House Hearing On Obama's Unilateral Action To Cease Enforcing Laws - Live Webcast

Tyler Durden's picture

The House Judiciary Committee is about to discuss what it calls “The President’s Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the Laws,” focusing on the Obamacare delays, enforcement of immigration laws, and more. As Mediaite notes, the question of whether the president can take unilateral action to cease enforcing laws stretches back at least to last summer, when President Barack Obama said he would stop deporting young undocumented immigrants, an end-run around congressional refusal to pass the DREAM Act.

Executive orders have played a part in everything from the non-enforcement of the Defense of Marriage Act to the administration’s “fix” two weeks ago allowing insurance providers to renew policies cancelled after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. 

It seems the constitutional lawyers want to have their say in the "most transparent" administration ever.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Seasmoke's picture

The King of Spades

NotApplicable's picture

Oooh, this circus oughta make the facade nice and shiny!

smlbizman's picture

way to many canadians on the govt. ms. jackson ,if ur nasty..or the intellectual mr. mel watts, etc....

kralizec's picture

Yeah, well...this will go no where...I mean like, where's the enfocement let alone the will to use it?!

Embrace violent resolution of America's ills...all peaceful avenues are being cut off, made illegal...or outright ignored.

aminorex's picture

Lindsey Graham is a corrupt war-profiteering fascist wannabe

wtf1369's picture

I agree, but who dragged that nancy boy into this?

666's picture

Obummer makes Nixon look like a saint!

midtowng's picture

If Obama was interested in enforcing laws he would have arrested Bush and Cheney for war crimes. And rounded up most of the Wall Street executives for financial crimes.

Why the House only cares about Obamacare regulations means the hearing is a joke.

N2OJoe's picture

You can't just end the list there...

Holder, Pelosi, Bernanke, Reid, Janet Napolitano, Every shareholder of the federal reserve, etc etc.

indygo55's picture

Exactly, that's why this is all theatre. Distraction. 

Trucker Glock's picture

Arrest Bush and Cheney?  Hell, Maobama granted Cheney Secret Service protection for life.  First time in history for a VP, if I recall correctly.

Rafferty's picture

Don't blame him. He's just an autocue-reading stuffed shirt dummy with the banksters' hand up his ass.  (Gues that reminds him of his bathhouse days.....)

doctor10's picture

Somebody's shorts are knotted since Syria never happened. They're gonna stick it to him gud!!! /s

doctor10's picture

Either that or the locals back in their districts are starting to squeal pretty hard and they have to look like they're doing SOMETHING congressional

Van Halen's picture

This shit Obama is pulling has to be stopped NOW. Because there is no question he'll take the mile if given the inch.

ParkAveFlasher's picture

Yeah, it'll all stop in the House of Representatives ... just after Boehner stops crying on Pelosi's cheese bags. 

NoDebt's picture

He already took the mile.  Now he's daring anyone to try to take it back.  Nobody steps up, he takes 10 more.

See recent article talking about eliminating the 2 term limit for a President (a Constitutional Ammendment, last time I checked).  The idea's already been floated, now they're just seeing how much push-back they get.

WallowaMountainMan's picture

tryin' to follow in putin's footsteps?



Just askin...



Dull Care's picture

Difference being that Putin actually has his country's best interests at heart.

Chewybunny's picture

Putin has his loyal followers and fellow oligarchs' interests first. There's a reason why Moscow has the highest number of billionaires per capita, but the rest of the country is a 3rd world desolate hell hole.


WallowaMountainMan's picture



reminds me of the impeach bush or die memes of yester-year.



WallowaMountainMan's picture

the down arrows remind me of the time i said egypt's reset of their democratic process would be less violent than ours was. (what reset of ours, you ask? oh, let's see....ummm....yeah.... the 'civil' war.)



williambanzai7's picture

Throw in The RICO Act while you are at it.

Blues Traveler's picture

and springle in extortion with a dabs of lies and a hints of illegal use of taxpayer funds....

Fromer fbi director Louis Freeh (clinton) spoke at an event, at the conclusion, he was aksed if he believed there was still 3 fucntioning branches of government and if he did, could he provide examples.  Louigi said yes but didn't provide any examples.

Why can we not sue the meida for lying?

Van Halen's picture

There's no reason to throw all these different things at Obama, other than the CONSTITUTION, which, if a simpleton like me is reading it right, says he can't use press conferences to announce he's going to change laws on a whim. Rather, laws are changed by CONGRESS.

Dr. Engali's picture

WTF is this? You mean to tell me that somebody in Washington finally noticed that this fucker keeps crossing the line and trampling the constitution in the process? No fucking way.

Bosch's picture

Someone besides Rand Paul or Ted Cruz anyway. 

the not so mighty maximiza's picture

Ted Cruz likes Goldman Sacks pussy, its confimred.

Real Estate Geek's picture

But in all fairness to him, I'm sure that GS can procure world-class pussy.


NoDebt's picture

If they were serious about this do you think it would be done in a show-hearing?  Where's the federal-level lawsuit making it's way to the Superme Court?

Both sides want this to continue.  They want to know that when their turn comes to wield that power it was well worth all the dead bodies they had to crawl over to get it.

SmallerGovNow2's picture

EXACTLY Doc!  There are multiple reasons why this guy should be impeached including Fast and Furrious, Libya, Bengazi, IRS Scandal, NSA Scandal, EO changing laws at will that he does not have the authority to do.

ParkAveFlasher's picture

Jon Corzine is being kept in a stealthy, subaquatic prison somewhere in the Bermuda Triangle.  Heard it from my guy.

RacerX's picture

That's okay, he'll only stick in the tip.

Overfed's picture

The trouble is partisan politics. No matter what O'bomb-a does wrong, the Dem controlled Senate will shoot down any sanctions against him. All in the name of party politics. Shameful.

Bosch's picture

Meanwhile, in the Mideast, via drone, Obama is actually Faithfully Executing the (In)Laws. 



stock trout's picture

" the question of whether the president can take unilateral action to cease enforcing laws stretches back at least to last summer"

Actually it stretches a little further back to the 1830s. "John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it" - Andrew Jackson.

divide_by_zero's picture

That brings up the other big question of an activist Supreme Court changing laws by decision not merely throwing them out over constitutionality. One could rightly argue that John Marshall as Chief Justice trampled over states rights and ushered in the supremacy of federal law and the era big government through "judicial review" a term he may have coined.

WallowaMountainMan's picture

santelli's on this....

w/ biderman no less....

live on air....propably over by the time you read this...



nmewn's picture

When the law only means what a tyrant wants it to mean (on any given day) it ceases to be the law...only the dictates and mandates of a tyrant.

NoDebt's picture

You're not implying that's where we are right now, are you?

Oh, you are.  OK, I can buy that.


Get this... this morning Obama announces he's going to give money to insurance companies so they can cover costs to comply with his decision to allow cancelled policies to be reinstated.  You're following this insanity so far, right?  

So where's he get that money?  Don't know, don't care.  Just pulled it out of his stash (taxpayer pockets), I guess.  Nobody even questioning if he has the authority.  Just "announce and it becomes law."

Being Free's picture

Yes.  This is an almost daily event. 

Guess he must be relying on the "Good and Plenty" clause in the constitution for this authority. /sarc

Everybodys All American's picture

This is to be expected when the formative years of the president is spent in foreign lands. Say what you will but how this president is acting is not an America concept under our rule of law..

Blues Traveler's picture

Barrack once said "just because I said I was going to do that doesnt mean I was going to do that..."

Quinvarius's picture

Worst...President...Ever.  He has no concept of the role of the President or that the law, specifically the Constitution, is bigger than he is.

Hedgetard55's picture

But...but... wasn't Captain Clusterfuck a Professor of Constitutional Law???