This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Guest Post: The Real Heroes Of The Global Economy
Authored by Dani Rodrik, originally posted at Project Syndicate,
Economic policymakers seeking successful models to emulate apparently have an abundance of choices nowadays. Led by China, scores of emerging and developing countries have registered record-high growth rates over recent decades, setting precedents for others to follow. While advanced economies have performed far worse on average, there are notable exceptions, such as Germany and Sweden. “Do as we do,” these countries’ leaders often say, “and you will prosper, too.”
Look more closely, however, and you will discover that these countries’ vaunted growth models cannot possibly be replicated everywhere, because they rely on large external surpluses to stimulate the tradable sector and the rest of the economy. Sweden’s current-account surplus has averaged above a whopping 7% of GDP over the last decade; Germany’s has averaged close to 6% during the same period.
China’s large external surplus – above 10% of GDP in 2007 – has narrowed significantly in recent years, with the trade imbalance falling to about 2.5% of GDP. As the surplus came down, so did the economy’s growth rate – indeed, almost point for point. To be sure, China’s annual growth remains comparatively high, at above 7%. But growth at this level reflects an unprecedented – and unsustainable – rise in domestic investment to nearly 50% of GDP. When investment returns to normal levels, economic growth will slow further.
Obviously, not all countries can run trade surpluses at the same time. In fact, the successful economies’ superlative growth performance has been enabled by other countries’ choice not to emulate them.
But one would never know that from listening, for example, to Germany’s finance minister, Wolfgang Schäuble, extolling his country’s virtues. “In the late 1990’s, [Germany] was the undisputed ‘sick man’ of Europe,” Schäuble wrote recently. What turned the country around, he claims, was labor-market liberalization and restrained public spending.
In fact, while Germany did undertake some reforms, so did others, and its labor market does not look substantially more flexible than what one finds in other European economies. A big difference, however, was the turnaround in Germany’s external balance, with annual deficits in the 1990’s swinging to a substantial surplus in recent years, thanks to its trade partners in the eurozone and, more recently, the rest of the world. As the Financial Times’ Martin Wolf, among others, has pointed out, the German economy has been free-riding on global demand.
Other countries have grown rapidly in recent decades without relying on external surpluses. But most have suffered from the opposite syndrome: excessive reliance on capital inflows, which, by spurring domestic credit and consumption, generate temporary growth. But recipient economies are vulnerable to financial-market sentiment and sudden capital flight – as happened recently when investors anticipated monetary-policy tightening in the United States.
Consider India, until recently another much-celebrated success story. India’s growth during the past decade had much to do with loose macroeconomic policies and a deteriorating current account – which recorded a deficit of more than 5% of GDP in 2012, having been in surplus in the early 2000’s. Turkey, another country whose star has faded, also relied on large annual current-account deficits, reaching 10% of GDP in 2011.
Elsewhere, small, formerly socialist economies – Armenia, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, Lithuania, and Kosovo – have grown very rapidly since the early 2000’s. But look at their average current-account deficits from 2000 to 2013 – which range from a low of 5.5% of GDP in Lithuania to a high of 13.4% in Kosovo – and it becomes evident that these are not countries to emulate.
The story is similar in Africa. The continent’s fastest-growing economies are those that have been willing and able to allow yawning external gaps from 2000 to 2013: 26% of GDP, on average, in Liberia, 17% in Mozambique, 14% in Chad, 11% in Sierra Leone, and 7% in Ghana. Rwanda’s current account has deteriorated steadily, with the deficit now exceeding 10% of GDP.
The world’s current-account balances must ultimately sum up to zero. In an optimal world, the surpluses of countries pursuing export-led growth would be willingly matched by the deficits of those pursuing debt-led growth. In the real world, there is no mechanism to ensure such an equilibrium on a continuous basis; national economic policies can be (and often are) mutually incompatible.
When some countries want to run smaller deficits without a corresponding desire by others to reduce surpluses, the result is the exportation of unemployment and a bias toward deflation (as is the case now). When some want to reduce their surpluses without a corresponding desire by others to reduce deficits, the result is a “sudden stop” in capital flows and financial crisis. As external imbalances grow larger, each phase of this cycle becomes more painful.
The real heroes of the world economy – the role models that others should emulate – are countries that have done relatively well while running only small external imbalances. Countries like Austria, Canada, the Philippines, Lesotho, and Uruguay cannot match the world’s growth champions, because they do not over-borrow or sustain a mercantilist economic model. Theirs are unremarkable economies that do not garner many headlines. But without them, the global economy would be even less manageable than it already is.
- 10772 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


Official: financial crises favor banking cartels
http://failedevolution.blogspot.gr/2013/11/official-financial-crises-fav...
Ignore money, money is a means to maintain power and control over resources, nothing more. Humanity is a ponzi and the earth's carrying capacity is what it is.
Hedge accordingly.
Who benefits from the concept of perpetual growth?
The human trash like the banksters and other scammers, because they can sell all kind of bullshit like austerity measures (they taper everything else than their benefits), government spending etc to the sheeple.
Money should be just a tool not the goal.
What's wrong with deflation? The derps that control the fractional banking system know their plan dies when their fiats can't be divided anymore...
With world demographics the way they are, I don't think a deflationary thud would end well. Need that "ex nihilo" wealth effect with inflation to keep the torches and pitch forks at bay.
@ dracos_ghost It's like the sun. We all know it's going to burn out someday, and hope we aren't around when it does...
A bit off topic....
The general concensus is that the sun has a loooong way to go before it burns out. If we haven't mastered our way around the stars and galaxies by that time then perhaps we should vanish.
The real heroes of the global economy are the citizens of the world who somehow get up and go to work to pay their taxes and feed their families despite the incompetence, greed and corruptness of their politicians and bankers.
Up arrowed you but I think it'd be better to replace "Heroes" with "Dupes"; the only way this doesn't end in fire is if the dupes just refuse to work and be bled any longer.
"The world’s current-account balances must ultimately sum up to zero"
It Should but it doesn't. There is about a trillion dollars of phantom trade in the world. Mostly tax dodges by multinational companies.
The Chinese must be doing sumting right. I accompanied a friend to Houston to look for a house b/c of job change. We visited several model homes, etc and I was fascinated at how many Chinese are buying $600k--to-$1.2 million houses with cashola. Many young couples were accompanies by one of their parents.
It's a completely different ball game out there these days with many foreigners literally loaded with money + our present Open Door Immigration Policy...the whole plent is evolving.
It's gonna be lots more competitive for the Yutes of America. They better forego the next episode of Duck Dynasty and Balloon Boy reruns and hit those books.......HARD.
....Chinese are buying $600k--to-$1.2 million houses....
This is how we wash the money, grasshoppa.....ancient Chinese secret.
Better call Saul!
How the fuck could socialist countries pull off that shit?
They don't know shit, don't you know?
A fucking puff apologist piece if I ever saw one...
My fuck, "in an optimal world", what the fuck does that mean? If the distribution of capital, resources and labor are not even then how do you get your "optimal" world...
The thing about Germany and Sweden is that we all they basically have is their people: You better figure out real fast on how to make it work...
You have to, or you perish...
Idiot. Go and fuck yourself. German TPTB vassals played the book, kill their economy and the social systems, devastated the infrastructure, killd the high educatin ( watch the ratings ), stole the depositts in the 90ties, ( Neue Markt ), still paying the american occupators out of the budget. ( OK it's just a police force to kill anyone with the guts - no worry, there ain't no guts in the buttfucking and cockliking country like GERMANIA ). The land withot the constitution pushes vor ECB-Kaliphat and craves for ANY KIND OF COLLATERAL ...
Romanian Soylent Grren doesn't taste at all ...
Kosovo is not a country it is a dislocated disaster area whose principal industries are sex slavery, drugs and stolen merchandise.