Germany Has Recovered A Paltry 5 Tons Of Gold From The NY Fed After One Year

Tyler Durden's picture

On December 24, we posted an update on Germany's gold repatriation process: a year after the Bundesbank announced its stunning decision, driven by Zero Hedge revelations, to repatriate 674 tons of gold from the New York Fed and the French Central Bank, it had managed to transfer a paltry 37 tons. This amount represents just 5% of the stated target, and was well below the 84 tons that the Bundesbank would need to transport each year to collect the 674 tons ratably over the 8 year interval between 2013 and 2020. The release of these numbers promptly angered Germans, and led to the rise of numerous allegations that the reason why the transfer is taking so long is that the gold simply is not in the possession of the offshore custodians, having been leased, or worse, sold without any formal or informal announcement. However, what will certainly not help mute "conspiracy theorists" is today's update from today's edition of Die Welt, in which we learn that only a tiny 5 tons of gold were sent from the NY Fed. The rest came from Paris.

As Welt states, "Konnten die Amerikaner nicht mehr liefern, weil sie die bei der Federal Reserve of New York eingelagerten gut 1500 Tonnen längst verscherbelt haben?" Or, in English, did the US sell Germany's gold? Maybe. The official explanation was as follows: "The Bundesbank explained [the low amount of US gold] by saying that the transports from Paris are simpler and therefore were able to start quickly." Additionally, the Bundesbank had the "support" of the BIS "which has organized more gold shifts already for other central banks and has appropriate experience - only after months of preparation and safety could transports start with truck and plane." That would be the same BIS that in 2011 lent out a record 632 tons of gold...

Going back to the main explanation, we wonder: how exactly is a gold transport "simpler" because it originates in Paris and not in New York? Or does the NY Fed gold travel by car along the bottom of the Atlantic, and is French gold transported by a Vespa scooter out of the country?

Supposedly, there was another reason: "The bullion stored in Paris already has the elongated shape with beveled edges of the "London Good Delivery" standard. The bars in the basement of the Fed on the other hand have a previously common form. They will need to be remelted [to LGD standard]. And the capacity of smelters are just limited."

So... New York Fed-held gold is not London Good Delivery, and there is a bottleneck in remelting capacity? You don't say...

Furthermore, Welt goes on to "debunk" various "conspiracy websites" that the reason why the gold is being melted is not to cover up some shortage (and to scrap serial numbers), but that the gold is exactly the same gold as before. Finally, to silences all skeptics, the Bundesbank says that "there is no reason for complaint - the weight and purity of the gold bars were consistent with the books match." In conclusion, Welt reports that in 2014 "larger transport volumes" can be expected from New York: between 30 and 50 tons.

Here we would be remiss to not point out that the reason why the German people and the Bundesbank have every reason to be skeptical is that as Zero Hedge reported exclusively in November 2012, before the Buba's shocking repatriation announcement and was the reason for the escalation in lack of faith between central banks, it was the Fed and the Bank of England who in 1968 knowingly sent Germany "bad delivery" gold.  Which is why we have a feeling that the pace of gold transportation will certainly not accelerate until such time as the German people much more vocally demand an immediate transit of all their gold held at the New York Fed: after all, it's there right - surely the Bundesbank can be trusted to melt the gold (if any exists of course) into London Good Delivery or whatever format it wants.

Unless of course, the gold isn't there...

From November 9, 2012:

Bank Of England To The Fed: "No Indication Should, Of Course, Be Given To The Bundesbank..."

Over the past several years, the German people, for a variety of justified reasons, have expressed a pressing desire to have their central bank perform a test, verification, validation or any other assay, of the official German gold inventory, which at 3,395 tonnes is the second highest in the world, second only to the US. We have italicized the word official because this representation is merely on paper: the problem arises because no member of the general population, or even elected individuals, have been given access to observe this gold. The problem is exacerbated when one considers that a majority of the German gold is held offshore, primarily in the vaults of the New York Fed, and at the Bank of England - the two historic centers of central banking activity in the post World War 2 world.

Recently, the topic of German gold resurfaced following the disclosure that early on in the Eurozone creation process, the Bundesbank secretly withdrew two-thirds of its gold, or 940 tons, from London in 2000, leaving just 500 tons with the Bank of England. As we made it very clear, what was most odd about this event, is that the Bundesbank did something it had every right to do fully in the open: i.e., repatriate what belongs to it for any number of its own reasons - after all the German central bank is only accountable to its people (or so the myth goes), in deep secrecy. The question was why it opted for this stealthy transfer.

This immediately prompted rampant speculation within various media outlets, the most fanciful of which, of course, being that the Bundesbank never had any gold to begin with and has been masking the absence all along. The problem with such speculation is that, while it may be 100% correct and accurate, there has been not a shred of hard evidence to prove it. As a result, it is merely relegated to the echo chamber periphery of "serious media" whose inhabitants are already by and large convinced that all gold in the world is tungsten, lack of actual evidence to validate such a claim be damned (just like a chart of gold spiking or plunging is not evidence that a central bank signed the trade ticket, ordering said move), and in the process delegitimizing any fact-based investigations that attempt to debunk, using hard evidence, the traditional central banker narrative that the gold is there and accounted for.

And hard evidence, or better yet a paper trail of inconsistencies, is absolutely paramount when juxtaposing the two most powerful forces of our times: i) the central banking-led status quo (which is de facto the banker-led oligarchy whose primary purpose in the past several centuries has been to accumulate as much as possible of the hard asset-based fruits of people's labor, who toil in exchange for "money" created out of thin air - a process which could be described as not quite voluntary slavery, but the phrase would certainly suffice), and ii) "everyone else", especially when "everyone else" still believes in the supremacy of democratic forces, accountability, and an impartial legal system (three pillars of modern society which over the past 4 years we have experienced time and again have been nothing but mirages). Because without hard evidence, not only is the case of the people against central bankers non-existent, even if conducted in a kangaroo court co-opted by the banker-controlled status quo, it becomes laughable with every iteration of progressively more unsubstantiated accusations against the central banking cartels.

Finally, when it comes to cold, hard facts, which expose central banks in misdeed, even the great central banks have to be silent silent, as otherwise the overt perversion of justice will blow up the mirage that modern society lives in a democratic, laws-based world will be torn upside down.

And while others engage in click-baiting using grotesque hypotheses of grandure without any actual investigation, reporting or error and proof-checking to build up hype and speculation, which promptly fizzles and in the process desensitizes the general public and those actually undecided and/or on the fences about what truly goes on behind the scenes, Zero Hedge travelled (metaphorically) in space - to London, or specifically the Bank of England Archives - and in time, to May 1968 to be precise.

While there we dug up a certain memo, coded C43/323 in the BOE archives, official title "GOLD AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE OFFICE FILE: FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK (FRBNY) - MISCELLANEOUS", dated May 31, 1968, written by a certain Mr. Robeson addressed to the BOE's Roy Bridge as well as its Chief Cashier, and whose ultimate recipient is Charles Coombs who at the time was the manager of the open market account at the Fed, responsible for Fed operations in the gold and FX markets.

This memo, more than any of the other spurious and speculative accusation about Buba's golden hoard, should disturb German citizens, and of course the Bundesbank (assuming it was not already aware of its contents), as the memo lays out, without any shadow of doubt, that the BOE and the Fed, effectively conspired to feed the Bundesbank due gold bars that were of substantially subpar quality on at least one occasion in the period during the Bretton-Woods semi-gold standard (which ended with Nixon in August 1971).

The facts:  

At least two central banks have conspired on at least one occasion to provide the Bundesbank with what both banks knew was "bad delivery" gold - the convertible reserve currency under the Bretton Woods system, or in other words, to defraud - amounting to 172 bars. The "bad delivery" occured even as official gold refiners had warned that the quality of gold emanating from the US Assay Office was consistently below standard, and which both the BOE and the Fed were aware of. Instead of addressing the issue of declining gold quality and purity, the banks merely covered up the refiners' complaints 

It is this that the Bundesbank, the German government, and the German people should be focusing on. If in the process this means completely ridiculing the Buba's "she doth protest too much" defense strategy that what is happening in the media is a "phantom debate" as per Andreas Dobret's recent words, so be it. In fact, one may be well advised to ignore anything Buba has said on this matter, because in attempting to hyperbolize the matter out of irrelevancy, the Buba is now cornered and will have no choice now but to explain just what the true gold content of the gold even in its possession is, let alone that which is allocated to the Buba account 50 feet below sea level, underneath the infamous building on Liberty 33.

Full May 1968 memo from the BOE to the NY Fed: highlights ours:




U.S. Assay Office Gold Bars


1.  We have from time to time had occasion to draw the Americans’ attention of the poor standards of finish of U.S. Assay Office bars. In addition in 1961 we passed on to them comments from Johnson Matthey to the effect that spectrographic examination did not support the claimed assay on one bar they had so tested (although they would not by normal processes have challenged the assay) and that impurities in the bar included iron which caused some material to be retained on the sides of crucible after pouring.


2. Recently, Johnson Matthey have put 172 “bad delivery” U.S. Assay Office bars into good delivery form for account of the Deutsche Bundesbank. These bars formed part of recent shipments by the Federal Reserve Bank to provide gold in London in repayment of swaps with the Bundesbank. The out-turn of the re-melting showed a loss in fine ounces terms four times greater than the gross weight loss. Asked to comment Johnson Matthey have indicated verbally that:-


(a) the mixing of “melt” bars of differing assays in one “pot” could produce a result which might be a contributing factor to a heavier loss in fine weight but they did not think this would be substantial ;


(b) a variation of .0001 in assay between different assayers is an extremely common phenomenon;


(c) over a long period of years they had had experience of unsatisfactory U.S. assays


3. It is not, however, possible to say that the U.S. assays were at fault because Johnson Matthey did not test any of the individual bars before putting them into the pot.


4. The Federal Reserve Bank have informed the Bundesbank that adjustments for differences in weight and refining charges will be reimbursed by the U.S.Treasury.


5. No indication should, of course, be given to the Bundesbank, or any other central bank holder of U.S. bars, as to the refiner’s views on them. The peculiarity of the out-turn will be known to the Bundesbank: it has so far occasioned no comment.


6. We should draw the attention of the Federal to the discrepancy in this (and any similar subsequent such) result and add simply that the refiners have made no formal comment but have indicate that, although very small differences in assay are not uncommon, their experience with U.S. Assay Office bars has not been satisfactory.


7. We hold 3,909 U.S. Assay Office bars for H.M.T. in London (in addition to the New York holding of 8,630 bars). After the London gold market was reopened in 1954 we test assayed the bars of certain assayers to ensure that pre-war standards were being maintained. It might be premature to set up arrangements now for sample test assays of U.S. Assay Office bars but if it appeared likely that the present discontent of the refiners might crystalise into formal complain we should certainly need to do this.  In the meantime I would recommend no further action.


31st May 1968



To summarize: Bank of England discovers discrepancies with US Assay Office gold bars, notifies the NY Fed that its gold bars have major "bad delivery" issues, but, and this is the punchline, on this occasion, we'll keep it quiet, because the Bundesbank got these bars. This is merely one documented assay occasion: one can imagine that of the hundreds of thousands of gold bars in official circulation, the "good delivery" quality of bars outside of the US, and perhaps BOE, official holdings has progressively declined over the decades of Bretton Woods. One can also only imagine what has happened to all those "good delivery" bars currently held by the Fed as custodian at the NY Fed. Literally: imagine. Because there is no way to check what the real gold consistency of these gold bars is, and whether the refiners found ongoing future inconsistencies with "good delivery" standards of bars handed off to other "non-core" central banks. And, yes, without further evidence the above is merely speculation.

As to the remaining relevant facts: the US ran out of good delivery gold in March 1968 and only had coin bars remaining. Which is why it closed the gold pool and went to a two-tier price system. The Bundesbank went on to cover some of the outstanding gold debts of the Fed to the gold pool. Subsequently, the US then did several deals with the BOC to get a substantial amount of gold to pay back the Bundesbank which was sent over to England from March until June 1968. One can, again, only speculate on the quality of said gold. The Fed then created unsettled accounts to account for these transfers between itself and the Buba.

In light of the above facts and evidence, one can see why the Buba is doing all in its power to avoid the spotlight being shone on the purity of its gold inventory: after all the last thing the German central banks would want is someone to go through the publicly available archived literature, to put two and two together, and figure out that it does not take one massive "rehypothecation" (see "to Corzine") event for German gold credibility to be impaired: all it takes is death from a thousand micro dilutions over the decades to get the same end result. Because chipping away one ounce here, one ounce there for years and years and years, ultimately adds up to a lot.

We eagerly look forward to the Buba's next iteration of self-defense. We can only hope that this one does not include a reference to a "phantom debate", to "East German terrorist Simon Gruber" or to Goldfinger, as it will merely further destroy any remaining credibility the Bundesbank may have left in this, or any other, matter.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
syntaxterror's picture

Good luck with that Germany.

Murf_DaSurf's picture



It's all Hitler's fault..

Pladizow's picture

Hey Germany, karma is a bitch, you stole the gold from the mouths of Jews and now you cant get it back - boo hoo!

Bearwagon's picture

The problem seems to be that you can't get it back, but everything else is right ...

max2205's picture

Putin can't wait till it's safely back in Berlin.....

Bearwagon's picture

Maybe that's why it'll be shipped to Frankfurt ...  ;-)

shutdown's picture

I was thinking the same thing. One kilometer from the French border and it'll be safe. If it's a thousand kilometers from the Russian border it ain't safe.

But since it's been stored in the USA it's probably long gone. 

MeMadMax's picture

Better check that shit, make sure it's not gold painted lead!

BaBaBouy's picture

GERMANS (And Any Other Valued FED GOLD Clientel), You GET What You SEE...

For Reference, Please Proceed To Fort KNOX, AND OBSERVE Ye BARE SHELVES.

knukles's picture

The further this becomes main stream, the conspiracy theory becomes fact.
And the NWO comes under increasing pressure
To take drastic steps to regain control

Regardless of your views of AJ, this is a short read, interesting...
Pertains to exactly such Disturbances to the NWO's Force
BaBaBouy's picture

The SHIT Is Very Much Approaching the FAN ...


BaBaBouy's picture

Could You Imagine Mainstream Media's Lester Holt, Scott Pelley

AND Brian Williams Reporting On

This Major GOLD Manip SCAM ???????

BaBaBouy's picture

LATEST Rumor Is GERMAN CB Will Now Be Demanding
To Have Their Physical BITCOINS Returned...

... Probably Arrives Back Before Any Real GOLD Does ...

J S Bach's picture

Germany's "gold" is their productive capacity, ingenuity and willingness to work hard.  This is what Hitler based the mark on in the 30s through the use of Labor Treasury Certificates.  In the end, they don't need gold metal as long as they retain this cultural asset.

BringOnTheAsteroid's picture

Well, for all those obsessed by golds fiat price equivalent you are in for some very frustrating times ahead. You don't, in your right mind, expect the US government, of all the criminal enterprises in the world, to pay a fair and unmanipulated price for gold now do you?

There in lies the crux of the issue. The US stole Germany's gold expecting that they'd never ask for it back. Now they are forced to go to the market and they sure as hell ain't going to do that at anything less than a highly supressed gold price. It's not that the Fed just can't and don't print the money to buy the gold but I asume it's the perceived damage to the US dollar that they are worried about. Going into the market for 600 tons of gold would drive the price up . . . . . . . . . . the rest is gold bug frustration history.

Forget the fiat denominated price people and buy as much as you and as quick as you can. Don't make the same mistake I did though and tragically lose your lifes savings in a horrible boating accident. I mean you live and learn, I thopught gold would float so there'd be little risk of losing it. 

zaphod's picture

The US didn't steal Germany's gold, Germany lost that gold after it started and then utterly lost the largest war in mankind's history. A war where Germany committed such horrible sins that its lasting legacy was the civil rights movement.

Germany was allowed to maintain paper-only title to that gold after WWII to help it rebuild it's economy in the post-war era.

But make no mistake, Germany lost that gold due to its own actions and will never see it back.

wintermute's picture

Obama picked up the info from Merkel's phone she commented that even if Germany got 5 tons back it was progress.  So 5 tons they got then.

CuttingEdge's picture

If you want your gold, you can have your gold?

Obollocks is very consistent - in failing to deliver anything.


Supernova Born's picture

Germans, just keep producing those cars, trains, machine tools and other real items and we'll just keep pulling paper out of our ass to "pay" you.

Your welcome,

Bankster scum


fx's picture

why would the Buba want all the bars in lgd standard? Seems someone is in desperate need to get those - either to lend them out or to deliver them

GetZeeGold's picture






I'm getting squished bitchez!

snr-moment's picture

RIGHT.... but with their uberSocialist leanings and one of the lowest birthrates in  Europe because their kids cannot afford their own....well the physical will have to do.

aphlaque_duck's picture

If gold becomes money and they don't have it, then they're slaves.

nope-1004's picture

Gold always has been money.  CB's exchange gold all the time.  Recently, as in the last 40 years, the masses have been sold US dollar bullshit, as a way of keeping us all enslaved to the banks, treasury, and military.

Gold always has been money and always will be money.  So valuable it is that the US gov't has made an intentional and concerted effort to remove it's perceived legitimacy from the common person thought process of what money is, so that the USD fiat always reigns supreme.

Those days are coming to an end.


aphlaque_duck's picture

In that case, they're slaves already.

Rubbish's picture

Now I wonder if these gold eagles I own are what the US claims they are for purity.


But the story, funnier than shit, financial war in 3, 2, 1

Going Loco's picture

I decided a long time ago that I wouldn't buy any American gold. Then I got worried about a lot of other gold. There are a few forms I still trust. Not many. I would like to buy gold wire, the kind the Arabs used to use as storage-of-wealth, coiled round their ladies' arms. But this is taxed where I live, so I stick to pre 1914 circulated gold sovereigns. No purchase tax. No capital gains tax (where I live). Probably they could be faked, but so far I don't think that's a big problem.

JLee2027's picture

An individual can test an American Gold Eagle for purity easily enough. So we melted somebody elses gold bars to make it? Prove it.

aphlaque_duck's picture

Ultrasonic thickness gauge.

Doesn't work so much for coins (also they are 22KT for which I can't reference the speed of sound). But for bars with smooth parallel surfaces you can verify yourself that they are solid gold/silver.

new game's picture

so if they can be faked, well, i'm wondering about that back alley sale-hmm, bring firepower and a chance you may die...think i'll stay with lead deviratives, at least everybody knows the consequence of a failed sale.

i will say the shit is getting interesting though-foder for carmel coated corn...

Save_America1st's picture


Alex Jones and the InfoWars crew kick ass.  It's a daily listen for me on the 3 hour podcast.  He breaks more news and has more in depth high level interviews than anyone else out there. 

JLee2027's picture

Yeah, but the constant, this is an urgent emergency act now wears thin with that voice after awhile. Just load the shotgun and wait for action to commence.

ATM's picture

Load the shotgun??? Wait a second, are you Joe Biden??!

Shooting Shark's picture

I appreciate your disclaimer, but if it's actually interesting, it will pop up somewhere else in addition to IW.

FreedomGuy's picture

The Fed will get that gold to Germany as fast as Holder gets to all those scandal investigations.

TBT or not TBT's picture

He used to be so fast and furious, like when he was issuing all those bought and paid for pardons for the Clintons.

FreedomGuy's picture

Yes, Marc Rich ring any bells? Wonder why Obama chose Holder?

BobPaulson's picture

I believe the saying goes. " You don't get what you expect, you get what you INSPECT". Get those assay labs fired up.

AlaricBalth's picture

It would seem that the banning of native gold prospecting in Mali in favor of French interests is starting to allow France to ramp up its return of gold to Germany. The US had better invade another gold producing African country soon in order to catch up.

knukles's picture

Beings there are still plentiful US troopies stationed in the Conquered Germany (And to the victors belong the spoils!) it goes with out saying that:

"If we like your gold, we can keep your gold"

disabledvet's picture

This is going to be the biggest credit it raising in human history. France, Germany, Spain, Italy...they're going to need TRILLIONS. The IMF will demand all that gold as collateral...and then they'll be told to "open the books" Knickerbocker style. The Pound looks like it's going to collapse to me. I don't see the Swiss dollar looking any better either. The Nordic countries look great here. They could form some type of "Northern League" and start out where Europe has totally exchange rate mechanism of some sort...create some type of currency bloc to create some "heft" as all the other world reserve currencies get obliterated. I would argue very strongly that metals prices are really being set up for an even bigger fall here. Oh, and "we're really gonna find out just how efficient US industrial capacity really is" now that a "free energy and materials solution" is on the table.

tvdog's picture

You mean the Swiss franc? The only reason the franc would be in trouble is because they are printing them to cover massive capital inflows from the Eurozone.

RaceToTheBottom's picture

The Swiss franc is a sort of mini Euro, as they have pegged themselves to the Euro.  With their kowtowing to the US IRS and the peg, they are a shadow of their past.

BanksterSlayer's picture

If Germany wants gold, maybe it should start cutting a deal with the people who actually HAVE gold.

Follow the yellow brick road, dear Angela.

FreedomGuy's picture

Germany should offer to send over a boat and their own armored trucks. That should call the bluff.

Harbanger's picture

What's with all this National identity as if it makes a difference, who's Gold is it anyway?  Germany is no different than the US.  Aren't MerKel and Obama puppets to the same bankers?