What Goes Up...

Tyler Durden's picture

From Sean Corrigan of Diapason Commodities Management

What Goes Up...?

In terms of markets, equities are sufficiently overpriced and arguably so widely over-owned as to be vulnerable to any disequilibrating change in mass perception.
Though the week which unfolded as this was being written was a more rocky one than has been the case of late, it had not – at publication time – led to an open and widespread retreat from Panglossianism.

Yes, it is true that, just as had happened six months ago when the Fed first started its public ruminations about whether and when to start to reduce its stimulus, emerging markets have suffered a further bout of turbulence and it is also true that some of these are facing increasingly fraught social and political tensions, to boot. The cynic would say that such periods of upheaval are almost intrinsic to their designation as "emerging" but he would also be quick to point out that such susceptibilities are supposed to be rewarded with either a yield premium or its converse, a price discount.

The ironists among market punters will even attempt to construe all this as a reason to buy more developed world stocks on the premise that the money flooding out of such places as Thailand, the Ukraine, Turkey, and Argentina will be parked in the S&P and the DAX (perhaps overlooking the fact that the purchase price of these now-unwanted positions was most likely borrowed, meaning that their liquidation will also extinguish the associated credit, not re-allocate it).

The Goldilocks lovers will also tend to assume that any such disruption will serve to delay the onset of genuine tightening and may even induce further ill-advised stimulus measures on the part of the major central banks. Certainly Madame Christine Defarge – that tax-sheltered tricoteuse who knits beside the guillotine set up for the hated bourgeoisie – has already begun to militate for such a response.

For their part, the biddable are already trying to drown out the noise of the Cacerolazo by making the fatuous argument that the EMs account for such a piffling portion of world GDP that their fate should be a matter of complete indifference to the rest of us. Needless to say this is a touch disingenuous at best. Their share of end consumption-biased GDP may be lower, but they account for an equivalent fraction, if not a small majority, of global industrial production – and they have been responsible for an even bigger proportion of its growth this past decade. Ditto for trade and ditto for resource use.

Thus, even if the party-goers are becoming a little bleary-eyed and the band a little ragged in its timing, the punch bowl has not yet been drained completely dry, while the only authority figures in sight have rather promised to recharge it than threatening to take it away. We have had sufficient say above about equities, per se.

For bonds we can only add that, for now, the 3% level in the 10-years suffices to satisfy even the most avid fixed income vigilante while a reversal in credit will probably require either an equity collapse or a macro-economic reversal to shake out the yield-hungry and risk purblind.

As for commodities, they sit at an interesting juncture, with total returns beginning to bump up against their long down trend, thanks partly to steep backwardations in energy and the collision between an unusually cold US winter and a deceleration in dry gas production in the nation’s vast shale deposits. Industrial metals having traded sideways for six months are now hemmed in against the last 4 ½ years’ lows and a trend drawn off 2011’s post-crash zenith (on a TR-in-Yuan basis). Precious metals, after their annus horribilis in 2013 find themselves in not wholly dissimilar circumstances. Thus for each, a break either way could prove decisive. Agri’s bad run now stretched back 15 months and 20% and, guess what, the index is resting on resistance drawn through a series of lows set over the past 3 ½ years, hard up against a (slightly less compelling) down trend from the 2012 local max.

Perhaps more compelling is that, on the longest of long-term charts stretching back a century, metals are back to the centre of the trend of 3.1% (real growth related?) annual stock outperformance, while crude is homing in rapidly on its own 1% trend slippage versus the S&P.

Now this is not to say that the market, having swung from commodity overvaluation in 1980, to a relative stock extreme at the end of the 90s, and then back in favour of commodities in 2011, cannot overshoot again to the equity side of the pendulum. But what it does mean is that any further outperformance will henceforth be adding a premium, not reducing a discount.

It is perhaps too pat to rehearse the argument that if economic activity picks up so as to justify major stock market forward pricing, commodities can only improve while if not, then the impact of such a disappointment on overbought, over-leveraged equities must be bigger than it will be on unloved, under-owned commodities. Life very rarely offers such clear win:win situations – or at least not without a good deal of profit - and morale sapping path dependence ahead of the twin goalposts.

But, for all that, it is not too much of a leap to say that if we believe that the scope for producing profits out of an accounting package rather than off the end of an assembly line is somewhere close to its achievable limits then the maintenance of high, much less higher, stock prices must surely require confirmation in the macro numbers, that finally, after two-and-a-half years of stagnation, we see a meaningful pick up in trade flows, accompanied by signs that smoke is once more emerging from Europe’s factory chimneys.

Additionally, given the close correspondence between emerging equities and industrial commodities, the cry of ‘Fire!’ in that particular Theatre of the Absurd will almost certainly do more damage to the mainstream asset than to the alternatives.

On such a frail foundation of relativities, if for no more solid a reason, it may accordingly be time to start to rebalance portfolios away from those formerly winning positions in which there are too many co-owners and back towards the recent losing ones which have few, if any, friends at all. Risk and reward, is supposed to be the mantra after all.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
0b1knob's picture

< What goes up comes down.

< What gets high comes down like Philip Seymore Hoffman with a needle in his arm.   (Too soon?)

Midas's picture

That had not occurred to us, dude.

(way too soon for me)

Pure Evil's picture

Just another Luciferian sacrifice just in time for the Super Bowl.

Did anyone notice the Occult Rituals on CBS during the Grammy Awards?

All just co-ink-e-dink in my opinion.

0b1knob's picture

They always come in groups of three.   Paul Walker (burned alive) was probably first.

What's the over under for Justin Beiber being the third?

A little background on the Grammy awards.   They've been a Satanic showcase for years.



SafelyGraze's picture

when 'emerging market' countries run out of 'cash', they turn to us for loans.

this is called 'international development'

we don't have 'cash' either, but we do have 'special drawing rights', which we stand ready to issue as fiat and lend

the receiving country is free to convert its SDRs into any currency that forex markets allow

and then later it will be expected to give back the SDRs, plus interest, to us.

how will they get those SDRs? good question! only a finite supply of SDRs exists, and we determine that quantity. and we track where they circulate. 

but repayment is not our problem, is it.

chrissy and the friends of the number seven 

Winston Churchill's picture

Those IMF loan covenants specify gold for repayment of SDR

loans.Not fiat.

Strange dat.

Dr. Engali's picture

If it doesn't come down within four hours contact your physician....before then...... a central banker.

lolmao500's picture

This is going to be interesting...

Ukraine situation + this...


Russia threatens to quit START as US deploys Aegis destroyer to Spain
wmbz's picture

"What goes up, must come down" 

Is also an old sailboat racing anology. In that, when you are on a "lift"(sailing closer to the wind) at some point a "header" is coming your way. When the majority believe they have found a constint "lift" it is a safe bet a "header" is on the way!

The man with pointy horns's picture

What goes up... Must stay up God dangit!

The Old Man's picture

Beside the fact I had to look up two words to associate there meaning, the whole article reads like a warning to his Hedge Fund buddies that they shouldn't dump too much too soon. I think he may be ahead of the game by trying to buy time from his friends. I'd like to see his positioning come Monday. "Trust No One".

And no, I am not watching a bunch of millionaires chase some other millionaires around a field. I get enough of that here.

Bluntly Put's picture

Wow, such flowery language for a financial assessment.

Are English majors being recruited to write financial columns now?

Sufiy's picture

Charts worthwhile looking at:


Clive Maund: Our guide for a more definite indication that the wheel is coming off the broad market is the lower blue trendline shown on our 5-year chart for the S&P500 index below – if the market makes a significant breach of this supporting trendline we could see an absolute bloodbath that would quickly go global.