing so will:

 

1)  kill equities markets and destroy pension values.

2)  remove liquidity from the large banking cabal, who are used to keep interest rates and PM's low in an effort to show USD strength

3)  remove liquidity from the Treasury purchase ponzi, where it is now going to finance government operations.

The .gov is full of shit.  The FED is full of shit.

On that note, is there any detailed accounting available to verify that they are injecting $85 Billion a month?  We are taking their word for it so far.  Could be $40 B/mo, or $120B/mo for all I know.

 

flacon's picture

The FED can't NOT taper.  NOT TAPERING will:

 

1)  kill equities markets and destroy pension values.

2)  remove liquidity from the large banking cabal, who are used to keep interest rates and PM's low in an effort to show USD strength

3)  remove liquidity from the Treasury purchase ponzi, where it is now going to finance government operations.

The .gov is full of shit.  The FED is full of shit.

On that note, is there any detailed accounting available to verify that they are injecting $85 Billion a month?  We are taking their word for it so far.  Could be $40 B/mo, or $120B/mo for all I know.

flacon's picture

Bernanke just fucked himself in his own ass just like Abe did. Fucked-himself-if-he-does, and fucked-himself-if-he-doesn't. 

gatorengineer's picture

He can simply blow the bubble bigger and leave it for Yellen or Krugman........

If you actually think about it, his logic move for Posterity would be to double down and go to 120B a month....  Leave at all time high market prices...

Justification -- Fiscal uncertainty about the budget ceiling... Of course all of my positions would be instantly vaporized on the ensuing 10% uptick....

 

 

fonzannoon's picture

Francis you think this market reflects the true underlying fundamentals of a budding economy?

francis_sawyer's picture

@fonz

~~~

Short Answer = NO

Medium/ Short answer = Especially since 'Jackson Hole 2010', but REALLY since "Subprime is Contained" comment [whereby shortly after Meredith Whitney nails Citi, Bear is gone, Lehman goes, 'Hank the Tank' arrives, TARP gets passed, Obama gets elected, "Dream Economic Teams" & Czars are appointed, & all the bullshit DIRECTLY leads to QE4EVA...

Medium Term Answer = It's been a fucking hockey stick since Nixon took the bluebuck off the gold standard

Long Term answer = It's all been bullshit since 1913 when a small group of private families [known for getting governments to wage wars against each other & pile on debt] were given the franchise to PRINT MONEY [for themselves, essentially]...

~~~

True answer: I don't know what a 'budding economy' is, or if one ever truly existed throughout history...I'm fairly sure that if a REAL economy ever DOES exist, there will be no 'economists' around to report it... Either that, or shortly thereafter there will be a tribe of greedy scumbags along to insert themselves in between the supply chains, skim profits for themselves off of other peoples risk & labor, leverage their profits into prominent banking, MSM, jurisprudence, & political activism positions, seize control of the banking industry, use the wealth to corrupt politicians, start wars that kill & maim hundreds of millions...

While that all happens, everybody will "ooh & aah" & and talk about "economic progress", all the great wonders that Keynesian economic systems produce... But as always, the whole thing will, after perhaps a century or more, all go up in smoke leaving billions displaced, & the environment & ecosystems in shambles... The perps, who are just a few [perhaps just 2% of 2%] will mosey on off to private islands & wait a few generations for the rubble to sort itself out before starting the whole wheel turning again...

 

FiatFobia's picture

FS, this may be your best post yet.  

CPL's picture

Not to be obtuse and generalize at all.  They are the people with the stuff and the things.  They know that guy that lives near the place.

cougar_w's picture

The guy who does that thing he does. You know? Just like last time.

CPL's picture

Like the other time with that group, best general event ever!!  Loved those things they served to everyone.

 

francis_sawyer's picture

I'm the guy behind the guy behind the guy...

Groundhog Day's picture

I am soooo fatigued by this market.  At this point i wish it would either go to 3000 or 30000.  either way i'll be out, rich or poor.

Yen Cross's picture

  The usd is oversold.  The 10 year gilt(gbp) auction raised yields and demand for gbp, short term. I'm taking another ride on the short gbp/aud railroad, when the price action rears it's beautiful head.

fonzannoon's picture

The greatest part about all this is that we all keep waiting for this rigged market to blow up, and when it does that will still have been rigged.

ekm's picture

Market is no longer rigged.

It is simply fully owned by primary dealers and pension funds, hence fully owned by the government.

 

No fundamentals or techincals matter.

fonzannoon's picture

the market is no longer rigged? You kiddin me?

ekm's picture

It is fully owned. It's gone way beyond rigging

Ham-bone's picture

EKM - not sure I can follow your logic...long leveraged "owners" seem to need be sure that somebody has there back...or else they would need to, Hedge (ie, sell to raise risk capital?).  Only by this rigging can they maintain / extend their leverage and maintain upward asset valuation movements.

ekm's picture

"RIGGING" means that there are still suckers ready to play.

 

If all suckers are gone, which they are, primary dealers are left with all stocks in their hands.

Federal Government is the hedge seller via Fed.

 

"rigging" is quite a misleading word at this stage.

"fully owned" is the correct term

fonzannoon's picture

When I say rigging I mean that when those orders you talk about are given, it won't be an accident what happens next.

ekm's picture

All preplanned. No accident whatsoever

francis_sawyer's picture

"Rigging", as in, it's a rigged assumption that the emperor is wearing clothes...

fonzannoon's picture

Are you kidding? As long as (almost) everyone is out there paying their taxes and using the dollar to transact business and playing their role the empror is wearing clothes.

francis_sawyer's picture

Yeah ~ & just about anyone who wants to can get a nightly blowjob from Christy Turlington just by using their computer...

Ham-bone's picture

EKM - take todays melt up in equities and knock down in hard commodities?  What shall we term this in front of an FOMC statement?  Owners buying up everyting not nailed down while selling everything hard and heavy?  On what news?  POMO?  Not rigging (those taking action know before hand the outcome and front run position in ever greater levering?

All about infinite leverage and being fore told the actions to allow ever greater leverage into these positions.  call it what ever feels good and we agree this is not a market but a centrally directed entity w/ many important actors colluding.

ekm's picture

Primary dealers selling the same batch of stocks to each other over and over and over.

 

Commodities are where a lot of the printed money has gone to, which has led to commodities storage, hence economy is starving, hence economy has been in contraction since oil crossed $90 2 years ago.

gatorengineer's picture

Today is nothing more than shorts getting juiced and PM stops being tested......

 

What will be interesting is how many Nano seconds before the Announcement do the Algos get the news.....

 

By the way the drop in commodities is pricing in tapering, and rise in markets is predicting a continued printing... diametrically opposed as usual....

insanelysane's picture

It is truly all about control; they can make it and they can break it.

Yen Cross's picture

     If the market blows up we all lose. Bond yields will fall in the dumpster initially. Then bonds will become "Duraflame firelogs".

fonzannoon's picture

"Gold drops on fears of fed taper"

"Equities and Bonds rally on belief fed taper talk is overblown"

What a joke.

Yen the question on the table is, if the market is fully owned, and a major firm needs to get sacraficed on the alter of JPM in order to barf up some securities back on the market....can we get through that without the whole thing blowing sky high? What say you?

Yen Cross's picture

    Fonz, you're an extremely intelligent, humble man. I hope to make your acquaintance some day.

 

     The market is about as fully owned as the NSA database. The moar sophistcated we we become, the moar out of control we are.

Bay of Pigs's picture

You see that JPM increased their SLV position by 500% fonz?

fonzannoon's picture

Hey BOP no I have not seen that. Can you throw me the link?

I gotta be honest. I have not changed my mind about anything, but I am done getting caught up in physical inventory reads. Or who increased what etc. I just believe that this whoe thing is just a giant bag of shit at this point that just keeps getting bigger. Something will come along soooner or later and pop it.

Bay of Pigs's picture

http://www.silverdoctors.com/alert-jp-morgan-increases-slv-holdings-by-500/

Banksters appear to be getting long now while trashing the metals to the public at large. (If we can trust these numbers, lol).

 

Bastiat's picture

Maybe they need those shares to sell to Comex for delivery in lieu of bullion.

slaughterer's picture

Taper as Technical Reaction Function to Over-Tepperization.

insanelysane's picture

When you're headed for a cliff, it is usually best, to take your foot off of the accelerator.

gatorengineer's picture

You never saw Thelma and Louise did you?

jjsilver's picture

I think they are the only ones left who believe their propoganda to deflect away from their criminal activities

Bryan's picture

<=6.5% unemployment?  Simple, just change the formula so it says "6.5%" and voila, all fixed. 

>=2% inflation?   Easy, just change the formula to exclude anything that has less than 2% price inflation. 

 

Geez, I should run for office.

Bay of Pigs's picture

Exactly.

"and inflation expectations (and realized) have been sliding notably..."

What kind of bullshit is this anyway? Pitiful.