All Drugged Up: The Overmedication And Overschooling Of Today’s Youth

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Logan Allbright via the Ludwig von Mises Institute of Canada,

What are we going to do about those little monsters called children? They won’t be quiet, won’t sit still and won’t pay attention. They aren’t succeeding in school, and no matter how many drugs we pump into them, they don’t seem to get any better.

To the surprise of no one, a new study has just been released showing that the staggeringly popular prescription drug Adderall is not having any positive effects on children’s grades, and in fact may be causing more kids to drop out of school.

The finding should have been obvious, but don’t expect inattentive parents to stop buying the drug, and don’t expect greedy psychiatrists to stop handing them out like candy – for a hefty price.

The overmedication of our children is an increasingly troubling trend. We seem to think kids should behave like robots, always doing what they are told, when they are told, with no independence of thought or action. Any sign of resistance to indoctrination or disobedience of authority is diagnosed as some form of “disorder” and promptly treated with strong, dangerous drugs.

When I was in college, Adderall was the go-to drug for privileged rich kids trying to pull all-nighters for classes they had been too lazy to study for. It was a regular practice for students to announce “I’m going to see my shrink. Who needs what?” then return with a veritable pharmacological cornucopia of mood altering substances doled out by unethical or incompetent “doctors.”

The effects of these drugs were frightening. They transferred relatively normal undergraduates into hyperactive speed-freaks. And while the pills certainly kept students awake, concentration was the last thing they helped. I would be shocked if the presence of Adderall on campus improved a single grade, but it did cause alarming changes in behavior and personality, as well as apparently being quite addictive. And this is what they tell us we need to give young children.

If we want to know why children are failing in schools, the answer isn’t “lack of drugs” or even “psychological disorders.” Anyone who has ever been around a child should be able to predict the effects of cramming several dozen kids into a small, windowless room for six hours a day where they are made to sit still, pay attention and listen to the tedious droning of teachers pontificating on irrelevant subjects. This is not normal. This is not the way children are meant to be raised. In our desperate quest to compete with China and other Asian countries, we have come to believe that the secret to educational success is more rigidity, more control, and less freedom.

The problem is partially a cultural one, but it is also exacerbated by government attempts to meddle in education. No Child Left Behind, Head Start and Common Core Standards have all tried to impose top-down regulations on the way children are taught, as well as forcing them into failing public schools based on geography rather than the individual needs of students and parents.

Megan McArdle has a great article addressing this hyper-competitive fear of failure. We are so obsessed with the idea of our children ticking all the boxes – a good GPA, a high SAT score, a college education, grad school, work, marriage, kids, death – that we are terrified to allow for any experimentation or risk. The amount of pressure the average child faces today is insane. And when they don’t prove equal to it, we cram them full of pharmaceuticals at a time in their lives when their primary concerns should be climbing trees, catching frogs, and learning who they are as individuals.

Childhood suicides are becoming a major problem, and while the media has been attempting to put the blame on “bullying” – a phenomenon that has been around as long as there have been kids – few of us stop to consider whether the high-stress environment of modern schools may be contributing to the effect. Not to worry though! We can always just hand out another round of anti-depressants. What could possibly be the harm in that?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
john39's picture

get em young, hook 'em for life.   SOMA(TM)...  nirvana in a pill.

johnQpublic's picture

while agood article, its about 20+ years behind the power curve

though back then it was ritalin

but who could have guessed meth is bad right?



on a serious note, teacher across the street has a cure for hyperactive 4th grade boys

she sends them out in the hall, and has them run up and back down the hall when they arent paying attention

and voila, cured

kids need to run

like a dog

run 'em round til they have burned off some energy, then they can listen

Gaurden's picture

Bingo. Triple the laps for boys.

Dick Buttkiss's picture

Indeed, the better to get them to comform to lockup.

Either that, or let them be Free To Learn, as our 16-year-old son is, and thriving accordingly:

The Mist's picture

Shut up and take your SOMA, you'll feel better.

Overleveraged_and_Impatient's picture

Sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen.


"You made my kids run?!"


I hate america 

HardAssets's picture

Well, I guess a half clueless article is better than a fully clueless one.

'They' haven't wrecked the schools and put kids on drugs because they want them to better compete against China or because of 'all the pressures' today.

'They' don't want the masses to be able to compete . . . . especially against them and their off-spring.

Too many parents agree to have their kids drugged up because they have been indoctrinated to obey 'authority', espcially those with degrees and those in white coats. 100 years of public 'schooling' and almost 70 years of t.v. will do that to a population.  Some of the kids have enough of an inherent self respect to fight that brain washing and they are targeted.

Perhaps, in time, people will march their children obediently off to the ovens when they are told so by the 'doctors'.

debtor of last resort's picture

Look, to become a banker, you'll have to start early. You can't pay off your student loan by sniffing glue.

Deathrips's picture

Let me give it a shot here.

In a world where nobody can take responsibility for their governments actions on their behalf, why would you think parents know how to take responsibility for their kids? The state will be responsible for them, on behalf of the parents irresponsibility. State solution, usually the outcome is failure, is to sell more drugs and driven by profits -not solutions-. Plan or accident?

Parents will look to blame the outcome of the state (pharma and doctors now under ACA) alleviating their parenting responsibilities, for the consequences of them allowing their children to be experimented on. If the state is found at fault, the bill goes to the taxpayer as the state has no money..only a host. Messing with nature, is like messing with free ends badly.

Its always someone elses fault..according to television lobotomized lemmings. Guns, gays, left, right...introduce kids that need medicating. Add that both parents have to work to sustain a lower middle class lifestyle and they "don't have time to parent". They will probably blame it on terrorists, teapartiers, left, right or whomever but themselves.

In the end taking responsibility for the people granted the privilege of enforcing the will of the people, Is the only Solution. Bring back honest money so families can earn a decent living wage and spend time with their families and I bet the drug use would go down. Too bad the mass populace is focused on "something for nothing", "food for less" "fresh and easy"....while they get paid for their value created..nothing for something.


Loonies running the asylum. Maybe kids would be better raised by the TV..whoops I mean state.




Edit: Want something for your pieces of paper or digital blips for silver or gold. They are on Sale!!

Abitdodgie's picture

Firstly let me say that ALL these children do not belong to the parents, when the children are born every parent without fail abandons their children and gives them to the state in return for a birth cert , and then that child has 5 million dollars put into its Tresuary deposit account for use by the banks to dicharge credit that may be borrowed by the child in the future . The child can also use that account to discharge debt , but there is one problem you may not use your own account whilsts you are a 14th amedment citizen , because you have given up all your rights when you became a Citizen of the UNITED STATES . So only the state has the power over your children that you kindly look after for the state , do anything wrong and the state will take thier children back into CPS custerdy. You have to cancel all contracts with the Federal Govt and become a Citizen of the United States of America , then for the first time in your life you will live in the real America and have complete ownwership of you children.

Deathrips's picture

If you discharge debt under that TDA, does it commit you to the FG till paid back?

Instructions on cancelling federal contracts would be nice. A map in the right direction. I have a nephew about to be born any day.

Would appreciate it.





Abitdodgie's picture

download the "Errant Soverign's handbook " by Augustus Blackstone from the internet that will get you started. Good luck.

debtandtaxes's picture

"...that child has 5 million dollars put into its Tresuary deposit account for use by the banks to dicharge credit that may be borrowed by the child in the future ."

I've heard this one before - but ne'er any reference to prove it! While I would *love* a legal framework that allows us to "opt out" of the system - I haven't found one yet!


Miffed Microbiologist's picture

Personally, I think a lot of this behavior can be traced to poor diet. When I was carpooling with a few other moms I was shocked what they fed their kids. Usually shoved them in my car with a pop tart and a coke. My kids had a breakfast of an egg, sausage or bacon and a piece of whole grain toast. Their kids were bouncing off the walls in the backseat while mine were reviewing homework. Their teachers commented how much focus and attention our kids had, far above their grade level. I don't think this was genetics but a structured loving environment with plenty of exercise and good nutritious food. It's really that simple. Drugs just mask problems and create more problems by themselves.


juangrande's picture

It use to be that the "drug" was a good ass whipping, at best, and physical, sexual and/or verbal abuse at worst. Going back to what pre-empted today is stupid! The "family" was just as dysfunctional back then as it is now. It was just hidden under an agreed upon secrecy. Now our shit is in our face!  We are where we are because of the lack of ability and desire to grow our consciousness. 

VD's picture

Adderall is no joke! Messed me up v badly...

BurningFuld's picture

It is actually Crystal Meth in disguise. Being that it belongs to the exact same drug family and works identically in your brain. 

VD's picture

nah it's not as bad as crystal meth....but it exacts a price like anything else...the honeymoon period is quite effective...

Gaurden's picture

The new intelligence in kids is finding the ones that resist authority at age 2. They are the gifted ones.


Henry Chinaski's picture

You may have a point. I will never forget  putting my 2 year old son in time out.  He looked at me and said:  "When you put me in time out, I think of more bad things."  He turned out to be a math whiz, national merit scholar and is now being paid to study mechanical engineering.  (The university writes him a check each term, after covering his tuition, books, housing, etc.)

However, he was a non-starter, non social, under achiever in grade school.  Despite our skepticism, we allowed his doctor to prescribe ADD medication.  After the first few weeks, may son told us that he was happy at school instead of hating it. I don't thing the treatment is total BS, but I also think there is a lot of misuse. 

VD's picture

the honeymoon period works: dopamine production upped & prefrontal cortex risk/reward centers rewired for sure...prob is tolerance and long-term issues, not limited to what's been termed adderall-psychosis...careful it's a blackbox labelled for good reason...

Flakmeister's picture

Adderall, the Meth choice for a new Generation!!

HardAssets's picture

In many forums, when the subject of psycho meds are brought up there is a very strong reaction from people.

As pointed out in many recent articles, a lot of Americans have been put on this stuff and have put their kids on it.

"Little Johnny didn't like that they make him sit in a little chair at his desk all day while trying to fill his head full of b.s. in school. He doesnt like that and tends to fidget and sometimes talk back to the drone called a 'teacher'". Well, we've put him on 'medicine' now . . . and he seems to be a lot better."

An elderly relative of mine had a little poodle pup. Theyre an energetic breed, especially when so young. The lady asked her vet if there was something she could do to help calm the dog & prevent it from jumping so much. The vet said she could prescribe Prozac for the dog. (Guess they market it to vets too.)  The relative didn't want to do that and asked my opinion. Of course, I told her that minature poodles are energetic, that vet was insane,  and it was a good time to find a different vet.  I would have placed a good size bet that that vet was on Prozac herself.

What a country.

detached.amusement's picture

now when you say something intelligent like that, I up arrow ya

Flakmeister's picture

You don't know how that warms my very cockles....

drB's picture

Spanking has shown its positive effect on learning and ability to concentrate for hundreds and perhaps thousands of years. Adderall, not so much.

"High stress environment of schools" has been around since the inception of schools, see any description of Victorian times. Somehow 100 or 300 years ago adderall was not needed.

Gaurden's picture

I dont know why their all stressed out, they arent there to learn anything important. The people who partied through school were right to do so.

Its not like theres a classes on:

Resisting Tyrants

Your freedom is depenant on others freedom 

Critical Thinking

Questioning Authority

 Real History

Knowing when your under attack

Detecting sociopaths


Radical Marijuana's picture

Ah yes, Guarden, IF school were any good, rather than evil, then those would be the kinds of courses that they would teach! However, it is inherently paradoxical for authorities to teach that authorities ought not be trusted. Ideally, the teachers should be enlightened enough to know that, and so, to teach that. However, in fact schools are soft prisons, and the teachers are soft cops. (While the trends are towards those not being so "soft" anymore.)

Gaurden's picture

Yea the way this is going people will have to teach their kids to be the devil just so they can compete.

and that will be the last generation of humans...

NemoDeNovo's picture

WHo the hell would junk you for that comment??  Frickin ZH is goin downhill fast..........

HardAssets's picture

I did my undergrad work at a university that was science and engineering orientated, though there was the broad spectrum of degrees offered in various fields.

Everyone knew that the profs and students in the Ed dept were the dumbest around.

A buddy of mine was a good guy, liked kids, and wanted to be a teacher. He used to joke about how stupid his classmates and the profs were.


My point is that youre not likely to find a lot of 'enlightenment for reform' from that quarter - - - The few rare souls that try to do so are the exception that proves the rule.  For most, its about a cushy job, lots of vacation time, job security & pension, and pretty decent salaries for the 'work'.  (Just check out what principals in some places are making nowadays).  Not rocking the boat seems to be a major part of the job description - - - like a lot of govt 'workers'. They have internalized the lesson to 'respect authority' and credentials. So, they all run off and get a 'Masters' in Ed b.s. piece of paper in a few years after starting out.


The number of down arrows should be a pretty good count of the number of public school 'teachers' reading this.

Lordflin's picture

Well, my friend... I was a public school teacher... high school and advanced placement chemistry... My experience with the teachers I met was that most  were competent and devoted, you have losers in any profession.

Mixing the influx of illegals into the general population makes for a depressing environment in the classroom, as most are severely undereducated, but even that could be dealt with.

The problem is that the system does not intend to educate, but rather to inculcate young people with ideas such as life is dull,there is little point to learning, be prepared to spend a life of menial servitude... and above all obey authority.

On the other hand I suspect there was an abundance of idiots attending your school.

HardAssets's picture

Well my friend, I don't know what you meant by "HanGing school" but can guess the meaniing of "with the teachers I met was that most competent were and devoted"  - - -If your typing skills are as poor as mine are, we'll let it pass.

What did you do to try to change things ?  Have you read John Taylor Gatto ?  Do you know anything about the Prussian education system influence on American mandatory public education ?  Do you know the impact of private foundations in establishing Ed schools in universities ?  You do know that technical education is all well and good (my undergrad degree is in engineering), but that doesn't make for a truly educated human being ?

A chem teacher wouldl likely be able to teach kids a lot more if they earned a degree in Chemical Engineering, worked in the real world for a few years, and then taught classes . . . . without the monoopoly granting 'certificate' of teaching required.

If you were one of the good guys and tried to impact a system which does as its designed to do - dumb down students and make them compliant - then good for you. The odds are that you were as clueless as most of them in the system.

Yes, there were plenty of idiots at my undergrad university. A disproportionate number of them were in the Ed dept.

P.S. - looks like you did an edit job after reference to your earlier post. That's generally frowned upon here. We can edit as much as we need before we are quoted by someone, but its considered 'chickensh*t' to do so afterwards.

"The problem is that the system does not intend to educate, but rather to inculcate young people with ideas such as life is dull,there is little point to learning, be prepared to spend a life of menial servitude... and above all obey authority."  on this part of your post we are in full agreement.

Looking back over my earlier reply (before this P.S. - I was a bit harsh) Given that portion of your comment that I quoted last, it looks like we are mostly on the same page in many ways.


Lordflin's picture

What I meant was that I was typing on my damned iPad... You will now observe that it has be corrected.

I do not, as a habit, insult people... But I would tend to class this more in the realm of information...

You are truly an imbecile and a waste of time...

HardAssets's picture

You'll notice I didn't make Ad Hominem attacks, just made observations about the general quality of public 'educators'. You didn't reply or make reference to Gatto, the Prussian ed system, private foundation influence on establishing Ed schools, etc . . . . but went to the Ad Hominem & apparently a quick retreat.

This is an obvious tactic in a weak argument. Maybe that works on most high school kids, but it won't work here.

If you truly care, do a little research on those subjects that were mentioned. If you did so you'd see that your opinon that most teachers are dedicated/competent professionals but there are a few bad ones, like in most fields . . . is deeply flawed, and beside the point.

detached.amusement's picture

my coz got laughed out of family dinner one Sunday trying to tell us how necessary and important and beneficial for the kids the tenure idea was.  given that he was a year or two away from it at the time, he didnt take it too well.  somehow these guys think there should be a coefficient of friction at one's job, and getting past that means your job is now superfluid and nothing can cause resistance for you.


sorry coz, the world dont work that way.  perform or go the way of the dodo, its not perform for a while and then get the 'untouchable' nod from some peers.

Lordflin's picture

I did not respond specifically because frankly the things you wrote were not worth a response.

You read a couple of books, and have some causual and suddenly you have become an expert. I spent a lifetime attempting to reform the educational system from the inside...

The problem for the most part is not the teachers... and for everyone you can point a finger to I can find as many misfits elsewhere.

The problem is the system which as I posted above does not intend to educate. As teachers we gave untold amounts of our time dealing with the problems of running a school and establishing an environment where young people could learn. At the same time the principle would lock herself in her office for the entire day with her handful of picked cronies and plot against teachers... litterally... while two or three hundred kids were wandering the campus, rapes were taking place in the restrooms, etc. I along with  several others, although I created the policies, we eventually solved many of these problems all the while I and others were carrying a full teaching load. Funny enough... all the time we were working to that end the principle did her best to stop us. When we finally cleaned up the school she had the press down showing them what a great job she was doing.

The kids during lunch and nutrition would throw their garbage onto the ground. I remember one young man complaining that the school needed to hire more janitors as the mess was not getting picked up in time. I approached the principle one day and suggested to her that we add five minutes onto lunch and nutrition and converge on the students as a faculty and force them to put their trash in the receptacles. It was my opinion that after a coupld of days the kids would learn that it was easier to put it there to beging with. She told me that we could not order the kids to do anything we could only ask them.

As to you thinking that someone coming from industry would be a better teacher... you do not know the first thing about teaching. Could someone come from industry and become a good teacher...sure... but they would, and did as I knew several such people, have a great deal to learn. Should a teacher be a master of their subject... absolutely... but that is only one of many requirements.

This slamming of teachers took place as a distraction from what was really going on. The system was intentionally destroying young people, and still is...

I will admit that I have been disappointed with much of the teaching staff since moving to Northern Idaho. This is more of a rural area and they do not pay well at all... old addage, you get what you pay for. My son took chemistry at one of the local high schools. His teacher did not even introduce balancing equations until somewhere in the second semester. You cannot teach chemistry until students learn this skill... it would be on the level of teach literature to people who could not form a sentence. When I challenged him on it he suggested that the federal government was insisting that chemistry be severly dumbed down so more people would pursue it as a career... Perhaps that makes sense to you, I certainly don't get it. Sometime in the second semester this same teacher was teaching chemical reactions that would only occure with catalysis... yet he was writing these equations as though they were spontaneous. Leaving aside the question of why he was introducing biological reactions in a basic inorganic class, the fact was that when I pointed this out to him... told him that what he was teaching was not even true, he could not understand the problem. I have since learned that the new standard in education states that it does not matter what you teach, or even that it is true, the point is that the students get the experience of learning.

Education is being destroyed from the top down. The teachers, with some exceptions my son's chemistry teacher being one of them, are being used as scapegoats.

Hope this has been specific enough for you.

Lordflin's picture

And btw I did not down flag you... Figured you could more or less guess my sentiment from context.

HardAssets's picture

Lordflin - thank you for your very interesting comments. It must have been extremely frustrating for you. I tried to have an influence on the local school board and (with other colleagues with engineering, science, and military officer backgrounds) offered our services as free voluntary instructor/tutors in the schools.  We met much resistance from those in the education administration. It was a long and ultimately futile effort.

Of course, this is a broad topic that goes beyond just math & science teaching. Focusing on those technical fields narrowly, produces nothing but technicians - not people who are truly educated. They may be technician/technocrats with Phds and realatively high salaries, but they are still limited & narrow in their viewpoint.

IMO, shared by others - the American mandatory public education system is not reformable. It does what it is designed to do. It produces compliant workers for routine jobs, with some of the brighter students receiving more advanced but narrowly focused technical schooling.They are the society's doctors, lawyers, scientists, etc   But just ask any of these highly educated people about the nature of money or banking, for example,  and most are as ignorant of such topics as the general population. They may apply the scientific method in their jobs, but not in ways which make informed citizens.

The American 'schooling' system was captured more than 100 years ago by private interests. These actions and the ones that followed, including the latest versions such as No Child Left Behind and Common Core are gutting real learning & our nation.

BTW - I never downarrow people who just disagree with me either. I welcome debate and exchange of ideas - heated or otherwise.  Regards, - - -

Lordflin's picture

I voted against every school bill that ever came up, despite the fact they were paying my salary, in the hope that the system would die of starvation. The last thing I am is a supporter of public schools.

And I agree that there are very few educated people coming out of our universities... the vast majority are merely trained, as you have pointed out. Education is an inside job... To be truly educated you must educate yourself. Most of what I have learned I have learned on my own, despite over eight years of university education where I pursued the hard sciences.

The fact is education is no longer a goal, nor do I believe that it will be until society resets... assuming there is something of a world left. Sadly, we live in a time that values knowledge over wisdom. Knowledge without wisdom is a great deal worse than nothing.

HardAssets's picture

Lordflin - - - I also wanted to add that I read the details of your son's 'chemistry' experience several times. I was dumbfounded when I read it. The idea of someone 'teaching' h.s. chemistry without balancing equations is  . . . absolutely amazing. You are more patient a man than I am. I frankly wouldn't even know where to begin with that chem 'teacher'.  What do you even say to someone that stupid and/or incompetent ?

Not only is knowledge valued over wisdom. Data is valued over knowledge.

So its o.k. if whats learned is wrong, as long as they go through the motions, and 'feel good' afterwards ?  Incredible.

Things have gotten even worse than before, it seems.

All Risk No Reward's picture

And it will continue to get worse - smart children are a threat to the current system - especially now that they are orchestrating the collapse of American society through debt money fraud.

Lordflin's picture

Let me add one more thing. In today's educational system students are being empowered to go after teachers. A kid walks into administration and says he saw me fly from the top of B Hall on a broomstick and the next thing you know the administration is attempting to burn me in the middle of the quad as a witch. When the charges are proven to be groundless nothing happens to the kid. He is free to make another accusation against another teacher the following week.

In such an environment many teachers will not take risks. In one sense I could not blame them. As for myself... Once kids passed through my door into my classroom I considered them my responsibility... ostensibly the law did as well... And I did and still do take teaching very seriously. besides, I don't like my time wasted. If I am going to hang out in a room with a bunch of young people all day something of value is going take place there.

But for this and many other reasons many teachers eventually lose heart.

All Risk No Reward's picture

Lordfin is exactly correct.

Rockefeller andn Carnegie led a successful effort to counterfeit liberal (as in mind liberating) education with Prussian schooling where the #1 focus was to teach appeal to authority logical fallacy and subservience to authority (ultimately Rockefeller type financed "authority").

Everything else was and is secondary.

Teachers execute this monstrosity... and if they don't, they will be replaced.

John Taylor Gatto is the Grand Master on this subject and you should be able to search all kinds of goo Gatto resources.

The Ultimate History Lesson:

Search "YouTube playlist of this video" fhe link to the Youtube playlist. 

The Underground History of American Education - free online...

School Sucks Podcast with some well done readings from the aforementioned book...

“We want one class of persons to have a liberal education, and we want another class of persons, a very much larger class of necessity in every society, to forgo the privilege of a liberal education and fit themselves to perform specific difficult manual tasks.”
? Woodrow Wilson

"Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy. . . . It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished. . . . Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible. . . .”-
Bertrand Russell,1953

"Men are born ignorant, not stupid. They are made stupid by education."
~Bertrand Russell

"We all have a tendency to think that the world must conform to our prejudices. The opposite view involves some effort of thought, and most people would die sooner than think – in fact they do so."
~Bertrand Russell, The ABC of Relativity (1925), p. 166.

"In this way, one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period.... No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades."
~Zbigniew Brzezinksi, Between Two Ages

Why dumb us all down?

“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”
~Zbigniew Brzezinksi, Between Two Ages

"Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."
– David Rockefeller

"Advocates of capitalism (Rockefeller types) are very apt to appeal to the sacred principles of liberty, which are embodied in one maxim: The fortunate must not be restrained in the exercise of tyranny over the unfortunate."
Bertrand Russell

These two sound a lot more like Hitler than George Washington, don't they?

How do they manipulate and control the masses?

“In the technotronic society the trend would seem to be towards the aggregation of the individual support of millions of uncoordinated citizens, easily within the reach of magnetic and attractive personalities exploiting the latest communications techniques to manipulate emotions and control reason.”
? Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era

rwe2late's picture

All Risk

"These two sound a lot more like Hitler"?????

Are you referring to Bertrand Russell as one of the two (along with Rockefeller),

because of those quotes from Russell you cited?

If so, I believe you are mistaking Russell's sarcastic criticism for advocacy.


Similarly with Brzezinski, though I disagree with him on other matters, in this case I believe correctly read,

he was predicting with apprehension, not advocating.

HardAssets's picture

All Risk No Reward - thank you for taking the time to post those quotes and links. I'd previously read all the works cited and listened/watched the videos & audio recordings.

As Thomas Jefferson wrote:  "If you expect a nation to be ignorant and free, you expect what never was and can never be." 

Education is a vital subject for all of us, even those without kids.

I know some good, dedicated public school teachers who are truly trying to make a positive impact on kids lives. And, I have run across quite a few that coast along or have been so beaten down & exhausted by the system, that they are just gliding along to retirement.

I try to steer as many of them as possible to Gatto's work "The Underground History of America Education" so they can see the bigger picture and understand why their efforts are usually thwarted, and why things never really seem to change - except for the worse.  (This book can be read online for free at the link you provided above.)

Private interests entered colleges and established Schools of Education in the early 20th Century. They had (have) an agenda, and it isn't to support the maintenance of a democratic American republic with informed and active citizens. They were particularly interested in 'tranforming' (that is, wrecking) the way American history was taught in K-12 and in the universities. They have been very successful in these efforts, as evidenced by the various videos showing people interviewed on the most basic aspects of the US Constitution, Bill of Rights, etc.

If you received an education degree, everything you were taught is within this framework.(And this is the real reason that teaching certificates are mandated - even for experienced & successful professionals who have taught people in industry and military service academies)

Real reform, that is the kind which helps students become critical thinkers and informed citizens - does not happen because the system is designed to do the very opposite of that.

In the former USSR there were those with advanced degrees in communist party theory and its practice. And, they would have conferences where they discussed all the minute details. Of course, all that was beside the point - the foundations of it all were intellectually and financially bankrupt. The real purpose of those conferences was to maintain the existing structure by trying to give it intellectual legitimacy. Gorbachev's stated goals to 'reform' that system were doomed to fail also.

I agree with the teacher/reformer who said that real education won't likely be possible till there is a complete Reset.  True education is individual in nature. You provide this for yourself and for your kids. (Start with less t.v. time and more time reading & discussing good books. Learn critical thinking skills. Encourage independent creative projects.) - Many of the good teachers are frustrated by the apathetic attitudes of many parents who use school as a baby sitter.

Interview with Congressional investigator Norman Dodd regarding the objectives & impact of private foundations on education in America:

(If the above link goes down, do a search on YouTube and you should easily find other links to that interview by G. Edward Griffin.)

"The only thing that interferes with my learning, is my education." - Albert Einstein