Israel Working With Saudi Arabia On Iran "Contingency" Attack

Tyler Durden's picture

When last week's Iran nuclear talks were blocked by France, it provided a useful glimpse into just who it was that would benefit politically from a continuation of the regional confrontation. But while the French sabotage was an amusing distraction, it revealed a curious shift in middle-east alliances, namely old "enemies" Israel and Saudi Arabia, both feeling shunned by Big Brother, suddenly becoming the best of buddies. It was only a matter of time before this novel alliance moved beyond just paper and tested how far it could go in real life. Said test may come far sooner than expected: according to the Sunday Times, Israel's Mossad and Saudi Arabia are planning an attack against Iran if negotiations and talks don't come to an agreement, and that Saudia Arabia will permit Israel to use their air space for an attack on Iran including full technical support.

According to the Sunday Times, the Saudis would assist an Israeli attack by cooperating with the use of drones, rescue helicopters, and tanker planes. "Once the Geneva agreement is signed, the military option will be back on the table. The Saudis are furious and are willing to give Israel all the help it needs,” said the paper citing an unnamed official.

The flipside is that by pursuing an outright attack of Iran, the new Israel-Saudi axis would implicitly go against the wishes of not only Russia but, if John Kerry's detente posture is to be believed, that of the US itself.

Israel's PM Natanyahu naturally knows this, so instead he is merely lobbying for even more political support starting in the one country, France, which has aligned itself with the new Middle East axis, even as Israel's old allies appear to have foresaken it. Jerusalem Post reports:

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said in an interview with French daily Le Figaro on Saturday that there is a “meeting of the minds” between Israel and the “leading states in the Arab world” on the Iran issue – “one of the few cases in memory, if not the first case in modern times."


“We all think that Iran should not be allowed to have the capacities to make nuclear weapons,” he said. “We all think that a tougher stance should be taken by the international community. We all believe that if Iran were to have nuclear weapons, this could lead to a nuclear arms race in the Middle East, making the Middle East a nuclear tinderbox.”


Saying that an Iran with nuclear arms would be the most dangerous development for the world since the mid-20th century, and stressing that the “stakes are amazing,” Netanyahu urged the world’s leaders to pay attention “when Israel and the Arabs see eye-to-eye.”


“We live here,” he said. “We know something about this region. We know a great deal about Iran and its plans. It’s worthwhile to pay attention to what we say.”


Netanyahu made the comments as French President Francois Hollande was set to arrive in Israel for talks on Iran on Sunday.

In the meantime, Iran which suddenly finds itself the creme of the international diplomatic circle and is in full compliance with what the US demands, is explaining - via RT - just why a joint attack on its by supposedly former enemies will not happen:

 Iranian political analyst Seyed Mohammad Marandi told RT that an imminent joint attack on Iran was unlikely given the serious ramifications it could provoke for the region.


“It is highly unlikely that the Saudis and Israelis would want to attack Iran because at the end of the day both countries would be losers, they would be seen as aggressors and obviously the Iranians would retaliate,” Marandi told RT.


Although he consented that the Saudis and Israelis have been moving closer together lately, neither of them stood to gain from attacking Iran.


“It would create an economic catastrophe for the world and only the Saudis and the Israelis would be to blame,” said Marandi.

Then again, considering a GDP-boosting economic catastrophe (recall the main reason the US wanted war with Syria is to boost the defense spending budget which lately has been in freefall) is precisely what the Fed and the Congressional muppetmasters want, we wouldn't sleep too soundly if we were in the Ayatollah's shoes. Especially now that thanks to Reuters the entire world, and certainly the NSA, know just where all his rainy day funds are located. Because while it is true that neither Israel nor Saudi would gain from attacking Iran, the US most certainly would. And now it has not one but two proxy countries in the region doing its bidding.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
The Gooch's picture

"...the new Israel-Saudi axis"

That's rich.

GetZeeGold's picture



Let's go kill those guys, and we'll worry about killing each other later.


Hey it worked during WW2......just sayin.

CH1's picture

ALL governments are amoral brute beasts.

Religious affiliation is merely a tool to get the suckers (err, populace) to comply.

AlaricBalth's picture

Israel and Saudi Arabia bilaterally planning to attack another middle eastern country is an outrage!

Bombing those people is the US's franchise and is clearly a violation of Section 4 of the Clayton Anti-Trust Act. The MIC should immediately file suit in a federal district court due to "injury in their business or property".

Our Lawyer in Chief should immediately litigate on behalf of the MIC. That ought to scare the Saudi-Israeli War Corporation.

Running On Bingo Fuel's picture

Hey where did israel get all that nice war equipment?

Oh, they bought it for $1 from the USSA after their middle east conflicts, Iraq, Afghanistan. What's that you say, it was approved by congress critters and internal .gov employees who hold dual US/israel citizenship and brokered by israeli friends in aipac. It was 'just too expensive to ship that stuff home'.

I don't know about any of that. Sounds like a big fat lie.


johnQpublic's picture

it seems as though nobody in the war machine will be happy until nobody is left


long sticks and stones

Max Hunter's picture

Saudi Royal family and nuttyahoo agree. Stop the presses. The sad part is the number of people that he will reach in the US with that stupid ass statement.

LetThemEatRand's picture

The Saudi Royal family has been going along with this kind of stuff for decades.  Up until now, they hid it from their population since most of the population would be none to happy about it.  But I guess if no one else will start a war to protect their royal hindends from allowing Iran to defend itself with nuclear weapons, they'll have to finally come out from behind the shadows and do the dirty work themselves.

Keyser's picture

Hmm, the Arabs and the Jews do make strange bedfellows. I wonder which one is the pitcher and which is the catcher? 


aint no fortunate son's picture

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend" just became "The friend of my friend is my enemy."

Herd Redirection Committee's picture

Rumors out of the Middle East have for decades speculated that the House of Saud has Jewish origins.  All the worst (and extreme) forms of Islam originate where?  All terrorism funding originates where?

john39's picture

yes, wake up and smell the crypto zionists people.  Infiltration is their specialty, in case you didn't notice...  they can pose as any religion, any nationality... they are amoral and bent on one end power.     Now that the house of Saud is out in the open aligning with israel, the end is near for them.

john39's picture

meanwhile, freak floods hit saudi arabia...  someone getting a message?:

the lightening strike pic says it all.

knukles's picture

Lemme see here...
Between KSA with the oil and Israel with the military clout, seems that the Obie administration's gonna wind up with the Somalian pirates for their closest ally in the ME

Nice Job Obie

The Cloward Piven, NWO Plan Working Perfectly!
The Cloward Piven, NWO Plan Working Perfectly!
The Cloward Piven, NWO Plan Working Perfectly!

Another Conspiracy Theory Bites the Dust

If you like your Middle East peace you can keep your Middle East peace
I did it all by myself.

what am I missing here?

Oh yeah...

It didn't happen unilaterally, so he'll veto it.

wee-weed up's picture



But The Obungler would love to have a nice big diversion...

To take the heat off him and his collossal failure of a health care plan...

And get something else on the front pages of the press.

Cruel Aid's picture

While being completely above and removed from it... LR head shake.

TBT or not TBT's picture

I think you're thinking of the fictional Sith and their whole darkside thing, which stories were written for adolescent boys, soooo maybe you like adolescent boys?

john39's picture

the most popular stories and movies usually have one thing in common... they capture some underlying truth in a way that the masses can relate to:

"Our race is the Master Race. We Jews are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves."
- Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a speech to the Knesset quoted in "Begin and the Beasts," New Statesman, June 25, 1982 by Amnon Kapeliouk

Suisse's picture

Menachem Begin never said that, it is a made up quote.

john39's picture

maybe, maybe not... unless you were there and recorded it, how would you prove it either way?  In any event, it would seem foolish to deny that zionism is simply a form or racial/ethinic supremism.  Michael Hoffman has covered this topic extensively:

Clashfan's picture

Fake quotes don't help prove the important and, in this thread, nearly forgotten point that the House of Saud may well be Jewish (or Khazar, whatever). This is more than rumor. Our forces liberated information from the Iraqi intel files which support it; other historical references support it, too.

For the record, I'm not claiming to know. It is beyond rumor, though, and it would explain a lot.

Some of the historical allegations can be found here:

And the info on the Americans finding this in Sadaam's gov's files can be found here:

These are just sources I'm tossing up quickly, btw. A better, more patient search will likely produce more credible and more contemplative sources.

One other point, though, is about the whole Medina thing. It's not only a funky, cold song, but it's also an interesting word/place/name for Shriners' certificates if you know what I mean. Just sayin'.

bilejones's picture

And just how do you propose to prove your claim?

kchrisc's picture

Any race too!

The NAACP was founded by Jews, only one original board member was black, W.E.B. Web, and for the first 66 years all of its presidents were white 'tribe' members. Look it up.

Not just "infiltrators" but "dividers" as well.

I have always wondered where the antisemitism that the Nazis took advantage of came from, not just in Germany, but all of Europe. Every year I understand more.

TahoeBilly2012's picture

You call them "tribe"... I call them "East German Bankers". Funny how you get down votes when commentors expose the Zionist cabal, but the downvoters never actually deny or comment against, they just say "racist"! Please dear deniers of thye Zionist conpiracy, enlighten us as to how what we; see, hear or read, is all a figment of our go along with your down votes.

Clashfan's picture

It's because not all Jews are in on it, and the Jewish zionists could not do it by themselves. They need more/equally powerful groups to go along w/it, for sure. They need the WASPish, white, NE mafia; they need the royal bloodlines; they need WASPish Freemasonry (especially in the South), etc.

Implying that a small group of Jews rules the world all by itself is stupid. Understanding luciferianism, why it supports zionism, and why it reveres certain bloodlines, then, is a whole different kind of explanation.

The term, "luciferian zionism," then, is more appropriate, specific.

snodgrass's picture

The House of Saud is Jewish.  Second, the Saudis don't want anyone horning in on their business of selling oil. Iran is a competitor.

TahoeBilly2012's picture

Christ are the Bush's Jews too? Maybe everyone is but THAT is a conspiracy!

Clashfan's picture

No, the Bushes, like the rest of the NE elite, are closet satanists, rather luciferian zionists. Skull and Bones? Bohemian Grove?

Russell Trust? Lots to learn here.

Flagit's picture

i have a patent that turns Turbins, into lightning rods.

RSloane's picture

Given the horribly crippling sanctions the US has levied against Iran there is no need for killing them directly.

GetZeeGold's picture



Obama Secretly Loosened Sanctions on Iran


"A review of Treasury Department notices reveals that the U.S. government has all but stopped the financial blacklisting of entities and people that help Iran evade international sanctions since the election of its president, Hassan Rouhani, in June."


RSloane's picture

Their currency entered a state of hyperinflation long ago. Their overall personal and state purchasing power is and has been in the tank. Wake me when the US releases all of the Iranian money/investments they confiscated.

GetZeeGold's picture



Yeah....but it was reported that they're within months of a device. Yes, like we're been hearing last 4 years now.


At some point.....time is just up.....cause you sure as hell don't want to strike after they have a nuke.


Understand I'm not picking sides here....I'm just sayin.

Herodotus's picture

We didn't launch a preemptive attack on North Korea.  They now have the bomb.  What's the difference?

WOAR's picture


Well, North Korea is a proxy for China. That's the difference. We can't attack them without provoking a response from China.

wee-weed up's picture



Herodotus  We didn't launch a preemptive attack on North Korea.  They now have the bomb.


You can thank the extremely naive Clintoon Admin and...

Madeline Half-Bright for the Norks getting the bomb.

TheFourthStooge-ing's picture


You can thank the extremely naive Clintoon Admin and...

Madeline Half-Bright for the Norks getting the bomb.

Donny Rumsfeld's hands are dirty as well.

RSloane's picture

I remember reading about their nuclear capability being operational any minute now for years. Iran is a relatively rich oil and gas country that is too poor to build all of the refining capabilities it needs to become fuel independent. It sought remedy in nuclear power. I do not believe that any state, nor any group of states, has the right to dictate to a nation what type of engery it can and cannot pursue. That should be wholly the decision of the state and its citizens.

cossack55's picture

Just have Japan site their nuke plants and have GE build their reactors and the Iranians will all die from radiation poisoning within 2 years.

FeralSerf's picture

The world, especially the west coast of North America, would have been much better off if Japan hadn't been allowed to have nuclear fueled energy production.

That said, Israel is upwind from Iran.

kchrisc's picture

Iran is doomed.

They want to sell oil outside the Petrodollar, are of the competing Shia and not Sunni branch of Islam, have proxies in Southern Lebanon that are blocking Israel's desire to take the waters of the Litani basin for themselves, are allied with the Syrians which are blocking the Saudis' pipeline to Europe and control the water on the Golan that the Israelis want, etc.

The Israelis and the Saudis have only one problem to solve before attacking, and that is how to "Pearl Harbor" or "Lusitania" the US into doing the dirty work for them. If you live in an major city in the US, move.

Jack Burton's picture

kchrisc, +100, You have nailed it. Such is the case! We American people will pay the price. Both in the false flag terror attack and in the war our kids will be made to fight for Israel's greater power and glory. After all, god set them up as his chosen, America is obligated to fight on god's side.

snodgrass's picture

Iran has some new friends - the Chinese and Russians. The attack on Libya and proposed on Iran is about derailing Gasprom. I don't think the Russians will let that happen.

TahoeBilly2012's picture

Or Israhell is doomed. I don't have Iranian's running my Congress, financial system and extremely pathetic entertainment complex which is making me want to flee my own Country. Not sure I want Iranian's running those parts of my world about some Norwegian's?

Flagit's picture

I do not believe that any state, nor any group of states, has the right to dictate to a nation what type of engery it can and cannot pursue. That should be wholly the decision of the state and its citizens.


whos the new guy?

and welcome to planet Earth.

TheFourthStooge-ing's picture


Yeah....but it was reported that they're within months of a device. Yes, like we're been hearing last 4 years now.

We've been hearing it for nearly thirty years, since at least 1984.

At some point.....time is just up.....cause you sure as hell don't want to strike after they have a nuke.

Yes, and you don't want to strike when both US and Israeli intelligence agree that there is no Iranian nuclear weapon program, because that would be terrorism and murder.

So I agree, time is just up, and nobody likes a bully. The US government needs to grow up, take the threat of military action off the table, and engage in good faith negotiations to resolve this manufactured crisis.

Clashfan's picture

+1, sorry, my shitizenism saw post of yours after post of mine responding to above Americanism. How you note, though, second mine post dates sordid nuclear warnings Iran to 1979, year of much auspicism. How you?

TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

Nuclear paranoiac Netanyahuism has been blobbing up since 1992.

Given Netanyahu's pattern of threats, warmongering, "annexation" of territory, and his sordid past,

you really have to wonder if his claims of <nemesis du jour> being the new Hitler aren't just the psychological projections of a sociopath.