This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
You Are Here
For every man, woman, and child in America, the country's debt load amounts to over $50,000 each. As Bloomberg BusinessWeek notes, the national debt has not always been the hot-button issue it is today. In the Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, and Carter administrations, inflation-adjusted debt per capita dropped. Let's revisit this chart afer 3 more years of hope-and-change, when total US debt is over $20 trillion.
and while this is surging (and clearly unsustainable), compared to much of Europe, it remains low...
Edited from Bloomberg
- 25061 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -




Listen up all you foreign investors in U.S. Treasurys, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again….
I’m already planning to default on my share.
And no, I’m not telling you where I hid the gold I bought with the proceeds.
"Greed, is good" - Gordon Gekko
"Debt, is good" - our current leaders
Re: our current leaders
Yeah, and for the last 60+ years. It worked for a LONG time. Why would anybody change now.
FORWARD !!!
Lean Forward!!
and grab your ankles!
Looks like that free Euro health care ain't all that free.
Imagine that.
Re: Looks like that free Euro health care ain't all that free.
Neither is OldFartMedicare, but that doesn't stop them from bitching about ObamaCare.
Duplicity, ask for it by name.
We've all done this. You're at a ballgame/match drinking canned beer. You drink the beer and set it next to your seat.
The quarter/inning ends and you get up to buy a new round of beers for your buddies. You move the empty beer can you drank out of 20 minutes ago, it spills down your leg while you're checking to see how much cash you have.
That's pretty much the Fed. <> ECB relationship. then you look over your shoulder at the BIS assholes in the skybox laughing at you!
BTST (Been There Spilled That).
I like truthiness!
I think I got em for more than that.
People paying into Soc Sec?.....still? LMAO
$50,000?
If I write a check can I have my sovereignty and my Bill of Rights back?
I find it amusing that there are still so many idiots on ZH who believe that the GOP and DEMS are anything but a good cop bad cop con.
Are you people FUCKING STUPID?
Your politicians are whores - they are owned by corporations and special interests. Doesn't matter which party - every single last one of them is a stooge - kept under control by campaign contributions and NSA surveillance.
I see so many posts on ZH pouncing dems and glorifying Repubs. C'mon people - just look at the chart above and tell me who the big spenders are. like the post above says - WHORES, both parties.
I kept preaching Ron Paul to the republican co-workers during the election. Their response: He won't protect Israel from Iran. Romney (douchebag) failed and Obama cont'd his reign.
"Are you people FUCKING STUPID?"
I think we know the painful answer to that question.
A lot of people like bitcoin.
A lot of
people like public banking.
A lot of people don't like
rehypothecation of credit.
A lot of people insist a
currency can't succeed
absent a central Treasury.
Some of those things seem
mutually exclusive.
Here's one example of public
banking, not that
I mean to knock the idea.
http://goo.gl/ScF08H
Ykes.
There may actually be a
parallel to health care.
Centric to patients/providers,
rather than carriers?
Chance/risk treated equitably
(plus a (high) minimum cross-
the-board percentage of
accountable care levels still
allowing for full freedoms
after the unavoidable economic
impact of that is pervasive,
plus, of course, universality thus
tier-free by that, using simple
prior year tax returns
and no implicit now you see it
now you don't Simpson Bowles
elements) treated rather than
driving eligibility for subsidy along
monopolistic and privatizing
profits/socializing cost lines.
Risk equalization requires a central
accounting adjustment mechanism.
If ObamaCare Were Somehow
Convertible Into Bet'able
Investment Tranches,
Obviously The Patients Driven
To Subsidy By Risk Are
Comparable To The Junk
Mortgage Tranches Used For
Shorting That Emerged From
The Mortgage Packages That
Began Life Rated Comparably
To Sovereign Debt Despite
Containing ARM's Acquired
During A Time Of Artificially
Low Interest Obligating
Unqualified Borrowers.
I Want Universality, And
No Exclusions, And
Cohesiveness, But Not That.
(Bitcoin DOES remove monopoly
of the treatment of currency
value risk--but only until someone
invents manipulating it or
destroying confidence in it,
though those influences may
be temporary. So it really does
have a risk equalization value
much like the mechanism that
could be used in health care,
where increasing risk is driving
eligibility for subsidy along
an ability to pay, monopolistic,
privatized mechanism.)
Banking should enjoy all the same
right objectives.
Reverse engineering rationally and
simply as to what's needed, it doesn't
seem to be a risk equalizer, but it
does seem to be an ombudsman and
overseer of banks' net equity at risk.
Governments, like any enterprise, will
run on equity, debt and revenue.
I can't imagine limiting commerce to
the gold (as currency) lying around
the world. Theoretically, absent
Isaac Newton's return to life and
his concomitant discovery of the alchemy
of gold, the supply of gold is limited;
though, stress field detectors may push
reaching that limit far back, admittedly.
When gold and peasants' tax-paying
is insufficient, a King might
think of borrowing from a private
bank.
http://pages.citebite.com/n1t1x3k2nouw
I personally think it may have been
more recently an industrial titan
could lend to his own competitors
in one industry, that being his own,
while also being a banker, and then
flood that industry with supply, and
then call the loans, thus making
those would be competitors
sharecroppers, effectively.
That resembles the duplicitous
nature of the recent mortgage bubble;
and, some of the same banks could
even be involved; and, one process
may simply be business as usual,
carrying on fromt he earlier one.
So I think there CAN be a role, even
an inescapable one, for fractional
reserve banking.
I think privatizing profits and
socializing costs, and monopoly,
such as of the currency, leads to
unrestrained Ponzi like behavior at
the expense of the revenue suppliers.
So, I'd think remaking the Federal
Reserve as an ombudsman and
overseer of banks' net equity at risk
(in earnest) is needed.
The existing Federal Reserve may not
care to be reformed.
So we may need an American Reserve Bank.
I don't know how any enterprise, including
the U.S., will conduct business other
than with revenue, borrowing and the
full faith and credit of its currency
representing an equity in value.
So those complaining about the current system
who make major points as to borrowing
are actually invested in policy issues more
than banking per se.
There's nothing wrong with borrowing per se
so long as it's not committed to privatizing
profits and socializing debt, and monopoly,
and profiting from adversity, and privatizing
further.
The printer of our money would then be
the American Reserve Bank.
But it would still borrow from banks.
And Treasury will still need revenue.
The US won't last 3 years before the world turns on it.
Out untapped reserve's on the table.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-21/us-gdp-will-be-revised-higher-500-billion-following-addition-intangibles-economy
Europe's not let letting anyone shove GMO's
down their throats.
The computers and cloud services are being turned back.
So let's break US won't last 3 years down into a manageable demonstrable
example.
Handicapped export ability.
Profit privatizers/cost socializers just produce dead weight
everywhere we look.
Our own oligarchs at least aren't alone with destroying
the Arctic.
(I think Canada?, China and Russia are doing that too.)
https://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/09/29-8
The mortgage bubble recovery flim-flam:
(1 and 2:)
http://pages.citebite.com/o2c0d2e1j0mlb
http://pages.citebite.com/d1i8e3n1t3rpv
3
The Carriage Of Delinquent
Assets By The Public, Which
Is Essentially The Financing
Of Dead Weight So The
Buyers Of Those Investments
Can Keep On Keeping On
In The Manner Of John Corzine.
4
The Fact That Millions Of
Homeowners Never Left The
Position Of Being Underwater
And Literally Can't Afford To
Market Their Homes Lest
They Pay In Large Sums To
Their Mortgagees, Even Upon
Closing Of The Sales Of Their
Homes.
Even Where That Does Not
Appear Being The Case Owing
ToThe Case Shiller Index,
Nominally, It Would, I Believe
Be Far More The Case Were
More Thrift Withheld
Properties Marketed.
So that flim-flam looks like it may remain a flim-flam because of the other economic folly. Are we supposed to have anything available to us besides buying our own demise with reverse ETF's? Hedging is useful. I apply anti-fragile in process informed manners only, thinking how silly for some to believe in social darwinism while rejecting biologic darwinism. But then it becomes really useful. For instance, dissent is obviously anti-fragile. You know, some of our nation's control freaks may really be emotionally distressed. Which means we can't actually influence them, let alone fix them. So someone's going to have to do the Gene McCarthy routine and say no you're not really a new wing of the DP. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhGwb7WQWb8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8H7a0JTpDdA --__-- http://goo.gl/l0lOHH --__-- http://goo.gl/GmV9Ay(on edit, may usefully position the above)
Give every person a $50,000 coin with Krugman's profile on it.
Next.
Senator Danforth in 1992:
"I have never seen more senators express discontent with their jobs. ... I think the major cause is that, deep down in our hearts, we have been accomplices to doing something terrible and unforgivable to this wonderful country. Deep down in our hearts, we know that we have bankrupted America and that we have given our children a legacy of bankruptcy. ... We have defrauded our country to get ourselves elected."
He must have been speaking too close to the truth, as he was gone shortly after. Truth will not be let stand by either party. They will bury people like Cruz for exposing their lies. Same as it has ever been.
Be prepared. When America goes down she will take her arch rivals with her. She is not going to allow anyone to remain a winner by default.
funny, according to my books I owe NOTHING to anybody.
"and while this is surging (and clearly unsustainable), compared to much of Europe, it remains low..."
Which would seem to indicate that it can go on longer, despite the politcal theatrics.
It always looks like you can kick the can farther down the road. Until you can't.
Makes you long for the good old days of Carter and Clinton :)