Refuting The Biggest "Recovery" Lies In Four Simple Charts

Tyler Durden's picture

"US profits are growing, companies have underinvested and have no choice but to spend more on CapEx, and corporations have much less debt than they did during the crisis thanks to a massive cash build up."

These are the generic go to explanations by soundbity talking heads for why the US recovery is gaining traction with US corporations, if not so much Joe Sixpack, and why companies are still cheap. There is one problem: they are all wrong.

As SocGen's Andrew Lapthorne shows conclusively, "US profits are not growing, companies are over not underinvesting (they may in fact have overinvested), and corporates are carrying more (not less) net debt than they were in 2009. It would appear that many believe the opposite to be true, yet corporate report and accounts data seems to say otherwise." But hey- stocks are at record highs, right, and the market is never wrong (except when it is), so who cares. Indeed "Thank goodness equities went up in 2013, otherwise it might have been a rather depressing year."

Here is what else SocGen uncovered:

  • When it comes to having a market view there are typically (at least) two sides to every argument. When it comes down to the state of US quoted sector profits and balance sheets there should be little argument, but even here there is a great debate, and several viewpoints with which we do not entirely agree.
  • First is the notion that profits growth accelerated in the US last year. Yes, the pro-forma figures from popular providers such as I/B/E/S show EPS growth of around 6-7%, but pro-forma figures are whatever you wish them to be. Reported earnings growth slowed to almost zero in 2013 and EBIT is largely where it stood at the beginning of 2012.
  • Capital expenditure growth, the great hope for 2014, slowed throughout 2013 as did cash flow growth and sales growth. However, capex as a proportion of sales is at elevated (not depressed) levels. Why would a company step up investment when faced with contracting margins and lacklustre demand? Surely sales and profit growth recoveries lead investment and not the other way around?
  • US corporates do indeed hold lots of cash, which is currently at record levels, but they also hold record levels of debt. Net debt (so discounting those massive cash piles) is 15% above the levels seen in 2008/09. The idea that corporates are paying down debt is simply not seen in the numbers. What is true is that deleveraging has occurred through the usual mechanism of higher asset prices (no doubt an aim of central bank policy). This is the painless form of deleveraging. It is also the most temporary, for a simple pull-back in equities and rise in volatility will put the problem back on centre stage

US profits growth stalled in 2013

When looking at profit growth most people tend to quote pro-forma earnings numbers from the likes of Bloomberg and I/B/E/S which show 12 month forward or trailing EPS to have grown by around 7% over the past year, consistent with the figures you see in our Global Market Arithmetic product, which are based on I/B/E/S supplied data.

However, a better profit series comes from MSCI, which has earnings data going back to 1970 for most major indices. This definition of earnings is not as harsh as the S&P earnings definition incorporated into the likes of Robert Shiller’s CAPE, but neither is it as overly generous as the pro-forma numbers supplied by I/B/E/S. To give you an example of the difference, during the 2009 profit slump S&P core earnings fell peak-to-trough by 92%, MSCI defined earnings fell by 55% and I/B/E/S pro-forma earnings fell by 36%.

As we show above, not only are MSCI reported profits barely growing but the gap in the growth rate between these numbers and the pro-forma numbers is widening, with the proforma number considerably more optimistic. This is a phenomenon that often precedes a more significant profit slump. It is also an indication that the quality of earnings is deteriorating. Based on MSCI reported figures, earnings are no longer growing.

Of course even these MSCI figures have been flattered by a reduction in the share count plus lower interest rates and tax charges. If we look at overall growth in earnings before interest and tax, or indeed gross cash flow, we find that neither has really moved for the last couple of years. It would appear then, that at an aggregate level, most profit growth is the result of astute financial engineering rather than improving cash flow – yet another sign of a tired, long in the tooth, profit cycle.

Corporates are overspending relative to sales

Another, perhaps surprising conclusion also to be seen from US report and accounts data is that US corporates are not underspending when it comes to capital expenditure and, in fact, relative to sales they may be overspending! The following chart shows overall capex to sales ratios for the US ex-financials. Rather than being depressed, what we see is that capex levels versus sales are relatively elevated. If anything it would appear from this data that capex levels are too high – not too low – as many are saying.

Indeed, if we look at the evolution of capital expenditure and cash flow growth, we see that we have already been through a long period of substantial capex growth and capex growth has exceeded cash flow growth for some time. Importantly, just as cash flow growth is slowing so too is capex growth and, in the absence of a pick-up in demand, it may continue to do so in an effort to preserve those precious high margins and profitability.

So why are corporates complaining about the lack of investment opportunities and opting largely to engage in share buybacks instead? As has been the case in Japan, we’d argue that the problem is not a lack of desire to invest, but anemic demand reflected in very low sales growth. After all, corporates did step up capital expenditure post the financial crisis only to then be confronted with a lackluster economic recovery. If the demand isn’t there why invest? And, of course, with credit abundant there are easier ways to boost asset prices, so why not pursue those instead?

US companies are carrying far more net debt than in 2007

Another curiosity is this notion that US companies have substantially reduced their debt pile and are therefore cash rich. The latter is indeed true. Cash and equivalents are at historically high levels, but rarely do those who mention the mountains of corporate cash also discuss the massive increase in debt seen over the last couple of years. In fact, debt levels have been growing to such an extent that net debt (i.e. excluding the massive cash pile) is 15% higher than it was prior to the financial crisis.

In summary: 2013 was a year of weakening cash flow growth, lower profit growth, deteriorating earnings quality, and corporates pilling on the debt – again! Well at least equities were up strongly last year, otherwise you might be feeling rather bearish.

So several counterfactual points: US corporates saw profit growth slow to almost zero last year and on an EBIT basis it has been flat for some time now. Earnings quality, rather than improving is actually deteriorating, as indicated by the increasing gap between official and pro-forma EPS numbers. As a consequence, following a long period of overspending and in the absence of a strong pick-up in demand, corporates will have to spend less and not more. Finally, as a consequence of such anemic growth, corporates have been gearing up their balance sheets in an effort to sustain EPS momentum via the continuing use of share buybacks. With markets up substantially in 2013 executing those share buybacks has become increasingly expensive. Little wonder companies have to borrow so much to continue executing them. So as the Q4 numbers roll in we’ll be looking for evidence of increasing earnings manipulation, greater leverage and for signs that the capex cycle might be improving.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Hindenburg...Oh Man's picture

3:30pm stick save attempt by Yellen. 

Ness.'s picture

It's now the 3:58:30 stick save.  Impressive Mr. Henry - enjoy your weekend you cocksucker.  

Shocker's picture

Still waiting for the Reocvery

Layoff List:


CarrierWave's picture

But, but... none of that matters for those who want to profit from the rising markets.

Most people do not care about the above analysis and thee are the ones who buy and push the markets higher.

That's where you want to be. Not follow the 'truth' that only few accept.

Stay on the sidelines and miss the rising markets.

2014 will see the markets heading higher still courtesy of Central Banks support and also because it's an election year.

Does anyone really think that the Gov will allow the markets to drop more than 3-5% in an Election year?

Also, as long as Interest rates stay as low as they are, stocks will keep going higher.

The FED got the hang of how to keep the markets going higher and they are the ones at the Helm. Not the distinguished writers of the Articles posted on ZH.

CrashisOptimistic's picture


Share buybacks have reversed.

Kayman's picture


Its a good thing governments and Central Banks never go broke...

Grande Tetons's picture

Three certainities in this life.

1. Death

2. Taxes

3. Precious metals slam Monday morning.

walküre's picture

GT, your avatar is either deflated or tapered or both. Surely you can do better to do your name justice.

Grande Tetons's picture

The rack is non negotiable Mr. Paper bag over his head. 

knukles's picture

My condolences
They should know it's not polite to make fun of mastectomy survivors. 

Buncha male chauvinist pigs

OpenThePodBayDoorHAL's picture

agree, very disappointing avatar pic

Grande Tetons's picture

She is the Rodney Dangerfields of racks, I tell yah. 

RaceToTheBottom's picture

Real Tetons are always better than Fake Tetons

Yen Cross's picture

    @ Grande Tetons I bought some 'aud' on the close.

  Here's why.

18:00       CNY         Chinese GDP (QoQ)                                          2.0%     2.2%      
18:00       CNY         Chinese GDP (YoY)                                           7.6%     7.8%      
18:00       CNY         Chinese Industrial Production (YoY)                    9.8%     10.0%      
18:00       CNY         Chinese Retail Sales (YoY)                               13.6%     13.7%     * GMT-8 Sunday January 19th, 2014

Grande Tetons's picture

TKS. Did some garbage picking on the AUD/NZD rode her from the 105s to the 106.3 level. I am going to research the charts tomorrow and see where to position an AUD rev. After getting burned by weekend bullshit risk off dumps...I always like to wait unti Sunday. I call this my Boehner rule. 

I do have a small open EUR/GBP long w

hich contradicts this rule. Fuck it, I can lie to myself with the best of them. 

Grande Tetons's picture

YC, Nice. I bet you took a GBP/AUD short. Close at about 187. I will join you on Sunday if it opens near 186.5. 

denverdolomte's picture

Recovery :: 74,000 jobs created in December 2013 (according to the BLS, hilariously their site/server is out of service at the moment).

70,700 of those jobs were created in the Wholesale & Retail industries. Seasonal jobs which are probably already dissolved.

So in actuality 3,300 jobs were created in the United States in December. 

Fucking hilarious anymore. 

flow5's picture

And the Fed's research staff has been censored:

"The Federal Reserve Plans to identify key bloggers, and monitor billions of conversations about the Fed on..."




no more banksters's picture

Do it like Greenspan:

"At the beginning of last decade, when the towers of the World Trade Center collapsed during 9/11 attacks, the market suffered the biggest drop in history. Two weeks later, the “Enron” scandal revealed, and quickly became clear, that this was just the tip of the iceberg of a massive fraud from the corporations. Since the early 90s, many major companies were presenting fake profits, hiding their debts, with the help of the largest accounting firms. The paradox is that in the mid 90s, Greenspan had already realized that something was wrong with the economy, but ultimately convinced himself that computers were increasing the productivity in novel ways, too new to be detected in the data."

Nick Jihad's picture

With markets up substantially in 2013 executing those share buybacks has become increasingly expensive.

For the corporate insiders who are dumping their shares, that's not a bug, that's a feature.

29.5 hours's picture



I don't understand the capital expenditure numbers being elevated.

Certainly the impression is the major corporations are disinvesting in all the advanced, OECD countries. This has been going on for so long in this country that any reversal would be noticeable. Lots of investment money and hot money from financial institutions are certainly headed to BRIC and others but has this been of sufficient quantity to cause true increase in cap ex?



Seer's picture

One word: robotics

Could also be about (and in concert) with relocations and downsizings/resizings?

Big push up following a big dip.  Seems that these nullify, leaving a what would appear to be a fairly clear downward trend.

starman's picture

Shit, Yellens vagina is is trickling down, fuck I just puked!