This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

How 'Over-valued' Are Stocks Relative To Jobs?

Tyler Durden's picture




 

While the noise and seasonality of the various measures of employment (or lack thereof) in the US make interpretation nigh on impossible (for all but the most linear extrapolators), many strategists recognize that their is a correlated (if not causative) relationship between the rate of unemployment and the S&P 500. However, as Bloomberg's Chase Van Der Rhoer notes, using the unemployment rate to predict the S&P 500 Index may be an oversimplification, but doing so yields surprisingly robust results and suggests the index is overvalued to the tune of 150 points.

 

 

Chart: Bloomberg Briefs

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 11/11/2013 - 09:52 | 4142412 Bearwagon
Bearwagon's picture

The modern "Trinity": Overvalued, overbought, overbullish. We are in for a surprise ...

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:00 | 4142430 Mike Hunt Hurts
Mike Hunt Hurts's picture

I bought a truckload of TWTR on Thursday's IPO.

I used maximum margin leverage, even put a second mortgage on my home to buy extra shares.

What could possibly go wrong?

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:57 | 4142566 I am more equal...
I am more equal than others's picture

 

 

Overvalued, overbought, overbullish

The Bernake Trifecta.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 11:17 | 4142611 czardas
czardas's picture

Not really.   It's only high if you cheat and don't adjust for for inflation - a fact blurted on CNBC to the consternation of the "hosts" blabbing about "new highs".  Compare 1998 - gas was $1.06, a movie ticket, $2.69, the S&P, 1175.  Gas has tripled, movie tickets quadrupled but the S&P is up 50%.  It's why folks fully invested can't seem to get ahead even after this huge run up - inflation has so elevated everything that our highs are deceiving.  If the S&P has gone up an average of gas & movie tickets it would be 3,600.  

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 09:52 | 4142413 101 years and c...
101 years and counting's picture

how much over valued is this if they used U6, or if people didnt continually drop out of labor force and U3 was 11-12%?

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 12:09 | 4142763 BigJim
BigJim's picture

Bingo! Lets use the labour participation rate to calculate this, shall we?

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 09:53 | 4142416 mvsjcl
mvsjcl's picture

150 points doesn't even come close to the overvalue figure.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:43 | 4142517 Bosch
Bosch's picture

If it is 150 overvalued using the 0bama Protected publicly announced employment figures, it must be 1,150 overvalued if you used something approaching the true numbers. 

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 09:57 | 4142423 new game
new game's picture

forgot to factor in day traders as unemployed but working...

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:02 | 4142426 Mercury
Mercury's picture

However, as Bloomberg's Chase Van Der Rhoer notes, using the unemployment rate to predict the S&P 500 Index may be an oversimplification, but doing so yields surprisingly robust results and suggests the index is overvalued to the tune of 150 points.

 

Well this recent Bloomberg presentation/post makes a convincing case that the metric we should be looking at is consumer spending power, not simply jobs or the unemployment rate per se. 

 

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:03 | 4142441 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

'Spending power' of most conned-sumers today is based on what kind of check they got from the guvt. this month.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:15 | 4142464 overmedicatedun...
overmedicatedundersexed's picture

UE checks are stimulative to the economy, ask any dem or rino repub, subsidy by all powerful .gov, keeps everyone afloat, corporations banks local .gov, so DC must become larger so they can distribute more security, adm more regs and laws, print more paper notes and FRN's, fight more wars, give aid and security to all the countries of the world ..we live in the age of government centric thinking, some of us still productive run counter to the paradime they have created, so we must be crushed, they are doing a good job of it so far..that is why they will take all your wealth, and that is why so many hide wealth off shore,or  in PM's, art, guns, what ever has the hope of avoiding the confiscation to come.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 09:59 | 4142429 ChaosEquilibrium
ChaosEquilibrium's picture

I think there is a misprint:  it should of read-1500 overvalued!

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:37 | 4142504 999.9
999.9's picture

Nope, just 500 points...

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:00 | 4142433 Shizzmoney
Shizzmoney's picture

Stocks vs unemployment rate slide via BCA Research:

In era of QE: jobs don't matter.  Stocks, fiat, and fake "profits" do.

This has to end at some point, but this has been going on in Japan for over 20 years. 

Wage+job deflation + asset inflation = stagnation 

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:24 | 4142479 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

The whole "flation" debate is pointless in a "market" that doesn't allow for true price discovery.  Print all the fiat you want, it still take calories (energy) in order to actually get anything done or manufacture something of real value.  Japan has been able to get away with this for 20+ years because things were relatively stable elsewhere, when the whole world "turns Japanese" all hell will break loose...

 

Tick tock motherfuckers.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 11:21 | 4142622 MachoMan
MachoMan's picture

Which is a testament to the interconnected nature of the world economy.  I guess we'll figure out how centralized or distributed our system is...  hopefully the latter for the sake of millions of folks, but I have my doubts.

Also, it ought to be a pretty solid smoking gun for the FED's (and other central banks') intervention(s) in the global markets...  as well as the solidity of their collusion.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:01 | 4142435 new game
new game's picture

all in all a dumb post.  it corelates to qe-end of story.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:09 | 4142448 GMadScientist
GMadScientist's picture

"Look Ma! I can fly!!"

<thud>

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:19 | 4142467 Bearwagon
Bearwagon's picture

"Jump, you fuckers!"

<thud>

*Sigh*    if only .....

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:07 | 4142436 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

So? I thought everyone by now realized stock indexes are for mass crowd control only....people are still trying to say they reflect reality in any way? 

I don't even know why they're so desperate to pump stocks anymore either, no one I know is even paying attention anymore they're just droning thru their days now like robots pretty much.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:08 | 4142445 GMadScientist
GMadScientist's picture

They reflect reality for the 10% of the population that gets to play along at home; it matters a great deal to CEOs and even CDO-(squared?)-shareholdin' sycophants and other hangers-on from the Hamptons.

 

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:10 | 4142450 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

I see, so fooling themselves is what really matters. Sounds legit!

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:11 | 4142455 TideFighter
TideFighter's picture

Now, debt relative to jobs, different story. After all, it is the only mandate, right?

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:16 | 4142465 muleskinner
muleskinner's picture

MMM 127.99 pe 19.67

Probably overvalued by 55 dollars per share with earnings at 6.51 and a dividend of 2.54 USD.

'Investors' are hoping for a stock split, however, MMM split about five years ago, so they are not going to see it, imo.

I don't know when it is all going to fall and a panic develops.

I do know that it will happen.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 10:39 | 4142502 yogibear
yogibear's picture

Jobs don't matter anymore. It's all QE driven. The Fed is stuck.  

It's why Yellen and her 12 member PhD stooges will have to supply ever more QE booze and drugs to the Wall Street stock party.

In this twilight zone market it can become even more overbought. Outragiously overbought. It's feels like  DOT COM again.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 11:28 | 4142643 Racer
Racer's picture

How can you compare two manipulated values?

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 11:31 | 4142655 Bearwagon
Bearwagon's picture

Easy: You just compare them to a randomly drawn line which you simply pull out of your ass or likewise

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 11:35 | 4142669 Peter Pan
Peter Pan's picture

Reading the preamble to this article was enough to dissuade me from reading the rest.

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 11:43 | 4142692 damicol
damicol's picture

The dumb fuck wits forgot to add in that it also  is dependant on all things being equall,

Like hours shorter, weeks shorter,  and the massive 30% real drop in incomes.. so knock another 40% off before that 150 deduction. That makes it oh about 900.

seems about right that to me

 

Mon, 11/11/2013 - 12:32 | 4142826 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

I think you meant overvalued by 1,500 points.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!