This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

'Chiraq' Update: Illinois Overturns Ban On Concealed Weapons

Tyler Durden's picture





 

"Following a weekend of horrific violence in Chicago in which at least 70 people were shot and 12 killed, this was the wrong move for public safety in Illinois," Democratic Governor Jim Quinn noted as lawmakers overturned his veto to allow Illinois to become the last state in the US to allow residents to carry concealed handguns. As the BBC reports, the governor warned that the new law will allow people to carry guns in pubs and bars (and carry virtual arsenals on their persons), we suspect, if Chi-raq (the slang for the anarchic gang-ridden areas of Chicago) is any example, that this is already occurring en masse in a wide population of the state. Gun rights proponents, meanwhile, celebrated, "this is a historic, significant day for law-abiding gun owners, they finally get to exercise their Second Amendment rights."

Via BBC,

Illinois has become the last state in the US to allow residents to carry concealed handguns, after lawmakers overrode the governor's veto.

 

...

 

Mr Quinn vigorously opposed a concealed carry law, but the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal.

 

...

 

On Tuesday, legislators in the House and Senate easily mustered a two-thirds majority needed to override Mr Quinn's veto, barely beating the court deadline.

 

...

 

"Following a weekend of horrific violence in Chicago in which at least 70 people were shot and 12 killed, this was the wrong move for public safety in Illinois," Mr Quinn said in a statement after the vote.

 

He said legislators had "surrendered" to the National Rifle Association, a powerful gun rights lobby funded in part by weapons manufacturers.

He warned the new law would allow people to carry guns in pubs and bars, and allow people to carry virtual arsenals on their persons.

Gun rights proponents, meanwhile, celebrated.

"This is a historic, significant day for law-abiding gun owners,'' Representative Brandon Harris, a southern Illinois Democrat said, according to the Associated Press.

Referring to the clause in the US constitution that refers to gun ownership, he said, "They finally get to exercise their Second Amendment rights."

 


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:36 | Link to Comment Chupacabra-322
Chupacabra-322's picture

Lock & load Chicagoens. Just watch how the crime rate drops & blows all the anti gun grabbers arguments of how guns create crime out of the water.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:42 | Link to Comment maxmad
maxmad's picture

Heres the kicker  If you dont have a FOID card already, you're Fuked!

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:51 | Link to Comment Almost Solvent
Almost Solvent's picture

But - guns don't kill people, people kill people.

 

Once we outlaw people, we'll all be safe!

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:57 | Link to Comment Bazza McKenzie
Bazza McKenzie's picture

Obama's working on that.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:48 | Link to Comment Manthong
Manthong's picture

Within 12 months, the gun death rate in the city will drop by half…

Shove that up your butt,  Rahm..

Er.. Rahm that up your butt, Barak.

oo.. oo .. and up your quim,  Quinn...  :-D

Whatever..

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:48 | Link to Comment whotookmyalias
whotookmyalias's picture

If they are a shall issue state, they now have it better than many other states including CA and NY.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:13 | Link to Comment Manthong
Manthong's picture

The new law says that Illinois state police "shall issue" a permit to carry concealed guns to any applicant who passes a background check, takes 16 hours of required firearms training and meets other conditions. The bill would ban guns in some public places such as bars, schools and hospitals

http://news.yahoo.com/illinois-house-votes-allow-carrying-concealed-guns-182937243.html

..there is hope left for this state and nation

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:22 | Link to Comment KnightTakesKing
KnightTakesKing's picture

16 hours of training? That's a lot of training.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:35 | Link to Comment tsx500
tsx500's picture

and don't forget the huge $$ fees for applying and taking the class, etc

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:23 | Link to Comment WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot's picture

Chiraq (and NY and a few others) could burn to the ground and I would not have a f*ck left to give. Just sayin'. Net benefit to society.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:36 | Link to Comment fourchan
fourchan's picture

outlaw blacks...im just saying.

and ban muslims from air travel.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:47 | Link to Comment WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot's picture

Unrealistic, but sadly probably true.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 07:26 | Link to Comment JohnnyBriefcase
JohnnyBriefcase's picture

Chicongo is a superior name.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:25 | Link to Comment Antifaschistische
Antifaschistische's picture

Manthong....all other things being equal I would say you're exactly right.   But "all other things" are never equal.

The gun grabbers CAN'T let this happen and you can guarantee something will be manipulated to make sure this doesn't happen.  Either the stats will be manipulated upward, or Obama has the NSA sniping street side drug dealers just to keep the gun crime stats up.   Nothing surprises me any more.

 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:57 | Link to Comment Manthong
Manthong's picture

understand ..  kind of like LIBOR.. LBE... and the rest of that stuff..

nothing would surprise me anymoar either... but this is a big deal here in the obamanation of the land of Lincoln.  Everything has a price .. 16 hours and a few hundred bucks is a small price to pay for liberty, security and a few degrees moar of protection in an increasingly diverse and unpredictable world. .and for whatever it is worth.. I have sincere prayers that God would not deign  I would ever have to be in a position to even think about shooting at anything other than a target, varmint, or game … just my 2c    ..  have faith.

..and one way ot the other, soon,  the news will be more quiet about the stats in Chi-town.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:38 | Link to Comment Doubleguns
Doubleguns's picture

Easy to shoot at targets and all,  but when your wife or kid is threatened you can still stand there idle, your choice. I have practiced and intend to shoot. The brudens are heavy but the regrets are heavier. 

 

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:42 | Link to Comment Doubleguns
Doubleguns's picture

Oops, missed the part that you pray it never happens. I agree and pray for both of us to never go therer, but like most I will if called upon with no remorse.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 10:07 | Link to Comment whirling tword ...
whirling tword freedom's picture

I used to think that I would defend my property with deadly force.  ( You're able to in Texas if it's after dark )....  Unless all the wheels come off, I'm not sure I would do so anymore after watching the Zimmerman trial.

I may put one or two into the knee caps... or brandish but, I'm pretty sure I would not use deadly force over property with intent to kill.  ( unless the wheels came off or they were inside my home )

I live outside city limits and, I have a lot of equipment outside and on the property.... not sure it would be worth it if I found myself in that situation...

If they're in the house, they're bought and payed for, however.

I hope and pray that never happens....  too much hurt on both sides of that equasion.

Always have and always will be a, "gun nut" though.  Grew up in the shooting sports and still love it.... load my own ( when components are available ) and hope this shortage ends soon....   

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 21:30 | Link to Comment Promethus
Promethus's picture

Las Vegas rule. What happens on private property stays on private property.Put the body in a wood chipper. Eat the Skittles. Let the fambly file a missing persons report.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 07:41 | Link to Comment j0nx
j0nx's picture

Chicago's problems are solved by recalling rahm. It's quite obvious to everyone even the MSM that dude has no idea wtf he is doing or how to run a city.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 09:24 | Link to Comment 1100-TACTICAL-12
1100-TACTICAL-12's picture

Aint gonna happen it's mostly gang banger anyway they don't give a shit if it's legal or not. It will ultimately help some honest people..

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:00 | Link to Comment pods
pods's picture

Can we please stop this "law-abiding" moniker?

Fucken Orwellian.

I can't count how many laws I broke today, mainly because I have no fucking clue as to how many there are, or how I broke them.

Yet we will all rejoice that our benevolent masters have now allowed us to do something that we told them, SPECIFICALLY, that they may not interfere with.

pods

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:04 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

"Yet we will all rejoice that our benevolent masters have now allowed us to do something that we told them, SPECIFICALLY, that they may not interfere with."

+ nine more.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:35 | Link to Comment francis_sawyer
francis_sawyer's picture

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms

~~~

There to protect your right to get drunk, light up, & go shootin'...

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:36 | Link to Comment WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot's picture

Word. You three are free to speak for me on ZH if I'm absent for a few days. 

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:07 | Link to Comment U4 eee aaa
U4 eee aaa's picture

You expecting a rendition?

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:58 | Link to Comment Manic by Proxy
Manic by Proxy's picture

Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms: definitely should be the name of convenience store and not a government agency. It says so on a T-shirt.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 02:54 | Link to Comment Manthong
Manthong's picture

LMAO   :-D

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 07:11 | Link to Comment kill switch
kill switch's picture

When you think about it what the fuck do we need with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Another 100,000.00 useless bureaucrats. Man we are fucked 6,9,12,3.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:23 | Link to Comment xtop23
xtop23's picture

Great post.

All part of the plan. If you put into place so many laws, as to make it impossible to follow them all, you enable "the apparatus" to commit rear entry on your person any time they get the urge to do so.

 

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:07 | Link to Comment yomama
yomama's picture

Come on, if anything this administration has shown us that the laws are just a guideline, nothing 'hard and fast'....hard and fast, Obama, bent-over...um

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:10 | Link to Comment linniepar
linniepar's picture

*knocks it out the park*

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:07 | Link to Comment aerojet
aerojet's picture

Seriously, I've never been a big fan of laws since the whole legal system is just another angle on you and when you need something enforced against some asshole, you can't get it done.  Also, there's the people like the NSA and the CIA, the executors of the law who break the law day in and day out with no ramifications because some special court or circumstantial loophole allows them to have clean hands.  It's still unethical, though, you see?  And that's what really matters is how you live with yourself after you pilot a drone and launch a Hellfire at some civilian house which may or may not house "bad people."  

So no, until the law can be made to make sense, I'm just avoiding the enforcers quite honestly.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 07:14 | Link to Comment kill switch
kill switch's picture

pods,

Thinking the same thing +100

So nice we have our second amendment back, now brush off your knees..ya fucking sheep.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 10:12 | Link to Comment whirling tword ...
whirling tword freedom's picture

We are at a point where the state has made so many laws that it makes criminals out of every man.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:46 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

It will be interesting to see how punk criminals react to the prospect that granny is packing and now doesn't have to look over her shoulder for criminals AND COPS. 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:15 | Link to Comment Alpo for Granny
Alpo for Granny's picture

There is a lot more than just gold eagles in granny's brassiere... Buh-lee-dat!

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:00 | Link to Comment zjxn06
zjxn06's picture

NRA should get with arms manufacturers to offer discounted guns for ghetto grannies. Get ghetto grannies a gun. GGGG.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 10:14 | Link to Comment Meat Hammer
Meat Hammer's picture

"Ahhhhhh shiiiiiiiit" - Little Pookie, Ray Ray, and Leroy (aka Tech 9 Killa) upon hearing that there will be some pissed off armed crackers now in their midst.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:16 | Link to Comment Greenie
Greenie's picture

The Trayvons in Chi-town ain't gonna like this. Go short hoodies.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:19 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

WTF????  Trayvon didn't have a gun idiot!

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:07 | Link to Comment mofreedom
mofreedom's picture

and if he did he wouldn't know how to use it properly...probably would have thought it was some type of crack pipe, cool.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:09 | Link to Comment aerojet
aerojet's picture

What about the cellphone picture of the S&W Sigma?  Planted evidence?  Even if he didn't have a gun with him, he was still a violent little thug who was looking for trouble.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 10:06 | Link to Comment They trynna cat...
They trynna catch me ridin dirty's picture

No sh*t "Tray" didn't have a gun. But if all the Trayvons had to assume that every potential victim of their animal violence was carrying, they wouldn't be so quick to punch old ladies in the face for $5.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 10:35 | Link to Comment Meat Hammer
Meat Hammer's picture

It warms the cockles of my heart to think of these thugs worried about people fighting back.

In other news, job applications at Walmart by former gang bangers just went full retard.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:38 | Link to Comment tsx500
tsx500's picture

...and Skittles

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:21 | Link to Comment holdbuysell
holdbuysell's picture

Empower the people to take care of themselves...and they will.

But that mere concept goes against the 'must control everything and everyone' grain of sociopathic elites.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 07:16 | Link to Comment kill switch
kill switch's picture

AND COPS

Fucking BINGO!!!!!

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:48 | Link to Comment Alpo for Granny
Alpo for Granny's picture

Pretty badass gif showing the progression from no issue to may issue to shall issuee to my personal favorite..unrestricted.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/96/Rtc2.gif

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:27 | Link to Comment XitSam
XitSam's picture

In stupid Texas, you can't open carry a pistol in a holster! And yet they pretend to be conservative and part of the West. 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:19 | Link to Comment Freddie
Freddie's picture

Vermont is one of the most liberal and I think they allow open carry.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:11 | Link to Comment XitSam
XitSam's picture

I don't know why open carry isn't the standard with concealed carry (if it must be) more restricted.  People freak out if they see a peacefully and lawfully carried firearm.  Yet they remain calm when every person they see, including criminals, could be carrying concealed.  To me that seems backwards.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 07:18 | Link to Comment kill switch
kill switch's picture

ALASKA!!!

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:53 | Link to Comment Manic by Proxy
Manic by Proxy's picture

Yeah, well they also gave us "Vermont Teddy Bears". I hate Vermont Teddy Bears. So, fuck Vermont and the Bear they rode in on. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 09:59 | Link to Comment DanDaley
DanDaley's picture

Vermont has some of the best gun laws in SPITE of the liberals, not because of them. It's a constant battle against libtardism.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:11 | Link to Comment aerojet
aerojet's picture

Even in the 1890s, there were restrictions on open carry.  It came about for practical reasons.  I also think that people desired the appearance of a more civilized domain since anarchy was pretty much the rule.  It's comforting--the same reason we have the stupid laws we have today.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 12:37 | Link to Comment NoTTD
NoTTD's picture

All Hail Vermont!

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 16:25 | Link to Comment de3de8
de3de8's picture

POS Maryland always last for individual rights/ privacyy

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:49 | Link to Comment Montecarlo
Montecarlo's picture

I guess now that citizens can protect themselves, we don't need to add more police and more benefits to those "risk" takers willing to stop the violence. Now Illinois residents will discover what Texans have known all along - police are there to report on what happened...after the fact.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:12 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

Well your comment on police is certainly true. Give anybody too much trust and power and THEY become the criminals.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:30 | Link to Comment Montecarlo
Montecarlo's picture

I've worked in Law Enforcement - you speak the truth... Check out the Stanford Prison Study... random people assigned as guards or inmates.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 07:54 | Link to Comment Big Slick
Big Slick's picture

interesting wiki article monte carlo. thanks .

 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:31 | Link to Comment otto skorzeny
otto skorzeny's picture

The jackbooted swine in the IL State Police are now going to drag their feet for awhile before they get this get this implemented- just like they are still arresting people for videotaping them even though the courts told them it was legal to do so.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:42 | Link to Comment Antifaschistische
Antifaschistische's picture

yah, I remember when...if you ran a stop sign in front of a cop you may as well just pull over and wait for him to pull up behind you.  Now, I've discovered the last two dozen times I violated some law in front of a sitting policeman....nothing happened, because he always has his head down in his i-phone or other portable electronic device of choice.   It's great.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:56 | Link to Comment Montecarlo
Montecarlo's picture

http://lifeboatsupplies.com/2013/06/27/things-every-gun-owner-should-know/

 

Do you know what to do after you've applied your firearm to handle a situation? You should.

 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:02 | Link to Comment pods
pods's picture

Lemme guess?

1.  I WANT A LAWYER.

pods

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:04 | Link to Comment Scro
Scro's picture

Deadly force is justified only when undertaken to prevent imminent and otherwise unavoidable danger of death or grave bodily harm to the innocent.

Or loss of property.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:30 | Link to Comment XitSam
XitSam's picture

Deadly force cannot be used in my state to defend property.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:08 | Link to Comment IndyPat
IndyPat's picture

My state includes deafening the lives of others and preventing sexual assault.
Also...firearms may not be confiscated in times of state and national emergency.
Not that I'd pony them up anyway. Kind of redundant.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:13 | Link to Comment aerojet
aerojet's picture

Probably un-ass the area as quickly as possible if you weren't captured on camera.  That's getting harder and harder to know, of course.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 07:28 | Link to Comment shovelhead
shovelhead's picture

Easy one.

Drop the gun and take the cannolis...

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:10 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

Now we can see what happens, so we can end this debate.

BTW, any theories about why the murder rate is so much lower in Canada where they have tough gun-control laws? 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:30 | Link to Comment GernB
GernB's picture

Well, to make an intellegent comment I'd have to know what other factors affect the murder rate and how they compare. For example, I have no idea how population density relates to murder rate and how Canada's population density compares to the US. Too many factors can affect murder rate such as culture. Why does India where arranged mariages are common have a much lower rate of divorce?

In the end, I think the only fair comparison is the same area before and after strictgun control laws.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:16 | Link to Comment zen0
zen0's picture

Liquor is much more expensive in Canada.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 10:19 | Link to Comment Meat Hammer
Meat Hammer's picture

Because the boat brought them here and not there.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:30 | Link to Comment a growing concern
a growing concern's picture

Population demographics, eh?

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:46 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

To be clear, I said murder RATE (as in ratio). Places like Southern Ontario and British Columbia are similar in population density (and culture). And comparisons to arranged marriages in India is a little too far out.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:53 | Link to Comment GernB
GernB's picture

Bzzt wrong. I can use Wikipedia. Population density in US is 88.09 people per square kilometer. Canada is 3.75 people per square kilometer. Gun violence is higher in areas of higher population density. The point is, in case you're too dense to get it, that you are comparing apples and oranges.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:07 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

Dipshit, that calculation is on paper only. Are there actually 88.09 people living on every square kilometer in the US? Or do a large number live in cities? Fuck you are dumb.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:13 | Link to Comment mofreedom
mofreedom's picture

let me guess again, you only let gays into canda, they hate guns that go scary bang.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:24 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

gays? where did that come from? Yep, there's certainly a phallus/closet homosexual element to you gun nuts.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:32 | Link to Comment mofreedom
mofreedom's picture

nope, just hate pansies and folks who suck british and french cock, sorry, no offense.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:48 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

So that's the visual that you come up with? Yep, pretty fucking gay if you ask me. No offense.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:53 | Link to Comment mofreedom
mofreedom's picture

one more time, maybe because canada doesn't let the dregs of the earth overtake it's country all in the name of vote harvesting...love canada really, except the french part.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:57 | Link to Comment mofreedom
mofreedom's picture

do y'all still brew molson xxx?

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 07:27 | Link to Comment hyperbole2000
hyperbole2000's picture

Canjuns don't need a gun to kick ass. Unless your outnumbered or its a #*&@ bar. 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:10 | Link to Comment mofreedom
mofreedom's picture

cause you control you gimme pigs with free beer and pot?

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:21 | Link to Comment Hongcha
Hongcha's picture

garypaul, "Demographics".

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:27 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

hmmm, I think I detect what you mean when you say "Demographics". You're right though, it's possible I might have a different tune if I lived in an "inner-city" type environment.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 06:19 | Link to Comment noless
noless's picture

Next time just scream DAS RAYCISS, it'll make it easier on everyone.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 01:14 | Link to Comment U4 eee aaa
U4 eee aaa's picture

They have gun control laws in Mexico also and I think the murder rate is a little higher than the US

Maybe it comes down to how hard the law enforcement works to deal with thugs

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 11:13 | Link to Comment hoos bin pharteen
hoos bin pharteen's picture

If you normalize the results by socio-economic demographic, Canada and the US aren't too different. 

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 12:46 | Link to Comment NoTTD
NoTTD's picture

Because outside of a very few urban areas, the population of Canada is overwhelmingly white?  Just a guess.

 

You might want to compare that "demographic" to Chicago where until this bill passed, no gun ownership was allowed.  And you see what we got. 

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 21:38 | Link to Comment Promethus
Promethus's picture

Most Canadians are white.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:18 | Link to Comment Hongcha
Hongcha's picture

Quinn carrying the water for the Administration, currying favor at the expense of the safety of his citizens; got his legislation pounded back up where it belongs.  

I am SO sick of these corrupt hand-lickers holding public power.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:43 | Link to Comment Dingleberry
Dingleberry's picture

Shitcago......another liberal oasis.

They fucking have to plan safe-zones so kids can walk to school without getting hit by gangbanging gunfire.

Their corrupt LIBERAL DEMOCRAT political machine promises OPM for votes from welfare mommas, illegals and public unions.

Not only Chiraq but the entire state is beyond broke. Even worse than Detroit.  

I say let them suffer the consequences. Reality is a bitch, but apparently consequences are the only things these fucking liberals will ever understand.  Then again, they are liberals.....

Lock and load Chicongoans. Things are going to get far worse. 

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 09:09 | Link to Comment Agent P
Agent P's picture

Take it from this downstater that the only reason the entire state is beyond broke is because Springfield is run by the Libtards from the Northeast quadrant.  If Cook County were to fall into the lake, this state would instantly rival Texas in redness on a political map.

As for your lock and load advice to the folks in Chitown, I couldn't agree more.  This bill will do nothing to stem the thug-on-thug violence in the South and West neighborhoods, and that problem will only grow and spill further into the thug-on-innocent category as the economic picture continues to flush down the shitter.  However, I think it will be a huge improvement for crime prevention in some of the larger towns downstate that have seen an influx of the bad elements leaking out of Chicago...even if it doesn't, at least it brings us closer in-line with the Constitution, to which I say it's about fucking time!

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 11:08 | Link to Comment Dull Care
Dull Care's picture

I feel bad for the downstate. My family was from there and the area is full of decent people. It's such a shame they have to put up with the Chicago crowd. Is there any kind of secession movement?

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 12:07 | Link to Comment Agent P
Agent P's picture

Yes, people are moving away all the time.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 03:28 | Link to Comment solgundy
solgundy's picture

what's the bag limit on democrats???????????????????????

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 05:43 | Link to Comment Flagit
Flagit's picture

who the fuck is "Jim" Quinn?

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 09:13 | Link to Comment Agent P
Agent P's picture

Must be Patricia's brother.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 09:15 | Link to Comment rwe2late
rwe2late's picture

 Crime, and criminals using guns, will not significantly drop until

(A) Prohibition II (the "war" on drugs) is ended,

(B) decent jobs as an alternative to the drug trade exist

 

Illinois, the home of Prohibition I gangsters like Al Capone ought to know that. Prohibition I was just a poor excuse for the expansion of the FBI and police powers. So too, and worse, has been Prohibition II.

No significant change would have occurred by either allowing or banning tommy guns.

Prohibition I had to end.

So too, must Prohibition II end.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 09:55 | Link to Comment Winston Smith 2009
Winston Smith 2009's picture

"Lock & load Chicagoens. Just watch how the crime rate drops & blows all the anti gun grabbers arguments of how guns create crime out of the water."

That would be nice, but from what I've read the violence is mostly black on black violence where CCW isn't going to help because those involved in the shootings are already carrying illegally as gang bangers.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 11:46 | Link to Comment DosZap
DosZap's picture

Lock & load Chicagoens. Just watch how the crime rate drops & blows all the anti gun grabbers arguments of how guns create crime out of the water.

 

THEY do not care about the blacks and hispanic bangers and drug dealers dying(and the occasional innocents capped standing by get ALL the major press), all the morons have to do is CHECK the stats on Pre CCP states crime rates v.s. AFTER Shall Issue takes effect.But, we are dealing with Progressives here remember,and facts DO not matter.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:42 | Link to Comment otto skorzeny
otto skorzeny's picture

Fuck you Quinn and every Democrat and RINO in this corrupt, broke, union-controlled, nanny/police state (and you too Durbin and Kirk and Twinkle Toes Rahm)

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:45 | Link to Comment max2205
max2205's picture

FYI, it's Pat Quinn....

Oh and fuck you Pat

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:51 | Link to Comment otto skorzeny
otto skorzeny's picture

I know it is- I think you were trying to reply to Buckaroo B

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:20 | Link to Comment max2205
max2205's picture

No, it was in the article...no offense

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:29 | Link to Comment Lendo
Lendo's picture

+1

Illinois is past the point of no return since the pension clusterfuck will never be solved.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:27 | Link to Comment Freddie
Freddie's picture

Oh IL pension nightmare will be "solved" someday.  Either insolvency or some sickening bailout.

I have relative in a southern state who has a psycho retired Chicago civil servant on their street.  They would love to see this evil ****ers pension blow up.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:15 | Link to Comment mofreedom
mofreedom's picture

otto, you're you a fine german after my adopted mother...not a sniveling gay nazi.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:38 | Link to Comment jon dough
jon dough's picture

Mr. Quinn is now apparently threatening to hold his breath until he turns blue.

 

Like the gang bangers aren't already carrying virtual arsenals now.

 

 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:17 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

So you're saying that it will be safer to have these gang-bangers carrying legally??

 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:37 | Link to Comment Jam Akin
Jam Akin's picture

You think the gang-bangers are in compliance with the already strict IL gun laws today fool?   Not a single one of them is in legal possession of their firearms, not to mention the pending even stricter qualification for a carry permit! 

Provisions of the new law:

 

Section 25. Qualifications for a license. 

The Department shall issue a license to an applicant 

completing an application in accordance with Section 30 of this 

Act if the person: 

(1) is at least 21 years of age; 

(2) has a currently valid Firearm Owner's 

Identification Card and at the time of application meets 

the requirements for the issuance of a Firearm Owner's 

Identification Card and is not prohibited under the Firearm 

Owners Identification Card Act or federal law from 

possessing or receiving a firearm; 

(3) has not been convicted or found guilty in this 

State or in any other state of: 

(A) a misdemeanor involving the use or threat of 

physical force or violence to any person within the 5 

years preceding the date of the license application; or 

(B) 2 or more violations related to driving while 

under the influence of alcohol, other drug or drugs, 

intoxicating compound or compounds, or any combination 

thereof, within the 5 years preceding the date of the 

license application; and 

(4) is not the subject of a pending arrest warrant, 

prosecution, or proceeding for an offense or action that 

 

could lead to disqualification to own or possess a firearm; 

(5) has not been in residential or court-ordered 

treatment for alcoholism, alcohol detoxification, or drug 

treatment within the 5 years immediately preceding the date 

of the license application; and 

(6) has completed firearms training and any education 

component required under Section 75 of this Act. 


 


 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:32 | Link to Comment Totentänzerlied
Totentänzerlied's picture

What part of "no misdemeanors and a valid license (FOID)" don't you understand, shill?

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:09 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

That's a great point about qualifying before getting gun ownership. But I just recently watched a news documentary that showed how many ex-military are joing gangs. In other words, there's a lot of "criminals" out there that would still pass those legal requirements to gun ownership.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:22 | Link to Comment Jam Akin
Jam Akin's picture

Funniest comment of the night!  Someone who intends to join a gang is going to fill out an application and send it with a check for $10 to the Illinois State Police(!) to get a FOID card!

You're killing me.  "The authorities" ought to confiscate your computer.  It is a deadly weapon...

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 05:45 | Link to Comment Flagit
Flagit's picture

the computer is harmless. its the keyboard thats dangerous.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:06 | Link to Comment funthea
funthea's picture

Gary, I think you miss the forest through the trees. The point is that gun regulation of any kind only affects the law abiding citizen and not the criminal. The criminal is already packing and sees every regulation that diminishes the active public from defending themselves against him to be a blessing. It simply empowers him more, since he has no use of your silly laws. You need a new set of goggles...

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 06:30 | Link to Comment noless
noless's picture

How does a "gang" operate in your worldview?

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:32 | Link to Comment Debt Slave
Debt Slave's picture

What makes you think they will bother to get the CCW?

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:32 | Link to Comment a growing concern
a growing concern's picture

You can't be a felon and carry legally.  Ergo, none of those gang-bangers will be carrying legally.  They'll be carrying illegally, just like they already do now.  Idiot.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:40 | Link to Comment Greenie
Greenie's picture

Gary, you really need to go suck a bag of dicks

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 05:36 | Link to Comment vato poco
vato poco's picture

+++++++++

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:16 | Link to Comment OneTinSoldier66
OneTinSoldier66's picture

"So you're saying that it will be safer to have these gang-bangers carrying legally??"

 

If you make it criminal for people to own guns, then guess who will own all the guns? Guess who will have more power than you? Criminals. If it is known you have a gun you are much less likely to become a target and/or a victim. So it is good for people to have the ability to get one if they so choose. That way a criminal at least has to always wonder if you might be carrying an equalizer...

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:32 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

Like I said before, I might have a different viewpoint if I lived in a high-crime area. But I'm just saying that there are lots of pre-criminals (and smooth criminals) out there that would legally qualify for gun ownership. But more important than that, how many "law-biding" people out there have some sort of paranoia or other unrecognized mental problem? 

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:18 | Link to Comment funthea
funthea's picture

If the law-abiding citizen has the ability to defend himself from these mentals, then it all sorts itself out.

No one can safegaurd from every danger possible, nor should we try. That is the true paranoia. And that is all these silly laws try to do, is pacify the paranoid.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:23 | Link to Comment IndyPat
IndyPat's picture

Did you really just say pre crime and smooth criminal as part of your argument?
Free advice my friend from the great white north.
Mind thee own beeswax, eh? This is a family matter.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 06:32 | Link to Comment noless
noless's picture

This motherfucker be obvious. Obvious troll is obvious.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 00:29 | Link to Comment yomama
yomama's picture

How many police 'have some sort of paranoia or other unrecognized mental problem'?  They shoot dogs don't they?  Also, if your depending on those same police to protect you, I've got some sorry news for ya......you have NO legal right to police protection.  None. Nada. Find a successful lawsuit brought by a free citizen against a policemen, police department, city, county, state, or any government agency on the basis of 'Failure to Protect'.  Police are armed to protect their butts not your sorry ass.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 02:20 | Link to Comment StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

[quote]...how many "law-biding" people out there have some sort of paranoia or other unrecognized mental problem?[/quote] 

Non Sequitir, you're assuming facts NOT in evidence (or projecting).

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 04:43 | Link to Comment Morla
Morla's picture

Yup, fear and distrust your fellow man like a good little statist. You trust ordinary people HUNDREDS OF TIMES ON A GIVEN DAY to pilot 4,000lb metal objects at high speeds right next to you, but don't get bogged down with intellectual honesty. Keep telling us how our neighbors are "pre-criminals" and maniacs.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 05:54 | Link to Comment Flagit
Flagit's picture

ok, i greened you, because they apparently they dont know how it works. it takes a smooth criminal to buy the guns in the first place, then resells them.

shit, a wasted green at that. paranoia or unrecognized mental problem?

yea, you must live in Naperville or Bolingbrook. Faggot. you dont get robbed because you dont go out after dark, or anywhere that dosent serve latte. ive heard this retoric before. "i just dont understand why you have to arm yourself." well, you are gonna have to take a few rides in an ambulance before you figure that out.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 09:20 | Link to Comment Agent P
Agent P's picture

"Like the gang bangers aren't already carrying virtual arsenals now."

Indeed, they are...and God help us if they ever learn how to shoot straight.

"Following a weekend of horrific violence in Chicago in which at least 70 people were shot and 12 killed..."

(12 / 70 = 17%....and this doesn't even count the misses)

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:38 | Link to Comment Buckaroo Banzai
Buckaroo Banzai's picture

SUCK IT, Jim Quinn. In a just world, you'd be tried for treason, and shot at dawn.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 05:57 | Link to Comment Flagit
Flagit's picture

again, who the fuck is "jim" quinn?

mayor jim juliani.

governor jim ventura.

president jim obama.

admiral jim kirk.

like SNL said, its Pat!

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 12:51 | Link to Comment NoTTD
NoTTD's picture

And Pat could be of either sex...

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:41 | Link to Comment Al Gorerhythm
Al Gorerhythm's picture

 

 

"On Tuesday, legislators in the House and Senate easily mustered a two-thirds majority needed to override Mr Quinn's veto, barely beating the court deadline.

 

...

 

"Following a weekend of horrific violence in Chicago in which at least 70 people were shot and 12 killed, this was the wrong move for public safety in Illinois," Mr Quinn said in a statement after the vote.

 

He said legislators had "surrendered" to the National Rifle Association, a powerful gun rights lobby funded in part by weapons manufacturers."

 

Isn't it funny how  once you get popularly elected, you become the smartest guy in the room, despite the numbers opposing you.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:45 | Link to Comment jon dough
jon dough's picture

I have to agree with Quinn on one thing, though.

 

This really was the wrong move for public safety in Illinois.

 

It should be OPEN CARRY!

 

Hey, lookee here, butt-nugget thug mofo, want a taste of this? Yeah, run away, little man, run away...

 

 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:50 | Link to Comment NoDebt
NoDebt's picture

That's been tried before here and there.  It's usually pulled back in short order because it works too well, crime rates plummet and threaten union jobs.

 

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 23:34 | Link to Comment Freddie
Freddie's picture

Isn't CCW almost as effective?  I thought once the gangsters know people can carry they start to think twice.   Anyone can be carrying with CCW but I hear you.    Is VT the only open carry state?  I thought AZ allowed it in some areas.  Someone mentioned a few towns in Oregon.

Thu, 07/11/2013 - 12:52 | Link to Comment NoTTD
NoTTD's picture

Believe it or not CA is open carry.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:42 | Link to Comment Boondocker
Boondocker's picture

Roughly 90% of shootings are same race shootings.....

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 21:51 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

So it will be the same ratio then...only a lower body count.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:24 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

So why's the "body count" so much lower in Canada? Seriously fucker, I want an answer on this question from one of you wingnuts!

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:37 | Link to Comment GernB
GernB's picture

I don't know. Fewer large cities maybe? Less inner city gang activity. Fewer racial problems. Greater economic freedom. Less income disparity. Hard to say.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:41 | Link to Comment 20834A
20834A's picture

Maybe because the population of Canada is 34,568,211 people in 3.8 million miles. The population of the USA is 316,668,567 people in 3.79 million square miles. Like those studies of crowded rats that turn on each other.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:54 | Link to Comment garypaul
garypaul's picture

That's not a good answer. I'm talking about ratios, percentages. Also, the people are not spread evenly throughout the large landmass. The majority live in large urban centers, for example Southern Ontario which is indistinguishable from an American city.

Wed, 07/10/2013 - 22:58 | Link to Comment Iocosus
Iocosus's picture

Everyone is reluctant to say it like it is, so I will:

IT'S THE GANGBANGERS, GARY. IT'S TOO COLD UP THERE FOR THEM, DON'T YA KNOW.

 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!